Maritime Deposition of Organic and Inorganic Arsenic | Environmental

Subscriber access provided by Bethel University

Characterization of Natural and Affected Environments

Maritime deposition of organic and inorganic arsenic Laurie Savage, Manus Patrick Carey, Paul Nicholas Williams, and Andrew A. Meharg Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06335 • Publication Date (Web): 07 Jun 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 9, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Maritime deposition of organic and inorganic arsenic

2 3 4

Laurie Savage†, Manus Carey†, Paul N. Williams†, Andrew A. Meharg*†

5 6 7

† Institute

8

Building, Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5BN, Northern Ireland.

for Global Food Security, Queen’s University Belfast, David Keir

9 10

*

Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1


Page 2 of 32

11

ABSTRACT

12

The speciation of arsenic in wet and dry deposition are ambiguously

13

described in current literature. Presented here is a two-year study quantifying

14

arsenic species in atmospheric deposition collected daily from an E. Atlantic

15

coastal, semi-rural site, with comparative urban locations. Inorganic arsenic

16

(Asi) was the principal form of arsenic in wet deposition, with a mean

17

concentration of 0.54 mol/m3. Trimethylarsine oxide (TMAO) was found to

18

be the dominant form of organic arsenic, determined as above the LoD in

19

33%, of wet deposition samples, with a mean concentration of 0.12 mol/m3.

20

Comparison with co-deposited trace elements and prevailing weather

21

trajectories indicated that both anthropogenic and marine sources contribute

22

to atmospheric deposition. Analysis of dry deposition revealed it to be a less

23

significant input to the land-surface for Asi, contributing 32% of that deposited

24

by wet deposition. Dry deposition had a larger proportion of Asi than was

25

found in wet deposition, with TMAO making up only 12% of the sum of

26

species. In comparison, urban sites showed large spatial and temporal

27

variations in organic arsenic deposition, indicating that local sources of

28

methylated species may be likely, and that further understanding of biogenic

29

arsine evolution and degradation are required to adequately assess the

30

atmospheric arsenic burden and subsequent contribution to terrestrial

31

ecosystems.


