Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF PITTSBURGH
Article
Edible Flowers: A Rich Source of Phytochemicals with Antioxidant and Hypoglycaemic Activity Monica Rosa Loizzo, Alessandro Pugliese, Marco Bonesi, Maria Concetta Tenuta, Francesco Menichini, Jianbo Xiao, and Rosa Tundis J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03092 • Publication Date (Web): 13 Aug 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 18, 2015
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF PITTSBURGH
and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Phytochemical characterization (HPLC, GC, GC-MS
Malva sylvestris
Eight edible flowers
Antioxidant in vitro properties
-Amylase and -glucosidase inhibitory activity
Sambucus nigra
Hedysarum coronarium
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 2 of 28
1
Edible Flowers: A Rich Source of Phytochemicals with Antioxidant and
2
Hypoglycaemic Properties
3 4
Monica Rosa Loizzoa, Alessandro Puglieseb, Marco Bonesia, Maria Concetta Tenutaa, Francesco
5
Menichinia, Jianbo Xiaoc, Rosa Tundisa,*
6 7
a
8
b
9
c
10
Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutrition Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy
Department of Food Science, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze, 43124 Parma, Italy
Research Center of Bio-separation Engineering Technology, Anhui Institute of Applied Technology, Hefei, Anhui,
230031, China; Institut für Pharmazie und Lebensmittelchemie, Universität Würzburg, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
11 12 13
Running title
14
Edible flowers: chemistry and bioactivity.
15 16
Corresponding author. Address: Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutrition Sciences,
17
University of Calabria, I-87036 Rende (CS), Italy. Phone: +39 984 493246; Fax: +39 984 493107;
18
E-mail:
[email protected] (R. Tundis)
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
27
ABSTRACT: Edible flowers are receiving renewed interest as rich sources of bioactive
28
compounds. Ethanol extracts of eight edible flowers were phytochemically characterized and
29
investigated for their bioactivity. Rutin, quercetin, luteolin, kaempferol, and myricetin were selected
30
as standards and quantified by HPLC. The fatty acids profile was analysed by GC and GC-MS.
31
Antioxidant properties were evaluated by using different in vitro tests. The hypoglycaemic effects
32
were investigated via the inhibition of -amylase and -glucosidase. S. nigra exhibited the highest
33
radical scavenging activity (IC50 of 1.4 g/mL), followed by H. coronarium (IC50 of 1.6 g/mL).
34
Both species contained high quercetin and rutin content. S. nigra extract exerted the highest activity
35
in preventing lipid oxidation. M. sylvestris extract inhibited both-amylase and -glucosidase with
36
IC50 values of 7.8 and 11.3 g/mL, respectively. These findings support the consumption of edible
37
flowers as functional foods and their use as sources of natural antioxidants by food industry.
38 39
Keywords: edible flowers; flavonoids; fatty acids; antioxidant activity; carbohydrate hydrolysing
40
enzymes.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
41
Page 4 of 28
INTRODUCTION
42
The use of edible flowers is becoming popular as evidenced by an increase in the number of
43
articles regarding this topic.1 Flowers have traditionally been used in cooking in various cultures,
44
such as European and Asian (Victorian English, east Indians etc.) to improve appearance (color,
45
odor and flavour), and nutritive value of meals. Flowers are served as a salad, to prepare cakes and
46
drinks or as a side dish.2,3
47
Flowers are rich in a great variety of natural antioxidants including flavonoids, anthocyanin
48
and many other phenolic compounds.4 Epidemiological data has shown that a diet rich in
49
antioxidant could prevent chronic diseases such as diabetes type II, cancer, cardiovascular and
50
neurodegenerative disorders. During metabolism reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other free
51
radicals are generated. These radicals are normally inactivated by endogenous antioxidant system.
52
However, in particular conditions such as consequence of lifestyle or pathological situations, these
53
free radicals could be accumulated generating the oxidative stress.5
54
Diabetes has emerged as a major threat to health worldwide. Type 2 diabetes or non-insulin-
55
dependent or adult-onset results from the body’s ineffective use of insulin. Type 2 diabetes
56
comprises 90% of people with diabetes around the world, and is largely the result of excess body
57
weight.6 There is growing evidence that excess generation of ROS, largely due to hyperglycaemia
58
as a consequence of glycation reaction, causes oxidative stress in a variety of tissues. In type 2
59
diabetic patients, oxidative stress is closely associated with chronic inflammation that may play a
60
role in the development of complications in diabetes.7 -Amylase breaks down large insoluble
61
starch molecules into absorbable molecules. This enzyme is found in the pancreatic juice and saliva.
62
On the other hand, -glucosidase in the mucosal brush border of the small intestine catalyses
63
the end step of digestion of starch and disaccharides that are abundant in the human diet.8 In order
64
to reduce the levels of postprandial hyperglycaemia -amylase and -glucosidase inhibitors could
65
be used. Several inhibitors of the carbohydrate hydrolysing enzyme have been isolated from plants
66
to serve as an alternative drug with increased potency and lesser adverse effects than existing ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
67
synthetic drugs such as acarbose.9 Diabetes seems to influence the cholesterol absorption efficiency
68
and synthesis with the respective non diabetic state. For this reason diabetic patients are often
69
affected by high levels of cholesterol in the blood.10
70
The objectives of this study are as follows: a) to investigate the phytochemicals content
71
(phenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, anthocyanins, fatty acids) of different edible flowers (Anchusa
72
azurea, Capparis spinosa, Cichorium intybus, Hedysarum coronarium, Malva sylvestris, Robinia
73
pseudoacacia, Rosmarinus officinalis and Sambucus nigra) largely consumed in Italy; b) to
74
evaluate the content of flavonoids namely rutin, quercetin, luteolin, kaempferol, and myricetin as
75
standards; c) to study their potential antioxidant activities by using different in vitro assays namely
76
DPPH, ABTS, FRAP and -carotene bleaching tests; d) to investigate the hypoglycaemic activity
77
through the inhibition of carbohydrate -hydrolysing enzymes -amylase and -glucosidase.
