Immobilization of Î²-Galactosidases from - ACS Publications

Subscriber access provided by University of Newcastle, Australia

Article

Immobilization of #-galactosidases from Lactobacillus on chitin using chitin binding domain Mai Lan Mai Pham, Tatjana Leister, Hoang Anh Nguyen, Bien-Cuong Do, Tuan-Anh Pham, Dietmar Haltrich, Montarop Yamabhai, Thu-Ha Nguyen, and Tien-Thanh Nguyen J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04982 • Publication Date (Web): 20 Mar 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 23, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 49

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Immobilization of β-galactosidases from Lactobacillus on chitin using a

2

chitin-binding domain

3

Mai-Lan Pham1,3+, Tatjana Leister3+, Hoang Anh Nguyen2, Cuong Do-Bien1, Anh Pham-

4

Tuan1, Dietmar Haltrich3, Montarop Yamabhai4, Thu-Ha Nguyen3*, Tien-Thanh Nguyen1*

5 6

1

School of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Hanoi University of Science and Technology.

7

No.1, Daicoviet, Hanoi, Vietnam

8

2

Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Vietnam National University of Agriculture.

9

Trauquy, Gialam, Hanoi, Vietnam.

10

3

Food Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU University of

11

Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna.

12

Muthgasse 18, A-1190, Vienna, Austria

13

4

Molecular Biotechnology Laboratory, Suranaree University of Technology.

14

111 University Avenue, Nakhon Ratchasima Thailand

15 16

+

17

*

18

Tien-Thanh Nguyen

19

Phone/Fax : +84 3868 2470

20

Email: [email protected]

equally contributed to this publication Corresponding author

21 22

Thu-Ha Nguyen

23

Phone: +43 1 47654-75251

24

Email: [email protected]

25 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 2 of 49

26

ABSTRACT

27

Two β-galactosidases from Lactobacillus including a heterodimeric, LacLM type enzyme

28

from L. reuteri L103 and a homodimeric LacZ type β-galactosidase from L. bulgaricus

29

DSM 20081 were studied for immobilization on chitin using a carbohydrate-binding

30

domain (chitin-binding domain, ChBD) from a chitinolytic enzyme. Three recombinant

31

enzymes, namely LacLM-ChBD, ChBD-LacLM and LacZ-ChBD, were constructed and

32

successfully expressed in L. plantarum WCFS1. Depending on the structure of the

33

enzymes, either homodimeric or heterodimeric, as well as the positioning of the chitin-

34

binding domain in relation to the catalytic domains, i.e. upstream or downstream of the

35

main protein, the expression in the host strain as well as the immobilization on chitin

36

beads were different.

37

immobilization studies, thus a one-step immobilizing procedure could be performed to

38

achieve up to 100% yield of immobilization without the requirement of prior purification

39

of the enzyme. The immobilized-on-chitin enzymes were shown to be more stable than

40

the corresponding native enzymes; especially the immobilized LacZ from L. bulgaricus

41

DSM20081 could retain 50% of its activity when incubated at 37°C for 48 days.

42

Furthermore, the immobilized enzymes could be recycled for conversion up to 8 times

43

with the converting ability maintained at 80%. These results show the high potential for

44

application of these immobilized enzymes in lactose conversion on an industrial scale.

45

Keywords: β-galactosidase, Lactobacillus, immobilization, chitin- binding domain

Most constructs showed a high specificity for the chitin in

46

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 49


47

INTRODUCTION

48

Βeta-galactosidases (β-gal) (lactases, EC 3.2.1.23) are known as important enzymes for

49

applications in the dairy industry,1 where they are used for lactose hydrolysis to produce

50

low-lactose or lactose-free products as a response to lactose intolerance of consumers,

51

which affects approximately 70% of the world population.2 Another useful property of β-

52

gal is its transgalactosylation activity, by which health-promoting prebiotic galacto-

53

oligosaccharides (GOS) can be formed from lactose.1, 3 Many studies have demonstrated

54

the indirect health benefits of GOS, where GOS promote growth and activity of beneficial

55

intestinal microbes in the host.4-6

56

It is conceivable that β-gal from probiotic strains produce GOS that are also specific for

57

these probiotics 7 and therefore β-gals from several probiotic Bifidobacterium spp.8, 9 and

58

prominently Lactobacillus spp. such as L. reuteri, L. plantarum, L. sakei, L. pentosus, or

59

L. bulgaricus have been studied pertaining to GOS production during the last decade.10-14

60

Beta-galactosidases from Lactobacillus species are reported to be of two main types,

61

consisting of either two different subunits (heterodimeric or LacLM type) or two identical

62

subunits (homodimeric or LacZ type).15, 16 Two well-studied examples are the LacLM β-

63

gal from Lactobacillus reuteri L10314 and the LacZ β-gal from Lactobacillus delbrueckii

64

subsp. bulgaricus (L. bulgaricus) DSM 20081,16 both belonging to Glycoside Hydrolase

65

family GH2.

