Step-Economic Synthesis of (+)-Crocacin C: A Concise

The step-economic total synthesis of (+)-crocacin C has been achieved in 20% yield from commercially available starting materials. This approach requi...
1 downloads 0 Views 659KB Size
Download PDF
Article pubs.acs.org/joc

Step-Economic Synthesis of (+)-Crocacin C: A Concise Crotylboronation/[3,3]-Sigmatropic Rearrangement Approach† Adele E. Pasqua,‡ Frank D. Ferrari,‡ Chris Hamman,§ Yanzhou Liu,§ James J. Crawford,§ and Rodolfo Marquez*,‡,∥ ‡

School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K. Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California 94080, United States

§

S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: The step-economic total synthesis of (+)-crocacin C has been achieved in 20% yield from commercially available starting materials. This approach requires the isolation of only 8 intermediates and can provide a reliable supply of (+)-crocacin C for the development of new antifungal and crop protection agents.

T

residue. Crocacin C 3 is the free carboxamide unit. The promising biological activity, together with their low natural abundance and interesting structural features, has made them attractive synthetic targets. This interest has resulted in a number of formal and total syntheses.4−11 As part of our efforts toward the development of stable crocacin analogues starting from (+)-crocacin C as a synthetic platform, we have recently reported our initial modular synthetic approach to the formal synthesis of (+)-crocacin C 3.11 However, despite the fact that our approach was successful in completing the formal synthesis of (+)-crocacin C 3, it was deemed unsuitable for scale-up due to the number of steps required and its low overall efficiency. Challenged by this outcome, we sought to develop an alternative route, and in this contribution we report our efficient, step-economic, and costeffective second generation synthesis of (+)-crocacin C 3 from commercially available starting materials.

he crocacins are a family of four antifungal and cytotoxic antibiotics, isolated in 1994 from two different strains of Chondromyces bacteria by Höfle and co-workers (Figure 1).1

Figure 1. Crocacins A−D.

■

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In planning our current approach, we envisioned that crocacin C 3 could be derived following a route featuring a concise crotylboronation, cross-metathesis, and [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement (Scheme 1).

Biologically, the crocacins exhibit a range of activities. Crocacin A 1 has shown remarkable activity as a growth inhibitor of fungi and yeasts through inhibition of the electron flow within the cytochrome bc1 segment (complex III) of the respiratory chain, while crocacin D 4 has shown a MIC of 1.4 ng/mL against S. cerevisiae.2 Crucial for this bioactivity is the highly reactive enamide moiety. It has been postulated that the enamide unit is protonated, and the resultant N-acyliminium ion can then be trapped by a nucleophile to generate the enzyme complex responsible for activity.2 Despite their relative instability, the crocacins have been the subject of industrial antifungal research as they inhibit strains of yeast that have been genetically modified for antifungal resistance,3 as well as vine downy mildew (Phytophthora infestans) and wheat brown rust (Puccinia recondite). Crocacins A 1, B 2, and D 4 are unusual dipeptides incorporating glycine and a 6-aminohexenoic or 6-aminohexadienoic acid in which the nitrogen is protected by a complex polyketide derived acyl © 2012 American Chemical Society

Scheme 1. Second Generation Retrosynthetic Analysis of (+)-Crocacin C 3

Received: June 11, 2012 Published: July 17, 2012 6989

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo301210f | J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6989−6997

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Enone 13

Table 1. Cross-Metathesis Studies for the Synthesis of Enone 13a

a

entry

equiv 10

equiv 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 10.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

1.5 1.5 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

X H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, O O O O

OAc OAc OAc OAc OH OH OAc OAc

conditions

13 (%)

HGII, 0.1 MDCM, 40 °C, 12 h GII, 0.1 MDCM, 40 °C, 12 h GII, 0.1 MDCM, 45 °C, 24 h HGII, 0.05 M DCM, 80 °C, MW, 12 h GII, 0.05 M DCM, 80 °C, MW, 12 h HGII, 0.1 MDCM, 80 °C, 2 h GII, 0.1 MDCM, 45 °C, 72 h GII, 0.1 M toluene, 45 °C, 72 h HGII, 0.2 M DCM, 50 °C, 120 h HGII, 0.25 M DCM, 40 °C,, MW, 48 h HGII, 0.3 MDCM, 40 °C, 48 h Zhan 1B, 0.3 M DCM, 40 °C, 48 h

only poor homodimerization only poor homodimerization only poor homodimerization no rxn, SM epimerized decomposition decomposition decomposition/epimerization decomposition/epimerization 21 43 40 65

GII = Grubbs second generation; HGII = second generation Hoveyda−Grubbs.

Subsequent Corey−Bakshi−Shibata reduction of enone 13 afforded the desired allylic alcohol 14 in excellent yield and in >99% d.e.14 Interestingly, we observed a long-range influence exerted by the homoallylic alcohol on the outcome of this reduction (Table 2). For example, when the alcohol was acetylated, the epimeric alcohol 14a was observed as the major diastereomer in poor yield. However, when the allylic alcohol was methylated, the yield was improved significantly, but no stereocontrol was observed during the reduction. In the case of

Our synthesis of (+)-crocacin C 3 began with the commercially available Roche ester 5 (Scheme 2). Silyl protection and reduction−oxidation of the resultant methyl ester 6 gave aldehyde 8 (Scheme 2). Diastereoselective crotylboronation of aldehyde 8 under Roush’s conditions yielded the desired anti,anti-adduct 10.12 It is worth noting that alcohol 10 is the first intermediate in the synthesis that required purification. The pivotal crotylboronation allowed the insertion of two stereocenters to generate the required anti,anti stereotriad in a single transformation and provided us with an olefinic handle from which a cross-metathesis could be explored. Despite extensive experimentation, the cross-metathesis of olefin 10 with either vinyl acetophenone 11 or its reduced form proved extremely difficult, most likely due to the low reactivity of both coupling partners (Table 1). However, application of the cross-metathesis methodology recently reported by Donohoe13 using the Zhan 1B catalyst 12 successfully coupled the two olefins in good yield and with excellent stereocontrol to give the desired E-enone 13.

Table 2. Long-Range Neighboring Group Effects Observed during CBS Reductions

6990

entry

R

T (°C)

1 2 3

Ac 13a Me 13b H 13

−40 −10 −40

isolated yield (%) 40 99 93

14a 14b 14

(R)/(S) 1.0/2.0 1.1/1.0 >99.0/1.0

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo301210f | J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6989−6997

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Scheme 3. Synthesis of Alcohol 19

the unprotected alcohol 13, the reduction proceeded with complete stereocontrol to generate the desired diol 14. Although the reasons for this remarkable change in behavior are not completely clear, it is possible that coordination between the free alcohol and the oxazaborolidine is responsible for the enhancement in stereoselectivity observed. The newly generated diol 14 was acetylated to generate the bis-acetate 15, allowing us to implement the key [3,3]sigmatropic rearrangement. Gratifyingly, when treated with PdCl2(CH3CN)2, bis-acetate 15 gave the desired anti,anti,synproduct 16 as a single diastereomer in excellent yield (Scheme 3).15 Hydrolysis of the bis-acetate 16 afforded the free diol 17 together with triol 18, which could be recycled to afford diol 17 in very good overall yield. Methylation of diol 17 followed by silyl-group removal provided the desired alcohol 19 in near quantitative yield over the two steps. With alcohol 19 in hand, the final steps of the synthesis were explored. Careful oxidation of alcohol 19 produced aldehyde 20, which upon Horner−Wadsworth−Emmons olefination gave the expected dienoate ester 22 as a single diastereomer (Scheme 4).5a Unfortunately, all attempts to hydrolyze ester 22 resulted in degradation.

