Synthesis of Perspicamide A and Related Diverse Analogues: Their

Centre of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance (CBMR), Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Campus, Lucknow 226014, India. J. Org. Chem. ...
15 downloads 10 Views 1MB Size
Download PDF
Article pubs.acs.org/joc

Synthesis of Perspicamide A and Related Diverse Analogues: Their Bioevaluation as Potent Antileishmanial Agents Anand Kumar Pandey,† Rashmi Sharma,† Rahul Shivahare,‡ Ashish Arora,§ Neeraj Rastogi,⊥ Suman Gupta,‡ and Prem M. S. Chauhan*,† †

Division of Medicinal and Process Chemistry, ‡Parasitology Division, §Molecular & Structural Biology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226001, India ⊥ Centre of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance (CBMR), Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Campus, Lucknow 226014, India S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: The first protocol for the synthesis of perspicamide A and related diverse analogues has been developed from economical and readily available starting materials. Furthermore, a few synthesized analogues, 24a, 24b, 24c, 24d, and 24l, exhibited potent activity against Leishmania donovani with IC50 values ranging from 3.75 to 10.37 μM and a selectivity index (SI) ranging from 9.58 to 53.12, which is improved compared to the standard drug Miltefosine (IC50 12.4 μM and SI 4.1).

■

sedative and anti-inflammatory peptide frangufoline,14 etc. Perhaps even more importantly, quinoline-based molecules are landmarks for a broad range of biological activities including antimalarial,15 antibacterial,16 cytotoxic,17 DNA binding property,18 anti-inflammatory,19 and antileishmanial,20 etc. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the synthesis and medicinal utility of perspicamide A and related analogues has not been reported yet. Our group has also been engaged in the synthesis of small drug-like molecules using metal-catalyzed coupling protocols,21 condensation reactions,22 and a multicomponent approach.23 Thus, herein we disclose the first synthesis of perspicamide A and a wide range of structurally related analogues and their biological evaluation as potential antileishmanial agent employing an efficient and flexible route via Cu-mediated cross-coupling reaction under mild condition. Retrosynthesis. The idea for the synthetic route to perspicamide A (1) was developed by taking incremental steps backward from the final structure (Figure 2), where the synthons 7, 14, and 25 would be an obvious choice for the preparation of desired molecule. With regard to the construction of the desired architecture, benzyl protection, reduction, subsequent aza-Michael reaction, cyclization, benzyl protection, amidation, and finally copper-mediated crosscoupling reaction followed by selective deprotection may lead

INTRODUCTION Throughout the history of medicinal chemistry and pharmaceutical drug development, small-molecule natural products (SMNPs) have played and continue to play an invaluable role in drug discovery and have inspired ingenuity owing to their drug like assets.1 Usually it is found that active SMNPs have relatively poor drug properties,2 and thus some chemical manipulations are required to address such defficiencies.3 In this context, several drugs have emerged, such as topotecan, irinotecan (from camptothecin), taxotere (from taxol), etoposide, teniposide (podophyllotoxin derivatives), etc. upon modification of natural leads, and many more are in various stages of research.4 The quinoline nucleus containing metabolite perspicamide A (1) and B (2) (Figure 1), first isolated from the Australian ascidian Botrylloides persipicuum in 2005 by Quinn et al.,5 has attracted much attention as it is found in many drug-like compounds.6 The presence of the quinoline and enamide systems (separately) in a large number of functionalized molecules with wide variety of applications including medicinal chemistry,7 material science,8 and several reaction intermediates9 is well documented. From a medicinal point of view, macrolactone bearing an enamide side chain, such as salicylihalamide A and B (3 and 4, inhibitors of mamalian VATPases),10 CJ-12950 (5),11 and lobatamide A (6)12 (Figure 1) are well-known for their potent antitumor activity. Other important enamides include protease inhibitor TMC-95-A-D,13 © 2013 American Chemical Society

Received: November 30, 2012 Published: January 4, 2013 1534

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Figure 1. Perspicamide A and B (1, 2) and other biologically significant enamides (3−6).

Figure 2. Retrosynthetic analysis of perspicamide A (1).

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Quinoline Carboxamide (13)

to the formation of perspicamide A (1). The counterpart of the excised fragment, e.g., styryl iodide (16), is easily accessible, starting from 4-benzyloxy benzaldehyde (14).

■

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Styryl Iodide (16)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The synthetic route for both the fragments is given in Schemes 1 and 2. 2-Nitrophenol (7), used as precursor, was protected with benzyl bromide in presence of K2CO3 in DMF and reduced with Fe/acetic acid to give the corresponding 2benzyloxy aniline (9) in overall 65% yield. This aniline 9 was coupled to diethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DEAD) in MeOH via aza-Michael reaction to afford 10 in 84% yield.24 This early stage of the synthesis provides our first diversification point

(Figure 2) and paves the way for the synthesis of perspicamide A and related analogues. The intermediate 10 was subsequently cyclized in diphenylether (Ph2O) at 250 °C to get the desired skeleton, 1535

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Table 1. Optimization of the Coupling Reaction of Quinoline 2-Carboxamide (13) and Styryl Iodide (16)a

entry

catalyst

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

CuI CuI CuI CuI CuI CuI Cu2O CuTC Cu(OAc)2 Cu2O Cu(OTf)2

L

base

time (h)

yield (%)b

L1 L2 L2 L3 L4 L4 L4 L4 L5 L2

Cs2CO3 Cs2CO3 Cs2CO3 Cs2CO3 K2CO3 Cs2CO3 Cs2CO3 Cs2CO3 Cs2CO3 Cs2CO3 Cs2CO3 Cs2CO3

15 15 15 15 15 15 10 8 9 15 15 15

nrc nrc trace 62 nrc trace 74 82 76 15 nrc nrc

a Reaction conditions: 13 (0.4 mmol), 16 (0.4 mmol), catalyst (15 mol %), ligand (20 mol %), base (1 mmol), and solvent (5 mL), under nitrogen atmosphere at 85 °C. bIsolated yield. cNo product formation.

Table 2. Deprotection of Benzylated Analoguea to Perspicamide A (1)

entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

reagent Pd/C Pd/C Pd/C BBr3 BBr3 BCl3 BCl3 BCl3

equiv c

10 10c 10c 3 6 6 9 12

solvent

temp (°C)

time (min)

(%)1b

MeOH MeOH MeOH DCM DCM DCM DCM DCM

rt rt rt 35 35 35 35 35

15 30 60 30 60 60 60 120

0 0 0 d d 32 48 15

a Reaction condition: substrate 17 (1.0 equiv), reagent, and solvent (5 mL) under argon atmosphere. bIsolated yield. cWeight percent used. dMixture of uncharacterised product.

