Subscriber access provided by UZH Hauptbibliothek / Zentralbibliothek Zuerich
Article
A novel “wave” signal smoothing and mercury removing device for laser ablation quadrupole and multiple collector ICP-MS analysis: application to lead isotope analysis Zhaochu Hu, Wen Zhang, Yongsheng Liu, Shan Gao, Ming Li, Keqing Zong, Haihong Chen, and Shenghong Hu Anal. Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/ac503749k • Publication Date (Web): 16 Dec 2014 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 21, 2014
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Analytical Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
1
A novel “wave” signal smoothing and mercury
2
removing device for laser ablation quadrupole and
3
multiple collector ICP-MS analysis: application to
4
lead isotope analysis
5 6
†,‡
Zhaochu Hu
†
†
†
†
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China
9
‡
The Beijing SHRIMP Center, Institute of Geology Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 102206, P.R. China
12 13 14 15 16 17
*Author to whom correspondence should be sent. E-mail:
zchu@vip.sina.com
Tel.: +86 27 61055600, Fax: +86 27 67885096
18 19 20 21
†
Chen , and Shenghong Hu
8
11
†
†
7
10
†
*, Wen Zhang , Yongsheng Liu , Shan Gao , Ming Li , Keqing Zong , Haihong
Submitted to Analytical Chemistry 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
22
For TOC only
23
24 25 26 27
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 26
Page 3 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
28
ABSTRACT:
29
A novel “wave” signal smoothing and mercury removing device has been developed
30
for laser ablation quadrupole and multiple collector ICP-MS analysis. With the
31
“wave” stabilizer that has been developed, the signal stability was improved by a
32
factor of 6.6 to 10, and no oscillation of the signal intensity was observed at a
33
repetition rate of 1 Hz. Another advantage of the “wave” stabilizer is that the signal
34
decay time is similar to that without the signal smoothing device (increased by only 1
35
to 2 s for a signal decay of approximately four orders of magnitude). Most of the
36
normalized elemental signals (relative to without the stabilizer) lie within the range of
37
0.95 to 1.0 with the “wave” stabilizer. Thus, the “wave” stabilizer device does not
38
significantly affect the aerosol transport efficiency. These findings indicate that this
39
device is well-suited for routine optimization of ICP-MS, as well as low repetition
40
rate laser ablation analysis, which provides smaller elemental fractionation and better
41
spatial resolution. With the “wave” signal smoothing and mercury removing device,
42
the mercury gas background is reduced by one order of magnitude. More importantly,
43
the
44
is reduced from 256 mv to 0.7 mv by the use of the “wave” signal smoothing and
45
mercury removing device. This result suggests that the mercury is almost completely
46
removed from the sample aerosol particles produced by laser ablation with the
47
operation of the “wave” mercury removing device. The “wave” mercury removing
48
device that we have designed is very important for Pb isotope ratio and accessory
49
mineral U-Pb dating analysis, where removal of the mercury from the background gas
202
Hg signal intensity produced in the sulfide standard MASS-1 by laser ablation
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
50
and sample aerosol particles is highly desired. The “wave” signal smoothing and
51
mercury removing device was applied successfully to the determination of the
52
206
53
Keywords: signal smoothing device, mercury removing device, lead isotope, laser
54
ablation, ICP-MS, MC-ICP-MS.
Pb/204Pb isotope ratio in samples with low Pb content and/or high Hg content.