Scheme 5. Preliminary Stille Coupling

coupling afforded (+)-crocacin C 3 in poor yield, an exciting mixture of products containing two novel isomeric crocacin analogues 25 and 26 was also obtained. The promising Stille coupling results prompted us to consider a reverse coupling strategy for the completion of the synthesis whereby the enamide unit is introduced as the vinyl halide and the C4−C11 framework of (+)-crocacin C 3 is brought forward as the vinyl stannane.4a Hodgson olefination of aldehyde 20 provided us with the key E-vinyl stannane unit 27 in moderate yield (Scheme 6).17,4a Microwave-assisted Stille coupling of vinyl stannane 27 with the vinyl iodide bearing amide 28 yielded (+)-crocacin C 3 as a single double bond isomer in much improved yield. Although the Stille coupling of vinyl stannane 27 with vinyl iodide 28 yielded (+)-crocacin C 3 as a single alkene isomer, the process was not amenable to scale-up, often resulting in protodestannylation during purification of vinyl stannane 27. In a variant of the highly promising Stille coupling, which would allow us to circumvent the protodestannylation issues, aldehyde 20 was subjected to Ohira−Bestmann homologation conditions to generate alkyne 30 in quantitative yield (Scheme 7).18 To our delight, in situ conversion of alkyne 30 into the Evinyl stannane with concomitant Stille coupling (with vinyl

Scheme 4. Horner−Wadsworth−Emmons Approach

As a consequence of this initial setback, an alternative end game was required for the synthesis of (+)-crocacin C 3. In order to introduce the amide functionality without necessitating a final functional group interconversion, a strategy involving a metal-mediated coupling with the amide unit already in place was pursued.6a Treatment of aldehyde 20 under Takai conditions afforded the desired E-iodo-alkene 23 in excellent yield and with complete stereocontrol (Scheme 5).16 With the E-iodo-alkene 23 in hand, a Stille coupling with the known stannyl enamide 246a was then performed. Although the 6991

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo301210f | J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6989−6997

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Scheme 6. Reverse Stille Coupling Strategy

Scheme 7. End-Game Strategy to (+)-Crocacin C 3

iodide 28) using Bressy and Pons’ conditions9 afforded (+)-crocacin C 3 in high yield and as a single isomer.

were used. The plates were visualized by the quenching of UV fluorescence (λmax 254 nm) and/or by staining with potassium permanganate or p-anisaldehyde followed by heating. (S)-Methyl 3-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-2-methylpropanoate, 6. To a 0 °C solution of (S)-methyl 3-hydroxy-2methylpropanoate 5 (7.0 g, 59.3 mmol) and imidazole (4.8 g, 71.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (300 mL) was added TBDPSCl (17.0 mL, 65.2 mmol) in small portions, and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stir until completion as indicated by TLC analysis (12 h). The reaction was then quenched with satd aq NaHCO3 (200 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 150 mL). The organic layers were collected, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under vacuum to afford 21.15 g of the desired ester 6 as colorless oil (quant) which required no further purification. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.70−7.65 (m, 4H), 7.45−7.37 (m, 6H), 3.86 (1H, dd, J = 9.8, 6.9 Hz), 3.76 (1H, dd, J = 9.8, 5.9 Hz), 3.71 (3H, s), 2.79−2.68 (1H, m), 1.18 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.06 (9H, s). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 175.5, 135.7, 133.6, 129.8, 127.8, 66.0, 51.7, 42.5, 26.8, 19.4, 13.6. Rf 0.44 (hexane/EtOAc, 9:1); [α]22D +6.8 (c 1.0, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 3073−2859, 1740, 1472, 1427, 1389, 1362, 1258, 1198, 1177, 1106, 824, 739, 702 cm−1. HRMS (CI+/ISO) calcd for C21H29O3Si [M + H]+: 357.1886, found 357.1888. (R)-3-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-2-methylpropan-1-ol, 7. A 0 °C solution of ester 6 (22.0 g, 61.7 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (300 mL) was treated with the dropwise addition of DIBAL-H (1 M in CH2Cl2, 135.7 mL, 135.7 mmol), and the resulting reaction mixture was allowed to stir at 0 °C until completion by TLC analysis (3 h). The reaction mixture was quenched at 0 °C by the careful addition of satd aq Rochelle’s salt (250 mL), and the biphasic system was allowed to stir at room temperature for 12 h. The phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 150 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine (300 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under vacuum to afford 20.1 g of alcohol 7 as colorless oil (99% yield) The crude product was clean enough and could be used without the need of any further purification. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.71−7.66 (m, 4H), 7.47−7.37 (m, 6H), 3.74 (1H, dd, J = 9.9, 4.5 Hz), 3.68 (2H, m), 3.61 (1H, dd, J = 10.1, 7.7 Hz), 2.56 (1H, bs), 2.06−1.95 (1H, m), 1.07 (9H, s), 0.84 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 135.7, 134.9, 133.3, 129.9, 127.9, 68.9, 67.8, 37.4, 26.9, 19.3, 13.3. Rf 0.29 (hexane/EtOAc, 9:1), [α]25D +4.0 (c 1.0, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 3387, 3073−2859, 1472, 1427, 1391, 1362, 1111, 1086, 1028, 939, 822, 802, 739, 698 cm−1. HRMS (CI+/ISO) calcd for C20H29O2Si [M + H]+: 329.1937, found 329.1933.

■

CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, we have developed a reliable, flexible, and highly efficient synthesis of (+)-crocacin C 3 from commercially available starting materials that compares favorably with previous syntheses. Our approach is amenable to scale-up and is able to generate (+)-crocacin C 3 in 14 steps (8 isolated intermediates) and 20% overall yield from commercially available Roche ester 5. Efforts are currently underway to develop new antifungal agents based on the frameworks of (+)-crocacin C and the structurally isomeric analogues 25 and 26.

■

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

General. All reactions were performed in oven-dried glassware under an inert argon atmosphere unless otherwise stated. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and toluene were purified through a solvent purification system. Anhydrous 1,3-dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro2(1H)-pyrimidinone (DMPU), dimethylformamide (DMF), and methanol (MeOH) were obtained commercially. Dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) was freshly distilled over CaH2. All reagents were used as received, unless otherwise stated. Solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure at 40 °C unless otherwise stated. IR spectra were recorded as neat films using a Fourier Transform spectrometer. Only significant absorptions (νmax) are reported in wavenumbers (cm−1). Proton magnetic resonance spectra (1H NMR) and carbon magnetic resonance spectra (13C NMR) were recorded at, respectively, 400/500 MHz and 100/125 MHz. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) and are referenced to the residual solvent peak. The order of citation in parentheses is (1) number of equivalent nuclei (by integration), (2) multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, quint = quintet, sext = sextet, sept = septet, m = multiplet, b = broad), (3) and coupling constant (J) quoted in Hertz to the nearest 0.1 Hz. High resolution mass spectra were recorded by electrospray (ESI), fast atom bombardment (FAB), electron impact (EI), or chemical ionization (CI) using a mass spectrometer operating at a resolution of 15,000 full widths at half height. Flash chromatography was performed using silica gel (40−63 μm) as the stationary phase. TLC was performed on aluminum sheets precoated with silica (silica gel 60 F254) unless otherwise stated where aluminum oxide plates 6992

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo301210f | J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6989−6997