Et3 N as catalyst in DCM at reflux conditions (inert atmosphere) in overall 49% yield (Scheme 2).27 With both the key intermediates, 4,8-bis(benzyloxy)-quinoline-2-carboxamide (13) and 4-benzyloxy styryl iodide (16) in hand, we were ready to attempt the key coupling reaction with concomitant construction of benzyl protected perspicamide A (17). The coupling protocol for the desired molecule was optimized to obtain the best reaction conditions so that the efficiency of the protocol could be maintained. Several catalyst and ligands along with bases were optimized and the results are summarized in Table 1.

ethyl 4-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxylate (11) in good yield (69%),25 which upon a second benzyl protection followed by amidation with aqueous ammonia in MeOH/THF (1:1) led to the formation of the desired key intermediate 4,8-bis(benzyloxy)quinoline-2-carboxamide (13) in 79% yield. The other excised fragment 16, e.g., styryl iodide, was prepared from 4-benzyloxy benzaldehyde (14) in two steps: (i) the Knoevenagel condensation of malonic acid with 4-benzyloxy benzaldehyde (14) using 10 mol % piperidine as catalyst in pyridine at reflux conditions,26 and (ii) decarboxylative iodination with N-iodosuccinamide (NIS) using 20 mol % 1536

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Table 3. Synthesized Perspicamide A Related Analoguesa

1537

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Table 3. continued

a

Reaction conditions: substrate A (2.47 mmol), substrate B (2.47 mmol), Cu2O (15 mol %), DMEDA (20 mol %), Cs2CO3 (6.17 mmol), and THF (10 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere at 85 °C for 8−10 h. bIsolated yield.

catalyzed coupling was reported by Porco et al. where they used CuTC as catalyst.29 Later Buchwald et al. used CuI as catalyst and DMEDA as ligand to achieve the same.30 Further, Ma used dimethyl glycine as ligand to promote a similar reaction.31

The Cu-catalyzed C−N coupling of amides with styryl halides, the modified Goldberg reaction, is the most widely applicable reaction for the synthesis of enamides framework of natural products.28 The first enamide synthesis via metal1538

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Scheme 3. Synthesis of Perspicamide A Related Analogues 24a−24u

However, during optimization of catalyst, we found that Cu2O is more effective and economic compared to CuI, along with DMEDA as ligand and Cs2CO3 as base (entry 8, Table 1). Thus, coupling of 4,8-bis(benzyloxy)quinoline-2-carboxamide (13) with styryl halide (16) under the optimized reaction conditions (entry 8, Table 1) led to the formation of benzylprotected perspicamide A, which upon subsequent deprotection led to the formation of perspicamide A in 48% yield (Table 2). In the overall synthetic maneuver, relative stereochemistry was found to be in favor of the desired transdiastereoisomer. During the initial efforts of deprotection, the methylated analogue of perspicamide A (24a, Table 3, entry 1) was subjected to a deprotection reaction employing several Lewis acids, such as BBr3, Br2 in acetic acid, etc., and unfortunately this afforded a mixture of unidentified products (monitored by TLC). This might be due to the sensitive nature of the enamide bond in such a functional system. Therefore, we opted to use a protecting group that could be easily unmasked under mild conditions. Even though the easily cleavable benzyl group is used for protection, still the deprotection of O-benzylated perspicamide was optimized (Table 2), where 9.0 equiv of BCl3 in DCM under argon atmosphere was found to be the best reaction condition for deprotection.32 The structure of the synthesized natural product was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR (see Supporting Information) and HRMS and by comparison with literature.5 The synthetic protocol for perspicamide A related analogues is delineated in Scheme 3. The synthesis of these analogues was started with substituted anilines, the first point of diversification in the designed library. The second diversity point evolved during the syntheses of styryl halides where different aromatic aldehydes were used as precursor. Furthermore, during the hydroxyl protection a third diversity point arose where different alkyl halides are used for derivatization. Thus, the designed library holds several merits with a high level of diversity in synthesized molecules (Table 3). Unfortunately our catalytic system failed in the case of the less reactive styryl bromide, and hence further screening of

catalyst was carried out, where CuTC was found as efficient catalyst for the coupling of quinoline carboxamide with styryl bromide (see Supporting Information Table S1). After optimization of the catalytic system in the coupling reaction with different styryl halides as iodide and less reactive bromide, we were able to synthesize the related analogues of perspicamide A bearing other funtionalities in excellent yields (Table 4). Biological Screening Results. All of the synthesized compounds were evaluated for their antileishmanial activity where analogues 24a, 24b, 24c, 24d, and 24l were found to be potentially active with IC50 values or 4.16, 4.55, 3.75, 10.37, and 6.98 μM and SI values or 9.58, 53.12, 25.27, 38.57, and 22.91, respectively, which seems more promising than values for the standard drug Miltefosine (IC50 12.4 μM and SI 4.41) (Table 5).

■

CONCLUSION In conclusion, we have described the first synthesis of perspicamide A and related analogues and their potential utility as antileishmanial agents. A combination of well-optimized, easy-to-operate methodologies and only a small number of synthetic transformations increases both the practicability and efficiency of the synthesis. This strategy would allow an extremely valuable approach for a variety of substitution patterns and offers the chance of a future bioactivity-directed synthesis of defined perspicamide library.

■

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Material and Method for Biological Screening. Antiamastigote Activity. To assess the activity of compounds against the amastigote stage of the parasite, mouse macrophage cell line (J774A.1) infected with WHO reference strain (MHOM//IN/80/Dd8) of promastigotes (expressing luciferase firefly reporter gene) was used. Cells were seeded in a 96-well plate (4 × 103 cell/100 μL/well) in RPMI-1640 containing 10% fetal calf serum, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing stationary-phase promastigotes (4 × 104/100 μL/well). Promastigotes invade the macrophage and are transformed into amastigotes. The test compounds were added at 2fold dilutions up to 7 points in complete medium starting from 40 μM 1539

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Table 4. Synthesized Perspicamide A Related Analogues via Styryl Bromide Substratea

a

Reaction conditions: substrate C (1.0 mmol), substrate D (1.1 mmol), CuTC (15 mol %), DMEDA (20 mol %), Cs2CO3 (2.5 mmol), and THF (10 mL) or 1,4-dioxane (5 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere at 100 °C for 12 h, bIsolated yield. cells/100 μL/well) were incubated with test compounds for 72 h. The test compounds were added at 3-fold dilutions up to 7 points in complete medium starting from 400 μM concentration and were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified mixture of CO2 and 95% air in an incubator. Podophyllotoxin was used as a reference drug, and control wells containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) without compounds were also included in the experiment. Stock solutions of compounds were initially dissolved in DMSO and further diluted with fresh complete medium. After incubation, 25 μL of MTT reagent (5 mg/ mL) in PBS medium, followed by syringe filtration, was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. At the end of the incubation period, the supernatant was removed by inverting the plate completely

concentration after replacing the previous medium, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator for 72 h. After incubation, the drug-containing medium was decanted, and 50 μL of PBS was added in each well and mixed with an equal volume of Steady Glo reagent. After gentle shaking for 1−2 min, the reading was recorded in a luminometer.33 The values are expressed as relative luminescence units (RLU), and the data were transformed into a graphic program (Excel). The IC50 of antileishmanial activity was calculated by nonlinear regression analysis of the concentration response curve using the four parameter Hill equations. Cytotoxicity Assay. The cell viability was determined using the MTT assay.34 Exponentially growing cells (Vero Cell line) (1 × 105 1540

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

Table 5. In Vitro Antileishmanial Activity of Perspicamide Analogues against Intracellular Amastigotes and Their Cytotoxicitya compd no.

antiamastigote activity IC50 (μM)

cytotoxicity CC50 (μM)

selectivity index (SI)b

compd no.

antiamastigote activity IC50 (μM)

cytotoxicity CC50 (μM)

selectivity index (SI)b

1 17 24a 24b 24c 24d 24e 24f 24g 24h 24i 24j 24k

>40 >40 4.16 4.55 3.75 10.37 >40 >40 14.08 12.39 13.81 >20 20.73

NA NA 39.86 241.74 94.77 >400 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

NA NA 9.58 53.12 25.27 >38.57 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

