Subscriber access provided by University of Sunderland
Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions
Toxicokinetics and metabolism of 3-monochloropropane 1,2-diol (3-MCPD) dipalmitate in Sprague Dawley rats Guoren Huang, Boyan Gao, Jinli Xue, Zhihong Cheng, Xiangjun Sun, Yaqiong Zhang, and Liangli (Lucy) Yu J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05422 • Publication Date (Web): 10 Oct 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 14, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Toxicokinetics and metabolism of 3-monochloropropane 1,2-diol (3-MCPD) dipalmitate in Sprague Dawley rats Guoren Huang1, 2, Boyan Gao1, 2*, Jinli Xue2, Zhihong Cheng3, Xiangjun Sun2, Yaqiong Zhang2, Liangli (Lucy) Yu4*
1
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing
Technology & Business University (BTBU), Beijing 100048, China 2
Institute of Food and Nutraceutical Science, School of Agriculture & Biology, Shanghai Jiao
Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China 3 Department
of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203,
China. 4
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, 0112 Skinner Building,
College Park, MD 20742, USA
* Contact Information of the Corresponding Author: Liangli (Lucy) Yu, Tel: 301-0405-0761, Fax: 301-314-3313, Email:
[email protected]; Correspondence may also be directed to Boyan Gao, Tel: 86-3420-4538, Email:
[email protected] ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Abstract
2
Fatty acid esters of 3-monochloropropane 1,2-diol (3-MCPD) are a group of
3
processing-induced toxicants. To better clarify their possible toxicological effects and
4
mechanisms, it is important to investigate their absorption, distribution, metabolism and
5
excretion. In this study, the kinetic parameters of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in Sprague Dawley (SD)
6
rat plasma were determined using ultraperformance liquid chromatography-triple
7
quadrupole-mass spectroscopy (UPLC-TQS-MS). 3-MCPD dipalmitate was absorbed in rats
8
with a Cmax of 135.00 ng/mL, T1/2 of 3.87 h, Tmax of 2.5 h, MRT of 5.08 h, CL of 3.50 L/h/g, Vd
9
of 21.34 L/g, and AUC0-∞ of 458.47 hng/mL. A total of 17 metabolites were identified, and 16 of
10
that were reported for the first time. Furthermore, these metabolites were examined for their
11
presences in the liver, kidney, testis, brain, spleen, thymus, intestine, plasma, faeces and urine
12
samples 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after oral administration of 3-MCPD dipalmitate using a
13
Metabolynx software.
14 15
Key words: 3-MCPD dipalmitate; toxicokinetics; UPLC-MS; absorption, distribution,
16
metabolism and excretion (ADME).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 37
Page 3 of 37
17 18
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Introduction The fatty acid esters of 3-monochloropropane 1,2-diol (3-MCPD esters) are a group of food
19
contaminants formed during food processing in a range of 0.14-27 mg/kg in many food
20
categories and food ingredients, especially in refined edible oils.1-5 3-MCPD esters have become
21
a real food safety concern due to their toxicities.6-9 Kidney is the primary target organ of
22
3-MCPD esters.6-10 3-MCPD esters caused kidney tubular necrosis and epididymis epithelial
23
apoptosis at doses of 22.5-360 μmol/kg BW/day in F344 rats in a 13-week toxicological study.7
24
3-MCPD esters also induced kidney tubular cell apoptosis in a single dose of 1000 mg/kg BW in
25
Sprague Dawley (SD) rats.11 Moreover, 3-MCPD dipalmitate at a concentration of 9.78-156.75
26
mg/kg BW/day was able to induce tubular and testicular toxicities in Wistar rats in a 90-day
27
toxicological study.10 In addition, 3-MCPD dipalmitate, 3-MCPD distearate, 3-MCPD dioleate,
28
and 3-MCPD dilinoleate induced lipid metabolism disorders in C57BL/6J mice at doses of 3, 6
29
and 11 mg/kg BW/day.12 Recently, Liu and colleagues reported that 3-MCPD esters could
30
induce acute toxicity in brain, thymus and lung in Swiss mice at a treatment level of 4162 mg/kg
31
BW.9
32
The toxicity of 3-MCPD esters was partly attributed to 3-MCPD, which might be released
33
from 3-MCPD esters in Caco-2 cells, human and Wistar rats.13-17 In addition, Seefelder and
34
colleagues reported that 3-MCPD monoesters were effectively hydrolyzed to free 3-MCPD by
35
lipase from porcine pancreas in vitro.18 Moreover, the metabolic rate of 3-MCPD diesters to
36
3-MCPD was much slower compared with that of monoesters in vitro.13, 18 Abraham and others 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
37
reported that the diester form of 3-MCPD had 86% bioavailability compared with free 3-MCPD
38
in Wistar rats at a single dose of 53.2 mg/kg BW,14 while Barocelli and others demonstrated that
39
the bioavailability of 3-MCPD dipalmitate was 70% of the free 3-MCPD in Wistar rats a dose of
40
156.7 mg/kg BW under the experimental conditions.10 Barocelli et al. also reported that free
41
3-MCPD and its metabolites 2,3-dihydroxypropyl mercapturic acid (DHPMA) and β-chlorolactic
42
acid were the metabolites of 3-MCPD dipalmitate.10 However, these previous studies primarily
43
focused on free 3-MCPD, but not the other possible metabolites of 3-MCPD esters in vivo. In
44
addition, the bioavailability results could not explain the difference in the toxic effects between
45
3-MCPD monoester and diester in Swiss mice or SD rats on an equimolar basis.6, 9, 11 Recently,
46
Gao and others reported that 8 metabolites of 3-MCPD 1-palmitate after a single oral dose of 400
47
mg/kg BW were found in rats, including 3-MCPD, sulfonated 3-MCPD, acetylated 3-MCPD,
48
glucuronidated 3-MCPD, and 3-MCPD bonded with different amino acids, and the major
49
excretion of 3-MCPD 1-palmitate was suggested through urine.19 It is interesting whether and
50
how 3-MCPD diesters can be absorbed, distributed to different tissues and organs, metabolized
51
and excreted.
52
The present study was conducted to investigate the toxicokinetics of 3-MCPD dipalmitate at
53
a dose of 1600 mg/kg, and to characterize 3-MCPD dipalmitate metabolites and their distribution
54
in liver, kidney, testis, spleen, intestine, thymus, brain tissues as well as in faecal and urine
55
samples with two animal feeding studies in SD rats. A possible metabolism pathway(s) in SD rat
56
model was also suggested. The treatment dose was selected as a possible greatest dose based on 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 37
Page 5 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
57
the preliminary experiments and previous studies, so that more metabolites could reach their
58
limit of detection (LOD) of the analytical method and could be detectable under the experimental
59
conditions. This is the first study on the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion
60
(ADME) of 3-MCPD dipalmitate. The results may contribute to overall knowledge of the organ
61
specific toxicities of 3-MCPD diesters.
