Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LIBRARY
Article
Effect of Nitrogen Oxides on Elemental Mercury Removal by Nanosized Mineral Sulfide Hailong Li, Lei Zhu, Jun Wang, Liqing Li, Po Heng Lee, Yong Feng, and Kaimin Shih Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00224 • Publication Date (Web): 29 Jun 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 2, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
TOC Art
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Effect of Nitrogen Oxides on Elemental Mercury
2
Removal by Nanosized Mineral Sulfide
3
Hailong Li1,4, Lei Zhu1, Jun Wang2, Liqing Li1, Po-Heng Lee3, Yong Feng4, Kaimin Shih4*
4
1
School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China, 410083
5
2
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of
6 7
Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73126 3
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong
8 9
Page 2 of 30
Kong SAR, China 4
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
10
11
Revision Submitted to Environmental
Science & Technology
12
13
*To whom correspondence should be addressed:
14
TEL: 86-18670016725
15
FAX: 86-731-88879863
16
Email:
[email protected] 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
1
Page 3 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
18
ABSTRACT: Because of its large surface area, nanosized zinc sulfide (Nano-ZnS) has been
19
demonstrated in a previous study to be efficient for removal of elemental mercury (Hg0) from coal
20
combustion flue gas. The excellent mercury adsorption performance of Nano-ZnS was found to be
21
insusceptible to water vapor, sulfur dioxide, and hydrogen chloride. However, nitrogen oxides (NOx)
22
apparently inhibited mercury removal by Nano-ZnS; this finding was unlike those of many studies on
23
the promotional effect of NOx on Hg0 removal by other sorbents. The negative effect of NOx on Hg0
24
adsorption over Nano-ZnS was systematically investigated in this study. Two mechanisms were
25
identified as primarily responsible for the inhibitive effect of NOx on Hg0 adsorption over Nano-ZnS: (1)
26
active sulfur sites on Nano-ZnS were oxidized to inactive sulfate by NOx; and (2) the chemisorbed
27
mercury, i.e., HgS, was reduced to Hg0 by NOx. This new insight into of the role of NOx in Hg0
28
adsorption over Nano-ZnS can help to optimize operating conditions, maximize Hg0 adsorption, and
29
facilitate the application of Nano-ZnS as a superior alternative to activated carbon for Hg0 removal
30
using existing particulate matter control devices in power plants.
31
KEYWORDS: Mercury, Nitrogen oxides, Mineral sulfide, Adsorption
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
2
Environmental Science & Technology
33
Page 4 of 30
INTRODUCTION
34
The 50-ratification milestone for the Minamata Convention on Mercury was reached on 18 May 2017,
35
as a result of which, the Minamata Convention aims at protecting human health and the environment
36
from anthropogenic mercury emissions will take into effect for all its parties from 16 August 2017. To
37
plan ahead, national standards to restrict mercury emission from coal-fired power plants have come into
38
force prior to September 2016 in both China and the United States.1, 2 In addition to federal efforts,
39
many US states had adopted their own emission regulations which are generally more strict to limit
40
mercury emission from coal-fired power plants.3 To meet the requirements of both global and regional
41
mercury regulations, various technologies such as activated carbon injection (ACI), have been
42
thoroughly researched and developed for the removal of mercury, especially elemental mercury (Hg0),
43
from coal-fired power plants.4-6
44
Among these technologies, ACI is recognized as the maximum achievable control technology for
45
mercury capture from coal combustion flue gas.7 Either electrostatic precipitators or baghouses are
46
installed in most coal-fired power plants to control the emission of particulate matters. In these existing
47
particulate matter control devices, the injected activated carbons loaded with mercury can be efficiently
48
collected. However, ACI still has several drawbacks associated with carbon materials, such as its low
49
operating temperature and prevention of the beneficial reuse of coal fly ashes. Therefore, the injection
50
of non-carbon sorbents is considered to be a better technology for mercury emission control.8 Grafting
51
of sulfur species has been used to efficiently enhance the performance of non-carbon adsorbents for
52
mercury removal from both aqueous solution and air.9,
53
believed to be the key factor that affects the performance of sulfur-impregnated materials.8, 11, 12 From
10
A large surface coverage of sulfur was
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
3
Page 5 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
54
the perspective of surface sulfur coverage, mineral sulfides would be promising for mercury removal,
55
because they comprise entirely of “active” sulfur sites. Fabrication of sulfide-based sorbents requires
56
fewer and safer raw materials and can be even achieved through recycling mining wastes that contain
57
metal sulfides.13 Moreover, mineral sulfides such as zinc sulfide (ZnS), pyrite (FeS2), and mercuric
58
sulfide (HgS) are very stable14 and able to restrain mercury methylation.15 Furthermore, a small amount
59
of mineral sulfides in concrete does not reduce the performance of concrete, more than that, they could
60
limit the leaching of heavy metals.16 With these advantages, it is probably a scientifically sound and
61
economically feasible method to use mineral sulfides for the removal of mercury from coal combustion
62
flue gas. Hg0 capture performance and the involved mechanism for a mineral sulfide, i.e., sphalerite,
63
were preliminarily investigated in our previous study.17 Under relatively simple atmospheres, the
64
developed nano-sphalerite (Nano-ZnS) was found to be preferable in both Hg0 adsorption capacity and
65
adsorption rate compared to several commercial activated carbons. However, more in-depth studies
66
under real flue gas conditions are urgently needed before the technology can be commercialized.