78 79
MATERIALS AND METHODS
80
Chemicals and Reagents. Potato starch, sodium phosphate, sodium chloride, -amylase from
81
porcine pancreas (EC 3.2.1.1), -glucosidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (EC 3.2.1.20),
82
maltose, sodium acetate, potassium hydrogen carbonate, sodium potassium tartrate, 3,5-
83
dinitrosalicylic acid, o-Dianisidine Color Reagent (DIAN), PGO Enzymes Solution (PGO), acetic
84
acid, perchloric acid, basic bismuth nitrate, potassium iodide, phosphoric acid, sodium hydroxyde,
85
HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), sodium phosphate monobasic,
86
chlorogenic acid, quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, rutin, myricetin, anhydrous sodium sulfate,
87
sodium phosphate buffer, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Folin-Ciocalteau reagent, Tween
88
20,
89
ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) solution, 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-
90
carboxylic acid (Trolox), potassium persulphate, -carotene, Tween 20, linoleic acid, FeCl3, FeSO4,
91
butylated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), hydroxytoluene (BHT), ascorbic acid, propyl gallate,
92
cyanidin-3-glucoside, methaphosphoric acid, 2,6-dichloroindophenol, cholesterol, and 5-
tripyridyltriazine
(TPTZ),
sodium
potassium
tartrate
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
tetrahydrate,
2,2'-azino-bis(3-
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 28
93
cholestane were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich S.p.a. (Milan, Italy). Acarbose from Actinoplanes
94
sp. was obtained from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany). Solvents of analytical grade were obtained
95
from VWR International s.r.l. (Milan, Italy).
96 97
Plant Material and Extraction Procedure. Flowers of Sambucus nigra L. Hedysarum
98
coronarium L., Cichorium intybus L., Malva sylvestris L., Anchusa azurea Mill., Capparis spinosa
99
L., Robinia pseudoacacia L., and Rosmarinus officinalis L. were collected in Cosenza province
100
(Calabria, Italy) during spring 2013. Flowers were cleaned by using distilled water; the petals are
101
separated and kept at room temperature to drain. The petals are then exhaustively extracted by
102
absolute ethanol at room temperature (48 h) for 3 times. The ethanol solutions are pooled together
103
and evaporated to dryness using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure to obtain the total
104
extract.
105 106
Total Phenolic Content. The total phenolic content was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteau
107
method.11 Extract was mixed with 0.2 mL Folin-Ciocalteau reagent, 2 mL of water and 1 mL of
108
15% Na2CO3. After 2 h incubation at 25°C the absorbance was measured at 765 nm using a UV-Vis
109
Jenway 6003 spectrophotometer. The total phenolic content was expressed as mg of chlorogenic
110
acid equivalents per g of dry extract.
111 112
Total Flavonoid Content. The flavonoids content was determined as previously described.12
113
Extract was added to 4 mL of distilled water. At zero time, 0.3 mL of 5% (w/v) sodium nitrite
114
was added to the flask. After 5 min, 0.6 mL of 10% (w/v) AlCl3 was added, and then at 6 min 2 mL
115
of 1 M NaOH were also added to the mixture, followed by the addition of 2.1 mL distilled water.
116
Absorbance was read at 510 nm. The levels of total flavonoid content were expressed as mg of
117
quercetin equivalents per g of dry extract.
118 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
119 120
Total Antocyanin Content. Total monomeric anthocyanin content was determined using the
121
pH-differential method13 with slight modifications. Briefly, 0.5 mL of the extract (1.5 mg/mL in
122
water) was mixed with a) 3.5 mL of potassium chloride buffer (0.025 M, pH 1); b) 3.5 mL of
123
sodium acetate buffer (0.025 M, pH 4.5). After 15 min, the raw absorbance of each solution was
124
measured at 510 and 700 nm. The absorbance difference was calculated as follow: A= [(A510A700)
125
pH 1.0 (A510A700) pH 4.5]. The anthocyanin content was calculated using the molar absorptivity
126
() and molecular weights (MW) of cyanidin-3-glucoside (= 26,900; MW= 449.2). The
127
concentration of monomeric anthocyanin was: (Absorbance × MW × Dilution Factor × 1000)/( ×
128
1). Results are expressed as mg of cyanidin 3-glucoside equivalents/g of extract.
129 130
Total Carotenoid Content. The total carotenoid content was measured at 450 nm.11 Extracts
131
were added to 0.5 mL of 5% NaCl, vortexed for 30 s and centrifuged for 10 min at 4500 rpm. The
132
supernatant (100 L) was diluted with 0.9 mL of n-hexane and measured at 460 nm. -Carotene
133
was used as a standard. The total carotenoids contents were determined in triplicate and expressed
134
as -carotene equivalents in mg per g of dry extract.
135 136
HPLC analysis. Rutin, quercetin, luteolin, kaempferol, and myricetin were quantified by HPLC.
137
Analyses were carried out in an HPLC system HP 1100 equipped with a pump, UV-vis detector
138
(280 nm), column oven, injector and a C18 RP column (Phenomenex Luna 5 μm C18, 250 × 4.60
139
mm). Water/formic acid (0.1%) (A) and methanol (B) were used as mobile phase as follows: 3 min
140
100% A; 10 min 80% A; 60 min 100% B; 70 min 100% A). A flow rate of 1 mL/min was applied.
141
The content was calculated from the integrated peak area of the extract and the corresponding
142
standard.
143
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 28
144
Fatty Acids Profile. Fatty acids were determined by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
145
(GC-MS) using a Hewlett-Packard 6890 gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-5 column and
146
interfaced with a Hewlett Packard 5973 Mass Selective. Ionization of the sample components was
147
performed in electron impact mode (EI, 70 eV). The carrier gas was helium and the oven
148
temperature program was as follows: the initial temperature was 50 °C (for 5 min), then a
149
13 °C/min ramp to 250 °C and held for 10 min. Fatty acids were identified by comparison of their
150
mass spectra with those of standards and those stored in Wiley 138 and NIST 98 libraries. Results
151
were expressed in relative percentage of each fatty acid.
152 153
DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity Assay. DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined
154
according to the technique previously described.14 A mixture of DPPH methanol solution (1.0 × 10-
155
4
156
The bleaching of DPPH was determined by measuring the absorbance at 517 nm (UV-Vis Jenway
157
6003 spectrophotometer). The DPPH radicals scavenging activity was calculated as follows:
158
[(A0A1/A0) × 100], where A0 is the absorbance of the control and A1 is the absorbance in the
159
presence of the sample. Ascorbic acid was used as positive control.
M) and flower extracts (1-1000 g/mL in methanol) was prepared and kept in the dark for 30 min.
160 161
ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity Assay. ABTS radical cation (ABTS+) solution was mixed
162
with potassium persulphate and left in the dark for 12 h before use.14 The ABTS+ solution was
163
diluted with methanol to an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.05 at 734 nm. After addition of extract (1-1000
164
g/mL in methanol) to the ABTS+ solution, absorbance was measured after 6 min. Ascorbic acid
165
was used as positive control.
166 167
-Carotene Bleaching Test. The -carotene bleaching test was done following the procedure
168
previously describe.14 Briefly, -carotene solution was added to linoleic acid and 100% Tween 20.