66

The recombinant β-gals from L. reuteri L103 and L. bulgaricus DSM20081 were

67

successfully developed and overexpressed in food-grade Lactobacillus hosts, 16-18 yielding

68

remarkably high levels of activity, for example ca. 23 kU to 53 kU per L of fermentation

69

broth, respectively.16,

70

recombinant β-gals from L. reuteri L103 and L. bulgaricus DSM 20081 were studied in

17

The lactose conversion towards GOS of both native and


Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16, 19-21

Page 4 of 49

71

detail both in batch and in continuous bioreactors.14,

72

achieved were approximately 38% of total sugars (at a lactose conversion rate of 80% and

73

an initial lactose concentration of ~200 g/L) using LacLM from L. reuteri L103,20 or 50%

74

GOS for recombinant LacZ from L. bulgaricus DSM 20081 (at 90–95% of lactose

75

conversion and an initial lactose concentration of ~200 g/L).16 These GOS mixtures

76

contained mainly (non-lactose) disaccharides, trisaccharides and tetrasaccharides, in

77

which the transferred galactosyl moiety is attached via β-1,3 and β-1,6-linkages. These

78

structures are important for potential prebiotics.20

79

In order to study the application of these enzymes in more detail we aimed at

80

immobilization of these two β-gals. To date, there have been no efforts on immobilization

81

of β-gal from L. reuteri L103, even though β-gals are well-studied enzymes in term of

82

immobilization.22 Immobilization will enable the reuse of these biocatalysts, and it might

83

also contribute to stabilization of the two β-gals, since their thermostability could be a

84

limiting factor for their application.23

85

The chitin-binding domain (ChBD) is part of some chitin or chitosan-degrading enzymes,

86

chitinases or chitosanases, where it is responsible for the tight binding of the enzyme onto

87

the substrate, thus increasing the hydrolytic activity. 24, 25 The ChBD of Bacillus circulans

88

WL-12 chitinase A1 was one of the most well studied carbohydrate-binding domains. It

89

belongs to the carbohydrate-binding module family 12 of the CAZY (carbohydrate-active

90

enzyme) database. The three dimensional structure of this ChBD have been determined by

91

NMR.26 It consists of 45 amino acids, Ala655-Gln699, including several hydrophobic and

92

aromatic residues with low solvent accessibility, thus forms the rigid and compact

93

structure.26 Two β-sheets is composed of five strands including Thr660-Tyr662, Gln666-

94

Tyr670, Lys673-Cys677, His681-Ser683 and Trp696-Leu698 residues.26 This ChBD has

Maximum GOS yields


Page 5 of 49


95

been reported to bind only insoluble or crystalline chitin but not to the chito-

96

oligosaccharide, soluble derivatives of chitin or other polysaccharides.27 Based on the

97

high affinity to chitin, ChBD from WL-12 have been successfully applied for

98

immobilization of several enzymes such as D-hydantoinase 28 or levansucrase 29 on chitin

99

material. The procedure for the simultaneously purification and immobilization was a

100

simple mixing the enzyme solution to the insoluble chitin without the requirement of

101

purified enzyme.

102

immobilization methods. For example, the covalent binding method immobilization

103

required the hash condition to create the bond between the enzyme molecule to the

104

support material.23 The absorption method bases on the weak forces like Van der Waals,

105

hydrophobic interaction or hydrogen interaction, thus the immobilized enzymes are

106

loosely bound to support materials.30

107

This study focuses on the immobilization of heterodimeric L. reuteri L103 LacLM and

108

homodimeric L. bulgaricus DSM20081 LacZ β-gal on chitin using ChBD of Bacillus

109

circulans WL-12 chitinase A1. The recombinant enzymes were fused to the ChBD via

110

DNA-based molecular methods. The biochemical characteristics of these fusion enzymes

111

in comparison to the native enzymes are shown, thus the effects of the ChBD and the

112

immobilization on the properties of these enzymes are elucidated.

113

MATERIALS AND METHODS

114

Chemicals and reagents

115

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise stated and

116

were of the highest quality available. The endonucleases were purchased from New

117

England BioLabs (Ipswich, MA) and used as recommended by the supplier. T4 DNA

118

ligase was from Fermentas (Vilnius, Lithuania).

