(PDF) Biosynthesis of L-Erythrose by Assembly

Full-Text Paper (PDF): Biosynthesis of L-Erythrose by Assembly of Two Key Enzymes in ... + 1. Jin-Ping Lin at East China University of Science and Tec...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF DURHAM

Article

Biosynthesis of L-Erythrose by Assembly of Two Key Enzymes in Gluconobacter oxydans Xingxing Zou, Yuhong Ren, Jinping Lin, Xinlei Mao, and Shengyun Zhao J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02201 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Jul 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 14, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Biosynthesis of L-Erythrose by Assembly of Two Key Enzymes in Gluconobacter oxydans Xingxing Zou‡,†, Jinping Lin‡,†, Xinlei Mao†, Shengyun Zhao§ and Yuhong Ren *,† †

State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, New World Institute of

Biotechnology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China. §

Fujian Key Laboratory of Eco-Industrial Green Technology, Wuyi University, Wuyishan, 354300, China

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

ABSTRACT: L-erythrose, a rare aldotetrose, possesses various pharmacological activities.

2

However, efficient L-erythrose production is challenging. Currently, L-erythrose is

3

produced by a two-step fermentation process from erythritol. Here, we describe a novel

4

strategy for the production of L-erythrose in Gluconobacter oxydans (G. oxydans) by

5

localizing the assembly of L-ribose isomerase (L-RI) to membrane-bound sorbitol

6

dehydrogenase (SDH) via the protein-peptide interactions of the PDZ domain and PDZ

7

ligand. To demonstrate this self-assembly, green fluorescent protein (GFP) replaced L-RI

8

and its movement to membrane-bound SDH was observed by fluorescence microscopy.

9

The final L-erythrose production was improved to 23.5 g/L with the stepwise metabolic

10

engineering of G. oxydans, which was 1.4-fold higher than that obtained using

11

co-expression of SDH and L-RI in G. oxydans. This self-assembly strategy shows

12

remarkable potential for further improvement of L-erythrose production.

13

KEYWORDS: L-erythrose; self-assembly; G. oxydans; protein–peptide interactions

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 25

Page 3 of 25

14

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

INTRODUCTION

15

Erythrose, a rare aldotetrose, contains two adjacent chiral carbon atoms.1 Several reports

16

show that erythrose possesses hypoglycemic effect. It also exhibits inhibitory effect on

17

cancer cells and may be used in treating cancer.2 2-Deoxy-L-erythrose, a derivative of

18

L-erythrose, possesses anti-HIV activity.3

19

Previous reports show that transketolases can produce L-erythrose from glyceraldehyde

20

and a combination of β-hydroxypyruvate and glyceraldehyde.4,5 However, this method is

21

not suitable for the production of L-erythrose because of its cost and low yield. Currently, a

22

report described a two-step reaction for producing L-erythrose.6 In the first step, erythritol

23

is completely oxidized to L-erythrulose using Gluconobacter frateurii IF0 3254.7 Next,

24

L-erythritol was isomerized to L-erythrose using the constitutive L-ribose isomerase (L-RI)

25

from a mutant strain of Acinetobacter sp. DL-28.8 However, the yield of L-erythrose from

26

L-erythrulose was only 18%.

27

Currently, methods involving single step synthesis of erythritol are limited. G. oxydans is

28

extensively used in synthetic biology methods for carbohydrate production because of the

29

efficiency of its membrane-bound dehydrogenase.9 The membrane-bound sorbitol

30

dehydrogenase (SDH) of G. oxydans converts erythritol to L-erythrulose, and a strain of G.

31

oxydans with high SDH activity, DSM2003, was obtained upon regulation of growth

32

conditions.10,11 SDH and L-RI are the key enzymes required for the synthesis of L-erythrose.

33

However, the active site of SDH is oriented towards the periplasm, and therefore,

34

substances that can be used as energy sources have to cross only the outer membrane to 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

35

access SDH.12 Moreover, L-RI is located within the cytoplasm. Therefore, heterologous

36

expression of L-RI alone is insufficient to achieve satisfactory yields of L-erythrose. To

37

shorten the spatial distance between SDH and L-RI in G. oxydans, strategies involving the

38

assembly of multienzyme cascades should be considered.

