Protein Fibrils Induce Emulsion Stabilization - ACS Publications

Feb 16, 2016 - concentrations by using rheology, diffusing wave spectroscopy, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Results showed that above a...
1 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by The University of British Columbia Library

Article

Protein fibrils induce emulsion stabilization Jinfeng Peng, Joana Ralfas Simon, Paul Venema, and Erik van der Linden Langmuir, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04341 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Feb 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 17, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Langmuir is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Langmuir

1

Protein fibrils induce emulsion stabilization

2

Jinfeng Peng, Joana Ralfas Simon, Paul Venema*, Erik van der Linden

3

Laboratory of Physics and Physical Chemistry of Foods, Department of Agrotechnology and

4

Food Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. BOX 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

5

Keywords: protein fibrils, emulsion, stable clusters, depletion stabilization

6

ABSTRACT

7

The behavior of an oil-in-water emulsion was studied in the presence of protein fibrils for a

8

wide range of fibril concentrations by using rheology, diffusing wave spectroscopy and confocal

9

laser scanning microscopy. Results showed that above a minimum fibril concentration, depletion

10

flocculation occurred, leading to oil droplet aggregation and enhanced creaming of the emulsion.

11

Upon further increasing the concentration of the protein fibrils, the emulsions were stabilized. In

12

this stable regime both aggregates of droplets and single droplets are present and these

13

aggregates are smaller than the aggregates in the flocculated emulsion samples at the lower fibril

14

concentrations. The size of the droplet aggregates in the stabilized emulsions is independent of

15

fibril concentration. In addition, the droplet aggregation was reversible upon dilution both by a

16

pH 2 HCl solution and by a fibril solution at the same concentration. The viscosity of the

17

emulsions containing fibrils was comparable to that of the pure fibril solution. Neither fibril

18

networks nor droplet gel networks were observed in our study. The stabilization mechanism of

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

Langmuir

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 35

19

emulsions containing long protein fibrils at high protein fibril concentrations points towards the

20

mechanism of a kinetic stabilization.

21

INTRODUCTION

22

Proteins have the ability to form various structures under different conditions. The

23

morphologies of these structures range from linear to spherical. One of the linear structures is

24

protein fibrils that can be formed using a wide range of proteins, such as, egg white proteins

25

(ovalbumin1 and lysozyme2), soy protein3, whey protein4 and pea protein5, when the appropriate

26

conditions are used. For example, when heating β-Lactoglobulin (β-lg) at low pH and low ionic

27

strength, the protein is first hydrolyzed into small peptides, and part of these peptides assemble

28

into fibrils.6, 7, 8 These fibrils typically have a diameter in the order of nanometers, a length in the

29

order of micrometers,9 and a persistence length around a micrometer.10, 11 Their high aspect ratio

30

and rod-like structure leads to a high excluded volume, 12 making them interesting candidates as

31

additives to colloidal dispersions.

32

The addition of non-adsorbing polymers to colloidal dispersions, can changes the stability of

33

the dispersion and has been frequently studied due to its fundamental aspects and wide range of

34

applications in different fields.13 Above a minimum polymer concentration, polymers can induce

35

depletion flocculation of the colloidal particles leading to phase separation.14, 15 The flocculation

36

rate increased with increasing polymer concentration, until reaching a critical concentration,

37

above which the rate of flocculation decreased with increasing polymer concentration. At high

38

enough polymer concentrations, the dispersion becomes stable. This phenomenon is known as

39

depletion stabilization.16 Rods have been found to induce a rich phase behavior in colloidal

40

dispersions.15,

41

emulsions.21 They suggested that the flocculation at low fibril concentrations was induced by

17, 18, 19, 20

Blijdensteijn et al. studied the behavior of rod-like protein fibrils in

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Langmuir

42

depletion interaction. Here we investigate the stabilization mechanism of emulsions at high fibril

43

concentrations, where the rod length and oil droplet diameter are comparable. Earlier studies on

44

depletion interaction mainly focused on relatively low concentration of rods, and the size of rods

45

being much smaller than that of the particles.15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 We use rheology, diffusing

46

wave spectroscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy as experimental techniques.