55 56
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 26
Page 5 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
57
INTRODUCTION
58
Laser ablation is becoming one of the most important technologies for direct solid
59
sampling in analytical chemistry.1–4 In LA-ICP-MS analysis, it is well know that the
60
sample position in the ablation cell influences signal stability significantly in one
61
volume cell.5 In addition, laser ablation produced signals change quickly with time
62
during single hole ablation at a high repetition rate, which makes it difficult to
63
optimize the instrumental parameters for ICP-MS or MC-ICP-MS analysis.6 For
64
dating 5 µm zircon metamorphic rims, a lower laser ablation repetition rate such as 1
65
Hz is required6,7 Elemental fractionation is also significantly reduced at a lower laser
66
ablation repetition rate, because it is strongly related to the depth-to-diameter ratio of
67
the ablation crater.8 However, a lower repetition rate results in an unstable signal that
68
deteriorates the analytical precision. Due to the sequential nature of some ICP-MS
69
analysis (only one m/z value is detected at any one time), this may also lead to
70
undesired spectral skew when certain dwell times are chosen during data acquisition.9
71
Spectral skew is an error in relative signal levels for several m/z values across a
72
transient signal that arises from the need to scan a spectrum while the input sample
73
concentration is changing.9 This is especially true for the recently designed VOLM
74
chamber10, Laurin two-volume ablation cell11, MMG sample cell12, and laminar flow
75
ablation cell13 whose cell-related memory effects are significantly reduced. To
76
overcome these problems, Tunheng and Hirata14 developed novel baffled-type and
77
cyclone-type signal smoothing devices. These stabilizers can provide a smoother
78
signal at a repetition rate of 2 Hz, but the wash out time can become significantly 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 6 of 26
79
longer (approximately 20–40 s), and the resulting signal intensity is 15-20% lower. A
80
“squid” signal smoothing device (Laurin Technic, Australia) has been designed to
81
produce smooth signals even at very low laser repetition rates down to 1 Hz.11 This
82
“squid” signal smoothing device splits the carrier gas (He + Ar) and sample aerosol
83
line into ten tubes with optimally differing lengths. After recombination into one gas
84
line, a smoothed signal is produced. However, the washout time is improved by a
85
factor of 2.2 (from 4 s to 9 s for a signal decay of 5 orders of magnitude). Hu et al.6
86
have developed a simple “wire” signal smoothing device for LA-ICP-MS analysis.
87
With this “wire” signal smoothing device, no oscillation of the signal intensity was
88
observed, even at a repetition rate of 1 Hz. This “wire” signal smoothing device has
89
been used successfully for high spatial resolution U-Pb dating in zircon at low
90
repetition rates of 1 to 2 Hz. Compared to other signal smoothing devices, the
91
significant advantage of the “wire” smoothing device is that the signal washout time
92
is similar to that without the signal smoothing device. However, the “wire” stabilizer
93
device acts as a “particle filter” to a certain extent because the resulting signal
94
intensity achieved with the stabilizer is lower than that without the stabilizer (10-30%).
95
From the above observation, the trade-off between signal intensity and wash out time
96
is clearly a matter of compromise, which should be carefully considered during the
97
design of the signal smoothing device.
98
Lead isotope analysis in glass, sulfide minerals and feldspar and U-Pb dating of
99
accessory minerals (e.g., zircon) are very popular applications of LA-MC-ICP-MS /
100
LA-ICP-MS in the earth sciences.15–20 For correction of common-Pb using the 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
204
Pb
Page 7 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
204
101
intensity in accessory minerals U-Pb dating, a small variation in the
102
can produce a large uncertainty in signal intensities for radiogenic
103
components.21 Precise determination of the signal intensity of
104
important. However,
105
interference with 204Hg. Reduction of the mercury background in the ICP-MS is thus
106
highly desirable. Mercury may be present in the Ar and He gases. Reduction of the
107
Hg signal can be achieved by filtering the Ar and He gas using activated charcoal19,
108
gold-coated sand20 or gold-coated glass wool22. A reduction of approximately 50% in
109
Hg signal is achieved by using these devices. Hirata et al.21 have developed a novel
110
Hg-trapping device using an activated charcoal. Higher reduction efficiency of Hg
111
signals was obtained with a larger volume of activated charcoal. For example, the Hg
112
signals were reduced by a factor of 3 with a volume of charcoal filter of 200 ml.
113
However, too high a volume of charcoal filter (e.g., 400 ml) resulted in lowering the
114
signal intensity of Pb and U (approximately 40%). Aside from Ar and He gases, Hg
115
also may be present in many mineral samples such as sulfides. Thus, removing Hg
116
from laser ablation produced sample aerosol particles during lead isotope and U-Pb
117
dating analysis is also highly desirable.
204
207
Pb intensity
Pb and
206
Pb
Pb is thus highly
204
Pb has the lowest isotopic abundance and share an isobaric
118
In this study, we have designed a novel “wave” signal smoothing and mercury
119
removing device for laser ablation ICP-MS analysis. The performance of the “wave”
120
signal smoothing and mercury removing device was evaluated based on signal
121
stabilities, signal intensities, washout time and the reduction efficiency of Hg. In the
122
end, we applied this device to lead isotope analysis in sulfides and glasses by using 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
123
laser ablation MC-ICP-MS.