39

The substrate was delivered more conveniently when the spatial distance between the

40

enzymes was reduced.13 Strategies that involve enzyme fusion and modular scaffolds have

41

shortened the distance between proteins in many instances. However, loss of enzymatic

42

activity is a disadvantage of these strategies.14 Therefore, self-assembly using

43

protein-peptide interactions was developed as an alternative strategy.15

44

In this study, we developed a novel strategy for the production of L-erythrose by

45

positioning the assembly of L-RI to membrane-bound SDH in G. oxydans DSM2003. This

46

method significantly increased the production of L-erythrose, the details of which would be

47

discussed.

48 49

MATERIALS AND METHODS Construction of Fusion Genes

50

The target gene encoding L-RI was synthesized using codon optimization (Genscript

51

Biotechnology co., Ltd. Nanjing, China), while SDH was amplified from the cDNA derived

52

from the genome of G. oxydans DSM2003. Positioning was achieved using a normal

53

enzymatic assembly method.16 Oligonucleotide sequences of the PDZ domain17 were

54

previously constructed in our laboratory. The PDZ-ligand was fused to the reverse primer of

55

L-RI to generate the fragment L-RI-PDZlig. ER/K, a α-helical linker segment, was inserted 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 25

Page 5 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

56

between the SDH and PDZ fragments. Then, the sequences encoding PDZ-SDH or

57

L-RI-PDZlig were ligated to the PtufB promoter to produce fragments PtufB-PDZ-SDH and

58

PtufB-L-RI-PDZlig. Next, both the expression vector pBBR1MCS-5 and the fragment

59

PtufB-L-RI-PDZlig were double-digested with SacI and XbaI (Thermo Fisher Scientific,

60

Rockford, IL, USA) and ligated with T4 DNA ligase, yielding the plasmid

61

PtufB-L-RI-PDZlig (Figure S1A). The co-expression plasmid containing PtufB-PDZ-SDH

62

and PtufB-L-RI-PDZlig were constructed similarly (Figure S1B).

63

Bacterial Strain Construction

64

The two control plasmids were constructed to express L-RI with or without the PDZ ligand

65

fusion, and these were co-expressed with the plasmid expressing SDH-PDZ domain fusion

66

protein in G. oxydans DSM2003. All plasmids were transformed into G. oxydans DSM2003

67

using triparental conjugation18 as previously reported for heterologous protein expression.

68

Cells were collected by centrifuge, washed twice using pure water and stored at -18 °C.

69

Enzymatic Activity Assays

70

The activity of SDH and PDZ-SDH were evaluated by the L-erythrulose concentration. The

71

standard assay mixture contained 20 g/L freshly prepared erythritol (99%, Aladdin Chemistry

72

Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 20 g/L resting

73

cells (WCW). The reaction was performed at 30 °C for sampling per hour. The L-erythrulose

74

content was analyzed using high-pressure liquid chromatography (Agilent, 1100 series) and

75

detected using an ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) detector (Spectrasystem UV1000, λ = 210 nm).

76

To verify the effect of PDZ ligand on L-RI enzyme activity, vectors encoding L-RI 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

77

with/without the PDZ ligand were constructed. The standard assay mixture contained 8.5 g/L

78

freshly prepared L-erythrulose (85%, Aladdin Chemistry Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) in 100

79

mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 20 g/L resting cells (WCW). The reaction was

80

performed at 30 °C and samples were withdrawn every hour. The L-erythrose content was

81

analyzed using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and detected using an UV-vis

82

detector (Spectrasystem UV1000, λ = 210 nm).

83

Substrate Inhibition Assays

84

To determine the effect of substrate on the cells, different concentrations of erythritol were

85

used and the molar concentration of the solution was adjusted with NaCl to achieve the same

86

concentration of NaCl as in the control. Resting cells (50 g/L) were suspended in different

87

concentrations of erythritol solution for 20 h in a 4 °C refrigerator. 20 g/L erythritol was

88

catalyzed by the treated cells and the remaining catalytic activity of the cells was measured.

