Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE LIBRARIES
Article
Uranium Release from Acidic Weathered Hanford Sediments: Single-Pass Flow-Through and Column Experiments Guohui Wang, Wooyong Um, Zheming Wang, Estela Reinoso-Maset, Nancy M Washton, Karl T. Mueller, Nicolas Perdrial, Peggy A. O'Day, and Jon Chorover Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03475 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Sep 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 9, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
Uranium Release from Acidic Weathered Hanford Sediments: Single-Pass Flow-Through and Column Experiments
1 2 3
Guohui Wang1, Wooyong Um1,2,*, Zheming Wang1, Estela Reinoso-Maset3, Nancy M. Washton1, Karl T. Mueller1, Nicolas Perdrial4,5, Peggy A. O’Day3, and Jon Chorover4
4 5
1
6 2
7 8 9 10 11
3
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, South Korea
Sierra Nevada Research Institute and School of Natural Sciences, University of California Merced, Merced, CA 95343, USA 4
Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 5
Department of Geology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
12 13 14 15
*Corresponding author: Wooyong Um
16 17
Address: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, P7-54, 902 Battelle Boulevard, Richland, WA 99354
18
E-mail:
[email protected] ;
[email protected] 19
Phone: (509) 372-6227. Fax: (509) 371-7249
20 21 22 23
* Current address: Division of Advanced Nuclear Engineering (DANE) / Division of Environmental Science and Engineering (DESE), Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, South Korea
24
E-mail:
[email protected] 25
Phone:+82-10-6765-2088
26 27
To be submitted to Environmental Science & Technology
28
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
29
Abstract
30
The reaction of acidic radioactive waste with sediments can induce mineral transformation
31
reactions that, in turn, control contaminant fate. Here, sediment weathering by synthetic
32
uranium-containing acid solutions was investigated using bench-scale experiments to simulate
33
waste disposal conditions at Hanford’s cribs, USA. During acid weathering, the presence of
34
phosphate exerted a strong influence over uranium mineralogy and a rapidly precipitated,
35
crystalline uranium phosphate phase (meta-ankoleite [K(UO2)(PO4)·3H2O]) was identified using
36
spectroscopic and diffraction-based techniques. In phosphate-free system, uranium oxyhydroxide
37
minerals such as K-compreignacite [K2(UO2)6O4(OH)6·7H2O] were formed. Single-pass flow-
38
through (SPFT) and column leaching experiments using synthetic Hanford pore water showed
39
that uranium precipitated as meta-ankoleite during acid weathering was strongly retained in the
40
sediments, with an average release rate of 2.67E-12 mol g-1 s-1. In the absence of phosphate,
41
uranium release was controlled by dissolution of uranium oxyhydroxide (compreignacite-type)
42
mineral with a release rate of 1.05-2.42E-10 mol g-1 s-1. The uranium mineralogy and release
43
rates determined for both systems in this study support the development of accurate U-release
44
models for prediction of contaminant transport. These results suggest that phosphate minerals
45
may be a good candidate for uranium remediation approaches at contaminated sites.
46
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 30
Page 3 of 30
47
48
Environmental Science & Technology
Introduction Upon intentional or accidental introduction to the subsurface, radioactive waste interacts
49
heterogeneously with host sediments by way of adsorption-desorption or precipitation-
50
dissolution reactions.1-2 Waste solutions, which are often highly acidic or alkaline, may be far
51
from equilibrium with receiving sediments, thereby leading to mineral transformation reactions
52
that can affect the transport and fate of waste-derived contaminants.3-4 Considering the different
53
geochemical properties between minerals with regard to their reactions with waste contaminants,
54
resolving molecular-scale interactions between waste-derived contaminants and newly-
55
developed geomedia constituents is needed to improve predictive modeling of reactive
56
contaminant transport.
57
One pertinent example of this need pertains to uranium (U) contamination of soil and
58
groundwater at the Department of Energy’s Hanford site, WA, which is the largest and most
59
complex environmental cleanup site in the USA and a major concern for public health. At
60
Hanford, hundreds of millions of liters of uranium-containing acidic aqueous waste, generated
61
during the bi-phosphate process for plutonium processing during World War II and the Cold War,
62
were disposed of in a number of unlined underground, box-like excavation structures called cribs.
63
Approximately 529 x 106 L of acidic waste was discharged into two cribs (denoted 216-U-8 and
64
216-U-12) at 200 Area of Hanford site from 1952 to 1988. The waste contained about 34 Mg U,
65
3400 Mg nitrate, and other fission products, e.g., Tc-99, H-3, Sr-90 and Cs- 137.5 Furthermore,
66
these waste streams were known to contain variable concentrations of phosphate, which could
67
have significant implications for U fate. The large volume of wastewater discharged to these two
68
unlined cribs was sufficient to cause the contaminant-containing acidic aqueous waste to 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
69
percolate into the sandy subsurface sediments and reach the underlying groundwater.5 Thus, the
70
vadose zone beneath the cribs is known to contain subsurface contamination by radioactive and
71
nonradioactive contaminants from U processing.5
72
Uranium is hexavalent [U(VI)] and exists as the uranyl ion (UO22+) under oxic conditions.