124 125
EXPERIMENTS
126
Instrumentation.
127
Experiments were conducted using an Agilent 7500a ICP-MS (Agilent Technology,
128
Tokyo, Japan) and a NEPTUNE Plus MC-ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific,
129
Germany), which are connected to a Geolas 2005 excimer ArF laser ablation system
130
(Lambda Physik, Göttingen, Germany) at the State Key Laboratory of Geological
131
Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences in Wuhan. The
132
standard ablation cell in the GeoLas 2005 system is a closed design cell and consists
133
basically of a cylinder with a volume of approx. 51 cm3 with an inlet nozzle (i.d. < 0.5
134
mm) and a gas outlet (i.d. 1.8 mm). The energy density of the laser ablation that was
135
used in this study was 5.0 J cm-2. Helium was used as the carrier gas within the
136
ablation cell and was merged with argon (makeup gas) after the ablation cell. Details
137
of the instrumental operating conditions and measurement parameters are summarized
138
in Table 1.
139 140
“Wave” signal smoothing and mercury removing device.
141
Figure 1 illustrates the schematic diagram of the “wave” signal smoothing and
142
mercury removing device (a) and the connection position of the smoother in the
143
LA-ICP-MS system (b). The “wave” device essentially consists of a stainless steel
144
cylinder filled with nine smoothing elements, with a volume of approximately 94 cm3. 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 26
Page 9 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
145
Each smoothing element consists of seven intersecting corrugated plates (thickness:
146
0.15 mm; corrugation angle: 45°; wave height: 4 mm; pitch of waves: 7 mm) (Figure
147
1a). The length of seven corrugated plates is fixed at 30 mm. The widths of the seven
148
corrugated plates are 9 mm, 14 mm, 18 mm, 20 mm, 18 mm, 14 mm and 9 mm,
149
respectively. In position A, only the He carrier gas flows through the stabilizer,
150
whereas in position B, both the He carrier gas and the Ar makeup gas flow through
151
the stabilizer.
152
The surface of all the corrugated plates and the inner surface of the stainless steel
153
cylinder were coated with ultrapure gold. The thickness of the gold coating is
154
approximately 10 µm. The mercury in the carrier gas is expected to be trapped by the
155
gold during transport through the “wave” stabilizer, in which the mercury frequently
156
collides with the gold surface of the corrugated plates and the stainless steel cylinder.
157 158
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
159
Effect on signal stability.
160
Figure 2 shows the U signal profile produced by continuous ablation of the NIST
161
SRM 610 glass at a repetition rate of 1 Hz and a spot size of 60 µm with and without
162
the “wave” device at position A and B. It can be seen that a smooth signal is obtained
163
even at a repetition rate of 1 Hz by using the “wave” device. The stability of the U
164
signal is improved from 18.6% to 2.81% and 1.85% for the “wave” device at
165
positions A and B, respectively. The magnitude of the variability was calculated by
166
subtracting the mean intensity estimated by the exponential decay pattern.14 When the 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
167
laser ablation produced aerosol particles are transported into the “wave” device, the
168
aerosol stream is divided into many parts and deflected in different directions by the
169
first smoothing elements, and these different aerosol parts continue to recombine and
170
re-separate while passing through another eight smoothing elements. The different
171
traveling pathways of the laser ablation produced sample aerosol particles in the
172
“wave” device which lead to different exit times, defined as the time needed for the
173
aerosol particles to travel through the stabilizer, that ultimately contribute to the
174
stabilization. As shown in Figure 2, the stability of the U signal intensity in position A
175
(1.85%) is better than that in position B (2.81%). This should be attributed to the
176
reduced residence time of the sample aerosol particles in “wave” stabilizer in position
177
B than that in position A due to the increased carrier gas flow rate in position B (He +
178
Ar), which subsequently reduces the difference in exit time for the different parts of
179
the sample aerosol in the stabilizer. This result also suggests that the expected
180
improvement of signal smoothing by the mixing of He and Ar in the “wave” stabilizer
181
is limited, which cannot compensate for the reduced smoothing effect due to the
182
reduced exit time difference among the different aerosol particles in position B (He +
183
Ar).
184 185
Effect on washout time.