62
Materials and Methods
63
Chemicals and reagents. 1,2-Bis-palmitoyl-3-chloropropanediol (3-MCPD dipalmitate),
64
1-Palmitoyl-3-chloropropanediol (3-MCPD 1-palmitate) and 2-Palmitoyl-3-chloropropanediol
65
(3-MCPD 2-palmitate) were synthesized in the lab. And their purity was above 98% tested by
66
ultraperformance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time of flight-mass spectroscopy
67
(UPLC-QTOF-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The standard 3-MCPD dipalmitate
68
and the deuterated internal standard rac 1,2-Bis-palmitoyl-3-chloropropanediol-d5 (3-MCPD
69
d5-dipalmitate) were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (Ontario, Canada). Liquid
70
chromatography mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) grade isopropanol and sodium acetate were
71
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). LC-MS grade methanol was purchased from
72
CNW Technologies (Düsseldorf, Germany). LC-MS grade water was obtained from a Milli-Q 10
73
ultra-pure water system (Billerica, USA). All the other chemical reagents were analytical grade,
74
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA) and used without further purification.
75 76
Animals, diet and housing conditions. Male SD rats (160 ± 20 g, 6-8 weeks old) were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China). The rats were 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
77
maintained in a temperature controlled room maintained on a 12 h light/dark cycle, and were
78
allowed free access to drinking water and standard diet (including approximately 5% clued oil,
79
XIETONG, Jiangsu, China).19, 20 The animals were acclimatized to the facilities for a week, and
80
then fasted with free access to water for 12 h prior to experiment. All procedures involving
81
animal uses were conducted in accordance with the Animal Care and Welfare Committee of the
82
Laboratory Animal Center of Shanghai Jiao Tong University with a certification number of
83
A2015024.
84
Animal treatment and sample collection. 3-MCPD dipalmitate was orally administrated
85
to rats. After 4 hours, the water and food were fed ad libitum. Seventy-two SD rats were
86
separated into 12 groups randomly, and each group had six rats. Two groups were used for
87
toxicokinetics analysis. After administration of 3-MCPD dipalmitate (test group) or extra virgin
88
olive oil free of 3 MCPD esters (control group), blood samples were collected in heparinized
89
Eppendorf tube via the oculi chorioidea vein before dosing and subsequently at sixteen time
90
points (0, 0.167, 0.33, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h).19, 21
91
The rest ten groups of rats were used for the metabolic studies of 3-MCPD dipalmitate.
92
Briefly, five groups were kept in metabolic cages, and the SD rats were anaesthetized with CO2
93
and decapitated to collect the liver, kidney, testis, spleen, intestine, thymus and brain at 2, 6, 12,
94
24 and 48 hours after oral administration of 3-MCPD dipalmitate. The faeces and urine samples
95
were collected in metabolic cages at different time points. For instance, urine samples at 12
96
hours represented the urine collected between 10 and 12 hours. Another five groups were set as 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 37
Page 7 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
97
control groups, oral administration of equal amount of extra virgin olive oil free of 3-MCPD
98
esters, and sacrificed at similar five time points as the five test groups. All biological samples
99
except blood samples were rapidly frozen at -80 °C until analysis.
100
Preparation of animal samples. The animal samples were prepared according to
101
previously reported protocols.19 Briefly, blood samples were centrifuged, and the supernatant
102
plasma was collected and rapidly frozen at -80 °C until assay. 300 µL of acetonitrile was added
103
to each 100 µL of plasma sample, and followed by vortexing and centrifugation at 9391 g for 10
104
minutes at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred into a UPLC vial. 0.1 g of each liver, kidney,
105
testis, spleen, intestine, thymus, or brain tissue sample was homogenized with 900 μL ice-cold
106
saline at 4 °C. After 900 μL acetonitrile was added to 300 µL of the tissue homogenate, each
107
mixture was vortexed and centrifuged at 9391 g at 4 °C for 10 min, and the supernatant was
108
collected and transferred to an UPLC vial. In addition, water-saturated ethyl acetate was used to
109
extract urine sample at a solvent to urine ratio of 5/1 (v/v), and the solvent was removed from the
110
supernatant by evaporating using a nitrogen evaporator at ambient temperature. The residue was
111
re-dissolved with methanol. 0.1 g of the freeze-dried faeces sample was extracted by 1.5 mL
112
ethyl acetate for two times, and the solvent was removed from the supernatant using a nitrogen
113
evaporator after centrifugation. The residue was re-dissolved with methanol.
114
UPLC-MS analyses. A Waters Acuity UPLC-TQS-MS (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with
115
a Waters Phenyl column (2.1 mm i.d. × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) was selected to quantify 3-MCPD
116
dipalmitate levels in rat plasma. The mobile phase consisted of (A) water/methanol (9:1, v/v) 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
117
with 1 mg/L NaOAc, and (B) methanol/ isopropanol (4:1, v/v) with 1 mg/L NaOAc, using the
118
elution gradient beginning with 35% phase B, changed linearly to 95% B in 3 min and
119
maintained for 2 min, and returned to its initial conditions for 1 min to re-equilibrate the column
120
for the next injection. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min with an injection volume of 2 μL. The MS
121
detector conditions were: capillary voltage 3.50 kV; sampling cone voltage 35 V; extraction cone
122
voltage 4.0 V; source temperature 120 °C; and desolvation temperature was 450 °C. The cone
123
gas flow rate was 150 L/h and the desolvation gas was 1000 L/h. An ion pair with a precursor ion
124
at m/z 609.4627 ([M+Na]+) and a product ion at m/z 551.5026 for 3-MCPD dipalmitate, and m/z
125
371.2329 ([M+Na]+) and a product ion at m/z 313.2747 for 3-MCPD 1-palmitate and 3-MCPD
126
2-palmitate were selected to create a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) method with the
127
collision energy of 35 eV in ESI positive mode.
128
A Waters Acuity UPLC-Xevo G2-QTOF-MS system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was
129
selected for metabolite identification with a Waters Phenyl column (2.1 mm i.d. × 100 mm, 1.7
130
μm). The mobile phase consisted of (A) water/methanol (9:1, v/v)) with 1 mg/L NaOAc, and (B)
131
methanol/ isopropanol (4:1, v/v) with 1 mg/L NaOAc, and using the elution gradient started with
132
0% phase B, changed linearly to 35% B in 4 min, then changed linearly to 95% B in another 4
133
min and maintained for 2 min, and returned to its initial conditions and kept for 2 min to
134
re-equilibrate the column for the next injection. For MS detector conditions, capillary voltage
135
3.00 kV; sampling cone voltage 35 V; extraction cone voltage 4.0 V; source temperature 120 °C;
136
and desolvation temperature 450 °C. The cone gas flow rate was 150 L/h and the desolvation gas 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 37
Page 9 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
137
was 800 L/h. A MSE method was used with mass range from 50 to 1200 m/z in both ESI positive
138
and ESI negative mode, scan time was 0.3 s and the ramp collision energy was 20-35 eV.