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

cm−1. HRMS (EI+) calcd for C9H10O [M]+: 134.0732, found 134.0733. 1-Phenylprop-2-en-1-one, 12. A solution of 1-phenylprop-2-en1-ol (6.23 g, 47.1 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (500 mL) was treated with TEMPO (147 mg, 0.94 mmol) and iodobenzene diacetate (38.0 g, 118 mmol) at room temperature. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion as indicated by TLC analysis (12 h). The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of satd aq Na2S2O3 (200 mL) and left to stir for 1 h. The organic phase was separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O (3 × 200 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum to afford an orange-yellow residue. Purification of the crude product by flash column chromatography (silica gel, 80:20 hexane/Et2O) gave 5.3 g (85%) of enone 12 as yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.97−7.93 (2H, m), 7.60− 7.56 (1H, m), 7.49−7.47 (2H, m), 7.16 (1H, dd, J = 17.1, 10.6 Hz), 6.45 (1H, dd, J = 17.1, 1.7 Hz), 5.94 (1H, dd, J = 10.6, 1.7 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 191.2, 137.5, 133.1, 132.6, 130.3, 128.8, 128.7. Rf 0.37 (hexane/Et2O, 8:2); IR νmax (film) 2967, 2932, 2874, 1768, 1668, 1618, 1449, 1364, 1252, 1215, 1090, 1015, 916, 775, 735 cm−1. HRMS (CI+/ISO) calcd for C9H9O [M + H]+: 133.0653, found 133.0650. (4R,5R,6S,E)-7-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-5-hydroxy-4,6-dimethyl-1-phenylhept-2-en-1-one, 13. A 0.5 − 2 mL microwave vial, fitted with a magnetic follower, was charged with Zhan 1B catalyst (15 mg, 5 mol %). The vial was sealed with a rubber septum and purged with argon. A solution of alcohol 10 (145 mg, 0.38 mmol) and 1-phenylprop-2-en-1-one 12 (250 mg, 1.89 mmol) in freeze−thaw degassed CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added, and the resulting green solution was heated at 40 °C for 12 h. After this period, a further portion of Zhan 1B catalyst (15 mg, 5 mol %) in 1.5 mL of freeze−thaw degassed CH2Cl2 was added, and the resulting brown solution was subjected to an additional heating cycle at 40 °C for 12 h. The reaction mixture was then allowed to cool to room temperature and concentrated under vacuum to afford a dark brown crude oil. Purification of the crude residue by flash column chromatography (silica gel, 80:20 hexane/ EtOAc) afforded 120 mg (65%) of enone 13 as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95−7.91 (2H, m), 7.69−7.65 (4H, m), 7.49−7.36 (9H, m), 7.20 (1H, dd, J = 15.8, 8.6 Hz), 6.86 (1H, d, J = 15.7 Hz), 3.96 (1H, d, J = 2.7 Hz), 3.74 (1H, dd, J = 10.4. 4.0 Hz), 3.68−3.64 (1H, m), 3.61−3.58 (1H, m), 2.69−2.61 (1H, m), 1.88− 1.80 (1H, m), 1.23 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.05 (9H, s), 0.80 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 191.5, 151.2, 138.2, 135.8, 135.7, 132.7, 130.1, 130.0, 128.8, 128.6, 128.0, 127.9, 126.9, 80.2, 69.6, 40.7, 38.0, 26.9, 19.2, 17.4, 13.6. Rf 0.29 (hexane/EtOAc, 8:2); [α]25D +188.6 (c 0.1, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 3450, 2974, 2931, 2857, 1670, 1618, 1473, 1428, 1112, 998, 823, 741, 700 cm−1. HRMS (EI+) calcd for C31H37O2Si [M − OH]+: 469.2563, found 469.2557. (1R,4R,5R,6S,E)-7-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-4,6-dimethyl1-phenylhept-2-ene-1,5-diol, 14. A room temperature solution of (S)-CBS (348 mg, 1.25 mmol) dry THF (15 mL) was treated with the dropwise addition of BH3·THF (1 M solution in THF, 1.25 mL, 1.25 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred vigorously at room temperature for 30 min and then cooled to −40 °C before being treated dropwise with a solution of (4R,5R,6S,E)-7-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-5-hydroxy-4,6-dimethyl-1-phenylhept-2-en-1-one 13 (500 mg, 1.03 mmol) in dry THF (15 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at −40 °C until complete disappearance of the starting material by TLC (5 h). The reaction was quenched with MeOH (10 mL) and concentrated under vacuum to afford a yellow crude oil. Purification of the crude residue by flash column chromatography (silica gel, 60:40 hexane/EtOAc) yielded 467 mg (93%) of diol 14 as clear yellow oil. 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.69−7.65 (4H, m), 7.46−7.43 (2H, m), 7.42−7.37 (6H, m), 7.36−7.32 (2H, m), 7.29−7.25 (1H, m), 5.93 (1H, ddd, J = 15.6, 8.5, 0.9 Hz), 5.69 (1H, ddd, J = 15.6, 7.1, 0.7 Hz), 5.22 (1H, dd, J = 6.9, 3.4 Hz), 3.72−3.64 (3H, m), 3.46−3.43 (1H, m), 2.40−2.36 (1H, m), 2.03 (1H, d, J = 3.6 Hz), 1.81−1.75 (1H, m), 1.13 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.06 (9H, s), 0.74 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 143.5, 135.7, 133.6, 133.3, 132.9, 130.1, 130.0, 128.6, 128.0, 127.9, 127.6, 126.2, 80.2, 75.3, 69.2, 39.8, 37.9,

(S)-3-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-2-methylpropanal, 8. A solution of oxalyl chloride (2.15 mL, 24.5 mmol) in freshly distilled CH2Cl2 (195 mL) was cooled to −78 °C and treated dropwise with a solution of dimethylsulfoxide (3.5 mL, 49.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (8 mL), and the resulting mixture was stirred under argon at −78 °C for 30 min. A solution of (R)-3-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-2-methylpropan1-ol 7 (4.02 g, 12.25 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (8 mL) was added dropwise, and the reaction was allowed to stir at −78 °C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was quenched at −78 °C by the addition dropwise of triethylamine (13.7 mL, 98.0 mmol), and the obtained solution was stirred at −78 °C for 10 min and then at room temperature for a further 30 min. The reaction mixture was washed with satd aq NaHCO3 (100 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 100 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (100 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under vacuum to afford 4.02 g of aldehyde 8 as a yellow oil in quantitative yield (4.02 g, 12.3 mmol). The crude product was taken straight onto the next step without any further purification. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.77 (1H, d, J = 1.7 Hz), 7.68−7.62 (4H, m), 7.45−7.38 (6H, m), 3.95−3.82 (2H, m), 2.65−2.50 (1H, m), 1.10 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 1.05 (9H, s). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 204.6, 135.7, 129.9, 127.9, 64.2, 48.9, 26.9, 19.3, 10.4. Rf 0.38 (hexane/Et2O, 9:1); [α]26D +5.0 (c 2.0, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 3073−2720, 2114, 1738−1713, 1472, 1428, 1111, 1026, 1008, 808, 826, 739, 698, 689, 615 cm−1. HRMS (CI+/ISO) calcd for C20H27O2Si [M + H]+: 327.1780, found 327.1774. (2S,3R,4R)-1-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-2,4-dimethylhex-5en-3-ol, 10. A slurry of 300 mg of 4 Å powdered molecular sieves (previously dried under vacuum using a heatgun) in dry toluene (15 mL) was treated with (4S,5S)-diisopropyl 2-((E)-but-2-enyl)-1,3,2dioxaborolane-4,5-dicarboxylate, 912b (13.8 mL, 13.8 mmol, 1.0 M solution in dry toluene). The heterogeneous solution was stirred at room temperature for 10 min and was then cooled to −78 °C. A solution of (S)-3-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-2-methylpropanal 8 (3.0 g, 9.2 mmol) in dry toluene (15 mL) was then added dropwise to the mixture via a cannula over a 20 min period. Once the addition was complete, the solution was maintained at −78 °C for 16 h. Excess ethanolic NaBH4 (200 mg in 3 mL of absolute EtOH) was then introduced dropwise via a pipet, and the resulting solution was allowed to warm to 0 °C. The reaction mixture was then diluted with 1 N NaOH (25 mL) and stirred vigorously for 2 h. The phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with diethyl ether (5 × 150 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over K2CO3 and concentrated under vacuum to afford yellow oil as crude product. Purification of the crude residue (90:10 hexane/Et2O) yielded 2.3 g (65%) of alkene 10 as colorless oil.1 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.59−7.56 (4H, m), 7.36−7.24 (6H, m), 5.86 (1H, ddd, J = 10.5, 8.4, 2.1 Hz), 5.00−4.94 (2H, m), 3.66−3.58 (2H, m), 3.39 (1H, dd, J = 3.3, 0.6 Hz), 3.36−3.32 (1H, m), 2.33−2.22 (1H, m), 1.77−1.70 (1H, m), 1.02 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.97 (9H, s), 0.72 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz). 13 C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 139.9, 135.7, 132.9, 129.9, 127.8, 79.7, 68.9, 41.2, 37.9, 26.9, 19.1, 17.8, 13.6. Rf 0.32 (hexane/Et2O, 9:1); [α]28D +14.6 (c 4.0, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 3050, 2062, 1430, 1210, 1010, 915, 864, 702, 610, 420, 350 cm−1. HRMS (CI+/ISO) calcd for C24H35O2Si [M + H]+: 383.2406, found 383.2410. 1-Phenylprop-2-en-1-ol. Vinylmagnesium bromide (1.0 M in THF, 47.1 mL, 47.1 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of benzaldehyde (5.0 g, 47.1 mmol) in dry THF (250 mL) at 0 °C. After stirring for 10 min the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and was stirred for 4 h. The reaction was then quenched by addition of satd aq NH4Cl (200 mL) and extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 150 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (200 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under vacuum to afford 6.23 g (quant) of 1-phenylprop-2-en-1-ol as crude yellow oil, which was taken directly onto the next step without any further purification. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.38−7.36 (5H, m), 6.05 (1H, ddd, J = 17.1, 10.3, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 5.38−5.33 (1H, m), 5.22−5.17 (1H, m), 4.66 (1H, bs). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 142.7, 140.3, 128.7, 128.6, 127.8, 126.4, 115.2, 75.4. Rf 0.21 (hexane/Et2O, 8:2); IR νmax (film) 3371, 1667, 1451, 1119, 950, 865, 780, 706, 630, 410, 360 6993

