Effects of whole-grain rice and wheat on ... - ACS Publications

Sequence analysis was performed by QIIME software package version 1.8.0. 172 .... the highest in the WW group, accounting for about 82% of the total b...
7 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by - Access paid by the | UCSB Libraries

Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions

Effects of whole-grain rice and wheat on composition of gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in rats Fei Han, Yong Wang, Yangyang Han, Jianxin Zhao, Fenli Han, Ge Song, Ping Jiang, and Haijiang Miao J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01891 • Publication Date (Web): 16 May 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 16, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Effects of whole-grain rice and wheat on composition of gut

2

microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in rats

3 4

Fei Han†,§,*, Yong Wang†,§, Yangyang Han†,‡, Jianxin Zhao‡, Fenli Han†,‡, Ge Song†,

5

Ping Jiang†, and Haijiang Miao†

6 7



8

China

9



10

Academy of State Administration of Grain, Beijing 100037, People’s Republic of

School of Food Science & Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122,

People’s Republic of China

11 12

§

13

* Corresponding author.

14

E-mail address: [email protected] (F. Han).

F. Han and Y. Wang contributed equally to this work.

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

26

ABSTRACT: Diets rich in whole grain (WG) cereals bring lower disease risks

27

compared with refined grain-based diets. We investigated the effects of polished rice

28

(PR), refined wheat (RW), unpolished rice (UPR), and whole wheat (WW) on

29

short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and gut microbiota in ileal, cecal, and colonic digesta

30

of normal rats. Animals fed with UPR and WW diets exhibited higher total SCFA in

31

cecal and colonic digesta compared with those fed with PR and RW diets. Wheat diets

32

contributed higher total SCFA than rice diets. In cecal and colonic digesta, animals

33

fed with UPR and WW diets demonstrated higher acetate and butyrate contents than

34

those given PR and RW. Firmicutes were the dominant eumycota in rat ileum digesta

35

(>92% abundance). Cecal and colonic digesta were dominated by Firmicutes,

36

Verrucomicrobia, and Bacteroidetes. UPR and WW affected gut microbiota,

37

decreasing the proportion of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes. SMB53, Lactobacillus, and

38

Faecalibacterium were the main bacterial genera in ileal digesta. Akkermansia was

39

highest in cecal and colonic digesta. In the colonic digesta of rats, the relative

40

abundance of Akkermansia in rats on wheat diets was higher than that in rats on rice

41

diets (P1%

583

are listed in the pie chart, whereas rare taxa are pooled and shown as “other.”

584 585

Figure 3. Venn diagram displays number of unique and shared OTUs among five

586

groups in ileal (A), cecal (B), and colonic (C) digesta (n = 5 per group) of rats after 6

587

weeks. BG: basal diet-fed group, PR: polished rice group, UPR: unpolished rice group,

588

RW: refined wheat group, WW: whole wheat group.

589 590 591 592 593 594 25

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

595

Page 26 of 39

Table 1 Formula, nutritional components, and energy of different diets. Diet (g/100 g of dried feed) Basic diet Casein Corn flour Polished rice flour Unpolished rice flour Refined wheat flour Whole wheat flour Dextrin Soybean oil Cellulose Minerals Vitamins L-cysteine Choline chloride TBHQ Nutritional component (%) Dry matter Crude protein Crude fat Crude ash Crude fiber Resistant starch Non-starch polysaccharide Arabinoxylan MJ/kg feed Energy density

596

Polished rice diet

Unpolished rice diet

Refined wheat diet

Whole wheat diet

14 56.6 0 0 0 0 15.5 4 5 3.5 1 0.18 0.25 0.0008

14 6.6 50 0 0 0 15.5 4 5 3.5 1 0.18 0.25 0.0008

14 6.6 0 50 0 0 15.5 4 5 3.5 1 0.18 0.25 0.0008

14 6.6 0 0 50 0 15.5 4 5 3.5 1 0.18 0.25 0.0008

14 6.6 0 0 0 50 15.5 4 5 3.5 1 0.18 0.25 0.0008

87.56±0.03e 10.25±0.05d 3.63±0.05c 2.22±0.01d 3.55±0.02d 2.32±0.07c 8.83±0.05a

93.17±0.05a 13.70±0.08c 3.70±0.01c 2.45±0.01c 3.74±0.03c 5.52±0.28a 7.18±0.18b

90.23±0.08d 13.73±0.05c 3.90±0.03b 2.68±0.01b 3.89±0.01b 2.35±0.35c 8.82±0.52a

91.57±0.03c 16.25±0.01b 3.73±0.06bc 2.47±0.10c 3.42±0.01d 3.34±0.11bc 7.61±0.40b

92.24±0.03b 17.30±0.01a 4.10±0.07a 2.96±0.02a 4.27±0.01a 3.57±0.11b 7.35±0.42b

0.06±0.01d

0.07±0.00d

0.15±0.01c

0.36±0.02b

0.80±0.02a

16.41

17.43

17.21

17.29

17.26

Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).

597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 26

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

608

Table 2 Effects of experimental diets on body weight gain, feed intake, and food efficiency ratio of

609

rats after 6 weeks

Basal diet-fed group Polished rice group Unpolished rice group Refined wheat group Whole wheat group

Initial body weight (g) 298.50±7.82

Final body weight (g) 477.80±12.46

Body weight gain (g) 185.98±4.88d

Food intake (g) 821.64±28.45d

Food efficiency ratio 0.23

303.69±9.56

526.32±29.48

223.20±16.13a

907.96±19.72a

0.25

300.02±9.07

484.84±9.33

191.36±5.75c

874.90±20.37ab

0.22

298.70±10.26

504.56±22.93

210.68±16.24b

850.08±6.52c

0.25

302.21±4.35

494.85±12.94

193.49±7.78c

862.20±34.31bc

0.22

610

Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 10). Differences among groups were evaluated for

611

significance by Tukey’s post hoc test. Values in the same column that do not share the same

612

lowercase letter are significantly different (P