89

Fluorescence Localization Assays

90

Vectors expressing SDH and fusions of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) with the PDZ

91

domain or the PDZ ligand were co-expressed in G. oxydans DSM2003 to determine whether

92

the GFP-tagged protein localized to the membrane-bound SDH. The control strain expressed

93

GFP alone. Recombinant strains were cultured in sorbitol medium at 30 °C and 200 rpm for

94

20 h. The harvested cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.0)

95

and resuspended in 20 mM PBS. The resuspended cells were disrupted by sonication in the

96

presence of phenyl methane sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), a protease inhibitor. After

97

centrifugation at 12,000 g for 30 min, the supernatant was subjected to ultracentrifugation at 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 25

Page 7 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

98

40,000 g for 1 h (Himac CP-WX, Hitachi, Japan) to obtain the membrane fraction, which

99

were subsequently resuspended and visualized by epifluorescence (excitation, 469 nm;

100

emission, 525 nm). The fluorescence intensity of the membrane fractions were measured

101

using an automatic cellular imaging multifunctional detection system (Cytation3, Bio-Tek

102

Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).

103

L-RI Localization Assays

104

SDH with PDZ domain and L-RI with PDZ ligand were co-expressed in G. oxydans

105

DSM2003 to determine whether the L-RI was localized to the membrane-bound SDH; vector

106

expressing L-RI was used as control.

107

resting cells (WCW) in the same way as described above, and then used to catalyze 8.5 g/L

108

freshly prepared L-erythrulose. The reaction conditions and the detection method were as the

109

same as L-RI enzyme activity assays.

110

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Membrane components were extracted from 20 g/L

111

SDH is consisted of two hetero subunits (sldB, 13.7 KDa; and sldA, 77 KDa). The sldB is

112

located upstream of sldA gene.19 Hydrophobicity analysis of the sldB amino acid sequence

113

suggested that it has four transmembrane regions and the N-terminal of sldB is exposed to

114

cytoplasm. The self-assembly strategy was based on fusing a PDZ domain and its

115

corresponding ligand (PDZlig) to the N-termini of sldB and C-termini of L-RI, respectively,

116

yielding PDZ domain-SDH (SPd) and L-RI-PDZlig (LPl). The strategy for positioning the

117

assembly of SDH and L-RI is outlined in Figure 1.

118

Effect of pH on SDH and L-RI Activity 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

119

To investigate the effect of pH on erythritol oxidation, same concentration of G. oxydans

120

resting cells was used to transform 20 g/L erythritol. The initial pH of the reaction system

121

was adjusted to 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0 with 0.1 M NaOH and HCl solutions, as

122

required. The concentration of L-erythrulose in the reaction solution after one hour was

123

measured and the initial reaction rate was calculated. The results are shown in Figure S2A. At

124

initial reaction pH of 3.0 and 8.0, the initial reaction rate was approximately zero and the

125

reaction did not proceed. SDH was catalytically active in the pH range of 4.0-7.0 and

126

oxidized erythritol most rapidly at pH 5.0.

127

L-RI activity was measured at various pH in the range of 6.0 to 8.0, using the same

128

concentration of resting cells (WCW) that independently expressed L-RI to transform 20 g/L

129

L-erythrulose. The concentration of L-erythrose in the reaction solution was measured after

130

every three hours and the results are show in Figure S2B. The enzyme activity of LRI

131

increased with increase in pH from 6.0 to 8.0.

132

PDZ Domain or Ligand Fusion Alter the Enzymatic Activities

133

To examine the enzymatic activities of SPd and LPl, strains expressing SPd and LPl were

134

used; strains independently expressing SDH and L-RI were used as controls. The reactions

135

were performed at 30 °C for several hours with the same concentration of resting cells, and

136

the specific activities obtained are summarized in Figure 2. The specific activities of SPd and

137

LPl decreased by 36.1% and 21.2% compared to those of SDH and L-RI under the same

138

conditions. These results showed that fusion of SDH and L-RI with PDZ domain and ligand,

139

respectively, still remained most of their enzymatic activities. 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 25

Page 9 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

140

Verifying Positioning Assembly Using GFP-tagged PDZ Ligand and By Measuring the

141

Activity of L-RI in Membranes

142

To confirm the self-assembly, GFP was fused with PDZ ligand instead of LPl in the