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo301210f | J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6989−6997

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL) and concentrated under vacuum to afford 100 mg (60%) of the desired silyl ether 17 as colorless oil. The total yield for the silyl ether over the two steps was 133 mg (80%). (3S,4R,5S,6S,E)-7-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-4,6-dimethyl1-phenylhept-1-ene-3,5-diol, 17. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.70−7.67 (4H, m), 7.49−7.40 (8H, m), 7.34−7.19 (3H, m), 6.66 (1H, dd, J = 15.9, 1.2 Hz), 6.26 (1H, dd, J = 15.9, 5.4 Hz), 4.78 (1H, d, J = 2.8 Hz), 4.73−4.68 (1H, m), 4.28 (1H, d, J = 2.8 Hz), 3.87 (1H, dd, J = 10.3, 3.7 Hz), 3.75−3.70 (1H, m), 3.67 (1H, dd, J = 10.3, 7.6 Hz), 2.14−2.04 (1H, m), 1.99−1.89 (1H, m), 1.07 (9H, s), 1.04 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), 0.86 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 137.4, 135.8, 135.7, 132.6, 132.5, 131.2, 130.2, 130.1, 129.9, 128.6, 128.1, 128.0, 127.4, 126.6, 82.2, 73.0, 69.5, 39.9, 36.9, 26.9, 19.2, 13.9, 11.9. Rf 0.60 (hexane/EtOAc, 7:3); [α]27D +3.6 (c 1.0, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 3418, 3072, 2963, 2932, 2855, 1427, 1111 cm−1. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C31H37OSi [M − 2OH]+: 453.2608, found 453.2609. Triol 18 matched the literature data: Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 395−3954. tert-Butyl((2S,3S,4R,5S,E)-3,5-dimethoxy-2,4-dimethyl-7phenylhept-6-enyloxy)diphenylsilane. A suspension of NaH (85 mg, 2.13 mmol) in dry THF (2 mL) was treated with a solution of diol 17 (130 mg, 266 μmol) in dry THF (2 mL), and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. The solution was then treated sequentially with MeI (0.3 mL, 4.26 mmol) and TBAI (8 mg, 21.3 μmol), and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C until TLC analysis indicated reaction completion (12 h). The reaction was quenched with satd aq solution of NH4Cl (5 mL), and the layers were separated. The organic layer was washed with brine (5 mL), and the aqueous layer was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under vacuum to afford the fully protected triol as pale yellow oil, which could be used without any further purification. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.71−7.66 (4H, m), 7.45−7.23 (11H, m), 6.54 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 6.14 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 7.2 Hz), 4.03 (1H, dd, J = 7.2, 2.0 Hz), 3.77 (1H, dd, J = 10.0, 5.3 Hz), 3.58 (1H, dd, J = 9.9, 7.9 Hz), 3.47 (3H, s), 3.33 (3H, s), 3.23−3.19 (1H, m), 2.09− 1.99 (1H, m), 1.81−1.71 (1H, m), 1.15 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.05 (9H, s), 0.83 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 137.1, 135.8, 135.7, 134.2, 134.1, 131.9, 131.8, 129.8, 129.7, 129.6, 128.7, 127.7, 127.6, 126.5, 85.6, 81.5, 64.9, 61.5, 56.6, 41.8, 38.1, 27.0, 19.4, 16.0, 10.5. (2S,3S,4R,5S,E)-3,5-Dimethoxy-2,4-dimethyl-7-phenylhept6-en-1-ol, 19. A 0 °C solution of tert-butyl((2S,3S,4R,5S,E)-3,5dimethoxy-2,4-dimethyl-7-phenylhept-6-enyloxy)diphenylsilane (138 mg, 0.266 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was treated with TBAF (1 M in THF, 0.8 mL, 0.798 mmol), and the resulting reaction mixture was allowed to warm and stir at room temperature until completion as indicated by TLC analysis (12 h). The reaction was quenched with distilled water (5 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine (10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under vacuum to afford a crude pale yellow oil. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel, 60:40 hexane/EtOAc) to afford 73 mg of alcohol 19 (99%) as colorless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.43−7.39 (2H, m), 7.36−7.31 (2H, m), 7.27−7.23 (1H, m), 6.58 (1H, d, J = 16.3 Hz), 6.19 (1H, dd, J = 15.8, 7.1 Hz), 4.08−4.05 (1H, m), 3.89−3.82 (1H, m), 3.57−3.51 (1H, m), 3.53 (3H, s), 3.32 (3H, s), 3.29 (1H, dd, J = 9.4, 2.7 Hz), 2.92−2.87 (1H, m), 1.92−1.82 (2H, m), 1.21 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), 0.91 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 136.9, 132.3, 129.5, 128.8, 127.8, 126.6, 88.6, 81.3, 64.7, 61.8, 56.5, 42.5, 35.9, 16.4, 10.5. Rf 0.14 (hexane/EtOAc, 8:2); [α]22D −5.2 (c 1.0, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 3440, 2972, 2935, 2831, 1497, 1449, 1100 cm−1. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C17H26O3Na [M + Na]+: 301.1774, found 301.1772. (2R,3R,4R,5S,E)-3,5-Dimethoxy-2,4-dimethyl-7-phenylhept6-enal, 20. A solution of (2S,3S,4R,5S,E)-3,5-dimethoxy-2,4-dimethyl-7-phenylhept-6-en-1-ol 19 (30 mg, 0.11 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (2 mL) was treated with Dess−Martin periodinane (92 mg, 0.22 mmol), and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion as indicated by TLC analysis (40 min). The reaction was