67
Coal combustion flue gas generally contains variable amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2), water (H2O),
68
sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and hydrogen chloride (HCl), the concentrations of which
69
depend on the coal types, the firing systems, and the combustion conditions.18 For carbon-based
70
sorbents, the impacts of different flue gas components on mercury removal have been widely
71
investigated. CO2 neither reacts with Hg0 nor interferes with the reactions between carbon sorbents and
72
mercury.19 HCl has significant benefits for Hg0 oxidation and subsequent adsorption.20, 21 In contrast,
73
H2O is generally believed to decrease the mercury adsorption capacity due to competitive adsorption
74
and/or additional internal mass transfer resistance.19, 22, 23 The role of SO2 in mercury adsorption is still
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
4
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 6 of 30
75
in controversial.24 Favorable,20 adverse,25, 26 and negligible27 effects have all been reported, depending
76
on the materials and flue gas conditions. Mixtures of nitrogen monoxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide
77
(NO2), also known as NOx, always show a promotional effect on mercury adsorption by carbon
78
materials.20, 21, 26, 28 The effects of flue gas constitutes on mercury adsorption have not yet been studied
79
for the recently developed Nano-ZnS sorbent.
80
In this study, the mercury removal performance of Nano-ZnS synthesized via a liquid-phase
81
precipitation method was evaluated under different flue gas atmospheres. We found that the Nano-ZnS
82
performed well in Hg0 adsorption under simulated coal combustion flue gas at temperatures below 180
83
°C. More importantly, the excellent mercury adsorption performance of Nano-ZnS was insusceptible to
84
H2O, HCl, and SO2 (as shown in Figure S1-S3 in the Supporting Information). With these merits, it is
85
probably promising to use Nano-ZnS for the removal of mercury from real coal-fired power plants,
86
especially those that burn low-chlorine or high-sulfur coals. However, NO, especially in the presence of
87
oxygen (O2), was observed to be detrimental for mercury capture by Nano-ZnS, which is contrary to the
88
findings of studies regarding the effects of NOx on other mercury adsorbents. Therefore, the focus of
89
this study was to examine the effects of NOx on mercury adsorption over Nano-ZnS and to clarify the
90
involved mechanisms. An in-depth understanding of the interactions between mercury, NOx, and Nano-
91
ZnS is critical to the design of a novel mineral sulfide sorbent for the abatement of mercury pollution
92
from coal combustion.
93
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
94
Material Preparation. Nano-ZnS was synthesized using a liquid-phase precipitation method
95
reported in our previous study 17, the details of which are also presented in the Supporting Information.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
5
Page 7 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
96
The prepared Nano-ZnS exhibited a specific surface area of 196.1 m2⋅g−1. The mean diameter of the
97
ZnS nanocrystal was 6 nm, indicating that the prepared material was in the nanometer range.
98
Experimental System and Method. The Hg0 adsorption performance of Nano-ZnS was evaluated on
99
an identical bench-scale experimental system following the same experimental protocol described in our
100
previous study.17 Six sets of experiments with details summarized in Table S1 were conducted in this
101
study. Set I experiments were carried out to examine the effects of NOx on Hg0 adsorption over Nano-
102
ZnS. Set II experiments conducted on Nano-ZnS loaded with Hg0 (fresh Nano-ZnS adsorbed mercury in
103
nitrogen (N2) gas flow containing 300 µg⋅m−3 Hg0 at 180 °C for 1 h) were designed to determine
104
whether competitive adsorption occurred between NOx and Hg0 on Nano-ZnS. In Set III experiments, a
105
relatively long (72 h) mercury adsorption process was used to accumulate sufficient HgS on the Nano-
106
ZnS surface; Nano-ZnS loaded with HgS was then heated to eliminate a small amount of Hg0, and NO
107
and NOx were subsequently added to explore their respective reactions with HgS after stabilization of
108
the outlet Hg0 concentration. The experiments in Set IV aimed to determine the detrimental effects of
109
NOx on Hg0 adsorption via alteration of the Nano-ZnS surface using O2, NO, or NOx pretreatments
110
(fresh Nano-ZnS treated by 4% O2 balanced in N2, 1000 ppm NO balanced in N2, and 1000 ppm NO
111
plus 4% O2 balanced in N2 at 180°C for 2 h; the Nano-ZnS was then flushed by pure N2 gas flow at the
112
same temperature for 30 min). Pure HgS was used in the Set V experiments to further identify the
113
induced HgS reduction by NOx. In Set VI, temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) experiments
114
were conducted to further verify our inference regarding the mechanisms responsible for the detrimental
115
effects of NOx on Hg0 removal by Nano-ZnS. The heating rate from room temperature to 600 °C was
116
nominally 5 °C ⋅ min−1. Mercuric compounds on the Nano-ZnS decomposed to Hg0 during the TPD
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
6
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 8 of 30
117
experiments. A pure N2 gas low with flow rate of 250 ml⋅min−1 was adopted to extract Hg0 from the
118
reactor.
119
For each Hg0 adsorption experiment, the gas stream upstream the reactor inlet was monitored until the
120
desired inlet Hg0 concentration (Cin) stabilized for at least 30 min. The gas flow was then passed
121
through the Nano-ZnS sorbent in the reactor, and was online measured at the exit of the reactor as the
122
outlet Hg0 concentration (Cout). Each experiment was conducted at least in duplicate, and the mean
123
values are reported. The relative errors were smaller than 5% for most experiments.
