Effects of Microwave Irradiation on Combustion and Sodium Release

Sep 20, 2016 - Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering & Institute of Energy Futures, Brunel University London, Uxbridge. UB8 3PH, U...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Northern Illinois University

Article

Effects of microwave irradiation on combustion and sodium-release characteristics of Zhundong lignite Zhi-hua Wang, Yingzu Liu, Yong He, Ronald Whiddon, Kaidi Wan, Jun Xia, and Jian-zhong Liu Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01494 • Publication Date (Web): 20 Sep 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 22, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

2

Effects of microwave irradiation on combustion and sodium-release characteristics of Zhundong lignite

3

Zhihua Wang†, Yingzu Liu†,‡, Yong He*,†, Ronald Whiddon†, Kaidi Wan†,‡, Jun Xia‡, Jianzhong

4

Liu†

1

5



State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, P.R.China

6 7



Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering & Institute of Energy Futures, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK

8 9

*

Corresponding author: Tel: +86-571-87952111, E-mail: [email protected] (Y. He)

10

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

11

ABSTRACT Lignite can be upgraded by using microwave irradiation (MI), which may change

12

physical and chemical properties of the coal, affecting its combustion characteristics. In this work,

13

MI was used to upgrade coal samples and the changes in combustion characteristics of the

14

upgraded coal samples were analyzed by the thermal gravity analysis (TGA) and surface

15

temperature measurement. The method of sequential extraction was employed to investigate the

16

changes of various Na classes in different coal samples, and Laser-induced breakdown

17

spectroscopy (LIBS) was then used to measure the temporal sodium release during combustion of

18

the different coal samples. Results show that the MI process significantly reduces the moisture

19

concentration, thereby increasing the carbon content and calorific value of the coal. The decrease

20

of the oxygen to carbon atomic ratio (IO/C) indicates an improvement of the coal rank. The TGA

21

shows that the upgrading process will delay the combustion process towards higher temperatures.

22

The comprehensive combustion parameter calculated from the TGA shows the combustion

23

performance of upgraded coal samples became worse, which is also seconded by the measured

24

surface temperatures.

25

MI produces inter-conversion among different sodium classes, particularly between

26

NH4Ac-soluble sodium and water-soluble sodium. The sodium release characteristics are similar

27

to the surface temperature profiles, indicating that, despite the MI process, sodium release is

28

predominantly controlled by the combustion process. However, the MI process is found to

29

increase both the mass fraction of sodium in coal samples and the amount of sodium release

30

during the combustion process.

31

KEYWORDS: Lignite, Upgrading, Coal rank, LIBS, Sodium. 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 29

Page 3 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

32

Energy & Fuels

1 INTRODUCTION

33

Since the compositions of coal vary considerably with the environment at the time of

34

formation and the aging process, coal can be categorized into different ranks: from high-rank

35

anthracite with a high carbon-hydrogen ratio to low-rank lignite, which contains large proportions

36

of volatile matter and water. In China, low-rank coal takes up 41.18 % of the total coal reserves 1.

37

As the energy demand grows, depletion of high-rank coal has necessitated the exploitation of

38

low-rank coals. Identified major issues such as low burning efficiency and corrosion are

39

associated with the utilization of lignite due to its low calorific value, high proportions of mineral

40

matter and moisture. For example, Bosoaga A. et al.

41

combustion temperature and pollutant emissions in a 1 MW furnace when burning Romanian

42

lignite. They found the moisture in coal can make the temperature at furnace center obviously

43

lower and concluded that drying the moist lignite before combustion was required to enhance

44

power plant efficiency. Fernandez-Turiel et al.

45

lignite combustion is caused by thermal decomposition of calcite in the lignite.

3

2

investigated moisture effects on the

believed that the corrosion of high-calcium

46

Reduction in the calorific value of low-rank coals due to moisture can be mitigated by

47

upgrading procedures that remove moisture 1. Microwave irradiation (MI) has been widely used

48

for promoting the coal rank. Unlike traditional thermal dehydration methods, MI uses

49

electromagnetic radiation to quickly heat coal internally

50

procedure has many advantages, including: (1) non-contact heating, (2) energy transfer instead of

51

heat transfer, (3) rapid heating, (4) selective material heating, (5) volumetric heating, (6) rapid

4-6

. According to Kazi 7, the MI

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 29

52

on/off transition, (7) heating from the interior of the material body, (8) a higher level of safety

53

and automation. However, using MI dewatering to upgrade coal will not only dehydrate the coal

54

but also lead to changes in coal’s physicochemical properties. Lester and Kingman

55

the expansion of moisture within the coal matrix as the mechanism for causing cracks and

56

breakage that may change the coal’s physicochemical properties. Recently, a number of

57

investigations have been presented on various effects of MI upgrading, such as dewatering

58

efficacy 1, ash reduction 9, sulfur species reduction 10 and improvement in grinding characteristics

59

11

60

combustion have not been reported.