73
Interactions between U(VI) and mineral phases present in Hanford sediment, including
74
sorption/desorption, complexation, and reduction reactions, have been well documented in the
75
literatures.1-2, 6-12 In addition to these relatively direct U(VI)-mineral interactions, weathering of
76
the underlying sediment minerals by the acidic or alkaline waste streams also affects the fate and
77
transport of radionuclides in the subsurface. Previous studies have shown that leaking,
78
hyperalkaline, caustic Hanford waste reacts with Hanford sediments, resulting in primary
79
mineral dissolution and secondary mineral precipitation, and significantly altering sediment
80
properties and radionuclide transport.3-4, 13-14 However, less is known about the geochemical
81
reactions between acidic waste streams and the underlying sediments, and the subsequent
82
contaminant release from waste-weathered sediment by natural pore water. Szecsody et al.15
83
investigated mineral dissolution of several Hanford sediments at acidic conditions and their
84
impacts on U transport. They found that mineral dissolutions led in rapid increases in aqueous
85
carbonate and phosphate, resulting in significant shallow U mineral dissolution and deeper U
86
precipitations (likely phosphates and carbonates) with downward U migration. Gateman et al.16
87
examined the effects of low pH on uranium partitioning to Hanford sediments. They reported
88
that much greater U partitioning was observed at conditions of pH 5 than at pH 2 and pH 8,
89
which was likely due to the precipitation of uranyl phosphate in addition to adsorption
90
mechanism. These studies mainly simulated the U fate and transport behavior during the acidic
91
waste reservoir operating time. But unfortunately, both studies didn’t use waste simulants 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 30
Page 5 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
92
(acidified deionized or groundwater was used as the waste matrix), which could result in
93
geochemical reaction bias from the real legacy sediment weathering history. Besides the above laboratory studies which addressed the vadose zone as a whole at
94 95
Hanford site, extensive site-specific U speciation was investigated on the sediments below the
96
inactive North Process Pond at Hanford site 300 Area which served as an acidic waste reservoir
97
and neutralized with NaOH. Multi-scale electron microscopic and spectroscopic analyses on
98
those samples focusing on U speciation and solid-phase host have been conducted by several
99
researchers.17-21 They found that metatorbernite [Cu(UO2)2(PO4)2·8H2O] precipitated at the
100
intermediate depths in the vadose zone, likely during pond operations when the U, Cu, and P
101
present in this phase all originated from waste release, possibly at different times. However, the
102
U(VI)-phosphates formation process discussed in these studies are speculative due to the lack of
103
historical data, since the vadose zone pore water was not collected or analyzed during the
104
lifetime of the pond operation. Contrast to 300 Area, less study on acidic waste contamination at
105
200 Area has been conducted. Recently, Kanematsu et al.22 synthesized acidic solutions
106
according to waste disposal documents on cribs 216-U-8 and 216-U-12, and studied uranium
107
speciation in the presence and absence of dissolved silica and phosphate under variable pH
108
conditions to assess thermodynamic and kinetic controls on the precipitation of uranyl solid
109
phases. Among other observations, they reported strong effect of phosphate on uranium
110
speciation in the tested systems; in the presence of phosphate (3 mM), meta-ankoleite initially
111
precipitated as the primary phase at pH 3, 5, or 7 regardless of the presence of 1 mM dissolved
112
silica.
113 114
Overall, investigations on uranium speciation and transport in the Hanford vadose zone subjected to acidic weathering are not yet well documented. Specifically, the subsequent U 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
115
release from those legacy weathered sediments is rarely reported. Understanding how acidic
116
aqueous waste-sediment reaction affects U speciation and coordination, and how that, in turn,
117
influences the subsequent U release, is key to predicting the environmental impact of these
118
legacy sediments. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: (i) determine the U phases
119
present in acid-waste weathered Hanford sediments below the waste disposal cribs; (ii)
120
understand how such sediments react with Hanford pore water; and (iii) estimate overall release
121
rates of the U-containing phases to predict U release and subsurface transport. Legacy sediments
122
from 216-U-8/U-12 crib sites were simulated in bench-scale experiments where uncontaminated
123
Hanford sediment were reacted with synthetic acidic waste solutions containing U, in the
124
presence and absence of dissolved phosphate (PO43-). The U speciation and the nature of U-
125
containing mineral phases present in the weathered sediments were characterized using a
126
combination of spectroscopic, microscopic, and diffraction-based techniques. Uranium release
127
from the weathered sediments was investigated by leaching tests. Because of the strong effect of
128
phosphate on uranium immobilization,23-27 weathering of sediment minerals by phosphate-
129
containing acidic uranium waste would result in U sequestration in distinct solid-phase products
130
with low aqueous solubility and slow release rates, thus limiting subsurface U transport.
131
Materials and Methods
132
Materials Preparation
133
Acidic crib waste solution simulants. Based on the type and amount of waste discharged to the
134
two cribs (216-U-8 and 216-U-12), several acidic synthetic crib wastes (ASCW) have been
135
proposed.22 Solution chemistry indicates that the presence or absence of phosphate in the waste
136
solution is a principal constraint on reaction pathways.22 In this study, two acidic waste simulants 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 30
Page 7 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
137
(pH 3) were adopted: ASCW3 containing no PO43- and ASCW6 containing PO43-. The two waste
138
simulants were prepared using NO3- and were identical in chemical composition (U: 1 mM, NO3:
139
~100 mM, Na: 0.75 mM, Cl: 2.08 mM, and K: 100 mM), except PO43- content (0 mM and 3.00
140
mM of PO43- for ASCW3 and ASCW6, respectively). In ASCW6, rapid precipitation of a solid
141
phase was observed after solution mixing, thus a parallel ASCW6 solution was prepared and the
142
precipitate was filtered for solid characterization.
143
Hanford Fine Sands (HS). Hanford Fine Sand (HS), collected at near surface burial ground
144
excavation at 218-E-12B location and composed of the silty sand facies from the Hanford
145
formation in the Hanford 200 area, was used to represent the sediments at the 216-U-8 and 216-
146
U-12 crib sites. The HS, which contains 0.23 wt.% gravel, 72.61wt.% sand and 27.16 wt.% silt
147
and clay 28, was sieved to remove the size fraction greater than 2 mm prior to experiments. The
148
HS is typical of Hanford formation sediments and contains quartz, K/Na-feldspar and smectite,
149
along with illite and chlorite, as the dominant mineral phases with a low calcium carbonate
150
content (1.75 wt.%), as identified by mineralogical analysis in Serne et al.28
151
Sediment weathering with U-containing acidic waste simulants. The HS was weathered in
152
polyethylene bottles with a solution to solid ratio of 50 (6 L ASCW3 or ASCW6 solution + 120
153
g dry HS) at room temperature (20 ºC). The bottles were shaken once a week and pH values of
154
the supernatant solutions were monitored along the weathering process. After 3 or 15 months
155
reaction, the supernatant solution was carefully removed, and the reacted sediment slurries were
156
collected. Slurries were air-dried for further characterization and leaching experiments. Four
157
weathered sediment samples were prepared and labeled as ASCW3-3, ASCW3-15, ASCW6-3,
158
and ASCW6-15, respectively corresponding to the two solutions and the two weathering times 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
159
(see Table 1). The initial solution pH was ~ 3.0 for ASCW3 and ASCW6, and was buffered to
160
neutral (~ 6.5 - 7.4) after reacted with HS containing carbonate minerals. The evolution of the pH
161
in both ASCW solutions during HS weathering as well as a sediment free control is provided in
162
Figure S1 in the Supporting Information (SI).
163
Characterization of solid samples. Detailed solids characterization, including mineral
164
identification and U speciation, was conducted on the weathered sediments, along with the
165
precipitate formed homogeneously from the ASCW6 solution, using X-ray diffraction (XRD),
166
scanning electron microscope (SEM) with a Focused Ion Beam (FIB), transmission electron
167
microscope (TEM), Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping, extended X-ray absorption
168
fine structure (EXAFS), and time-resolved laser-induced fluorescence (TRLIF) spectroscopy. In
169
addition, U concentrations in the weathered sediments were determined by inductively coupled
170
plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis of HNO3/HF/HCl microwave-assisted digests. The
171
specific surface area of the weathered sediments was measured using the BET (Brunauer-
172
Emmett-Teller) method. Detailed characterization methods for XRD, SEM/TEM-EDS, EXAFS,
173
TRLIF, BET, and microwave digestion are provided in SI.
174
Single-Pass Flow-Through (SPFT) and column leaching experiments. Uranium release from
175
the acid-waste weathered sediments was investigated using the synthesized Hanford site
176
background pore water (BPW) with 0.3 mM HCO3- according to Um et al.8 A single-pass flow-
177
through (SPFT) approach29 was used to investigate the dissolution of the uranyl minerals in the
178
four weathered sediments, where the BPW was contacted with the acidic weathered sediments,
179
resulting in dissolution of uranyl minerals and U release. In addition, two column leaching tests
180
using two weathered HS samples (ASCW3-3 and ASCW6-3) were conducted to provide a more 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 30
Page 9 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
181
realistic simulation of the crib site leaching scenario. The column experiments used high solid:
182
solution ratios (3.6 – 4.0 g/mL; porosity of ~0.38 – 0.4) and pore water flow rates (1 m/day; ~
183
0.1 day solution resident time in the columns). The pH of the effluent was monitored and the
184
uranium concentrations were measured by ICP-MS. The details of the SPFT and column
185
experimental setup are provided in the SI.
186 187
The normalized apparent steady-state release rate (r) of U-bearing minerals in weathered sediments under saturated conditions was determined (in unit of mol g-1 s-1) as: r = [
188
m M
d
]/t
R
(1)
189
where md is the dissolved mass of U (mol) within sampling intervals, calculated through
190
multiplying the steady-state element concentration in the effluent solutions by the collected
191
sample volumes, MR is the remaining mass (g) of U-minerals (meta-ankoleite or K-
192
compreignacite) in the weathered sediments after each sampling event, and t is the length of each
193
leaching interval in seconds. MR was calculated iteratively based on mass balance by subtracting
194
the released U mass during n+1 sampling step from the remained U mas at n step (n = sampling
195
times), and converted into mass of meta-ankoleite or K-compreignacite based on the
196
stoichiometry of U in each of the U-bearing minerals. It should be noted that the calculation of
197
MR was simplified, where only meta-ankoleite and K-compreignacite were assumed to be the
198
dominant U-minerals respectively in ASCW6 and ASCW3 solution-reacted sediment samples,
199
without considering other potential minor U-minerals in the weathered sediments.
200
Results and Discussion
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
201
Solid phase characterization
202
Surface area and U concentration in weathered samples. The BET-determined
203
specific surface area for air-dried weathered-HS varied between 6.04 and 9.19 m2/g (Table 1). A
204
BET-surface area value of 13.7 m2/g on the untreated HS was reported by Um et al.30 Lower
205
measured specific surface area in this study on weathered HS samples (ASCW solution pH 3)
206
could be due to the dissolution of silty and clay particles present in HS. The U concentrations
207
associated with the weathered HS, as determined by microwave digestion (Table 1), show a
208
similar U loading (7.09 – 7.24 mg/g, corresponding to 0.71 - 0.72 wt.%) among all the weathered
209
samples, which minimizes the effect of differences in initial U concentration on U leaching
210
among different samples.
211
X-ray diffraction. The rapidly precipitated phase observed in ASCW6 was identified as
212
meta-ankoleite by powder XRD (Figure 1a). The measured U concentration of 431 mg/g of the
213
precipitate from the ASCW6 solution (Table 1) is not far from a U concentration of 520 mg/g
214
calculated for the theoretical meta-ankoleite composition, which further supports the XRD result.
215
The sharp peaks in the XRD (Figure 1a) indicate the formation of well-crystallized meta-
216
ankoleite. This interpretation is supported by SEM images where clear and sharp mineral shapes
217
were observed (Figure S2). Unreacted HS and HS samples weathered for 3 months in either
218
ASCW6 or ASCW3 solutions were also analyzed by XRD, but no significant difference was
219
observed between the weathered and unreacted samples (data not shown). Uranium was present
220
in the weathered samples, as shown by microwave digest results (Table 1), but the amount (0.71
221
- 0.72 wt. %) was too low to detect a specific U-containing mineral phase by XRD.
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 30
Page 11 of 30
222
Environmental Science & Technology
FIB-SEM/TEM-EDS. The SEM-EDS analysis showed that the freshly precipitated
223
meta-ankoleite from the ASCW6 solution was present as thin platy micrometer-sized particles
224
(Figure S2) with a P:U atomic ratio of ~1. This ratio is further verified by wet chemistry analysis
225
on ASCW6 solution (Table S1), where 0.99 mM U (99% of the U added) and 1.06 mM P were
226
removed from the ASCW6 solution through meta-ankoleite precipitation. In the ASCW6-HS
227
weathering system, meta-ankoleite appeared to precipitate on sediment grains shown in TEM
228
images (Figure 1b), where the EDS mapping analysis illustrates that U is clearly associated with
229
P, and K (indicating meta-ankoleite), but less with Si and Al which represent sediments in this
230
study. Of particular interest, compared to the EDS spectra of the homogeneously precipitated
231
meta-ankoleite from the ASCW6 solution where no Ca signal was observed (Figure S2), and
232
considering the later introduce of Ca into the weathering solution from calcite dissolution, the
233
clear association of Ca with U, P, and K in this system may imply a possible extra Ca-bearing
234
layer “armoring” on the surface of the precipitated meta-ankoleite. A cross-section of the sample
235
was cut using the FIB, and the FIB-TEM-EDS analysis showed that an amorphous phase,
236
consisting of Ca, P, minor U, as well as Si, Al, and Na etc., precipitated on the sediments (Figure
237
S3). In this amorphous layer, the possibility of Ca-P precipitates hosting minor U might not be
238
ruled out due to the high amount of P (3.0 mM/L) and Ca (up to 2.7 mM/L; see Figure S4) in this
239
weathering system. The significant differences of Ca aqueous concentrations (ca. 0.5 mM/L) in
240
the ASCW3-HS (without PO43-) and ACSW6-HS (with PO43-) during the sediments weathering
241
(Figure S4) supported this assumption, where the significant Ca mass loss from the ASCW6-HS
242
could be explained by calcium phosphate precipitation. This finding is consistent with Mehta et
243
al.,31 who found that, when simultaneously mixing of dissolved uranium, calcium, and phosphate
244
at neutral pH, U was structurally incorporated into a newly formed amorphous calcium 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
245
phosphate solid. However, it should be pointed out that the Ca-P phase is speculative, and further
246
studies on reliable chemical compositions are needed.
247
TRLIF spectroscopy. TRLIF analysis was conducted on the precipitated meta-ankoleite
248
and the fluorescence spectrum was compared with that of samples ASCW3-3 and ACSW6-3.
249
The emission fluorescence spectra for sample ASCW6-3 (Figure 2b) are the same as that for
250
meta-ankoleite (Figure 2a) with five characteristic peaks at 503, 525, 549, 575 and 602 nm. The
251
spectral similarity between the precipitated meta-ankoleite and ASCW6-3 indicates that the U
252
solid phase is dominated by meta-ankoleite mixed with ASCW6-weathered sediments, in
253
agreement with SEM/TEM-EDS analysis. The emission fluorescence spectrum for ASCW3-3
254
does not show the five characteristic peaks for meta-ankoleite and instead shows three peaks
255
shifted to longer wavelengths (Figure 2c), suggesting the presence of a different uranium phase.
256
This can be explained by the difference in solution composition as ASCW3 did not contain
257
added PO43-, thus it is not expected that uranyl phosphate phases, such as meta-ankoleite, would
258
precipitate. Comparison of the fluorescence spectrum for ASCW3-3 with those for well-
259
characterized standards 32-33 shows that the spectrum is most similar to that of a becquerelite
260
reference spectrum [Ca(UO2)6O4(OH)6·8(H2O)], which is structurally similar to K- and Na-
261
compreignacite (Figure 2c).34-35 The formation of compreignacite [K2(UO2)6O4(OH)6·7H2O] and
262
becquerelite is thermodynamically favorable at near-neutral pH and in the presence of sufficient
263
K and Ca, respectively.36 Due to the high concentration of K (100 mM) present in the ASCW
264
solutions, the formation of K-compreignacite was expected, and was observed by Kanematsu et
265
al.22 to precipitate from similar solutions at pH 5. Thus, additional EXAFS analyses were
266
undertaken to characterize the dominant uranium phases in the sample ASCW3-3. 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 30
Page 13 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
267
EXAFS analysis. EXAFS spectra were collected for the sample ASCW3-3 (HS
268
weathered in ASCW3 for 3 months) (Figure 3). The best linear combination fit of the spectrum
269
of ASCW3-3 (for uranium mineral EXAFS standards, see Table S2, Figure S5) indicates that K-
270
compreignacite is the dominant uranium phase (80%), but inclusion of the spectrum of a natural
271
compreignacite in the fit improves the result and suggests substitution of other cations in the
272
mineral structure (Table S3). Given both the TRLIF and EXAFS spectra for ASCW3-3, U is
273
present in a compreignacite-type phase that is mostly K but could contain some Ca (as indicated
274
by the TRLIF spectrum), which smears out the EXAFS features.22, 37 Substitution of different
275
cations into the interlayers between U(VI)-OH polyhedral sheets in compreignacite-group
276
minerals is common.37 Interestingly, despite the different U-bearing mineral phases formed in
277
solutions with or without PO43-, the amounts of U removed from the initial waste solutions were
278
similar (Table 1).
279
SPFT and column leaching experiments
280
SPFT leaching experiments. SPFT were performed with the four weathered HS samples
281
(ASCW3-3, ASCW3-15, ASCW6-3, and ASCW6-15), where a constant effluent solution pH of
282
~7.4 (Figure S6) was observed in all the samples. HS samples weathered with the same solution
283
but different weathering times showed similar leaching behaviors, but ASCW3- and ASCW6-
284
weathered HS exhibited different leaching trends (Figure 4a). For the HS weathered in ASCW3
285
solution (without PO43-) for 3 months or 15 months, a constant U concentration of ca. 47 µM/L
286
(= 11420 µg/L) was measured in the effluents after the first 20 mL (one cell solution volume).
287
Thus, despite different weathering times, the steady-state rate of U release was similar for both
288
flow-through cells. The nearly constant U release from these two ASCW3-weathered sediments 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
289
are consistent with a leaching process that is controlled by steady-state dissolution of U-bearing
290
solids (dominated by compreignacite in these samples). This behavior is contrast to previously
291
reported U release from contaminated Hanford sediments, which was characterized by a rapid
292
initial decrease in U solution concentration followed by a gradual decrease for the remainder of
293
the experiment24. The two-stage leaching behavior was consistent with leaching kinetics from
294
diffusion-limited intragrain regions within the lithic fragments1, 38-39. The behavior observed in
295
our experiments implies that U release from weathered HS is not diffusion-limited and suggests
296
that uranyl-bearing phases are widely distributed throughout the HS, rather than confined in
297
lithic fragments. This likely resulted from the smaller HS grain radius (silty sand) and shorter
298
weathering time (3-15 months) in this study compared to decades-weathered field samples.
299
Different U release behavior was observed for HS weathered in ASCW6 solution (with
300
PO43-) for 3 months or 15 months (sample ASCW6-3 and ASCW6-15) (Figure 4a). After a sharp
301
decrease in U concentration during the initial 20 mL of effluent, U concentrations gradually
302
increased over the course of the experiment until ~227 mL of leaching volume was reached. This
303
was followed by a slow release to nearly constant concentration for the remainder of the
304
experiment (Figure 4a). Given the constant temperature, pH, and flow conditions, a gradual
305
increase in U leaching would only occur as a function of specific geochemical processes
306
affecting the properties of the weathered sediments. Shi et al. 39 reported a similar leaching trend
307
in their column experiments to investigate the inhibitory effect of secondary phosphate
308
precipitation on U release from Hanford sediments. By comparing U leaching from Hanford 300
309
area sediment samples treated with 1 and 50 mM PO43- solutions, they concluded that the
310
inhibitory effect of PO43- decreased during U leaching if insufficient PO43- was provided. 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 30
Page 15 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
311
Similarly, uranium release from the ASCW6-weathered HS may have been inhibited by the
312
observed amorphous layer (see FIB-SEM/TEM-EDS section). In addition, considering the high
313
amount of phosphate (3 mM) applied in this weathering system, phosphate adsorption on solid
314
phase might occur 40-41, which can also contribute to the inhibitory effect. The rapidly P decrease
315
in the early stage of the column experiments (Figure 4c) might mainly result from the phosphate
316
desorption, but the dissolution of the possible amorphous Ca-P could not be ruled out. Thus, U
317
leaching from meta-ankoleite would be strongly impacted by the above inhibition effects,
318
resulting in a low initial U concentration in the effluent. Following the infiltration of PO43--free
319
BPW leachate (pH 7.28), it is likely that the inhibitory effects from the armoring layer and
320
phosphate-adsorption gradually decreased during leaching through dissolution and desorption
321
processes, eventually, a constant U concentration in the effluent from the dissolution of meta-
322
ankoleite would be expected in the later stages of the leaching experiment. Although the
323
concentration of U in the effluent did not reach steady state during the leaching experiment, the
324
decrease in slope of the U release after 227 mL of cumulative leached volume suggests that the
325
system is approaching an apparent steady state. In contrast to the ASCW3-weathered samples,
326
HS weathering time in ASCW6 solutions affected U release behavior. Uranium effluent
327
concentrations from the HS sample weathered for 3 months (ASCW6-3) were 2-3 times higher
328
than effluent concentrations for the HS sample weathered for 15 months (ASCW6-15). The
329
difference in leaching behavior may be due to an increase in particle size and crystallinity (i.e.,
330
Ostwald ripening) of the precipitated meta-ankoleite with increased weathering time.