143

co-expression strain (SGS); a strain expressing GFP alone (uSG) was used as a control. The

144

membrane fractions were in the sediment after ultracentrifugation. The sediment in which

145

GFP were located in the membrane fraction fluoresced green. To confirm assembly due to

146

GFP positioning, the membrane compositions were resuspended and visualized by

147

epifluorescence, (Figure 3A). To further delineate the changes in membrane compositions

148

between SGS and uSG, fluorescence intensity was measured using a microplate reader using

149

the same concentration of cells. As shown in Figure 3B, membrane composition of SGS

150

showed approximately 2-fold greater fluorescence intensity than uSG. The results indicated

151

that GFP could be localized to the membrane protein via protein-peptide interactions.

152

To further verify L-RI located on the membranes via the self-assembly of SDH and L-RI,

153

SPd and LPl were co-expressed in G. oxydans DSM2003 (SPP); vector expressing L-RI (uSL)

154

was used as control. The membrane fractions of SPP and uSL were extracted and the activity

155

of L-RI was measured. As shown in Figure 3C, the membranes of SPP showed significant

156

activity of L-RI, whereas the activity of L-RI in the control’s membranes was undetectable.

157

Although some L-RI was remained in the supernatant of the assembled cells, the activity of

158

L-RI in the supernatant (data not shown) was lower than that in the membranes of the

159

assembled cells. The result suggested that the most of L-RI was located on the membranes

160

via self-assembly with SDH.

9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

161

Self-assembly of SPd and LPl Enhanced L-Erythrose Production

162

For this cascade reaction catalyzed by SDH and L-RI, the activity of L-RI is much less than

163

SDH’s in G. oxydans DSM2003. Moreover, the expression level of L-RI was so low that its

164

band almost could not be identified by protein electrophoresis meaning that the amount of

165

L-RI was very low in the cytoplasm of cells. Therefore, it is important for improving the

166

catalytic efficiency by shortening the spatial distance between the SDH located in the

167

cytoplasmic membrane and the L-RI distributed in the cytoplasm.

168

Prior to the self-assembly experiments, SDH fused directly with L-RI via different linkers

169

was constructed to co-locate SDH and L-RI. However, the activity of these fusion proteins

170

could not be detected in G. oxydans DSM2003, suggesting that this strategy was not suitable

171

for the assembly of these two enzymes. Co-expression of SPd and LPl resulted in the

172

self-assembly of SDH and L-RI in G. oxydans DSM2003. The resting cells of SPP were used

173

to produce L-erythrose from L-erythritol, uSL was used as control. 10 g/L resting cells of

174

SPP and uSL were used to catalyze 10 g/L erythritol to L-erythrose, respectively (Figure 4).

175

The results showed that the self-assembly of SPd and LPl significantly increased L-erythrose

176

production during resting cell catalysis, resulting in higher L-erythrose production (220.34

177

mg/L) for SPP, whereas the production titer of uSL was 166.52 mg/L under the same

178

condition. The increase in yield in SPP may be benefit from the membrane located L-RI,

179

because, compared with uSL, L-erythrulose would arrive in the L-RI located on the

180

membrane more quickly than in the L-RI random distribution in cytoplasm once

181

L-erythrulose penetrated the cytoplasmic membrane. The results suggested that the reduction 10

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 25

Page 11 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

182

in intermediate product diffusion in the assembled cells lead to more efficient conversion of

183

the substrate to L-erythrose compared to the unassembled cells.

184

Optimizing the Catalytic Conditions

185

The L-erythrose yield at various temperatures using SPP and uSL were monitored and the

186

results are shown in Figure S3a. The L-erythrose production of SPP was more than that of

187

uSL at the same temperature. SPP produced the maximum amount of L-erythrose at 30°C,

188

which was selected as the final catalytic temperature for all future in vitro whole-cell

189

catalysis experiments. G. oxydans DSM2003 was exposed to different concentrations of

190

erythritol to test substrate inhibition. The relative activity of cells (compared to untreated

191

cells) decreased with increasing concentrations of erythritol (Figure S3b). The catalytic

192

activity was less than 30% when erythritol concentration was 150 g/L. To determine the

193

optimal cell concentration, different concentrations of G. oxydans DSM2003 were used for

194

catalyzing the conversion of 100 g/L erythritol under the same condition. The results are

195

shown in Figure S3c. The initial reaction rate increased with cell concentrations and peaked

196

at 50 g/L cell concentration (WCW).

197

After optimizing the catalytic conditions, SPP and uSL were used to catalyze reactions with

198

50 g/L WCW and 100 g/L erythritol at pH 7.0 and 30 °C. As shown in Figure 5, the substrate

199

was rapidly converted to L-erythrulose in the initial stages of the reaction, and the

200

consumption rate of SPP was slower than that of uSL between 0 and 12 h; however, the

201

substrate was completely transformed at 36 h. Finally, the reaction catalyzed by SPP resulted

202

in a titer of 23.5 g/L L-erythrose, which was 1.4-fold higher than that of uSL (17.2 g/L). 11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

203

These results suggested that the reduction in intermediate product diffusion in SPP lead to

204

more efficient conversion of the substrate to L-erythrose by LPl compared to that in uSL.

205

Self-assembly of SPd and LPl reduces the spatial distance between these two enzymes of the

206

L-erythrose biosynthetic cascade, which enhances the reaction yield by decreasing the

207

intermediate diffusion.

208

In this work, we used a protein pair to set a target on SDH, the L-RI was successfully

209

positioned on the membrane protein. By this assembly approach, the position in space of

210

these two enzymes was closed in the cells leading to increasing 1.4-fold the yield of

211

L-erythrose compared with the unassembled cells. The best titer of L-erythrose reached 23.5

212

g/L. This study shows the positioning assembly strategy in a heterologous production

213

pathway for L-erythrose synthesis in G. oxydans.

12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 25

Page 13 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

ABBREVIATIONS SDH,sorbitol dehydrogenase; L-RI, L-ribose isomerase; GFP, green fluorescent protein; PDZ, PDZ domain; PDZlig, ligand for PDZ domain; HPLC, high -performance liquid chromatography; WCW, wet cell weight.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

SUPPORTING INFORMATION The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website. Additional figures and tables

AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author * (Y. H. Ren) E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +86 21 6425 2163. Fax: +86 21 6425 0068.

Author Contributions The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

‡These authors contributed equally to this article. X. X. Zou and J. P. Lin designed and preformed most of experiments, participated in all data analysis, and drafted much of the manuscript. S. Y. Zhao provided advice on metabolic pathway analysis 13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

and molecular biology experiments. X. L. Mao provided advice on cultivation of G. oxydans. Y. H. Ren conceived the experiments, provided regular advice as the study progressed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding sources This work was funded by the National Special Fund for the State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering (2060204).

Notes The authors declare no competing financial interest.

14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 25

Page 15 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

REFERENCES

(1) Académie de Pharmacie (Paris). Journal de pharmacie et de chimie. Imprimeurs de l'Université royale de France: Paris, France, 1845. (2) Sener, A.; Devis, G.; Somers, G.; et al. The insulinotropic action of D-erythrose. Diabetologia, 1977, 13, 125-130. (3) Kruger, N.J.; von Schaewen, A. The oxidative pentose phosphate pathway: structure and organization. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 236-246. (4) Dickens, F.; Williamson, D.H. Formation of erythulose from hydroxypyruvate in the presence of yeast carboxylase. Nature, 1956, 178, 1349-1350. (5) Bongs, J.; Hahn, D.; Schörken, U.; et al. Continuous production of erythrulose using transketolase in a membrane reactor. Biotechnol. Lett. 1997, 19, 213-216. (6) Mizanur, R.M.D.; Takeshita, K.; Moshino, H.; et al. Production of L-erythrose via L-erythrulose from erythritol using microbial and enzymatic reactions. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2001, 92, 237-241. (7) Takeshita, K.; Shimonishi, T.; Izumori, K. Production of L-psicose from allitol by Gluconobacter frateurii IFO 3254. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1996, 81, 212-215. (8) Shimonishi, T.; Izumori, K. A new enzyme, L-ribose isomerase from Acinetobacter sp. strain DL-28. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1996, 81, 493-497. (9) Prust, C.; Hoffmeister, M.; Liesegang, H.; et al. Complete genome sequence of the acetic acid bacterium Gluconobacter oxydans. Nat. Biotechnol., 2005, 23,