2

Page 3 of 32


32

INTRODUCTION

33

Studies on arsenic speciation in deposition, wet or dry, are rare.1–3 Short-

34

term maritime studies have recently shown that organic arsenic species,

35

primarily trimethylarsine oxide (TMAO), are present in wet deposition at

36

~20% of sum of arsenic species.2,3 Weather trajectory modeling indicates

37

that the TMAO is of marine origin2,3, derived from the atmospheric

38

photooxidation of trimethylarsine (TMA)4, emitted from seawater3. Inorganic

39

arsenic (Asi) is the dominant species in atmospheric deposition1–3, but its

40

origin is less clear2,3. The sole continental arsenic speciation deposition

41

campaign reported in the literature found that Asi dominated, and that organic

42

species, again dominated by TMAO, were low and infrequent.1 The authors

43

attributed the presence of TMAO to phylosphere metabolism of Asi in their

44

forested site.1 Atmospheric particulate studies routinely pick up TMAO as the

45

major organic arsenic species4–6, but this has been hypothesized to be of

46

terrestrial origin, with soil microbes thought to be the source.5 Volcanic

47

emissions have also been considered a source for TMA/TMAO.7,8

48 49

The lack of arsenic speciation data in atmospheric deposition studies has

50

meant that the source modeling of atmospheric arsenic has been conducted

51

on totals9,10, potentially confounding industrial and natural emissions. This

52

confusion is exacerbated further by the poor understanding of natural

53

sources of atmospheric arsenic, which may enter the atmosphere in gaseous

54

form, including from biovolatilization and volcanic activity, or in particulate

55

form from volcanic activity in addition to ocean spray and soil dust entrained

56

to the atmosphere by wind.10–12 Mass balance modeling of the global


3


Page 4 of 32

57

atmospheric flux of arsenic determined a total input of 30.7 Gg yr-1. However,

58

this was calculated with the assumption that volcanic emissions were the

59

only significant natural source of atmospheric arsenic, ignoring other natural

60

sources and leading to only 2.1 Gg yr-1 of the calculated total as being of

61

natural origin.11 This calculation was conducted without the knowledge

62

garnered from recent studies that ~20% of arsenic in atmospheric deposition

63

is organic and of natural origin2,3, either from terrestrial or marine microbial

64

metabolism of arsenic.13–15

65 66

A review of global arsenic modeling noted10 that there is in an inherent

67

problem with arsenic flux calculations in that the actual data used was both

68

limited in scale/scope, and that where speciation was considered, antiquated

69

methodologies had been used. While short-term studies lead to a better

70

mechanistic understanding of arsenic deposition, in particular that there is

71

rapid washout of TMAO in wet deposition samples3, longer runs of data are

72

needed to conduct both yearly mass-balances, and to look at seasonal

73

variation. Also, arsenic speciation in the dry deposition of atmospheric

74

particulates is unstudied, and this omission is important for understanding

75

sourcing of arsenic species. Here we present a 2-year run of wet deposition,

76

and a 1-year run of dry deposition, arsenic speciation in a maritime setting

77

known to have a maritime TMAO input.3

78


4

Page 5 of 32


79

MATERIALS AND METHODS

80

Atmospheric deposition samples were collected from a semi-rural, non-

81

industrially impacted site in Northern Ireland, 54.617 N, -5.817 W (Figure 1)

82

over a two-year period from May 2015 to May 2017, with daily samples

83

collected in duplicate throughout year 1, and in triplicate throughout year 2.

84

To complement to the main site, three urban sites in were also sampled for

85

wet deposition, implementing the same sampling conditions outlined above

86

for the main site, for 2-5 months situated in domestic gardens within central

87

Belfast: site 1: 54.575 N, -5.957 W; site 2: 54.584 N, -5.948 W; site 3, 54.577

88

N, -5.933 W.

89 90

Samples were collected at a height of 1.5 m in a flat open-lawn location, 5 m

91

distant from hedge or tree cover, as shown in the equipment set-up in Figure

92

S1. Bulk deposition samples were collected in pre-weighed 56 mm diameter,

93

120 ml volume, polypropylene cups (supplied by VWR), as received from

94

supplier, which were capped and added to a freezer immediately after each

95

24-h collection period. The cups were disposable and were single use only,

96

to avoid microbial and chemical contamination. They were set in a wider

97

container (a colander) to provide stability. In the 2nd year of sample collection,

98

sample cups left for a 24-h period where no wet deposition was collected

99

were frozen in the same way. Dry sample cups were then treated with the

100

addition of Milli-Q water (>18.2 M Ω.cm), determined gravimetrically, with 1

101

ml of Milli-Q water added to each sample assigned for arsenic speciation

102

analysis and 4 ml added to sample cups assigned for analysis of trace


5


103

elements. These were then left overnight before preparation and analysis as

104

per wet depositional samples.

Page 6 of 32

105 106

All samples were weighed prior to sample preparation and volume of wet

107

deposition was determined gravimetrically. Analytical protocols for speciation

108

and multi-elements are given in detail in references 2 and 3. During year 1,

109

162 samples were analyzed for arsenic species, and a subset of 90 samples

110

were analyzed for trace elements (B, Na, Mg, K, V, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se,

111

Rb, Sr, I) by ICP-MS (Thermo Scientific ICAP-Q). in full-scan mode. In year

112

2, one sample from each daily set of triplicate samples was analyzed for

113

arsenic speciation, a 2nd sample was prepared with acid for trace element

114

analysis and the 3rd sample was treated with tetramethylammonium

115

hydroxide solution (TMAH) for iodine analysis.