47

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

48

Whey protein isolate (WPI) solution preparation

49

WPI powder (Bipro, Davisco, Lot # JE 198-1-420, USA ) was dissolved in HCl solution of

50

pH 2 to prepare a stock solution of 10 wt % WPI. The solution was left overnight in a cold room

51

(4 °C) while mildly stirring using a magnetic stirring bar. After dissolution, the pH of the protein

52

solution was adjusted to pH 2 with a 6 M HCl solution. Subsequently, the protein solution was

53

filtered through a filter (FD 30/0.45 µm Ca-S from Schleicher & Schuell). The protein

54

concentration of the stock solution was determined using a UV spectrophotometer (Cary 50 Bio,

55

Varian) at a wavelength of 278 nm, and a calibration curve determined from WPI-solutions at

56

known concentrations. The WPI stock solution was stored at 4°C for further use in fibril

57

formation and emulsion preparation.

58

Fibril formation

59

The WPI stock solution was diluted to a protein concentration of 4 wt % with a HCl solution

60

at pH 2. The samples were placed in a heating block (RT 15 Power, IKA-WERKE) and stirred at

61

80°C for 22 hours to form fibrils. After this step the fibril solution was cooled down in ice-water

62

and afterwards stored at 4°C. The fibril concentration indicated throughout this paper refers to

63

the protein concentration before heating.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

Langmuir

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

64

Page 4 of 35

We note that for the preparation of the emulsions with 3.25 wt % fibrils we had to use a stock

65

solution of fibrils prepared at 4.5 wt % of protein. This does not affect the average fibril length.4

66

Oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion preparation

67

WPI was used as an emulsifier to prepare a 40% (v/v) o/w emulsion. The emulsion was

68

prepared in two steps. First, sunflower oil (Reddy, The Netherlands, obtained from a local

69

supermarket) was mixed with a 1 wt % WPI solution using a high speed blender ( Ultra Turrax,

70

T25 digital , IKA), at a speed of 9000 RPM for 5 minutes. Subsequently, the emulsion was

71

homogenized by 5 passes through a homogenizer (Labscope, Delta instruments, The

72

Netherlands) at a pressure of 70 bar. The emulsion was stored at 4 °C before use and all

73

experiments were performed within 12 hours after storage.

74

Sample preparation

75

A range of concentrations of protein fibrils were prepared by diluting the 4 wt % protein fibril

76

solution and the emulsion was added to those fibril solutions. The final volume percentage of

77

emulsion droplets in the mixture was 10 % (v/v). The concentration of protein fibrils in the

78

mixture were : 0 (no fibrils added), 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.25, 2.5 , 2.75, 3

79

or 3.25 wt %. The emulsion and protein fibril solution were mixed by mild agitation for 10 s.

80

Characterization of protein fibrils and emulsion

81

Length distribution of protein fibrils

82

The length distribution of the fibrils was determined using flow-induced birefringence. The

83

decay curves of the flow-induced birefringence after the cessation of flow were measured with a

84

strain-controlled ARES rheometer (Rheometrics Scientific) equipped with a modified optical

85

analysis module.29 From these decay curves the length distribution of the fibrils were

86

determined.30

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

87

Langmuir

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

88

TEM was used to image the protein fibrils. After a 100-fold dilution a droplet of the sample

89

was placed on a carbon film supported by a copper grid. After 15 s, the droplet was brought into

90

contact with a filter paper to remove most of the water. Subsequently, a droplet of 2% uranyl

91

acetate was added and removed after 15 s by another filter paper. Electron micrographs were

92

taken using a transmission electron microscope (JOEL JEM-1011, Tokyo, Japan).

93

Size distribution of oil droplets

94

The size distribution of oil droplets was measured using multi-angle static laser light scattering

95

(Mastersizer MS2000, Malvern Instruments). The average diameter of the oil droplets, D[3,2], was

96

around 1.9 ± 0.2 µm for all batches.