186
The washout time refers to the time required for the signal to drop back to background
187
levels after cessation of ablation. For high spatial resolution and high sample
188
throughput analysis, the washout time should be as short as possible for the designed 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 26
Page 11 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
189
signal smoothing device. Compare to that without “wave” stabilizer, the washout time
190
is increased by 1 s and 2 s for signal decay of approximately 4 orders of magnitude
191
with the “wave” stabilizer at position B and position A, respectively (Figure 3). This
192
result indicates that the “wave” signal stabilizer has a limited effect on washout time.
193
In comparison with previously developed signal stabilizers such as the baffled-type
194
stabilizer14, the cyclone-type stabilizer14 and the “squid” signal stabilizer11, this is an
195
important advantage for our designed “wave” signal stabilizer.
196 197
Effect on signal intensity.
198
Figure 4 shows the normalized signal intensities of 63 elements (relative to without
199
the stabilizer) at different test times. These signals were produced using a laser
200
ablation repetition rate of 6 Hz lasting 50 s at a spot size of 44 µm on the glass
201
standard NIST SRM 610. It would be better if the designed “wave” stabilizer device
202
did not affect the signal intensity or remove aerosols in an elementally selective way.
203
It can be seen that most of the normalized elemental signals lie within the range of
204
0.95 to 1.0. Compared with previously developed signal stabilizers, such as the
205
baffled-type stabilizer14, the cyclone-type stabilizer14 and the “wire” signal stabilizer6,
206
this is an important advantage for the designed “wave” signal stabilizer.
207
111
208
66
209
when measured at different times. The reason for this is unclear. Further work on the
210
Zn, Cd, Sb and Te deposition is needed to identify the specific mechanisms. The large
Cd,
Zn,
121
111
Sb and 126Te and
Cd,
121
195
66
Zn,
103
Rh,
Pt are significant exceptions. The normalized signals of
Sb and 126Te are consistently lower (lie within the range of 0.90-0.95)
11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 12 of 26
211
variation ranges for 103Rh and 195Pt (0.93–1.16) may be related to their heterogeneous
212
distribution in NIST 610 glass.23,24 These results suggest that the “wave” stabilizer
213
does not significantly affect the aerosol transport efficiency and remove aerosols in an
214
elementally selective way for the operating conditions used in this study.
215 216 217
Removing Hg from the carrier gas and the sample aerosol. Figure 5 shows the
202
Hg, 204Pb and 208Pb signal profile produced by laser ablation
218
of the MASS-1 sulfide standard at a repetition rate of 8 Hz with and without the
219
“wave” device at position A using MC-ICP-MS. It can be seen that the gas
220
background of mercury in LA-MC-ICP-MS is reduced from 6 mv to 0.5 mv by using
221
the “wave” device. This reduction is important for Pb isotope and U-Pb dating
222
analysis in samples with a low Pb content using LA-MC-ICP-MS. The mercury
223
content is 57 µg g-1 in MASS-1. The laser ablation produced 202Hg signal intensity in
224
MASS-1 is 256 mv and 0.7 mv for without and with the “wave” device, respectively.
225
A reduction factor of 366 for the
226
the Hg is also almost completely removed from the laser ablation produced sample
227
aerosol particles. In contrast, the signal intensity of
228
without the “wave” device. We propose that Hg is enriched and transported primarily
229
in the small particulate form due to its volatility and hence can interact well with the
230
gold coating on the surfaces of the different corrugated plates in the smoothing
231
elements and the inner surface of the stainless steel cylinder compared to other more
232
refractory elements such as Pb, which are transported predominantly as normal solid
202
Hg signal was obtained. This result suggests that
208
Pb is similar for both with and
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
233
aerosol particles. However, the mechanisms that cause this effect need further
234
investigation.
235 236
Application to lead isotope analysis.
