Subscriber access provided by University of Glasgow Library
Biotechnology and Biological Transformations
Endophytic bacteria as contributors to theanine production in Camellia sinensis Jun Sun, Manman Chang, Haijing Li, Zhaoliang Zhang, Qi Chen, Ying Chen, Yu Yao, An Pan, Chengying Shi, Chunling Wang, Jian Zhao, and Xiaochun Wan J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b03946 • Publication Date (Web): 03 Sep 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on September 4, 2019
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Endophytic bacteria as contributors to theanine production in Camellia sinensis
2
Jun Sun#1,2,Manman Chang#1, Haijing Li1, Zhaoliang Zhang1, Qi Chen1, Ying Chen1,
3
Yu Yao2, An Pan1, Chengying Shi1, Chunling Wang1, Jian Zhao1, Xiaochun Wan*1
4 5
1State
6
University, 130 West Changjiang Road, Hefei City 230036, Anhui Province, P. R.
7
China
8
2College
9
Hefei City 230036, Anhui Province, P. R. China
Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural
of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 West Changjiang Road,
10 11
# These authors contributed equally to this work.
12
* Corresponding author:
13
Xiaochun Wan
14
Anhui Agricultural University,
15
130 West Changjiang Road, Hefei City 230036, Anhui Province, P. R. China
16
Tel: 86-0551-85786468
17
E-mail:
[email protected] 18 19
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
20
Abstract:Theanine is the most abundant non-protein amino acid in Camellia sinensis,
21
but it is not known how tea plant accumulates such high levels of theanine. The
22
endophyte isolated from in vitro grown plantlets of C. sinensis cultivars were identified
23
as Luteibacter spp., showing strong biocatalytic activity for converting both glutamine
24
and ethylamine to theanine. The theanine was secreted outside of the bacterial.
25
Endophyte isolated from in vitro plantlets of Camellia oleifera cultivar were identified
26
as Bacillus safensis, not converting glutamine and ethylamine to theanine. Enzymatic
27
assays in vitro indicated that γ-glutamyl transpeptidases rCsEGGTs from the endophyte
28
Luteibacter strains converted glutamine and ethylamine into theanine at higher rates
29
than rCsGGTs from C. sinensis. This is the first report on theanine biosynthesis by an
30
endophyte from C. sinensis, which provide a new pathway to explore the mechanism
31
of theanine biosynthesis in C. sinensis and the interactions between endophyte and tea
32
plants.
33 34
Keywords: Camellia sinensis; Endophytic bacteria; Luteibacter sp.; Theanine; γ-
35
glutamyltranspeptidase; Glutamine synthetase; Theanine synthetase.
36 37 38 39 40 41 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 35
Page 3 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
42
1
Introduction
43
Tea is the second most popular beverage worldwide, savored for its unique flavor and
44
aroma. The health benefits of tea are due to several special metabolites produced by the
45
tea plant Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze. Theanine (γ-glutamyl ethylamine) is one of
46
these special metabolites. Theanine accumulates in tea plants but is rarely produced in
47
other plants, and if it does occur, it is at low levels. Theanine is an important indicator
48
in the qualitative assessment of green tea because it confers the particular umami taste
49
to brewed tea.1 Consumers of tea benefit from the biological functions of theanine,
50
which include improvement of memory and learning by activating relative central
51
neurotransmitters, protection against vascular diseases, and promotion of relaxation and
52
concentration by inhibiting the effects of caffeine.2 Theanine also has neuroprotective
53
and antiobesityfunctions and enhances antitumor activities.3 Moreover, theanine
54
performs important physiological functions in plants. Theanine is a unique non-protein
55
amino acid and accounts for more than 70% of the total free amino acids in the shoots
56
of C. sinensis.4 Similar to glutamine (Gln), theanine plays important roles in the
57
nitrogen cycle, especially in ammonia detoxification via the conversion of toxic
58
ammonia into a nontoxic amino acid form.5 As theanine has important functions in both
59
humans and plants, there is great interest in determining its distribution, accumulation,
60
and biosynthesis in tea. Theanine is present in a variety of Camellia species, and it is
61
highly abundant in C. sinensis, the species used to produce tea.5 Theanine was also
62
detected in several plants in the Order Ericales, a plant in the Order Aquifoliales, and
63
in the edible mushroom Xerocomusbadius.6 In C. sinensis, theanine is biosynthesized 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
64
by theanine synthetase (TS), which is very similar to glutamine synthetase (GS) in DNA
65
sequence and enzymatic activity.5, 7 TS is the only enzyme known to produce theanine
66
in plants and, thus far, has only been found in C. sinensis.8 In free-living bacteria,
67
theanine is biosynthesized by GGT from Bacillus subtilis9 and GS from the strain
68
Pseudomonas taetrolens Y-30.10 The transpeptidation reaction of GGT is one of the
69
most effective methods to synthesize theanine, since the enzyme source is readily
70
available and can be cultured and since the reaction is fast and does not require ATP.9-
71
10
72
until unknown why highly abundant theanine only occurs in C. sinensis plants.
73
In our previous study, we found that the in vitro-grown tea plantlets could secret yellow
74
endophytic bacteria into medium, and the presence of the endophyte does not cause any
75
apparent symptoms of tea plantlets in vitro.11 Many endophytes do produce a number
76
of important, bioactive secondary metabolites. Endophytes can provide these
77
metabolites to their hosts, thereby contributing to the performance, growth and stress
78
tolerance of plants.12 Some metabolites might be produced by both the endophyte and
79
the host.13 The right endophyte/host pair may be able to produce higher levels of a
80
natural secondary metabolite when working together. It has been reported that many
81
endophytic bacteria colonize C. sinensis14 and free-living bacteria are able to produce
82
theanine.15 However, there are no relevant studies on the production of theanine by
83
endophytes isolated from plants, including tea trees.
84
In the present study, we successfully isolated endophytic bacteria that are able to
85
produce theanine from the tea cultivars ‘Shuchazao’, ‘Wuniuzao’, ‘Longjing No.43’,
While the GGT and GS enzymes were found in both bacterial and plant species, it is
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 35
Page 5 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
86
and ‘Yunkang No.10’. The endophytic bacteria were identified as members of the genus
87
Luteibacter (Order Xanthomonadales, Family Rhodanobacteraceae) based on 16S
88
rDNA gene sequences.16 Analysis of the enzymatic activities of CsGGTs and CsTS1,
89
isolated from C. sinensis, and CsEGGTs and CsEGSs, isolated from the endophytes,
90
showed that the CsEGGTs were much more active than the CsGGTs. Our results
91
showed that endophytic bacteria could convert both Gln and ethylamine to theanine,
92
and could also convert Gln and other amino acids to theanine without ethylamine. The
93
results of this study help to explain why high theanine levels only occur in C. sinensis
94
plants. The results also provide a novel insight into the mechanism of theanine
95
biosynthesis and may be useful for breeding and quality improvement of C. sinensis.
96 97
2
Materials and Methods
98
2.1 Plant materials
99
Leaves of tea (C. sinensis) cultivar ‘Shuchazao’ were harvested from the Dechang tea
100
plantation (Shucheng, Anhui, China). Plantlets of the tea cultivars ‘Shuchazao’ from
101
Anhui Province, ‘Wuniuzao’ and ‘Longjing No.43’ from Zhejiang Province, ‘Yunkang
102
No.10’ from Yunnan Province and C. oleifera ‘Changlin No.4’ from Anhui Province
103
were grown in vitro.17
104
2.2 Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from C. sinensis and C.
105
oleifera
106
Shoots of C. sinensis ‘Shuchazao’, ‘Wuniuzao’, ‘Longjing No.43’, ‘Yunkang No.10’
107
and C. oleifera ‘Changlin No.4’ were used to establish plantlets in vitro.17 From these 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
108
sterile-grown plantlets, leaves of ‘Shuchazao’, ‘Wuniuzao’, ‘Longjing No.43’,
109
‘Yunkang No.10’ and ‘Changlin No.4’ were removed, cut into 5 mm × 10 mm segments,
110
placed on Luria–Bertani (LB) medium, and cultured at 28°C. After the emergence of
111
bacteria colonies (2-10 days), the mixed bacteria were transferred onto fresh LB
112
medium,18 and labeled ‘CsE-SCZm’, ‘CsE-WNZm’, ‘CsE-LJm’, ‘CsE-YKm’ and
113
‘CoE-CLm’ for the cultivar from which they were recovered.
114
Identification of the endophytic bacteria from C. sinensis and C. oleifera was done on
115
the basis of cell morphology, gram stain19 and subsequent 16S rDNA gene sequence
116
similarity. Total DNA was extracted from pure bacterial colonies using Bacteria
117
Genomic DNA Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China) and was used as the template for PCR. A
118
portion of the 16S rDNA gene was amplified by PCR using the primers 16S-PA and
119
16S-PB (Table S1).20 The PCR products of the expected size (about 1,500 bp) were
120
purified using a DNA Gel Extraction Kit, cloned into the pEASY-Blunt Zero vector,
121
and sequenced (BGI, Shanghai, China). The phylogenetic tree was generated by the
122
neighbor-joining method within the MEGA 7.0 program using 1,000 bootstrap
123
replications.21
124
2.3 Detection methods of theanine products by Ultra Performance Liquid
125
Chromatography (UPLC)-QQQ-MS/MS
126
The Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC)-MS/MS system (Palo Alto,
127
CA, USA) was used to detect theanine products in this study. A Thermo Fisher
128
Accucore RP-MS column (particle size of 2.6 µm, 100 mm in length, and internal
129
diameter of 2.1 mm) was used at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min-1. The method has been 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 35
Page 7 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
130
improved based on previous reports.22
131
The column oven temperature was set at 30℃. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1%
132
acetic acid in water and 100% methyl alcohol, the equivalent elution was carried out
133
with 90% methanol and 10% acetic acid in water and was held for at 10 minutes. Mass
134
spectra were acquired simultaneously using electrospray ionization in the positive
135
ionization mode over the range of m/z 50 to 500.7, 23
136
2.4 Theanine production of endophytic bacteria isolated from in vitro-grown tea
137
plantlets
138
The endophytic bacteria ‘CsE-SCZm’, ‘CsE-WNZm’, ‘CsE-LJm’, and ‘CsE-YKm’
139
from C. sinensis and ‘CoE-CLm’ from C. oleifera were cultured to the logarithmic
140
growth phase in LB medium for inoculation onto fresh LB medium at a ratio of 1:1000.
141
These cultures were grown at 28℃ and 220 rpm. Once cultures reached an OD600 of
142
1.0, substrates were added to a final concentration of 20 mM Gln and 20 mM
143
ethylamine hydrochloride. Controls were bacterial cultures without substrates (Gln and
144
ethylamine hydrochloride) and LB medium without bacteria but with 20 mM Gln and
145
20 mM ethylamine hydrochloride. Cultures were incubated for 7 d. The bacterial
146
solutions were subjected to thermal cracking in a 100°C water bath for 30 min,
147
centrifugated at 10000 ×g for 15 min, the supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 µm
148
membrane, then to identify the product of theanine by UPLC-MS/MS.
149
2.5 Theanine synthesis and secretion in monoclones of endophytic bacteria
150
Ten monoclones of endophytic bacteria isolated from ‘Shuchazao’ were randomly
151
picked, numbered CsE1 to CsE10, and subcultured to the logarithmic growth phase. 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
152
The bacterial cultures were inoculated to fresh LB medium at a ratio of 1:1000 and
153
cultured again at 28℃ and 220 rpm. Once cultures reached an OD600 of 1.0, substrates
154
were added to the final concentration of 20 mM Gln and 20 mM ethylamine
155
hydrochloride. Cultures in LB without the substrates and uninoculated LB medium with
156
20 mM Gln and 20 mM ethylamine hydrochloride were used as controls. Samples were
157
removed from the cultures on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 15, prepared as above and
158
subjected to UPLC-MS/MS for detection of theanine. The supernatant of bacterial
159
cultures with 20 mM Gln and 20 mM ethylamine hydrochloride at 5 d and 7 d were
160
used to detect the secretion of theanine from the endophytic bacteria.
161
2.6 Plant RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
162
Total RNA was prepared from tea leaves harvested from ‘Shuchazao’ using RNAprep
163
Pure Plant Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s
164
instructions. cDNA, synthesized by reverse transcription from the total RNA using
165
PrimeScript RT Master Mix (Takara, Dalian, China), was used as the template for RT-
166
PCR cloning of CsGGT2, CsGGT4 and CsTS1 using primers listed in Table S1.
167
2.7 Cloning of CsGGTs, CsTS1, CsEGGTs and CsEGSs genes
168
Primers CsGGT2-pMAL-SalⅠ-F/R and CsGGT4-pMAL-SalⅠ-F/R were used to
169
amplify CsGGT genes from cDNA of the tea cultivar ‘Shuchazao’. CsTS1 was cloned
170
using primers CsTS1-pMAL-BamHⅠ-F/R. Primers CsEGGT-pMAL-SalⅠ-F/R and
171
CsEGS-pMAL-BamHⅠ-F/R were used to amplify CsEGGT and CsEGS from strain
172
CsE7 and CsE8 isolates from ‘Shuchazao’, respectively (Table S1).
173
2.8 Heterologous expression in Escherichia coli and recombinant protein 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 35
Page 9 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
174
purification
175
The full-length ORFs of the CsGGTs and CsTS1 from C. sinensis and the CsEGGTs
176
and CsEGSs from endophytic bacteria were subcloned into the expression vector
177
pMAL-c5x, which contained an maltose binding protein (MBP) tag of size 42.5 kDa.
178
The recombinant plasmids were transferred into E. coli BL21 (DE3) (Transgen, Beijing,
179
China). After the sequence of target genes were confirmed, the E. coli BL21 strain
180
transformed with the target genes were cultured at 37°C in the LB medium containing
181
100 µg/mL ampicillin and grown to an OD600 of 0.6-0.8. Isopropyl-β-D-
182
thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at a final concentration of 0.1 mM was added to the cell
183
culture, which was cultured at 16°C for another 24 h to induce the expression of
184
recombinant proteins.7,
185
chromatography using amylase resin (New England Biolabs, MA, USA) and detected
186
by SDS-PAGE gel analysis.21b,
187
activity assays in vitro.
188
2.9 Enzymatic assays
189
The products of the enzymatic reactions were detected by UPLC-MS/MS to verify the
190
function of the recombinant proteins rCsGGTs, rCsEGGTs, rCsTS1 and rCsEGSs. The
191
activity of GGT was determined by the method of Orlowski and Meister with slight
192
modification.26 The basic reaction buffer contained 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 20 mM
193
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT. Reaction mixtures of 1mL contained 100 µL of
194
recombinant protein (50 µg purified recombinant protein rCsGGTs or rCsEGGTs) and
195
900 µL basic reaction buffer with 20 mM Gln and 50 mM ethylamine hydrochlorideas
24
The recombinant proteins were purified by affinity
25
The purified recombinant proteins were used in
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
196
substrate. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 10 h and terminated by
197
heating at 96°C for 2 min.27 The reactions were repeated in triplicate. For the reaction
198
of recombinant proteins rCsTS1 and rCsEGS, in addition to the 100 µL of recombinant
199
protein (50 µg purified recombinant protein rCsTS1 or rCsEGSs), 900 µL basic reaction
200
buffer with 20 mM Glu and 50 mM ethylamine hydrochloride, 10 µM ATP was added
201
as an energy source for the GS enzyme. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 30°C
202
for 10 h and terminated by heating at 96°C for 2 min.28 The reactions were repeated in
203
triplicate. Reactions with protein extracts from cultures carrying the pMAL-c5x vector
204
were used as controls.
205
2.10 Precursors of theanine synthesis in endophytic bacteria
206
Colonies of strain CsE7, isolated from ‘Shuchazao’, were randomly selected and
207
cultured to an OD600 of 1.0. This culture was diluted into fresh LB and cultured with 20
208
mM Gln and 20 mM of anyone of 18 different amino acids, namely Gln (double supply
209
of Gln), Glycine (Gly), Alanine (Ala), Valine (Val), Leucine (Leu), Isoleucine (Ile),
210
Phenylalanine (Phe), Asparagine (Asn), Glutamic acid (Glu), Lysine (Lys),
211
Methionine (Met), Serine (Ser), Threonine (Thr), Proline (Pro), Histidine (His),
212
Arginine (Arg), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), or Citrulline (Cit). Negative controls
213
were (1) cultures in LB without Gln or an additional amino acid and (2) a set of flasks
214
containing LB medium with 20 mM Gln and 20 mM of one of the 18 amino acids but
215
no bacteria. The positive control was bacteria cultured with 20 mM Gln and 20 mM
216
ethylamine hydrochloride. The cultures were grown for 7 d before isolation and
217
detection of theanine by UPLC-MS/MS. 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 35
Page 11 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
218
2.11 Statistical analysis
219
Data collected in this study was subjected to analysis of variance expressed as means ±
220
standard deviations and statistically analysed using Duncan’s tests. All experiments
221
were measured in thrice (3 replicates). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and
222
multiple comparisons with Latin square design (LSD) were conducted to test the
223
differences between groups using SPSS 16.0 software. A p-value ≤0.01 was considered
224
to be statistically significant.
225 226
3
Results
227
3.1 Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from C. sinensis and C.
228
oleifera
229
In order to understand the influence of producing areas on endophytic bacteria in C.
230
sinensis and the difference between C. sinensis and C. oleifera, shoots of C. sinensis
231
‘Shuchazao’ from Anhui Province, ‘Wuniuzao’ and ‘Longjing No.43’ from Zhejiang
232
Province, ‘Yunkang No.10’ from Yunnan Province and C. oleifera ‘Changlin No.4’
233
from Anhui Province were used to establish plantlets in vitro (Figure 1a, b, c, d, e).
234
Leaves from the in vitro-grown plantlets were cut into segments and inserted into LB
235
medium. After 2 to 3 days, yellow bacteria began to appear on the medium in contact
236
with the four C. sinensis cultivars (Figure 1f, g, h, i). The endophytic bacteria were
237
subcultured onto fresh LB medium. After 2 to 3 days on LB agar the colonies were 1.0
238
to 2.0 mm in diameter, yellow-pigmented, smooth, circular, and convex (Figure 1k).
239
The endophytic bacteria secreted by the C. sinensis cultivars were Gram-negative 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
240
bacteria (Figure 1l).29 The endophytic bacteria from C. oleifera were secreted into the
241
medium after 5 to 7 days (Figure 1j). The colonies were milky yellow, opaque, round
242
or nearly round, dull, and with uneven edges and a protrusion in the center (Figure 1m).
243
The endophytic bacteria secreted by C. oleifera ‘Changlin No.4’ were Gram-positive
244
bacteria (Figure 1n).30
245
Part of the 16S rDNA sequences of ten monoclones of the endophytic bacteria isolated
246
from the four C. sinensis cultivars and the one C. oleifera cultivar were determined and
247
compared with available 16S rDNA sequences. The partial 16S rDNA sequences of the
248
endophytic bacteria strains from the C. sinensis cultivars showed high homology (99%
249
identity) with Luteibacter sp. (GenBank accession no. KM187159). The 16S rDNA
250
sequence from the endophyte isolated from C. oleifera shared 100% identity with
251
Bacillus safensis (GenBank accession no. CP032830) (Figure 1o). The colony
252
morphology, Gram staining and phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rDNA gene
253
sequences indicated that the endophytes from C. sinensis ‘Shuchazao’, ‘Wuniuzao’,
254
‘Longjing No.43’, ‘Yunkang No.10’ are belong to Luteibacter species and the
255
endophytes from C. oleifera ‘Changlin No.4’ are B. safensis.
256
3.2 Endophytic bacteria from C. sinensis produce theanine
257
In order to understand the role of endophytic bacteria on the theanine production of C.
258
sinensis and C. oleifera, seven-day-old cultures of the mixed endophytes CsE-SCZm,
259
CsE-WNZm, CsE-LJm, CsE-YKm and CoE-CLm subcultured in LB medium
260
containing Gln and ethylamine hydrochloride were extracted for detection of theanine
261
by UPLC-MS/MS, respectively. The results showed that the endophytic bacteria 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 35
Page 13 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
262
isolated from the four C. sinensis cultivars could produce theanine when supplied with
263
the substrates. Among them, CsE-WNZm produced a relatively high content of
264
theanine, of 6.45 mg/L, followed by CsE-SCZm (4.87 mg/L), CsE-LJm (4.18 mg/L),
265
and CsE-YKm (3.73 mg/L). Cultures lacking the substrates produced little theanine.
266
No theanine was detected after seven days of culture of the endophyte CoE-CLm from
267
C. oleifera in the presence or absence of Gln and ethylamine hydrochloride (Figure 2).
268
3.3 Production and secretion of theanine by the endophytic Luteibacter
269
To further study the theanine-producing abilities of the isolated endophytes, ten
270
monoclones of the bacteria isolated from C. sinensis ‘Shuchazao’ were cultured in LB
271
for 7 days containing Gln and ethylamine hydrochloride. The results showed that all
272
ten monoclones from C. sinensis ‘Shuchazao’ had the ability to synthesize theanine,
273
and there are no significant difference among them. The yield of theanine was 3.06
274
mg/L - 4.23 mg/L (Figure 3a).
275
In order to learn theanine production and secretion by the endophytic Luteibacter sp.,
276
endophyte strain CsE7 from C. sinensis ‘Shuchazao’ was randomly selected and used
277
to study a time course of theanine production (Figure3b). Liquid cultures of strain CsE7
278
were incubated in LB medium containing Gln and ethylamine hydrochloride for 1, 3,
279
5, 7, 10, and 15 days and were used to detect theanine. At 5 and 7 days, the theanine
280
produced by strain CsE7 and secreted to the medium was detected and compared with
281
the total yield of theanine in the disrupted bacteria solution. With the proper
282
supplements, strain CsE7 rapidly produced theanine, yielding a maximum of 3.83 mg/L
283
at 7 d of cultivation, before levels reduced to about 1.65 mg/L at 15 d of cultivation. 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
284
About 90% of the produced theanine was excreted into the culture broth (Figure 3c).
285
No theanine was detected in bacteria-free LB medium containing the substrates during
286
cultivation. However, theanine was detected in the endophyte culture without the
287
substrates, but the theanine content was highest, at 0.6 mg/L, on the first day and then
288
decreased over the cultivation period (Figure 3b).
289
3.4 Polymorphism analysis of CsGGTs, CsTS1, CsEGGT and CsEGS
290
In the present study, two CsGGT genes from C. sinensis were obtained and identified
291
as homologous to AtGGT2 and AtGGT4 of Arabidopsis, and numbered CsGGT2 (1722
292
bp) and CsGGT4 (1887 bp), respectively. CsTS1 was obtained with a length of 2532
293
bp.8 CsE7GGT, CsE7GS, CsE8GGT, and CsE8GS were obtained from the endophyte
294
strains CsE7 and CsE8 with the lengths of 1743 bp, 1410 bp, 1746 bp and 1044 bp,
295
respectively. Two phylogenetic trees were constructed along with previously identified
296
GGTs and GSs with known functions, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis resulted in
297
the formation of four GGT clusters, clusters I to Ⅳ (Figure 4a). Cluster I consisted of
298
GGTs from prokaryotic organisms; cluster II consisted of GGTs from animals; and
299
clusters III and Ⅳ consisted of GGTs from eukaryotic plants. CsE7GGT and CsE8GGT,
300
from the endophyte strains CsE7 and CsE8, were placed into cluster I with GGTs from
301
other prokaryotes, including EcGGT ( P18956) from E. coli K12 and BsGGT (P54422)
302
from B. subtilis 168, which had the ability to convert Gln and ethylamine to theanine.
303
CsGGT2 and CsGGT4 were placed into cluster III and Ⅳ.
304
For the GSs, the phylogenetic analysis based on the amino acid sequences resulted in
305
five clusters (Figure 4b). Cluster I consisted of GSs from prokaryotic organisms28a and 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 35
Page 15 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
306
some GSs from eukaryotic plants. Cluster II consisted of GSs from animals. The plant
307
GSs were divided into three distinct clusters, III, Ⅳ and Ⅴ. Previous studies viewed
308
CsGS1 as the best TS gene candidate, and it has been renamed CsTS1, through its high
309
homology with PtGS from the bacterium P. taetrolens.8, 10 Our results showed that
310
CsTS1, from C. sinensis, was placed into cluster I with CsE7GS and CsE8GS, from the
311
endophyte from C. sinensis, and GSs from other prokaryotes.
312
Multiple sequence alignments of the CsGGT and CsEGGT homologs revealed that the
313
functional motifs were conserved, including the catalytic threonine (Thr-391 in
314
EcGGT), as the nucleophile responsible for both the autoprocessing and the enzymatic
315
activity, and the two Gly residues (Gly483–Gly484 in EcGT) proposed to have a role
316
in the stabilization of the tetrahedral transition state of the enzyme (Figure S1).31 The
317
multiple sequence alignment of CsTS1, CsE7GS and CsE8GS homologs was further
318
optimized to provide the maximum conservation of 15 key active-site residues
319
identified from the crystal structure of the S. typhimurium (SALTY) GSI (Figure S2).28b,
320
32
321
3.5 CsEGGTs from entophytic Luteibacter converted Gln and ethylamine into
322
theanine at higher rates than CsGGTs from C. sinensis
323
To compare the enzymatic synthesis of theanine with CsGGTs and CsTS1 from C.
324
sinensis and CsEGGTs and CsEGSs from entophyte Luteibacter, the recombinant
325
proteins rCsGGT2, rCsGGT4, rCsTS1, rCsE7GGT, rCsE8GGT, rCsE7GS and
326
rCsE8GS were purified by affinity chromatography using amylose resin. The molecular
327
weights of the purified rCsGGT2, rCsGGT4, rCsTS1, rCsE7GGT, rCsE8GGT, 15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
328
rCsE7GS and rCsE8GS proteins were approximately 104.3 kDa, 110.5 kDa, 136.0 kDa,
329
104.3 kDa, 104.4 kDa, 94.5 kDa and 90.0 kDa, respectively, which were basically
330
consistent with their predicted molecular weights in addition to that of MBP (42.5 kDa)
331
(Figure S3).
332
A series of enzymatic activity assays were conducted on the GGTs and GSs in vitro,
333
with the products identified using UPLC-MS/MS. The relative catalytic activities of
334
rCsGGT2, rCsGGT4, rCsE7GGT and rCsE8GGT proteins were determined by
335
comparing the yield of theanine at the same unit of protein under the same in vitro
336
reaction conditions. The specific activity of the purified recombinant proteins rCsGGT2,
337
rCsGGT4, rCsE7GGT and rCsE8GGT were 1.36 µkat/μg, 0.94 µkat/μg, 431.86
338
µkat/μg, and 299.17 µkat/μg, respectively (Figure 4c). In this enzymatic assay, the
339
theanine-producing ability of rCsE7GGT, from the endophyte CsE7, was 318 times
340
higher than that of rCsGGT2 and 459 times higher than that of rCsGGT4, both from C.
341
sinensis. Theanine production of rCsE8GGT, from the endophyte CsE8, was 220 and
342
318 times higher than that of rCsGGT2 and rCsGGT4, from C. sinensis, respectively.
343
The results showed that both recombinant proteins from the endophytes, rCsE7GGT
344
and rCsE8GGT, have significant abilities to convert Gln and ethylamine to theanine in
345
vitro.
346
The relative catalytic activities of recombinant proteins rCsTS1, rCsE7GS and
347
rCsE8GS were determined in vitro. The specific activity of the purified recombinant
348
proteins rCsTS1, rCsE7GS and rCsE8GS were 0.80 µkat/μg, 0.33 µkat/μg, and 0.49
349
µkat/μg, respectively (Figure 4d). The results showed that the recombinant proteins, 16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 35
Page 17 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
350
rCsTS1 from C. sinensis and rCsE7GS and rCsE8GS from the endophytes, have the
351
ability to convert glutamic acid (Glu) and ethylamine to theanine in vitro.
352
3.6 Lys could be closer than other amino acids to theanine in biosynthetic pathway
353
in endophyte Luteibacter
354
The above results showed that the endophytic bacteria strain CsE7, isolated from C.
355
sinensis ‘Shuchazao’, had the ability to synthesize theanine in LB medium without the
356
substrates Gln or ethylamine. In order to explore the metabolic pathway of theanine in
357
the endophytic bacteria, Gln and anyone of 18 amino acids, namely Gln, Gly, Ala, Va,
358
Leu, Ile, Phe, Asn, Glu, Lys, Met, Ser, Thr, Pro, His, Arg, GABA or Cit, were provided
359
to the strain CsE7 as substrates. Cultures grown for 7 days were used to detect theanine
360
by UPLC-MS/MS. The yield of theanine by CsE7 ranged from 6.18 to 31.87 µg/L when
361
these different amino acids were used as substrates (Table S2). The highest yield of
362
theanine occurred when Lys was used as a substrate (31.87 µg/L) compared to 9.67
363
µg/L when Ala was used. The yield of theanine by CsE7 was 3.74µg/L in LB medium
364
when no other substance was added. No theanine was detected in bacteria-free LB
365
medium containing Gln and anyone of the 18 amino acids. The results showed that the
366
strain CsE7 could convert Gln and anyone of 18 different amino acids into theanine and
367
that the conversion efficiency of Lys to theanine was higher than the conversion
368
efficiencies of other amino acids, which suggests that Lys could be closer than other
369
amino acids to theanine in biosynthetic pathway in endophyte Luteibacter.
370 371
4
Discussion 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
372
Theanine is an important secondary metabolite in C. sinensis, as it affects tea leaf
373
quality while also serving as a reservoir for nitrogen, as a building block for skeletal
374
carbon compounds, and as a molecule in developmental physiology.1 Scientists have
375
sought the mechanisms of theanine biosynthesis. In the present study, theanine was
376
found to be biosynthesized by endophytic bacteria isolated from tea plants from the
377
substrates Gln and ethylamine and from Gln and other amino acids. The theanine
378
biosynthesized by endophytic bacteria was secreted out of the bacterial cells (Figure 5).
379
It has been reported that theanine is synthesized from Glu and ethylamine by theanine
380
synthetase (CsTS) in the roots of the tea plants, from where it is then translocated to the
381
apical bud and subtending three leaves.1 In the present study, endophytic bacteria in the
382
genus Luteibacter were identified by 16S rDNA sequences as isolates from in vitro-
383
grown tea plantlets derived from axillary buds of four different C. sinensis cultivars
384
from different Provinces, namely ‘Shuchazao’ from Anhui Province, ‘Wuniuzao’ and
385
‘Longjing No.43’ from Zhejiang Province, and ‘Yunkang No.10’ from Yunnan
386
Province. Further, these endophytes were shown to produce and secrete theanine.
387
Theanine-production of moderate levels (3.73 mg/L to 6.45 mg/L) could be achieved
388
by these endophytes (CsE-YKm, CsE-LJm, CsE-SCZm, and CsE-WNZm) after 7 d of
389
incubation without optimization of the bioconversion conditions. However, an
390
endophytic bacteria isolated from in vitro-grown plantlets of C. oleifera cultivar
391
‘Changlin No.4’ from Anhui Province, B. safensis, could not produce theanine. This is
392
the first documentation, to our knowledge, of a contribution of an endophytic
393
Luteibacter sp. to theanine biosynthesis in C. sinensis plants. 18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 35
Page 19 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
394
In free-living bacteria, theanine is produced by GS,10 γ-Glutamylmethylamide
395
synthetase,28b and GGT.33 GGT seems to be better at producing theanine since it can
396
use a wide range of substrates as the γ-glutamyl acceptor and since it does not require
397
ATP for its transferase activity.34 However, the above enzymes producing theanine
398
were from free-living bacteria. Our results showed that CsE7GGT and CsE8GGT,
399
isolated from endophytic Luteibacter strains CsE7 and CsE8 isolated from C. sinensis,
400
produce theanine. The enzyme activities of rCsE7GGT and rCsE8GGT from the
401
endophytic Luteibacter strains were much greater than those of rCsGGT2 and
402
rCsGGT4 from tea. This study is the first report of GGTs and GSs producing theanine
403
from an endophytic bacteria, a Luteibacter sp. isolated from C. sinensis and GGTs
404
producing theanine from C. sinensis (Figure 5). Further research is needed to reveal
405
whether there are other genes, from Luteibacter or other endophytes, that can produce
406
theanine while associated with C. sinensis.
407
Ethylamine availability is regarded as the limiting factor for accumulation of theanine
408
in C. sinesis.7 Our results showed that ethylamine could be converted to theanine by the
409
endophytes from C. sinensis. It has been proposed that Ala could be the closest
410
precursor of ethylamine, through enzymatic decarboxylation of Ala in the biosynthetic
411
pathway.25 Recently, the gene CsAlaDC encoding Ala decarboxylase (CsAlaDC) was
412
identified in tea plants and CsAlaDC could catalyze the decarboxylation of Ala.25 These
413
results provide important information about the theanine biosynthesis pathway,
414
however, the results of this study indicate that the conversion efficiency of Gln and Ala
415
to theanine by the endophyte CsE7, isolated from C. sinensis, were not the highest, 19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
416
however, the conversion efficiency of Gln and Lys to theanine by the endophyte CsE7
417
was about three times the rate of Gln and Ala, which suggests that there are other
418
metabolite pathways for driving amino acids into theanine and that Ala may not be the
419
closest precursor to theanine in the biosynthetic pathway. It needs to be clarified
420
whether there is another biosynthesis pathway that produces theanine but that does not
421
rely on ethylamine.
422
As the most important abundant non-protein amino acid in tea plants, theanine is
423
involved in ammonia detoxification, via the conversion of toxic ammonia into the
424
nontoxic amino acid form, and serves as an energy source and precursor for the
425
biosynthesis of various bioactive molecules.5 The data here shows that endophytic
426
bacteria such as Luteibacter could play important roles in nitrogen assimilation in C.
427
sinensis. The results reported here merit further research to determine the mechanisms
428
responsible for moderating the endophytic relationship between C. sinensis and
429
Luteibacter and how these two organisms work together to produce theanine in tea.
430
In this study, we isolated the endophytic bacteria from in vitro grown plantlets of C.
431
sinensis cultivars were identified as Luteibacter spp.. The endophyte Luteibacter
432
showed strong biocatalytic activity for converting both glutamine and ethylamine to
433
theanine, which was secreted outside of the bacterial. But the endophytic bacteria
434
isolated from in vitro plantlets of C. oleifera cultivar were identified as Bacillus safensis,
435
not converting glutamine and ethylamine to theanine. The γ-glutamyl transpeptidases
436
rCsEGGTs from the endophytic Luteibacter strains converted glutamine and
437
ethylamine into theanine at higher rates than rCsGGTs from C. sinensis. 20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 35
Page 21 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
438 439
Acknowledgements
440
This work was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of China through the
441
Earmarked Fund for China Agricultural Research System (No. CARS 19), and the
442
National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31170283).
443 444
Declaration of Interest Statement
445
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
446 447
Author contributions
448
XC Wan and J Sun conceived and designed the research; MM Chang, HJ Li, Q Chen,
449
Y Chen, Y Yao, A Pan, and CL Wang performed the research and wrote the paper; ZL
450
Zhang, CY Shi, and J Zhao revised the manuscript.
451 452
Supporting informations
453
Figure S1 Multiple sequence alignments of CsGGTs, CsE7GGT and CsE8GGT
454
(marked by light green shadows) homologs revealed the conservation in the functional
455
motifs, including the catalytic threonine (Thr-391 in EcGGT), as the nucleophile
456
responsible for both the auto processing and the enzymatic activity, and the two Gly
457
residues (Gly483–Gly484 in EcGT) proposed to have a role in the stabilization of the
458
tetrahedral transition state of the enzyme were enclosed in red boxes and marked with
459
red asterisks below the alignment. The other residues responsible for substrate binding 21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
460
and catalytic activity of the γ-GGTs are highlighted in yellow (T409, N411, D433, S462,
461
and S463 in EcGGT).
462
Figure S2 Multiple sequence alignments of CsTS1, CsE7GS and CsE8GS (marked by
463
light green shadows) homologs; the percentage identity between the sequences at each
464
residue is indicated by the shading: blue-black (100%), dark gray (75%), and light gray
465
(50%). The red asterisks below the alignment indicate the amino acids in the S.
466
typhimurium GS involved in the active site.
467
Figure S3 SDS-PAGE analysis of purified recombinant proteins rCsGGT2, rCsGGT4,
468
rCsE7GGT, rCsE8GGT, rCsTS1, rCsE7GS, rCsE8GS and pMAL-c5x vector protein
469
expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) culture supernatants. Molecular masses in kDa of
470
protein standards are designated in red letters. rCsGGT4 has two subunits (red ellipse)
471
of about 38 to 45 kDa; rCsEGGT7 and rCsEGGT8 have a large subunit (blue ellipse)
472
of about 90 kDa and a small subunit (green ellipse) of about 20 kDa.
473
Table S1 Primers sequences for PCR used in this study
474
Table S2 Role of amino acids in theanine biosynthesis by the endophytic bacteria
475
strain CsE7
476 477
References
478
1.
in tea. Food chemistry 2018, 242, 601-610.
479 480 481
Sharma, E.; Joshi, R.; Gulati, A., L-Theanine: An astounding sui generis integrant
2.
Milne, A. L., The effects of L-theanine, caffeine and their combination on cognition and mood. Biological psychology 2008, 77 (2), 113-122. 22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 35
Page 23 of 35
482
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
3.
Liu, Q.; Duan, H.; Luan, J.; Yagasaki, K.; Zhang, G., Effects of theanine on growth
483
of human lung cancer and leukemia cells as well as migration and invasion of
484
human lung cancer cells. Cytotechnology 2009, 59 (3), 211-217.
485
4.
Deng, W.-W.; Ogita, S.; Ashihara, H., Biosynthesis of theanine (γ-ethylamino-L-
486
glutamic acid) in seedlings of Camellia sinensis. Phytochemistry Letters 2008, 1
487
(2), 115-119.
488
5.
Ashihara, H., Occurrence, biosynthesis and metabolism of theanine (γ-glutamyl-
489
L-ethylamide)
490
Communications 2015, 10 (5), 803-810.
491
6.
in
plants:
a
comprehensive
review.
Natural
Product
Casimir, J.; Jadot, J.; Renard, M., Séparation et caractérisation de la N-éthyl-γ-
492
glutamine à partir de Xerocomus badius. BBA - Biochimica et Biophysica Acta
493
1960, 39 (3), 462-468.
494
7.
Cheng, S.; Fu, X.; Wang, X.; Liao, Y.; Zeng, L.; Dong, F.; Yang, Z., Studies on
495
the Biochemical Formation Pathway of the Amino Acid L-Theanine in Tea
496
(Camellia sinensis) and Other Plants. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
497
2017, 65 (33), 7210-7216.
498
8.
Wei, C.; Yang, H.; Wang, S.; Zhao, J.; Liu, C.; Gao, L.; Xia, E.; Lu, Y.; Tai, Y.;
499
She, G.; Sun, J.; Cao, H.; Tong, W.; Gao, Q.; Li, Y.; Deng, W.; Jiang, X.; Wang,
500
W.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, S.; Li, H.; Wu, J.; Wang, P.; Li, P.; Shi, C.; Zheng, F.; Jian,
501
J.; Huang, B.; Shan, D.; Shi, M.; Fang, C.; Yue, Y.; Li, F.; Li, D.; Wei, S.; Han,
502
B.; Jiang, C.; Yin, Y.; Xia, T.; Zhang, Z.; Bennetzen, J. L.; Zhao, S.; Wan, X.,
503
Draft genome sequence of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis provides insights into 23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
504
the evolution of the tea genome and tea quality. Proceedings of the National
505
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2018, 115 (18), E4151-
506
E4158.
507
9.
Shuai, Y.; Zhang, T.; Mu, W.; Jiang, B., Purification and characterization of
508
gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase from Bacillus subtilis SK11.004. Journal of
509
agricultural and food chemistry 2011, 59 (11), 6233-6238.
510
10. Yamamoto, S.; Wakayama, M.; Tachiki, T., Cloning and expression of
511
Pseudomonas taetrolens Y-30 gene encoding glutamine synthetase: an enzyme
512
available for theanine production by coupled fermentation with energy transfer.
513
Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry 2006, 70 (2), 500-507.
514
11. Brader, G.; Compant, S.; Mitter, B.; Trognitz, F.; Sessitsch, A., Metabolic
515
potential of endophytic bacteria. Current opinion in biotechnology 2014, 27, 30-
516
37.
517
12. Azevedo, J. L.; Maccheroni, W.; Pereira, J. O.; De Araújo, W. L., Endophytic
518
microorganisms: a review on insect control and recent advances on tropical plants.
519
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 1998, 3 (1), 40-65.
520
13. Van Elst, D.; Nuyens, S.; van Wyk, B.; Verstraete, B.; Dessein, S.; Prinsen, E.,
521
Distribution of the cardiotoxin pavettamine in the coffee family (Rubiaceae) and
522
its significance for gousiekte, a fatal poisoning of ruminants. Plant physiology and
523
biochemistry : PPB 2013, 67, 15-19.
524
14. Rabha, A. J.; Naglot, A.; Sharma, G. D.; Gogoi, H. K.; Gupta, V. K.; Shreemali,
525
D. D.; Veer, V., Morphological and molecular diversity of endophytic 24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 35
Page 25 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
526
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides from tea plant, Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze
527
of Assam, India. Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology 2016, 14 (1), 181-
528
187.
529
15. Shuai, Y.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, B.; Mu, W., Development of efficient enzymatic
530
production of theanine by gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase from a newly isolated
531
strain of Bacillus subtilis SK11.004. Journal of the science of food and agriculture
532
2010, 90 (15), 2563-2567.
533
16. Naushad, S.; Adeolu, M.; Wong, S.; Sohail, M.; Schellhorn, H. E.; Gupta, R. S.,
534
A phylogenomic and molecular marker based taxonomic framework for the order
535
Xanthomonadales: proposal to transfer the families Algiphilaceae and
536
Solimonadaceae to the order Nevskiales ord. nov. and to create a new family
537
within the order Xanthomonadales, the family Rhodanobacteraceae fam. nov.,
538
containing the genus Rhodanobacter and its closest relatives. Antonie van
539
Leeuwenhoek 2015, 107 (2), 467-485.
540
17. Sun, J.; Lei, P. D.; Zhang, Z. Z.; Shi, G. H.; Tang, Z. J.; Zhu, S. Y.; Jiang, C. J.;
541
Wan, X. C., Shoot basal ends as novel explants for in vitro plantlet regeneration
542
in an elite clone of tea. Journal of Pomology & Horticultural Science 2012, 87 (1),
543
71-76.
544
18. Fouda, A. H.; Hassan, E. D.; Ewais, E. D., Biotechnological applications of fungal
545
endophytes associated with medicinal plant Asclepias sinaica (Bioss.). Annals of
546
Agricultural Sciences 2015, 60 (1), 95-104.
547
19. Buck, J. D., Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of gram reactions of 25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
548
marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982, 44 (4), 992-993.
549
20. (a) Jasim, B.; Joseph, A. A.; John, C. J.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E. K.,
550
Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic bacteria from
551
the rhizome of Zingiber officinale. 3 Biotech 2014, 4 (2), 197-204; (b) Shi, Y.; Lou,
552
K.; Li, C., Promotion of plant growth by phytohormone-producing endophytic
553
microbes of sugar beet. Biology & Fertility of Soils 2009, 45 (6), 645-653.
554
21. (a) Barroso, C. M. L.; Schneider, H.; Schneider, M. P. C.; Sampaio, I.; Harada, M.
555
L.; Czelusniak, J.; Goodman, M., Update on the Phylogenetic Systematics of New
556
World Monkeys: Further DNA Evidence for Placing the Pygmy Marmoset
557
( Cebuella ) within the Genus Callithrix. International Journal of Primatology
558
1997, 18 (4), 651-674; (b) Dai, X.; Zhuang, J.; Wu, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhao, G.; Liu,
559
Y.; Jiang, X.; Gao, L.; Xia, T., Identification of a Flavonoid Glucosyltransferase
560
Involved in 7-OH Site Glycosylation in Tea plants (Camellia sinensis). Scientific
561
reports 2017, 7 (1), 5926, 1-14.
562
22. Jiang, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Zhao, L.; Meng, F.; Wang, Y.; Tan, H.; Yang, H.; Wei,
563
C.; Wan, X., Tissue-specific, development-dependent phenolic compounds
564
accumulation profile and gene expression pattern in tea plant (Camellia sinensis).
565
PloS one 2013, 8 (4), e62315, 1-14.
566
23. Bedner, M.; Sander, L. C.; Sharpless, K. E., An LC-ESI/MS method for
567
determining theanine in green tea dietary supplements. Analytical and
568
bioanalytical chemistry 2010, 397 (5), 1773-1777.
569
24. Saini, M.; Bindal, S.; Gupta, R., Heterologous expression of gamma-glutamyl 26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 35
Page 27 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
570
transpeptidase from Bacillus atrophaeus GS-16 and its application in the synthesis
571
of gamma-D-glutamyl-L-tryptophan, a known immunomodulatory peptide.
572
Enzyme and microbial technology 2017, 99, 67-76.
573
25. Bai, P.; Wei, K.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F.; Ruan, L.; Li, H.; Wu, L.; Cheng, H.,
574
Identification of a Novel Gene Encoding the Specialized Alanine Decarboxylase
575
in Tea (Camellia sinensis) Plants. Molecules 2019, 24 (3), 540, 1-15.
576
26. Orlowski, M.; Meister, A., γ -Glutamyl- P -nitroanilide: A new convenient
577
substrate for determination and study of L - and D -γ-glutamyltranspeptidase
578
activities. Biochim Biophys Acta 1963, 73 (4), 679-681.
579
27. (a) Chen, X.; Su, L.; Wu, D.; Wu, J., Application of recombinant Bacillus subtilis
580
γ-glutamyltranspeptidase to the production of L-theanine. Process Biochemistry
581
2014, 49 (9), 1429-1439; (b) Lin, L. L.; Chou, P. R.; Hua, Y. W.; Hsu, W. H.,
582
Overexpression, one-step purification, and biochemical characterization of a
583
recombinant gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase from Bacillus licheniformis. Applied
584
microbiology and biotechnology 2006, 73 (1), 103-112.
585
28. (a) Silva, L. S.; Seabra, A. R.; Leitao, J. N.; Carvalho, H. G., Possible role of
586
glutamine synthetase of the prokaryotic type (GSI-like) in nitrogen signaling in
587
Medicago truncatula. Plant science : an international journal of experimental
588
plant biology 2015, 240, 98-108; (b) Yamamoto, S.; Wakayama, M.; Tachiki, T.,
589
Cloning and expression of Methylovorus mays No. 9 gene encoding gamma-
590
glutamylmethylamide synthetase: an enzyme usable in theanine formation by
591
coupling with the alcoholic fermentation system of baker's yeast. Bioscience, 27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
592
biotechnology, and biochemistry 2008, 72 (1), 101-109.
593
29. Bresciani, F. R.; Santi, L.; Macedo, A. J.; Abraham, W.-R.; Vainstein, M. H.;
594
Beys-da-Silva, W. O., Production and activity of extracellular lipase from
595
Luteibacter sp. Annals of Microbiology 2013, 64 (1), 251-258.
596
30. Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y., Isolation and Characterization of Fibrinolytic Enzyme-
597
producing Strain DC-4 from Chinese Douchi and Primary Analysis of the Enzyme
598
Property. High Technology Letters 2002, 12 (2), 30-34.
599
31. Castellano, I.; Merlino, A., gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidases: sequence, structure,
600
biochemical properties, and biotechnological applications. Cellular and molecular
601
life sciences : CMLS 2012, 69 (20), 3381-3394.
602
32. Torreira, E.; Seabra, A. R.; Marriott, H.; Zhou, M.; Llorca, O.; Robinson, C. V.;
603
Carvalho, H. G.; Fernandez-Tornero, C.; Pereira, P. J., The structures of cytosolic
604
and plastid-located glutamine synthetases from Medicago truncatula reveal a
605
common and dynamic architecture. Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological
606
crystallography 2014, 70 (Pt 4), 981-993.
607
33. Zhang, F.; Zheng, Q. Z.; Jiao, Q. C.; Liu, J. Z.; Zhao, G. H., Synthesis of theanine
608
from glutamic acid gamma-methyl ester and ethylamine catalyzed by Escherichia
609
coli having gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase activity. Biotechnology letters 2010,
610
32 (8), 1147-1150.
611
34. Verma, V. V.; Gupta, R.; Goel, M., Phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis of
612
functional divergence among Gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) subfamilies.
613
Biology direct 2015, 10, 49, 1-21. 28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 35
Page 29 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
614 615
Figures:
616 617
Figure 1 Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from C. sinensis and
618
C. oleifera. Tea cultivars ‘Shuchazao’, ‘Wuniuzao’, ‘Longjing No.43’, ‘Yunkang 29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
619
No.10’ and oil tea plantlets ‘Changlin No.4’ were grown in vitro (a, b, c, d, e). Leaves
620
of the four C. sinensis cultivars and the one C. oleifera cultivar were cut into 5 mm ×
621
10 mm segments and inserted into LB medium in vitro. After 2 to 3 days, yellow
622
bacteria from C. sinensis (f, g, h, i) and, after 5 to 7 days, milky yellow bacteria from
623
C. oleifera were secreted onto medium (j). Colony morphology of the endophytic
624
bacteria isolated from C. sinensis were 1.0 to 2.0 mm in diameter, yellow-pigmented
625
smooth, circular, and convex (k). Observation of endophytic bacteria from C. oleifera
626
showed that the colony was milky yellow, opaque, round or nearly round, dull, and with
627
uneven edges, and a protrusion in the center (m); Endophytic bacteria from C. sinensis
628
were identified as Gram-negative bacteria (l) and from C. oleifera as Gram-positive
629
bacteria (n) by Gram Staining; Phylogenetic analysis of partial 16S rDNA sequence of
630
isolates from C. sinensis and C. oleifera (o). Numbers in parentheses represent the
631
sequence accession numbers in GenBank. The endophytic bacteria isolated from C.
632
sinensis and C. oleifera were classified as ‘CsE’ and ‘CoE’ (displayed in red and green
633
shadows), and marked with red and blue dots, respectively. Tree building was
634
performed using MEGA 7.0 software with the neighbor-joining method. Bar, 0.020
635
substitutions per nucleotide position. Scale bar, 2 mm in (a-j, and k, m), 20 µm in (l, n).
636
30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 35
Page 31 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
637 638
Figure 2 Identification of endophytic Luteibacter sp. from C. sinensis produce
639
theanine. The mixed endophytes CsE-SCZm, CsE-WNZm, CsE-LJm, CsE-YKm and
640
CoE-CLm, were subcultured in LB medium containing 20 mM Gln and 20 mM
641
ethylamine
642
SCZm, CsE-WNZm, CsE-LJm, CsE-YKm and CoE-CLm subcultured in LB medium
643
without substrates (CsE-SCZm/WNZm/LJm/YKm and CoE-CLm), or in LB medium
644
containing
645
SCZm/WNZm/LJm/YKm+ and CoE-CLm+) were collected for detection of theanine
646
by UPLC-MS/MS. LB with substrates was used as control (LB+). Values are means ±
647
SD, n = 3. Asterisks indicate the statistical significance between exogenous and non-
648
exogenous substrates determined by Duncan’s tests (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). (b) HPLC
649
chromatogram and MS/MS analyses of the theanine standard (black peak), the
650
endophytic Luteibacter sp. from C. sinensis with substrates (CsE+, red peak), without
651
substrates (CsE, blue peak) are shown, and the mass spectrometric result of the
652
chromatographic peak Indicated by black circle is shown.
hydrochloride, respectively. (a) Seven-day-old cultures of the strains CsE-
20
mM
Gln
and
20
mM
ethylamine
653
31
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
hydrochloride
(CsE-
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 32 of 35
654 655
Figure 3 Production and secretion of theanine by monoclones of endophytic
656
Luteibacter sp.. (a) Ten monoclones (CsE1 to CsE10) of endophytic bacteria isolated
657
from C. sinensis ‘Shuchazao’ were cultured in LB containing 20 mM Gln and 20 mM
658
ethylamine hydrochloride (LB+) or in LB without substrates (LB). Cultures after seven
659
days were used to detect theanine by UPLC-MS/MS. Values are means ± SD, n = 3. (b)
660
Time course of theanine production by the endophytic bacteria Luteibacter CsE7
661
isolated from C. sinensis ‘Shuchazao’. Strain CsE7 was incubated in 50 mL liquid LB
662
medium containing 20 mM Gln and 20 mM ethylamine hydrochloride
663
columns) or in LB without substrates (CsE7, gray column) for 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 or 15d. The
664
theanine contents are marked with red (with substrates) or yellow (without substrates)
665
trend lines. Values are means ± SD, n = 3. Asterisks indicate the statistical significance
666
among different incubation time determined by Duncan’s tests(*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).
667
(c) Secretion of theanine production by endophytic bacteria CsE7 isolated from C.
668
sinensis ‘Shuchazao’. Values are means ± SD, n = 3.
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
(CsE7+, black
Page 33 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
669 670
Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships and the enzymatic activities of GGTs and
671
GSs/TS from C. sinensis and the endophytic Luteibacter. Two unrooted phylogenetic
672
trees were constructed using MEGA 7.0 software with the neighbor-joining method.
673
The phylogenetic tree of the GGTs was classified into four clusters (I,II, III and IV,
674
distinguish by shadows and titles with different colors) (a), while that of the GSs/TS
675
were classified into five clusters (I,II, III, IV and V) (b), based on the GGT and GS
676
amino acid sequences together with available gene sequences from prokaryotes,
677
animals, and other plants, respectively. Red asterisks represent genes from endophytes
678
and blue asterisks represent genes from tea plants. (c) Enzymatic activity of purified
679
recombinant proteins rCsGGT2, rCsGGT4, rCsE7GGT, rCsE8GGT and pMAL-c5x
680
vector protein analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS in vitro. (d) Enzymatic activity of purified
681
recombinant proteins rCsTS1, rCsE7GS, rCsE8GS and pMAL-c5x vector protein
682
analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS in vitro. Values are means ± SD, n = 3. Asterisks indicate 33
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
683
the statistical significance among different recombinant proteins determined by
684
Duncan’s tests (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).
685
686 687
Figure 5 Schematic overview showing that both the tea plant and the endophyte
688
from C. sinensis synthesize theanine. Glu: Glutamate; Gln: Glutamine; CsEGGT: γ-
689
glutamyltranspeptidase of endophyte; CsEGS: glutamine synthetase of endophyte;
690
CsGGT: γ-glutamyltranspeptidase of tea plant; CsTS: glutamine synthetase of tea plant
691
Wei et al. (2018); CsAlaDC, alanine decarboxylase of tea plant Bai et al. (2019).The
692
lines with arrows show the biosynthetic pathways of theanine in tea plants and
693
endophytic Luteibacter sp. from C. sinensis, respectively. Different color lines
694
represent different metabolic pathways. and the thickness of the lines represents the
695
strength of the metabolic function. The figure is based on the information provided in
696
Sharma et al., 2018, with permission.
697 34
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 34 of 35
Page 35 of 35
698 699
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
For Table of Contents Only
700
35
ACS Paragon Plus Environment