Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF DURHAM
Article
Effects of chain length and degree of unsaturation of fatty acids on structure and in vitro digestibility of starch-protein-fatty acid complexes Mengge Zheng, Chen Chao, Jinglin Yu, Les Copeland, Shuo Wang, and Shujun Wang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04779 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Feb 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 13, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Effects of chain length and degree of unsaturation of fatty acids on structure and in vitro digestibility of starch-protein-fatty acid complexes
Mengge Zhengab, Chen Chaoab, Jinglin Yua, Les Copelandc, Shuo Wanga*, Shujun Wangab*
a
State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
b
College of Food Engineering and Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
c
The University of Sydney, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, NSW Australia 2006
* Corresponding authors: Dr. Shuo Wang or Dr. Shujun Wang Tel: 86-22-60912486; Fax: 86-22-60912489; E-mail:
[email protected] or
[email protected] 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Abstract: The effects of chain length and degree of unsaturation of fatty acids (FAs)
2
on structure and in vitro digestibility of starch-protein-FA complexes were
3
investigated in model systems. Studies with the Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) showed
4
that the formation of ternary complex resulted in higher viscosities than those of
5
binary complex during the cooling and holding stages. The results of Differential
6
Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Raman and X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that the
7
structural differences for ternary complexes were much less than those for binary
8
complexes. Starch-protein-FA complexes presented lower in vitro enzymatic
9
digestibility compared with starch-FAs complexes. We conclude that shorter chain
10
and lower unsaturation FAs favor the formation of ternary complexes, but decrease
11
the thermal stability of these complexes. FAs had a smaller effect on the ordered
12
structures of ternary complexes than on those of binary complexes, and little effect on
13
enzymatic digestibility of both binary and ternary complexes.
14 15 16
Keywords: starch-protein-fatty acid complexes; starch-fatty acid complexes; fatty
17
acid chain length; fatty acid unsaturation; in vitro digestibility
18 19 20 21 22 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 36
Page 3 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
23
INTRODUCTION
24
Many cereal-based foodstuffs are composed of starch, proteins and lipids. Interactions
25
among these macronutrients during processing influence significantly quality
26
characteristics of finished foods, such as flavor, texture, mouth-feel and digestibility.
27
Amylose can form helical inclusion complexes with various types of lipids, naturally
28
or during food processing.1-4 As has been shown in many studies, the formation of
29
these complexes reduces the solubility and swelling power of starch in water, alters
30
the rheological properties of starch pastes, increases gelatinization temperature,
31
reduces gel rigidity, retards retrogradation and reduces the susceptibility to enzymic
32
hydrolysis.5-7 Both chain length and degree of unsaturation of fatty acids have been
33
shown to affect the structure and functional properties of starch-fatty acid
34
complexes.8-14
35 36
Ternary interactions between starch, lipids and proteins have been demonstrated using
37
Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA) and high performance size exclusion chromatography
38
(HPSEC) studies.15-18 The functional properties of the starch in the complexes were
39
shown to be altered.19 Studies with laser confocal micro-Raman (LCM-Raman)
40
spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray Diffraction
41
(XRD) showed that starch, β-lactoglobulin and fatty acids formed a more ordered
42
V-type crystalline structure compared with the respective binary starch-fatty acid
43
complexes.20 The digestibility of starch, as the most important glycemic carbohydrate
44
in foods, is of considerable interest nutritionally in relation to the increasing incidence 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
45
of obesity and diet-related chronic diseases. However, the digestibility of starch in
46
processed foods is not well understood, especially the susceptibility of complexes
47
between starch, lipids and proteins to enzymic breakdown, and potential implications
48
for human nutrition. Starch digestibility in processed foods is affected by interactions
49
with other constituents,19 but does not seem to be correlated closely with the degree of
50
starch gelatinization.21 Hence, there is a need for a greater understanding of
51
interactions between starch, lipids and proteins, and of the properties of resulting
52
complexes that may form. In particular, there is little information on the effect of
53
chain length and degree of unsaturation of fatty acids on the formation of ternary
54
complexes involving starch, lipids and proteins.
55 56
Hence, the objectives of the present study were to use a model system to investigate
57
the effects of structural attributes of FAs on the formation, structure and in vitro
58
enzymatic digestibility of model starch-protein-fatty acids complexes, and to compare
59
the properties of these complexes with the corresponding starch-FA complexes. This
60
information is essential to developing an understanding of the interactions between
61
macronutrients during food processing and of the bioavailability of these
62
macronutrients for human nutrition.
63 64
MATERIALS AND METHODS
65
Materials
66
Maize starch (MS, 10.2% moisture and 22.7% amylose content), β-lactoglobulin (βLG, 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 36
Page 5 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
67
from bovine milk, ≥90%), octanoic acid (C8:0, OcA), decanoic acid (C10:0, DA),
68
lauric acid (C12:0, LA), myristic acid (C14:0, MA), palmitic acid (C16:0, PA), stearic
69
acid (C18:0, SA), oleic acid (C18:1, OA) and linoleic acid (C18:2, LiA), porcine
70
pancreatic α-amylase (PPA, A3176, EC 3.2.1.1, type VI-B from porcine pancreas, 16
71
units/mg) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo., U.S.A.).
72
Amyloglucosidase
73
oxidase/peroxide, GOPOD) were purchased from Megazyme International Ireland Ltd.
74
(Bray Co., Wicklow, Ireland). All other chemical reagents were of analytical grade
75
and were from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Corporation (Shanghai, China).
(AMG,
3260
U/mL),
D-Glucose
Assay
Kit
(glucose
76 77
Rapid Viscosity Analysis (RVA)
78
The pasting profiles of MS-FA and MS-βLG-FA mixtures were determined using a
79
Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA-4) (Perten Instruments Australia, Macquarie Park, NSW,
80
Australia) according to the method described elsewhere.20 Maize starch (2.0 g, wet
81
weight), FAs (100 mg) and βLG (200 mg) were weighed accurately into a RVA
82
canister and deionised water was added to make a total weight of 28.0 g.
83
The pasting profiles of the mixtures were monitored according to the STD 1 protocol
84
supplied with the instrument. Briefly, starch slurries were held at 50 °C for 1 min
85
before heating at a rate of 12°C /min to 95 °C, holding at 95 °C for 3 min, and then
86
cooling at a rate of 12 °C /min to 50 °C and held at 50°C for 4 min. The speed of the
87
mixing paddle was 960 rpm for the first 10 s, then 160 rpm for the remainder of the
88
experiment. Pastes of MS were prepared by the same protocol and used as the 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
89
reference. The RVA pastes were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after the
90
conclusion of the protocol, freeze-dried, ground into powder using a mortar and pestle,
91
and passed through a 150 µm sieve. The resulting powders were stored in sealed
92
containers at 4 °C for further structural characterization and in vitro enzymatic
93
digestibility analysis.
94 95
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
96
Thermal properties of MS-FA and MS-βLG-FA mixtures were examined using a
97
differential scanning calorimeter (200 F3, Netzsch, Germany) equipped with a
98
thermal data analysis station. The sample preparation was as described in our previous
99
study.20 Samples (3 mg) were weighed accurately into 40 µL aluminum pans, and
100
deionized water or the appropriate amount of βLG solution was added to give a
101
samples/water (or βLG solution) ratio of 1:3 (w/w) and to obtain a MS/βLG/FA ratio
102
of 20:2:1 (w/w/w) or a MS/FA ratio of 20:1 (w/w). The pans were sealed, equilibrated
103
overnight at room temperature, and heated from 20 to 120 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min.
104
After heating, the gelatinized samples were cooled to 20 °C at 5 °C/min, and the pans
105
were reheated without delay to 120 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. An empty pan was used
106
as the reference. The thermal transition parameters (onset (To), peak (Tp), conclusion
107
(Tc) temperatures and enthalpy change (∆H)) for MS, MS-FA and MS-βLG-FA
108
mixtures were determined from the data recording software.
109 110
Laser Confocal Micro-Raman (LCM-Raman) Spectroscopy 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 36
Page 7 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
111
The short-range molecular order of MS-FA and MS-βLG-FA complexes obtained
112
from the RVA was determined using a Renishaw Invia Raman microscope system
113
(Renishaw, Gloucestershire, UK) equipped with a Leica microscope (Leica
114
Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany); a 785 nm green diode laser source was used. The
115
spectra from 3200 to 100 cm-1 were collected from at least five different positions on
116
each sample with a resolution of approximately 7 cm-1. The full width at half
117
maximum (FWHM) of the band at 480 cm-1 was obtained using the WiRE 2.0
118
software to characterize the short-range molecular order of complex samples.22
119 120
Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy
121
The FTIR spectra of complexes obtained from the RVA were obtained using a Tensor
122
27 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) equipped with a KBr beam splitter and a
123
DLaTGS detector. The samples were ground with KBr powder at a ratio of 1:150
124
(w/w), and the fine powders were pressed into transparent pellets and examined by
125
the transmission method. The spectra were scanned in the range of 4000 to 400 cm−1
126
at room temperature, with an accumulation of 64 scans and at a resolution of 4 cm-1.23
127 128
X-ray Diffraction (XRD)
129
The crystallinity of complexes obtained from the RVA was determined using a
130
D/max-2500vk/pc X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with a
131
Cu-Kα source (λ = 0.154 nm) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. The samples were
132
equilibrated over a saturated NaCl solution at room temperature for one week before 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
133
measurement. The moisture-equilibrated samples were packed tightly in round glass
134
cells and examined over the range of 5o to 30o (2θ) at a scanning rate of 2o/min and a
135
step size of 0.02°.
136 137
In Vitro Enzymatic Digestibility
138
The in vitro enzymatic digestibility of MS-FA and MS-βLG-FA complexes was
139
analyzed based on Englyst’s method24 and according to the procedure of Wang et al25
140
with minor modifications as follows. The mixture of hydrolytic enzymes consisted of
141
porcine pancreatic α-amylase (PPA) and amyloglucosidase (AMG). According to the
142
manufacturer’s instructions, PPA solution was prepared by suspending 1.22 g of PPA
143
(16 U/mg) in 11.9 mL deionized water at 37 oC with magnetic stirring for 10 min. The
144
mixture was centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 min and 0.1 mL of AMG was added to 8.0
145
mL of the supernatant. Samples of the complexes (100 mg, dry weight basis) were
146
dispersed in 25 mL sodium acetate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6) containing 6.67 mmol/L
147
CaCl2, and 5 mL of enzyme mixture containing 8228 U PPA and 204 U AMG was
148
added. The complex-enzyme mixtures were incubated at 37 °C with stirring at 260
149
rpm for 2 h. Aliquots (0.2 mL) of the hydrolysate were withdrawn at specific time
150
points (from 0 to 120 min), and mixed with 0.8 mL of absolute ethanol to stop
151
enzyme reactions. After centrifuging at 13000 rpm for 3 min, the supernatant was
152
used to determine the glucose content by the Megazyme GOPOD kit. The hydrolysis
153
percentages of starch samples were calculated from the amount of glucose produced
154
(multiplied by 0.9 to convert to the anhydro-glucosyl form) divided by the initial 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 36
Page 9 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
155
amount of glucose equivalents in the starch.
156 157
Statistical Analysis
158
All results were measured at least in triplicate (three samples were used), and the
159
results are reported as the mean values and standard deviations. In the case of XRD,
160
only one measurement was performed. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
161
followed by post-hoc Duncan’s multiple range tests (p 0.05). ND, not detected
28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table3. FWHM of the Raman Band at 480 cm-1 of MS-FA and MS-βLG-FA Complexes. FWHM at 480 cm-1
Types of FAs MS-FA
MS-βLG-FA
OcA
17.09±0.08b
16.26±0.24a
DA
16.55±0.16a
16.17±0.29a
LA
16.44±0.37a
16.15±0.17a
MA
16.59±0.15a
16.51±0.44ab
PA
18.63±0.10c
16.30±0.23a
SA
20.27±0.13d
16.78±0.31b
OA
20.06±0.26d
17.32±0.30c
LiA
18.53±0.10c
16.35±0.21a
Values are means ± SD. Means with similar letters in a column do not differ significantly (p > 0.05).
29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 30 of 36
Figure 1
100
MS MS-OcA MS-DA MS-LA MS-MA MS-PA MS-SA MS-OA MS-LiA
2500
Viscosity(cP)
2000 1500
A 90
80
70
1000 60 500
Temperature(oC)
3000
50
0
40
-500 -1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time(min)
4000 3500
Viscosity(cP)
100
MS MS-βLG-OcA MS-βLG-DA MS-βLG-LA MS-βLG-MA MS-βLG-PA MS-βLG-SA MS-βLG-OA MS-βLG-LiA
3000 2500
B 90
80
2000
70
1500 60
1000 500
50
0 -500
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time(min)
30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
40
Temperature(oC)
4500
Page 31 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2
9
A
MS-LiA
-1.4
B
MS-LiA
MS-OA
MS-OA
8
7
MS-PA 6
MS-MA
MS-SA
-1.6
DSC flow
DSC flow
MS-SA
MS-PA -1.8
MS-MA MS-LA
MS-LA
5
-2.0
MS-DA
MS-DA
4
MS-OcA
MS-OcA
3 30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
-2.2 20
130
30
40
60
70
80
C
MS-βLG-LiA
-1.0
100
D
MS-βLG-LiA MS-βLG-OA
MS-βLG-OA
8
-1.2
MS-βLG-SA
MS-βLG-SA 7
-1.4
MS-βLG-PA 6
MS-βLG-MA MS-βLG-LA
5
MS-βLG-DA 4
DSC flow
DSC flow
90
Temperature( C)
Temperature( C)
9
50
o
o
MS-βLG-PA -1.6
MS-βLG-MA -1.8
MS-βLG-LA MS-βLG-DA
-2.0
MS-βLG-OcA
MS-βLG-OcA -2.2
3 30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
20
o
30
40
50
60
70 o
Temperature( C)
Temperature( C)
31
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
80
90
100
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 32 of 36
Figure 3
A MS-LiA
Relative Intensity
100000
MS-OA MS-SA MS-PA
50000
MS-MA MS-LA 0
MS-DA MS-OcA -50000 3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
500
0
-1 Wavenumbers(cm )
B MS-βLG-LiA 100000
Relative Intensity
MS-βLG-OA MS-βLG-SA MS-βLG-PA
50000
MS-βLG-MA MS-βLG-LA MS-βLG-DA
0
MS-βLG-OcA 3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
-1 Wavenumbers(cm )
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 33 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4
150
A
MS-LiA MS-OA
Transmittrance intensity
100
MS-SA MS-PA
50
MS-MA MS-LA
0
MS-DA MS-OcA
-50 -1
1710cm
-1
2857cm -100 3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-1 Wavenumbers(cm )
250
B
MS-βLG-LiA
Transmittrance intensity
MS-βLG-OA 200
MS-βLG-SA MS-βLG-PA
150
MS-βLG-MA MS-βLG-LA
100
MS-βLG-DA MS-βLG-OcA
50 -1
-1
0 3500
1540cm
2846cm 3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
-1 Wavenumbers(cm )
33
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
500
0
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 34 of 36
Figure 5
Diffraction intensity (cps)
7000 6000
LiA
5000
OA
4000
SA
3000
PA
2000
MA
1000
LA DA
0
OcA
-1000 5
10
15
20
Diffraction angle (2θ)
34
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
25
30
Page 35 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 6
100
Hydrolysis percentage(%)
A 80
60
MS MS-OcA MS-DA MS-LA MS-MA MS-PA MS-SA MS-OA MS-LiA
40
20
0 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Time(min)
100
Hydrolysis percentage(%)
B 80
60
MS MS-β LG-OcA MS-β LG-DA MS-β LG-LA MS-β LG-MA MS-β LG-PA MS-β LG-SA MS-β LG-OA MS-β LG-LiA
40
20
0 0
20
40
60
80
Time(min)
35
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
100
120
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 36 of 36
Table of Contents Graphic
7000
MS
MS
FAs
MS-βLG-LiA MS-LiA(C18:2) MS-βLG-OA MS-OA(C18:1) MS-βLG-SA MS-SA(C18:0) MS-βLG-PA MS-PA(C16:0)
6000
Diffraction intensity (cps)
Binary complex
FAs
5000 4000 3000 2000
MS-βLG-MA 1000
MS-MA(C14:0) MS-βLG-LA MS-LA(C12:0)
0 -1000 5
10
15
20
25
30
Diffraction angle (2θ)
MS
β-LG
β-LG
FAs
Ternary complex
Hydrolysis percentage(%)
100
80
60
40
MS MS-MA(C14:0) MS-β LG-MA
20
0 0
20
40
60
80
Time(min)
36
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
100
120