237
Lead isotopes have been widely applied for the fingerprinting and identification of
238
geological processes.17,18 LA-MC-ICP-MS is one of the most powerful tools for lead
239
isotopic analysis.15–18 The low abundance of 204Pb (~1.4% of all common Pb) and the
240
isobaric interference of
241
the main problems in obtaining the high precision measurements of the
242
206/207/208
243
the determined
244
NIST SRM 614, AHTO-G, StHs6/80, T1-G ), sulfide standard MASS-1, and natural
245
sphalerite ZnS-1 from reference values both with and without the “wave” device. It
246
can be seen from Figure 6 that the agreement between our data obtained with the
247
“wave” device was much better than the data obtained without the mercury removing
248
device. This is particularly true for low Pb content samples ML3B-G (Pb = 1.38 µg
249
g-1), BHVO-2G (Pb = 1.70 µg g-1), NIST SRM 614 (Pb = 2.32 µg g-1) and AHTO-G
250
(Pb = 5.67 µg g-1). For high Hg content sample MASS-1 (Hg = 57 µg g-1), the
251
determined
252
value by 1% without use of the “wave” signal smoothing and mercury removing
253
device. Excellent agreement between the determined values and the reference value in
254
MASS-1 is obtained by using our developed mercury removing device. The
204
Hg from the carrier gas and samples are considered to be
Pb/204Pb by using LA-MC-ICP-MS. Figure 6 shows the relative deviation of
206
206
Pb/204Pb isotope ratios in glass standards (ML3B-G, BHVO-2G,
Pb/204Pb values in MASS-1 are consistently higher than the reference
13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
255
206
Pb/204Pb isotope ratios determined in natural sphalerite ZnS-1 are scattered for
256
different laser ablation spot analyses without the “wave” device because the Hg and
257
Pb contents are highly varied for different laser ablation sampling locations in natural
258
sphalerite sample ZnS-1 (204Hg/204Pb = 0.186-6.419). By using our mercury removing
259
device, the
260
locations in natural sphalerite sample ZnS-1 are very consistent. These results
261
demonstrate that the “wave” device that we have developed is well suited for lead
262
isotope analysis in low Pb content samples and/or high Hg content samples.
206
Pb/204Pb isotope ratios determined in different laser ablation sampling
263 264
CONCLUSIONS
265
The “wave” signal smoothing and mercury removing device that we developed is
266
able to provide smooth signals even at a low laser repetition rate of 1 Hz, which
267
makes it well suited for routine optimization of LA-ICP-MS and LA-MC-ICP-MS as
268
well as low repetition rate laser ablation analysis. Not only the mercury in the carrier
269
gas was effectively removed, but also the mercury in the laser ablation produced
270
sample aerosols was significantly removed. This reduction of the mercury signal is
271
important for lead isotopes and for U-Pb dating analysis by LA-MC-ICP-MS where
272
low
273
“wave” signal smoothing and mercury removing device has been used successfully
274
for lead isotope analysis in low Pb content samples, as well as in high Hg content
275
samples.
204
Hg signals are necessary for precise and accurate analyses. The developed
276 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 26
Page 15 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
277
AUTHOR INFORMATION
278
*Corresponding Author
279
E-mail: zchu@vip.sina.com. Tel.: +86 27 61055600, Fax: +86 27 67885096
280
Author Contributions
281
The manuscript was written through the contributions of all of the authors. All the
282
authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
283
Notes
284
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
285 286
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
287
We thank Klaus Peter Jochum for providing MPI-DING reference glasses.
288
Thoughtful comments by Reinhard Niessner and two anonymous referees have
289
significantly improved the manuscript. This research is supported by the National
290
Nature Science Foundation of China (Grants 41273030, 41322023, and 41373026),
291
the Fundamental Research Funds for National Universities, the CERS-China
292
Equipment and Education Resources System (CERS-1-81), the State Administration
293
of the Foreign Experts Affairs of China (B07039), the Opening Foundation of the
294
Beijing SHRIMP Center (National Science and Technology Infrastructure), and the
295
MOST Special Fund from the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and
296
Mineral Resources.
297
15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
298
REFERENCES
299
(1) Russo, R. E.; Mao, X. L.; Liu, H. C.; Gonzalez J.; Mao, S. S. Talanta, 2002, 57, 425–451.
300
(2) Günther D.; Hattendorf, B. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem., 2005, 24, 255–265.
301
(3) Shaheen, M. E.; Gagnon, J. E.; Fryer, B. J. Chem. Geol., 2012, 330–331, 260–273.
302
(4) Orellana, F. A.; Gálvez, C. G.; Orellana, F. A.; Gálvez, C. G.; Roldán, M. T.; García-Ruiz, C.;
303
Roldán, M. T.; García-Ruiz, C. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem., 2013, 42, 1–34.