97

Characterization of emulsion stability

98

Visual observation

99

Samples were placed at room temperature (20 °C) and images were taken directly after

100

preparation (0 days) and after 1 day and 7 days.

101

Creaming stability

102

The emulsions were placed in glass tubes and monitored over time at 20 ᵒC. The

103

backscattering intensity of laser light as a function of height was measured (Turbiscan, MA

104

2000). The intensity profile was measured at times 0, 1 and 7 days. Interpretation of the data is

105

based on an analysis described elsewhere.21, 31

106

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)

107

The microstructure of the cream layer of samples after 1 day and 7 days was imaged using

108

CLSM (Zeiss 200 m Axiovert, Thornwood, NY, USA). Samples were placed in a chamber

109

prepared from a microscope glass slide (Menzel-glaser, 50 mm, Thermo Scientific,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

Langmuir

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 35

110

Braunschweig, Germany) and a cover slip (Menzel-Glaser, 15 mm × 15 mm, Thermo Scientific,

111

Braunschweig, Germany). Images were made using an oil immersion objective (Plan-

112

Apochromat, 100x/1.46 oil, Zeiss, Germany). One drop of 0.2 wt % Nile blue (Merck, Germany)

113

solution was added to the samples before imaging. Sample imaging was performed at an

114

excitation wavelength of 488 nm and an emission wavelength of 525 nm.

115

Viscosity

116

The viscosity of the samples was measured on a stress controlled rheometer (MCR302, Anton

117

Paar), using a concentric cylinder geometry (CC17/T1/S-SN38492). A solvent trap was used to

118

prevent evaporation. The samples were pre-sheared at a shear rate of 30 s-1. Subsequently, the

119

viscosity was monitored by increasing the shear rate from 0.01 to 500 s-1. Measurements were

120

performed at 20 °C.

121

Strain sweep

122

A strain sweep was performed on a stress controlled rheometer (MCR501, Anton Paar), using

123

a concentric cylinder geometry (CC17/T1-SN3951). A solvent trap was used to prevent

124

evaporation. The strain sweep was carried out at 20 °C, at frequency of 0.1 Hz varying strain

125

from 0.01% to 100%.

126

Diffusing wave spectroscopy (DWS)

127

In our study, DWS is used to monitor the diffusive motion of emulsion droplets at various

128

fibril concentrations. Dispersions of only fibrils are completely transparent, therefore, DWS is a

129

suitable technique to monitor the emulsion droplets.

130

The samples were analyzed directly after mixing using DWS in transmission mode. In DWS,

131

the intensity autocorrelation function g2(t) of the multiple scattered light is measured. Following

132

ref 32 g2(t) is related to the mobility of the emulsion droplets as

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

6

Page 7 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

133

134 135

Langmuir

∞ s   g 2 (t ) − 1 = β  ∫ P( s ) exp − 1 3 k 02 < ∆r 2 (t ) > *  ds  l    0

2

(1)

where it follows from the Siegert relation that

g 2 (t ) − 1 = β g1 (t )

2

(2)

136

Here β is a constant determined by the collection optics, P(s) is the path length distribution

137

function of paths of length s, k0 = 2πn/λ, with n the refractive index of the solvent and λ the

138

wavelength of the laser, is the mean square displacement of the droplets , and l* is the

139

photo transport mean free path.

140

The motion of the emulsion droplets, expressed by their mean square displacement (MSD)

141

can be obtained by numerically inverting the correlation functions and using Equation

142

Lk 1. Since it is convenient to work in scaled variables we define Q =  ∗ 0  < ∆r 2 (t ) > . L refers to  l 

143

the optical path length through the sample cell. In a purely viscous solution, the oil droplets

144

would undergo Brownian motion (unhindered diffusive colloidal motion) and Q2 would vary

145

linearly with time Q2 ~ Dt, where D is the diffusion constant. In a viscoelastic medium the short

146

time behavior of Q2 can generally be described by a power law < Q 2 (t ) > ≈ Dt p where D is the

147

diffusion constant, p is a measure for the viscoelastic properties of the matrix. When p ≤

148

matrix behaves like a medium where G’≥ G’’, when ½ < p