139
The Waters Acquity Ultra Performance Convergence Chromatography™ (UPCC) equipped
140
with TQS-MS was used to separate 3-MCPD 1-palmitate and 3-MCPD 2-palmitate. The
141
qualitative analysis was performed at 50 °C using an Acquity UPCC HSS C18 SB column (100
142
mm × 3.0 mm i.d.; 1.8μm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The elution gradient (solvent A, CO2;
143
solvent B, isopropanol: acetonitrile at 1:1, v/v) was started at 0.2% B; increased via linear
144
gradient to 20% B at 4 min, and maintained for 1 min, and returned to its initial conditions for 1
145
min. The back pressure was set at 1600 psi. The flow rate was 1.4 mL/min and the injection
146
volume was 2.0 μL. MS detector conditions were same as UPLC-TQS-MS.
147
Method development and validation. Current UPLC conditions and MS parameters were
148
validated as described in a previous study.19 Briefly, different mobile phases and MS parameters
149
were tested in the UPLC-MS system to select the appropriate mobile phase and MS method.
150
3-MCPD d5-dipalmitate was used as the internal standard. And the LOD and limit of
151
quantification (LOQ), relative standard deviation (RSD), standard curve and linear range, and
152
recovery were validated as described by Gao and others .19 The LOD and LOQ in this study were
153
0.3 ng/mL and 1 ng/mL of 3-MCPD dipalmitate, respectively. The RSD was 1.82-4.07%. The
154
calibration curve of the 3-MCPD dipalmitate was linear in the range of 10-1000 ng/mL and the
155
correlation coefficient was 0.9994. The recovery of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in plasma samples was
156
93.00 to 109.66%. 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
157
GC-MS analyses. Free 3-MCPD was identified by a modified DGF method with GC-MS.
158
Brief, approx. 0.1 g tissue samples with 0.5 mL t-butyl methyl ether (tBME)/ethyl acetate (4:1,
159
v/v) were homogenize at 4 °C, and kept in an ultrasonic bath at 45 °C (starting temperature) for
160
15 min to remove glycidol. After adding 3 mL of hexane and 3 mL of saturated sodium sulfate,
161
the organic phase was removed with a pipette and discarded. After the addition of another 3 mL
162
hexane the mixture was shaken carefully. After the separation of the phases the upper hexane
163
phase was completely withdrawn with a pipette and discarded. 500 μL of the derivatization
164
reagent (Phenylboronic acid) was added into the aqueous phase, and reacted at 80 °C for 20
165
minutes. After cooling to ambient temperature, the 3-MCPD derivatives were extracted with 3
166
mL hexane for GC-MS analysis. GC-MS (7890A-5975C, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara,
167
USA) instrument with a DB-5MS(30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm, Agilent Technologies, Santa
168
Clara, USA) was used with the following settings: column temperature, 270 °C (1 min hold),
169
20 °C/min to 300 °C and hold for 5 min; carrier gas, He; constant linear velocity, 37 cm/s; inlet
170
temperature, 300 °C; injection mode, splitless; and injection volume, 1 μL. MS was operated in
171
the EI mode (70 eV, 60 μA) with the following settings: ion source temperature, 280 °C; mode,
172
SIM; monitoring ions, m/z 196, 147, 91 for 3-MCPD.26
173
Data and statistical analyses. Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The
174
kinetics of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in SD rat plasma was analyzed using Phoenix WinNonlin
175
software for Windows (version 6.4, Pharsight, Princeton, NJ). Toxicokinetics parameters
176
including peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), elimination half-life 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 37
Page 11 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
177
(T1/2), mean residence time (MRT) were obtained directly from the plasma -time data. The
178
clearance rate (CL), volume of distribution (Vd) and total area under the plasma
179
concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) were calculated using Phoenix WinNonlin software based on
180
the trapezoidal rule.
181
Results and discussion
182
Kinetics of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in rats. The toxicokinetics parameters including Cmax,
183
Tmax, T1/2, MRT, CL, Vd and AUC0-∞ are reported in Table 1. 3-MCPD dipalmitate was detected
184
in the plasma of SD rats at 20 min (data not shown) and reached Cmax of 135.00 ng/mL at about
185
2.5 h (Tmax) after a single oral gavage of 1600 mg/kg 3-MCPD dipalmitate. The Tmax was longer
186
than that for free 3-MCPD of 30 min14 and the Tmax of 1.67 h for 3-MCPD 1-palmitate.19 In the
187
present study, the T1/2, MRT, CL and Vd were 3.87 h, 5.08 h, 3.50 L/h/g and 21.34 L/g,
188
respectively. The average AUC0-∞ for 3-MCPD dipalmitate in SD rat plasma was 458.47
189
hng/mL. These data suggested that 3-MCPD dipalmitate could be absorbed in body circulation
190
as its diester form, which was supported by the observation in a previous study that 3-MCPD
191
dipalmitate was detected in the blood of F344 rats 20 and a previous report that 3-MCPD
192
dipalmitate was detected in human breast milk.22 In the study using F344 rats, a one-time-point
193
absorption of 3-MCPD dipalmitate at 30 min was reported at 0.06 nmol/mL (~35 ng/mL) after
194
treated with 360 μmol/kg BW 3-MCPD dipalmitate, which was about 1/4 of the Cmax value
195
compared with that from the present study.20 In contrast, two previous studies did not detect
196
original form of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in the plasma samples of Wistar rats at doses of 156.75 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
197
mg/kg BW and 53.2 mg/kg BW of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in 24 h after oral intake.10, 14 The
198
differences in 3-MCPD dipalmitate absorption may be partially explained by the animal species,
199
body weight and age of the animals, dose of 3-MCPD dipalmitate, and sample analysis
200
techniques. Additional studies are needed to further investigate the absorption of 3-MCPD
201
diesters in more experimental animal models and using diesters with different fatty acids.
202
It needs to be pointed out that the treatment dose of the present study is much greater than
203
the level of 3-MCPD esters that people may possibly obtain from food samples. It also needs to
204
realize that there is no information available on whether 3-MCPD esters might be accumulative
205
in human and animal bodies. The purpose of the present study was to investigate possible
206
absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of 3-MCPD esters. A relatively greater
207
concentration used in the study could provide more information about the potential metabolites
208
of 3-MCPD dipalmitate as well as the metabolic parameters in this animal model.
209
Fragmentation patterns of 3-MCPD esters. The fragmentation patterns of synthetic
210
standard 3-MCPD dipalmitate, 3-MCPD 1-palmitate and 3-MCPD 2-palmitate were examined
211
and used as references for identifying the 3-MCPD esters and their metabolites in the plasma and
212
tissue samples. Under positive ESI mode, 3-MCPD dipalmitate formed a [M+Na]+ ion at m/z
213
609.4627. The high collision energy mass spectrum showed characteristic product ions at m/z
214
551 and 573 due to the neutral loss of an HCl unit with or without a Na+ ion (Supplementary
215
Figure S1A). Both 3-MCPD 1-palmitate and 3-MCPD 2-palmitate have protonated molecule ion
216
[M+Na]+ at m/z 371.2329, and could yield a product ion at m/z 313 due to the neutral loss of an 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 37
Page 13 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
217
HCl unit with a Na+ ion (Supplementary Figure S1B, C). To separate 3-MCPD 1-palmitate
218
from 3-MCPD 2-palmitate, a UPCC-TQS-MS method was developed and utilized. UPCC is a
219
supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) which is suitable for non- and low-polarity compound
220
separation.23, 24 As shown in Supplementary Figure S2, 3-MCPD 1-palmitate and 3-MCPD
221
2-palmitate were successfully separated from each other with retention time of 2.62 min and 3.06
222
min, respectively. Taken together, the information about these fragmentation patterns was
223
helpful in characterizing and identifying the prototype and major metabolites of 3-MCPD
224
dipalmitate in vivo.
225
Identification of 3-MCPD dipalmitate metabolites. A total of 17 metabolites of 3-MCPD
226
dipalmitate were identified or tentatively identified in the SD rat plasma, urine, faeces, liver,
227
kidney, testis, spleen, intestine, thymus and brain samples collected at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after
228
3-MCPD dipalmitate administration based on their accurate formula masses and fragment ion
229
patterns using Waters MetaboLynx software. Metabolites included 3-MCPD 2-palmitate (M1),
230
glycidol palmitate (M2), 3-MCPD palmitoleate-palmitate (M3), 3-MCPD palmitate-sterate (M4),
231
3-MCPD palmitate-oleate (M5), 3-MCPD palmitate-linoleate (M6), 3-MCPD
232
palmitate-arachidonate (M7), 3-MCPD sterate (M8), 3-MCPD oleate (M9), 3-MCPD linoleate
233
(M10), 3-MCPD arachidonate (M11), glucuronidated 3-MCPD 2-palmitate (M12), glutathione
234
conjugate of monopalmitate (M13), palmitic acid (M14), sulfonated dipalmitate (M15),
235
glucuronided 3-MCPD (M16) and 3-MCPD (M17), along with 3-MCPD dipalmitate (Figure 1).
236
M17 was identified by GC-MS method, whereas the other metabolites and 3-MCPD dipalmitate 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
237
were identified based on UPLC-QTOF-MS analysis. It needs to point out that this study did not
238
quantify these metabolites in plasma or tissue samples. The chemical formulas, accurate masses,
239
retention time and mass fragments are summarized in Table 2 and Supplementary Figure
240
S3-S7.
241
Metabolite M1 (Figure 2) was selected as an example to demonstrate how these metabolites
242
were identified. M1 had a protonated molecule [M+Na]+ at m/z 371.2329 (Table 2, Figure 3A).
243
The major fragment of M1 under a stronger collision energy was obtained at m/z 313.2730
244
(Table 2, Figure 3B), 238 Da less than that of 3-MCPD dipalmitate (M0) (Supplementary
245
Figure S1A), indicating a possible loss of palmitic acid. UPCC-MS was employed to further
246
reveal the cleavage position of the palmitic acid. By comparing the UPCC-MS characteristic
247
spectra of M1 with the synthetic standard 3-MCPD 1-palmitate and 3-MCPD 2-palmitate, the
248
metabolite M1 in the liver and intestine with a retention time of 3.06 min was identified as
249
3-MCPD 2-palmitate (Supplementary Figure S2). No 3-MCPD 1-palmitate was detected in
250
rats’ tissues or plasma. These data suggested that sn-1 palmitic acid of 3-MCPD dipalmitate was
251
hydrolyzed possibly with a pancreatic lipase to generate a sn-2 3-MCPD monoester (M1) that
252
was absorbed into circulation system.17, 18 Due to the lack of standards, the fatty acid sn-
253
locations in the M3-M11 3-MCPD esters could not be identified, and the possible structures of
254
M3-M11 are provided in the dashed frames in Figure 1.
255 256
Glycidyl ester was identified as a metabolite of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in SD rat (Table 2). This observation was supported by a previous report that glycidol was detected in the serum of 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 37
Page 15 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
257
the F344 rats given 3-MCPD dipalmitate or 3-MCPD dioleate20. Interestingly, diesters of
258
3-MCPD were detected with one of the two palmitic acids substituted by other fatty acids (Table
259
2). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the transesterification of 3-MCPD
260
diesters in an animal model. Together, these results supported the previous suggestions that
261
3-MCPD diesters could be hydrolyzed at the sn-1 position firstly to a 3-MCPD 2-monoester, and
262
form a new 3-MCPD diesters catalyzed by enzyme(s) such as an esterase or lipase, for instance
263
monoacylglycerol acyltransferase or glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase.13, 17, 18, 25 Gao and
264
colleagues reported that 3-MCPD 1-palmitate was metabolized through acetylation,
265
glucuronidation and sulfonation in SD rats.19 In the present study, the identified metabolites such
266
as glucuronidated 3-MCPD 2-palmitate (M12), glutathione conjugate of monopalmitate (M13),
267
sulfonated dipalmitate (M15) and glucuronided 3-MCPD (M16) are the typical phase II
268
metabolites in vivo. By conjugating with the functional groups, the water solubility of these
269
metabolites could be increased, which might accelerate their distribution and excretion.19
270
Glucuronidated 3-MCPD (M16) and free 3-MCPD (M17) were the common metabolites of
271
3-MCPD dipalmitate and 3-MCPD 1-palmitate,19 suggesting that both 3-MCPD diester and
272
3-MCPD monoerster treatments would lead to 3-MCPD-induced toxic effect in vivo.6,7,9-11
273
Interestingly, DHPMA and β-chlorolactic acid, which were reported in urine as 3-MCPD
274
dipalmitate metabolites by Barocelli and others in Wistar rats with a LC-MS/MS method,10 were
275
not detected in the present study. This might be partially due to the different animal models,
276
samples preparation, analytical instrument resolutions, and data analysis software for the two 15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
277
studies,10 warranting additional research to investigate the absorption, distribution and
278
metabolism of 3-MCPD esters.
279
Distribution of 3-MCPD dipalmitate metabolites. The distribution of 3-MCPD
280
dipalmitate and its metabolites in plasma, liver, kidney, brain, testis, thymus, intestine, spleen,
281
urine and faeces were summarized in Figure 4. 3-MCPD dipalmitate was detected in liver,
282
kidney, brain, testis, thymus, intestine, spleen and plasma of SD rats after a single oral dose of
283
1600 mg/kg BW, suggesting that 3-MCPD dipalmitate could be absorbed into the plasma and
284
distributed into tissues in its original form. The distribution of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in tissues,
285
such as kidney, testis, brain and thymus, might explain its specific organ toxicities found in the
286
previous studies.6-11 The UPLC-QTOF-MS chromatogram of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in liver is
287
provided in Supplementary Figure S8. The quantification of 3-MCPD dipalmitate and its
288
metabolites in each organ or tissue samples was not performed due to the lack of standards, as
289
well as the facts that no international standard was included during sample preparation for
290
quantitative analysis, and that the free 3-MCPD was estimated using a GC-MS method. 3-MCPD
291
dipalmitate could be detected in faeces at time point of 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after oral
292
administration, but could not be found in urine (Figure 4). This was supported by Abraham and
293
colleagues’ observation that about 33% of 3-MCPD dipalmitate (53.2 mg/kg BW) was found in
294
faeces as ester form, and their conclusion that 3-MCPD dipalmitate could be excreted via
295
faeces.14
296
Furthermore, M0, M1, M5, M6, M7 and M14 were detected in the plasma for the first time. 16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 37
Page 17 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
297
M0, M1, M2, M5, M6, M7, M12, M13, M14, M15 and M17 were also detected in liver,
298
suggesting that the hydrolysis, transesterification and endogenous substance conjugation reaction
299
might occur in liver. It should be noted that orally administered 3-MCPD dipalmitate and
300
3-MCPD dioleate were metabolized to glycidol in F344 rats,20 suggesting that the similar
301
dechlorination reaction occurred in F344 and SD rats. M0, M1, M2, M5, M6, M12, M13, M14
302
and M17 were detected in kidney, indicating that these metabolites might also contribute to the
303
specific organ toxicity to kidney. M0, M1, M13, M14 and M15 were detected in brain,
304
suggesting their potential to pass through the blood-brain barrier. M0, M1, M5, M13 and M14
305
were detected in testis, suggesting their potential to pass through the blood-testis barrier.
306
3-MCPD dipalmitate and its metabolites were detected in the brain and testis under the
307
experimental conditions which was in a good agreement with the previous reports that 3-MCPD
308
1-palmitate could transport through the blood-brain barrier and blood-testis barrier,20, 27 inducing
309
possible toxicity in central nervous system (CNS) and spermatogenic cells.28 M0, M1, M14 and
310
M15 were detected in thymus, agreeing to the previous observation that apoptotic bodies were
311
found in 3-MCPD diesters treated Swiss mice.9 All of the metabolites except M16 and M17 were
312
detected in intestine. M0, M1, M2, M5, M6, M12, M13 and M14 were detected in spleen,
313
warranting additional research to investigate their possible contribution to immune suppression.
314
These results also supported that the hydrolysis, transesterification, glucuronide conjugation,
315
glutathione conjugation and sulfate conjugation occurred in SD rats. M14, M15, M16 and M17
316
were detected in urine, suggesting that 3-MCPD dipalmitate could be excreted through urine 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
317
after converted to more polar substances. 3-MCPD (M17) was detected in liver, kidney and urine
318
using a modified DGF method of GC-MS.26 The same metabolite (M17) of 3-MCPD dipalmitate
319
had been found in urine of Wistar rats in previous studies.10, 14 M0, M1, M2, M4, M5, M6, M7,
320
M9, M10, M11, M14 and M15 were detected in faeces, indicated another possible excretion way
321
of 3-MCPD dipalmitate and its metabolites.
322
One sn-2 3-MCPD monoester (M1), together with other four possible sn-2 3-MCPD
323
monoesters (M8-M11), were detected in the present study. These metabolites were possibly from
324
the hydrolysis of the 3-MCPD diesters (M0, M4-M7). To date, little is known about the potential
325
toxicological properties of the sn-2 3-MCPD monoesters in vivo, warranting additional studies.
326
In addition, 3-MCPD, its fatty acid esters and glycidyl ester (M0-M11, M16) were detected
327
in tissue and body fluid (Figure 4) at all the five time points except 48 h, suggesting that
328
3-MCPD dipalmitate might be metabolized and excreted between 24 h and 48 h after oral
329
administration of 1600 mg/kg BW 3-MCPD dipalmitate. M12-M15 were detected at all the five
330
time points in tissue and urine (Figure 4), suggesting that the metabolism and excretion of
331
3-MCPD dipalmitate was much slower than 3-MCPD 1-palmitate in SD rats.19 M16 was detected
332
in the urine sample at all the five time points except 48 h.
333
Possible metabolic pathway of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in SD rat. A possible metabolic
334
pathway of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in SD rat was proposed using MetaboLynx software (Figure 4).
335
Briefly, 3-MCPD dipalmitate could undergo an elimination reaction, losing a fatty acid and Cl,
336
to form a glycidyl ester, or be hydrolyzed to form 3-MCPD monoesters and further to free 18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 37
Page 19 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
337
3-MCPD (phase I metabolites). The phase I metabolites could further undergo possible
338
conjugation reactions to form more polar metabolites for urine excretion (phase II metabolites).
339
3-MCPD was categorized as a ‘possible human carcinogen’-category 2B by International
340
Agency for Research on Cancer.32 Seefelder and colleagues demonstrated that 95% of 3-MCPD
341
dipalmitate could be hydrolyzed to 3-MCPD in vitro within 90 min, 18 whereas Kaze and
342
colleagues found that the hydrolysis rate of 3-MCPD 2-oleate was 80% slower than 3-MCPD
343
1-oleate by the pancreatic lipase in vitro.17 Moreover, an in vivo experiment using a rat model
344
also showed that more than 70% of 3-MCPD dipalmitate was metabolized to 3-MCPD.10, 14 In
345
the present study, except free 3-MCPD, various 3-MCPD fatty acid esters and endogenous
346
substance conjugation metabolites were detected, with possible urine and fecal excretions.
347
In summary, the present study showed that 3-MCPD dipalmitate could be absorbed and
348
distributed to organs and tissues including brain and testis. It could also be metabolized to other
349
3-MCPD diesters, 3-MCPD monoesters, glycidyl ester, 3-MCPD or endogenous substance
350
conjugation metabolites, as well as excreted through both faeces and urine.
351 352
Abbreviations
353
3-MCPD, 3-monochloropropane 1,2-diol; ADME, distribution, metabolism and excretion;
354
AUC0-∞, total area under the plasma concentration-time curve; BW, body weight; CL, clearance
355
rate; Cmax, peak plasma concentration; CNS, central nervous system; DHPMA,
356
2,3-dihydroxypropyl mercapturic acid; LC-MS, Liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy; 19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
357
LOD, limit of detection; LOQ, limit of quantification; MRM, multiple reaction monitoring;
358
MRT, mean residence time; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; QTOF-MS, quadrupole time of
359
flight-mass spectroscopy; RSD, relative standard deviation; SD, Sprague Dawley; SFC,
360
supercritical fluid chromatography; T1/2, elimination half-life; Tmax, time to reach Cmax; UPCC,
361
Ultra Performance Convergence Chromatography; UPLC, ultraperformance liquid
362
chromatography; TQS-MS, triple quadrupole-mass spectroscopy; Vd, volume of distribution
363 364 365
Funding We gratefully acknowledge the partial financial support from the National Key Research
366
and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC1600500); the Chinese National
367
Natural Science Foundation (Grant 31501479); and a grant from the Beijing Advanced
368
Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology & Business
369
University (BTBU).
370 371
Supporting Information.
372
MS spectra of standard compounds and identified metabolites, and representative
373
chromatograms of typical metabolites.
374
Supplementary Figure S1. MS/MS spectra of synthetic standard compounds. (A) 3-MCPD
375
dipalmitate, (B) 3-MCPD 1-palmitate, and (C) 3-MCPD 2-palmitate.
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 37
Page 21 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
376
Supplementary Figure S2. MRM chromatogram of 3-MCPD 1-palmitate and 3-MCPD
377
2-palmitate by UPCC-QQQ-MS. (A) Standard of 3-MCPD 1-palmitate (> 90%) and 3-MCPD
378
2-palmitate, (B) Standard of 3-MCPD 2-palmitate (> 90%), (C) Rat intestine sample after oral
379
administration of 1600 mg/kgBW 3-MCPD dipalmitate, (D) Rat liver sample after oral
380
administration of 1600 mg/kgBW 3-MCPD dipalmitate.
381
Supplementary Figure S3. The MS1 spectrum of the metabolites. (A) M0, (B) M2, (C) M3, (D)
382
M4, (E) M5, (F) M6, (G) M7, (H) M8, (I) M9, (J) M10.
383
Supplementary Figure S4. The MS1 spectrum of the metabolites. (A) M11, (B) M12, (C) M13,
384
(D) M14, (E) M15, (F) M16.
385
Supplementary Figure S5. The MS2 spectrum of the parent and the metabolites at a collision
386
energy 20-35 eV. (A) M0, (B) M2, (C) M3, (D) M4, (E) M5, (F) M6, (G) M7, (H) M8, (I) M9, (J)
387
M10.
388
Supplementary Figure S6. The MS2 spectrum of the metabolites at a collision energy 20-35 eV.
389
(A) M11, (B) M12, (C) M13, (D) M14, (E) M15, (F) M16.
390
Supplementary Figure S7. (A) The extract ion chromatogram (EIC) of M17 in a rat liver
391
sample extract, and (B) the MS spectrum of M17. M17 was identified by using a modified DGF
392
GC-MS method.26
393
Supplementary Figure S8. Typical UPLC-QTOF-MS extract ion chromatogram (EIC) and its
394
integration of the liver sample for the 3-MCPD dipalmitate 6 h after oral administration of
395
3-MCPD dipalmitate to rats. 21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
396
22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 37
Page 23 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
397
Reference
398
1. Svejkovska, B.; Novotny, O.; Divinova, V.; Reblova, Z.; Doleza,l M.; Velisek, J. Esters of
399 400
3-chloropropane-1,2-diol in foodstuffs. Czech J. Food Sci. 2004, 22(5), 190-196. 2. Wöhrlin, F.; Fry, H.; Lahrssen-Wiederholt, M.; Preiß-Weigert, A. Occurrence of fatty acid
401
esters of 3-MCPD, 2-MCPD and glycidol in infant formula. Food Addit. Contam. Part A
402
Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2015, 32(11), 1810-1822.
403
3. Weisshaar, R. Determination of total 3-chloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD) in edible oils by
404
cleavage of MCPD esters with sodium methoxide. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Tech. 2008, 110,
405
183-186.
406 407 408
4. Weißhaar, R. Fatty acid esters of 3-MCPD: Overview of occurrence and exposure estimates. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2011, 113, 304-308. 5. Larsen, J. C. 3-MCPD esters in food products. Summary report of a workshop held in
409
February 2009 in Brussels, Belgium.
410
http://www.ilsi.org/europe/publications/final%20version%203%20mcpd%20esters.pdf
411
[October 2009].
412
6. Liu, M.; Gao, B.; Qin, F.; Wu, P.; Shi, H.; Luo, W.; Ma, A.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, X.; Yu, L. L.
413
Acute oral toxicity of 3-MCPD mono-and dipalmitic esters in Swiss mice and their
414
cytotoxicity in NRK-52E rat kidney cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 3785-3791.
415 416
7. Onami, S.; Cho, Y. M.; Toyoda, T.; Mizuta, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Nishikawa, A.; Ogawa, K. A 13-week repeated dose study of three 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol fatty acid esters in F344 23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
417 418
rats. Arch. Toxicol. 2014, 88, 871-880. 8. Onami, S.; Cho, Y. M.; Toyoda, T.; Horibata, K.; Ishii, Y.; Umemura, T.; Honma, M.;
419
Nohmi, T.; Nishikawa, A.; Ogawa, K. Absence of in vivo genotoxicity of
420
3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol and associated fatty acid esters in a 4-week comprehensive
421
toxicity study using F344 gpt delta rats. Mutagenesis. 2014, 29, 295-302.
422
9. Liu, M; Liu, J; Wu, Y; Gao, B.; Wu, P; Shi, H.; Sun, X.; Huang, H.; Wang, T. T.; Yu, L.
423
Preparation of five 3-MCPD fatty acid esters, and the effects of their chemical structures on
424
acute oral toxicity in Swiss mice. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97(3):841-848
425
10. Barocelli, E.; Corradi, A.; Mutti, A.; Petronini, P. G. Comparison between 3-MCPD and its
426
palmitic esters in a 90-day toxicological study. Available from:
427
[June 2011].
428 429
11. Liu, M.; Huang, G.; Wang, T. T.; Sun, X.; Yu, L. L. 3-MCPD 1-Palmitate Induced Tubular Cell Apoptosis In Vivo via JNK/p53 Pathways. Toxicol. Sci. 2016, 151, 181-192.
430
12. Lu, J.; Wang, Z.; Ren, M.; Feng, G; Ye, B.; Wang, Y.; Fang, B.; Deng, X.; Guan, S. A
431
4-week study of four 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol diesters on lipid metabolism in
432
C57BL/6J mice. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 40(2), 453-458.
433
13. Buhrke, T.; Weisshaar, R.; Lampen, A. Absorption and metabolism of the food contaminant
434
3-chloro-1,2-propanediol (3-MCPD) and its fatty acid esters by human intestinal Caco-2
435
cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2011, 85(10), 1201-1208.
436
14. Abraham, K.; Appel, K. E.; Berger-Preiss, E.; Apel, E.; Gerling, S.; Mielke, H.; 24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 37
Page 25 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
437
Creutzenberg, O.; Lampen, A. Relative oral bioavailability of 3-MCPD from 3-MCPD fatty
438
acid esters in rats. Arch Toxicol. 2013, 87(4), 649-659.
439
15. Buhrke, T.; Frenzel, F.; Kuhlmann, J.; Lampen, A. 2-Chloro-1,3-propanediol (2-MCPD) and
440
its fatty acid esters: cytotoxicity, metabolism, and transport by human intestinal Caco-2 cells.
441
Arch. Toxicol. 2015, 89, 2243-2251.
442
16. Andreoli, R.; Cirlini, M.; Mutti, A. Quantification of 3-MCPD and its mercapturic metabolite
443
in human urine: validation of an LC-MS-MS method and its application in the general
444
population. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 4823-4827.
445
17. Kaze, N.; Watanabe, Y.; Sato, H.; Murota, K.; Kotaniguchi, M.; Yamamoto, H.; Inui, H.;
446
Kitamura, S. Estimation of the Intestinal Absorption and Metabolism Behaviors of 2- and
447
3-Monochloropropanediol Esters. Lipids. 2016, 51(8), 913-922.
448
18. Seefelder, W.; Varga, N.; Studer, A.; Williamson, G.; Scanlan, F. P.; Stadler, R. H. Esters of
449
3-chloro-1,2-propanediol (3-MCPD) in vegetable oils: significance in the formation of
450
3-MCPD. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2008, 25,
451
391-400.
452
19. Gao, B.; Liu, M.; Huang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, T. T.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Yu, L. L.
453
Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion of 3-MCPD 1-Monopalmitate after Oral
454
Administration in Rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65(12), 2609-2614.
455 456
20. Onami, S.; Cho, Y. M.; Toyoda, T.; Akagi, J.; Fujiwara, S.; Ochiai, R.; Tsujino, K.; Nishikawa, A.; Ogawa, K., Orally administered glycidol and its fatty acid esters as well as 25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
457
3-MCPD fatty acid esters are metabolized to 3-MCPD in the F344 rat. Regul. Toxicol.
458
Pharmacol. 2015, 73, 726-731.
459
21. Kong, F.; Pang, X.; Zhong, K.; Guo, Z.; Li, X.; Zhong, D; Chen, X. Increased Plasma
460
Exposures of Conjugated Metabolites of Morinidazole in Renal Failure Patients: A Critical
461
Role of Uremic Toxins. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2017, 45(6), 593-603.
462
22. Zelinková, Z.; Novotný, O.; Schůrek, J.; Velísek, J.; Hajslová, J.; Dolezal, M. Occurrence of
463
3-MCPD fatty acid esters in human breast milk. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal
464
Control Expo Risk Assess. 2008, 25(6), 669-676.
465
23. Lee, J. W.; Uchikata, T.; Matsubara, A.; Nakamura, T.; Fukusaki, E.; Bamba, T. Application
466
of supercritical fluid chromatography/mass spectrometry to lipid profiling of soybean. J.
467
Biosci. Bioeng. 2012, 113(2), 262-268.
468
24. Zhou, Q.; Gao, B.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Shi, H.; Yu, L. Chemical profiling of triacylglycerols
469
and diacylglycerols in cow milk fat by ultra-performance convergence chromatography
470
combined with a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2014, 143,
471
199-204.
472 473
25. Trotter, P. J.; Storch, J. Fatty acid esterification during differentiation of the human intestinal cell line Caco-2. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268(14), 10017-23.
474
26. Fatty-acid-bound 3-chloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD) and 2,3-epoxipropane-1-ol (glycidol).
475
Determination in oils and fats by GC/MS (Differential measurement). DGF Standard Method
476
C-VI 18 (10); Deutsche Einheitsmethoden zur Untersuchung von Fetten, Fettprodukten, 26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 37
Page 27 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
477
Tensiden und verwandten Stoffen; Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft: Stuttgart,
478
Germany, 2011.
479
27. Edwards, E. M.; Jones, A. R.; Waites, G. M. The entry of alpha-chlorohydrin into body fluids
480
of male rats and its effect upon the incorporation of glycerol into lipids. J. Reprod.
481
Fertil.1975, 43(2), 225-232.
482
28. Matsui, K.; Mishima, M.; Nagai, Y.; Yuzuriha, T.; Yoshimura, T. Absorption, distribution,
483
metabolism, and excretion of donepezil (Aricept) after a single oral administration to Rat.
484
Drug Metab. Dispos. 1999, 27(12), 1406-1414.
485
29. Lee, J. K.; Byun, J. A.; Park, S. H.; Kim, H. S.; Park, J. H.; Eom, J. H.; Oh, H. Y. Evaluation
486
of the potential immunotoxicity of 3-monochloro-1,2-propanediol in Balb/c mice. I. Effect on
487
antibody forming cell, mitogen-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation, splenic subset, and
488
natural killer cell activity. Toxicology. 2004, 204(1), 1-11.
489
30. Lee, J. K.; Byun, J. A.; Park, S. H.; Choi, H. J.; Kim, H. S.; Oh, H. Y. Evaluation of the
490
potential immunotoxicity of 3-monochloro-1,2-propanediol in Balb/c mice II. Effect on
491
thymic subset, delayed-type hypersensitivity, mixed-lymphocyte reaction, and peritoneal
492
macrophage activity. Toxicology. 2005, 211(3), 187-196.
493
31. Byun, J. A.; Ryu, M. H.; Lee, J. K. The immunomodulatory effects of
494
3-monochloro-1,2-propanediol on murine splenocyte and peritoneal macrophage function in
495
vitro. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2006, 20(3), 272-278.
496
32. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Some Chemicals Present in Industrial 27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
497
and Consumer Products. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to
498
Humans, vol. 101, pp. 349–374 Lyon, France, 2012.
499
28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 37
Page 29 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
500
FIGURE CAPTIONS
501
Figure 1. Chemical structures of metabolites.
502
Figure 2. Typical UPLC-QTOF-MS extract ion chromatogram (EIC) of (A) reference standard
503
and (B) sample for the M1 after oral administration of 3-MCPD dipalmitate to rats.
504
Figure 3. MSE spectra of the M1. (A) MS1 spectrum and (B) MS2 spectrum at a collision energy
505
20-35 eV.
506
Figure 4. Possible metabolic pathway and distribution of the metabolites of 3-MCPD dipalmitate
507
in rats (Tissue or body fluid was identified by UPLC-QTOF (Phenyl Column), and the
508
distribution of the metabolites of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in rat based on the peak area. L, Liver; K,
509
Kidney; B, Brain; P, Plasma; Te, Testis; Th, Thymus; I, Intestine; S, Spleen; F, Faeces; and U,
510
Urine; Urine sample was identified by UPLC-QTOF (HILIC Column); 3-MCPD was identified
511
by using a modified DGF GC-MS method.)
29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 30 of 37
Table 1. The Kinetic Parameters of 3-MCPD Dipalmitate in Rats After Oral Gavage. Rats ID Unit
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mean
SD
Cmax a
ng/mL
120.00
122.00
124.00
152.00
137.00
155.00
135.00
15.54
Tmax
h
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
0.00
h
3.31
3.17
3.21
4.29
5.45
3.76
3.87
0.89
h
4.95
4.76
4.75
5.04
5.55
5.45
5.08
0.34
L/h/g
3.58
3.63
3.65
3.51
3.45
3.17
3.50
0.18
L/g
17.06
16.63
16.90
21.73
27.09
28.65
21.34
5.42
h ng/mL
444.01
440.49
441.14
455.98
464.15
505.02
458.47
24.65
t1/2
b
c
MRT CL
e
Vd
f
d
AUC 0-∞ a
g
Cmax is the maximum concentration of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in rats’ plasma; b Tmax is the time of reach the Cmax after oral administration to rats; c t1/2 is the time
that the concentration of 3-MCPD dipalmitate reduced to half of Cmax; d MRT is the abbreviation of mean residence time, indicate the average time of 3-MCPD dipalmitate stays in the body; e CL is clearance rate of 3-MCPD dipalmitate in rats’ plasma, f Vd is volume of distribution; g AUC is the abbreviation of area under the curve, represent the total amount of 3-MCPD dipalmitate stay in the body.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 31 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 2. Identification of 3-MCPD Dipalmitate Metabolites in Rat Tissues and Body Fluid. Description M0
Precursor ion [M+Na]
Rt
Molecular
calculated mass
Measured mass
Error
Mass fragment of
(min)
formula
(m/z)
(m/z)
(ppm)
metabolites
9.60
C35H67O4Cl
609.4627
609.4628
0.4
239.2375 551.5025 573.4868
M1
Substitution of C16H30O [M+Na]
8.49
C19H37O3Cl
371.2329
371.2302
-0.2
313.2730
M2
Substitution of C16H31OCl [M+H]/[ M+Na]
8.44
C19H36O3
313.2743/335.2562
313.2733/335.2566
-2.9/1.2
73.0305 95.0697 239.2340
M3
Substitution of C16H30O with C16H28O
9.56
C35H65O4Cl
607.4469
607.4468
-0.2
[M+Na] M4
Substitution of C16H30O with C18H34O
571.4701 9.81
C37H71O4Cl
637.4939
637.4931
-1.3
[M+Na] M5
Substitution of C16H30O with C18H32O Substitution of C16H30O with C18H30O
9.72
C37H69O4Cl
635.4782
635.4774
-5.0
Substitution of C16H30O with C20H30O
239.2349 577.5190 599.5034
9.64
C37H67O4Cl
633.4626
633.4626
0
[M+Na] M7
239.2349 579.5331 601.5213
[M+Na] M6
239.2348 549.4868
239.2348 575.5033 597.4858
9.68
C39H67O4Cl
657.4626
657.4626
0
[M+Na]
239.2347 599.5034 621.4859
M8
M4 substitution of C16H30O [M+Na]
8.60
C21H41O3Cl
399.2642
399.2638
-1.0
341.2982
M9
M5 substitution of C16H30O [M+Na]
8.52
C21H39O3Cl
397.2485
397.2482
-0.5
339.2817
M10
M6 substitution of C16H30O [M+Na]
8.41
C21H37O3Cl
395.2329
395.2327
-0.5
337.2733
M11
M7 substitution of C16H30O [M+Na]
8.43
C23H37O4Cl
419.2329
419.2320
-2.1
361.3286
M12
Substitution of C16H30O with glucuronide
6.45
C25H45ClO9
525.2830
525.2843
0.4
331.2244 489.3151
8.04
C29H53N3O9S
620.3581
620.3595
2.3
313.2741 489.3024
conjugation [M+H] M13
S-Glutathione conjugation M2 [M+H]
545.3233 M14
Substitution of C19H35O2Cl [M-H]
8.15
C16H32O2
255.2324 31
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
255.2322
0.4
239.2319
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
M15
Substitution of Chlorine with two sulfate
5.00
C35H68O12S2
745.4230
745.4201
Page 32 of 37
-1.5
conjugation [M+H]
605.2513
M16
M12 substitution of C16H30O
M17
3-MCPD
a Urine
sample was analyzed using a UPLC-QTOF (HILIC Column).
b
b
351.1799 409.2241
[M-H]a
3.55
C9H15ClO8
285.0377
285.0389
4.2
177.0384 193.0324
11.90
C3H7ClO2
196
196
--
91 147
3-MCPD was identified using a modified DGF GC-MS method.26
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 33 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
O O
O
O OH
O
Cl
O
O
Cl
Cl O
O
O
O O
O
O
O Cl O
M0
Cl
O
O
O
O
O
M4
O
M5
M9
O M11
M10
O
O
O
O
O
HO
Cl
S OH
O
O O
M8
HN
OH
Cl
Cl O
O
O
OH OH
Cl O
O
Cl
Cl OH OH
Cl O
O
(SO4)2
NH2
H N
O
COOH O
O
HOOC M13
M12
O
OH
HO
OH
OH
O
OH
M14
Cl
OH HO Cl
O O
Cl OH
M7
O
O
OH
O
M6
O
Cl
O
Cl O
O
O
OH
O
Cl
O
OH
O O
O O
O O
O
O
Cl O
OH
O
O
Cl O
Cl
O
O
O
HO
O
Cl
Cl O O
O
O
O
M3
O
O
O
O O
HO
M2
M1
O
M16
M17
Figure 1.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
M15
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2.
34
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 34 of 37
Page 35 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3.
35
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4.
36
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 36 of 37
Page 37 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TOC Graphic O
O
O
O
O
Cl
Cl
O
O
OH Cl
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
Cl
O
M0
O Cl
Cl
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OH
M12
M11
O
HO
OH HO
O
NH2
H N O
O O O
O
O
O
Cl
HO HO
Cl O M10
M9
OH
Cl OH OH
O
O
S
O
O
Cl O
O
M8
O
Cl OH OH
Cl O
M7
O
O
Cl OH OH
HN
O
O M6
O
O
O
O
Cl
O M5
O
OH Cl
Cl
O
OH
OH O
O
Cl O
Cl
O
O O
O
M4
O
O
O Cl
Cl O
O
M3
O
O
O
O O
M2
M1
O
O
O
O Cl O
(SO4)2 O
COOH O
Cl
O OH
OH OH
O
Cl HO
OH
O
O
HOOC M13
M14
M15
M16
M17
37
ACS Paragon Plus Environment