26.9, 19.2, 18.1, 13.6. Rf 0.19 (hexane/EtOAc, 8:2); [α]25D −4.8 (c 0.1, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 2974, 2931, 2859, 1473, 1428, 1383, 1112, 986, 823, 741, 699 cm−1. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C31H41O2Si [M − OH]+: 473.2870, found 473.2868. (1R,4R,5R,6S,E)-7-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-4,6-dimethyl1-phenylhept-2-ene-1,5-diyl diacetate, 15. A solution of diol 14 (500 mg, 0.87 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (50 mL) was treated with acetic anhydride (1.0 mL, 10.47 mmol) followed by DMAP (11 mg, 0.09 mmol), and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion as indicated by TLC analysis (12 h). The solvent was then removed under vacuum to afford a yellow-brown crude product. Purification of the crude residue by flash column chromatography (silica gel, 80:20 hexane/EtOAc) yielded 495 mg (99%) of diacetate 15 as colorless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.66−7.61 (4H, m), 7.45−7.27 (11H, m), 6.18 (1H, bd, J = 4.6 Hz), 5.59 (2H, bd, J = 6.8 Hz), 4.76 (1H, t, J = 6.2 Hz), 3.61 (1H, dd, J = 10.0, 4.5 Hz), 3.46−3.39 (1H, m), 2.59−2.46 (1H, m), 2.08 (3H, s), 1.99−1.89 (1H, m), 1.73 (3H, s), 1.04 (9H, s), 0.95 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.91 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.7, 139.8, 135.8, 135.4, 133.8, 133.7, 129.7, 129.4, 128.7, 128.1, 127.8, 127.7, 127.6, 126.9, 77.9, 76.2, 64.9, 39.0, 37.2, 26.9, 21.5, 20.7, 19.3, 17.5, 14.5. Rf 0.46 (hexane/EtOAc, 8:2); [α]25D −8.4 (c 0.1, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 2974, 2963, 2928, 2857, 2360, 2343, 1739, 1472, 1428, 1370, 1233, 1112, 10018, 964, 824, 756, 699 cm−1. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C31H37OSi [M − 2OAc]+: 453.2608, found 453.2606. (3S,4R,5S,6S,E)-7-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-4,6-dimethyl1-phenylhept-1-ene-3,5-diyl diacetate, 16. A solution of diacetate 15 (420 mg, 0.73 mmol) in anhydrous THF (30 mL) was treated with PdCl2(CH3CN)2 (10 mg, 0.03 mmol, 5 mol %), and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature until reaction completion as indicated by TLC analysis (12 h). The solution was filtered through Celite, and the Celite was washed using EtOAc (50 mL) as the eluent. The EtOAc washings were then concentrated under vacuum to afford a yellow-brown crude oil, which upon purification by flash column chromatography (silica gel, 80:20 hexane/ EtOAc) afforded 399 mg (95%) of the desired 1,3-diacetate 16 a yellow oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.70−7.65 (4H, m), 7.42− 7.37 (6H, m), 7.35−7.21 (5H, m), 6.46 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 1.0 Hz), 6.06 (1H, dd, J = 15.9, 5.8 Hz), 5.53−5.49 (1H, m), 4.94 (1H, dd, J = 9.7, 3.2 Hz), 3.76 (1H, dd, J = 10.2, 6.1 Hz), 3.47 (1H, dd, J = 10.3, 6.8 Hz), 2.32−2.25 (1H, m), 2.21−2.13 (1H, m), 2.08 (3H, s), 1.99 (3H, s), 1.04 (9H, s), 0.96 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 0.94 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.8, 170.6, 136.6, 135.6, 133.8, 133.7, 131.8, 129.8, 129.7, 128.7, 127.9, 127.8, 126.9, 126.6, 76.3, 73.0, 64.7, 38.9, 36.8, 26.9, 21.3, 20.9, 19.3, 15.3, 11.1. Rf 0.54 (hexane/EtOAc, 8:2); [α]25D −7.6 (c 0.1, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 3071, 2961, 2932, 2857, 1739, 1237, 1112 cm−1. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C35H44O5NaSi [M + Na]+: 595.2850, found 595.2852. (3S,4R,5S,6S,E)-7-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-4,6-dimethyl1-phenylhept-1-ene-3,5-diol, 17 and (2S,3S,4R,5S,E)-2,4-Dimethyl-7-phenylhept-6-ene-1,3,5-triol, 18. A solution of diacetate 16 (195 mg, 0.34 mmol) in MeOH (10 mL) was treated dropwise with a 1.0 M K2CO3 solution in H2O (1.7 mL), and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature until completion of reaction as indicated by TLC analysis (12 h). The reaction was quenched with satd aq NH4Cl solution (10 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum to afford crude pale yellow oil. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel, elution gradient 80:20 hexane/EtOAc, then 60/40 hexane/EtOAc) to yield 33 mg (20%) of the desired diol 17 as a colorless oil as well as 51 mg of the known triol 18 as a pale yellow oil. Triol 18 (51 mg, 0.21 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (1 mL) and treated with imidazole (18 mg, 0.27 mmol), and the resulting mixture was cooled to −5 °C. A solution of TBDPSCl (62 mg, 0.23 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was then added dropwise to the reaction mixture, and the resulting solution was allowed to stir at −5 °C until complete disappearance of the starting material by TLC analysis (30 min). The reaction was quenched with H2O (5 mL) and 6994

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo301210f | J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6989−6997

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

temperature, before being cooled back down to 0 °C. A solution of (E)-ethyl 3-(tributylstannyl)but-2-enoate (343 mg, 0.86 mmol) in dry toluene (5 mL) was then added, and the resulting reaction mixture was warmed and heated at 50 °C for 16 h. The reaction was then allowed to cool and was then diluted with EtOAc (10 mL) and quenched at 0 °C by addition of 10% HCl in a saturated NaCl aqueous solution (20 mL total volume). The organic phase was washed with satd aq NaHCO3 (20 mL) and brine (20 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under vacuum to afford a thick pale yellow oil. Purification of the crude product by flash column chromatography (silica gel, hexane/EtOAc, 20/80) gave 124 mg (78%) of amide 24 as a pure white solid. Mp: 33 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.92 (1H, q, J = 1.7 Hz), 5.64 (1H, bs), 5.39 (1H, bs), 2.35 (3H, d, J = 1.8 Hz), 1.54−1.44 (6H, m), 1.35−1.27 (6H, m), 0.96−0.92 (6H, m), 0.88 (9H, t, J = 7.3 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.6, 162.9, 130.5, 29.1, 27.5, 22.2, 13.8, 9.5. Rf 0.62 (EtOAc); IR νmax (film) 3402, 3202, 2955, 2924, 2847, 2361, 1659, 1597, 1458, 1397, 1312, 1072, 1312, 1072, 1003, 872, 733, 687 cm−1. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C16H34ONSn [M + H]+: 376.1657, found 376.1651. Tributyl(diiodomethyl)stannane. A solution of Bu3SnCHBr2 (300 mg, 0.65 mmol) in anhydrous acetone (4 mL) was treated with NaI (390 mg, 2.60 mmol), and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature in te absence of light for 24 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated and then diluted with hexane (10 mL) and the solids filtered off. The resultant solution was concentrated under vacuum in absence of light, diluted with chloroform (10 mL) and the newly precipitated solids were filtered off. The solution was concentrated once again under vacuum in the absence of light to afford 361 mg (quant) of the desired diiodomethylstannane as light yellow oil, which required no further purification. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.25 (1H, s), 1.64−1.58 (6H, m), 1.33 (6H, sext, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.12−1.09 (6H, m), 0.92 (9H, t, J = 7.2 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.6, 27.5, 15.7, 13.8, 13.1. Rf 0.50 (PE). Tributyl((1E,3S,4S,5R,6S,7E)-4,6-dimethoxy-3,5-dimethyl-8phenylocta-1,7-dienyl)stannane, 27. A 0 °C bright green suspension of anhydrous CrCl2 (135 mg, 1.1 mmol, previously gently flame-dried under vacuum) in freeze−thaw degassed DMF (1 mL) in the absence of light was treated via cannula with a solution of aldehyde 20 (21.8 mg, 0.08 mmol) and freshly prepared diiodomethyltributyltin (120 mg, 0.22 mmol) in freeze−thaw degassed DMF (1 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature in the dark until completion as indicated by TLC analysis (10 h). The reaction mixture was quenched by addition of H2O (5 mL), and the phases were separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 10 mL), and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under vacuum to afford the crude product as yellow oil. The crude product was purified by fast vacuum filtration on silica gel (90:10 hexane/EtOAc + 1% Et3N) to afford 22.3 mg (50%) of stannane 27 as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.40−7.20 (5H, m), 6.57 (1H, d, J = 16.2 Hz), 6.17 (1H, dd, J = 16.2, 6.9 Hz), 5.96 (1H, dd, J = 19.2, 7.2 Hz), 5.86 (1H, d, J = 19.2 Hz), 4.11 (1H, dd, J = 7.2, 1.1 Hz), 3.53 (3H, s), 3.34 (3H, s), 3.14 (1H, dd, J = 10,2, 2.4 Hz), 2.46 (1H, m), 1.63 (1H, m), 1.51−1.41 (6H, m), 1.33−1.21 (12H, m), 1.15 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.85 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), 0.84 (12H, t, J = 7.2 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 150.5, 137.1, 131.8, 129.7, 128.7, 127.5, 127.2, 126.5, 86.4, 81.4, 61.3, 56.7, 44.9, 42.7, 29.3, 27.4, 18.5, 13.8, 9.6, 9.5. Rf 0.47 (PE/EtOAc, 40:1, 1% Et3N). (E)-Methyl 3-iodobut-2-enoate. A mixture of (E)-3-iodobut-2enoic acid and (Z)-3-iodobut-2-enoic acid4a (E/Z ratio 1.7/1.0) (984 mg, 4.64 mmol) in anhydrous THF (50 mL) was treated with Cs2CO3 (1.51 g, 4.64 mmol), and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. Iodomethane (0.6 mL, 9.28 mmol) was then added, and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion as indicated by TLC analysis (12 h). The reaction was quenched with satd aq NH4Cl (30 mL), and the resulting layers were separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with diethyl ether (2 × 30 mL), and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (30 mL) and concentrated under vacuum to afford thick brown-yellow oil as crude product. Interestingly, 1H NMR