304
(5) Bleiner, D.; Günther, D. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2001, 16, 449–456.
305
(6) Hu, Z. C.; Liu, Y. S.; Gao, S.; Xiao, S. Q.; Zhao, L. S., Günther, D.; Li, M.; Zhang, W.; Zong,
306
K. Q. Spectrochimica Acta Part B, 2012, 78, 50–57.
307
(7) Cottle, J. M.; Horstwood, M. S. A.; Parrish, R. R. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2009, 24, 1355–1363.
308
(8) Mank, A. J. G.; Mason, P. R. D.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1999, 14, 1143–1153.
309
(9) Schilling, G. D.; Andrade, F. J.; Barnes, J. H.; Sperline, R. P.; Denton, M. B.; Barinaga, C.J.;
310 311 312
Koppenaal, D. W.; Hieftje, G. M. Anal. Chem., 2007, 79, 7662–7668. (10) Liu, Y. S.; Hu, Z. C.; Yuan, H. L.; Hu, S. H.; Chen, H. H. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2007, 22, 582–585.
313
(11) Müller, W.; Shelley, M.; Miller, P.; Broude, S. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2009, 24, 209–214.
314
(12) Fricker, M. B.; Kutscher, D.; Aeschlimann, B.; Frommer, J.; Dietiker, R.; Bettmer, J.;
315
Günther, D. Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 2011, 307, 39–45.
316
(13) Gurevich, E. L.; Hergenröder, R. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2007, 22, 1043–1050.
317
(14) Tunheng, A.; Hirata, T. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2004, 19, 932–934.
318
(15) Woodhead, J.; Hergt, J.; Meffre, S.; Large, R. R.; Danyushevsky, L.; Gilbert, S. Chem. Geol.,
319
2009, 262(3–4), 344–354. 16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 26
Page 17 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
320
(16) Souders, A. K.; Sylvester, P. J. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2010, 25(7), 975–988.
321
(17) Darling, J. R.; Storey, C. D.; Hawkesworth, C. J.; Lightfoot, P. C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta,
322 323 324
2012, 99, 1–17. (18) Standish, C.; Dhuime, B.; Chapman, R.; Coath, C.; Hawkesworth, C.; Pike, A. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(2), 217–225.
325
(19) Hirata, T.; Nesbitt, R. W. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1995, 59, 2491–2500.
326
(20) Jackson, S. E.; Pearson, N. J.; Griffin, W. L.; Belousova, E. A. Chem. Geol., 2004, 211,
327
47–69.
328
(21) Hirata, T.; Iizuka, T.; Orihashi, Y. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2005, 20, 696–701.
329
(22) Zhang, L.; Ren, Z. Y.; Nichols, A. R. L.; Zhang, Y. H.; Zhang, Y.; Qian, S. P.; Liu, J. Q. J.
330
Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29, 1393–1405.
331
(23) Eggins, S.M.; Shelley, J.M.G.; Geostand. Newslett., 2002, 26, 269–286.
332
(24) Hu, Z. C., Liu,Y. S., Li, M., Gao, S.; Zhao, L.S.; Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2009, 33,
333
319–335.
334 335 336 337
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
338 339 340
Table 1 Summary of the operating conditions used for LA-ICP-MS measurements. GeoLas Laser ablation system Wavelength
193 nm, Excimer laser
Repetition rate
1, 6, 8 Hz
Pulse length
15 ns
Energy density
5 J cm-2
Spot sizes
44, 60, 90 µm
Ablation cell gas
Helium
Makeup gas
Argon
Agilent 7500a ICP-MS RF power
1350 W
Plasma gas flow rate
14.0 l min-1
Auxiliary gas flow rate
1.0 l min-1
Sampling depth
5.0 mm
Ion optic settings
Typical
Dwell time per isotope
10 ms
Detector mode
Dual
Neptune Plus RF Power
1250 W
Plasma gas flow rate
16.0 l min-1
Auxiliary gas flow rate
0.9 l min-1
Instrument resolution
400 (low)
Block number
1
cycles of each block
200
Integration Time (s)
0.524 s
341 342 343
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 26
Page 19 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
344
Figure captions
345
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of (a) the “wave” signal smoothing and mercury
346
removing device and (b) the connection position of the smoother (position A or
347
position B) in the LA-ICP-MS system. In position A, only the helium carrier gas
348
flows through the stabilizer. In position B, both the helium carrier gas and the argon
349
makeup gas flow through the stabilizer.