24l 24m 24n 24o 24p 24q 24r 24s 24t 24u MF SSG

6.98 ND ND toxic toxic ND ND >20 ND ND 12.4 71.90

159.97 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 54.75 398.26

22.91 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.41 5.53

MF (Miltefosine) and SSG (Sodium Stibo-gluconate): Standard antileishmanial drugs IC50 >15 μM = inactive; IC50 > 5−15 μM = moderately active; IC50 < 5 μM = active compounds. ND = not done, NA = not available. bSI for each compound was calculated as ratio between, CC50 and IC50 against Leishmania amastigotes. a

without disturbing the cell layer, and 150 μL of pure DMSO was added to each well. After 15 min of shaking the readings were recorded as absorbance at 544 nm on a micro plate reader. The cytotoxic effect were expressed as 50% lethal dose, i.e., as the concentration of a compound that provoked a 50% reduction in cell viability compared to cells in culture medium alone. CC50 values were estimated as described by Huber and Koella.35 General Chemistry. NMR spectra were recorded on 300, 400, or 600 MHz spectrometers for 1H NMR and 50, 75, 100, or 150 MHz for 13 C NMR in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 with TMS as internal reference wherever mentioned. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) for 1H and 13C NMR spectra. Coupling constants J are reported in hertz (Hz). Multiplicities are reported as follows: singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), and multiplet (m). HRMS analyses were carried out on an electrospray ionization (ESI) apparatus using time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry. The reaction progress was routinely monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on precoated silica gel plates. Column chromatography was performed over silica gel (60−120) and (100−200) mesh. All compounds were characterized by TLC, 1H and 13C NMR, IR, and HRMS. Experimental Procedure for the Synthesis of Fragment 13. 2-(Benzyloxy)nitrobenzene (8). To a stirred solution of 2-nitro phenol (7) (2.0 g, 14.4 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) was added K2CO3 (4.0 g, 28.8 mmol) at room temperature, and the mixture was allowed to stir for 15 min followed by the addition of benzyl bromide (1.71 mL, 14.4 mmol). The reaction was allowed to stir at room temperature for 2 h. After completion (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was poured into water and extracted with ethyl acetate (4 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated brine solution, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure to get the titled compound 8 as a brown solid. Yield 2.89 g, 88%.36 2-(Benzyloxy)aniline (9). To a solution of 2-benzyloxy nitrobenzene (8) (2.89 g, 12.60 mmol) in acetic acid (10 mL) was added iron powder (3.55 g, 63.00 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated at 90 °C for 40 min. After completion of reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was filtered through a Celite pad followed by neutralization with 10% sodium bicarbonate solution and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography using 60−120 mesh silica gel with CHCl3/hexane (1:1) as eluent to get the intermediate 9 as a gummy solid. Yield 1.86 g, 74%.37 Diethyl 2-(2-(Benzyloxy)phenylamino)maleate (10). A solution of 2-benzyloxy aniline (9) (1.86 g, 9.36 mmol) in anhydrous methanol was treated with diethylethylenedicarboxylate (DEAD)

(1.80 mL, 11.23 mmol), and the reaction was allowed to stir for 6 h at room temperature. After completion of the reaction, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure followed by column chromatography using 60−120 mesh silica gel using 2% ethyl acetate/hexane as eluent to get intermediate 10 as yellow oil. Yield 2.90 g, 84%; IR (cm−1) 3448, 1732, 1618, 1216, 768, 697, 668; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.90 (s, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.49- 7.39 (m, 3H), 7.09 − 6.95 (m, 4H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 5.22 (s, 2H), 4.34 − 4.21 (m, 4H), 1.42 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.21 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.4, 164.3, 149.8, 148.0, 136.7, 130.2, 128.5, 127.8, 127.0, 124.4, 121.0, 120.7, 113.2, 93.2, 70.6, 61.8, 59.8, 14.4, 13.6 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C21H24NO5 370.1576, found 370.1583. Ethyl 8-(Benzyloxy)-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-2-carboxylate (11). The above aza-Michael product (10) (2.90 g, 7.85 mmol) was dissolved in diphenylether (DPE) and refluxed in a preheated oil bath at 250 °C for 10 min to provide cyclized quinolone ester 11. The crude reaction mixture was purified by column chromatography using 60−120 mesh silica gel with CHCl3 as eluent to get 11 as a red solid, mp 118−122 °C. Yield 1.75 g, 69%; IR (cm−1) 3349, 1718, 1559, 1332, 1252; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.89 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.43- 7.36 (m, 4H), 7.26 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.18 − 7.11 (m, 2H), 7.00 (s, 1H), 5.25 (s, 2H), 4.48 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.43 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3) δ 179.7, 162.5, 147.5, 136.1, 135.6, 130.7, 129.0, 128.7, 127.5, 127.0, 124.3, 117.6, 113.1, 111.6, 71.3, 63.4, 14.1 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C19H18NO4 324.1158, found 324.1167. Ethyl 4,8-Bis(benzyloxy)-quinoline-2-carboxylate (12). To a stirring solution of quinolone 2-ester (11) (1.75 g, 5.41 mmol) in DMF (5 mL), was added K2CO3 (1.50 g, 10.82 mmol), and the mixture was allowed to stir for 15 min at room temperature, followed by the addition of benzyl bromide (0.64 mL, 5.41 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated at 70 °C for 6 h. After completion (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was poured into water and extracted with ethyl acetate (5 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated brine solution, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure to get the titled compound 12 as a brown solid, mp 113−117 °C. Yield 1.81 g, 81%; IR (cm−1) 1718, 1508, 1258, 1220, 1045, 767, 697; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (s, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.51 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H),7.44 - 7.29 (m, 7H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.38 (s, 2H), 5.32 (s, 2H), 4.53 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.51 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.0, 162.2, 155.2, 148.3, 141.0, 137.0, 135.5, 128.8, 128.5, 127.9, 127.7, 127.2, 123.6, 114.0, 111.5, 101.6, 71.2, 70.7, 62.1, 14.3 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C26H24NO4 414.1627, found 414.1636. 1541

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

4,8-Bis(benzyloxy)-quinoline-2-carboxamide (13). To a stirring solution of 12 (1.39 g, 10.0 mmol) in MeOH/THF (1:1) (10 mL) was added 10 mL of aq ammonia (30% solution). The reaction mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 12 h (monitored by TLC). Solvent was removed under reduced pressure and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated brine solution and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using 60−120 mesh silica gel with 1% MeOH/CHCl3 as eluent to get 13 as a brown solid, mp 167−170 °C. Yield 1.33 g, 79%; IR (cm−1) 3387, 1632, 1553, 1457, 1041, 821; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.27 (s, 1H), 7.91- 7.86 (m, 2H), 7.55 − 7.43 (m, 11H), 7.18 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 6.00 (s, 1H), 5.36 (s, 4H) ppm; 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3 + DMSO-d6) δ 171.8, 167.0, 159.2, 154.7, 144.7, 143.8, 141.7, 140.4, 133.4, 133.3, 133.1, 132.6, 132.3, 132.0, 128.0, 118.9, 116.2, 103.9, 75.6, 75.2 ppm; HRMS EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C24H21N2O3 385.1552, found 385.1567. (E)-3-(4-(Benzyloxy)-phenyl)-acrylic Acid (15). This compound was obtained by the condensation of 4-(benzyloxy) benzaldehyde (14) (2.00 g, 9.43 mmol) and malonic acid (1.96 g, 18.86 mmol) with piperidine (0.19 mL, 1.18 mmol) in pyridine (10 mL) solvent for 3 h at 120 °C. After completion of reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was poured into a chilled solution of 10% aq hydrochloric acid. The corresponding cinnamic acid appeared as a white precipitate. The precipitate was filtered and washed with water to get 15 as a white solid. Yield 1.07 g, 89%.38 (E)-1-(Benzyloxy)-4-(2-iodovinyl)-benzene (16). To a stirred solution of (E)-3-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl) acrylic acid (15) (1.07 g, 4.21 mmol) in DCM (10 mL) was added Et3N (0.13 mL, 0.84 mmol) over a period of 10 min under argon atmosphere followed by the addition of N-iodosuccinamide (NIS) (1.14 g, 5.05 mmol), and the reaction mixture was allowed reaction for 30 min at 45 °C. The reaction was cooled, and solvent was evaporated at low temperature under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using 60−120 mesh silica gel with 2% EtOAc/hexane as eluent to get the titled compound 16 as a white solid. Yield 0.78 g, 55%.39 (E)-4,8-Bis(benzyloxy)-N-(4-(benzyloxy)-styryl)-quinoline-2carboxamide (17). To a oven-dried double neck round-bottom flask (rbf) equipped with magnetic stirring bar and 4,8-bis(benzyloxy)quinoline-2-carboxamide (13) (1.33 g, 3.46 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) were added (E)-1-(benzyloxy)-4-(2-iodovinyl)benzene (16) (1.16 g, 3.46 mmol), Cu2O (0.74 mg, 0.52 mmol), DMEDA (0.074 mL, 0.69 mmol), and Cs2CO3 (2.81 mg, 8.65 mmol) under an argon atmosphere. Then reaction mixture was degassed and backfilled several times with argon before being heated to 85 °C and allowed reaction to reflux for 8 h. The flask was then cooled to room temperature, the reaction mixture was filtered through a Celite pad, and the solution was evaporated under reduced pressure followed by column chromatography using 100−200 mesh silica gel with 15% EtOAc/ hexane as eluent to get the titled compound 17 as a yellow solid, mp 210−213 °C. Yield 1.68 g, 82%; IR (cm−1) 3458, 1643, 1502, 769; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.31 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 7.90−7.84 (m, 2H), 7.63−7.52 (m, 5H), 7.49−7.31 (m, 14H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.27 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 5.38(s, 4H), 5.08 (s, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.7, 161.6, 157.8, 154.5, 149.0, 139.9, 137.0, 135.5, 129.3, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.0, 127.9, 127.7, 127.4, 127.3, 127.1, 126.8, 123.6, 120.8, 115.1, 114.5, 114.1, 111.7, 111.4, 99.3, 71.1, 70.8, 70.0 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C39H33N2O4 593.2440, found 593.2448. (E)-4,8-Dihydroxy-N-(4-hydroxystyryl)-quinoline-2-carboxamide (1). To a stirred solution of 17 (500 mg, 0.84 mmol) in dry DCM (5 mL) at 0 °C was added BCl3 (1.0 M solution in methylene chloride) (0.67 mL, 7.6 mmol) dropwise for 15 min under nitrogen atmosphere, followed by stirring at room temperature for 1 h. After completion (monitored by TLC), the reaction was quenched with methanol (10 mL) followed by evaporation under vacuum on a rotavapor and column chromatography using 100−200 mesh silica gel with 2% MeOH/ CHCl3 as eluent to get the titled compound 1 as a yellow solid, mp >250 °C. Yield 130 mg, 48%; IR (cm−1) 3435, 1641, 1524, 1216, 766; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.88 (s, 1H),

11.25 (d, J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 10.01 (s, 1H), 9.45 (S, 1H), 7.59−7.57 (m, 2H), 7.47−7.42 (m, 2H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.54 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 162.8, 161.5, 156.4, 153.5, 147.8, 138.2, 127.6, 127.2, 126.6, 122.1, 120.6, 115.7, 114.1, 111.8, 111.7, 102.0 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C18H15N2O4 323.1032, found 323.1036.5 General Procedure for the Preparation of 19a−19e. Different anilines (18a−18d) (20.0 mmol) were dissolved in 10 mL of anhydrous methanol followed by dropwise addition of DEAD (24.0 mmol), and the reaction was allowed to run for 4 h at room temperature. After completion of reaction as indicated by TLC, the resulting mixture was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by column chromatography using 60−120 mesh silica gel (eluent hexane/EtOAc) affording the corresponding azaMichael product 19a−19d in 80−85% yield.40a−c Diethyl 2-(2-Bromophenylamino)-maleate (19d). Yellow oil. Yield 83%; IR (cm−1) 3461, 3278, 1733, 1668, 1616, 1277, 1215, 1148, 1035, 760; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.71 (s, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.54 (s, 1H), 4.25−4.15 (m, 4H), 1.32 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.13 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.3, 164.1, 147.1, 139.1, 133.2, 127.8, 125.1, 121.6, 116.1, 96.4, 62.3, 60.4, 14.5, 13.8 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C14H17BrNO4 342.0341, found 342.0349. General Procedure for the Preparation of 20a−20d. Different substituted diethyl 2-(phenylamino) maleate (7.50 mmol) was added to neat polyphosphoric acid (PPA) and allowed reaction to run for 2 h at 135 °C. The reaction mixture was neutralized with sodium bicarbonate, and the product was purified by simple washing with cold water or extracted with CHCl3 from aqueous solution. The organic layer was dried with Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure provided 20a−20d in 75−85% yield.41 Ethyl 8-Bromo-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-2-carboxylate (20d). Brown solid, mp 150−153 °C. Yield 83%; IR (cm−1) 3367, 1719, 1634, 1523, 1272, 768, 600; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.39 (s, 1H), 8.30 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.27−7.22 (m, 1H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 4.54 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.48 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.8, 162.2, 136.58, 136.56, 135.8, 127.3, 125.8, 124.7, 112.1, 111.7, 63.4, 14.0 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C12H11BrNO3 295.9922, found 295.9924. General Procedure for the Preparation of 21a−21g. To a stirred solution of different substituted quinolone 2-ester (20a−20d) (5.0 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) was added K2CO3 (10.0 mmol) followed by addition of alkyl halide (methyl or ethyl iodide 10.0 mmol or benzyl bromide 5.0 mmol), and the reaction allowed to run for 4−6 h. After completion of reaction, the mixture was poured into water and extracted with ethyl acetate, and the organic layer was dried with Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure to provide a solid mass of product (21a−21g) in 85−95% yield.42,43 Ethyl 8-Chloro-4-methoxy-quinoline-2-carboxylate (21c). Brown solid, mp 125−128 °C. Yield 89%; IR (cm−1) 1718, 1626, 1276, 1070, 712, 756; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.13 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (s, 1H), 7.48 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 4.11 (s, 3H), 1.50 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.5, 163.6, 149.8, 144.8, 134.3, 130.6, 127.2, 123.5, 120.8, 100.8, 62.5, 56.3, 14.2 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C13H13ClNO3 266.0584, found 266.0595. Ethyl 8-Chloro-4-ethoxy-quinoline-2-carboxylate (21d). Brown solid, mp 108 °C. Yield 88%; IR (cm−1) 1721, 1622, 1269, 1068, 759, 686; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.19 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 4.39 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.61 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.50 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.8, 163.2, 150.0, 145.0, 134.4, 130.8, 127.3, 123.8, 121.2, 101.6, 65.2, 62.7, 14.5, 14.4 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C14H15ClNO3 280.0740, found 280.0747. Ethyl 4-(Benzyloxy)-8-methoxyquinoline-2-carboxylate (21e). Creamy color solid, mp 157−153 °C. Yield 83%; IR (cm−1) 1714, 1268, 1228, 1068, 754, 698; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 1542

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

7.46−7.37 (m, 4H), 5.90 (s, 1H), 5.37 (s, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.8, 163.1, 151.2, 144.9, 135.3, 134.2, 128.9, 128.8, 127.9, 127.5, 125.1, 123.7, 122.1, 99.5, 71.3 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C17H14BrN2O2 357.0239, found 357.0247. 4-Ethoxy-8-methoxyquinoline-2-carboxamide (22g). Brown solid, mp 167−170 °C. Yield 88%; IR (cm−1) 3472, 1635, 1362, 743; 1 H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.20 (s, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H),7.68 (s, 1H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.83 (s, 1H), 4.36 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 4.04 (s, 3H), 1.57 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.5, 162.9, 155.4, 149.8, 139.8, 127.3, 123.6, 114.0, 108.9, 99.2, 64.8, 56.2, 14.6 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C13H15N2O3 247.1083, found 247.1087. General Procedure for Styryl Iodide (16a−16e). Starting material cinnamic acids are available commercially, although some of the substrates used were prepared in our laboratory. Different cinnamic acids (only substrates with electron-donating groups on the aromatic ring) (4.0 mmol) were dissolved in dichloromethane (6 mL), subsequently Et3N (0.8 mmol) was added followed by addition of N-iodosuccinamide (NIS) (4.80 mmol), and the reaction was allowed to run for 15−30 min. After completion of reaction, evaporated the solvent at low temperature on a rotavapor followed by column chromatography using 60−120 mesh silica gel provided the corresponding substituted (E)-styryl iodide (16a−16e) in 50−70% yield.27 General Procedure for Styryl Bromide (23a−23c). Different cinnamic acids (4.0 mmol) were dissolved in dichloromethane (6 mL), subsequently Et3N (0.8 mmol) was added followed by addition of Nbromosuccinamide (NBS) (4.80 mmol), and the reaction was allowed to run for 15−30 min. Evaporattion of the solvent at low temperature on a rotavapor followed by column chromatography using 60−120 mesh silica gel provided the corresponding substituted (E)-styryl bromide (23a−23c) in 60−85% yield.27 General Procedure for Coupling Product (24a−24p). To a oven-dried double-neck rbf equipped with magnetic stirring bar and substituted quinoline-2-carboxamide (22a−22g) (2.47 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) were added different (E)-styryl iodides (16a−16e) (2.47 mmol), Cu2O (0.37 mmol), DMEDA (0.49 mmol), and Cs2CO3 (6.17 mmol) under argon atmosphere. Then reaction mixture was degassed and backfilled several times with argon before being heated to 85 °C, and the reaction mixture was allowed to reflux for 8−10 h. The flask was then cooled to room temperature and filtered through a Celite pad, and sthe olution was evaporated under reduced pressure followed by column chromatography using 100−200 mess silica gel with 20% ethyl acetate/hexane as eluent to get the titled compounds 24a−24p as a yellow solids. Yield 75−91%. (E)-4,8-Dimethoxy-N-(4-methoxy-styryl)-quinoline-2-carboxamide (24a). Yellow solid, mp 175−178 °C. Yield 88%; IR (cm−1) 3471, 2366, 1653, 1504, 1074, 752; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 10.11 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.63 (dd, J1 = 11.2 Hz, J2 = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H),7.36 (d, J = 8.5, 2H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.7, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.6, 2H), 6.46 (d, J = 14.6, 1H), 4.13 (s, 3H), 4.10 (s,3H), 3.81 (s, 3H) ppm; 13 C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 164.4, 162.2, 158.9, 155.6, 149.6, 139.7, 129.4, 127.7, 127.2, 123.7, 121.1, 114.7, 114.5, 114.1, 109.2, 99.0, 56.6, 56.3, 55.6 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C21H21N2O4 365.1501, found 365.1501. (E)-N-(4-(Benzyloxy)-styryl)-4,8-dimethoxy-quinoline-2-carboxamide (24b). Yellow solid, mp 157−159 °C. Yield 78%; IR (cm−1) 3456, 1649, 1566, 1207, 784; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 10.15 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84−7.79 (m, 2H), 7.67−7.36 (m, 9H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 6.48 (d, J = 14.4 Hz, 1H), 5.10 (s, 2H), 4.16 (s, 3H), 4.13 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 163.6, 161.8, 157.8, 155.2, 149.2, 139.4, 137.0, 129.3, 128.6, 127.9, 127.4, 126.8, 123.4, 120.8, 115.1, 114.4, 113.8, 108.9, 98.6, 70.0, 56.2, 56.0 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C27H25N2O4 441.1814, found 441.1811. (E)-4,8-Dimethoxy-N-(2,5-dimethoxystyryl)-quinoline-2-carboxamide (24c). Yellow solid, mp 128−131 °C. Yield 84%; IR (cm−1) 3408, 1667, 1547, 1222, 789; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 10.20 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 7.84−7.75 (m, 3H), 7.55 (t, J = 7.9 Hz,

7.74 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (s, 1H), 7.61−7.56 (m, 3H), 7.47−7.38 (m, 3H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.46 (s, 2H), 4.45 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.98 (s, 3H), 1.39 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.7, 161.8, 156.3, 148.1, 140.3, 136.4, 129.1, 128.9, 128.7, 128.2, 123.1, 113.2, 110.1, 102.4, 70.6, 61.9, 56.2, 14.7 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C20H20NO4 338.1392, found 338.1398. Ethyl 4-(Benzyloxy)-8-bromo quinoline-2-carboxylate (21f). Light brown solid, mp 152−155 °C. Yield 82%; IR (cm−1) 1715, 1629, 1259, 1064, 696; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.27 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.51−7.42 (m, 6H), 5.36 (s, 2H), 4.56 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.53 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.5, 162.6, 150.1, 145.8, 135.1, 134.3, 128.8, 128.7, 127.8, 125.8, 123.6, 121.8, 101.8, 71.1, 62.4, 14.2 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C19H17BrNO3 386.0392, found 386.0396. Ethyl 4-Ethoxy-8-methoxy-quinoline-2-carboxylate (21g). Brown solid, mp 132−135 °C. Yield 88%; IR (cm−1) 1719, 1633, 1257, 1053, 759, 682; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (s, 1H), 7.52 (t, J = 7.9 Hz 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 4.38 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.05 (s, 3H), 1.60 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.52 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.6, 162.2, 155.5, 147.9, 140.1, 127.5, 123.1, 113.0, 108.1, 101.0, 64.3, 61.9, 55.6, 14.1, 14.0 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C15H18NO4 276.1236, found 276.1244. General Procedure for the Preparation of 22a−22g. To a stirred solution of different substituted quinoline 2-esters (5.0 mmol) in MeOH/ THF (1:1) (10 mL) was added 30% NH4OH solution (15 mL) followed by stirring for 12 h at room temperature, converting the ester to amide. Solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator and extracted with ethyl acetate followed by washing with brine solution. The combined organic layers dried over Na2SO4 provided substituted quinoline 2-carboxamide. Purification through crystallization with ethanol provided quinoline 2-carboxamides in 80−90% yield.44 4,8 Dimethoxy Quinoline-2-carboxamide (22a). Brown solid, mp 162−165 °C. Yield 90%; IR (cm−1) 3439, 1642, 1391, 767; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 8.25 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.4, 1H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 8, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 7.7, 1H), 5.78(s, 1H), 4.11(s, 3H), 4.05(s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 167.6, 163.9, 155.6, 150.0, 139.9, 127.6, 123.7, 114.0, 109.1, 98.9, 56.5, 56.37 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C12H12N2O3 233.0848, found 233.0857. 8-Chloro-4-methoxyquinoline-2-carboxamide (22c). Brown solid, mp 225−230 °C. Yield 89%; IR (cm−1) 3444, 1638, 1399, 770; 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.23 (s, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (s, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.77 (s, 1H), 4.14 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3 + DMSO-d6) δ 171.4, 168.7, 156.1, 148.6, 138.2, 135.2, 131.5, 128.2, 125.8, 103.2, 61.2 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C11H10ClN2O2 237.0431, found 237.0442. 8-Chloro-4-ethoxyquinoline-2-carboxamide (22d). Dark brown solid, mp 209−212 °C. Yield 88%; IR (cm−1) 3456, 1613, 1388, 774; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.23 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (s, 1H), 7.46 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.87 (s, 1H), 4.38 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.58 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.0, 163.4, 151.1, 144.1, 133.7, 130.6, 126.8, 123.8, 121.3, 99.1, 65.2, 14.6 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C12H12ClN2O2 251.0587 found 251.0594. 4-(Benzyloxy)-8-methoxyquinoline-2-carboxamide (22e). Light brown solid, mp 192−195 °C. Yield 82%; IR (cm−1) 3468, 1615, 1364, 748; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.12 (s, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.75−7.73 (m, 2H), 7.57−7.54 (m, 3H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.46 (s, 2H), 3.99 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.3, 161.6, 154.95, 150.1, 138.8, 135.8, 128.5, 128.1, 127.7, 127.5, 122.4, 112.9, 109.5, 99.4, 69.9, 55.7 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C18H17N2O3 309.1239, found 309.1243. 4-(Benzyloxy)-8-bromo-quinoline-2-carboxamide (22f). Creamy white solid, mp 185−188 °C. Yield 80%; IR (cm−1) 3464, 1628, 1365, 771; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.27 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 8.07 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (s, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1543