116 117

Samples for arsenic speciation were 0.45 micron filtered directly into 1 ml

118

polypropylene vials, with hydrogen peroxide added to a final concentration of

119

0.3 % prior to analysis by ion chromatography (a Thermo Scientific AS7

120

column fitted to a Thermo Scientific IC5000 system) coupled to an ICP-MS

121

detector (Thermo Scientific ICAP-Q). A representative rainwater arsenic

122

speciation chromatogram of rainwater is given in Figure 2. Note, slight

123

differences in retention times, but this is normal variation and identify of

124

species in rain water was confirmed by spiking authentic standards into

125

rainwater samples, along with cross confirmatory cation exchange

126

chromatography for TMAO2. Dimethylarsinic acid (DMAA) was used as the

127

calibrant, as it sits in the middle of the species eluted. The limit of detection


6

Page 7 of 32


128

(LoD) derived from the DMAA calibration curve was calculated for each

129

batch. The highest LoD across all batches was determined and then applied

130

to give a uniform LoD across the whole data set. This was to avoid any

131

confounding of batch difference in LoD in subsequent statistical analysis

132

(Table S1). The average percent recovery of Asi from a synthetic surface

133

water certified reference material (CRM) (SPS-SW2, obtained from LGC,

134

Middlesex, UK), was 108% (n=142, standard error of mean=0.99%), Table

135

S1. CRMs were prepared in triplicate with each set of samples received by

136

the laboratory, with 2-3 sets of prepared samples then run with each

137

analytical batch (n=25). No CRMs were available of organic arsenic

138

speciation in waters.

139 140

Samples for analysis by full scan ICP-MS were 0.45 micron filtered before

141

further preparation. Samples for trace element determination by ICP-MS

142

were acidified to 0.1 M with nitric acid before analysis and for the analysis of

143

iodine by ICP-MS samples were prepared with TMAH (0.5%, m/m). All

144

analytical methods were carried out as per Savage et al.2

145 146

Potential arsenic contamination by bird feces or plant debris was controlled

147

as a replicate sample was always collected by an adjacent cup, samples

148

were then analyzed for both arsenic species via chromatography and for total

149

arsenic by direct scanning mode. The samples were tested for outliers using

150

the ROUT protocol (a new method based on robust nonlinear regression and

151

the false discovery rate) in GraphPad Prism (v. 6 for Mac), using a Q of 1%.


7


Page 8 of 32

152

For the logged data, which was used in subsequent linear regression

153

comparison between the two data sets (Figure 3), no outliers were identified.

154 155

Basic statistical analysis (regression, identification of outliers) was conducted

156

using GraphPad Prism. Factor analysis was conducted using SPSS (v.25)

157

using a correlation matrix, with equimax rotation. Weather back-trajectories

158

(72-h ) were calculated using Hysplit as per Savage et al2, and origins

159

determined, as shown in Figure 1.

160


8

Page 9 of 32


162

RESULTS

163

An illustrative rainwater chromatogram is shown in Figure 2. All potentially

164

expected arsenic species [monomethylarsonic acid (MMAA), DMAA, TMAO,

165

arsenobetaine (AsB), tetramethylarsonium (Tetra), arsenate (Asi)] separated,

166

with the exception of AsB and TMAO. A Thermo Scientific CS12A cation

167

exchange column was used to identify that the AS7 AsB/TMAO peak was

168

TMAO, as expected from our previous studies.2,3 MMAA and Tetra were not

169

found to be present above the LoD in any samples. At the semi-rural site,

170

DMAA was only found above the LoD in wet deposition on 3 sampling dates

171

over the 2-year period. TMAO was the second most frequently occurring

172

arsenic species, present in 104 out of 312 wet deposition samples. Asi

173

dominated arsenic species detected. The wet deposition concentrations of

174

Asi and TMAO, as well as wet deposition volume, for the 2-year period are

175

shown in Figure 4. Asi was the predominant form of arsenic in dry deposition,

176

found above the LoD in 170 out of 184 samples. This compared with only 59

177

samples from the same subset containing TMAO above the LoD. The sum of

178

arsenic species by speciation analysis had an 83% recovery when compared

179

to total arsenic by ICP-MS, a regression of the data (R2 = 0.55) is shown in

180

Figure 3. It is likely that particulate minerogenic arsenic constitutes the

181

difference between sum of species and total arsenic.