15

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 16 of 25

195-200. (10) Moonmangmee, D.; Adachi, O.; Shinagawa, E.; et al. L-Erythrulose production by oxidative fermentation is catalyzed by PQQ-containing membrane-bound dehydrogenase. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2002, 66, 307-318. (11) Yang, X.P.; Wei, L.J.; Ye, J.B.; et al. A pyrroloquinoline quinine-dependent membrane-bound d-sorbitol dehydrogenase from Gluconobacter oxydans exhibits an ordered Bi Bi reaction mechanism. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 477, 206-210. (12)

Deppenmeier,

U.;

Hoffmeister,

M.;

Prust,

C.

Biochemistry

and

biotechnological applications of Gluconobacter strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 60, 233-242. (13) Wheeldon, I.; Minteer, S.D.; Banta, S.; et al. Substrate channeling as an approach to cascade reactions. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 299-309. (14) Lee, H.; DeLoache, W.C.; Dueber, J.E. Spatial organization of enzymes for metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 2012, 14, 242-251. (15) Liu, F.; Banta, S.; Chen, W. Functional assembly of a multi-enzyme methanol oxidation cascade on a surface-displayed trifunctional scaffold for enhanced NADH production. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 3766-3768. (16) Gao, X.; Yang, S.; Zhao, C.; et al. Artificial multienzyme supramolecular device: highly ordered self‐assembly of oligomeric enzymes in vitro and in vivo. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 14027-14030.

16

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(17) Lee, H.; DeLoache, W.C.; Dueber, J.E. Spatial organization of enzymes for metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 2012, 14, 242-251. (18) Hölscher, T.; Görisch, H. Knockout and overexpression of pyrroloquinoline quinone biosynthetic genes in Gluconobacter oxydans 621H. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 7668-7676. (19) Hoshino T,; Sugisawa T,; Shinjoh M, et al. Membrane-bound D-sorbitol dehydrogenase of Gluconobacter suboxydans IFO 3255—enzymatic and genetic characterization. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Proteins and Proteomics. 2003, 1647(1): 278-288.

17

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

FIGURE LEGENDS

Figure 1. Schematic view of the positioning assembly of L-RI and SDH due to the interaction between PDZ and its ligand, PDZlig.

Figure 2. The specific activities of SDH, SPd, L-RI, and LPl. (A) Gray and red shadows show the enzyme activity of SDH and SPd, respectively. (B) Gray and red shadows show the enzyme activity of L-RI and LPl, respectively. Activity values are the arithmetic mean of at least three different measurements. Error bars show the standard deviation of three measurements, ** denotes p < 0.01.

Figure 3. Visualization of membrane composition of SGS (left) and uSG (right) by inverted fluorescence microscopy (A). Fluorescence intensity of membrane compositions of SGS and uSG (B). The L-RI activities of membrane compositions of uSL and SPP (C). Each data point represents the mean ± standard deviation of three measurements, *** denotes p < 0.001.

Figure 4. Long-term catalysis reactions of strains SPP and uSL with 10 g/L substrate. Each data point represents the mean ± standard deviation of three measurements, ** denotes p < 0.01.

Figure 5. Long-term catalysis reactions of strains SPP and uSL at pH 7.0 (0.1 M sodium phosphate) and a substrate concentration of 100 g/L. The erythrose production of SPP (hollow squares) and uSL (solid squares), substrate consumption of SPP

18

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 25

Page 19 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(hollow circles) and uSL (solid circles), and intermediate product of SPP (hollow triangles) and uSL (solid triangles) are indicated. Each data point represents the mean ± standard deviation of three measurements.

19

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

FIGURE GRAPHICS Figure 1

20

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 25

Page 21 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 2

21

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 3

22

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 25

Page 23 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 4

23

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 5

24

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 24 of 25

Page 25 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

TABLE OF CONTENTS

25

ACS Paragon Plus Environment