124
Characterization of Sorbent. The surface changes of the Nano-ZnS after Hg0 adsorption in the
125
presence of NOx were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Fourier transform-
126
infrared (FTIR) spectrum. XPS analysis was conducted using an Escalab 250Xi (Thermo Fisher
127
Scientific, USA), in which a vacuum was maintained at 10−6 P, and a monochromatized Al Kα radiation
128
(hυ = 1486.6 eV) was adopted as the excitation source. The sorbent was cooled and dried in a desiccator
129
before XPS analysis. The binding energy values were calibrated by the carbonaceous C1s line of 284.8
130
eV. Mixtures of 0.5% finely ground samples and KBr were fabricated to be KBr disks which were then
131
detected by an FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet, 6700) to get the samples’ FTIR spectra. The spectra were
132
recorded from 4000 to 400 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1.
133
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
134
NOx Exhibited Obvious Detrimental Effects on Hg0 Adsorption by Nano-ZnS. NO has usually
135
been reported to facilitate Hg0 oxidation and/or subsequent adsorption with the aid of fly ashes,29
136
sorbents,26 or catalysts.18, 30 However, in this study, NO was found to have inhibitory effects on Hg0
137
adsorption over Nano-ZnS. As shown in Figure 1, a slightly prohibitive effect was observed for the gas
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
7
Page 9 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
138
flow containing 300 ppm NO balanced in N2, resulting in the detection of more Hg0 at the reactor outlet.
139
A further increase in the NO concentration to 1000 ppm led to a relatively lower mercury adsorption
140
capacity, further identifying the insignificant inhibitive effect of NO on Hg0 adsorption over Nano-ZnS.
141
However, NO with the aid of O2 exhibited a pronounced inhibitive effect on Hg0 adsorption. The
142
normalized outlet Hg0 concentration at the end of a 4-h test increased from 0.08 to 0.15 with the
143
introduction of 4% O2 to the gas flow containing 300 ppm NO. For 1000 ppm NO plus 4% O2, the
144
normalized outlet Hg0 concentration sharply increased to 0.45 at the end of a 4-h test. As illustrated in
145
Figure 1, O2 was almost inert in Hg0 adsorption on the Nano-ZnS. However, with the aid of O2, NO
146
exhibited evident inhibitory effect on Hg0 adsorption, and more NO led to a greater inhibitory effect on
147
Hg0 adsorption. In the presence of O2, the NO was partially oxidized into NO2, particularly at the low
148
flue gas temperatures.31 It is therefore reasonable to conclude that NOx exhibited a noticeable
149
detrimental effect on Hg0 adsorption by Nano-ZnS.
150
It should be noted that Nano-ZnS is likely to be used as an alternative to activated carbons, which are
151
usually injected downstream of a selective catalytic reduction device, where the NOx concentration is
152
relatively low. Moreover, the adsorption rate within 30 min was barely affected by NOx. The 30-min
153
timespan is the most important parameter because the residence time of the injected sorbent that
154
interacts with mercury is about 3 to 5 s in the case of an electrostatic precipitator and approximately 25
155
min in the case of a fabric filter.10 Even though NOx could limit Hg0 adsorption by Nano-ZnS, the
156
results still imply that Nano-ZnS is a promising sorbent candidate for Hg0 removal in coal-fired power
157
plants, because the combination of the high Hg0 adsorption rate17 and the low NOx concentration at the
158
injection site give Nano-ZnS excellent Hg0 adsorption performance.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
8
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 10 of 30
159
NOx Did Not Repel Hg0 From Nano-ZnS Surface. Competitive adsorption between Hg0 and other
160
flue gas components on a sorbent usually resulted in the deactivation of the sorbent for Hg0 removal.
161
For example, the competitive adsorption between water vapor and Hg0 reduced the capacity for Hg0
162
uptake of sulfur-impregnated activated carbon by as much as 25%.19 Sulfur oxides (SOx) limited Hg0
163
adsorption on a carbon surface because the Hg0 and the SOx were competing for the same binding
164
sites.27 Although the primary mechanism responsible for Hg0 removal over Nano-ZnS was identified as
165
chemisorption, physical adsorption of Hg0 also occurred on the Nano-ZnS surface.17 The physical
166
adsorption was probably a result of the Nano-ZnS’s large surface area. In addition, weakly adsorbed
167
Hg0 is generally believed to be crucial for the subsequent Hg0 oxidation/chemisorption process.32 If
168
competitive adsorption occurred between Hg0 and NOx on the Nano-ZnS surface, both physical
169
adsorption and the subsequent chemisorption of Hg0 will be negatively affected by the presence of NOX.
170
This mechanism should be responsible for the deactivation of Hg0 adsorption as shown in Figure 1.
171
However, the introduction of NOx did not cause any Hg0 discharge from the used Nano-ZnS as
172
illustrated in Figure 2. Neither the addition of 1000 ppm NO nor the addition of 1000 ppm NO plus 4%
173
O2 repelled Hg0 from the Nano-ZnS loaded with Hg0. In contrast to the results reported in the literature,
174
our results indicate that competitive adsorption between Hg0 and NOx was not responsible for the
175
deactivation of Hg0 adsorption.