331 332
Effluent U(VI) concentration from HS weathered in ASCW6 solution (with PO43-) were significantly lower (2-3 orders of magnitude) than those from HS weathered in ASCW3 solution 15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
333
(without PO43-) (Figure 4a). Cumulatively, more than 99% of the initial U mass remained in the
334
sample ASCW6-3 after greater than 400 mL of pore water leaching (~21 pore volumes), whereas
335
almost 25% of the U mass was removed from sample ASCW3-3 (Figure 4b). Clearly, the
336
different leaching behavior exhibited by these two weathered HS samples resulted from the
337
sequestration of U in distinct mineral phases that were formed during HS weathering by acidic
338
waste solutions with or without dissolved phosphate. The presence of phosphate exerts a strong
339
control over uranium mineralogy - the rapid precipitation of meta-ankoleite. Whereas in the
340
phosphate-free system, the main U-bearing mineral phases were compreignacite-type
341
oxyhydroxides. The insoluble U phosphate phase meta-ankoleite strongly retained U in the HS.
342
In contrast, the rate of U release was much higher from the dissolution of more soluble U-
343
bearing oxyhydroxide minerals in the phosphate-free system. The application of polyphosphate
344
for the remediation of U has been tested for uranium-contaminated Hanford sediments and
345
results showed that the long-term decrease in U leaching rate and mass were significant (~54%
346
to 1 year) 24. Similar to the findings in this study, phosphate treatment decreases U leaching by
347
forming Ca-P precipitates coated on uranium mineral surface phases, U adsorption to
348
precipitates, or formation of uranium-phosphate precipitates.24, 26, 42
349
The apparent steady-state U release rate was calculated using the effluent concentration
350
data through Equation 1. For sample ASCW3-3, the average U concentration when U release had
351
plateaued, after a cumulative flow-through volume of ca. 48 mL (see Figure 4a), were selected to
352
represent the steady-state U concentration. The rate of U leaching dominated by K-
353
compreignacite dissolution at steady state was 1.05E-10 mol g-1 s-1 using BPW (HCO3- = 0.3
354
mM). For sample ASCW6-3, U release plateaued later after the inhibitory effect (see Figure 4a), 16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 30
Page 17 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
355
so the average U concentration after ca. 227 mL leaching volume was used to estimate the
356
release rate. Uranium release rate from the meta-ankoleite dominated ASCW6-3 sample was
357
2.67E-12 mol g-1 s-1. It should be noted that this is a pseudo release rate since U leaching had not
358
reached steady-state during the ASCW6-3 leaching experiment. Above all, it is clear that the U
359
release rate for weathered samples dominated by meta-ankoleite are about 2 orders of magnitude
360
lower than those dominated by compreignacite. As far as we know, there is no reported U release
361
rate for meta-ankoleite (K-autunite), although the dissolution rates (in terms of mol m-2 s-1) for
362
synthesized Na/Ca-autunite has been reported under different geochemical conditions43-46.
363
Unfortunately, it is hard to determine the correct dissolution rates in terms of mol m-2 s-1 in this
364
study and compare with those literature values. Because the surface area contributions of U
365
minerals in the bulk weathered sediments were not easy to determine due to possibly the
366
dissolution of silt/clay particles in the acidic ASCW solutions. As described before, lower BET
367
specific surface areas were observed in the ASCW-weathered HS samples comparing to the
368
untreated HS even with neo-precipitated U phases.
369
Column leaching test. Similar to the SPFT results, much less U was released from the
370
meta-ankoleite-dominated sample (ASCW6-3-column) compared to the compreignacite-
371
dominated sample (ASCW3-3-column). Cumulatively, more than 99% of the initial U mass
372
remained in the ASCW6-3-column after ca.176 mL of pore water leaching (= 263 pore volumes),
373
whereas almost 13% of the U mass had been leached from the ASCW3-3-column after ca.163
374
mL (= 256 pore volume) (Figure 4d). A steady-state U effluent concentration of ca. 58 µM/L
375
(=13843 µg/L) was observed for ASCW3-3-column after 51 mL of leaching (Figure 4c). Despite
376
the different reaction times (> 5 days vs ~0.1 day of solution residence time) in the column and 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
377
SPFT systems, U release from the ASCW3-weathered HS columns reached steady state rapidly.
378
The estimated rates for the two systems were similar, with the rate for the ASCW3-3 column
379
(2.42E-10 mol g-1 s-1) within a factor of ca. 2 of the SPFT rate. However, in ASCW6-3-column,
380
the U concentration continued to increase gradually during the entire test (ca.176 mL BPW), and
381
thus no reliable release rate can be determined; U leaching was far from steady-state, possibly
382
due to less effective removal of the armoring layer (compared to SPFT, where more vigorous
383
leaching (ca.431 mL) was applied). Interestingly, release of U from ASCW6-3 reacted sediments
384
in SPFT or column gives similar calculated release rates. Using average U concentrations for
385
BPW effluent volumes of 60 – 176 mL, pseudo release rates of 4.29E-13 mol g-1 s-1 or 6.7E-13
386
mol g-1 s-1 were obtained for SPFT or column experiments, respectively.
387
Environmental Implication. Results of this study show that uranium mineralogy below the two
388
studied cribs could be controlled by the presence of phosphate through rapid precipitation of the
389
U-bearing phosphate mineral meta-ankoleite. When the U- and phosphate-containing acidic
390
aqueous waste was historically disposed in the cribs and subsequently released into the
391
subsurface, the waste stream could have reacted and precipitated mainly as meta-ankoleite or
392
similar phosphate phases in these legacy contaminated Hanford sediments. Future U speciation
393
study on field sediments should pay attention on uranium phosphate phases based on this
394
simulation results. The meta-ankoleite that formed under simulated field conditions was well
395
crystalline, and uranyl phosphate phases in general have low thermodynamic solubility compared
396
with uranyl oxyhydroxides and silicate phases22, which could limit dissolved U(VI)
397
concentrations in groundwater. The U mineralogy and release rates determined in this study are
398
important for the development of accurate U-release models at these sites. Due to the slow U 18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 30
Page 19 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
399
release rate of meta-ankoleite and low meteoric water infiltration at Hanford site, limited U
400
solubilization and downward migration is expected beneath the 216-U-8 and 216-U-12 crib sites.
401
However, the experimental effluent U concentrations of hundreds of µg per liter in this study is
402
still above the EPA regulatory standard (30 µg/L; National Primary Drinking Water Regulations,
403
2000)46. In addition, the phosphate concentrations in the historically-disposed waste streams are
404
not well known, thus some discharges may have contained high PO43- while others might have
405
been very low. In the absence of dissolved phosphate, U precipitates in uranyl oxyhydroxide
406
minerals with relatively high solubility and fast release rates.37 Thus, the reality in terms of U
407
retention would be somewhere between the two endmembers explored in this study. The
408
weathered sediments below the two studied cribs may still represent a U-source term and require
409
remediation to prevent contamination of the underlying groundwater.
410
Acknowledgements
411
This research was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through the
412
Subsurface Biogeochemical Research (SBR) program under grant numbers SBR-DE-
413
SC0006781. Portions of this research were carried out at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation
414
Lightsource, a national user facility operated by Stanford University on behalf of the U.S.
415
Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. A portion of this research was
416
supported by the Radioactive Waste Management Technology Program of the Korea Institute of
417
Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) granted financial resource from the
418
Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea (No.20141720100610). Pacific
419
Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is operated for the DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute
420
under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. The authors appreciate Dr. Carolyn I Pearce for 19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
421
technical review and discussion, and are grateful to Dr. Michele A. Conroy and Bruce Arey for
422
the SEM/TEM/EDS measurements. The XRD, SEM/TEM/EDS and TRLIF analyses were
423
performed in Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL). EMSL located at PNNL
424
is a national scientific user facility sponsored by the DOE’s Office of Biological and
425
Environmental Research.
426
Supporting Information Available
427
More details for solid characterization methods, pH buffering during sediment weathering, and
428
column leaching experiment are available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
429 430
431
432
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 30
Page 21 of 30
433
Environmental Science & Technology
Literature Cited
434 435 436
(1) Qafoku N.P., Zachara J.M., Liu C., Gassman P.L., Qafoku O.S., Smith S.C. Kinetic desorption and sorption of U(VI) during reactive transport in a contaminated Hanford sediment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 3157-3165.
437 438 439
(2) Liu C., Zachara J.M., Qafoku O., McKinley J.P., Heald S.M., Wang Z. Dissolution of uranyl microprecipitates from subsurface sediments at Hanford Site, USA. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2004, 68, 4519–4537.
440 441 442
(3) Chorover J., Choi S., Rotenberg P., Serne R.J., Rivera N., Strepka C., Thompson A., Muller K.T., O’Day P.A. Silicon control of strontium and cesium partitioning in hydroxide-weathered sediments. Geochim. Cosmochimi. Acta. 2008, 72, 2024−2047.
443 444
(4) Wang G., Um W. Mineral dissolution and secondary precipitation on quartz sand in simulated Hanford tank solution affecting subsurface porosity. J. Hydrol. 2012, 472-473, 159-168.
445 446
(5) Faulk D.A., and Hedges J.A. 216-U-8 crib and 216-U-12 crib vadose zone characterization sampling and analysis plan. 2010. DOE/RL-2009-94, revision 0.
447 448
(6) Qafoku N.P., Icenhower J.P. Interaction of aqueous U(VI) with soil minerals in slightly alkaline natural systems. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 355-380.
449 450 451
(7) Qafoku N.P., Kukkadapu R.K., Mckinley J.P., Arey B.W., Kelly S.D., Wang C., Resch C.T., Long P.E. Uranium in framboidal pyrite from a naturally bioreduced alluvial sediment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 8528-8534.
452 453
(8) Um W., Serne R.J., Krupka K.M. Surface complexation modeling of U(VI) sorption to Hanford sediment with varying geochemical conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 3587-3592.
454 455
(9) Um W., Wang Z., Serne R.J., Williams B.D., Brown C.F., Dodge C.J., Francis A.J. Uranium phases in contaminated sediments below Hanford’s U tank farm. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 4280-4286.
456 457
(10) Ilton E.S., Heald S.M., Smith S.C., Elbert D., Liu C. Reduction of uranyl in the interlayer region of low iron micas under anoxic and aerobic conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5003-5009.
458 459
(11) Ilton E.S., Qafoku N.P., Liu C., Moore D.A., Zachara J.M. Advective removal of intraparticle uranium from contaminated vadose sediments, Hanford, U.S. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 45, 1565-1571.
460 461
(12) Ilton E.S., Wang Z., Boily J.F., Qafoku O., Rosso K.M., Smith S.C. The effect of pH and time on the extractability and speciation of uranium (VI) sorbed to SiO2. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 6604-6611.
462 463
(13) Bickmore B.R., Nagy K.L., Young J.S., Drexler J.W. Nitrate-cancrinite precipitation on quartz sand in simulated Hanford tank solutions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4481−4486.
464 465
(14) Rod K.A., Um W., Flury M. Transport of strontium and cesium in simulated Hanford tank waste leachate through quartz sand under saturated and unsaturated flow. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 8089–8094.
466 467 468
(15) Szecsody J.E., Truex M.J., Qafoku N.P., Wellman D.M., Resch T., Zhong L. Influence of acidic and alkaline waste solution properties on uranium migration in subsurface sediments. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2013, 151, 155-175.
469 470
(16) Gartman B.N., Qafoku N.P., Szecsody J.E., Lukkadapu R.K., Wang Z., Wellman D.M., Truex M.J. Uranium fate in Hanford sediment altered by simulated acid waste solutions. Appl. Geochem. 2015, 63, 1-9.
471 472 473
(17) Catalano J.G., McKinley J.P., Zachara J.M., Heald S.M., Smith S.C., Brown G.E. Changes in uranium speciation through a depth sequence of contaminated Hanford sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 2517−2524.
474 475
(18) Stubbs J.E., Veblen L.A., Elbert D.C., Zachara J.M., Davis J.A., Veblen D.R. Newly recognized hosts for uranium in the Hanford Site vadose zone. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2009, 73, 1563–1576.
21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
476 477 478
(19) Singer D.M., Zachara J.M., Brown G.E. Uranium speciation as a function of depth in contaminated Hanford sediments – A Micro-XRF, Micro-XRD, and Micro- and Bulk-XAFS study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 630−636.
479 480 481
(20) Arai Y., Marcus M.A., Tamura N., Dais J.A., Zachara J.M. Spectroscopic evidence for uranium bearing precipitates in vadose zone sediments at the Hanford 300-Area Site. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 4633−4639.
482 483 484
(21) McKinley J.P., Zachara J.M., Wan J., McCready D.E., Heald S.M. Geochemical controls on contaminant uranium in vadose zone Hanford formation sediments at the 200 Area and 300 Area, Hanford Site, Washington. VZJ, 2007, 6, 1004−1017.
485 486
(22) Kanematsu M., Perdrial N., Um W., Chorover J., O’Day P.A. Influence of phosphate and silica on U(VI) precipitation from acidic and neutralized waste waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014. 48, 6097-6106.
487 488
(23) Mehta V.S., Maillot F., Wang Z., Catalano J.G. and Giammar D.E. Effect of co-solutes on the products and solubility of uranium (VI) precipitated with phosphate. Chem. Geol. 2014. 364, 66– 75.
489 490 491
(24) Szecsody J.E., Zhong L., Oostrom M., Vermeul V.R., Fruchter J.S., Williams M.D. Use of Polyphosphate to Decrease Uranium Leaching in Hanford 300 Area Smear Zone Sediment. PNNL-21733; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Richland, WA, 2012.
492 493 494
(25) Wellman D.M, Glovack J.N., Parker K., Richards E.L., Pierce E.M. Sequestration and retention of uranium (VI) in the presence of hydroxylapatite under dynamic geochemical conditions. Envir. Chem. 2008, 5, 40– 50.
495 496 497
(26) Wellman D.M, Fruchter J.S., Vermeul V.R., Richards E., Jansik D.P., Edge E. Evaluation of the efficacy of polyphosphate remediation technology: Direct and indirect remediation of uranium under alkaline conditions.” Technol. and Innov. 2011, 13, 151–164.
498 499 500 501
(27) Bovaird C.C., Rod K., Wellman D.M., Strandquist S.C. Supplemental Laboratory Development of Polyphosphate Remediation Technology for In Situ Treatment of Uranium Contamination in the Vadose Zone and Periodically Re-wetted Zone. PNNL-SA-76114, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington. 2010.
502 503 504 505 506
(28) Serne R.J., Bjornstad B.N., Schaef H.T., Williams B.A., Lanigan D.C., Horton D.G., Clayton R.E., Mitroshkov A.V., LeGore V.L., O’Hara M.J., Brown C.F., Parker K.E., Kutnyyakov I.V., Serne J.N., Last G.V., Smith S.C., Lindenmeier C.W., Zachara J.M., Burke D.S. Characterization of Vadose Zone Sediment: Uncontaminated RCRA Borehole Core Samples and Composite Samples. PNNL-13757-1, Rev.1. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Richland, WA, 2008.
507 508
(29) Cantrell K.J., Um W., Williams B.D., Bowden M.E., Gartman B., Lukens W.W., Buck E.C., MAusolf E.J. Chemical stabilization of Hanford Tank residual waste. J. Nucl. Mater. 2014, 446, 246-256.
509 510
(30) Um W., Serne R.J., Brown C.F., Rod K.A. Uranium (VI) sorption on iron oxides in Hanford Site sediment: Application of a surface complexation model. Appl. Geochem.. 2008, 23, 2649-2657.
511 512 513
(31) Mehta V.S., Maillot F., Wang Z., Catalano J.G., Giammar D.E. Effects of reaction pathway on the extent and mechanism of uranium (VI) immobilization with calcium and phosphate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 3128-3136.
514 515 516
(32) Wang Z., Zachara J.M., Gassman P.L., Liu C., Qafoku O., Tantasee W., Catalano J.G. Fluorescence spectroscopy of U(VI)-silicates and U(VI)-contaminated Hanford sediment. Geochim. Cosmochimi. Acta 2005, 69, 1391-1403.
517 518 519
(33) Wang Z., Zachara J.M., Liu C., Gassman P.L., Felmy A.R., Clark S.B. A cryogenic fluorescence spectroscopic study of uranyl carbonate, phosphate and oxyhydroxide minerals. Radiochim. Acta. 2008, 96, 591-598.
520
(34) Burns P.C. The structure of compreignacite, K2[(UO2)3O2(OH)3]2(H2O)7. Can. Miner. 1998, 36, 1061-1067.
22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 30
Page 23 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
521 522
(35) Burns P.C., Li Y. The structures of becquerelite and Sr-exchanged becquerelite. Am. Miner. 2002, 87, 550557.
523 524
(36) Gorman-Lewis D., Burns P.C., Fein J.B. Review of uranyl mineral solubility measurements. J. Chem. Thermodynamics. 2008, 40, 335-352.
525 526
(37) Reinoso-Maset E., Steefel C.I., Um W., Chorover J., O’Day P.A. Rates and mechanisms of uranyl oxyhydroxide mineral dissolution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2017, 207, 298-321.
527 528
(38) Liu C., Zachara J.M., Yantasee W., Majors P.D., McKinley J.P. Microscopic reactive diffusion of uranium in the contaminated sediments at Hanford, United States. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42. 1-15.
529 530 531
(39) Shi Z., Liu C., Zachara J.M., Wang Z., Deng B. Inhibition effect of secondary phosphate mineral precipitation on uranium release from contaminated sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 83448349.
532 533
(40) Stollenwerk K.G. Simulation of phosphate transport in sewage-contaminated groundwater, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Appl. Geochem. 1996, 317-324.
534 535 536 537
(41) Szecsody J.E., Rockhold M.L., Oostrom M., Moore R.C., Burns C.A., Williams M.D., Zhong L., Fruchter J.S., McKinley J.P., Vermeul V.R., Covert M.T., Wietsma T.W., Breshears A.T., Garcia B.J. Sequestration of Sr-90 subsurface contamination in the Hanford 100-N Area by surface infiltration of a Ca-citratephosphate solution. PNNL-18303. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Richland, WA, 2009.
538 539 540
(42) Troyer L.D., Maillot F., Wang Z., Wang Z., Mehta V.S., Giammar D.E., Catalano J.G. Effect of phosphate on U(VI) sorption montmorillonite: Ternary complexation and precipitation barriers. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2016, 175, 86-99.
541 542 543
(43) Wellman, D.M., Icenhower, J.P., Gamerdinger, A.P., Forrester, S.W. Effects of pH, temperature and aqueous organic material on the dissolution kinetics of metaautunite minerals, (Na, Ca)2 − 1[(UO2)(PO4)]2 · 3H2O. Am. Mineral. 2006, 91, 143.
544 545 546
(44) Wellman, D.M., Gunderson, K.M., Icenhower, J.P., Forrester, S.W. Dissolution kinetics of synthetic and natural meta-autunite minerals, X3–n (n)+ [(UO2)(PO4)]2•xH2O, under acidic conditions. Geochem. Geophys. 2007, 8, 16.
547 548 549
(45) Gudavalli R.K.P., Katsenovich Y.P., Wellman D.W., Idarraga M., Lagos L.E., Tansel B. Comparison of kinetic rate law parameters for the dissolution of natural and synthetic autunite in the presence of aqueous biocarbonate ions. Chem. Geol. 2013, 351, 299-309.
550
(46) National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, 2000. Radionuclides, Final Rule. Fed. Regist. 65, 76707.
551 552
23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
553 554
Page 24 of 30
Table 1. Summary of the acidic waste solution, weathered Hanford Fine Sands (HS), U loading, and BET specific surface area measured on sediments after weathering. Sample ID
PO43–
ASCW - HS weathering time [month]
U concentration in weathered samples [mg/g]
Specific surface area [m2/g]
ASCW3-3
-
3
7.24±0.01
6.04
ASCW3-15
-
15
ASCW6-3
+
3
ASCW6-15
+
15
Metaankoleite
+
Rapidly homogeneous precipitate from solution ASCW6 (with PO43–)
9.19 7.09±0.04
8.37 8.58
431±10
555 556 557 558
24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
559
Figure Captions
560 561 562
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffractogram of the homogeneous precipitate filtered out of acidic waste solution ASCW6 compared with lines for reference meta-ankoleite; (b) TEM-EDS mapping of sample ASCW6-3 showing association of U with P, K, and Ca, but less with Si and Al.
563 564
Figure 2. TRLIF spectra of (a) meta-ankoleite, (b) ASCW6-3, and (c) ASCW3-3 with Uphosphate references.
565 566 567
Figure 3. Linear combination (LC) fits (blue dashed lines) to the U LIII-EXAFS spectra (black solid lines) of ASCW3-3 samples, and deconvolution of contribution from reference compound spectra (pointed and dash-pointed lines). Numerical values are given in Table S3.
568 569 570 571
Figure 4. SPFT (top: a, b) and column (bottom: c, d) leaching test results on the ASCW solutionweathered sediments; (left) Effluent uranium concentrations as a function of cumulative leached fluid volume, and (right) remaining uranium mass as a function of leached fluid volume. The black circle in (c) indicates P concentrations in the ASCW6-3-column effluent.
25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
572
573 574 575 576
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffractogram of the homogeneous precipitate filtered out of acidic waste solution ASCW6 compared with lines for reference meta-ankoleite; (b) TEM-EDS mapping of sample ASCW6-3 showing association of U with P, K, and Ca, but less with Si and Al.
577 578 579
26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 30
Page 27 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
(a) 6
8x10 Meta-AnKoleite λex=415 nm delay 207.5-707.5 µs gatewidth 100 µs
4
(b)
6
F12s22_pdw_01 F12s22_pdw_02 F12s22_pdw_03 F12s22_pdw_04 F12s22_pdw_05 F12s22_pdw_06
6
Intensity
Intensity
6x10
F12s11_pdw_01 F12s11_pdw_02 F12s11_pdw_03 F12s11_pdw_04 F12s11_pdw_05 F12s11_pdw_06
U(VI) in ASCW6-HS λex=415 nm delay 207.5-707.5 µs gatewidth 100 µs
4
2 2
400
450
500
550
600
650
400
450
Wavelength (nm)
580
500
550
600
650
Wavelength (nm)
Meta_ankoleite ASCW3-HS becquerelite_r2 Compregnacite Na_Compregnacite schoepite_r2 Cahill_Schoepite
(c)
Normalized Intensity
8x10
6
6
4
2
0 500
581 582 583
550
600
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 2. TRLIF fluorescence spectra of (a) meta-ankoleite, (b) ASCW6-3, and (c) ASCW3-3 with U-phosphate references.
584
27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
585 586 587 588
Figure 3. Linear combination fits (blue dashed lines) to the U LIII-EXAFS spectra (black solid lines) of ASCW3-3 sample, and deconvolution of contribution from reference compound spectra (pointed and dash-pointed lines). Numerical values are given in Table S3.
589 590 591 592
28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 30
Page 29 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
100
(a) 10.00
1.00
0.10 ASCW3-3 ASCW6-3
ASCW3-15 ASCW6-15
Remaining U mass [%]
U concentration [µM/L]
100.00
0.01
90 85 80 ASCW3-3 ASCW6-3
75 70
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
Cumulative Flow-Through Volume [mL]
593 10.00
1000 800
1.00 600 ASCW3-3-column
0.10
400
ASCW6-3-column ASCW6-3-column-P
0.01
200
Remaining U mass [%]
1200
100
200
300
400
300
400
500
(d) 95 90 85 80 ASCW3-3-column
75
ASCW6-3-column
0 0
200
100
1400
(c)
100
Cumulative Flow-Through Volume [mL]
P concentration [µM/L]
U concentration [µM/L]
100.00
594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602
(b)
95
70
500
0
Cumulative Flow-Through Volume [mL]
100
200
300
400
500
Cumulative Flow-Through Volume [mL]
Figure 4. SPFT (top: a, b) and column (bottom: c, d) leaching test results on the ASCW solutionweathered sediments; (left) Effluent uranium concentrations as a function of cumulative leached fluid volume, and (right) remaining uranium mass as a function of leached fluid volume. The black circle in (c) indicates P concentrations in the ASCW6-3-column effluent.
29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
603
TOC
604
605 606
30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 30