6, 8

suggested

. However, to the authors’ best knowledge, effects of MI power and time on low-rank coal

61

In addition to aforementioned identified disadvantages, another major issue of burning

62

low-rank coals from specific regions of China is due to alkali species. These minor species can be

63

incorporated in coal as discrete mineral particles and ion-exchangeable cations 12. Alkali species

64

can be particularly problematic, as they lead to severe fouling and corrosion problems in coal

65

combustion applications

66

mineral particles and promote ash coalescence or agglomeration during combustion. As the

67

temperature in the exhaust plume reduces, the aerosolized alkali metal will condense on heat

68

transfer surfaces and lead to corrosion/erosion problems

69

reacting dynamics, much work has been done to measure the amount and release characteristics

70

of the alkali species during coal combustion, such as: (1) identifying different classes of sodium

71

in coal, (2) in-situ measurement of sodium release during coal combustion, (3) reaction

72

mechanism of sodium in the gas phase. These investigations have shown that many alkali metals

13-16

. According to Miller

16

, alkalis may reduce the melting point of

14, 17

. In order to better understand their

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

18-23

73

are readily released during coal combustion

. However, little work has been done on sodium

74

release characteristics of upgraded low-rank coal, a better understanding of which is essential for

75

mitigating fouling and corrosion of heat transfer surfaces within industrial coal-fired boilers and

76

sustained use of low-rank coals.

77

Due to the above motivations, another objective of the present study is to investigate the

78

sodium release characteristics during combustion of Zhundong lignite upgraded by microwave

79

irradiation. Our work therefore focuses on the influence of upgrading by microwave irradiation

80

on characteristics of coal combustion and sodium release during the combustion. The reported

81

results are useful for understanding the change in combustion of low-rank coals and alkali metal

82

release of upgraded low-rank coals. In this study, microwave irradiation has been used to upgrade

83

low-rank coal. The coal samples were exposed to MI with varying durations and power. The

84

technique of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was employed to measure the sodium

85

release during the combustion of the upgraded coal. LIBS is a technique for in-situ species

86

measurement of gas, liquids and solids 24. For coal/biomass combustion, LIBS is commonly used

87

for coal sample analysis, ash analysis, and to measure sodium/potassium release 25-27. A benefit of

88

the LIBS process is that species are broken into their elemental components by laser plasma,

89

meaning that the signal arises from all respective conformations of a species in the measurement

90

region. In addition, as the characteristic timescale of LIBS measurement is small, it can be used

91

to monitor the time-resolved release of Na above a burning coal particle, which is not influenced

92

by scattering, allowing proper measurement during all phases of coal combustion.

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

93

2 EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY

94

2.1 COAL SAMPLES. The low-rank coal used in this study was from the Zhundong region,

95

which contains coal reserves of 164 Giga-tons and is one of the largest coal-producing areas in

96

China

97

particles. The coal was then upgraded by MI using various combinations of irradiation energy,

98

resulting in 4 sample groups: the raw coal and coal upgraded for 1 minute at 500 W

99

(500W&1min), 5 minutes at 500 W (500W&5min) and 1 minute at 800 W (800W&1min). The

100

sample groups were prepared for surface temperature and LIBS measurement by pressing 50 mg

101

of the respective sample into a 4 mm diameter pellet. In the present study, each experiment was

102

repeated three times. Error bars that were calculated from the three measurements have now been

103

supplied in all the figures where applicable. The difference between the three measurements is

104

generally minor.

28

. In this study, the raw coal samples were crushed and sieved to select sub 75 µm coal

105

2.2 MICROWAVE IRRADIATION PROCESS. Microwave irradiation experiments were

106

carried out in a microwave reaction workstation (MAS-II; Sineo Microwave Chemistry

107

Technology Ltd., Shanghai, China) at atmospheric pressure using a microwave frequency of 2450

108

MHz. Approximately 20 g of raw coal was spread over the bottom of a Pyrex flask under a

109

nitrogen gas flow of 0.3 L/min to prohibit oxidation. The raw coal samples were irradiated for

110

either 1 min. or 5 min. durations at a power of 500 W and for 1 min. at 800 W to achieve different

111

levels of upgrading.

112

2.3 THERMO-GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS (TGA). The combustion characteristics of

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 29

Page 7 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

113

coal samples were evaluated by the TGA using a TA-Q500 apparatus (TA Company, USA).

114

Analysis was performed using 10 mg samples. The air flow rate was 30 ml/min and the heating

115

rate was 10 K/min. The combustion-related parameters such as the ignition temperature (Ti), the

116

burnout temperature (Tb), the temperature (Tmax) at which the mass-loss rate of the burning coal

117

particle is maximum, the maximum (kmax) and average (kmean) mass loss rates can be obtained

118

from the TGA and differential thermal analysis (DTA) curves

119

comprehensive combustion parameter can be calculated to demonstrate the ignition, combustion,

120

and burnout properties of coal 30-32. The comprehensive combustion parameter S is defined as: =

121 122

29

. Using these parameters, a

 × 

×

(1)

At the beginning of coal combustion, the reaction is controlled by kinetics. According to the Arrhenius equation, the rate k (mg/min) of a solid-state reaction can be described as follows:  =  × exp−/ 

(2)

123

where A is the pre-exponential Arrhenius factor, min-1; E is the activation energy, kJ/mol; T is the

124

temperature, K; R is the gas constant 8.314 J/(mol·K). Therefore at the ignition point,    × =        1   ×  × × × = ×  × =   





×

(3) (4)

125

In Equation (4), R/E is the activation energy of coal combustion; dki/dTi defines the reaction rate

126

at the ignition point, a higher value indicating a greater possibility of ignition; kmax/ki is the ratio

127

of the highest burning speed to the ignition burning speed; kmean/Tb is the ratio of the average

128

burning speed to the burnout temperature, a higher value indicating the coal is easier to burnout.

129

2.4 IDENTIFICATION OF SODIUM CLASSES. The sequential extraction method 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

33

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

130

was used to investigate the classes of Na in Zhundong coal before and after microwave upgrading.

131

Sodium compounds were distinguished by their solubility by stepwise extraction using water, 1

132

mol/L ammonium acetate and 1 mol/L hydrochloric acid. The detailed sequential extraction

133

procedure was as follows: 1 g of the coal sample was added to 100 ml deionized water at 333 K

134

and stored for 24 hours. It should be mentioned that due to the loss of mass by dehydration, the

135

actual mass of the upgraded coal sample was slightly less than 1 g. The coal-water mixture was

136

filtered to separate the filtrate that contains water-soluble Na from the coal sample. Next, the

137

same coal sample was added to 100 ml of 1 mol/L NH4Ac and then HCl (1 mol/L, 100 ml) and

138

processed in a similar manner to the water extraction. After the sequential extraction experiments,

139

each 0.1 g insoluble sample was digested by a solution of HCl (12 mol/L, 2 ml), HNO3 (14.5

140

mol/L, 6 ml) and HF (33.3 mol/L, 2 ml). The digested solution was then diluted with deionized

141

water to a volume of 100 ml for analysis. The solutions formed in each step were analyzed by

142

inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) to determine the amount of

143

Na in each class.

144 145 146 147 148 149 150

From these extractions, it was found that the sodium compounds in coal could be divided into four classes 12, 33, 34: • Water-soluble: this class of sodium is water-soluble salt inside the pore structure, such as sodium chloride, sulfate etc. • NH4Ac-soluble: NH4Ac can leach the sodium, which will then appear as exchangeable ions that are organically connected with carboxyl groups. • HCl-soluble: this form of sodium is organically bonded with nitrogen- or oxygen-containing 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 29

Page 9 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

151 152

Energy & Fuels

functional groups. • Insoluble: this class of sodium is believed to be stable silicate minerals.

153

2.5 LIBS MEASUREMENT OF NA RELEASE. The coal pellet was suspended on two

154

ceramic rods (d = 1 mm) at a height of 10 mm above a flat flame burner. The details of the burner

155

can be found in Ref.

156

equivalence ratio of 0.8 with 0.59 SL/min methane and 7.06 SL/min air. The flame temperature

157

was calculated to be ~1892 K. The gas composition in the region of the coal pellet was estimated

158

to be: 3.9% O2, 7.6% CO2, 15.4% H2O and 72.8% N2, based on CHEMKIN calculations.

35

. The burner was operated with a premixed methane/air flame at an

159

The LIBS system employed to measure the Na release during coal combustion is shown in

160

Fig. 1. An Nd:YAG laser (Model RPO-250, Spectra Physics, USA) at the fundamental

161

wavelength of 1064 nm and the repetition rate of 10 Hz was used. The pulse duration was 10 ns

162

and the energy of each pulse was 300 mJ. The laser beam, the initial diameter of which is 10 mm,

163

was focused by a quartz lens (f = 200 mm) into the gas plume at 10 mm above the coal pellet.

164

A compact spectrometer (Ocean Optics, USB4000) was used to record the LIBS spectrum.

165

The focal length and diameter of the collecting lens were 60 mm and 50 mm, respectively. The

166

spectrometer was synchronized to the laser by a pulse generator (Stanford Research System,

167

DG535). The optimal delay and exposure time were determined to be 2 µs and 4 ms, respectively;

168

using these values, background signal from the continuum emission at the beginning of the

169

plasma and spontaneous emission of the flame was reduced. The emission intensities of the

170

sodium 3P3S doublet at 588.995 and 589.592 nm were recorded.

171

2.6 LIBS CALIBRATION. A series of calibration experiments were carried out to allow 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 29

172

quantitative measurement of sodium release using LIBS. An ultrasonic vaporizer was used to

173

generate a fog of sodium chloride (NaCl) solution, which was carried by the feeding gas into the

174

pilot flame through the vapor chamber. This calibration method was described in detail in Ref. 27.

175

In this work, the average seeding rate of NaCl solution was 0.69 g/min, which was calculated

176

based on the mass loss from the seeding solution. In order to obtain various concentrations of Na

177

in the flame, different concentrations of the NaCl solution were used. The distribution of NaCl

178

vapor in the flame was assumed to be uniform. For the experimental setup used here a response

179

function was measured as: ,



= 2430 × %   = 0.96

(5)

180

where ILIBS,Na is the LIBS signal, CNa is the seeding concentration of Na in the calibration flame,

181

and 2430 is the calibration constant.

182

2.7 SURFACE TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT OF A COAL PELLET. The 18, 36

183

two-color pyrometry technique

was employed to detect the surface temperature of a coal

184

particle during combustion. The thermal emission from the burning pellet was collected with a

185

gated intensified CCD camera (Princeton Instruments PIMAX3-1024i). Simultaneously 2D

186

images of the coal particle were recorded using a bi-optic lens attachment (LAVISION VZ-image

187

doubler). Filters of 1-nm bandwidth centered at 633 nm and 647 nm placed in alternative paths of

188

the bi-optic provided the spectral discrimination needed for the two-color pyrometry technique.

189

Images were collected at 0.5 Hz with a gate width of 800 ms throughout the duration of the coal

190

pellet combustion. These combustion tests were repeated five times. Since the LIBS signal is

191

vastly stronger than the thermal emission, it was not possible to conduct LIBS and thermal 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

192

measurements simultaneously. The 2D images of thermal radiation of the coal pellet can be used

193

to calculate the surface temperature by using Wien's equation to compare the intensity of two

194

wavelengths: 1 1 − . , , * = ,4   3 /0 1- + /0 1- + /0 31- + /0 -4 , 1 1 1 % × +

(6)

195

where Tp is the surface temperature, C2 is the second Plack's constant, λ is the wavelength of

196

thermal radiation, E is the emissive power, ε is the emissivity of the pellet surface, and S is the

197

charge coupled device (CCD) spectral response. The value of S was taken from the camera

198

manufacturer’s calibration. As the wavelengths are very close to each other (633 nm and 647 nm),

199

the value of ελ1 /ελ2 was approximated to 1. Since the Biot number of the coal pellet is very small

200

(0.02), Tp is also a good approximation of the temperature of the whole coal pellet.

201

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

202

3.1 EFFECTS OF UPGRADING ON COAL COMPOSITIONS. The MI process excites

203

vibrational modes of water molecules in coal, thereby increasing internal energy of the molecules

204

and causing water to evaporate. As shown in Table 1, significant dehydration was achieved by the

205

MI process: the moisture concentration of the coal decreased from 16.06 wt.% to 8.64 wt.% after

206

1 minute with 500 W irradiation and to 6.95 wt.% after 5 minutes with the same irradiation power.

207

Higher irradiation power leads to a stronger dehydration effect, as can be seen from the

208

comparison between the MI results at 500W&1min and 800W&1min. Weight based parameters

209

showed improvement due to water loss: both the calorific value and the carbon concentration 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 29

210

increased. For combustible compounds (dry, ash-free basis), the volatile concentration (Vdaf)

211

decreased while the fixed carbon concentration increased (FCdaf). The loss of volatile compounds

212

indicates that they maybe outgassed during the MI process. The coal rank therefore moves

213

towards a higher rank. An additional effect of the MI process is that volatile compounds may be

214

converted from unstable to stable forms 31. The major conversion of volatile compounds may be

215

due to those compounds that contain oxygen groups, substantiated by the increase of the

216

oxygen/hydrogen ratio after MI. The ratio (IO/C) of atomic oxygen to carbon can reflect the

217

aromaticity in the coal and therefore is closely related to the rank of the coal. Since the value of

218

IO/C was calculated from the oxygen and carbon content in dry-ash-free basis. So the evaporating

219

of moisture will not affect this value. According to Ge et al. 31, a lower value of IO/C indicates a

220

higher rank of coal. After MI, the IO/C values decreased from 0.204 (Raw) to 0.193 (500W&1min)

221

and 0.17 (500W&5min), respectively. Also seen in Table 1 is that the sodium concentration

222

followed the same trend of change as the concentration of fixed-carbon compounds after MI.

223

Consequently, the coal sample with the lowest moisture concentration had the highest sodium

224

concentration, i.e. 0.357 wt.% (500W&5min), while a higher-moisture-concentration coal sample

225

contained a lower concentration of sodium, e.g. 0.355 wt.% (500W&1min) and 0.313wt.%

226

(Raw).

227

3.2 EFFECTS OF UPGRADING ON THERMAL GRAVITY PROPERTIES OF

228

COAL. Changes in combustion properties of coal after MI are shown in Fig. 2. When the coal

229

rank increases, the TGA curve moved toward a higher temperature due to a higher ignition

230

temperature and a lower concentration of volatile hydrocarbons. A longer MI time period or 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

231

higher MI power made the duration of the coal combustion become longer, as can be seen by

232

contrasting the 500W&1min curve with the 800W&1min and 500W&5min ones. Each TGA

233

curve showed two obvious dips. The first dip at the start of heating was caused by vaporization of

234

water in the coal samples. The second dip was caused by the release of volatile compounds just

235

prior to char combustion. Because of moisture removal from the MI processed coals, water

236

evaporation was shortened. At the location of the second dip, a higher ignition temperature was

237

evident.

238

To quantitatively describe the changes of combustion properties of different coal samples,

239

the results of the TGA and DTA curves are incorporated into the comprehensive combustion

240

parameter S, as shown in Table 2. Comparing the effect of the upgrading time as shown in Figs. 2

241

and 3, a longer MI period would make the TGA curve move towards a higher temperature region,

242

and the coal burning rate would be lower. This was quantified in Table 2: for example, the Ti

243

value increased from 506.3 K (Raw) to 534.7 K (500W&1min) and 546.9K (500W&5min),

244

respectively. The increase in Ti has been attributed to the decrease of volatile concentrations,

245

reduction of oxygen functional groups and changes in the coal’s pore structure 37, 38. Tb followed

246

the same trend as Ti, increasing from 771.7 K (Raw) to 801 K (500W&1min) and 848.8 K

247

(500W&5min), respectively. The average mass-loss rate kmean decreased from -0.3185 (Raw) to

248

-0.3033 (500W&1min) and -0.298 (500W&5min), respectively.

249

For the same MI duration, comparing the Raw case to the 500W&1min and 800W&1min,

250

change of irradiation power impacts significantly on thermal gravity properties of the coal,

251

similarly to the role played by the MI duration. For example, Tmax became higher when the 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 29

252

irradiation power increased, changing from 654.9 K (Raw) to 658.9 K (500W&1min) and 668.9

253

K (800W&1min), respectively. The S index changed in an opposite trend to that of Tmax, from

254

2.561×10-9 (Raw) to 1.859×10-9 (500W&1min) and 1.452×10-9 (800W&1min), respectively.

255

For high-rank coal, Ti and Tb are usually higher than for low-rank coal, so MI makes the 31, 39

256

upgraded coal samples perform similar to high-rank coals in this respect

. However, all the

257

other parameters (Tmax, kmax, kmean and S) decreased after MI, a trend that strengthens with the MI

258

duration or power. Since the coal samples with a lower S index exhibit worse combustion

259

performance, the decreasing parameters suggest that MI changed the char and pore structures,

260

making the coal burn more slowly. This phenomenon also indicates the coal rank has been

261

upgraded.

262

3.3 EFFECTS OF UPGRADING ON THE SURFACE TEMPERATURE DURING

263

COAL COMBUSTION. The surface temperature versus time for the raw coal and upgraded

264

coal pellets is shown in Fig. 4. The surface temperature profiles can be analyzed according to the

265

three respective stages of coal combustion. The first temperature peak occurs during the pyrolysis

266

and volatile gas combustion stage shown in Fig. 1(a). In this stage, the coal pellet undergoes

267

pyrolysis and the volatile compounds burning around the coal pellet quickly heat the pellet. After

268

the volatile hydrocarbons are consumed, the char begins to burn and the heat exchange with the

269

surrounding gas contributes more directly to increasing the coal pellet temperature than burning

270

of gaseous volatile species. Through the second temperature peak, the char burns steadily and the

271

surface temperature reaches its maximum value (Fig. 1(b)). The majority of the chemical energy

272

of the coal is released before the pellet reaches the maximum temperature. After the char has been 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

273

consumed, the chemical energy is exhausted so the pellet cools to the temperature at which

274

thermal equilibrium with the surrounding post-combustion gases is established (Fig. 1(c)).

275

The effect of MI on the surface temperature of the coal pellet is apparent. In the volatile

276

combustion stage, the time at which the peak surface temperature was reached is similar for all

277

coal samples, but the peak temperature was lower for upgraded coals. The duration of char

278

burnout increased from 313 s (Raw) to 357 s (500 W&1min) and 383 s (500W&5min),

279

respectively. The peak surface temperature decreased from 1596 K (Raw) to 1517 K (500

280

W&1min) and 1487 K (500W&5min), respectively. That is because MI reduces the amount of

281

volatile compounds through either outgassing or conversion to more stable carbon compounds,

282

resulting in the lower peak temperatures of the upgraded coal samples during the volatile

283

combustion stage. In the char combustion stage, the surface temperatures were lower and the

284

peak widths at half maximum were bigger for upgraded samples as compared to the raw sample.

285

In tandem with the wider peaks, the second peak temperature showed an increasing delay with

286

increasing MI power. As in section 3.2, the combustion of char of upgraded coal samples

287

occurred more slowly. As the heat transfer conditions were equivalent for the various coal

288

samples, the worse performance of combustion of the upgraded coal samples can be seen from

289

the delay in the onset of the char combustion stage and the slower burning speed characterized by

290

a lower peak temperature but a longer combustion duration.

291

3.4 EFFECTS OF UPGRADING ON SODIUM COMPOUND CLASSES IN COAL.

292

The mass fractions of the four sodium-compound classes in the raw and upgraded coal samples

293

are shown in Fig. 5 according to different durations and power of microwave irradiation. The 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 29

294

amount of water-soluble Na was found to increase after MI; while the amount of NH4Ac-soluble

295

sodium decreased in the upgraded coal samples. The respective gain and loss of these two classes

296

increased with increasing MI durations. According to our previous Fourier transform infrared

297

spectroscopy (FTIR) results

298

methyl/methylene and aromatic/aliphatic ratios will be higher after MI treatment. All these

299

phenomena indicated the destruction of unstable components in the brown coal or the conversion

300

of unstable components to stable components, such as: MI treatment can dissociates and shifts

301

the oxygen-containing functional groups. As NH4Ac-soluble sodium can be organically

302

connected with carboxyl groups, the destruction of these functional groups would reduce the

303

amount of sodium in this class. Since the decrease of the mass of NH4Ac-soluble sodium is

304

similar to the increase of the mass of water-soluble sodium, it is reasonable to speculate that MI

305

has shifted some of the NH4Ac-soluble sodium to water-soluble sodium. The mass of

306

HCl-soluble or insoluble sodium did not show an obvious change after microwave upgrading. As

307

these sodium compounds are present in stable nitrogen- or oxygen-containing functional groups

308

or silicate minerals, these sodium classes are largely unaffected by microwave irradiation. Using

309

different irradiation power levels yielded a similar trend to using different MI durations; a greater

310

amount of input microwave energy enhances the conversion of NH4Ac-soluble Na to

311

water-soluble Na. Again, there is no recognizable change in the stable insoluble and HCl-soluble

312

sodium classes.

31

, the carbonyl/aromatic ratio will be lower but the values of

313

3.5 EFFECTS OF UPGRADING ON SODIUM RELEASE DURING COAL

314

COMBUSTION. The profiles of sodium release during combustion of the raw coal and 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

315

upgraded coal samples are given in Fig. 6. Similar to the surface temperature curves, the sodium

316

release profiles also have two peaks. The first combustion stage, i.e., de-volatilization, is the

317

shortest, characterized by a modest peak shortly after ignition. In this stage, water in the coal

318

pores is heated and begins to vaporize, ejecting water-soluble sodium with the steam. High

319

vapor-pressure compounds are also released with some organic sodium

320

combustion stage features the global maximum of the sodium release profiles

321

char burns, causing the temperature of the pellet to reach the highest. Most organic sodium will

322

be released during this stage. Some inorganic sodium may also be decomposed and released due

323

to high temperatures. The third stage begins shortly after the peak signal, and is indicated by a

324

steep decline in the signal. At this stage, the majority of organic matter has been burnt away and

325

only ash remains. But, as the pellet remains in a high temperature plume, inorganic sodium can

326

still be released due to reaction with water in the flame 21.

12, 33

. The second

18, 27

. In this stage,

327

As seen in Fig. 6, MI was found to have a significant impact on sodium release during coal

328

combustion. Specific information from the profiles is shown in Table 3. In the table, tpeak,v and

329

tpeak,c are the time instants at which the peak concentrations are found during the first and second

330

stages, respectively; tb,A and te,A indicate the beginning and ending time of the ash stage,

331

respectively; IV and IC are the peak values of the Na release curve in the first and second stages,

332

respectively, and IA is the mean value of the third stage.

333

It is known that the peak values of the sodium concentration are closely related to the 27, 33

334

burning temperature and burning rate of the coal sample

. For the first stage, although the

335

upgraded samples burned at consistently lower temperatures, the peak sodium concentrations 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 29

336

were almost unchanged. It is likely that changes in the structure of the coal pellet and conversion

337

of sodium among different classes, as discussed in section 3.3, enhance the sodium release during

338

this stage. During the char burning stage, the sodium release was delayed in the upgraded

339

samples. The appearance of the peak sodium concentrations during the second combustion stage

340

(tpeak,c) was delayed from 252 s (Raw) to 314 s (500W&1min) and 382 s (500W&5min),

341

respectively. For different MI powers, tb,A increased from 424 s (Raw) to 641 s (500W&1min)

342

and 656 s (800W&1min), respectively. Additionally, the peak concentration of sodium was

343

reduced after MI, which is similar to the trends for the surface temperature. The lower pellet

344

temperature during the char combustion stage of the upgraded coal sample decreased the sodium

345

release rate, resulting in the observed decrease of sodium concentrations.

346

In the ash stage, it is apparent that the factors influencing sodium release have changed.

347

Although the measured temperatures of each sample were similar, the sodium release of upgraded

348

coal samples was enhanced in comparison with that of the raw coal. This can be attributed to

349

changes in the ash structure caused by MI. For example, an increase in the porosity will cause

350

more active interactions of the mineral matter with H2O in the plume.

351

4 CONCLUSIONS

352

Microwave irradiation is an effective method for upgrading low-rank coals, which can

353

remove moisture of raw coal samples by more than 50% after a few minutes of irradiation. The

354

carbon content and calorific value are increased as a result of the water removal. But the volatile

355

compounds (dry; ash-free) and the IO/C parameter decrease after MI. Overall, the ultimate analysis 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

356

Energy & Fuels

of upgraded low-rank coals show increased similarity to high-rank coal.

357

The TGA results indicate that after MI, the propensity for combustion decreases. The coal

358

ignition and burnout occur at higher temperatures, and the comprehensive combustion

359

characteristic index is reduced. These changes, caused by the MI process, will make upgraded

360

coal samples more difficult to ignite, sustain burning and burnout than the raw samples.

361

Increasing either the duration or irradiation power of MI will increase the extent of conversion.

362

MI transforms sodium among different classes as measured by sequential extraction. After

363

microwave upgrading, the amount of water-soluble sodium in the coal sample was found to

364

increase, while the amount of NH4Ac-soluble sodium decreased. The HCl-soluble sodium and the

365

insoluble sodium did not show an appreciable change.

366

The surface temperature of the burning coal pellet featured two peaks, occurring in the

367

volatile burning stage and the char burning stage. The surface-temperature peak of the upgraded

368

coal sample occurred at different times from that of the raw coal sample, and the upgraded coal

369

samples showed consistently lower temperatures while the pellet was actively burning. The lower

370

temperatures during the volatile burning stage are due to the loss or conversion of volatile

371

compounds. MI also leads to a slower burning of char, as indicated by a delayed peak

372

temperature and lower overall heat release.

373

The changes in coal compositions, combustion characteristics and sodium classes after MI

374

greatly influence the sodium release during combustion. For the de-volatilization stage, the

375

decrease of the pellet temperature is offset by the increase of less stable sodium species, resulting

376

in little changes in sodium release. However, the pellet temperature greatly influenced sodium 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 29

377

release during the char burning stage, i.e. the sodium concentration decreased for upgraded coal

378

samples. In the ash stage, more sodium was released in upgraded coal samples, likely due to

379

more active interactions of sodium mineral with H2O in the plume, which is facilitated by a more

380

porous ash structure.

381

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

382

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Contact No.

383

51406178), National Basic Research Program of China (Contract No. 2012CB214906),

384

Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Contract No.

385

20130101110095) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Contract No. 2014M551732).

386

387

REFERENCE

388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403

(1) Rao, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, C.; Duan, C.; He, J. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2015, 46, 1-11. (2) Bosoaga, A.; Panoiu, N.; Mihaescu, L.; Backreedy, R.; Ma, L.; Pourkashanian, M.; Williams, A. Fuel 2006, 85 (10), 1591-1598. (3) Fernandez-Turiel, J.-L.; Georgakopoulos, A.; Gimeno, D.; Papastergios, G.; Kolovos, N. Energy Fuels 2004, 18 (5), 1512-1518. (4) Tahmasebi, A.; Yu, J.; Li, X.; Meesri, C. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92 (10), 1821-1829. (5) Li, D.-L.; Liang, D.-Q.; Fan, S.-S.; Li, X.-S.; Tang, L.-G.; Huang, N.-S. Energy Conv. Manag. 2008, 49 (8), 2207-2213. (6) Lester, E.; Kingman, S. Fuel 2004, 83 (14), 1941-1947. (7) Haque, K. E. Int. J. Miner. Process. 1999, 57 (1), 1-24. (8) Lester, E.; Kingman, S. Energy Fuels 2004, 18 (1), 140-147. (9) Sönmez, Ö.; Giray, E. S. Fuel 2011, 90 (6), 2125-2131. (10) Mesroghli, S.; Yperman, J.; Jorjani, E.; Carleer, R.; Noaparast, M. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 131, 193-202. (11) Sahoo, B.; De, S.; Meikap, B. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92 (10), 1920-1928. (12) Benson, S. A.; Holm, P. L. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1985, 24 (1), 145-149. (13) Sandberg, J.; Karlsson, C.; Fdhila, R. B. Appl. Energy 2011, 88 (1), 99-110.

20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435

Energy & Fuels

(14) Bryers, R. W. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1996, 22 (1), 29-120. (15) Neville, M.; Sarofim, A. Fuel 1985, 64 (3), 384-390. (16) Miller, S. F.; Schobert, H. H. Energy Fuels 1994, 8 (6), 1197-1207. (17) Toftegaard, M. B.; Brix, J.; Jensen, P. A.; Glarborg, P.; Jensen, A. D. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36 (5), 581-625. (18) Van Eyk, P.; Ashman, P.; Alwahabi, Z.; Nathan, G. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2009, 32 (2), 2099-2106. (19) Kim, S. S.; Kang, Y. S.; Lee, H. D.; Kim, J. K.; Hong, S. C. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012, 18 (6), 2199-2203. (20) Yuan, Y.; Li, S.; Yao, Q. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2015, 35 (2), 2339-2346. (21) Van Eyk, P. J.; Ashman, P. J.; Alwahabi, Z. T.; Nathan, G. J. Combust. Flame 2011, 158 (6), 1181-1192. (22) Van Eyk, P. J.; Ashman, P. J.; Nathan, G. J. Combust. Flame 2011, 158 (12), 2512-2523. (23) Glarborg, P.; Marshall, P. Combust. Flame 2005, 141 (1), 22-39. (24) Singh, J. P.; Almirall, J. R.; Sabsabi, M.; Miziolek, A. W. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 400 (10), 3191-3192. (25) Musazzi, S.; Golinelli, E.; Perini, U.; Barberis, F.; Zanetta, G. Elemental analysis of coal by means of the Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) technique, Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), 2012 IEEE, 2012; IEEE: 2012; pp 1-3. (26) Gaft, M.; Dvir, E.; Modiano, H.; Schone, U. Spectroc. Acta Pt. B-Atom. Spectr. 2008, 63 (10), 1177-1182. (27) He, Y.; Zhu, J.; Li, B.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Aldén, M.; Cen, K. Energy Fuels 2013, 27 (2), 1123-1130. (28) Zhou, J.; Zhuang, X.; Alastuey, A.; Querol, X.; Li, J. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2010, 82 (1), 51-67. (29) Vyazovkin, S.; Burnham, A. K.; Criado, J. M.; Pérez-Maqueda, L. A.; Popescu, C.; Sbirrazzuoli, N. Thermochim. Acta 2011, 520 (1), 1-19. (30) Boxiong, S.; Dechang, L.; Jidong, L. China Pet. Process. Petrochem. T. 2000, 31 (10), 60-64. (31) Ge, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Cen, K. Energy Conv. Manag. 2013, 71, 84-91. (32) Li, Q.; Zhao, C.; Chen, X.; Wu, W.; Li, Y. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2009, 85 (1), 521-528. (33) Zhang, J.; Han, C.-L.; Yan, Z.; Liu, K.; Xu, Y.; Sheng, C.-D.; Pan, W.-P. Energy Fuels 2001, 15 (4), 786-793. (34) Zevenhoven-Onderwater, M.; Blomquist, J.-P.; Skrifvars, B.-J.; Backman, R.; Hupa, M. Fuel 2000, 79 (11), 1353-1361. (35) He, Y.; Wang, Z.; Weng, W.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Cen, K. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39 (17), 9534-9544. (36) Huang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Riley, G. Measurement 2000, 28 (3), 175-183. (37) Cheng, J.; Zhou, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Cen, K. Energy Fuels 2008, 22 (4), 2422-2428. (38) ZHOU, J.-h.; LI, Y.-c.; CHENG, J.; LI, S.-s.; ZHAO, X.-h.; LIU, J.-z.; CEN, K.-f. J. China Coal Soc. 2007, 6, 014. (39) Haykiri-Açma, H.; Ersoy-Meriçboyu, A.; Küçükbayrak, S. Energy Conv. Manag. 2002, 43 (4), 459-465.

436 437

21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 22 of 29

438 Table 1. MI effects on coal properties.

439

Proximate analysis (wt.%) Sample

Calorific value (J/g) Mr

Ar

Vr

FCr

Vdaf

FCdaf

Raw

16.06

3.55

26.64

53.75

33.14

66.86

22802

500W&1min.

8.64

4.04

28.38

58.94

32.50

67.50

24898

800W&1min.

7.14

4.13

28.61

60.12

32.24

67.76

25406

500W&5min.

6.95

4.17

28.56

60.32

32.13

67.87

25448

Ultimate analysis (wt.%, dry, ash-free basis)

Sodium Io/c

Carbon

Hydrogen

Nitrogen

Sulfur

Oxygen

(wt.%,received basis)

Raw

78.45

4.15

0.87

0.54

15.99

0.313

0.204

500W&1min.

79.5

3.76

0.83

0.54

15.37

0.347

0.193

800W&1min.

79.91

4.86

1.03

0.58

13.62

0.355

0.170

500W&5min.

80.01

4.87

0.89

0.59

13.64

0.357

0.170

440 441 442 443 Table 2. MI effects on characteristic combustion parameters.

444

Ti

Tb

Tmax

kmax

kmean

Sample

S (K)

(K)

(K)

(%/K)

22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

(%/K)

Page 23 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

Raw

506.3

771.7

654.9

-1.59

-0.3185

2.561·10-09

500W&1min.

534.7

801

658.9

-1.38

-0.3084

1.859·10-09

800W&1min.

536.1

836

668.6

-1.15

-0.3033

1.452·10-09

500W&5min.

546.9

848.8

675.1

-0.88

-0.2980

1.045·10-09

445 446 447 448 449 Table 3. MI effects on sodium release.

450 Sample

tpeak,v (s)

tpeak,c (s)

tb,A (s)

te,A (s)

IV (mg/m3)

IC (mg/m3)

IA (mg/m3)

Raw

10

252

424

3192

1.411

3.539

0.346

500W&1min.

13

314

641

3930

1.404

3.377

0.382

800W&1min.

15

346

656

4000

1.401

3.368

0.426

500W&5min.

17

382

674

4000

1.394

3.365

0.422

451 452 453

23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

454 455

Figure 1.Experimental setup of LIBS measurement

456 457

24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 24 of 29

Page 25 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

458 459

Figure 2.TGA curves of the raw and upgraded coals.

460

25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

461

462 463

Figure 3. DTA curves of the raw and upgraded coals.

464

26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 26 of 29

Page 27 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

465

466 467

Figure 4. Surface temperature of the raw and upgraded coals.

468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478

27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

479

Page 28 of 29

(a) water-soluble sodium

(b) NH4Ac-soluble sodium

(c) HCl-soluble sodium

(d) insoluble sodium

Figure 5. MI effects on sodium classes.

480

28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 29 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

481 482

Figure 6. Sodium release during the burning of the raw and upgraded coals.

483 484 485

29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment