Synthetic Graphene Oxide Leaf for Solar Desalination with Zero

Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST

Article

Synthetic Graphene Oxide Leaf for Solar Desalination with Zero Liquid Discharge Casey Finnerty, Lei Zhang, David L. Sedlak, Kara L. Nelson, and Baoxia Mi Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03040 • Publication Date (Web): 11 Sep 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 11, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

1 2

Synthetic Graphene Oxide Leaf for Solar Desalination with Zero Liquid Discharge

3 4

Revision submitted to

5 6


7 8

August 29, 2017

9 10 11

Casey Finnerty, Lei Zhang, David L. Sedlak, Kara L. Nelson, Baoxia Mi*

12 13 14

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

15

University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

16 17 18 19

*

The author to whom correspondence should be addressed. fax: +1-510-643-5264

e-mail: [email protected]; tel.: +1-510-664-7446,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


20

ABSTRACT

21

Water vapor generation through sunlight harvesting and heat localization by plasmonic and

22

carbon-based porous thin film materials holds great promise for sustainable, energy-efficient

23

desalination and water treatment. However, the applicability of such materials in high-salinity

24

environment emphasizing zero liquid discharge brine disposal has not been studied. This paper

25

reports the characterization and performance of a nature-inspired synthetic leaf made of graphene

26

oxide (GO) thin film material, which exhibited broadband light absorption and excellent stability

27

in high-salinity water. Under 0.82-sun illumination (825 W/m2), a GO leaf floating on water

28

generated steam at a rate of 1.1 liters per m2 per hour (LMH) with a light-to-vapor energy

29

conversion efficiency of 54%, while a GO leaf lifted above water in a tree-like configuration

30

generated steam at a rate of 2.0 LMH with an energy efficiency of 78%. The evaporation rate

31

increased with increasing light intensity and decreased with increasing salinity. During a long-

32

term evaporation experiment with a 15 wt.% NaCl solution, the GO leaf demonstrated stable

33

performance despite gradual and eventually severe accumulation of salt crystals on the leaf

34

surface. Furthermore, the GO leaf can be easily restored to its pristine condition by simply

35

scraping off salt crystals from its surface and rinsing with water. Therefore, the robust high

36

performance and relatively low fabrication cost of the synthetic GO leaf potentially unlock a new

37

generation of desalination technology that can be entirely solar-powered and achieve zero liquid

38

discharge.

1


Page 2 of 29

Page 3 of 29


39

INTRODUCTION

40

As water resources dwindle while demands soar, desalination is becoming a viable water

41

treatment option to augment water supplies. Major advances have been made in recent years to

42

reduce the energy consumption of desalination technologies. For example, state-of-the-art

43

reverse osmosis (RO) membrane systems desalinate seawater with a recovery rate of 50% while

44

consuming as little as 2 kWh/m3, which is only 25% higher than the practical minimum energy

45

requirement.1 However, as feed water salinity increases, the energy consumption, operating

46

pressure, and fouling/scaling potential of the membrane system increase. This issue makes it very

47

difficult and costly to further enhance the recovery of an RO-based desalination system or

48

operate it under high salinity conditions.2 In the meantime, existing brine treatment technologies

49

such as zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) systems are particularly energy-intensive. For example, the

50

most widely used technology, which relies on mechanical vapor compression (MVC)-based brine

51

concentrators and crystallizers, consumes 20-25 kWh/m3 and 52-66 kWh/m3, respectively.2

52

Recently, brine concentrators based on membrane processes such as forward osmosis3 and

53

membrane distillation

54

low-grade heat as an energy source, but it is unclear if they offer substantial advantages over

55

existing MVC-based concentrators. Because high energy consumption remains a major barrier to

56

ZLD, innovative approaches that are more sustainable and energy-efficient than current

57

technologies are desirable.

58

4

have been the subject of increasing interest due to their ability to use

Recent developments in photothermal steam generation have greatly enhanced the solar 5

59

light-to-heat conversion efficiency

and hold immense promise for increasing the overall

60

efficiency of desalination and water treatment. In this process, materials exhibiting mesoscopic

2



61

porosity and efficient light absorption6-12 are used for localized heat transfer from the light-

62

absorbing material to water in pores. However, the absorption bandwidth of the plasmonic

63

nanoparticles frequently used for absorbing light and converting it to heat under surface plasmon

64

resonance depends on their size and shape,13 which increase the complexity and cost of the

65

materials.14, 15 Additionally, plasmonic nanoparticle films tend to be fragile and thus limit their

66

use under realistic operation conditions.

67

In contrast, the robust and inexpensive carbon-based materials such as graphene,5, 16

68

graphene oxide (GO),17-19 and graphite20 are natural broadband light absorbers that are capable of

69

absorbing about 97% of incident sunlight, making them an ideal material for sustainable solar-

70

powered desalination.

71

prior to their effective use for photothermal steam generation. This is because hydrophilic

72

materials like GO readily swell or dissolve in water21 and are thus unsuitable for direct water

73

treatment without necessary modification,22-24 while hydrophobic materials like graphene and

74

black carbon cannot maintain good contact with water and thus have limited effectiveness in

75

transferring heat to water.

76

However, further development of carbon-based materials is required

Looking to nature, mangrove trees rely on a complex salt filtration process involving 25

to thrive in waters with a salinity higher than that of seawater.26

77

passive water transport

78

Evaporation of water from leaf stomata under solar irradiation, together with capillary action,

79

creates a negative pressure that transports water from the growing medium into the roots,

80

through the xylem, and eventually to the leaves. Coupled with such water transpiration,

81

mangrove trees have developed two salt-regulating mechanisms. One is to partially exclude salt

82

from water at their roots to minimize the accumulation of salt in their xylem and leaves, and the

3


Page 4 of 29

Page 5 of 29


83

other is to excrete salt from glands, which are ~30 µm in diameter and mostly distributed over

84

the upper surface of mangrove leaves.27 By mimicking the water transpiration and salt-excreting

85

capability of mangroves, we may innovate an artificial tree system that simultaneously acts as a

86

water purifier and a salt crystallizer, leading to a solar-powered desalination technology with

87

ZLD capability and eliminating the two energy-intensive steps — brine concentration and

88

crystallization — required by the existing technologies.

89

This paper reports the first-phase study of a nature-inspired technology for solar-

90

powered desalination with ZLD by using synthetic leaves to enable photothermal water

91

evaporation. We used GO to fabricate a synthetic leaf that is stable in water and capable of

92

generating steam with a high energy conversion efficiency. The evaporation performance of the

93

synthetic GO leaf was evaluated in two configurations of the solar desalination system: (1) a

94

floating configuration, in which the GO leaf floated on and was in direct contact with bulk water,

95

and (2) a tree configuration, in which the GO leaf was lifted above and connected via a water-

96

absorbing sheet to bulk water. Infrared thermal imaging was used to visualize the evaporation

97

mechanism of each configuration. The effects of light intensity and water salinity on the

98

performance of the GO leaf in the tree configuration were systematically investigated. Lastly, the

99

durability and reusability of the GO leaf operated in high-salinity conditions were studied to

100

assess its potential for long-term effective treatment of highly saline water.

101

MATERIALS AND METHODS

102

Chemicals. Chemicals needed for GO synthesis included graphite flakes with 99% purity

103

(Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA), sodium nitrate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), sulfuric acid

104

(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), potassium permanganate (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH), and

4



105

hydrogen peroxide (30% solution, Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH). Additionally, hydrochloric

106

acid (37% solution, Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) and ethanol (Koptec, King of Prussia, PA)

107

were used as washing solutions. Fabrication of the synthetic GO leaf required

108

triethylenetetramine (TETA) and 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDGE) (Sigma-Aldrich, St.

109

Louis, MO) as crosslinking agents to stabilize GO nanosheets. Cellulosic filter paper (Whatman,

110

Maidstone, United Kingdom) was used as a substrate. Deionized water was produced by a

111

Barnstead Smart2Pure water purification system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).

112

GO Nanosheet Preparation.

113

procedure adapted from a previous study,24 which was based on the modified Hummers’

114

method.28, 29 Briefly, 5 g of powdered graphite flakes was oxidized in a mixture of 2.5 g of

115

sodium nitrate, 115 mL of sulfuric acid, and 15 g of potassium permanganate in a 35°C water

116

bath for 30 min, then transferred to a 98°C water bath and diluted by 230 mL of deionized water,

117

where it remained for 15 min. After cooling for 10 min, the mixture was diluted to 700 mL and

118

then added with 5 mL of hydrogen peroxide. The suspension was filtered using a polyethylene

119

terephthalate fiber, and the filtrate was centrifuged at 8,000 x g for 2 h with an Avanti J-30I

120

centrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN). The supernatant was decanted and the

121

precipitate was washed in successive cycles of deionized water, hydrochloric acid, and ethanol

122

using the centrifuge until the supernatant reached pH 7. Next, the GO precipitate was freeze-

123

dried at -50°C and under a pressure of less than 0.2 mbar in a freeze dryer (FreeZone 1,

124

Labconco, Kansas City, MO) to obtain GO powder. The GO was then resuspended in a 20 g/L

125

solution by sonication with a Q500 Sonicator (Qsonica, Newton, CT) in an ice bath at an

126

amplitude of 80% for 2 h. The resulting GO suspension was purified by placing it in a dialysis

127

bag and soaking the bag in 2000 mL deionized water, which was replaced daily for 6 days or

GO nanosheets were synthesized from graphite flakes using a

5


Page 6 of 29

Page 7 of 29


128

until the water conductivity stabilized.

129

GO Leaf Fabrication.

130

nanosheets with TETA and BDGE.30 As schematically illustrated in Figure 1, 0.5 mL of 20 g/L

131

GO suspension was first mixed with 0.1 mL of 0.01 M sodium hydroxide in a 2 mL tube on ice.

132

The solution was then mixed with an Analog Mini Vortexer (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) for

133

1 min and placed back on ice. Next, 24 µL of TETA was added and the solution was vortex-

134

mixed for 1 min and placed back on ice. Then, 65 µL of BDGE was added and the solution was

135

vortex-mixed before placing the tube in an ice bath that was sonicated at 40% amplitude for 4

136

min. Two circular coupons, each with a diameter of approximately 4.5 cm, were cut from the

137

filter paper with a circle cutter (Fiskars, Finland). The coupons were dip-coated in the GO-

138

TETA-BDGE solution and left undisturbed at room temperature for 1 min, leading to a GO mass

139

loading density of about 0.29 mg/cm2 on the coupon. The coupons were then frozen by placing

140

them on a plastic petri dish wrapped in aluminum foil and suspending it in liquid nitrogen for 2

141

min. The petri dish with the coupons was placed in a freeze dryer (Fisher Scientific, Hampton,

142

NH) overnight at -50°C and under a pressure of less than 0.2 mbar, and then the coupons were

143

transferred to a 100°C oven and stored for 24 h to facilitate the crosslinking reaction. After that,

144

the coupons were soaked in deionized water for 24 h, during which the water was changed at

145

least 5 times. Finally, the resulting GO-TETA-BDGE coupons were stored at 60°C in an Isotemp

146

General-Purpose Heating and Drying Oven (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) to remove any

147

residual water.

The synthetic GO leaf was prepared by crosslinking the GO

148

FIGURE 1

149

GO Leaf Characterization. To investigate the stability of the synthetic GO leaf, its elemental

6



150

compositions before and after solar irradiation were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron

151

spectroscopy (XPS). To verify the light absorption capability of the GO leaf, its absorption

152

spectrum was measured using an ASD QualitySpec Pro UV-Vis spectrophotometer with a

153

Muglight attachment (ASD Inc., Boulder, CO). The absorption spectrum of the filter paper

154

substrate was also collected as a control to determine light absorption enhancement by GO. The

155

deposition of GO-TETA-BDGE onto the filter paper substrate was verified by collecting the

156

absorption spectra with an iS50 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Thermo Fisher

157

Scientific, Waltham, MA). Lastly, the pore size and thickness of the GO leaf were determined by

158

visualizing it with a Gemini Ultra-55 analytical field emission scanning electron microscope

159

(SEM) (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

160

Solar Evaporation Experiments and Evaluation. Inspired by the water transpiration

161

process of a natural tree, a bench-scale setup was built to evaluate the solar evaporation

162

performance of the synthetic GO leaf. As shown in Figure 2, the synthetic GO leaf was placed on

163

top of a water reservoir (100 mL beaker with an inner diameter of 4.5 cm) by positioning it on a

164

piece of polystyrene sheet. Water was transported from the bulk water to the GO leaf by capillary

165

action through a water-absorbing sheet (Nalgene Versi-Dry Surface Protectors, Thermo Fisher

166

Scientific, Waltham, MA). To promote good contact between the GO leaf and the water absorber,

167

the two materials were sandwiched together using two sheets of polystyrene plastic. As a control,

168

a floating configuration was evaluated, in which the beaker was filled with deionized water and

169

the GO leaf was placed directly on the water surface. Furthermore, baseline tests on water

170

evaporation in the absence of a GO leaf were conducted for the tree and floating configurations,

171

respectively.

7


Page 8 of 29

Page 9 of 29

172


FIGURE 2

173

The evaporation experiment was started by irradiating the water in the reservoir (with or

174

without a GO leaf installed) with artificial sunlight, which was produced by a 1,000-watt large

175

area light source solar simulator (Spectra-Physics, Stratford, CT) and had a solar spectrum

176

comparable to that of natural sunlight over the visible light region (Figure S1). A P-8001 mass

177

balance (Denver Instrument, Bohemia, NY) was placed beneath the light source of the solar

178

simulator to record the mass of water remaining in the reservoir at 1-min intervals during

179

irradiation cycles. The evaporation rate was then calculated as the change in the recorded mass of

180

water normalized by the leaf area and the corresponding time interval, that is, the slope of the

181

curve that depicted the relationship between the mass of water evaporated per unit leaf area and

182

the irradiation time. The same analysis was also performed for all control experiments (where

183

light irradiation was not applied) to obtain baseline evaporation rates in dark conditions. The

184

light intensity and solar spectrum were obtained by an LX1330B lux meter (Precision Vision,

185

Woodstock, IL) and an EPP 2000 radiometer (StellarNet Inc., Tampa, FL), respectively. Unless

186

otherwise specified, each solar experiment was performed with a light intensity of 825 W/m2,

187

which corresponds to 0.82-sun illumination since 1,000 W/m2 is often considered as the default

188

value for one sun condition in related literature.17

189

taking infrared images with a Ti100 infrared camera (Fluke Corporation, Everett, WA) before

190

irradiation and at regular time intervals during irradiation.

191

Solar Desalination Performance Evaluation. The stabilized evaporation rates for the tree

192

configuration were determined by running the evaporation experiments for at least 5 h using bulk

193

NaCl solutions of different initial salinities (1.7, 3.5, 5.25, and 7 wt.%), representing 0.5, 1.0, 1.5,

8

The temperature evolution was monitored by



Page 10 of 29

194

and 2.0 times the concentration (3.5 wt.%) of NaCl in seawater. The crystal formation on the GO

195

leaf surface was examined by SEM when the salinity of the solution remaining in the reservoir

196

reached a certain level (~8.8 wt.% NaCl). The long-term evaporation performance of the GO leaf

197

was examined using 15 wt.% NaCl solution (~4 times seawater salinity), and the effects of salt

198

crystals formed over the leaf surface on temperature distribution and evaporation performance

199

were investigated. The reusability of the material was assessed by scraping off the accumulated

200

salt crystals from the GO leaf using a metal scoopula and briefly soaking it in deionized water

201

for 5 min before reusing the cleaned GO leaf in another evaporation cycle.

202

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

203

Properties of GO Leaf.

204

photothermal capability, hydrophilicity, and low cost. The TETA-BDGE-crosslinked GO

205

nanosheets were deposited across the whole depth of the filter paper, as indicated by the change

206

of color from white to black on both top and bottom surfaces of the filter paper after GO

207

deposition (Figure S2).

208

dissolving in water) and durability (to resist mechanical damages), as the GO leaf did not exhibit

209

signs of cracking or tearing after repeated folding and unfolding in either dry or wet/humid

210

condition (Figure S3).

211

elemental composition of the GO leaf due to sunlight irradiation were small.

GO was selected as the solar absorber in this study because of its

Such a fully interwoven structure led to excellent stability (to avoid

Furthermore, XPS analysis (Figure S4) revealed that the changes in

212

A major advantage of the GO leaf is its broadband light absorption capability, which is

213

critical for enhancing the overall energy efficiency of solar evaporation. As shown in Figure 3A,

214

the light absorption of the GO leaf was consistently higher than that of the filter paper substrate.

215

Absorption throughout the visible and near infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum is

9


Page 11 of 29


216

attributable to both the broad absorption spectrum and surface roughness (which enhances

217

internal light scattering) of GO.17 Such mechanisms for photothermal conversion are

218

advantageous over plasmonic heating, which requires noble metals (e.g., gold and silver) and

219

complex material processing to convert narrowband to broadband light absorption.

220

The composition of the GO leaf was evaluated by FTIR. As shown in Figure 3B, the

221

FTIR spectrum of the GO leaf exhibits peaks at 1204, 1566, 1645, and 1724 cm-1 that are not

222

present in the spectrum of the filter paper, indicating the existence of epoxy, carboxylate, amide,

223

and ester groups, respectively, in the GO leaf. It is believed that the carboxylate and, to a lesser

224

extent, epoxy and ester peaks were likely contributed by GO, the amide peak was solely due to

225

TETA, and the epoxy and ester peaks were primarily associated with BDGE. The surface (Figure

226

3C-D) and cross-section (Figure 3E-F) SEM images reveal that the fabricated GO leaf was

227

around 170-µm-thick and had an extremely porous structure, both external and internal, created

228

by the crosslinked GO nanosheets on the cellulosic fibers of the filter paper substrate.

229

The pores of the 3D microporous network of the GO leaf had a planar diameter in the

230

range of 10 to 30 µm, similar to the size of stomatal openings in natural tree leaves. However,

231

unlike stomata, which mainly serve as gates to regulate the escape of water vapor,31, 32 the fixed-

232

sized openings of the GO leaf contributed to water evaporation in three different ways. First, the

233

presence of these pores increased the effective surface area and thus enhanced the overall rate of

234

evaporation. Second, because water diffuses much faster near the edge of a pore than at its center,

235

a phenomenon known as the perimeter effect,33 the rate of pore evaporation was higher than that

236

of bulk water evaporation. Third, the porous GO structure enabled effective heat localization by

237

directly transferring the heat generated by absorbed light to water within the pores.

10



238

Page 12 of 29

FIGURE 3

239

Heat Localization Enabled by Tree Configuration.

240

GO leaf in the floating configuration (where the GO leaf was in direct contact with bulk water)

241

and the tree configuration (where the GO leaf was lifted above and insulated from bulk water, as

242

assembled in Figure S5) were compared to understand how the GO leaf enhanced the water

243

evaporation through heat localization. The GO leaf heated up much faster than its control in the

244

floating configuration (Figure 4A-B) as well as in the tree configuration (Figure 4C-D). This is

245

because the photothermal properties of the GO leaf facilitated more light to be converted into

246

heat, increasing the temperature at the evaporation interface. The heat generated in the floating

247

configuration was partly transferred into the bulk water, as evidenced by an increase in the

248

temperature of bulk water, thereby reducing the amount of heat available for evaporation in the

249

GO leaf. In contrast, the bulk water did not significantly heat up in the tree configuration,

250

indicating that heat was mainly retained in the pores of the GO leaf. Note that compared with the

251

floating configuration, the tree configuration only led to a small increase of temperature at the

252

evaporation surface. This is because, although the tree configuration improved heat localization,

253

the corresponding higher rate of evaporation required more energy to vaporize additional water,

254

thus limiting the amount of heat available for increasing the temperature of the GO leaf.

255

The temperature evolutions of the

FIGURE 4

256

Solar Evaporation Performance.

257

configurations were examined. As shown in Figure 5A, the water evaporation rate (calculated as

258

the slope of the curve) of the GO leaf in the floating configuration was 1.1 LMH, marking a 59%

259

increase from 0.70 LMH of its control experiment without GO leaf. Similarly, the evaporation

The evaporation performances of both floating and tree

11


Page 13 of 29


260

rate of the GO leaf in the tree configuration was 2.0 LMH, which more than doubled the 0.88

261

LMH of its control without GO leaf.

262

The evaporation efficiency (i.e., light-to-vapor energy conversion efficiency), as

263

calculated in the Supporting Information with baseline dark-condition corrections (Figure S6),

264

increased from 20% for bulk water to 54% for the GO leaf in the floating configuration and 78%

265

for the GO leaf in the tree configuration. While both configurations relied on the photothermal

266

properties of the GO leaf to convert sunlight into usable heat, the evaporation rate for the tree

267

configuration was higher due to better heat localization at the evaporation surface. Figure 5B

268

illustrates the variation in the relative proportions of the total solar energy having different

269

ultimate fates — loss by light reflection and transmission, loss to the surrounding environment

270

through heat transport (i.e., conduction, radiation, and convection), and latent heat for phase

271

change (evaporation) — among different configurations under 0.82-sun illumination. Detailed

272

calculation of the energy distribution is explained in the Supporting Information. For both bulk

273

water and tree configurations without a GO leaf, most (72-83%) of the energy from the incident

274

light was lost due to light reflection and transmission. In contrast, adding the GO leaf in both

275

floating and tree configurations made it possible to capture significantly more solar energy while

276

reducing the amount of energy lost as reflected/transmitted light to 10%. Besides, the tree

277

configuration with a GO leaf was very energy-efficient viewing that only 12% of the total energy

278

was lost as heat into the environment. In contrast, the floating GO leaf configuration lost 36% of

279

the total energy to the bulk water that had a direct contact with the GO leaf. Therefore, a key

280

advantage of the tree configuration over the floating configuration is that more heat can be

281

locally trapped by the lifted GO leaf due to the air insulation between the GO leaf and bulk water,

282

thus significantly minimizing the amount of heat energy lost into the aqueous environment.

12



Page 14 of 29

283

Our data agreed well with literature data in revealing the importance of having an

284

insulation layer between the bulk water and evaporation surface to enhance the overall light-to-

285

vapor energy conversion efficiency.