quenched by the sequential addition of satd aq Na2S2O3 (2 mL) and satd aq NaHCO3 (2 mL) and diluted with diethyl ether (5 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred for 20 min at room temperature, and the layers were separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 5 mL), and the combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum to afford 29.8 mg (quant.) of the desired aldehyde 20 as pale yellow oil, which was taken straight onto the next step without any further purification. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.77 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.43−7.23 (5H, m), 6.57 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 6.15 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 7.3 Hz), 4.11−4.06 (1H, m), 3.55 (1H, dd, J = 9.3, 2.6 Hz), 3.49 (3H, s), 3.33 (3H, s), 2.73− 2.65 (1H, m), 1.93−1.82 (1H, m), 1.20 (3H, d, J = 7.1 Hz), 0.87 (3H, d, J = 7.1 Hz). Rf 0.37 (hexane/EtOAc, 8:2). ((1E,3S,4R,5S,6S,7E)-8-Iodo-3,5-dimethoxy-4,6-dimethylocta-1,7-dienyl)benzene, 23. A stirred suspension of anhydrous CrCl2 (226 mg, 1.84 mmol, previously gently flame-dried under vacuum) in dry THF (2 mL) at room temperature was treated carefully with a solution of aldehyde 20 (29.8 mg, 0.11 mmol) and iodoform (255 mg, 0.65 mmol) in dry THF (1 mL) transferred via cannula. The resulting brown mixture was stirred in the dark at room temperature until completion as indicated by TLC analysis (30 min). The reaction mixture was quenched by addition of H2O (5 mL), and the phases were separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 10 mL), and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under vacuum to afford a crude yellow solid. Purification of the crude residue by flash column chromatography (silica gel, 95:5 hexane/EtOAc) yielded 43 mg (99%) of iodoolefin 23 as a white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6): δ 7.24−7.04 (5H, m), 6.77 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 9.2 Hz), 6.44 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 6.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 7.0 Hz), 5.74 (1H, d, J = 14.6 Hz), 4.10−4.07 (1H, m), 3.31 (3H, s), 3.16 (3H, s), 3.02 (1H, dd, J = 9.9, 2.1 Hz), 2.23−2.12 (1H, m), 1.71−1.60 (1H, m), 0.94 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.83 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, C6D6): δ 147.9, 137.2, 132.1, 129.5, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 126.7, 85.9, 80.9, 75.1, 61.1, 55.9, 43.5, 42.7, 18.2, 9.8. Rf 0.64 (hexane/EtOAc, 7.5:2.5); [α]24D +1.84 (c 1.0, CHCl3); IR νmax (film) 2963, 2924, 2361, 2334, 1728, 1651, 1585, 1597, 1497, 1451, 1335, 1188, 1088, 972, 748, 694 cm−1. (E)-Ethyl 3-(tributylstannyl)but-2-enoate. A 0 °C solution of diisopropylamine (0.3 mL, 1.87 mmol) in dry THF (1 mL) was treated dropwise with n-BuLi (1.6 M in hexanes, 1.2 mL, 1.87 mmol), and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir for 10 min. The solution was then treated with tributyltin hydride (0.5 mL, 1.78 mmol), and the reaction was cooled at −50 °C. At this point, the mixture was added to a suspension of CuBr·Me2S (368 mg, 1.78 mmol) in anhydrous THF (2 mL) at −50 °C, and the newly formed suspension was stirred at −50 °C for 30 min. The solution was then cooled to −95 °C and treated with a precooled solution of ethyl-2-butynoate (100 mg, 0.89 mmol) and dry MeOH (0.01 mL, 1.52 mmol) in anhydrous THF (3 mL). Once the addition was complete, the resulting mixture was stirred for 30 min at −95 °C, followed by warming up to −78 °C, where the reaction was stirred for an additional 2 h. The reaction was quenched with 5% aq NH4OH (5 mL), and the phases were separated. The aqueous phase was then extracted with Et2O (3 × 5 mL), and the combined organic layers dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under vacuum to afford a crude yellow oil. Purification of the crude product by flash column chromatography (silica gel, hexanes) gave 343 mg (96%) of (E)-ethyl 3-(tributylstannyl)but-2-enoate as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.96 (1H, q, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.16 (2H, q, J = 7.1 Hz), 2.39 (3H, d, J = 1.9 Hz), 1.54−1.45 (6H, m), 1.34−1.27 (9H, m), 0.97−0.93 (6H, m), 0.91−0.87 (9H, t, J = 7.3 Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.4, 164.6, 128.2, 59.7, 29.1, 27.5, 22.5, 14.5, 13.8, 9.5. Rf 0.08 (hexane); IR νmax (film) 2957, 2925, 2852, 1714, 1599, 1464, 1377, 1366, 1338, 1258, 1164, 1099, 1039, 960, 862, 689, 664 cm−1. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C18H37O2Sn [M + H]+: 405.1810, found 405.1813. (E)-3-(Tributylstannyl)but-2-enamide, 24. A 0 °C suspension of NH4Cl (170 mg, 3.18 mmol) in dry toluene (10 mL) was treated dropwise with a solution of AlMe3 (2 M in toluene, 1.6 mL, 3.18 mmol), and the resulting mixture was allowed to warm to room 6995

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo301210f | J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6989−6997

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

analysis of the crude mixture indicated that the product was a mixture of (E)-methyl 3-iodobut-2-enoate and (Z)-methyl 3-iodobut-2-enoate in a 15:1 E/Z ratio in favor of the desired E-isomer. Purification of the crude product by flash column chromatography (silica gel, 95:5 PE/ EtOAc) yielded 210 mg (32%) of the E-iodo-butenoate as a white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.64 (1H, q, J = 1.5 Hz), 3.70 (3H, s), 2.98 (3H, d, J = 1.5 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 164.6, 131.0, 120.7, 51.4, 31.0. Rf 0.6 (PE:EtOAc, 9.5:0.5); IR νmax (film) 2954, 2922, 2853, 1718, 1617, 1456, 1444, 1331, 1263, 1176, 1073, 907 cm−1. HRMS (CI+/ISO) calcd for C5H8O2I [M + H]+: 226.9569, found 226.9566. (E)-3-Iodobut-2-enamide, 28. A 0 °C suspension of NH4Cl (488 mg, 9.1 mmol) in dry toluene (8.5 mL) was treated by the dropwise addition of AlMe3 (2.0 M solution in toluene, 4.55 mL, 9.1 mmol), and the resulting solution was allowed to warm to room temperature. The reaction was cooled back down to 0 °C, and (E)-methyl 3iodobut-2-enoate (206 mg, 0.91 mmol) was added. The resulting mixture was stirred at 50 °C until completion as indicated by TLC analysis (16 h). The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature and diluted with EtOAc (10 mL). The solution was then cooled to 0 °C and quenched by addition of 10% HCl in brine (10 mL total volume). The phases were separated, and the organic layer was washed with satd aq NaHCO3 (20 mL) and brine (20 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under vacuum to afford a crude pale yellow oil. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel, 1:1 PE/EtOAc) to afford 97 mg (50%) of iodo-amide 28 as a white solid. Mp: 105−106 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.58 (1H, q, J = 1.5 Hz), 5.31 (2H, bs), 2.99 (3H, d, J = 1.5 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 165.7, 132.5, 117.6, 30.7. Rf 0.27 (PE:EtOAc, 1:1); IR νmax (film) 3354, 3181, 2359, 2330, 1651, 1597, 1397, 1364, 1302, 1067 cm−1. HRMS (CI+/ISO) calcd for C4H7NOI [M + H]+: 211.9572, found 211.9574. ((3S,4R,5S,6S,E)-3,5-dimethoxy-4,6-dimethyloct-1-ene-7ynyl)benzene, 30. A −78 °C solution of Ohira−Bestmann’s reagent (138 mg, 0.72 mmol) in dry THF (2.5 mL) was treated dropwise with NaOMe (25% solution in MeOH 0.17 mL, 0.72 mmol). After 20 min of stirring, a solution of aldehyde 20 (50 mg, 0.18 mmol) in dry THF (2.5 mL) was incorporated dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to slowly warm to room temperature over 30 min and was then quenched with satd aq NH4Cl (5 mL). The mixture was diluted with H2O (10 mL) and extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine (20 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under vacuum to afford the crude product as yellow oil. Initial purification by flash column chromatography (silica gel, elution gradient 100% hexanes to 9:1 hexane/EtOAc) followed by a second flash column purification (silica gel, 1:1 PE/dichloromethane) afforded 49 mg (99%) of alkyne 30 as a white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δH 7.42−7.40 (2H, m), 7.34−7.31 (2H, m), 7.26−7.23 (1H, m), 6.59 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 6.20 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 7.2 Hz), 4.15 (1H, ddd, J = 7.2, 2.2, 1.1 Hz), 3.57 (3H, s), 3.33 (3H, s), 3.15 (1H, dd, J = 9.9, 2.5 Hz), 2.77 (1H, qt, J = 7.0, 2.5 Hz), 2.06 (1H, d, J = 2.5 Hz), 1.99−1.93 (1H, m), 1.35 (3H, d, J = 7.1 Hz), 0.93 (3H, d, J = 7.1 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δC 136.9, 132.2, 129.4, 128.7, 127.7, 126.5, 85.1, 84.9, 81.1, 70.1, 61.5, 56.6, 42.9, 29.6, 18.4, 10.1. [α]27D +24.4 (c 1.0, CHCl3). (+)-Crocacin C, 3; (2Z,4E,6S,7S,8R,9S,10E)-7,9-Dimethoxy3,6,8-trimethyl-11-phenylundeca-2,4,10-trienamide, 25, and (2Z,4Z,6S,7S,8R,9S,10E)-7,9-Dimethoxy-3,6,8-trimethyl-11phenylundeca-2,4,10-trienamide, 26. Method A. A room temperature solution of iodoolefin 23 (43 mg, 0.11 mmol) and (E)-3(tributylstannyl)but-2-enamide 24 (45 mg, 0.12 mmol) in anhydrous THF (7 mL) was treated with CuI (3.4 mg, 0.65 mmol), AsPh3 (4.5 mg, 15 μmol), and Pd2(dba)3 (6 mg, 6 μmol), and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C until completion as indicated by TLC analysis (6 h). The reaction was quenched with H2O (5 mL), and the phases were separated. The organic layer was washed with brine (10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under vacuum to afford a crude yellow residue. The sample was purified on a Varian HPLC from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with SD-1 pumps, a model 325 UV−vis detector, a model 410

autosampler, and a model 701 fraction collector. Mobile phase A was water with 0.1% ammonium hydroxide and mobile phase B was acetonitrile. The flow rate was 60 mL/min. The method started at 40% B for 1 min, then raised to 80% B over the next 9 min, was held at 80% B for another minute, then raised to 95% B in 0.2 min, held at 95% for 1.5 min, then lowered back to 40% B in 0.2 min, and held at 40% B for an additional 1.5 min. The column was a 30 mm × 100 mm, 10 μm Gemini-NX from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). The UV collection was done using a wavelength of 254 nm. (+)-Crocacin C 3 eluted at 6.2 min. (+)-Crocacin C and the two isomeric (Z) analogues 25 and 26 were isolated in a 1.54/1.00/1.27 ratio, in a total yield of 11% (4.2 mg total weight). Method B. In a flame-dried 2−5 mL MW vial, stannane 27 (22.3 mg, 39.6 μmol) and the vinyl iodide (13 mg, 43.6 μmol) were dissolved in freeze−thaw degassed THF (2 mL), and the resulting homogeneous solution was treated with PdCl2(PPh3)2 (1.4 mg, 2 μmol, 5 mol %). The vial was submitted to MW irradiation (15 min, 100 °C), and then the reaction was filtered and concentrated under vacuum to afford a crude brown oily residue. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel 1:1 PE/EtOAc) to afford 7 mg (50%) of (+)-crocacin C 3 as a white solid. Method C. In a flame-dried 5 mL microwave vial under an inert atmosphere, a solution of alkyne 30 (50 mg, 183.5 μmol) in anhydrous THF (2.5 mL) was degassed by three freeze−pump−thaw cycles. PdCl2(Ph3P)2 (7.0 mg, 10.3 μmol) was then incorporated, and the solution was cooled to 0 °C before Bu3SnH (56 μL, 203 μmol) was added dropwise. The resultant brown solution was stirred at 0 °C until the starting material was consumed as indicated by TLC (25 min). Vinyl iodide 28 (42 mg, 197 μmol) was added, and the solution was heated to 100 °C in a microwave reactor for 15 min. The reaction mixture was filtered through a small pad of silica using EtOAc as the eluent, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to give crude yellow oil. Purification of the crude residue by flash column chromatography (silica gel, elution gradient 1:1 PE/EtOAc to 2:3 PE/EtOAc) afforded 46 mg (70%) of (+)-crocacin C 3 as a white solid. (+)-Crocacin C, 3. 1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 7.48−7.47 (2H, m), 7.34−7.31 (2H, m), 7.25−7.22 (1H, m), 6.70 (1H, bs), 6.59 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 6.26 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 7.3 Hz), 6.13 (1H, bs), 6.12−6.04 (2H, m), 5.80 (1H, s), 4.09−4.07 (1H, m), 3.52 (3H, s), 3.29 (3H, s), 3.16 (1H, dd, J = 9.6, 2.0 Hz), 2.61−2.56 (1H, m), 2.22 (3H, d, J = 1.1 Hz), 1.58−1.52 (1H, m), 1.17 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 0.85 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 169.0, 148.1, 137.9, 137.0, 135.1, 132.6, 130.5, 129.4, 128.3, 127.3, 122.1, 87.1, 81.8, 61.5, 56.5, 43.5, 40.8, 19.3, 13.5, 10.1. Rf 0.25 (PE:EtOAc, 1:1); [α]26D +54.0 (c 0.1, MeOH); IR νmax (film) 3479, 3395, 3343, 3184, 2963, 2926, 1655, 1601, 1449, 1368, 1261, 1088, 972 cm−1. HRMS (FAB+) calcd for C22H31O3NNa [M + Na]+: 380.2202, found 380.2207. Mp: 95−100 °C. (2Z,4E,6S,7S,8R,9S,10E)-7,9-Dimethoxy-3,6,8-trimethyl-11phenylundeca-2,4,10-trienamide, 25. 1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 7.82 (1H, d, J = 16.3 Hz), 7.51−7.47 (2H, m), 7.38− 7.29 (2H, m), 7.25−7.21 (1H, m), 6.71 (1H, bs), 6.59 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 6.26 (1H, dd, J = 15.9, 7.1 Hz), 6.07 (1H, bs), 6.05 (1H, dd, J = 16.2, 9.0 Hz), 5.69 (1H, bs), 4.09−4.07 (1H, m), 3.54 (3H, s), 3.30 (3H, s), 3.18 (1H, dd, J = 9.6, 2.1 Hz), 2.65−2.55 (1H, m), 1.90 (3H, d, J = 1.0 Hz), 1.58−1.52 (1H, m), 1.18 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), 0.86 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 169.0, 146.9, 137.9, 137.8, 132.7, 130.5, 129.4, 129.3, 128.3, 127.3, 120.1, 87.2, 81.9, 61.5, 56.5, 43.5, 41.2, 21.0, 19.3, 10.1. [α]26D +32.0 (c 0.1, MeOH); IR νmax (film) 3460, 3391, 3339, 3086, 2972, 2928, 1659, 1595, 1456, 1321, 1261, 1085, 1024, 750, 694, 677 cm−1. (2Z,4Z,6S,7S,8R,9S,10E)-7,9-Dimethoxy-3,6,8-trimethyl-11phenylundeca-2,4,10-trienamide, 26. 1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 7.50−7.47 (2H, m), 7.35−7.31 (2H, m), 7.26−7.23 (1H, m), 6.83 (1H, bs), 6.60 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 6.26 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 7.4 Hz), 6.14 (1H, bs), 5.89 (1H, d, J = 12.1 Hz), 5.84 (1H, s), 5.60 (1H, t, J = 11.3 Hz), 4.05−4.02 (1H, m), 3.52 (3H, s), 3.29 (3H, s), 3.10 (1H, dd, J = 9.6, 2.2 Hz), 3.07−2.98 (1H, m), 2.20 (3H, d, J = 1.1 Hz), 1.58−1.50 (1H, m), 1.18 (3H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), 0.79 (3H, d, J = 7.3 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 168.7, 148.9, 137.8, 6996

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo301210f | J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6989−6997

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Palkowitz, A. D.; Halterman, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6339− 6348. (13) Donohoe, T. J.; Basutto, J. A.; Bower, J. F.; Rathi, A. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1036−1039. (14) Kawai, N.; Mahadeo, S.; Uenishi, J. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 9049−9056. (15) (a) Overman, L. E.; Knoll, F. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 321− 324. (b) Grieco, P. A.; Takigawa, T.; Bongers, S. L.; Tanaka, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7587−7588. (c) Grieco, P. A.; Tuthill, P. A.; Sham, H. L. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 5006−5007. (d) Overman, L. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1984, 23, 579−586. (16) Takai, K.; Nitta, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7408−7410. (17) (a) Hodgson, D. M.; Boulton, L. T.; Maw, G. N. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 3713−3724. (b) Hodgson, D. M.; Foley, A. M.; Boulton, L. T.; Lovell, P. J.; Maw, G. N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 2923− 2928. (18) (a) Müller, S.; Liepold, B.; Roth, G. J.; Bestmann, H. J. Synlett 1996, 521−522. (b) Gilbert, J. C.; Weerasooriya, U. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1837−1845.

134.9, 133.0, 132.8, 130.6, 129.4, 128.4, 127.3, 121.3, 86.9, 81.9, 61.6, 56.4, 43.8, 36.0, 19.7, 19.5, 10.0. [α]26D −44.0 (c 0.1, MeOH); IR νmax (film) 3460, 3391, 3339, 3086, 2972, 2928, 1659, 1595, 1456, 1368, 1296, 1088, 1017, 747, 669 cm−1.

■

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

Characterization data of the described compounds and intermediates. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

■

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author

*E-mail: [email protected]. Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

■

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Dr. Ian Sword for postgraduate support (A.E.P.). The authors also thank Dr. Ian Sword and the EPSRC for funding.

■ ■

DEDICATION Dedicated to Professor Philip S. Beauchamp.

†

REFERENCES

(1) Kunze, B.; Jansen, R.; Höfle, G.; Reichenbach, H. J. Antibiot. 1994, 47, 881−886. (2) (a) Crowley, P. J.; Berry, E. A.; Cromartie, T.; Daldal, F.; Godfrey, C. R. A.; Lee, D. −W.; Phillips, J. E.; Taylor, A.; Viner, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 10345−10355. (b) Crowley, P. J.; Godfrey, C. R. A.; Viner, R. Synthesis and Chemistry of Agrochemicals VII; ACS Symposium Series 948; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2007; pp 93−103. (c) Crowley, P. J.; Aspinall, I. H.; Gillen, K.; Godfrey, C. R. A.; Devillers, I. M.; Munns, G. R.; Sageot, O. A.; Swanborough, J.; Worthington, P. A.; Williams, J. Chimia 2003, 57, 685−691. (3) Nising, C. F.; Hillebrand, S.; Rodefeld, L. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4062−4073. (4) (a) Feutrill, J. T.; Lilly, M. J.; Rizzacasa, M. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3365−3367. (b) Feutrill, J. T.; Lilly, M. J.; Rizzacasa, M. A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 525−527. (c) Feutrill, J. T.; Rizzacasa, M. A. Aust. J. Chem. 2003, 56, 783−785. (d) Feutrill, J. T.; Lilly, M. J.; White, J. M.; Rizzacasa, M. A. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4880−4895. (5) (a) Chakraborty, T. K.; Jayaprakash, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 497−499. (b) Chakraborty, T. K.; Jayaprakash, S.; Laxman, P. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9461−9467. (6) (a) Dias, L. C.; de Oliveira, L. G. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3951−3954. (b) Dias, L. C.; de Oliveira, L. G.; Vilcachagua, J. D.; Nigsch, F. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2225−2234. (7) (a) Sirasani, G.; Paul, T.; Andrade, R. B. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6386−6388. (b) Sirasani, G.; Paul, T.; Andrade, R. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 3648−3655. (c) Andrade, R. B. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2009, 41, 359−383. (8) Beşev, M.; Brehm, C.; Fürstner, A. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2005, 70, 1696−1708. (9) Candy, M.; Audran, G.; Bienayme, H.; Bressy, C.; Pons, J.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1354−1359. (10) (a) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Reddy, M. S.; Niranjan, N.; Prasad, A. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1779−1783. (b) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, M. S.; Rao, P. P.; Prasad, A. R. Synlett 2007, 2049−2052. (11) (a) Pasqua, A. E.; Ferrari, F. D.; Crawford, J. J.; Marquez, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 2114−2116. (b) Chen, M.; Roush, W. R. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1880−1883. (12) (a) Roush, W. R.; Palkowitz, A. D.; Ando, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6348−6359. (b) Roush, W. R.; Ando, K.; Powers, D. B.; 6997

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo301210f | J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6989−6997