169
The emulsion was mixed with 200 L of samples (1-1000 g/mL in methanol). The tubes were ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
170
placed at 45 °C in a water bath. The absorbance was measured at 470 nm against a blank at t= 0, 30
171
and 60 min. Propyl gallate was used as positive control.
172 173
Ferric Reducing Activity Power (FRAP) Assay. The FRAP test is based on the redox reaction
174
that involves TPTZ (2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine)-Fe3+ complex.15 FRAP reagent was prepared by
175
mixing 10 mM TPTZ solution with 40 mM HCl, 20 mM FeCl3 and 0.3 M acetate buffer. The
176
absorption was measured at 595 nm. The FRAP value represents the ratio between the slope of the
177
linear plot for reducing Fe3+-TPTZ reagent by extracts compared to the slope of the plot for FeSO4.
178
Extracts were dissolved in methanol and tested at 2.5 mg/mL. BHT was used as positive control.
179 180
Carbohydrate-hydrolysing Enzymes Inhibitory Activity. The -amylase and -glucosidase
181
inhibition assays were performed using the method previously described.16 Acarbose was used as
182
positive control. In -amylase inhibition test a starch solution (0.5% w/v) was obtained by stirring
183
potato starch in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer with 6.7 mM sodium chloride. The enzyme
184
solution was prepared by mixing 25.3 mg of -amylase from porcine pancreas (EC 3.2.1.1) (10
185
units/mg) in 100 mL of cold distilled water. A mixture of enzyme solution and samples (1-1000
186
g/mL in DMSO) was prepared and added to starch solution at 25 °C for 5 min. The generation of
187
maltose was quantified using 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid at 540 nm.
188
In -glucosidase inhibition test a maltose solution (4% w/v) was prepared by dissolving 12 g of
189
maltose in 300 mL buffer of 50 mM sodium acetate. The enzyme solution was prepared by mixing
190
1 mg of -glucosidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (EC 3.2.1.20) (10 units/mg) in 10 mL of ice-
191
cold distilled water. Samples were dissolved in DMSO to give a final concentration ranging from 1
192
to 1000 g/mL. Both control and samples were mixed to a maltose solution for 5 min at 37 °C.
193
Then, -glucosidase solution was added and left for incubation at 37 °C for 30 min. Perchloric acid
194
solution was used to stop reaction. The generation of glucose was quantified by the reduction of
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
195
Page 10 of 28
DIAN. The absorbance was measured at 500 nm.
196
Statistical Analysis. The concentration giving 50% inhibition (IC50) was calculated by nonlinear
197
regression with the use of Prism GraphPad Prism version 4.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software,
198
San Diego, CA, USA). The dose-response curve was obtained by plotting the percentage inhibition
199
versus concentration. Differences within and between groups were evaluated by one-way analysis
200
of variance test (ANOVA) followed by a multicomparison Dunnett’s test compared with the
201
positive controls.
202 203
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
204
Phytochemicals profile. Eight edible flowers collected in Calabria (Italy) were investigated. The
205
extraction yield, common names and colour, food and traditional medicinal use are presented in
206
Table 1. Phytochemicals are a large group of plant-derived compounds hypothesized to be
207
responsible for much of the disease protection conferred from diets. Among them phenolic
208
compounds are attracting the attention of scientists because of their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory,
209
anti-mutagenic, and anti-carcinogenic properties and their capacity to modulate some key cellular
210
enzyme functions.17-19 The total phenolic content determined in this work was expressed in terms of
211
mg chlorogenic acid/g dry extract. The results showed that among eight analysed edible flowers S.
212
nigra exhibited the highest content with 228.5 mg chlorogenic acid/g dry extract. Significative
213
values were also recorded for R. officinalis and C. intybus with 48.8 and 43.2 mg chlorogenic acid/g
214
dry extract. A lower total flavonoid content than the total phenolic content was found amongst
215
varieties of edible flowers, this condition is due to the presence of non-flavonoid phenolic
216
compounds in plants.20 Correlation analysis evidenced a positive correlation between the total
217
phenolic content and the total flavonoid content in all investigated species (r2= 0.771).
218
HPLC was used to quantify some flavonoids of edible flowers extracts, namely rutin, myricetin,
219
luteolin, quercetin and kaempferol. Except for A. azurea and M. sylvestris, rutin was the flavonoid
220
most representative in R. pseudoacacia (28.4 mg/g), H. coronarium (28.2 mg/g dry), S. nigra (23.7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
221
mg/g) and C. intybus (20.3 mg/g) (Table 2). Qurcetin was identified only in C. spinosa, H.
222
coronarium and S. nigra in which its value (23.6 mg/g) is comparable to rutin. Luteolin was
223
revealed only in M. sylvestris flowers with value of 1.5 mg/g. All flower extracts are characterized
224
by the presence of kaempferol (0.5-4.2 mg/g) and myricetin (0.6-3.5 mg/g dry extract) with the
225
exception of C. intybus and H. coronarium, respectively.
226
Recently, the flavonoids profile of ten common edible flowers from China was evaluated.21
227
Agreed with our results the rutin and the quercetin are the main compounds. Anthocyanins have
228
been categorized as the largest group of water-soluble pigments present in flowers.22 These natural
229
pigments are a great interest in the food industry, due to their attractive colours and beneficial
230
health effects, including anti-inflammatory, anti-artherogenic, anticancer, antidiabetic, and
231
antioxidant activities.23 Humans consume a considerable amount of anthocyanin from plant-based
232
food sources in daily life. C. spinosa showed the highest total anthocyanins content of 5.4 mg/g,
233
followed by A. azurea (3.7 mg/g) and R. pseudoacacia (3.6 mg/g) (Table 2). M. sylvestris is
234
characterized by the lower anthocyanins content (0.3 mg of cyaniding-3-glucoside equivalents/g).
235
However, it is important to consider that anthocyanins often undergo degradative reactions during
236
processing and storage.13
237
Epidemiological study shows that the consumption of a carotenoids rich diet has been
238
correlated with a lower risk for several diseases. Their beneficial effects are thought to be due to
239
their role as antioxidants. The carotenoids that have been most studied in this regard are -carotene,
240
lycopene, lutein, and zeaxanthin.24 C. spinosa and A. azurea showed the highest total carotenoids
241
content with values of 3.4 and 3.0 mg/g, followed by R. pseudoacacia (2.8 mg/g).
242
The results for fatty acid composition, total saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty
243
acids (MUFA), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) of edible flower extracts are reported in
244
Table 3. All samples are characterized by a content of fatty acids in the order SFA > PUFA >
245
MUFA. The main SFA was palmitic acid (C16:0) (7.1-25.7% for R. officinalis and C. spinosa,
246
respectively). ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 12 of 28
247
Linoleic acid and -linolenic acid are the two PUFAs identified in all flowers extracts. The
248
extract of A. azurea is the major source of PUFAs with a total percentage of 13.3% compared to the
249
other extracts (1.2-3.9%).
250 251
Antioxidant activity. Considering that plant foods contain many different classes and types of
252
antioxidants, the use of different methods that differ in their chemistry and in the way end points
253
was recommended.25 For this reason in this study we applied different procedures, namely DPPH,
254
ABTS, FRAP, and-carotene bleaching test. DPPH• is a stable free radical widely used as a method
255
for studying the free radical-scavenging activity of natural antioxidants.26 The colour changes from
256
purple to yellow and its absorbance decreases. Results of the DPPH• radical scavenging activity are
257
given in Table 4. Both S. nigra and H. coronarium exhibited the highest radical scavenging activity
258
with IC50 value of 1.4 g/mL followed by A. azurea and R. officinalis with IC50 values of 3.7 and
259
4.7 g/mL, respectively (Figure 1). All these values are lower than those reported for positive
260
control ascorbic acid (IC50 value of 5.0 g/mL). Interesting results were also obtained with C.
261
intybus flowers (IC50 value of 7.4 g/mL). The scavenging capacities of the various edible flowers
262
extracts for the ABTS+• radical were measured and compared. S. nigra and C. intybus showed the
263
highest ABTS+• radical scavenging activity with IC50 values of 11.4 and 16.2 g/mL, respectively.
264
Significant scavenging activity was also found with R. officinalis (IC50 value of 20.8 g/mL).
265
In -carotene bleaching test the presence of extracts with antioxidant activity can hinder the
266
extent of -carotene bleaching by neutralizing the linoleate free radical and other free radicals
267
formed in the model.27 S. nigra, A. azurea and R. officinalis exerted the highest activity with IC50
268
values of 2.2, 3.5 and 3.5 g/mL at 30 min of incubation and values of 6.1, 7.1 and 4.7 g/mL at 60
269
min of incubation, respectively (Figure 2). A promising inhibition of lipid peroxidation was also
270
found in M. officinalis that showed IC50 values of 8.5 and 10.5 g/mL at 30 and 60 minutes of
271
incubation, respectively. The correlation analysis revealed that rutin was positively correlated with
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
272
-carotene bleaching test (r2= 0.0952 at 30 min incubation and r2 = 0.1406 at 60 min of incubation).
273
The FRAP assay measures the reducing potential of phytonutrients. Generally, the reducing
274
properties are associated with the presence of compounds, which exert their action by breaking the
275
free radical chain through donating a hydrogen atom.28 The ferric reducing ability of edible flower
276
extracts expressed as FRAP values M Fe(II)/g are shown in Table 4. S. nigra flower extract had
277
the highest FRAP value of 83.8 M Fe(II)/g followed by R. officinalis with FRAP value of 59.9 M
278
Fe(II)/g. These values are better than those found with the positive control BHT (63.2 M Fe(II)/g).
279
Correlation analysis evidenced a positive correlation between the total phenolic content FRAP test
280
in all investigated species (r2= 0.442). In particular, both quercetin and rutin are positively
281
correlated with FRAP assay.
282
Based on the increase in the consumption of flowers, researchers have intensified their studies to
283
assess the phytochemical profile and bioactivity with particular reference to antioxidant
284
properties.29 The flowers of Antigonon leptopus, Bougainvillea glabra, Cosmos sulphurous, and
285
Tagetes erecta largely used in Thailand for preparation of tea and salads were recently
286
investigated.30 T. erecta extract showed a promising cellular antioxidant activity and total reducing
287
capacity. However, the extract of A. leptopus demonstrated a more potent radical scavenging
288
ability. In a study that included 19 Chinese edible flowers used as tea Paeonia lactiflora, P.
289
suffruticosa, and Rosa rugosa exhibited the stronger antioxidant activity probably due their high
290
polyphenolic contents.31
291
A commercial S. nigra flowers extract was previously investigated for its potential antioxidant
292
capacity.32 This extract exerted significantly DPPH• and OH• radical scavenging activity in a more
293
effective manner than rutin. A significant inhibition of conjugated dienes formation and lipid
294
peroxidation was also observed. C. intybus and S. nigra flowers from Czech Republic were
295
previously investigated for their total phenolics and radical scavenging activity.33 The whole plant
296
of A. azurea, M. sylvestris and C. intybus exerted radical scavenging effects in DPPH test, inhibition
297
of hydrogen peroxide at concentration of 0.2 g/mL, and Fe2+-chelating activity greater than 70%.34 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 14 of 28
298
More recently, M. sylvestris collected in Portugal was analysed for their total phytochemical
299
content and antioxidant activity.35 Flowers extract showed an EC50 of 0.55, 0.17, and 0.11 mg/mL
300
in DPPH, FRAP and -carotene bleaching test, respectively. The methanol extract of A. azurea and
301
C. intybus showed a radical scavenging activity of 0.02 and 1.11 mg/mL, respectively by using
302
DPPH assay.36 Both extracts exhibited also ferric reducing ability (EC50 of 0.01 and 0.57 mg/mL
303
for A. azurea and C. intybus, respectively), and protection of lipid peroxidation (EC50 of 0.02 and
304
0.45 mg/mL for A. azurea and C. intybus, respectively).
305
Quantified flavonoids are able to exert antioxidant activities in different in vitro assays (Table
306
6).37-48 In DPPH radical scavenging activity test quercetin and rutin exhibited IC50 values of 7.3 and
307
10.3 M, respectively.37A different trend in potency was observed in ABTS assay with IC50 values
308
of 19.62 and 2.83 M for quercetin and rutin, respectively.38,39 Luteolin that was found only in M.
309
sylvestris extract showed a promising protection of lipid peroxidation in -carotene bleaching test.
310 311
In vitro Hypoglycaemic Effects of Edible Flowers. The lowering of post-prandial
312
hyperglycaemia through the inhibition of key-enzymes linked to type 2 diabetes mellitus is a critical
313
therapeutic strategy used to control type 2 diabetes. In this study, the ability of edible flower
314
extracts to inhibit -amylase and -glucosidase enzymes are presented in Table 5.
315
All samples inhibited -amylase and -glucosidase in a concentration-dependent manner. Only
316
S. nigra was inactive against -amylase. M. sylvestris extract exhibited an interesting activity with
317
an IC50 value of 7.8 g/mL since the bioactivity is 6.4-fold lower than the commercial drug
318
acarbose (IC50 value of 50.0 g/mL). The same extract exhibited the highest -glucosidase with
319
IC50 value of 11.3 g/mL which was 3.1-fold lower than those reported for acarbose (IC50 value of
320
35.5 g/mL) (Figure 3). Plants from the Malva genus have been previously investigated for their
321
potential anti-diabetic effects. M. verticillata seed extract increased glucose uptake via the
322
activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in vivo.49 More recently, M. parviflora leaves
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
323
n-hexane extract efficiently inhibited insulin resistance, lipid abnormalities and oxidative stress that
324
represent multiple targets involved in diabetes pathogenesis.50
325
A 1.7-fold higher bioactivity compared to acarbose was recorded with C. intybus flower extract
326
against -amylase (IC50 value of 29.3 g/mL). The whole plant of C. intybus demonstrated
327
hypoglycaemic activity in acute and chronic studies (125 mg/kg daily for 14 days to diabetic rats
328
attenuates serum glucose by 20%, triglycerides by 91% and total cholesterol by 16%).51 Authors
329
demonstrated that extract did not change insulin levels in serum, which ruled out the possibility that
330
C. intybus induced insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells. However, C. intybus extract markedly
331
reduced the hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase activity causing a decrease in hepatic glucose
332
production, which in turn results in lower concentration of blood glucose in treated diabetic rats.
333
S. nigra extract showed a selective -glucosidase inhibitory activity with an IC50 value of 11.9
334
g/mL. The in vivo effects of S. nigra polyphenolic rich extract were previously investigated in
335
streptozocin-induced diabetes.52 Glycosylated hemoglobin and lipid peroxides values are reduced
336
by S. nigra extract. A promising IC50 value of 34.5 g/mL was also recorded for R. officinalis
337
extract.
338
Recently, the ability of different R. officinalis whole plant extract to inhibit -amylase was
339
investigated.53 IC50 values of 28.36, 34.11 and 30.39 g/mL for essential oil, ethyl acetate and
340
methanol extracts, respectively, were found. R. officinalis leaves significantly decreased the blood
341
glucose level at a dose of 10 g/day.54 Generally, the hypoglycaemic activity of our samples could be
342
ascribed to their total phenolic and flavonoid content.
343
Rutin, the main abundant flavonoid in our flower extracts, was positively correlated with both -
344
amylase (r2= 0.1201) and -glucosidase (r2= 0.1245). Flavonoids have been reported as potential
345
anti-diabetic agents by acting on various molecular targets and by regulating different signalling
346
pathways. Flavonoids showed to enhance insulin secretion, to regulate glucose metabolism in
347
hepatocytes, to reduce insulin resistance, to increase glucose uptake in skeletal muscle and adipose
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
348
Page 16 of 28
tissue, and to inhibit carbohydrate-hydrolysing enzymes.9,55,56
349
The effect of quercetin and its glycosylated conjugate rutin on -amylase and -glucosidase was
350
previously investigated (Table 6).57,58 Results revealed that both compounds inhibited the enzymes
351
in a dose-dependent manner. Rutin showed higher inhibition of α-amylase than quercetin (EC50
352
value of 0.043 vs 0.061 M). A similar trend was observed also against α-glucosidase (EC50 value
353
of 0.037 vs 0.038 M). Combinations of rutin and quercetin showed a higher carbohydrate-
354
hydrolysing enzymes inhibition than the flavonoids alone suggesting a synergistic effect. The most
355
promising combination resulted 75 % rutin and 25 % quercetin.
356 357
Luteolin, kaempferol and myricetin have greater inhibitory potency on the -glucosidase enzyme with IC50 values of 21, 12 and 5 M, respectively.58
358 359
Conclusions. The renewed interest in the use of flowers in cooking and to improve appearance
360
and nutritive value of meals has prompted the interest of researchers.59 In this context, the findings
361
of this study showed that eight commonly used edible flowers are a rich source of bioactive
362
compounds. S. nigra flower extract contains the highest amount of phenolic content and exerts
363
interesting antioxidant effects. M. sylvestris was demonstrated a very promising hypoglycaemic
364
activity in comparison to the commercial drug acarbose. Results support consumption of edible
365
flowers in diet as functional foods and encourage research to further in vivo study these matrixes to
366
develop more applications such as dietary supplements, functional ingredients, additives to prevent
367
the food oxidation, etc.
368 369
Sources of funding. The study was not specifically funded.
370 371
Conflict of interest statement. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
372 373
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. N.G. Passalacqua of the Botany Department at the University ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
374
of Calabria (Italy) for samples identification. A voucher specimen for each specie has been retained
375
at the Herbarium of the University of Calabria (CLU).
376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383
REFERENCES (1) Rusnak, J. Edible flowers, fresh herbs, baby vegetables: still room for growth. Produce Business, 1999, 15, 3337. (2) Kelley, K. M.; Behe, B. K.; Biernbaum, J. A.; Poff, K. L. Consumer preference for edibleflower color, container size, and price. Hortscience 2001, 36, 801804. (3) Kelley, K. M.; Behe, B. K.; Biernbaum, J. A.; Poff, K. L. Combinations of colors and species of containerized edible flowers: effect on consumer preferences. Hortscience 2002, 37, 218221.
384
(4) Youwei, Z.; Jinlian, Z.; Yonghong, P. A. comparative study on the free radical scavenging
385
activities of some fresh flowers in southern China. LWT – Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 15861591.
386
(5) Willcox, J. K.; Ash, S. L.; Catignani, G. L. Antioxidants and prevention of chronic disease.
387
Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 275295.
388
(6) WHO. Diabetes. Fact sheet N° 312. November 2014
389
(7) Rochette, L.; Zeller, M.; Cottin, Y.; Vergely, C. Diabetes, oxidative stress and therapeutic
390 391 392
strategies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 27092729. (8) Kazeem, M. I.; Adamson J. O.; Ogunwande I. A. Modes of Inhibition of -amylase and glucosidase by aqueous extract of Morinda lucida Benth leaf. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 527570, 16.
393
(9) Tundis, R.; Loizzo, M. R.; Menichini, F. Natural products as alpha-amylase and alpha-
394
glucosidase inhibitors and their hypoglycaemic potential in the treatment of diabetes: an update.
395
Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 315331.
396 397 398
(10) Simonen, P. P.; Gylling, H. K.; Miettinen, T. A. Diabetes contributes to cholesterol metabolism regardless of obesity. Diabetes Care 2002, 25, 15111515. (11) Gao, X.; Ohlander, M.; Jeppsson, N.; Björk, L.; Trajkovski, V. Changes in antioxidant
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 18 of 28
399
effects and their relationship to phytonutrients in fruits of Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides
400
L.) during maturation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 14851490.
401 402
(12) Yoo, K. M.; Lee, C. H.; Lee, H.; Moon, B. K.; Lee, C. Y. Relative antioxidant and cytoprotective activities of common herbs. Food Chem. 2008, 106, 929936.
403
(13) Giusti, M. M.; Wrolstad, R. E. Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by UV-
404
visible spectroscopy. Unit F1.2. In: Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry. New York:
405
John Wiley and Sons, Inc (2001).
406
(14) Loizzo, M. R.; Tundis, R.; Bonesi M.; Menichini, F.; Mastellone, V.; Avallone, L.;
407
Menichini F. Radical scavenging, antioxidant and metal chelating activities of Annona cherimola
408
Mill. (cherimoya) peel and pulp in relation to their total phenolic and total flavonoid contents. J.
409
Food Comp. Anal. 2012, 25, 179184.
410 411
(15) Benzie, I. F.; Strains, J. J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 7076.
412
(16) Loizzo, M. R.; Tundis, R.; Menichini, F.; Pugliese, A.; Bonesi, M.; Solimene, U.;
413
Menichini, F. Chelating, antioxidant and hypoglycaemic potential of Muscari comosum (L.) Mill.
414
bulb extracts. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 61, 780791.
415
(17) Manach, C.; Williamson, G.; Morand, C.; Scalbert, A.; Rémésy, C. Bioavailability and
416
bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
417
2005, 81, 230S–242S.
418 419 420 421 422 423
(18) Halliwell, B. Dietary polyphenols: Good, bad, or indifferent for your health? Cardiovascular Res. 2007, 73, 341347. (19) Tempesta, M. S. Review of Plant Phenolics and Human Health: Biochemistry, Nutrition and Pharmacology. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 12601260. (20) Maisuthisakul, P.; Suttajit, M.; Pongsawatmanit, R. Assessment of phenolic content and free radical-scavenging capacity of some Thai indigenous plants. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 14091418.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
424
(21) Xiong, L.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Lu, B.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, F.; Mao, S.; Shen, C. Phenolic
425
compounds and antioxidant capacities of 10 common edible flowers from China. J. Food Sci. 2014,
426
79, C517C525.
427 428 429 430
(22) Clifford, M. N. Anthocyanins nature, occurrence and dietary burden. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 10631072. (23) He, J.; Giusti, M. M. Anthocyanins: natural colorants with health-promoting properties. Annual Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2000, 1, 163187.
431
(24) Johnson, E. J. The role of carotenoids in human health. Nutr. Clin. Care 2002, 5, 5665.
432
(25) Pellegrini, N.; Serafini, M.; Colombi, B.; Del Rio, D.; Salvatore, S.; Bianchi, M.; Brighenti
433
F. Total antioxidant capacity of plant foods, beverages and oils consumed in Italy assessed by three
434
different in vitro assays. J. Nutr. 2003, 13, 28122829.
435
(26) Naik, G. H.; Priyadarsini, K. I.; Satav, J. G.; Banavalikar, M. M.; Sohoni, P. P.; Biyani, M.
436
K. Comparative antioxidant activity of individual herbal components used in Ayurvedic medicine.
437
Phytochemistry 2003, 63, 97104.
438
(27) Singh, R. P.; Chidambara Murthy, K. N.; Jayaprakasha, G. K. Studies on the antioxidant
439
activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel and seed extracts using in vitro models. J. Agric.
440
Food Chem. 2002, 50, 8186.
441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448
(28) Duh, P. D.; Du, P. C.; Yen, G. C. Action of methanolic extract of mung hulls as inhibitors of lipid peroxidation and non-lipid oxidative damage. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1999, 37, 10551061. (29) Mlcek, J.; Rop, O. Fresh edible flowers of ornamental plants - A new source of nutraceutical foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 561569. (30) Kaisoon, O.; Konczak, I.; Siriamornpun, S. Potential health enhancing properties of edible flowers from Thailand. Food Res. Int. 2012, 46, 563–571. (31) Zeng, Y.; Deng, M.; Lv, Z.; Peng, Y. Evaluation of antioxidant activities of extracts from 19 Chinese edible flowers. SpringerPlus 2014, 3, 315–319.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
449 450 451 452 453 454
Page 20 of 28
(32) Stoilova, I.; Wilker, M.; Stoyanova, A.; Krastanov, A.; Stanchev, V. Antioxidant activity of extract from elder flower (Sambucus nigra L.). Herba Pol. 2007, 53, 4554. (33) Kucekova, Z.; Mlcek, J.; Humpolicek, P.; Rop, O. Edible flowers - antioxidant activity and impact on cell viability. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2013, 8, 10231031. (34) El, S. N.; Karakaya, S. Radical scavenging and iron-chelating activities of some greens used as traditional dishes in Mediterranean diet. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 55, 6774.
455
(35) Barros, L.; Carvalho, A.M.; Ferreira, I.C. Leaves, flowers, immature fruits and leafy
456
flowered stems of Malva sylvestris: a comparative study of the nutraceutical potential and
457
composition. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010, 48,14661472.
458
(36) Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.; Carvalho, A. M.; Sánchez-Mata, M. C.; Cámara, M.; Fernández-
459
Ruiz, V.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M.; Tardío, J. Mediterranean non-cultivated vegetables as dietary
460
sources of compounds with antioxidant and biological activity. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 55,
461
389396.
462 463 464 465 466 467
(37) Hung, C.-Y.; Tsai, C.-Y.; Li, K.-Y. Phenolic antioxidants isolated from the flowers of Osmanthus fragrans. Molecules 2012, 17, 1072410737. (38) Zhao, Y.; Dou, J.; Wu, T.; Aisa, H. A. Investigating the antioxidant and acetylcholinesterase inhibition activities of Gossypium herbaceam. Molecules 2013, 18, 951962. (39) Ejidike, I. P.; Ajibade, P. A. Complexes of (3E)-3-[(2-{(E)-[1-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl) ethylidene]amino}ethyl)imino]-1-phenylbutan-1-one schiff base. Molecules 2015, 20, 97889802.
468
(40) Gurunathan, A.; Subramaniam, P.; Maran, S. Quantification of certain secondary
469
metabolites and evaluation of antioxidant properties in the traditional medicinal plant, Thalictrum
470
javanicum blume. World J. Pharm. Pharmaceutical Sci. 2014, 3, 18561873.
471
(41) Firuzi, O.; Lacanna, A.; Petrucci, R.; Marrosu, G.; Saso, L. Evaluation of the antioxidant
472
activity of flavonoids by bferric reducing antioxidant powerQ assay and cyclic voltammetry.
473
Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2005, 1721, 174–184.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 28
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
474
(42) Emam, A. M.; Mohamed, M. A.; Diab, Y. M.; Megally, N. Y. Isolation and structure
475
elucidation of antioxidant compounds from leaves of Laurus nobilis and Emex spinosus. Drug
476
Discov. Ther. 2010, 4, 202–207.
477 478
(43) Alwahsh, M. A. A.; Khairuddean, M.; Chong, W. K. Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of Teucrium barbeyanum Aschers. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2015, 9, 159–163.
479
(44) Wang, H.; Yang, L.; Zu, y.; Zhao, X. Microwave-assisted simultaneous extraction of
480
luteolin and apigenin from tree peony pod and evaluation of its antioxidant activity. Scientific
481
World Journal, 2014, 2014, Article ID 506971, 12 pages.
482 483
(45) Materska, M. Flavone C-glycosides from Capsicum annuum L.: relationships between antioxidant activity and lipophilicity. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015, 240, 549–557.
484
(46) Sivasothy, Y.; Sulaiman, S. F.; Ooi, K. L.; Ibrahim, H.; Awang, K. Antioxidant and
485
antibacterial activities of flavonoids and curcuminoids from Zingiber spectabile Griff. Food Control
486
2013, 30, 714–720.
487
(47) Khanduja, K. L.; Bhardawaj, A. Stable free radical scavenging and antiperoxidative
488
properties of resveratrol compared in vitro with some other flavonoids. Ind. J. Biochem. Biophys.
489
2003, 40, 416–422.
490
(48) Büchter, C.; Ackermann, D.; Havermann, S.; Honnen, S.; Chovolou, Y.; Fritz, G.;
491
Kampkötter, A.; Wätjen, W. Myricetin-mediated lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans is
492
modulated by DAF-16. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 1189511914.
493 494 495 496
(49) Jeong, Y. T.; Song, C. H. Antidiabetic activities of extract from Malva verticillata seed via the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 21, 921929. (50) Perez Gutierrez, R. M. Evaluation of hypoglycemic activity of the leaves of Malva parviflora in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Food Function 2012, 3, 420427.
497
(51) Pushparaj, P. N.; Low, H. K.; Manikandan, J.; Tan, B. K.; Tanm C. H. Anti-diabetic effects
498
of Cichorium intybus in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111,
499
430434. ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 22 of 28
500
(52) Ciocoiu, M.; Miron, A.; Bădescu, M. New polyphenolic extracts for oxidative stress
501
treatment in experimental diabetes. Revista medico-chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici si
502
Naturalisti din Iasi, 2008, 112, 757763.
503 504
(53) Ali, M. B.; Mnafgui, K.; Feki, A.; Damak, M.; Allouche, N. In vitro Antidiabetic, antiobesity and antioxidant properties of Rosemary extracts. J. Adv. Chem. 2014, 30, 23052316.
505
(54) Labban, L.; Mustafa, U. E.; Ibrahim, Y. M. The effects of Rosemary (Rosmarinus
506
officinalis) leaves powder on glucose level, lipid profile and lipid perodoxation. Int. J. Clin. Med.
507
2014, 5, 297304.
508
(55) de Sales, P. M.; Monteiro de Souza, P.; Simeoni, L. A.; de Oliveira Magalhães, P.; Silveira,
509
D. -Amylase inhibitors: a review of raw material and isolated compounds from plant source. J.
510
Pharm. Pharmaceutical Sci. 2012, 15, 141183.
511 512
(56) Babu, P. V.; Liu, D.; Gilbert, E. R. Recent advances in understanding the anti-diabetic actions of dietary flavonoids. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 17771789.
513
(57) Oboh, G.; Ademosun, A. O.; Ayeni, P. O.; Omojokun, O. S.; Bello F. Comparative effect of
514
quercetin and rutin on -amylase, -glucosidase, and some pro-oxidant-induced lipid peroxidation
515
in rat pancreas. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2014, DOI: 10.1007/s00580-0142040-5
516 517 518 519
(58) Tadera, K.; Minami, Y.; Takamatsu, K.; Matsuoka, T. Inhibition of alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase by flavonoids. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo). 2006, 52, 149153. (59) Cunningham, E. What nutritional contribution do edible flowers make? J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2015, 115, 856.
520 521 522 523 524
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 28
525
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 1. The usage of edible flowers and their extraction yield (%). Common Italian name Buglossa azzurra
Scientific name
Family
Anchusa azurea
Boraginaceae
Capparis spinosa
Capparidaceae
Cappero
Cichorium intybus
Asteraceae
Cicoria comune
Edible use
Traditional medicinal use
Violetlight blue Whiteviolet
Salad, soup, boil, fries Salad and preserved in vinegar and salt
Light blue
Salad, soup, boil, potage
Sulla comune Malva selvatica
Purple
Salad and fries with eggs, soup, boil
Antitussive, depurative, diaphoretic and diuretic Diuretic, antiseptic and protective of capillary vessels Laxative, diuretic, hypoglycaemic, depurative, disinfectant of urinary tract, and hepatoprotective Hypocholesterolemic and laxative
Violetwhite
Decoction
Emollient, and laxative
Fabaceae
Robinia
White
Liquor and jam, pancakes, honey,
Lamiaceae
Rosmarino
Purpleblue
Aromatic, on roast meat or potatoes
Caprifoliacee
Sambuco nero
White
Salad
Hedysarum coronarium
Fabaceae
Malva sylvestris
Malvacee
Robinia pseudoacacia
Rosmarinus officinalis
Sambucus nigra
Color
526 527 528 529 530
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Antispasmodic, antiviral, cholagogue, diuretic, emetic, emollient, febrifuge, laxative, purgative and tonic. Antirheumatic, carminative and anti-eczema Hypolipidemic, antibacterial, antiviral, immunostimulatory, cardioprotective.
Extraction yield (%) 4.4 9.4
6.2
4.8 8.2
9.4
10.5
6.1
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
531
Table 2. Phytochemicals content of edible flowers extracts. Sample
A. azurea C. spinosa C. intybus H. coronarium M. sylvestris R. pseudoacacia R. officinalis S. nigra
532 533
Page 24 of 28
Phenols TCa
TCb
33.6 ± 0.9 33.6 ± 0.7 43.2 ± 0.2 48.4 ± 1.2 30.4 ± 0.8 75.2 ± 0.8 38.8 ± 1.3 228.5 ± 3.2
17.3 ± 0.2 19.4 ± 0.1 32.0 ± 0.2 38.6 ± 0.2 12.7 ± 0.1 45.3 ± 0.3 20.3 ± 0.1 64.2 ± 0.6
Rut ND 7.9 ± 0.8 20.3 ± 0.9 28.2 ± 0.8 ND 28.4 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 0.2 23.7 ± 0.6
Flavonoids HPLCc Que Lut ND ND 5.8 ± 0.2 ND ND ND 8.0 ± 0.6 ND ND 1.5 ± 0.1 ND ND ND ND 23.6 ± 0.7 ND
Kae 0.9 ± 0.03 0.5 ± 0.02 ND 0.5 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.05 2.4 ± 0.2 4.2 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.04
Myr 1.1 ± 0.02 0.6 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 0.6 ND 0.8 ± 0.02 2.1 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.4 2.2 ± 0.4
Anthocyanins TCd
Carotenoids TCd
3.7 ± 0.7 5.4 ± 1.9 1.2 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.1 3.6 ± 1.0 1.1 ± 0.6 0.9 ± 0.2
3.0 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.9 2.5 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 0.6 1.7 ± 0.3
Data represent means ± SD (standard deviation) (n= 3). Kae: kaempferol; Myr: myricetin; Lut: luteolin; Que: quercetin; Rut: rutin. TC: total content. amg of chlorogenic acid equivalents /g of extract; bmg of quercetin equivalents/g of extract; cmg/g of extract; dmg/g of extract. ND: not detected.
534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 28
543
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 3. Fatty acids composition of edible flowers extracts. Fatty acid C9:0 C14:0 C15:0 C16:0 C17:0 C18:0 C18:1 n-9 C18:2 n-6 C18:3 n-3 C19:0 C20:0 C22:0 C23:0 C24:0
544 545 546 547
Pelargonic acid Myristic acid Pentadecanoic acid Palmitic acid Heptadecanoic acid Stearic acid Oleic acid Linoleic acid -Linolenic acid Nonadecanoic acid Arachidic acid Behenic acid Tricosanoic acid Lignoceric acid ∑SFA ∑MUFA ∑PUFA
AA 11.6 ± 1.0 0.6 ± 1.0 14.3 ± 1.0 5.5 ± 1.0 5.8 ± 1.0 6.0 ± 1.0 7.3 ± 1.0 tr 1.7 ± 1.0 1.8 ± 1.0 35.5 5.8 13.3
CA 1.9 ± 1.0 1.6 ± 1.0 25.7 ± 1.0 tr 3.3 ± 1.0 0.4 ± 1.0 0.7 ± 1.0 0.5 ± 1.0 2.6 ± 1.0 5.9 ± 1.0 tr 41.0 0.4 1.2
CI tr 0.7 ± 1.0 1.8 ± 1.0 18.5 ± 1.0 0.4 ± 1.0 1.7 ± 1.0 1.0 ± 1.0 1.9 ± 1.0 0.6 ± 1.0 0.4 ± 1.0 0.8 ± 1.0 1.5 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 1.0 26.1 1.0 2.5
Abundance % HE MA 4.0 ± 1.0 6.4 ± 1.0 0.8 ± 1.0 1.0 ± 1.0 1.5 ± 1.0 7.7 ± 1.0 22.4 ± 1.0 4.4 ± 1.0 3.6 ± 1.0 0.4 ± 1.0 1.9 ± 1.0 1.3 ± 1.0 0.8 ± 1.0 0.7 ± 1.0 3.1 ± 1.0 tr 1.2 ± 1.0 1.2 ± 1.0 2.1 ± 1.0 1.0 ± 1.0 0.2 ± 1.0 22.8 34.5 0.4 1.9 2.0 3.9
RB 2.4 ± 1.0 9.1 ± 1.0 0.7 ± 1.0 2.3 ± 1.0 0.7 ± 1.0 2.7 ± 1.0 0.6 ± 1.0 0.8 ± 1.0 0.5 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 1.0 15.8 0.7 3.3
RS 3.7 ± 1.0 0.4 ± 1.0 7.1 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 1.0 2.2 ± 1.0 1.1 ± 1.0 1.5 ± 1.0 1.9 ± 1.0 0.5 ± 1.0 0.4 ± 1.0 14.6 1.1 3.4
SN 1.7 ± 1.0 1.2 ± 1.0 17.7 ± 1.0 1.5 ± 1.0 0.8 ± 1.0 1.3 ± 1.0 0.2 ± 1.0 1.8 ± 1.0 22.6 1.5 2.1
Data represent means ± SD (standard deviation) (n= 3); AA: Anchusa azurea; CA: Capparis spinosa; CI: Cichorium intybus; HE: Hedysarum coronarium; MA: Malva sylvestris; RB: Robinia pseudoacacia; RS: Rosmarinus officinalis; SN: Sambucus nigra. SFA: Saturated Fatty Acids; MUFA: Monounsaturated Fatty Acids; PUFA: Polyunsaturated fatty acids. tr: < 0.1%. -: not detected.
548 549 550 551 552 553
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
554
Table 4. Antioxidant activity of edible flowers extracts. Edible flowers
Anchusa azurea Capparis spinosa Cichorium intybus Hedysarum coronarium Malva sylvestris Robinia pseudoacacia Rosmarinus officinalis Sambucus nigra Positive control BHT Ascorbic acid Propyl gallate
555 556 557 558 559 560
Page 26 of 28
-carotene bleaching IC50 (g/mL)
DPPH IC50 (g/mL)
ABTS IC50 (g/mL)
FRAP test
3.7 ± 0.4 41.7 ± 1.1*** 7.4 ± 0.7 1.6 ± 0.8 124.6 ± 2.3*** 174.8 ± 4.8*** 4.7 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.3
30.2 ± 1.4*** 139.3 ± 3.9*** 16.2 ± 1.4*** 28.5 ± 2.2*** 108.9 ± 5.7*** 197.5 ± 4.2*** 20.8 ± 1.7*** 11.4 ± 1.2***
30 min 3.5 ± 0.8 36.8 ± 2.4*** 16.2 ± 1.2*** 17.3 ±1.5*** 8.5 ± 2.6*** 10.7 ± 1.2*** 3.5 ± 1.7 2.2 ± 0.6
60 min 7.1 ± 0.8*** 63.9 ± 2.9*** 21.2 ± 1.3*** 18.7 ± 1.6*** 10.5 ± 1.2*** 32.9 ± 2.5*** 4.7 ± 0.7 6.1 ± 0.8
26.1 ± 3.8*** 20.8 ± 4.1*** 52.4 ± 2.1*** 19.1 ± 1.9*** 6.3 ± 1.1*** NA 59.9 ± 4.9 83.8 ± 4.8***
5.0 ± 0.8 -
1.7 ± 0.3 -
1.0 ± 0.04
1.0 ± 0.05
63.2 ± 4.3 -
M Fe(II)/g
Data are expressed as means ± S.D. (n= 3). NA: not active. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity Assay: One-way ANOVA ***p