286

78% under 0.82 sun, which is comparable to the efficiency (80-85% under one sun) of other

287

recently reported carbon-based evaporators with good insulation.5, 16-20 Some other biological

288

and engineered materials (e.g., carbonized mushroom, two-dimensional MXene) with good

289

photothermal properties and proper insulation also led to a relatively high efficiency (~80%).34, 35

290

However, when an effective insulation layer was absent, a much lower efficiency (50-64%) was

291

reported for GO,17 plasmonic material,12,

292

conversion efficiency in general increases with increasing light intensity. For example,

293

efficiencies as high as 90-94% were achieved by GO 16 and plasmonic material-based systems 12,

294

15

Our tree configuration with a GO leaf had an efficiency of

15

and other materials.36

Note that the energy

when subjected to a much higher light intensity (> 4 suns).

295

Additional characterization of the GO leaf in a tree configuration showed a positive

296

correlation between the evaporation rate and light intensity. As plotted in Figure 5C, the

297

evaporation rate increased approximately linearly with light intensity and nearly doubled as the

298

light intensity increased from 450 to 900 W/m2. Note that other environmental factors such as

299

humidity, temperature, and wind speed also likely affect the evaporation rate.37 Research on the

300

effects of these factors is warranted in the future but is beyond the scope of the present study.

301

FIGURE 5

302

Solar Desalination Performance. The GO leaf was tested in a tree configuration

303

under the 0.82-sun condition (825 W/m2) and at different salinity levels. It is observed in Figure

304

6A that the stabilized evaporation rate of the GO leaf was inversely proportional to water salinity.

13


Page 15 of 29


305

Specifically, the evaporation rate decreased from 2.0 LMH for fresh (i.e., zero-salinity) water to

306

0.71 LMH for water with an initial salinity of 7.0% NaCl, twice that of seawater. As salinity

307

further increased, the evaporation rate appeared to decrease much more slowly and reached ~0.5

308

LMH at a salinity level of 15 wt.% NaCl. The evaporation rate at each salinity typically

309

decreased initially and stabilized within the first hour, as demonstrated in Figure 6B using the

310

salinity level of 15% as an example. Therefore, compared with the thick accumulation of salt

311

crystals on the GO leaf, the initial formation of salt crystals, which took place within the pores

312

and grow heterogeneously at random locations on the surface, likely played an important role in

313

reducing the evaporation rate. In order to study the structure of salt crystals initially formed on

314

GO surface before it was fully covered by a thick crystal layer, we used SEM to observe the

315

crystal-free regions of the GO leaf with naked eyes after crystals started to accumulate in other

316

regions, using NaCl solutions with initial salinity levels of 1.75% (Figure 6C), 3.5% (Figure S7),

317

5.25% (Figure S7), and 7.0% (Figure 6D), respectively. As expected, an increase in salinity led

318

to more severe crystal formation and thus narrower open pores of the GO leaf, decreasing the

319

rates of water transport and evaporation (Figure 6A).

320

It is observed in Figure 6D that open pores still existed in the GO leaf even after it had

321

experienced significant crystal build-up at high salinity. According to Kelvin equation,38

322

evaporation would occur more rapidly on the convex/flat surface of salt crystals formed over the

323

GO leaf surface than on the concave water surface formed within the pores. We hypothesize that

324

such preferential evaporation helped the pores of the GO leaf to remain open as crystals kept

325

growing on the already-formed ones, thereby enabling water evaporation to continue despite salt

326

crystal accumulation on the leaf surface. Similar preferential sites for salt accumulation was also

327

observed in the process of water evaporation from porous media.39

14



Page 16 of 29

328

It is interesting to note that after the initial pore blockage the additional salt

329

accumulation on the GO leaf surface did not appear to further reduce the evaporation rate. As

330

shown in Figure 6B, the water evaporation vs. time curve has an almost constant slope during a

331

5-day test (except the first hour) at a very high salinity of 15 wt.% NaCl. The time-lapse

332

snapshots in Figure 6E demonstrate that crystals gradually grew on the GO leaf surface during

333

the 5-day test, with the overall thickness reaching more than 1 cm by day 5. A time-lapse video

334

documenting the 5-day test is available in the Supporting Information. In addition, the formation

335

of a thick crystal layer did not significantly decrease the light absorption efficiency of the GO

336

leaf; on the contrary, thermal images (Figure 6F) show that the surface temperature of the GO

337

leaf during the evaporation experiment using high-salinity (15%) water was actually higher than

338

that using deionized water (Figure 4D), indicating that a large portion of light was still able to

339

transmit through the salt crystals accumulated on the GO leaf. Note that the evaporation rate was

340

likely affected by a number of factors, including the surface temperature, pore size, effective

341

evaporation area, and capillary action within the leaf structure, some of which may have

342

conflicting effects on evaporation on the GO leaf.

343

GO leaf might quickly (say, within hours) reach a steady state and become the most limiting

344

factor during subsequent evaporation.

It is suspected that capillary action within the

Future work to fully understand such effects is needed.

345

Although the salt accumulation did not noticeably affect the water evaporation rate in the

346

present study, the salt build-up on the GO leaf surface could eventually damage the overall solar

347

desalination system due to, for example, the added weight. To resolve this issue, the accumulated

348

salt should be cleaned regularly during the evaporation operation — salt crystals were scraped

349

off from the GO leaf using a metal scoopula and then the GO leaf was soaked in deionized water

350

for 5 min (Figure S8A). In this way, the pristine state of the GO leaf was restored without

15


Page 17 of 29


351

apparent signs of physical damage or performance deterioration (Figure S8B). Note that the

352

accumulation of inorganic (e.g., gypsum) and organic (e.g., natural organic matter, protein and

353

other macromolecules) species on the GO leaf could also affect the evaporation performance.