28, 29

Moreover, this method can overcome the disadvantages of other



Page 6 of 49

119

Bacterial strains and media

120

The bacterial strains, plasmids and primers used in this study are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

121

Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS131 was grown in MRS medium (Oxoid, Basingstoke,

122

UK) at 37°C without agitation. Escherichia coli NEB5α (New England BioLabs,

123

Ipswich, MA) as cloning host was cultivated in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C with

124

shaking at 200 rpm. Agar media were prepared by adding 1.5% agar to the respective

125

media. Unless otherwise stated, the antibiotic concentrations were 5 µg/mL or 200 µg/mL

126

of erythromycin (Erm) for Lactobacillus or E. coli, respectively, and 100 µg/mL of

127

ampicillin for E. coli.

128

Oligonucleotide primers for PCR amplification were supplied by VBC-Biotech Service

129

GmbH (Vienna, Austria). The appropriate endonuclease restriction sites were introduced

130

in the forward and reverse primers (Table 2).

131

Plasmid construction and transformation

132

The DNA amplification was performed with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase

133

(Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland). Plasmid DNA from E. coli was purified using the Gene

134

Elute plasmid Miniprep kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). DNA was purified with the

135

WizardRSV Gel and PCR Clean-up system kit (Promega, Madison, WI). The pJET1.2

136

plasmid (CloneJET PCR cloning kit, Fermentas) was used for sub-cloning when

137

necessary.

138

Three recombinant fusion proteins were constructed. Two are based on LacLM from L.

139

reuteri L103, and the chitin-binding domain ChBD was attached upstream of LacL

140

(termed ChBD-LacLM) or downstream of LacM (termed LacLM-ChBD). The third

141

fusion protein was based on LacZ of L. bulgaricus DSM20081 with ChBD linked

142

downstream of LacZ (termed LacZ-ChBD).


Page 7 of 49


143

For construction of the expression plasmids of the fusion proteins LacLM-ChBD or LacZ-

144

ChBD, the fragment of chbd of Bacillus circulans WL-12 chitinase A1 was amplified

145

from the plasmid pTxB1 (New England BioLabs) with the primer pair F1 and R1 (Table

146

2). After double digestion with XhoI and Acc65I, this fragment was ligated to the

147

fragment of pSIP403,32 which contained gusA as the original reporter gene and was

148

treated by the same endonucleases, resulting in plasmid pSCBD-gusA (Table 1, Figure 1).

149

The gusA gene was then excised by double digestion with NcoI and XhoI to obtain the

150

empty vector pSCBD. This empty vector was ligated to the NcoI- and XhoI-fragment of

151

lacLM (encoding LacLM from L. reuteri L103) from pHA103.115 resulting in pSCBDlac1

152

(Table 1, Figure 1). Similarly, lacZ was amplified from pJETlacZ16 by PCR with the two

153

primers F4, R4 (Table 2), and then digested by BsmBI and XhoI prior to ligation into

154

empty pSCBD resulting in pSCBDlac3 (Table 1, Figure 1).

155

For the construction of the expression plasmid for ChBD-LacLM, chbd from pTxB1 was

156

amplified with the two primers F2 and R2, resulting in a fragment of F2-chbd-R2. The

157

lacLM gene was PCR-amplified from the lacLM template in pTH103.1 using the F3 and

158

R3 primers resulting in the fragment F3-lacLM-R3. Because of the 18 nt-complimentary

159

sequence between F3 and R2 (Table 2), the fragment F2-chbd-R2 could be used as a mega

160

forward primer in combination with R3 as reverse primer to amplify the F3-lacLM-R3

161

template, resulting in the fragment F2-chbd-lacLM-R3. The PCR product from this

162

amplification was digested by BsaI and XhoI and ligated to NcoI-XhoI digested pSIP403,

163

resulting in pSCBDlac2 (Table 1, Figure 1).

164

This strategy resulted in expression vectors, in which the target genes, lacLM or lacZ

165

linked to the chbd sequence, are controlled by the inducible promoter PsppA, similar to gusA

166

in the original pSIP403 vector.32 These plasmids were then electroporated into competent



Page 8 of 49

167

cells of L. plantarum WCFS1 as previously described.33 The transformants carrying the

168

plasmids were determined and screened by using a colony PCR amplification of the target

169

fusion genes.

170

Evaluation of the expression of recombinant β-galactosidases

171

This experiment was performed following a previous article.18

172

Fermentation

173

In order to obtain sufficient amount of the enzymes for characterization, immobilization

174

and application, L. plantarum WCFS1 harboring different plasmids was cultivated in 1

175

liter of medium to obtain larger amounts of the recombinant enzymes. The bacterial cells

176

were induced at OD600nm ~0.3 and harvested at OD600nm ~6. The cell pellets were

177

disrupted by homogenization with a French Press (Aminco, Silver Spring, MD). The cell-

178

free extract, clarified by ultracentrifugation (Beckman, USA) at 30000 × g for 20 min,

179

4°C, was used either directly for immobilization on chitin beads (New England BioLabs)

180

or for a single-step affinity purification using the p-aminobenzyl 1-thio-β-D-

181

galactopyranoside (ABTG) resin (Sigma) as described in a previous study.14

182

Immobilization on chitin beads

183

Before use, the chitin beads were washed three times with sodium phosphate buffer (50

184

mM, pH 6.5) and re-suspended in the same buffer. Five hundred microliters of chitin bead

185

suspension were mixed with the same volume of diluted cell-free crude extracts of 1000

186

U/mL of oNPG activity. The immobilization experiments were carried out at 4°C with

187

gentle agitation for 1 to 18 hours. Chitin beads were separated from the supernatant by

188

filtration and rinsed with sodium phosphate buffer. The supernatant and wash solutions

189

were collected and pooled for SDS-PAGE analysis and protein measurement. Chitin

190

beads were re-suspended in buffer for further studies.


Page 9 of 49


191

The immobilization yield (IY) and the activity retention (AR) were calculated according

192

to Klein et al.34 The IY (%) is defined as the ratio of immobilized activity in relation to

193

total applied activity, in which the immobilized activity was determined by subtraction of

194

the residual activity in the supernatant after immobilization from the total applied activity.

195

The AR (%) is the percentage of activity measured on chitin beads in relation to the

196

theoretical immobilized activity.

197

The amount of chitin-bound protein was indirectly estimated by subtraction of the protein

198

concentration in the supernatant after immobilization from that in the crude extract (prior

199

to the immobilization).

200

Influence of pH and temperature on activity and stability of the immobilized enzymes

201

The pH optimum of β-gal activity was evaluated in Briton-Robinson buffer 17 with the pH

202

ranging from 4 and 9. To determine the pH stability, the immobilized enzymes were

203

incubated at 30°C or 37°C in Briton-Robinson buffer of different pH values. At various

204

time intervals, the residual activities were measured with the oNPG assay. The

205

inactivation constants kin were obtained by linear regression of ln(residual activity) versus

206

time. The half-life values τ1/2 were calculated using τ1/2 = ln(2)/ kin 35.

207

The optimum temperature for hydrolysis activity of β-gals with both substrates lactose

208

and oNPG was determined in the range of 20°C and 80°C. For estimation of the kinetic

209

thermostability, enzymes were incubated in sodium phosphate buffer 50 mM pH 6.5 at

210

different temperatures ranging from 20°C to 80°C. At various time intervals, residual

211

activities were measured with oNPG as substrate and plotted versus the incubation time.

212

The half-life values of thermal inactivation (τ1/2) were similarly calculated as above.

213

Steady-state kinetic measurements



Page 10 of 49

214

To estimate the kinetic parameters of recombinant and fusion β-gals for lactose and

215

oNPG, substrate concentrations were varied from 1 to 25 mM for oNPG, and 10 to 600

216

mM for lactose.14 The enzyme assays were performed for 10 min at 30°C in 50 mM

217

sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5). The kinetic parameters were calculated by using the

218

Henri-Michaelis-Menten model and non-linear least-square regression.

219

Reusability of the immobilized enzymes

220

To assess the possibility of recycling the immobilized enzyme preparations for

221

conversion, immobilized β-gal LacLM L. reuteri L103 was added to sodium phosphate

222

buffer (50 mM, pH 6.5) containing 600 mM lactose and maintained at 30°C and 600 rpm

223

agitation for the conversion of lactose. Every 24 hours, the chitin beads carrying the

224

enzyme were filtered off and rinsed with buffer, and reused in another batch conversion

225

experiment under identical conditions. The filtrates from every conversion cycle were

226

collected to determine the glucose concentration by using a commercial D-glucose assay

227

kit (GOPOD Format, Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland). The glucose concentration in the

228

filtrate from the first conversion was taken as 100% of converting ability of the

229

immobilized enzyme preparation.

230

Immobilized LacZ from L. bulgaricus DSM 20081 was also tested for its reusability but

231

using the substrate oNPG. After 5 minutes of incubation with oNPG at 30°C, chitin beads

232

carrying LacZ were separated from the liquid phase and reused in the next conversion

233

experiments. The concentration of oNP in the liquid phases after the conversion was

234

measured with a spectrophotometer at 420 nm and used to calculate the residual

235

converting ability of enzyme in each repeating conversion.

236

Lactose hydrolysis and transgalactosylation experiments


Page 11 of 49


237

The transformation of lactose was carried out in batch mode. Both chitin-immobilized I-

238

LacLM-ChBD and purified soluble LacLM-ChBD were added at equal concentrations of

239

1.5 Ulactose/mL to sodium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.5) containing 10 mM MgCl2 and

240

205 g/L lactose. Lactose conversion experiments were performed at 30°C for 24 hours at

241

600 rpm of agitation.

242

The chitin-immobilized β-gal of L. bulgaricus was applied in different amounts ranging

243

from 1.7 to 9.7 Ulactose/mL to sodium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.5) containing 10

244

mM MgCl2 and 50 g/L or 205 g/L lactose. This enzyme preparation was also used for

245

conversion of lactose in ultra-high-temperature treated whole cow milk. The incubation

246

temperature was varied from 37 to 60°C.

247

In all conversion experiments, samples were periodically withdrawn, heated at 99°C for 5

248

minutes and further analyzed for lactose, galactose, glucose and galacto-oligosaccharides

249

(GOS) present in the samples. Qualitative analysis of sugar was performed by TLC as

250

described previously by Nguyen and co-workers.14 Furthermore, samples from conversion

251

experiments were quantitatively analyzed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography

252

(HPLC) (Dionex, Germany) equipped with a refractive index detector and an Aminex

253

HPX-87K (300 mm x 7.8 mm) carbohydrate analysis column (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). The

254

chromatographic separation was performed at 80°C with ultra-pure water used as eluting

255

solvent at a flow rate of 0.5 mL per min. The concentration of saccharides was calculated

256

by interpolation from external standards. Total GOS concentration was calculated by

257

subtraction of the quantified saccharides (lactose, glucose, galactose) from the initial

258

lactose concentration. The GOS yield (%) was defined as the percentage of GOS

259

produced in the samples compared to initial lactose.

260

β-galactosidase assay



Page 12 of 49

261

β-Galactosidase activity was determined using o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside

262

(oNPG) or lactose as substrates following Nguyen et al. (2006).14 In brief, the activity

263

assays were performed in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer of pH 6.5 at 30°C, and the

264

final substrate concentrations in the 10-min assays were 22 mM for oNPG and 600 mM

265

for lactose. One unit of oNPG activity was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing 1

266

µmol of oNP per minute, whereas one unit of lactase activity was defined as the amount

267

of enzyme releasing 1 µmol of D-glucose per minute under the given conditions.

268

Protein measurement

269

Protein concentration was determined by using the method of Bradford36 with bovine

270

serum albumin, BSA (Sigma) as standard.

271

SDS-PAGE analysis

272

For visual observation of the expression level of the recombinant β-gals in L. plantarum

273

WCFS1 and the effectiveness of the immobilization, cell-free extracts, liquid phases and

274

chitin beads (after immobilization) were analysed by SDS-PAGE using MOPS as running

275

buffer.16

276

Statistical Analysis

277

All experiments and measurements were performed at least in duplicate, and the data are

278

given as the mean ± standard deviation when appropriate. Student’s t test was used for the

279

comparison of data with significance value ∝ = 0.05.

280

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

281

Plasmid construction and expressions of recombinant β-galactosidases in L.

282

plantarum WCFS1


Page 13 of 49


283

In this work, the three expression plasmids pSCBDlac1, pSCBDlac2 and pSCBDlac3,

284

containing the sequences of the three recombinant fusion proteins LacLM-ChBD, ChBD-

285

LacLM and LacZ-ChBD, respectively, were constructed and successfully electroporated

286

into L. plantarum WCFS1. The transcription of the encoding sequences lacLM-chbd,

287

chbd-lacLM and lacZ-chbd is regulated by the inducible promoter PsppA in these plasmids

288

(Figure 1). The expression levels of the different constructs and the recombinant β-

289

galactosidases in L. plantarum WCFS1 were investigated.

290

Induced cells formed intracellular LacLM-ChBD at around 32 U per mL of fermentation

291

broth with a specific activity of ca. 179 U per mg protein (Table 3). ChBD-LacLM was

292

expressed in 3-fold lower yields (p

Immobilization of Î²-Galactosidases from - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents