Electrolyte Optimization for Enhancing Electrochemical Performance

Jul 26, 2017 - (1, 2) Sodium-ion batteries (NIBs) are potential alternatives to LIBs for large-scale energy storage applications due to the low cost a...
2 downloads 7 Views 5MB Size
Research Article pubs.acs.org/journal/ascecg

Electrolyte Optimization for Enhancing Electrochemical Performance of Antimony Sulfide/Graphene Anodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries− Carbonate-Based and Ionic Liquid Electrolytes Cheng-Yang Li,†,∇ Jagabandhu Patra,†,∇ Cheng-Hsien Yang,†,∇ Chuan-Ming Tseng,*,‡ Subhasish B. Majumder,§ Quan-Feng Dong,∥ and Jeng-Kuei Chang*,† †

Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, National Central University, 300 Jhong-Da Road, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan Department of Materials Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, 84 Gungjuan Road, Taishan District, New Taipei City 24301, Taiwan § Materials Science Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India ∥ State Key Laboratory for Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, Xiamen University, 422, South Siming Raod, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China ‡

S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: The electrolyte is a key component in determining the performance of sodium-ion batteries. A systematic study is conducted to optimize the electrolyte formulation for a Sb2S3/graphene anode, which is synthesized via a facile solvothermal method. The effects of solvent composition and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) additive on the electrochemical properties of the anode are examined. The propylene carbonate (PC)-based electrolyte with FEC can ensure the formation of a reliable solid-electrolyte interphase layer, resulting in superior charge−discharge performance, compared to that found in the ethylene carbonate (EC)/diethyl carbonate (DEC)-based electrolyte. At 60 °C, the carbonatebased electrolyte cannot function properly. At such an elevated temperature, however, the use of an N-propyl-Nmethylpyrrolidinium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide ionic liquid electrolyte is highly promising, enabling the Sb2S3/graphene electrode to deliver a high reversible capacity of 760 mAh g−1 and retain 95% of its initial performance after 100 cycles. The present work demonstrates that the electrode sodiation/desodiation properties are dependent significantly on the electrolyte formulation, which should be optimized for various application demands and operating temperatures of batteries. KEYWORDS: Sodium-ion batteries, Electrolyte, Antimony sulfide, Ionic liquid, Additive



INTRODUCTION The growing demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has caused concern about rising prices and the long-term availability of global lithium reserves.1,2 Sodium-ion batteries (NIBs) are potential alternatives to LIBs for large-scale energy storage applications due to the low cost and abundant availability of sodium precursors.3 The search for suitable anodes and cathodes with high capacity, good rate capability, and long lifespan for NIBs is currently the focus of much research.4−9 Graphite anodes, typically used for LIBs, are thermodynamically unfavorable for Na+ storage.10,11 The other carbonaceous anodes for NIBs, such as hard carbon, extended graphite, porous carbon, and graphene materials, generally possess specific capacities of only ∼300 mAh g−1.12−15 Therefore, antimony trisulfide (Sb2S3) has recently received much attention, because of its high reversibility,16,17 good reaction kinetics,18,19 and large theoretical capacity of 946 mAh g−1, based on both the conversion reaction (Sb2S3 + 6Na+ + 6e− → 2Sb + 3Na2S) and alloying reaction (2Sb + 6Na+ + 6e− → 2Na3Sb).16,20 Despite this potential, there are still many © 2017 American Chemical Society

challenges that must be addressed before this anode can be used in practical applications (e.g., Coulombic efficiency, cyclic stability, and elevated-temperature reliability). Several strategies have been utilized to improve the electrochemical properties of Sb2S3 anodes. Specifically, nanosizing the active material,19 performing surface coating,18,21 and introducing conducting nanocarbons17,22,23 have been used to promote material utilization, suppress polysulfide dissolution, increase electrode conductivity, and mitigate the strain generated during charging−discharging. Nevertheless, the electrode/electrolyte interface quality, which is strongly dependent on the electrolyte composition, is another crucial factor that governs the ultimate electrochemical sodiation/ desodiation performance. Unfortunately, to date, there have been no studies on electrolyte optimization for Sb2S3 anodes, and, thus, more work in this area is needed. Received: June 14, 2017 Revised: July 25, 2017 Published: July 26, 2017 8269

DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01939 ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 8269−8276

Research Article

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

importance of the electrolyte formulation, which affects the charge−discharge performance of the electrode to a great extent.

The effects of electrolyte composition on NIB performance have been investigated mainly for hard carbon (HC) anodes. Komaba et al. studied HC//Na cells with various electrolyte solvents comprising 1 M NaClO4.13 The propylene carbonate (PC) and ethylene carbonate (EC)/diethyl carbonate (DEC) solvents clearly outperformed EC/ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), EC/dimethyl carbonate (DMC), and PC/vinylene carbonate (VC) solvents, in terms of cell stability. A comparative study was carried out by Ponrouch et al. on diverse electrolyte formulations with various salts (NaClO4, NaPF6, and NaTFSI) and solvents (PC, EC, DMC, DEC, dimethyl ether (DME), triglyme, and tetrahydrofuran) or their mixtures (EC/DMC, EC/DME, EC/PC, and EC/triglyme).24 They concluded that good Coulombic efficiencies were recorded in the cases of PC-, EC/PC-, and EC/DEC-based electrolytes, whereas EC/DMC- and EC/DME-based electrolytes showed poor performance. The other key component in an electrolyte is the additive. Adding fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), which is a solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) enhancer, to PC-based electrolytes has been found to effectively improve the cyclic stability of an HC electrode, whereas other additives, such as transdifluoroetyhene carbonate (DFEC), ethylene sulfite (ES), and VC, did not show any positive influences.25,26 However, the effects of FEC additive have been disputed, with research indicating that it resulted in the formation of a lessconducting SEI, compared to that produced in a FEC-free PC/ EC electrolyte.27 FEC also decreased HC capacity and Coulombic efficiency, suggesting that this additive is unnecessary.27 It should be noted that the optimal electrolyte formulation can be electrode-material-dependent. Nevertheless, data on the effects of the electrolyte on NIB electrodes other than HC are rather limited. PC- and EC/DEC-based electrolytes with and without FEC have been arbitrarily chosen in the literature to study the electrochemical performance of Sb2S3 anodes, while their influences are unknown. Therefore, a systematic comparison between various electrolyte recipes for Sb2S3 is conducted in this study. Besides conventional carbonate-based electrolytes, ionic liquid (IL) electrolytes, characterized by intrinsic conductivity, large electrochemical windows, excellent thermal stability, and designable physicochemical properties,28,29 have great potential for application in NIBs.30 The nonflammability and negligible volatility of ILs give them high safety and a low environmental impact, which are especially important for large-size NIBs. NaTFSI/CsTFSI and NaFSI/KFSI (TFSI = bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide; FSI = bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide) intermediate-temperature IL electrolytes (whose melting points are above room temperature) were first proposed by Nohira and Hagiwara et al. for NIBs.31,32 Room-temperature ILs based on imidazolium and pyrrolidinium cations were later developed33−37 and used for HC,38 TiO2,39 Na2Ti3O7,40 and phosphorus41 anodes. The compatibility of ILs with a Sb2S3 anode, which has never been explored, is addressed in this work. Herein, we conduct a detailed investigation on PC and EC/ DEC electrolytes (containing NaClO4 salt) with and without FEC to clarify their effects on the Coulombic efficiency, reversible capacity, rate capability, and cycle life of a Sb2S3/ graphene anode prepared using a facile one-pot solvothermal method. The above properties are also compared to those of an N-propyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium (PMP)−FSI IL electrolyte. The temperature effects (25 and 60 °C) for both the carbonatebased and IL electrolytes are examined. The results point to the



EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Synthesis of Sb2S3/Graphene Composite. Graphene nanosheets were prepared using a modified Staudenmaier method.42 Detailed procedures can be found in earlier papers.43,44 The fabrication of the Sb2S3/graphene composite was conducted using a solvothermal method. Briefly, 0.015 mol of L-cysteine and 0.005 mol of SbCl3 were dissolved in 35 mL of ethylene glycol, which contained 25 wt % glucose and 5 wt % graphene. This solution was then transferred to a 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 180 °C for 8 h. The glucose was used to create a carbon coating. The Sb2S3/ graphene with a carbon coating layer has been reported to possess superior electrochemical performance21 and, thus, is used in this study. The resulting powder was repeatedly washed with anhydrous ethanol and collected via centrifugation. All the chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification. Electrolyte Preparation and Cell Assembly. PC and EC/DEC (1:1 by volume) solvents with and without FEC (5% by volume) were prepared with 1 M NaClO4 salt. Note that the use of NaFSI salt in carbonate electrolytes easily causes Al current collector corrosion problems at the cathode sides.45 The NaClO4 is the most commonly used salt for carbonate electrolytes in the literature. Accordingly, NaClO4 is adopted in this study. PMP−FSI IL was prepared and purified by following a published procedure.46 The IL was washed with dichloromethane, filtered to remove precipitates, and then vacuumdried at 100 °C for 12 h before use. 1 M NaFSI (99.7%, Solvionic) was dissolved into the IL to provide Na+ conduction. The mixture was continuously stirred by a magnetic paddle for 24 h to ensure uniformity. The water content of all electrolytes, measured using a Karl Fisher titrator, was 99.5%. This reflects the excellent compatibility between the Sb2S/graphene electrode and the PMP−FSI IL electrolyte, leading to the exceptional reversibility and cyclic stability. Figure 3 compares the morphologies of the electrodes after being cycled in the PC/ FEC and IL electrolytes. With the former electrolyte, the electrode active material became agglomerated and a relatively thick surface SEI film formed, resulting in a reduction of accessible reaction sites. In contrast, the electrode cycled in the IL electrolyte showed a minor morphology change with thinner SEI coverage. The high integrity of the electrode ensured that its electrochemical properties were highly preserved. Figure 4a shows the TGA data of the PC/FEC and PMP− FSI IL electrolytes. The carbonate electrolyte began to show a weight loss below 100 °C, at which point the organic solvent was highly volatile. In contrast, the IL electrolyte exhibited a decomposition temperature as high as ∼400 °C. Although the TGA analysis is a dynamic test that could overestimate the thermal stability limit of the electrolytes, these results clearly reveal that the IL electrolyte is promising for elevated-

Figure 3. SEM micrographs of (a) as-prepared Sb2S3/graphene electrode and the electrodes after first charge−discharge cycle performed in (b) PC/FEC and (c) PMP−FSI IL electrolytes at 25 °C.

Figure 4. (a) TGA data of PC/FEC and PMP−FSI IL electrolytes. Flammability tests of (b) PC/FEC electrolyte and (c) PMP−FSI IL electrolyte.

temperature applications. The flammability of the two electrolytes is compared in Figure 4b. Glass fiber papers were used to absorb the electrolytes and then tested with an electric Bunsen burner under air. While the carbonate electrolyte violently burned, the IL electrolyte was not ignited, indicating the higher safety of the latter electrolyte. The electrochemical properties of the Sb2S3/graphene electrodes were further examined in the PC/FEC and IL electrolytes at 60 °C. The resulting charge−discharge curves at various rates are shown in Figures 5a and 5b. Figure 6 summarizes the temperature effects for the two electrolytes. As shown in Figure 6a, the maximum capacity of the electrode measured in the PC/FEC electrolyte decreased as the temperature rose, whereas that for the IL electrolyte increased 8273

DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01939 ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 8269−8276

Research Article

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Figure 5. Charge−discharge curves of Sb2S3/graphene electrodes recorded in (a) PC/FEC and (b) PMP−FSI IL electrolytes at 60 °C. (c) EIS spectra and (d) cyclic stability of Sb2S3/graphene electrodes measured in the aforementioned two electrolytes at 60 °C.

relatively low Coulombic efficiency found for the PC/FEC electrolyte (Figure 5d), which can lead to growth of the SEI. Figure 5d also shows that the organic−electrolyte and IL− electrolyte cells retained 43% and 95% of their initial capacities, respectively, after 100 charge−discharge cycles at 60 °C. The durability of the former cell clearly decayed, compared to that at 25 °C (see Figure 6c), because of the low thermal stability of the electrolyte and the SEI generated.57,58 In contrast, the nonvolatility and chemical benignity of the IL electrolyte contributed to the good cell stability at 60 °C. Of note, the IL is nonflammable and highly safe (see Figure 4). Clearly, at such an elevated operation temperature, the IL is a promising electrolyte for the Sb2S3/graphene electrode. Unsatisfactory cyclic stability has long been a critical concern for alloy/ conversion-type electrodes. This study confirms that the use of an IL electrolyte can effectively mitigate this problem for a Sb2S3 anode, even for applications at 60 °C. Although the IL electrolyte is relatively expensive at the current stage, large-scale production will reduce the cost. In addition, development of cost-effective anions and cations for ILs is already underway.

Figure 6. Effects of temperature on (a) reversible capacity at 50 mA g−1, (b) capacity retained ratios at 1500 mA g−1 (compared to values at 50 mA g−1), and (c) cyclic stability of Sb2S3/graphene electrodes measured in PC/FEC and PMP−FSI IL electrolytes.



CONCLUSIONS

The present study found that the electrolyte formulation strongly determined the charge−discharge properties of the Sb2S3/graphene electrode. The PC-based electrolytes were more compatible than the EC/DEC-based electrolytes with the Sb2S3 electrode. Incorporation of FEC in the PC electrolyte can enhance surface passivation and improve cyclic stability of the electrode, but reduce the rate capability to some extent. However, this PC/FEC electrolyte cannot properly function at an elevated temperature. The SEI formed in the IL is effective to guarantee high electrode durability upon repeated cycling. At 60 °C, reversible capacities of 760 and 420 mAh g−1 were obtained at 50 and 1500 mA g−1, respectively, in the IL electrolyte. Moreover, 95% of the initial performance can be retained after 100 sodiation/desodiation cycles. Electrolyte engineering is crucial to achieve high-performance NIBs. In the current, an IL electrolyte is shown to be promising, especially

from 660 mAh g−1 at 25 °C to 760 mAh g−1 at 60 °C. The latter is associated with the increased ionic conductivity (see Table 2) and Na+ transference number36 and the reduced Rct at the elevated temperature (i.e., ∼300 Ω in Figure 5c vs ∼550 Ω in Figure 2e), which also boost the electrode high-rate performance in the IL electrolyte, as shown in Figure 6b. It was found that the rate capability significantly decayed at 60 °C with the PC/FEC electrolyte (Figure 6b). Since the electrolyte conductivity (see Table 2) and Na+ diffusion in the electrode should increase with increasing temperature, the deterioration in performance is attributed to the formation of a more resistive film at the electrode (see Figure 5c), which hindered Na+ migration across the interface. This is associated with the 8274

DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01939 ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 8269−8276

Research Article

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

(11) Jache, B.; Adelhelm, P. Use of graphite as a highly reversible electrode with superior cycle life for sodium-ion batteries by making use of co-intercalation phenomena. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10169−10173. (12) Hou, H.; Qiu, X.; Wei, W.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, X. Carbon anode materials for advanced sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 1602898. (13) Komaba, S.; Murata, W.; Ishikawa, T.; Yabuuchi, N.; Ozeki, T.; Nakayama, T.; Ogata, A.; Gotoh, K.; Fujiwara, K. Electrochemical Na insertion and solid electrolyte interphase for hard-carbon electrodes and application to Na-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 3859−3867. (14) Luo, X. F.; Yang, C. H.; Peng, Y. Y.; Pu, N. W.; Ger, M. D.; Hsieh, C. T.; Chang, J. K. Graphene nanosheets, carbon nanotubes, graphite, and activated carbon as anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 10320−10326. (15) Luo, X. F.; Yang, C. H.; Chang, J. K. Correlations between electrochemical Na+ storage properties and physiochemical characteristics of holey graphene nanosheets. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 17282− 17289. (16) Yu, D. Y. W.; Prikhodchenko, P. V.; Mason, C. W.; Batabyal, S. K.; Gun, J.; Sladkevich, S.; Medvedev, A. G.; Lev, O. High-capacity antimony sulphide nanoparticle decorated graphene composite as anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2922. (17) Xiong, X.; Wang, G.; Lin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ou, X.; Zheng, F.; Yang, C.; Wang, J. H.; Liu, M. Enhancing sodium-ion battery performance by strongly binding nanostructured Sb2S3 on sulfur-doped graphene sheets. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 10953−10959. (18) Yao, S.; Cui, J.; Lu, Z.; Xu, Z. L.; Qin, L.; Huang, J.; Sadighi, Z.; Ciucci, F.; Kim, J. K. Unveiling the unique phase transformation behavior and sodiation kinetics of 1D van der Waals Sb2S3 anodes for sodium ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602149. (19) Zhao, Y.; Manthiram, A. Amorphous Sb2S3 embedded in graphite: a high rate, long-life anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13205−13208. (20) Cui, J.; Yao, S.; Kim, J. K. Recent progress in rational design of anode materials for high-performance Na-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2017, 7, 64−114. (21) Hou, H.; Jing, M.; Huang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhang; Chen, J.; Wu, Z.; Ji, X. One-dimensional rod-like Sb2S3-based anode for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 19362− 19369. (22) Li, J.; Yan, D.; Zhang, X.; Hou, S.; Li, D.; Lu, T.; Yao, Y.; Pan, L. In situ growth of Sb2S3 on multiwalled carbon nanotubes as highperformance anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 228, 436−446. (23) Wang, S.; Yuan, S.; Yin, Y. B.; Zhu, Y. H.; Zhang, X. B.; Yan, J. M. Green and facile fabrication of MWNTs@Sb2S3@PPy coaxial nanocables for high-performance Na-ion batteries. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2016, 33, 493−499. (24) Ponrouch, A.; Marchante, E.; Courty, M.; Tarascon, J. M.; Palacín, M. R. In search of an optimized electrolyte for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8572−8583. (25) Komaba, S.; Ishikawa, T.; Yabuuchi, N.; Murata, W.; Ito, A.; Ohsawa, Y. Fluorinated ethylene carbonate as electrolyte additive for rechargeable Na batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4165− 4168. (26) Dahbi, M.; Nakano, T.; Yabuuchi, N.; Fujimura, S.; Chihara, K.; Kubota, K.; Son, J. Y.; Cui, Y. T.; Oji, H.; Komaba, S. Effect of hexafluorophosphate and fluoroethylene carbonate on electrochemical performance and the surface layer of hard carbon for sodium-ion batteries. ChemElectroChem 2016, 3, 1856−1867. (27) Ponrouch, A.; Goni, A. R.; Palacín, M. R. High capacity hard carbon anodes for sodium ion batteries in additive free electrolyte. Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 27, 85−88. (28) MacFarlane, D. R.; Tachikawa, N.; Forsyth, M.; Pringle, J. M.; Howlett, P. C.; Elliott, G. D.; Davis, J. H.; Watanabe, M.; Simon, P.; Angell, C. A. Energy applications of ionic liquids. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 232−250.

when cyclic stability and safety of batteries are the key concerns.



ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01939. TEM and AFM data of graphene nanosheets, XRD data of Sb2S3/graphene, TGA data of various samples, CV curves of Sb2S3/graphene electrodes recorded in various electrolytes (PDF)



AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Authors

*E-mail: [email protected] (C.-M. Tseng). *E-mail: [email protected] (J.-K. Chang). ORCID

Quan-Feng Dong: 0000-0002-4886-3361 Jeng-Kuei Chang: 0000-0002-8359-5817 Author Contributions ∇

These authors contributed equally.

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.



ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The financial support provided for this work by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan and by the Key Project of NSFC (No. U1305246) is gratefully appreciated.



REFERENCES

(1) Kundu, D.; Talaie, E.; Duffort, V.; Nazar, L. F. The emerging chemistry of sodium-ion batteries for electrochemical energy storage. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3431−3448. (2) Hwang, J. Y.; Myung, S. T.; Sun, Y. K. Sodium-ion batteries: present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3529−3614. (3) Choi, J. W.; Aurbach, D. Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16013. (4) Kim, H.; Kim, H.; Ding, Z.; Lee, M. H.; Lim, K.; Yoon, G.; Kang, K. Recent progress in electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600943. (5) Wongittharom, N.; Wang, C. H.; Wang, Y. C.; Yang, C. H.; Chang, J. K. Ionic liquid electrolytes with various sodium solutes for rechargeable Na/NaFePO4 batteries operated at elevated temperatures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 17564−17570. (6) Wang, C. H.; Yeh, Y. W.; Wongittharom, N.; Wang, Y. C.; Tseng, C. J.; Lee, S. W.; Chang, W. S.; Chang, J. K. Rechargeable Na/ Na0.44MnO2 cells with ionic liquid electrolytes containing various sodium solutes. J. Power Sources 2015, 274, 1016−1023. (7) Li, H. Y.; Yang, C. H.; Tseng, C. M.; Lee, S. W.; Yang, C. C.; Wu, T. Y.; Chang, J. K. Electrochemically grown nanocrystalline V2O5 as high-performance cathode for sodium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 285, 418−424. (8) Chandra Rath, P.; Patra, J.; Saikia, D.; Mishra, M.; Chang, J. K.; Kao, H. M. Highly enhanced electrochemical performance of ultrafine CuO nanoparticles confined in ordered mesoporous carbons as anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 14222− 14233. (9) Patra, J.; Rath, P. C.; Yang, C. H.; Saikia, D.; Kao, H. M.; Chang, J. K. Three-dimensional interpenetrating mesoporous carbon confining SnO2 particles for superior sodiation/desodiation properties. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 8674−8683. (10) Ge, P.; Fouletier, M. Electrochemical intercalation of sodium in graphite. Solid State Ionics 1988, 28−30, 1172−1175. 8275

DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01939 ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 8269−8276

Research Article

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (29) Watanabe, M.; Thomas, M. L.; Zhang, S.; Ueno, K.; Yasuda, T.; Dokko, K. Application of ionic liquids to energy storage and conversion materials and devices. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 7190−7239. (30) Wang, C. H.; Yang, C. H.; Chang, J. K. Suitability of ionic liquid electrolytes for room temperature sodium-ion battery applications. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 10890−10893. (31) Nohira, T.; Ishibashi, T.; Hagiwara, R. Properties of an intermediate temperature ionic liquid NaTFSA−CsTFSA and charge− discharge properties of NaCrO2 positive electrode at 423 K for a sodium secondary battery. J. Power Sources 2012, 205, 506−509. (32) Fukunaga, A.; Nohira, T.; Kozawa, Y.; Hagiwara, R.; Sakai, S.; Nitta, K.; Inazawa, S. Intermediate-temperature ionic liquid NaFSA− KFSA and its application to sodium secondary batteries. J. Power Sources 2012, 209, 52−56. (33) Monti, D.; Jónsson, E.; Palacín, M. R.; Johansson, P. Ionic liquid based electrolytes for sodium-ion batteries: Na+ solvation and ionic conductivity. J. Power Sources 2014, 245, 630−636. (34) Monti, D.; Ponrouch, A.; Palacín, M. R.; Johansson, P. Towards safer sodium-ion batteries via organic solvent/ionic liquid based hybrid electrolytes. J. Power Sources 2016, 324, 712−721. (35) Ding, C.; Nohira, T.; Kuroda, K.; Hagiwara, R.; Fukunaga, A.; Sakai, S.; Nitta, K.; Inazawa, S. NaFSA−C1C3pyrFSA ionic liquids for sodium secondary battery operating over a wide temperature range. J. Power Sources 2013, 238, 296−300. (36) Wongittharom, N.; Lee, T. C.; Wang, C. H.; Wang, Y. C.; Chang, J. K. Electrochemical performance of Na/NaFePO4 sodiumion batteries with ionic liquid electrolytes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 5655−5661. (37) Mohd Noor, S. A.; Howlett, P. C.; MacFarlane, D. R.; Forsyth, M. Properties of sodium-based ionic liquid electrolytes for sodium secondary battery applications. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 114, 766−771. (38) Fukunaga, A.; Nohira, T.; Hagiwara, R.; Numata, K.; Itani, E.; Sakai, S.; Nitta, K.; Inazawa, S. A safe and high-rate negative electrode for sodium-ion batteries: Hard carbon in NaFSA−C1C3pyrFSA ionic liquid at 363 K. J. Power Sources 2014, 246, 387−391. (39) Ding, C.; Nohira, T.; Hagiwara, R. A high-capacity TiO2/C negative electrode for sodium secondary batteries with an ionic liquid electrolyte. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 20767−20771. (40) Ding, C.; Nohira, T.; Hagiwara, R. Electrochemical performance of Na2Ti3O7/C negative electrode in ionic liquid electrolyte for sodium secondary batteries. J. Power Sources 2017, 354, 10−15. (41) Shimizu, M.; Usui, H.; Yamane, K.; Sakata, T.; Nokami, T.; Itoh, T.; Sakaguchi, H. Electrochemical Na-insertion/extraction properties of phosphorus electrodes in ionic liquid electrolytes. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2015, 10, 10132−10144. (42) Staudenmaier, L. Verfahren zur darstellung der graphitsaure. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1898, 31, 1481−1487. (43) Wu, J. W.; Wang, C. H.; Wang, Y. C.; Chang, J. K. Ionic-liquidenhanced glucose sensing ability of non-enzymatic Au/graphene electrodes fabricated using supercritical CO2 fluid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 46, 30−36. (44) Wu, C. H.; Wang, C. H.; Lee, M. T.; Chang, J. K. Unique Pd/ graphene nanocomposites constructed using supercritical fluid for superior electrochemical sensing performance. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 21466−21471. (45) Eshetu, G. G.; Grugeon, S.; Kim, H.; Jeong, S.; Wu, L.; Gachot, G.; Laruelle, S.; Armand, M.; Passerini, S. Comprehensive Insights into the Reactivity of Electrolytes Based on Sodium Ions. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 462−471. (46) MacFarlane, D. R.; Meakin, P.; Sun, J.; Amini, N.; Forsyth, M. Pyrrolidinium imides: a new family of molten salts and conductive plastic crystal phases. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 4164−4170. (47) Scavnicar, S. The crystal structure of stibnite a redetermination of atomic positions. Z. Kristallogr. 1960, 114, 85−97. (48) Hwang, S. M.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, Y. Na-ion storage performance of amorphous Sb2S3 nanoparticles: anode for Na-ion batteries and seawater flow batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 17946−17951.

(49) Zhu, Y.; Nie, P.; Shen, L.; Dong, S.; Sheng, Q.; Li, H.; Luo, H.; Zhang, X. High rate capability and superior cycle stability of a flowerlike Sb2S3 anode for high-capacity sodium ion batteries. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 3309−3315. (50) Xu, K. Electrolytes and interphases in Li-Ion batteries and beyond. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11503−11618. (51) Howlett, P. C.; Brack, N.; Hollenkamp, A. F.; Forsyth, M.; MacFarlane, D. R. Characterization of the lithium surface in N-MethylN-alkylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide room-temperature ionic liquid electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, A595− A606. (52) Chen, C.; Wen, Y.; Hu, X.; Ji, X.; Yan, M.; Mai, L.; Hu, P.; Shan, B.; Huang, Y. Na+ intercalation pseudocapacitance in graphenecoupled titanium oxide enabling ultra-fast sodium storage and longterm cycling. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6929−6937. (53) Ni, J.; Fu, S.; Wu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Maier, J.; Yu, Y.; Li, L. Superior sodium storage in Na2Ti3O7 nanotube arrays through surface engineering. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502568. (54) Patra, J.; Chen, H. C.; Yang, C. H.; Hsieh, C. T.; Su, C. Y.; Chang, J. K. High dispersion of 1-nm SnO2 particles between graphene nanosheets constructed using supercritical CO2 fluid for sodium-ion battery anodes. Nano Energy 2016, 28, 124−134. (55) Darwiche, A.; Bodenes, L.; Madec, L.; Monconduit, L.; Martinez, H. Impact of the salts and solvents on the SEI formation in Sb/Na batteries: An XPS analysis. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 207, 284−292. (56) Vogt, L. O.; El Kazzi, M.; Jamstorp Berg, E.; Perez Villar, S.; Novak, P.; Villevieille, C. Understanding the interaction of the carbonates and binder in Na-ion batteries: a combined bulk and surface study. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1210−1216. (57) Agubra, V. A.; Fergus, J. W. The formation and stability of the solid electrolyte interface on the graphite anode. J. Power Sources 2014, 268, 153−162. (58) Verma, P.; Maire, P.; Novák, P. A review of the features and analyses of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 6332−6341.

8276

DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01939 ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 8269−8276