354

Evaluation of such effects is necessary in the future toward further development of the present

355

solar desalination technology.

356

FIGURE 6

357

Outlook of Artificial Tree for Solar Desalination and Wastewater Treatment with

358

ZLD. An artificial tree system consisting of multiple synthetic GO leaves will be the next-

359

phase experimental configuration toward scaling up the present single-leaf device. We expect

360

that the multi-leaf configuration will make the solar desalination system more compact so as to

361

better withstand real-world environmental stressors. Besides, the multi-leaf configuration will

362

increase the so-called leaf area index (LAI), which is defined as the ratio of total one-sided leaf

363

area to canopy footprint area.40

364

efficient use of solar light by absorbing scattered/transmitted light and secondary irradiation, but

365

also enhance convective evaporation by increasing the available leaf surface area. In the

366

meantime, future research is warranted to optimize the structure and properties of the GO leaf for

367

maximum utilization of convective evaporation (in addition to direct solar evaporation) along

368

with the capillary force to take up and transport water. Eventually, water vapor generated by

369

synthetic leaves will be collected and condensed to produce clean water. Note that the latent heat

370

released from vapor condensation could be recovered and reused for evaporation, further

371

increasing the overall energy efficiency.

372

An artificial tree with a larger LAI will not only enable more

The direct crystallization of salt on synthetic leaves offers an unprecedented opportunity

16



Page 18 of 29

373

for brine disposal with ZLD. The unique capability of natural mangrove trees to predominantly

374

excrete NaCl crystals on leaf surface, which results in a buildup of magnesium and potassium

375

ions in leaves,27 suggests the possibility of salt separation and purification during crystallization.

376

In addition to salt excretion on synthetic leaves via water evaporation, salt exclusion at synthetic

377

roots made of semipermeable membranes can be implemented to enhance the overall

378

desalination performance, leading to a complete tree configuration. We expect that the artificial

379

tree system will be capable of treating high-salinity waters and recovering salts using sunlight as

380

the sole energy source. Considering the scale-up feasibility and low fabrication cost of the

381

synthetic GO leaf, the artificial tree system offers a great potential for important applications

382

such as off-grid, robust, and economical wastewater treatment and seawater desalination with

383

minimum environmental impacts.

384

385

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

386

Supporting Information.

387

(Figure S1); Comparison of the color and morphology of the filter paper substrate before and

388

after GO leaf synthesis (Figure S2); Folding and unfolding of the GO leaf to demonstrate its

389

material durability (Figure S3); XPS analysis of the GO leaf before and after sunlight irradiation

390

(Figure S4); Step-by-step assembly of the experimental setup for the tree configuration with a

391

GO leaf (Figure S5); Methods for calculating the evaporation efficiencies of the GO leaf in

392

floating and tree configurations, respectively; Evaporation performance of the GO leaf and the

393

control bulk water under dark conditions in floating and tree configurations, respectively (Figure

394

S6); Method for calculating the fate of solar energy irradiated on the evaporation surface; SEM

Comparison of the solar spectra of natural and simulated sunlights

17


Page 19 of 29


395

images of early-stage formation of salt crystals on the GO leaf surface at salinities of 3.5 and

396

5.25 wt.% NaCl, respectively (Figure S7); Reusability of the GO leaf after facile physical

397

cleaning (Figure S8). (PDF).

398

A time-lapse video documenting the salt crystal formation on the surface of the GO leaf in a tree

399

configuration, which was tested at a high salinity of 15 wt.% NaCl during a 5-day evaporation

400

experiment. (.mpg)

401

402

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

403

The material is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under

404

award no. CBET-1565452 and the U.S. Department of Energy under award no. DE-IA0000018.

405

Besides, CF acknowledges the support of the U.S. National Science Foundation Graduate

406

Research Fellowship (DGE 1106400), and BM is grateful for a Hellman Fellows fund. Work at

407

the Molecular Foundry was supported by the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences,

408

of the U.S. Department of Energy under award no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. However, the

409

opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the

410

sponsors. We also thank Dr. Zhongying Wang at the University of California, Berkeley for the

411

assistance in the GO leaf characterization.

412

REFERENCES

413 414 415 416

1. Elimelech, M.; Phillip, W. A., The future of seawater desalination: Energy, technology, and the environment. Science 2011, 333, (6043), 712-717. 2. Tong, T.; Elimelech, M., The global rise of zero liquid discharge for wastewater management: Drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environmental Science & Technology

18



417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462

Page 20 of 29

2016, 50, (13), 6846-6855. 3. McGinnis, R. L.; Hancock, N. T.; Nowosielski-Slepowron, M. S.; McGurgan, G. D., Pilot demonstration of the NH3/CO2 forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines. Desalination 2013, 312, 67-74. 4. Al-Obaidani, S.; Curcio, E.; Macedonio, F.; Di Profio, G.; Al-Hinai, H.; Drioli, E., Potential of membrane distillation in seawater desalination: Thermal efficiency, sensitivity study and cost estimation. Journal of Membrane Science 2008, 323, (1), 85-98. 5. Ito, Y.; Tanabe, Y.; Han, J.; Fujita, T.; Tanigaki, K.; Chen, M., Multifunctional porous graphene for high-efficiency steam generation by heat localization. Advanced Materials 2015, 27, (29), 4302-4307. 6. Jiang, Q.; Tian, L.; Liu, K.-K.; Tadepalli, S.; Raliya, R.; Biswas, P.; Naik, R. R.; Singamaneni, S., Bilayered biofoam for highly efficient solar steam generation. Advanced Materials 2016, 28, (42), 9400-9407. 7. Wang, Z. H.; Liu, Y. M.; Tao, P.; Shen, Q. C.; Yi, N.; Zhang, F. Y.; Liu, Q. L.; Song, C. Y.; Zhang, D.; Shang, W.; Deng, T., Bio-inspired evaporation through plasmonic film of nanoparticles at the air-water interface. Small 2014, 10, (16), 3234-3239. 8. Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, D.; Cao, M.; Jiang, L., Floatable, self-cleaning, and carbon-blackbased superhydrophobic gauze for the solar evaporation enhancement at the air–water interface. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2015, 7, (24), 13645-13652. 9. Chang, C.; Yang, C.; Liu, Y. M.; Tao, P.; Song, C. Y.; Shang, W.; Wu, J. B.; Deng, T., Efficient solar-thermal energy harvest driven by interfacial plasmonic heating-assisted evaporation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2016, 8, (35), 23412-23418. 10. Liu, Y.; Lou, J. W.; Ni, M. T.; Song, C. Y.; Wu, J. B.; Dasgupta, N. P.; Tao, P.; Shang, W.; Deng, T., Bioinspired bifunctional membrane for efficient clean water generation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2016, 8, (1), 772-779. 11. Liu, Y. M.; Chen, J. W.; Guo, D. W.; Cao, M. Y.; Jiang, L., Floatable, self-cleaning, and carbon-black-based superhydrophobic gauze for the solar evaporation enhancement at the airwater interface. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2015, 7, (24), 13645-13652. 12. Zhou, L.; Tan, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, W.; Yuan, Y.; Cai, W.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, J., 3D self-assembly of aluminium nanoparticles for plasmon-enhanced solar desalination. Nat Photon 2016, 10, (6), 393-398. 13. Yuan, N.; Caixia, K.; Qi, G.; Jingjing, W.; Haiying, X.; Changshun, W., Heat generation and stability of a plasmonic nanogold system. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2016, 49, (5), 055302. 14. Bae, K.; Kang, G.; Cho, S. K.; Park, W.; Kim, K.; Padilla, W. J., Flexible thin-film black gold membranes with ultrabroadband plasmonic nanofocusing for efficient solar vapour generation. Nat Commun 2015, 6, 10103. 15. Zhou, L.; Tan, Y.; Ji, D.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, P.; Xu, J.; Gan, Q.; Yu, Z.; Zhu, J., Selfassembly of highly efficient, broadband plasmonic absorbers for solar steam generation. Sci Adv 2016, 2, (4), e1501227. 16. Zhang, P.; Li, J.; Lv, L.; Zhao, Y.; Qu, L., Vertically aligned graphene sheets membrane for highly efficient solar thermal generation of clean water. ACS Nano 2017. 17. Li, X.; Xu, W.; Tang, M.; Zhou, L.; Zhu, B.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, J., Graphene oxide-based efficient and scalable solar desalination under one sun with a confined 2D water path. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016, 113, (49), 13953-13958. 18. Hu, X.; Xu, W.; Zhou, L.; Tan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, J., Tailoring graphene oxide-

19


Page 21 of 29

463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508


based aerogels for efficient solar steam generation under one sun. Advanced Materials 2017, 29, (5), 1604031. 19. Li, X.; Lin, R.; Ni, G.; Xu, N.; Hu, X.; Zhu, B.; Lv, G.; Li, J.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, J., Threedimensional artificial transpiration for efficient solar waste-water treatment. National Science Review 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx051. 20. Ghasemi, H.; Ni, G.; Marconnet, A. M.; Loomis, J.; Yerci, S.; Miljkovic, N.; Chen, G., Solar steam generation by heat localization. Nat Commun 2014, 5, 4449. 21. Zheng, S.; Tu, Q.; Urban, J. J.; Li, S.; Mi, B., Swelling of graphene oxide membranes in aqueous solution: Characterization of interlayer spacing and insight into water transport mechanisms. ACS Nano 2017, 11, (6), 6440-6450. 22. Mi, B., Graphene oxide membranes for ionic and molecular sieving. Science 2014, 343, (6172), 740–742. 23. Huang, H.; Song, Z.; Wei, N.; Shi, L.; Mao, Y.; Ying, Y.; Sun, L.; Xu, Z.; Peng, X., Ultrafast viscous water flow through nanostrand-channelled graphene oxide membranes. Nat Commun 2013, 4, 2979. 24. Hu, M.; Mi, B., Layer-by-layer assembly of graphene oxide membranes via electrostatic interaction. Journal of Membrane Science 2014, 469, 80-87. 25. Kim, K.; Seo, E.; Chang, S. K.; Park, T. J.; Lee, S. J., Novel water filtration of saline water in the outermost layer of mangrove roots. Scientific Reports 2016, 6. 26. Lovelock, C. E.; Feller, I. C., Photosynthetic performance and resource utilization of two mangrove species coexisting in a hypersaline scrub forest. Oecologia 2003, 134, (4), 455-462. 27. Atkinson, M.; Findlay, G.; Hope, A.; Pitman, M.; DW Saddler, H.; West, K., Salt regulation in the mangroves rhizophora mucronata lam and aegialitis annulata rbr. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 1967, 20, (3), 589-600. 28. Hummers, W. S.; Offeman, R. E., Preparation of graphitic oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1958, 80, (6), 1339-1339. 29. Marcano, D. C.; Kosynkin, D. V.; Berlin, J. M.; Sinitskii, A.; Sun, Z. Z.; Slesarev, A.; Alemany, L. B.; Lu, W.; Tour, J. M., Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2010, 4, (8), 4806-4814. 30. Ye, S. B.; Feng, J. C.; Wu, P. Y., Highly elastic graphene oxide-epoxy composite aerogels via simple freeze-drying and subsequent routine curing. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2013, 1, (10), 3495-3502. 31. Lamb, M.; Koch, G. W.; Morgan, E. R.; Shafer, M. W., A synthetic leaf: The biomimetic potential of graphene oxide. Proc. of SPIE 2015, 9429, 942915-1-10. 32. Sillett, S. C.; Van Pelt, R.; Carroll, A. L.; Kramer, R. D.; Ambrose, A. R.; Trask, D. A., How do tree structure and old age affect growth potential of california redwoods? Ecological Monographs 2015, 85, (2), 181-212. 33. Li, J.-m.; Liu, C.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, K.-p.; Ke, X.; Li, C.-y.; Wang, L.-d., A bio-inspired micropump based on stomatal transpiration in plants. Lab on a Chip 2011, 11, (16), 2785-2789. 34. Xu, N.; Hu, X.; Xu, W.; Li, X.; Zhou, L.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, J., Mushrooms as efficient solar steam-generation devices. Advanced Materials 2017, 29, (28), 1606762-n/a. 35. Li, R.; Zhang, L.; Shi, L.; Wang, P., Mxene Ti3C2: An effective 2D light-to-heat conversion material. ACS Nano 2017, 11, (4), 3752-3759. 36. Zhang, L.; Tang, B.; Wu, J.; Li, R.; Wang, P., Hydrophobic light-to-heat conversion membranes with self-healing ability for interfacial solar heating. Advanced Materials 2015, 27, (33), 4889-4894.

20



509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518

37. Kuiper, P. J. C., The effects of environmental factors on the transpiration of leaves, with special reference to stomatal light response. H. Veenman & Zonen: 1961. 38. Thomson, W., On the equilibrium of vapour at a curved surface of liquid. Philosophical Magazine 1871, 4(42), (282), 448-452. 39. Rad, M. N.; Shokri, N.; Keshmiri, A.; Withers, P. J., Effects of grain and pore size on salt precipitation during evaporation from porous media. Transport in Porous Media 2015, 110, (2), 281-294. 40. Breda, N., Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: A review of methods, instruments and current controversies. Journal of Experimental Botany 2003, 54, 2403-2417.

519

520

21


Page 22 of 29

Page 23 of 29

521 522


T.O.C.

523

22



524

525 526 527 528

Figure 1. Schematic illustration for the fabrication of synthetic GO leaf.

23


Page 24 of 29

Page 25 of 29


529

530 531 532 533

Figure 2. Solar evaporation through the synthetic GO leaf to mimic water transpiration in natural trees.

24



Page 26 of 29

534 A

B

100 GO Leaf

1204 1566

Absorption

Absorption (%)

80 60 40

1645

Filter Paper

20

GO Leaf

1724

Filter Paper

0 500

535

1000 1500 2000 Wavelength (nm)

2500

500

1000

1500 2000 2500 Wavenumber (cm-1)

3000

536 537 538 539 540

Figure 3. Characterization of the synthetic GO leaf. (A) Absorption spectra and (B) FTIR spectra of the filter paper substrate and GO leaf; SEM images with different magnifications of (C and D) the surface morphology and (E and F) cross section of the GO leaf.

541 542 543

25


Page 27 of 29

544 545 546 547


Figure 4. Temperature evolution during water evaporation in different configurations: (A) bulk water as a control, (B) GO leaf floating on water surface, (C) tree configuration without GO leaf as a control, and (D) tree configuration with GO leaf.

548

26



Page 28 of 29

549

A

Light Intensity = 825 W/m2 (0.82 sun)

B

4

3

Tree with GO leaf 2.0 LMH

3

Floating GO 1.1 LMH

2

No GO

0.88 LMH

1 Bulk evaporation 0.70 LMH

0 0

20

40

550

B

60 80 Time (min)

Floating GO

72%

1

500

600 700 800 900 Light Intensity (W/m2)

Tree without GO

36%

1000

Tree with GO Leaf

83% 12%

Evaporation Loss as heat Loss as light

551 552 553 554 555 556

2

0 400

100

Bulk Evaporation

Evaporation Rate (L/m2/h)

Water Evaporation (L/m2)

GO Leaf in Tree Configuration

78%

Light reflection 10% 8%

20%

54%

6%

10%

11%

Figure 5. Solar evaporation enhanced by the GO leaf: (A) the water evaporation, with the slope denoting the evaporation rate in L/m2/h (LMH), for each configuration; (B) the fate of solar energy for each configuration; (C) the effect of light intensity on the evaporation rate of the GO leaf in the tree configuration.

27



Evaporation Rate (L/m2/h)

A

3 Light Intensity = 825 W/m2 (0.82 sun)

2

Seawater

1

B

70

0.8

Water Evaporation (L/m2)

Page 29 of 29

60

0.6

50

0.4 0.2

40 0.0

30

0

10

20 30 40 50 Time (Minutes)

60

0.5 L/m2/h

20 10 Salinity = 15 wt.% NaCl 0

0 0

557

558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565

2

4 6 8 10 12 14 Water Salinity (wt.% NaCl)

0

16

1

2 3 Time (Days)

4

5

Figure 6. Solar desalination by the GO leaf in a tree configuration. (A) Effect of water salinity on the stabilized evaporation rate; (B) 5-day evaporation performance of the GO leaf using 15 wt.% NaCl solution; (C and D) SEM images of the GO leaf surface after salt crystallization occurred with 1.75 and 7 wt.% NaCl solutions respectively ; (E) Time-lapse snapshots of salt crystal formation on the GO leaf surface during a 5-day evaporation experiment using 15 wt.% NaCl solution; and (F) thermal images revealing the effect of salt accumulation over the GO leaf surface on temperature evolution, using 15 wt.% NaCl solution.

28


Synthetic Graphene Oxide Leaf for Solar Desalination with Zero

Recommend Documents