Identification of Novel Brominated Compounds in Flame Retarded

Dec 22, 2016 - Identification of Novel Brominated Compounds in Flame Retarded Plastics Containing TBBPA by Combining Isotope Pattern and Mass Defect C...
5 downloads 13 Views 826KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO LIBRARIES

Article

Identification of novel brominated compounds in flame retarded plastics containing TBBPA by combining isotope pattern and mass defect cluster analysis Ana Ballesteros-Gómez, Joaquin Ballesteros, Xavier Ortiz, Willem Jonker, Rick Helmus, Karl J. Jobst, John Robert Parsons, and Eric J Reiner Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03294 • Publication Date (Web): 22 Dec 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 27, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 24

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Identification of novel brominated compounds in flame retarded plastics

2

containing TBBPA by combining isotope pattern and mass defect cluster analysis

3 4 5

Ana Ballesteros-Gómez1*, Joaquín Ballesteros2, Xavier Ortiz3, Willem Jonker4, Rick Helmus5, Karl J. Jobst3, John R. Parsons5, Eric J. Reiner3 1

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

VU University Amsterdam, Institute for Environmental Studies, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV

Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2

University of Málaga, Department of Electronic Technology, Bulevar Louis Pasteur 35, 29010 Málaga, Spain 3

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, 125 Resources Road, M9P 3V6, Toronto (ON), Canada 4

VU University Amsterdam, Division of Bioanalytical Chemistry, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands 5

University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands

16 17

*Corresponding author

18

E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

19

Tel: + 31205983193

20

Fax +31205989553

21 22 23 24 25 26 27

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 24

28

ABSTRACT

29

The study of not only main flame retardants but also of related degradation products or

30

impurities has gained attention in the last years and is relevant to assess the safety of our

31

consumer products and the emission of potential contaminants into the environment. In this

32

study, we show that plastics casings of electric/electronic devices containing TBBPA contain

33

also a complex mixture of related brominated chemicals. These compounds were most

34

probably coming from impurities, byproducts or degradation products of TBBPA and TBBPA

35

derivatives. A total of 14 brominated compounds were identified based on accurate mass

36

measurements (formulas and tentative structures proposed). The formulas (or number of

37

bromine elements) for other 19 brominated compounds of minor intensity are also provided. A

38

new script for the recognition of halogenated compounds based on combining simplified

39

isotope pattern and mass defect cluster analysis was developed in R for the screening. The

40

identified compounds could be relevant from an environmental and industrial point of view

41 42

Keywords: flame retardants, mass defect plots, non-target screening, TBBPA, mass spectrometry

43 44

TOC (graphical abstract)

45 46 47

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 24

Environmental Science & Technology

48

INTRODUCTION

49

Brominated flame retardants (BFRs) are chemicals of concern due to their persistence and

50

ubiquity in the environment and their potential toxicity.1,2 In recent years, new halogenated

51

flame retardants have been identified for the first time in products or environmental samples.

52

For example, two chlorinated organophosphate flame retardants were identified in

53

polyurethane foam from baby care products, namely 2,2-bis(chloromethyl)propane-1,3-diyl-

54

tetrakis(2-chloroethyl)bis(phosphate), known commercially as “V6”, and the analogue 2,2-

55

bis(chloromethyl)propane-1,3-diyl tetrakis(1-chloropropan-2-yl) bis(phosphate), known as “U-

56

OPFR”.3 “V6” was later reported in dust samples collected in houses and cars.4 Subsequently, a

57

triazine-based flame retardant [2,4,6-tris(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)-1,3,5-triazine, TTBP-TAZ] was

58

identified by our research group in plastics of items usually found at homes and in house dust.5

59

Special attention has also been given to tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) derivatives, since

60

TBBPA and TBBPA-based flame retardants are widely used in electrical/electronic equipment.

61

Tetrabromobisphenol A is indeed considered the most widely used BFR nowadays and it has

62

raised environmental concern, as occurring with other halogenated flame retardants, due to its

63

ubiquity and potential toxicity.6 The global market demand for the major brominated flame

64

retardants was 203,790 metric tonnes in 2001 and TBBPA accounted for 58.7% of this total

65

market.7

66

reported in dust in 2008.8 TBBPA-DBDPE together with other derivatives [tetrabromobisphenol-

67

A-bis(allyl ether) (TBBPA-AE) were also reported in 2010 in Great Lakes herring gull eggs9 and

68

later in 2013 in soil, sediment, rice hull, and earthworm samples collected near a BFR

69

manufacturing plant.10 Not only BFRs, but also new byproducts or impurities derived from

70

TBBPA, or from its alternative tetrabromobisphenol-S (TBBPS), have been very recently

71

reported in environmental samples.11,12 The persistence and toxicity of these related

72

compounds as well as their presence in the environment is still unknown.

73

In this study, we analyzed plastics of casings of electronic/electrical products commonly found

74

in homes (televisions, computers, etc.) that contained a high concentration of TBBPA for further

75

detection of brominated impurities or byproducts coming from the synthesis or of degradation

Tetrabromobisphenol-A-bis-(2,3-dibromopropylether)

(TBBPA-BDBPE)

was

first

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 24

76

products formed during the processing or the aging of the product. Polyhalogenated molecules

77

have a unique negative mass defect (difference between exact and nominal mass) and

78

particular isotopic patterns, which readily distinguishes them from non-halogenated

79

compounds in a complex mass spectrum. These differences can be visualized for example by

80

constructing a mass defect (MD) plot, where mass defect is represented against exact mass. 13-

81

15

82

been reported in the literature.16-18 Recently, precursor isolation based on characteristic

83

fragments (e.g. Br) has been also proposed as a suitable method for the non-target screening of

84

halogenated compounds.19

85

In this study, we identify a variety of unreported brominated compounds, most probably

86

degradation products, byproducts or impurities of TBBPA or TBBPA derivatives in plastic casings

87

of consumer electronics. These compounds could be relevant with respect to the environment

88

or for industrial quality control purposes. For simplifying the screening, a new script was

89

developed in R to automate the construction of MD plots and the recognition of potential

90

brominated compounds. The script is based on recognition of characteristic halogenated

91

isotope patterns and specific mass defects. To the best of our knowledge the recognition of

92

halogenated peaks by construction of mass defect plots is done by a visual and time consuming

93

step. The automation of this process has not been up to date reported and is in this study

94

described for the first time.

95

proposed based on mass accuracy, isotopic patterns and MS/MS spectra.

96

MATERIALS AND METHODS

97

Chemical and reagents

Another common strategy is the recognition of typical halogenated isotopic patterns in the

Possible molecular formulas and tentative structures were

98

Methanol (MeOH) was obtained from J.T. Baker® (Center Valley, USA). Tetrahydrofuran

99

(THF) was acquired from Biosolve (Valkenswaard, The Netherlands). Ultrapure water was

100

obtained from an “PURELAB Ultra Mk2” system (ELGA, High Wycombe, United Kingdom). All

101

solvents and reagents were of analytical grade and used as supplied. For sample treatment,

102

micro-centrifuge filters (0.2 μm, nylon) from Costar Spin-X obtained from Sigma-Aldrich were

103

used for removing micro-particles from sample extracts when necessary. The compounds 2,4,6-

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 24

Environmental Science & Technology

104

tribromophenol (2,4,6-TBP) and TBBPA were obtained from Wellington Laboratories (Guelph,

105

Ontario, Canada).

106

Instruments

107

A high resolution QTOF instrument (maXis 4G upgraded with HD collision cell, Bruker

108

Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI)-ion booster source

109

operating in negative mode was used for analysis (resolving power up to 80,000 FWHM). The

110

ion booster ESI source employs an additional soft voltage and a vaporizer temperature, with

111

respect to a standard ESI source, in order to improve ionization efficiency. Mainly [M-H]- anions

112

were observed for brominated compounds with ion booster ESI.

113

The source parameters were as follows: capillary, 1 kV; end plate offset, 400V; charging

114

voltage, 500 V; nebulizer gas, 4.1 bar; dry gas, 3.0 L/min; dry temperature, 200°C and vaporizer

115

temperature, 320°C. The mass analyzer settings were: funnel 1 RF, 400 Vpp (peak-to-peak

116

voltage); multipole RF, 400 Vpp; quadrupole ion energy, 3.0 eV; collision RF, 750 and 1000 Vpp

117

for m/z below and above 560, respectively; transfer time, 50 and 60 μs for m/z below and

118

above 560, respectively, and pre-pulse storage, 10 μs. Collision energies for MS/MS

119

experiments were 40 eV for every compound except for m/z of 792.5 and of 928.5 for which 50

120

and 70 eV were used instead, respectively. Mass calibration was performed using a 2mM

121

sodium acetate solution in water:isopropanol 1:1 v/v.

122

Liquid chromatography was performed using an UHPLC system (Nexera, Shimadzu, Den Bosch,

123

The Netherlands) equipped with a binary pump, autosampler and column oven. An InertSustain

124

C18 (3 µm particle size, 10 mm length) precolumn and an InertSustain C18 (3 µm particle size,

125

2.1 mm i.d., 100 mm length) column were used as stationary phase (GL Sciences, Eindhoven,

126

The Netherlands). For the mobile phase, ultrapure water and MeOH were used in the following

127

gradient: 60% MeOH for 0.5 min, a linear gradient to 98% MeOH in 15 min followed by 98%

128

MeOH for 10 min. The flow was 0.3 mL/min, the column temperature was set at 35 ºC and the

129

injection volume was 5 µL.

130

Sample collection and preparation

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 24

131

Four plastic samples from casings of electrical/electronic devices that were bought in

132

electronic stores in the Netherlands in 2014 and 2015 and that contained a high concentration

133

of TBBPA (0.2%-6.7% w/w) were included in the study with the aim of identifying related

134

compounds.20 The samples were pre-selected by using a simple screening technique based on

135

direct probe ambient mass spectrometry.20 The samples were hard plastics coming from casings

136

of an electrical adaptor (5.2% w/w TBBPA, sample 1), a television (0.2% w/w TBBPA, sample 2),

137

a decorative item (0.2 % w/w TBBPA, sample 3) and a router (6.7 % w/w TBBPA, sample 4). The

138

extraction method was adapted from Ballesteros-Gómez et al.20 Plastic samples (around 50 mg)

139

were taken from each device (casing) by using a surgical cutter and a Stanley knife and

140

extracted with 10 mL of a mixture THF:MeOH (70:30, v/v) by sonicating (60min) and stirring

141

(200 rpm) for 12 h. Extracts were ultracentrifuged (10,.000 rpm, 5min) to precipitate solids and

142

evaporated to around ~0.5 mL (N2, 40 ◦C). After the addition of 0.5 mL of methanol:THF (70:30,

143

v/v) to each extract, samples were ultracentrifuged (10.000 rpm, 5min) again and further

144

filtrated if required (with 0.2 μm microcentrifuge filters). Procedural blanks were prepared in

145

the same way (solvent extraction, evaporation, filtration) but without containing any sample.

146

Finally, aliquots of 2-5 µL were analyzed by LC-QTOF. In order to prevent losses of compounds

147

during sample treatment, no clean-up was performed before analysis.

148

Data processing for untargeted screening of brominated compounds

149

The software Data Analysis and Metabolic Detect from Bruker Daltonics (Bremen, Germany)

150

was used for data processing. Metabolic detect (originally intended for the identification of

151

metabolites) was used to subtract the background noise of the total ion chromatogram by using

152

the eXpose algorithm provided by the software. The eXpose algorithm performs a background

153

subtraction in a chromatogram from a reference chromatogram (in this study coming from a

154

procedural blank) by setting certain tolerance values for retention time and mass position.

155

Blank subtraction was very useful to provide cleaner spectra and improve in this way the

156

isotope pattern recognition by the developed script.

157

The mass spectra within the retention time window of interest (1.5-17 min) was summed and a

158

list of m/z and corresponding intensities generated and exported in .xls format. The use of LC

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 24

Environmental Science & Technology

159

instead of direct injection made easier a simultaneous confirmation of the identified

160

compounds by later inspection of the chromatographic peaks corresponding to the extracted

161

ion chromatograms of the target ions. In this sense we could avoid false positives due to in-

162

source fragmentation, relate expected retention times with the calculated logP of the

163

structures20 and perform further MS/MS experiments. The.xls file was directly imported in the

164

in-house script (written in R language, www.r-project.org) for the generation of the mass defect

165

(MD) plot and for the recognition of potential halogenated compounds. As an output of the

166

script, we obtained a MD plot highlighting in a distinctive color (green) those m/z values

167

corresponding to potential halogenated compounds and a list of the m/z of interest. The scale

168

factor −H/+Br (78/77.91051) was used for the construction of the MD plot to visually identify

169

structures correlated by subsequent addition of bromine atoms.

170

Finally, suitable formulas were generated with the smart formula tool from Data Analysis that is

171

based on generating the formulas that match both mass accuracy and mSigma values settings

172

(match factor between the measured isotopic pattern and the theoretical pattern for a given

173

formula). Values of less than 5 ppm of mass error and less than 100 of mSigma were considered

174

acceptable for positive confirmation (mSigma