182 183

Bulk deposition of arsenic species was calculated by assuming concentration

184

values below the global arsenic species LoD (Table S1) to be half that value.

185

Minimum and maximum values were also calculated by ascribing sample

186

concentration for those below the LoD to be zero, or the LoD value,


9


Page 10 of 32

187

respectively. Table S2 shows the average concentration (mol/m3), average

188

daily deposition (nmol/m2/day) and annual flux (nmol/m2/year) for these three

189

scenarios for wet deposition samples in year 1 (n=162) and year 2 (n=150),

190

and for dry deposition samples collected in year 2 (n=184). For Asi

191

concentration per event, values ranged from 0.44 to 0.47 mol/m3 in year 1

192

wet deposition, 0.63 to 0.64 mol/m3 in year 2 wet deposition and 0.77 to

193

0.78 mol/m3 in year 2 dry deposition, when zero and the LoD were used in

194

this calculation for samples below LoD, respectively. For bulk deposition Asi

195

values for wet deposition were between 0.81 and 0.89 nmol/m2/day in year 1,

196

between 1.28 and 1.38 nmol/m3/day in year 2, and a single figure of 0.35

197

nmol/m2/day for dry deposition in year 2, when zero and the LoD were used

198

in this calculation for samples below LoD, respectively. The single figure in

199

place of a range for average dry deposition of Asi is due to there being very

200

few samples (n=14) below the LoD, meaning that the scenarios of accounting

201

for samples below the LoD with zero, half or full value of the LoD has

202

negligible effect. There was larger variation between average TMAO

203

concentrations under the different scenarios than was found for Asi, reflecting

204

the larger proportion of samples with TMAO below the LoD. For TMAO in wet

205

deposition, average concentration ranged from 0.09 to 0.15 mol/m3 in year

206

1 wet deposition and 0.09 to 0.14 mol/m3 in year 2 wet deposition. In dry

207

deposition the range was from 0.07 to 0.13 mol/m3 under the different

208

scenarios, with the almost 2-fold difference due to the small number of dry

209

deposition samples with TMAO above the LoD.

210


10

Page 11 of 32


211

The results presented in Table S2 show that rainwater accounts for a higher

212

proportion of the atmospheric deposition of all arsenic species than dry

213

deposition. When assuming samples below the LoD to be half the LoD value,

214

wet deposition accounted for 61.9 nmol/m2/yr of TMAO in year 1 and 37.9

215

nmol/m2/yr in year 2, compared to 8.89 nmol/m2/yr of TMAO from dry

216

deposition in year 2. Similarly, the annual contribution of Asi was also

217

considerably larger from wet deposition, with 265 nmol/m2/yr in year 1 and

218

200 nmol/m2/yr in year 2, compared to 63.9 nmol/m2/yr of Asi deposited from

219

dry deposition in the second year.

220 221

Year 2 was 30% drier than year 1, with 573 mm of wet deposition recorded,

222

compared to 823 mm, which was reflected in the sum of arsenic species

223

found in wet deposition, with 28% less arsenic found in year 2 than in year 1.

224

The decline disproportionately affected TMAO, with 39 % less recorded in

225

drier conditions compared to a reduction of 25% for Asi.

226 227

Asi and TMAO concentrations in wet deposition were plotted against each

228

other and against elemental analysis, and meteorological factors, in Figures

229

5 and 6, respectively, with only significant regressions shown. In Figure 5,

230

statistical analysis was carried out on the concentration (log mol/m3) of Asi

231

in wet deposition samples, for all samples with concentration of Asi

232

determined to be higher than the global speciated arsenic LoD (n=245).

233

Results below the global LoD were removed from this analysis.16 A

234

significant relationship between Asi in wet deposition and a number of

235

different elements and parameters was determined, with a positive trend with


11


Page 12 of 32

236

for boron, vanadium, manganese, zinc, selenium, strontium, iodine, as well

237

as with longitude (all P

Maritime Deposition of Organic and Inorganic Arsenic | Environmental

Recommend Documents