176
NOX Deactivated Nano-ZnS Surface for Hg0 Adsorption. The inhibition of mercury capture by flue
177
gas components such as SO2 was generally attributed to the depletion of surface active sites by reactions
178
between the sorbent and flue gas components.27 Oxidative NOx would probably react with reduced
179
sulfur species on Nano-ZnS surface, which has a high binding affinity for mercury8, 11 and hence leads
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
9
Page 11 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
180
to the inactivation of Nano-ZnS for Hg0 capture. Pretreatment of Nano-ZnS with either NO or NOx was
181
adopted to identify the possible surface deactivation for Hg0 adsorption. As shown in Figure 3, O2
182
pretreatment exhibited negligible effect on Hg0 adsorption. This is in agreement with the results shown
183
in Figure 1 that O2 was almost inert in Hg0 adsorption on the Nano-ZnS sorbent. NO pretreatment had
184
an inhibitory effect on Hg0 adsorption in a pure N2 atmosphere. After passing through the Nano-ZnS
185
pretreated by NO, the normalized outlet Hg0 concentration gradually increased to 0.36 at the end of the
186
4-h test, which was much higher than that observed over fresh Nano-ZnS, which indicates that the active
187
surface Hg0 adsorption sites were at least partially destroyed or decreased during the NO pretreatment
188
process. The Hg0 adsorption performance of NOx-pretreated Nano-ZnS was significantly lower than that
189
for the NO-pretreated Nano-ZnS, indicating that NOx was more reactive than NO for consumption of
190
the active Hg0 adsorption sites on the Nano-ZnS. The findings also imply that the active Hg0 adsorption
191
sites on the Nano-ZnS were probably oxidized, because NOx is more oxidative than NO alone.
192
NOx Induced HgS Reduction on Nano-ZnS. It is also likely that flue gas components induced the
193
reduction of oxidized mercury to generate Hg0,33, 34 which then left the sorbent’s surface and resulted in
194
a lower Hg0 removal rate, as observed in this study. NO was capable of promoting the reduction of
195
oxidized mercury to Hg0 at elevated temperatures.35 If NOx can react with HgS to form Hg0 and then
196
discharge the Hg0 from the Nano-ZnS surface at the experimental temperature, the detrimental effects of
197
NOx on Hg0 adsorption will be somewhat clarified, because the observed Hg0 removal rate reflected the
198
net sum of Hg0 adsorption and desorption from the sorbent. As shown in Figure 4, Nano-ZnS loaded
199
with HgS was first heated at 180°C in a pure N2 gas flow to establish equilibrium, as marked by
200
fluctuation of the Hg0 concentration at the reactor outlet within 5% for more than 30 min. Relative to the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
10
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 12 of 30
201
equilibrium state, more Hg0 was detected at the reactor outlet at the initial few minutes, probably due to
202
desorption of the physically adsorbed Hg0. At the equilibrium stage, a small amount of Hg0 at the
203
reactor outlet was attributed to the slow decomposition of HgS. More Hg0 emission was observed after
204
the addition of 1000 ppm NO. This is in accordance with Figure 1 that NO slightly inhibited Hg0
205
adsorption by Nano-ZnS. A sharp increase in Hg0 was observed after the simultaneous addition of 1000
206
ppm NO and 4% O2 to an N2 gas flow passing through Nano-ZnS loaded with mercury. As HgS was
207
identified to be the primary mercury species on the Nano-ZnS,17 it is very likely that HgS was reduced
208
by NOx to form Hg0.
209
Identification of Mechanisms Responsible for Detrimental Effect of NOx on Hg0 Adsorption. As
210
stated above, two hypotheses were considered to be accountable for the inhibitive effects of NOx on Hg0
211
adsorption over Nano-ZnS: (1) the active Hg0 adsorption sites on Nano-ZnS were oxidized by NOx; and
212
(2) the chemisorbed mercury, i.e., HgS, was reduced to Hg0 by NOx.
213
To identify the possible oxidation of a sorbent surface by NOx, the surface changes of Nano-ZnS after
214
72 h of Hg0 adsorption in the presence of NOx were analyzed by FTIR spectrum and XPS, and the
215
results are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. The absorption peaks at 3430 cm−1 and 1621 cm−1 on
216
the FTIR spectra were attributed to water molecules and hydrogen bonded hydroxyl groups,
217
respectively.36 The insignificant peak at 1388 cm−1 can be ascribed to the N-O stretching mode after
218
NOx adsorption.37 The bands at 1117 cm−1 and 618 cm−1 corresponded to sulfate.38, 39 The sulfate peak
219
intensity for the Nano-ZnS with NO was greater than that for the Nano-ZnS without NO, which
220
demonstrates that the NO oxidized the low-valence sulfur on the Nano-ZnS surface to form sulfate.
221
Low-valence sulfur compounds including elemental sulfur (S0) and sulfide (HS−, S2−) generally have a
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
11
Page 13 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
222
high binding affinity for gas phase Hg0.8, 11 Once the low-valence sulfur on the Nano-ZnS was oxidized
223
into sulfate, its affinity to Hg0 disappeared due to the inhibition of Hg0 adsorption from sulfate.27, 40
224
Therefore, the Hg0 adsorption performance in the presence of NO was inferior to that under pure N2
225
atmosphere. The Nano-ZnS under an NOx atmosphere exhibited two stronger sulfate peaks at 1117 cm−1
226
and 618 cm−1 compared to the Nano-ZnS used in the presence of NO, which indicates that NOx is more
227
active than NO in the oxidation of reduced sulfur to sulfate. This finding is in accordance with the
228
results of the Hg0 adsorption experiments in Set I, in which Nano-ZnS exhibited an inferior Hg0 removal
229
performance in the presence of NOx compared to that in the presence of NO alone.
230
The S 2p spectra of fresh Nano-ZnS and Nano-ZnS used under NO or NOx are presented in Figure 6.
231
As shown, the S 2p spectra of the different Nano-ZnS have two peaks at 161.9 and 168.9 eV,
232
respectively. The significant peak at 161.9 eV was ascribed to S2−,39, 41 and the other small peak around
233
168.9 eV corresponded to sulfur at oxidative states such as sulfate.42 For fresh Nano-ZnS, a trace of
234
sulfate seemingly came from the raw material, i.e., zinc sulfate. Compared to fresh Nano-ZnS, the
235
intensity of the peak around 168.9 eV showed an apparent increase when Nano-ZnS was used for Hg0
236
removal in the presence of NO. The increased intensity indicates that NO facilitated sulfate formation
237
via oxidation of low-valence sulfur on the Nano-ZnS surface, because no other sulfur source other than
238
that on the Nano-ZnS existed in the experimental system. This finding is in line with the FTIR results,
239
which show that NO oxidized the low-valence sulfur on the Nano-ZnS surface into sulfate. NOx with a
240
greater affinity for oxidation further promoted sulfate formation and hence led to a much greater sulfate
241
peak on the S 2p XPS spectrum. A similar phenomenon has been reported in the literature in which NO2
242
was observed to be more reactive than NO for sulfate accumulation on a mercury-sorbent surface.43 The
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
12
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 14 of 30
243
O 1s peaks also rose from fresh Nano-ZnS to Nano-ZnS used under NO, and further to Nano-ZnS used
244
under NOx. This finding is in agreement with the sulfate formation trend on the Nano-ZnS surface.
245 246 247 248 249
For the second mechanism, NO or NOx reacted with HgS on the Nano-ZnS surface to form Hg0, which was then released from the Nano-ZnS surface. The reaction processes are presumably as follows: HgS(s) + 2NO(g) → Hg0(g) + SO2(g) + N2(g)
(1)
∆Hθm = -357.81 kJ/mol; ∆Gθm = -390.87 kJ/mol; Kθ (180 ̊ C) = 1.14×1045 3HgS(s) + 2NO(g) + 2NO2(g)→ 3Hg0(g) + 3SO2(g) + 2N2(g)
(2)
250
∆Hθm = -778.78 kJ/mol; ∆Gθm = -929.03 kJ/mol; Kθ (180 ̊ C) = 1.23×10107
251
According to thermodynamics, both the Gibbs free energy and the enthalpy variations of reactions (1)
252
and (2) are far less than 0, indicating that reactions (1) and (2) are spontaneous and favorable from the
253
thermodynamic perspective. Moreover, Hg2+ conversion experiments over pure HgS was conducted at
254
180 °C to further verify the induced Hg2+ reduction by NOx. As shown in Figure 7, pure HgS was
255
reduced by 1000 ppm NO, indicating that reaction (1) is practical and feasible. More HgS was reduced
256
when 1000 ppm NO and 4% O2 were added simultaneously. These results conform to the
257
thermodynamic data of equations (1) and (2), that is, the equilibrium constant of equation (2) is much
258
higher than that of equation (1). It should be noted that the phenomenon observed in the Set III
259
experiments (Figure 4) was similar to that in the Set V experiments (Figure 7), which demonstrates that
260
Hg0 was chemisorbed on the Nano-ZnS to form HgS during the 72-h pretreatment process. This finding
261
is consistent with our previous finding that physically adsorbed Hg0 reacted with the adjacent surface
262
sulfur on the Nano-ZnS to form the most stable HgS.17 When Nano-ZnS accumulates sufficient HgS on
263
the surface, Hg0 from the reduction of HgS by NOx would be released from the sorbent and could hence
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
13
Page 15 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
264
lead to the deactivation of Nano-ZnS for Hg0 removal. However, the small amount of Hg0 from the
265
reduction of HgS in Equations (1) and (2) would be re-adsorbed by Nano-ZnS with a large surface area,
266
assuming that insufficient HgS is present on the Nano-ZnS surface.
267
In short, NOx could deactivate the Hg0 removal performance of Nano-ZnS via sulfation of the Nano-
268
ZnS surface and the induced reduction of HgS. Both reactions induced by NOx could result in less HgS,
269
which is the immobilized form of Hg0 on the Nano-ZnS. This hypothesis was further validated by a
270
TPD experiment, the results of which are shown in Figure 8. No Hg0 peak was observed for fresh Nano-
271
ZnS that was free of mercury. Decomposition of mercuric compounds occurred from 180 °C to 420 °C,
272
with a peak decomposition rate at approximately 310 °C, indicating that the primary mercury species on
273
the used Nano-ZnS was HgS.44, 45 The Nano-ZnS used for Hg0 removal under pure N2 atmosphere
274
accumulated maximum HgS on its surface, which then decomposed to Hg0 during the TPD experiment.
275
A quantity of 1000 ppm NO in N2 inhibited HgS accumulation on the Nano-ZnS, and hence less Hg0
276
was detected in the TPD experiment. Minimal Hg0 discharge was observed over the Nano-ZnS used for
277
Hg0 adsorption in the presence of NO and O2. These results coincide fully with those shown in Figure 1
278
that NO slightly inhibited Hg0 adsorption over Nano-ZnS, whereas NOx evidently limited Hg0
279
adsorption by Nano-ZnS.
280
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
281
This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51476189), the
282
Environmental Research Funds of Hunan Province (NO.2016QNZT032), and the Research Grants
283
Council of Hong Kong (17257616, C7044-14G, and T21-771/16R).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
14
Environmental Science & Technology
284
285
Page 16 of 30
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Material preparation, one table, and three figures. This material is available free of charge at
286
http://pubs.acs.org.
287
REFERENCES
288
(1) Ministry of Environmental Protection The people's Republic of China, Emission standard of air
289
pollutants
290
http://www.zhb.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201109/W020120113518288046763.pdf (accessed Jan, 2015).
291
(2)
292
http://www.epa.gov/airquality/powerplanttoxics/actions.html (accessed July, 2010).
293
(3) Milford, J. B.; Pienciak, A. After the Clean Air Mercury Rule: Prospects for Reducing Mercury
294
Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (8), 2669-2673.
295
(4) Jones, A. P.; Hoffmann, J. W.; Smith, D. N.; Feeley, T. J.; Murphy, J. T. DOE/NETL's Phase II
296
Mercury Control Technology Field Testing Program: Preliminary Economic Analysis of Activated
297
Carbon Injection. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41 (4), 1365-1371.
298
(5) Qu, Z.; Yan, N.; Liu, P.; Guo, Y.; Jia, J. Oxidation and Stabilization of Elemental Mercury from
299
Coal-Fired Flue Gas by Sulfur Monobromide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (10), 3889-3894.
300
(6) Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Removal of Elemental Mercury from Flue Gas by Thermally Activated
301
Ammonium Persulfate in A Bubble Column Reactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 8 (20), 12181-12189.
302
(7) Pavlish, J. H.; Sondreal, E. A.; Mann, M. D.; Olson, E. S.; Galbreath, K. C.; Laudal, D. L.; Benson,
303
S. A. Status Review of Mercury Control Options for Coal-fired Power Plants. Fuel Process. Technol.
U.S.
for
Environmental
thermal
Protection
power
Agency,
plants
Air
Toxics
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
(GB
Standards
13223-2011);
for
Utilities;
15
Page 17 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
304
2003, 82 (2-3), 89-165.
305
(8) Lee, J. Y.; Ju, Y. H.; Keener, T. C.; Varma, R. S. Development of Cost-effective Noncarbon
306
Sorbents for Hg0 Removal from Coal-fired Power Plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (8), 2714-
307
2720.
308
(9) Li, B. Y.; Zhang, Y. M.; Ma, D. X.; Shi, Z.; Ma, S. Q. Mercury Nano-trap for Effective and Efficient
309
Removal of Mercury(II) from Aqueous Solution. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5537.
310
(10) Sun, Q.; Aguila, B.; Perman, J.; Earl, L. D.; Abney, C. W.; Cheng, Y. C.; Wei, H.; Nguyen, N.;
311
Wojtas, L.; Ma, S. Q. Postsynthetically Modified Covalent Organic Frameworks for Efficient and
312
Effective Mercury Removal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (7), 2786-2793.
313
(11) Otani, Y.; Kanaoka, C.; Emi, H.; Uchijima, I.; Nishino, H. Removal of Mercury Vapor from Air
314
with Sulfur-impregnated Adsorbents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1988, 22 (6), 708-711.
315
(12) Makkuni, A.; Varma, R.; Sikdar, S.; Bhattacharyya, D. Vapor Phase Mercury Sorption by Organic
316
Sulfide Modified Bimetallic Iron-copper Nanoparticle Aggregates. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46 (4),
317
1305-1315.
318
(13) Martellaro, P.; Moore, G.; Peterson, E.; Abbott, E.; Gorenbain, A. Environmental Application of
319
Mineral Sulfides for Removal of Gas-phase Hg(0) and Aqueous Hg2+. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2001, 36 (5-6),
320
1183-1196.
321
(14) Lau, B. L.; Hsu-Kim, H. Precipitation and Growth of Zinc Sulfide Nanoparticles in the Presence of
322
Thiol-containing Natural Organic Ligands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42 (19), 7236-7241.
323
(15) Benoit, J. M.; Gilmour, C. C.; Mason, R. P.; Heyes, A. Sulfide Controls on Mercury Speciation and
324
Bioavailability to Methylating Bacteria in Sediment Pore Waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33 (10),
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
16
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 18 of 30
325
1780-1780.
326
(16) Shi, H. S.; S., H. C. Study of Effect of Sulfide on Zinc Ion in Cement-based Materials. Cement
327
2006, (02), 15-18.
328
(17) Li, H.; Zhu, L.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Shih, K. Development of Nano-Sulfide Sorbent for Efficient
329
Removal of Elemental Mercury from Coal Combustion Fuel Gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50 (17),
330
9551-9557.
331
(18) Li, H.; Wu, C. Y.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J. Role of Flue Gas Components in Mercury
332
Oxidation over TiO2 Supported MnOx-CeO2 Mixed-oxide at Low Temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012,
333
243 (0), 117-123.
334
(19) Liu, W.; Vidic, R. D.; Brown, T. D. Impact of Flue Gas Conditions on Mercury Uptake by Sulfur-
335
impregnated Activated Carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34 (1), 154-159.
336
(20) Miller, S. J.; Dunham, G. E.; Olson, E. S.; Brown, T. D. Flue Gas Effects on A Carbon-based
337
Mercury Sorbent. Fuel Process. Technol. 2000, 65, 343-363.
338
(21) Tong, L.; Xu, W. Q.; Zhou, X.; Liu, R. H.; Zhu, T. Y. Effects of Multi-component Flue Gases on
339
Hg0 Removal over HNO3-Modified Activated Carbon. Energy Fuels 2015, 29 (8), 5231-5236.
340
(22) Hsi, H. C.; Tsai, C. Y.; Lin, K. J. Impact of Surface Functional Groups, Water Vapor, and Flue Gas
341
Components on Mercury Adsorption and Oxidation by Sulfur-Impregnated Activated Carbons. Energy
342
Fuels 2014, 28 (5), 3300-3309.
343
(23) Lopez-Anton, M. A.; Rumayor, M.; Diaz-Somoano, M.; Martinez-Tarazona, M. R. Influence of A
344
CO2-enriched Flue Gas on Mercury Capture by Activated Carbons. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 262, 1237-1243.
345
(24) Liu, J.; Qu, W. Q.; Joo, S. W.; Zheng, C. G. Effect of SO2 on Mercury Binding on Carbonaceous
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
17
Page 19 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
346
Surfaces. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 184, 163-167.
347
(25) Ochiai, R.; Uddin, M. A.; Sasaoka, E.; Wu, S. J. Effects of HCl and SO2 Concentration on Mercury
348
Removal by Activated Carbon Sorbents in Coal-Derived Flue Gas. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 4734-4739.
349
(26) Hsi, H. C.; Chen, C. T. Influences of Acidic/Oxidizing Gases on Elemental Mercury Adsorption
350
Equilibrium and Kinetics of Sulfur-impregnated Activated Carbon. Fuel 2012, 98, 229-235.
351
(27) Presto, A. A.; Granite, E. J. Impact of Sulfur Oxides on Mercury Capture by Activated Carbon.
352
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41 (18), 6579-6584.
353
(28) Eswaran, S.; Stenger, H. G.; Fan, Z. Gas-phase Mercury Adsorption Rate Studies. Energy Fuels
354
2007, 21 (2), 852-857.
355
(29) Laudal, D. L.; Brown, T. D.; Nott, B. R. Effects of Flue Gas Constituents on Mercury Speciation.
356
Fuel Process. Technol. 2000, 65, 157-165.
357
(30) Li, Y.; Murphy, P. D.; Wu, C. Y.; Powers, K. W.; Bonzongo, J. C. J. Development of
358
Silica/Vanadia/Titania Catalysts for Removal of Elemental Mercury from Coal-Combustion Flue Gas.
359
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42 (14), 5304-5309.
360
(31) Garin, F. Mechanism of NOx Decomposition. Appl. Catal. A- Gen. 2001, 222 (1-2), 183-219.
361
(32) Li, H.; Wu, C. Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J. Superior Activity of MnOx-CeO2/TiO2 Catalyst for Catalytic
362
Oxidation of Elemental Mercury at Low Flue Gas Temperatures. Appl. Catal. B- Environ.2012, 111-112
363
(0), 381-388.
364
(33) Stolle, R.; Koeser, H.; Gutberlet, H. Oxidation and Reduction of Mercury by SCR DeNOx
365
Catalysts under Flue Gas Conditions in Coal Fired Power Plants. Appl. Catal. B- Environ. 2014, 144 (0),
366
486-497.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
18
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 20 of 30
367
(34) Li, H.; Wu, S.; Wu, C. Y.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Shih, K., SCR Atmosphere Induced Reduction of
368
Oxidized Mercury over CuO-CeO2/TiO2 Catalyst. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (12), 7373-7379.
369
(35) Zhao, Y. X.; Mann, M. D.; Olson, E. S.; Pavlish, J. H.; Dunham, G. E. Effects of Sulfur Dioxide
370
and Nitric Oxide on Mercury Oxidation and Reduction under Homogeneous Conditions. J. Air Waste
371
Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56 (5), 628-635.
372
(36) Naskar, M. K.; Patra, A.; Chatterjee, M. Understanding the Role of Surfactants on the Preparation
373
of ZnS Nanocrystals. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 297 (1), 271-275.
374
(37) Hadjiivanov, K.; Bushev, V.; Kantcheva, M.; Klissurski, D. Infrared Spectroscopy Study of the
375
Species Arising During Nitrogen Dioxide Adsorption on Titania (Anatase). Langmuir 1994, 10 (2), 464-
376
471.
377
(38) Siriwardane, R. V.; Woodruff, S. FTIR Characterization of the Interaction of Oxygen with Zinc
378
Sulfide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34 (2), 699-702.
379
(39) Konishi, M.; Isobe, T.; Senna, M. Enhancement of Photoluminescence of ZnS : Mn Nanocrystals
380
by Hybridizing with Polymerized Acrylic Acid. J. Lumin. 2001, 93 (1), 1-8.
381
(40) Olson, E. S.; Crocker, C. R.; Benson, S. A.; Pavlish, J. H.; Holmes, M. J. Surface Compositions of
382
Carbon Sorbents Exposed to Simulated Low-Rank Coal Flue Gases. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005,
383
55 (6), 747-754.
384
(41) Barreca, D.; Gasparotto, A.; Maragno, C.; Tondello, E.; Spalding, T. R. Analysis of
385
Nanocrystalline ZnS Thin Films by XPS. Surf. Sci. Spectra 2002, 9 (1), 54-61.
386
(42) Saha, A.; Abram, D. N.; Kuhl, K. P.; Paradis, J.; Crawford, J. L.; Sasmaz, E.; Chang, R.; Jaramillo,
387
T. F.; Wilcox, J. An X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of Surface Changes on Brominated and
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
19
Page 21 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
388
Sulfur-Treated Activated Carbon Sorbents during Mercury Capture: Performance of Pellet versus Fiber
389
Sorbents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (23), 13695-13701.
390
(43) Laumb, J. D.; Benson, S. A.; Olson, E. A. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Analysis of Mercury
391
Sorbent Surface Chemistry. Fuel Process. Technol. 2004, 85 (6-7), 577-585.
392
(44) Rumayor, M.; Fernandez-Miranda, N.; Lopez-Anton, M. A.; Diaz-Somoano, M.; Martinez-
393
Tarazona, M. R. Application of Mercury Temperature Programmed Desorption (HgTPD) to Ascertain
394
Mercury/Char Interactions. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 132, 9-14.
395
(45) Rumayor, M.; Lopez-Anton, M. A.; Díaz-Somoano, M.; Martínez-Tarazona, M. R. A New
396
Approach to Mercury Speciation in Solids Using A Thermal Desorption Technique. Fuel 2015, 160,
397
525-530.
398
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
20
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 22 of 30
399
List of Figures
400
Figure 1. Effect of NOx on Hg0 adsorption on Nano-ZnS at 180°C.
401
Figure 2. Desorption of Hg0 from Nano-ZnS loaded with Hg0 by NOx.
402
Figure 3. Hg0 adsorption over NO- and NOx-pretreated Nano-ZnS.
403
Figure 4. Desorption of Hg0 from Nano-ZnS loaded with HgS by NOx.
404
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of Nano-ZnS used for Hg0 adsorption in presence of NOx: (a) fresh Nano-ZnS;
405
(b) used Nano-ZnS (under NO); (c) used Nano-ZnS (under NO + O2).
406
Figure 6. S2p (a) and O1s (b) XPS spectra of Nano-ZnS used for Hg0 adsorption in presence of NOx.
407
Figure 7. Induced reduction of pure HgS by NOx.
408
Figure 8. TPD spectra of Nano-ZnS used for Hg0 adsorption in presence of NOx.
409
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
21
Page 23 of 30
410
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 1. Effect of NOX on Hg0 adsorption on the Nano-ZnS at 180 °C
0
Normalized outlet Hg concentration
1.0 N2 N2 + 4% O2 N2 + 300 ppm NO N2 + 1000 ppm NO N2 + 300 ppm NO + 4% O2 N2 + 1000 ppm NO + 4% O2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0 0
411
1
2 Time (h)
3
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
22
Environmental Science & Technology
412
Page 24 of 30
Figure 2. Desorption of Hg0 from Nano-ZnS loaded with mercury by NOX 40 Outlet Hg0 concentration (µg/m3)
With Hg feed
Without Hg feed
Pure N2
Add different flue gas 1000 ppm NO + 4% O 2
30
1000 ppm NO pure N2
20
10
0 0
413
20
40
60
80
100
120
Time (min)
414
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
23
Page 25 of 30
415
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 3. Hg0 adsorption over NO and NOX pretreated Nano-ZnS
0
Normalized outlet Hg concentration
1.0 Fresh ZnS Pretreated ZnS (by O2) Pretreated ZnS (by NO) Pretreated ZnS (by NO + O2)
.8
.6
.4
.2
0.0 0
416
1
2
3
4
Time (h)
417 418
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
24
Environmental Science & Technology
419
Page 26 of 30
Figure 4. Desorption of Hg0 from Nano-ZnS loaded with HgS by NOX
Outlet Hg0 concentration (¦Ìg/m3)
Pure N2
With different gases added
40 1000 ppm NO 1000 ppm NO + 4% O2
30
20
10
0 0
420
20
40
60 80 Time (min)
100
120
140
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
25
Page 27 of 30
421
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of Nano-ZnS used for Hg0 adsorption in the presence of NOX: (a) Fresh Nano-
422
ZnS; (b) Used Nano-ZnS (under NO); (c) Used Nano-ZnS (under NO + O2)
Transmittance (%)
(a)
1621 1388 1117 796 618
(b)
(c)
4000
423
3430
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
-1
Wavenumbers (cm )
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
26
Environmental Science & Technology
424
Page 28 of 30
Figure 6. XPS spectra of S2p, O1s of Nano-ZnS used for Hg0 adsorption in the presence of NOX (a)
S 2p (S2-)
Intensity (a.u.)
Fresh Nano-ZnS Used Nano-ZnS (under NO) Used Nano-ZnS (under NO + O2)
S 2p (SO42-)
174
172
170
425
168 166 164 162 Binding energy (eV)
158
156
Fresh Nano-ZnS Used Nano-ZnS (under NO) Used Nano-ZnS (under NO + O2)
O 1s
Intensity (a.u.)
(b)
160
526
426
528
530
532
534
536
538
Binding energy (eV)
427
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
27
Page 29 of 30
428
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 7. Induced reduction of pure HgS by NOX Pure N2
Outlet Hg0 concentration (µg/m3)
60
With different gases added
50 40 30 20 1000 ppm NO 1000 ppm NO + 4% O2
10 0
0
429
20
40
60 Time (min)
80
100
120
430
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
28
Environmental Science & Technology
431
Page 30 of 30
Figure 8. TPD spectra of Nano-ZnS used for Hg0 adsorption in the presence of NOX
0
Used Nano-ZnS (under NO + O2+ Hg ) 0
Used Nano-ZnS (under NO + Hg ) Used Nano-ZnS (under N2+ Hg0)
Mercury Signal
Fresh Nano-ZnS
0
432
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature (oC)
433
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
29