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

11.1, 1H), 8.20 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 7.4, 1H), 7.77 (s, 1H), 7.68 (dd, J1 = 11.4, J2 = 14.4, 1H), 7.52 (t, J = 7.9, 1H), 6.65 (s, 2H), 6.43 (d, J = 14.5, 1H), 4.18 (s, 3H), 3.91 (s,6H), 3.86 (s, 3H) ppm; 13 C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 163.2, 160.3, 152.4, 149.3, 142.6, 136.3, 132.5, 130.8, 129.6, 125.9, 122.5, 120.6, 120.1, 114.0, 101.8, 97.5, 59.9, 55.5, 55.1 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C22H22ClN2O5 429.1217, found 429.1207. (E)-8-Chloro-4-ethoxy-N-(4-(methylthio)-styryl)-quinoline-2carboxamide (24k). Yellow solid, mp 125−128 °C. Yield 86%; IR (cm−1) 3426, 2367, 1652, 1587, 1435, 1023, 667; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 10.19 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 8.21 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.71 (dd, J1 = 11.5 Hz, J2 = 14.4 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 6.43 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.49 (s, 3H), 1.62 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 163.8, 161.8, 150.7, 144.1, 137.0, 133.8, 133.6, 130.9, 127.4, 127.1, 126.4, 124.0, 122.1, 121.6, 114.6, 99.4, 65.5, 16.3, 14.7 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C21H20ClN2O2S 399.0856, found 399.0859. (E)-4-(Benzyloxy)-N-(4-(benzyloxy)-styryl)-8-methoxyquinoline-2-carboxamide (24l). Yellow solid, mp 179−182 °C. Yield 75%, IR (cm−1) 3422, 2306, 1639, 1541, 767; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) 10.14 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (s, 2H), 7.55−7.14 (m, 14H), 7.16 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.49 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (s, 2H), 5.10 (s, 2H), 4.14 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 162.7, 161.8, 157.8, 155.3, 149.2, 139.5, 137.0, 135.5, 129.3, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 127.9, 127.7, 127.4, 126.8, 123.5, 120.8, 115.2, 114.3, 114.0, 109.0, 99.6, 70.8, 70.1, 56.0 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C33H29N2O4 517.2127, Found 517.2129. (E)-4-(Benzyloxy)-8-methoxy-N-(4-methoxystyryl)-quinoline-2-carboxamide (24m). Yellow solid, mp 155−158 °C. Yield 78%; Rf = 0.70 (30% EtOAc: Hexane); IR (cm−1) 3444, 2317, 1639, 1543, 759; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 10.21 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 7.87−7.85 (m, 2H), 7.63−7.33 (m, 9H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.88−6.86 (d, 2H), 6.47 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 5.37 (s, 2H), 4.10 (s, 3H), 3.81 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 163.0, 162.1, 158.9, 155.5, 149.6, 139.9, 135.8, 129.4, 129.1, 128.8, 128.0, 127.7, 127.2, 123.8, 121.1, 114.7, 114.5, 114.3, 109.3, 100.0, 71.1, 56.3, 55.6 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C27H25N2O4 441.1814, Found 441.1811. (E)-4-(Benzyloxy)-8-bromo-N-(4-methoxystyryl)-quinoline2-carboxamide (24n). Yellow solid, mp 148−151 °C. Yield 76%; IR (cm−1) 3429, 2298, 1634, 1504, 769; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 10.17 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (s, 1H), 7.65−7.37 (m, 9H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.46 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (s, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 163.1, 161.1, 158.7, 150.5, 144.5, 135.1, 134.2, 128.8, 128.6, 127.7, 127.4, 126.9, 124.8, 123.5, 122.0, 120.4, 114.6, 114.2, 99.4, 71.2, 55.3 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C26H22BrN2O3 489.0814, Found 489.0819. (E)-4-Ethoxy-8-methoxy-N-(4-(methylthio)-styryl)-quinoline2-carboxamide (24o). Yellow solid, mp 147−150 °C. Yield 88%; IR (cm−1) 3458, 1685, 1647, 1349, 1069, 746; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 10.25 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.71−7.65 (m, 2H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.33−7.31 (m, 2H), 7.21−7.19 (m, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 4.09 (s, 3H), 2.48 (s, 3H), 1.60 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13 C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 163.3, 162.4, 155.5, 149.5, 139.8, 136.8, 133.9, 127.6, 127.4, 126.4, 123.8, 122.4, 114.4, 114.3, 109.2, 99.5, 65.1, 56.3, 16.4, 14.7 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C22H23N2O3S 395.1429, found 395.1439. (E)-4-Ethoxy-8-methoxy-N-(4-methoxystyryl)-quinoline-2carboxamide (24p). Yellow solid, mp 107−110 °C. Yield 84%; IR (cm−1) 3445, 2337, 1669, 1513, 738; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 10.27 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.62 (dd, J1 = 11.2 Hz, J2 = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.35− 7.33 (m, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (m, 2H), 6.47 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 4.09 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 1.59 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 163.2, 162.3, 158.9, 155.5, 149.7, 139.8, 129.5, 127.5, 127.1, 123.8, 121.2, 114.7,

1H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.86−6.72 (m, 3H), 4.16 (s, 3H), 4.14 (s, 3H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 163.6, 161.9, 155.3, 153.8, 150.9, 149.2, 139.4, 127.4, 126.2, 123.4, 123.2, 113.7, 112.9, 112.3, 111.3, 109.7, 108.9, 98.6, 56.3, 56.2, 56.0, 55.8 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C22H23N2O5 395.1607, Found 395.1611. (E)-4,8-Dimethoxy-N-(3,4,5-trimethoxystyryl)-quinoline-2carboxamide (24d). Yellow solid, mp 198−200 °C. Yield 88%, IR (cm−1) 3344, 1676, 1469, 1234, 760; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 10.19 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 7.85−7.78 (m, 2H), 7.71 (dd, J1 = 11.5 Hz, J2 = 14.4 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (s, 2H), 6.46 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 4.17 (s, 3H), 4.13 (s, 3H), 3.92 (s, 6H), 3.87 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 163.6, 162.0, 155.1, 153.3, 149.0, 132.1, 127.4, 123.4, 121.9, 114.7, 113.7, 108.8, 102.8, 98.5, 60.8, 56.1, 56.0 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C23H25N2O6 425.1713, found 425.1722. (E)-4-Methoxy-N-(4-methoxystyryl)-quinoline-2-carboxamide (24e). Yellow solid, mp 124−127 °C. Yield 81%; IR (cm−1) 3447, 2357, 1663, 1544, 742; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 10.08 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.78−7.72 (m, 2H), 7.64 (m, 2H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.45 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (s, 3H), 3.82 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ 162.7, 160.6, 157.5, 149.2, 146.3, 129.4, 128.0, 127.8, 126.0, 125.8, 121.1, 121.0, 119.5, 113.2, 113.1, 96.8, 56.2, 54.2 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C20H19N2O3 335.1396, found 335.1407. (E)-N-(2,5-Dimethoxystyryl)-4-methoxyquinoline-2-carboxamide (24f). Yellow solid, mp 144−147 °C. Yield 86%; IR (cm−1) 3449, 1663, 1563, 736; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 10.17 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 8.52 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.82− 7.72 (m, 3H), 7.60 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (m, 3H), 4.14 (s, 3H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 3.81 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 162.7, 160.7, 152.7, 149.8, 149.2, 146.4, 129.4, 128.1, 126.1, 124.9, 122.1, 121.2, 121.0, 111.9, 111.1, 110.2, 108.5, 96.8, 55.2, 54.8 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C21H21N2O4 365.1501, found 365.1490. (E)-4-Methoxy-N-(4-(methylthio)-styryl)-quinoline-2-carboxamide (24g). Yellow solid, mp 139−142 °C. Yield 91%; IR (cm−1) 3474, 2196, 1661, 1542, 782; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 10.05 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.98−7.65 (m, 3H), 7.60 (t, J = 14.9 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.35 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 2.41 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 164.1, 162.1, 150.5, 147.8, 137.0, 133.7, 130.8, 129.4, 127.4, 126.4, 122.6, 122.4, 122.3, 114.3, 98.2, 56.6, 16.4 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C20H19N2O2S 351.1167, found 351.1176. (E)-8-Chloro-4-methoxy-N-(4-methoxystyryl)-quinoline-2carboxamide (24h). Yellow solid, mp 178−181 °C. Yield 82%; IR (cm−1) 3434, 2372, 1656, 1477, 1219, 772; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 10.15 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (s, 1H), 7.64 (dd, J1 = 11.4 Hz, J2 = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.45 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 4.16 (s, 3H), 3.82 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 164.2, 161.3, 158.7, 150.6, 133.5, 130.6, 128.8, 126.9, 126.8, 123.6, 121.1, 120.5, 114.7, 114.2, 98.6, 56.5, 55.3 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C20H18ClN2O3 369.1006, found 369.1012. (E)-8-Chloro-N-(2,5-dimethoxystyryl)-4-methoxyquinoline2-carboxamide (24i). Yellow solid, mp 221−224 °C. Yield 84%; IR (cm−1) 3441, 2344, 1638, 1543, 742; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 10.23 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (t, J = 12.4 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.85- 6.69 (m, 3H), 4.16 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.82 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ164.1, 161.4, 153.7, 150.8, 150.4, 143.7, 139.2, 133.6, 130.6, 126.9, 125.8, 123.5, 123.0, 121.1, 114.0, 113.0, 112.1, 111.3, 110.0, 98.6, 56.5, 56.2, 55.8 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C21H20ClN2O4 399.1112, found 399.1114. (E)-8-Chloro-4-methoxy-N-(3,4,5-trimethoxystyryl)quinoline-2-carboxamide (24j). Yellow solid, mp 234−236 °C. Yield 84%; mp 236 °C; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 10.21 (d, J = 1544

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

■

114.5, 114.3, 109.2, 99.6, 65.1, 56.3, 55.6, 14.8 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C22H23N2O4 379.1580, found 379.1592. General Procedure for the Preparation of 24q−24u. To an oven-dried double neck rbf equipped with magnetic stirring bar and substituted quinoline-2-carboxamide (2.47 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (5 mL) or dry THF (10 mL) were added different (E)-styryl bromides (2.47 mmol), CuTC (0.37 mmol), DMEDA (0.49 mmol), and Cs2CO3 (6.17 mmol) under argon atmosphere. Then reaction mixture was degassed and backfilled several times with argon before being heated to 100 °C, and the reaction mixture was allowed to reflux for 8−12 h. After consumption of starting material as indicated by thin layer chromatography (TLC), the flask was then cooled to room temperature and filtered through a Celite pad, and the solution was evaporated under reduced pressure followed by column chromatography using 100−200 mess silica gel with 20% ethyl acetate/exane as eluent to afford the corresponding enamide products 24q−24u in 72− 77% yield. (E)-4-Methoxy-N-styrylquinoline-2-carboxamide (24q). Yellow solid, mp 128−131 °C. Yield 72%; IR (cm−1) 3617, 1655, 1224, 761; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): δ 10.13 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 8.24 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.77−7.70 (m, 3H), 7.59 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.47 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (s, 3H) ppm; 13 C NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz): δ 164.0, 162.0, 150.4, 147.6, 136.4, 130.7, 129.3, 128.8, 127.3, 126.9, 125.8, 122.5, 122.4, 122.2, 114.6, 98.1, 56.4 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C19H17N2O2 305.1290, found 305.1296. (E)-N-(4-tert-Butylstyryl)-4-methoxyquinoline-2-carboxamide (24r). Yellow solid, mp 142−145 °C. Yield 77%; IR (cm−1) 3628, 1649, 1222, 763; δ 1H NMR (CDCl3), 600 MHz): 10.10 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 8.23 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.72−7.67 (m, 2H), 7.58 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (q, J = 8.5 Hz, 4H), 6.45 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 9H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz): δ 163.9, 161.9, 150.4, 150.0, 147.6, 133.6, 130.6, 129.2, 127.2, 125.8, 125.6, 122.4, 122.2, 121.8, 114.5, 98.0, 56.4, 34.7, 31.4 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C23H25N2O2 361.1838, found 361.1842. (E)-8-Chloro-N-(4-isopropylstyryl)-4-methoxyquinoline-2carboxamide (24s). Yellow solid, mp 152−155 °C. Yield 74%; IR (cm−1) 3622, 1661, 1212, 767; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 10.16 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.71 (dd, J1 = 11.5 Hz, J2 = 14.3 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.38(m, 2H), 7.21 (m, 2H), 6.47 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 4.16 (s, 3H), 2.94 (m, 1H), 1.27 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 164.5, 161.7, 150.8, 148.0, 144.1, 134.0, 133.9, 131.0, 127.2, 127.1, 126.1, 123.9, 121.7, 121.4, 115.2, 98.9, 56.9, 34.1, 24.2 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C22H22ClN2O2 381.1370, found 381.1388. (E)-N-(4-tert-Butylstyryl)-8-chloro-4-ethoxyquinoline-2-carboxamide (24t). Yellow solid, mp 188−191 °C. Yield 76%; IR (cm−1) 3616, 1654, 1216, 761; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): 10.17 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.71 (dd, J1 = 11.5 Hz, J2 = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (q, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 6.46 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.61 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.33 (s, 9H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz): δ 163.6, 161.6, 150.6, 150.1, 143.9, 133.6, 133.5, 130.7, 126.9, 125.8, 125.6, 123.8, 121.7, 121.4, 114.9, 99.2, 65.3, 34.7, 31.4, 14.6 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C24H26ClN2O2 409.1683, found 409.1680. (E)-8-Chloro-4-ethoxy-N-styryl quinoline-2-carboxamide (24u). Yellow solid, mp 152−155 °C. Yield 73%; IR (cm−1) 3618, 1655, 1216, 764; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz): 10.17 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.73−7.69 (m, 2H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.60 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz): δ 163.6, 161.6, 150.5, 143.9, 136.4, 133.6, 131.6, 130.7, 128.8, 128.1, 126.96, 126.94, 125.9, 123.8, 122.3, 121.4, 121.2, 115.0, 104.4, 99.2, 65.3, 14.6 ppm; HRMS (EI) calcd for [M + H]+ C20H18ClN2O2 353.1057, found 353.1051.

Article

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

1

H and 13C NMR data for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

■

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author

*E-mail: [email protected]; premsc58@ hotmail.com. Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

■

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A.K.P. and R.S. are thankful to CSIR, NewDelhi for SRFs. We thank SAIF division, CSIR-CDRI for the analytical facilities. We also thank to Dr. Raja Roy for his valuable support in this project. CDRI communication number is 8378.

■

REFERENCES

(1) (a) Wilson, R. M.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8329. (b) Newman, D. J.; Cragg, G. M. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 3110. (2) (a) Nadin, A.; Hattotuwagama, C.; Churcher, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1114. (b) Ganesan, A. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 12, 306. (3) Ghosh, A. K. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 7967. (4) (a) Kingston, D. G. I. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 496. (b) Butler, M. S. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 475. (5) McKay, M. J.; Carroll, A. R.; Quinn, R. J. J. Nat. Prod 2005, 68, 1776. (6) See Supporting Information Table S3 for drug likeness (Lipinski parameter) of synthesized molecule calculated via www.molinspiration. com. (7) (a) Tseng, C. H.; Lin, R. W.; Chen, Y. L.; Wang, G. J.; Ho, M. L.; Tzeng, C. C. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 3103. (b) Reddy, M. V. R.; Akula, B.; Cosenza, S. C.; Lee, C. M.; Mallireddigari, M. R.; Pallela, V. R.; Subbaiah, D. R. C. V.; Udofa, A.; Reddy, E. P. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 5174. (8) (a) Danel, A.; Gondek, E.; Kityk, I. Opt. Mater. 2009, 32, 267. (b) Kuroda, T.; Suenaga, K.; Sakakura, A.; Handa, T.; Okamoto, K.; Kigoshi, H. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006, 17, 524. (9) Larock, R. C. Comprehensive Organic Transformations: A Guide to Functional Group Preparations; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999. (b) Fürstner, A.; Dierkes, T.; Thiel, O. R.; Blanda, G. Chem.Eur. J. 2001, 7, 5286. (10) (a) Erickson, K. L.; Beutler, J.; Cardellina, J. H., II; Boyd, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8188. (b) Yet, L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4283. (11) Dekker, K. A.; Aiello, R. J.; Hirai, H.; Inagaki, T.; Sakakibara, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Thompson, J. F.; Yamauchi, Y.; Kojima, N. J. Antibiot. 1998, 51, 14. (12) Galinis, D. L.; McKee, T. C.; Pannell, L. K.; Cardellina, J. H., II; Boyd, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8968. (13) Kohno, J.; Koguchi, Y.; Nishio, M.; Nakao, K.; Kuroda, M.; Shimizu, R.; Ohnuki, T.; Komatsubara, S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 990. (14) Han, Y. N.; Kim, G. Y.; Han, H. K.; Han, B. H. Arch. Pharm. Res. 1993, 16, 289. (15) Sharma, M.; Chauhan, K.; Chauhan, S. S.; Kumar, A.; Singh, S. S.; Saxena, J. K.; Agarwal, P.; Srivastava, K.; Kumar, S. R.; Puri, S. K.; Shah, P.; Siddiqi, M. I.; Chauhan, P. M. S. Med. Chem. Commun. 2012, 3, 71. (16) Eswaran, S.; Adhikari, A. V.; Chowdhury, I. H.; Pal, N. K.; Thomas, K. D. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 3374. (17) Lee, H. Y.; Chang, J. Y.; Nien, C. Y.; Kuo, C. C.; Shih, K. H.; Wu, C. H.; Chang, C. Y.; Lai, W. Y.; Liou, J. P. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 8517. (18) Boger, D. L.; Chen, C. H.; Saionz, K. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7.

1545

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Article

(19) Smits, R. A.; Lim, H. D.; Hanzer, A.; Zuiderveld, O. P.; Guaita, E.; Adami, M.; Coruzzi, G.; Leurs, R.; Esch, I. J. P. D. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 2457. (20) Fourtnet, A.; Barrios, A. A.; Munoz, V.; Hocquemiller, R.; Cave, A.; Bruneton, J. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1993, 37 (4), 859. (21) (a) Tyagi, V.; Khan, S.; Bajpai, V.; Gauniyal, H. M.; Kumar, B.; Chauhan, P. M. S. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 1414. (b) Tyagi, V.; Khan, S.; Giri, A.; Gauniyal, H. M.; Sridhar, B.; Chauhan, P. M. S. Org. Lett. 2012, 14 (12), 3126. (22) Sharma, M.; Pandey, S.; Chauhan, K.; Sharma, D.; Kumar, B.; Chauhan, P. M. S. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 929. (23) Pandey, S.; Khan, S.; Singh, A.; Gouniyal, H. M.; Kumar, B.; Chauhan, P. M. S. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77 (22), 10211. (24) Edmont, D.; Rocher, R.; Plisson, C.; Chenault. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 1831. (25) Kikuchi, K.; Tagami, K.; Hibi, S.; Yoshimura, H.; Tokuhara, N.; Tai, K.; Hida, T.; Yamauchi, T.; Nagai, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1215. (26) Simpson, C. J.; Fitzhenrya, M. J.; Stamford, N. P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6893. (27) Das, J. P.; Roy, S. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7861. (28) (a) Evano, G.; Blanchard, N.; Toumi, M. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3054. (b) Cesati, R. R., III; Dwyer, G.; Jones, R. C.; Hayes, M. P.; Yalamanchili, P.; Casebier, D. S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 26. (c) Meketa, M. L.; Weinreb, S. M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5. (d) Toumi, M.; Couty, F.; Evano, G. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9003. (e) Tang, S.; Erickson, K. L. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 5. (f) Toumi, M.; Couty, F.; Evano, G. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9003. (29) (a) Ogawa, T.; Kiji, T.; Hayami, Kazuo.; Suzuki, H. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1443. (b) Zhang, S.; Zhang, D.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2312. (c) Shen, R., Jr.; Porco, J. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 9. (30) Jiang, L.; Job, G. J.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 20. (31) (a) Pan, X.; Cai, Q.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 11. (b) Wang, J.; Schaeffler, L.; He, G.; Ma, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 6717. (32) Yoshino, T.; Sato, I.; Hirama, M. Org. Lett. 2012, 14 (16), 4290. (33) Porwal, S.; Chauhan, S. S.; Chauhan, P. M. S.; Shakya, N.; Verma, A.; Gupta, S. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 5793. (34) Mosmann, T. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55. (35) Huber, W.; Koella, J. C. Acta Trop. 1993, 55, 257. (36) Manna, S.; Maity, S.; Rana, S.; Agasti, S.; Maiti, D. Org. Lett. 2012, 14 (7), 1736. (37) Dai, Q.; Xie, X.; Xu, S.; Ma, D.; Tang, S.; She, X. Org. Lett. 2011, 13 (9), 2302. (38) Simpson, C. J.; Fitzhenrya, M. J.; Stamford, N. P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6893. (39) Bull, J. A.; Mousseau, J. J.; Charette, A. B. Org. Lett. 2008, 10 (23), 5485. (40) (a) Rothstein, M. J. Org. Chem. 1957, 22 (3), 324. (b) Zhu, Q.; Jiang, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Qi, C. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 4604. (c) Iwanami. Nippon Kagaku Zasshi 1961, 82, 632. (41) Fisons Limited, Patent No. US4328341A1, 1982. (42) Merck & Co., Inc.; Banyu Pharmaceutical Co., LTD, Patent WO 2007/11809A1, 2007. (43) Baker, J. T.; Duke, C. C. Aust. J. Chem. 1976, 29 (5), 1023. (44) Langry, K. C. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1994, 26 (4), 429.

1546

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo3025626 | J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1534−1546