350
Figure 2. Uranium signal profile produced by continuous laser ablation without and
351
with “wave” device in position A (a) and position B (b). Signals were acquired using
352
a repetition rate of 1 Hz and a spot size of 60 µm in NIST 610.
353
Figure 3. Comparison of the aerosol washout time after 50 s of laser ablation without
354
and with the “wave” signal smoothing device at position A (a) and position B (b).
355
Figure 4. Signal intensities of 63 elements obtained with the “wave” signal stabilizer
356
normalized to conditions without the “wave” signal stabilizer by using a laser ablation
357
repetition rate of 6 Hz lasting 50 s with a spot size of 44 µm in NIST SRM 610.
358
Different symbol colors mean different test times.
359
Figure 5. Signal profiles of
360
laser ablation without (a) and with (b) the “wave” signal smoothing device. Signals
361
were acquired using a repetition rate of 6 Hz and a spot size of 44 µm in sulfide
362
standard MASS-1.
363
Figure 6. The relative deviation of the determined
364
standards, sulfide standard MASS-1 and natural sphalerite ZnS-1 from reference
365
values both with and without the “wave” signal smoothing and mercury removing
202
Hg,
204
Hg+204Pb and
206
208
Pb produced by continuous
Pb/204Pb isotope ratios in glass
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 20 of 26
366
device. Each data point represents one single spot analysis with a spot size of 90 µm.
367
Error bars represent the within-run precision (2σ) for single spot analysis. For glass
368
standards analysis, the
369
counters. For the sulfide standard MASS-1 and natural sphalerite ZnS-1,
370
204
371
from the GeoReM database (http://georem.mpch-mainz.gwdg.de/).
202
Hg and
204
Hg +
204
Pb signals are detected by using ion 202
Hg and
Hg+204Pb were measured using Faraday cups. The reference values used are taken
372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
380
381 382 383
Figure 1
384
21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
400000
without stabilizer
Signal intensity / CPS
(a)
with "wave" stabilizer
300000
200000
100000 Position A 0 0
20
385 386
40 60 Time / s
400000
80
100
without stabilizer
(b) Signal intensity / CPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 22 of 26
with "wave" stabilizer
300000
200000
100000 Position B 0 0
387 388 389 390
20
40 60 Time / s
80
Figure 2
391 392 393 394 395 396 397
22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
100
Page 23 of 26
1000000
(a) Signal intensity / CPS
100000
without stabiliz er with "wave" stabilizer
10000 1000 100 10 65
70
75
398
80 Time / s
85
90
95
1000000
(b) 100000 Signal intensity / CPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
without stabiliz er with "wave" stabilizer
10000 1000 100 10 65
399 400 401 402
70
75
80 Time / s
85
90
Figure 3
23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
95
Analytical Chemistry
403 1.20 1.10 Normalized signal
1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 Li Be B Na Mg Al Si P K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Rh Ag Cd In Sn Sb Te Cs Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Hf Ta W Pt Au Pb Tl Pb Bi Th U
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
404 405
Figure 4
406 407
24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 26
Page 25 of 26
408 10
(a)
Signal intensity / V
1 0.1 0.01
202Hg 204Pb 208Pb
0.001 0.0001 0
20
40 60 Time /s
80
100
20
40 60 Time /s
80
100
409 10
(b)
1 Signal intensity / V
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Analytical Chemistry
0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0
410 411 412 413 414 415
Figure 5
25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Analytical Chemistry
416 4 3
Accuracy (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 26 of 26
2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4
417 418 419
w i th “wave” signal smoothing and mercury removing device w i thout “wave” signal smoothing and mercury removing device
206Pb/ 204Pb
M L 3 BB- G
B H V OO- 2G
( 1 . 38 ppm) ( 1 . 70 ppm)
N IS T61 4
A H T OO-G
( 2 . 32 ppm) ( 5 . 67 ppm)
S t Hs6/80
T 1-G
M A S SS- 1
Z n S -1
( 1 0 .3 ppm)
( 1 1 .6 ppm)
( 6 7 ppm)
( 8 8 - 410 ppm)
Figure 6
26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment