Enhancing photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cells by down

Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST

Article

Enhancing photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cells by down-conversion Eu-complex Ling Jiang, Wangchao Chen, Jia-Wei Zheng, Liang-Zheng Zhu, Li'e Mo, Zhao-Qian Li, Linhua Hu, Tasawar Hayat, Ahmed Alsaedi, Changneng Zhang, and Songyuan Dai ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b10101 • Publication Date (Web): 28 Jul 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 30, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Enhancing Photovoltaic Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells by down-conversion Eu-complex

Ling Jiang1,2, Wangchao Chen1,2, Jiawei Zheng1,2, Liangzheng Zhu1,2, Li’e Mo1, Zhaoqian Li1, Linhua Hu1, Tasawar Hayat3, Ahmed Alsaedi3, Changneng Zhang1*, Songyuan Dai4*

1

Key Laboratory of Photovolatic and Energy Conservation Materials, Institute of

Applied Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, 230088, P. R. China 2

University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, P. R. China

3

NAAM Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King

Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia 4

Beijing Key Laboratory of Novel Thin Film Solar Cells, North China Electric Power

University, Beijing, 102206, P. R. China

Abstract Organometal halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have shown high photovoltaic performance but poor utilization of ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. Lanthanide complexes have a wide absorption range in the UV region and they can down-convert the absorbed UV light into visible light, which provides a possibility for PSCs to utilize UV light for higher photocurrent, efficiency and stability. In this study, we

use

a

transparent

luminescent

down-converting

layer

(LDL)

of

Eu-4,7-diphenyl-1,10-Phenanthroline (Eu-complex) to improve the light utilization efficiency of PSCs. Comparing with the uncoated PSC, the PSC coated with Eu-complex LDL on the reverse of FTO glass displayed an enhancement of 11.8% in short-circuit current density (Jsc) and 15.3% in efficiency due to the Eu-complex LDL of re-emitting UV light (300-380 nm) in the visible range. It is indicated that the Eu-complex LDL plays the role of enhancing power conversion efficiency (PCE) as well 1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

as reducing UV degradation for PSCs. Keywords: down-conversion; Eu-complex; luminescent; UV stability; perovskite solar cells

1. Introduction Recently, organometal halide perovskites have been considered as one kind of promising photoelectric conversion material for perovskite solar cells (PSCs) due to the advantages of high light absorption coefficient [1,2], narrow band gap [3], great charge carrier mobilities [4,5], nanoscale structures [6] and simple synthetic method [7,8]. On the basis of above advantages, PSCs have exhibited outstanding character of photoelectric conversion and one certified PCE of 22.1% [9]. Generally, the spectral response range of PSCs is mainly concentrated in the visible region (about 44% of the total incident solar irradiation). This brings a major issue for the light-harvesting of PSCs, since 50% of solar irradiation lies in the ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) regions, thus, the active device can not use it, which limits the light conversion efficiency for PSCs. To improve the light utilization efficiency of PSCs, researchers have utilized different fabrication methods, such as photoanodes modification [10-12], halogen ion doping [13-15] and HTMs design [16-18]. Moreover, the UV filter film, fluorescent carbon dots or Zinc phthalocyanine are used to mitigate UV degradation for better performance of perovskite [19-21]. However, these methods can not directly improve the spectral response of PSCs. Lanthanide luminescence is an ideal candidate for extending the spectral response range of PSCs to the UV region. Lanthanide ions have the ability of absorbing UV light and re-emitting visible light due to the specific 4f electronic structure [22-24]. Hence, applying lanthanide luminescence down-conversion technology to PSCs is a powerful approach to enhance the PSCs efficiency while reduce the UV degradation to improve the PSCs stability [25]. Several researches of using lanthanide luminescence to improve the photovoltaic performance of PSCs have been proposed [26-28]. However, the spectral response of the material based inorganic host (YVO4:Eu3+, ZnGa2O4:Eu3+ or CeO2:Eu3+) is narrow or near far ultraviolet which could impede the 2


Page 2 of 42

Page 3 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


larger part availability of UV light. Lanthanide complexes posses with a broad band absorption in the UV region, and can effectively transfer the absorbed UV energy to lanthanide ions (i.e. antenna effect), which could help PSCs to achieve higher photocurrent, efficiency and stability. At present, there is little study on the utilization of lanthanide complexes for PSCs to enhance the photovoltaic performance. Europium (Eu3+) is one of the most efficient down-converting ion which has high emission intensity [29], and 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline as a ligand (phenanthroline derivative) with wide UV absorption is matched well with Eu3+ ion. In this work, we propose the use of Eu-4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (Eu-complex) for increasing the light-harvesting of PSCs. A transparent luminescent down-converting layer (LDL) consisted of Eu-complex is placed on the reverse of FTO glass of the device. The coating converts the UV light (300-380 nm) to visible light that match the absorption of PSCs and increases the utilization of the incident solar light. In compare to the devices uncoated with LDL, those with LDL show greatly increased photocurrent density and PCE. And also, UV stability of PSCs without package is enhanced.

2. Materials and methods Materials.

Europium

(III)

nitrate

hexahydrate

and

4,7-diphenyl-

1,10-phenanthroline were purchased from J&K. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (K 30) was obtained

from

TCI.

Lead

(II)

iodide,

dimethyl

sulfoxide,

lithium

bis(trifluoromethylsulphonyl) imide (Li-TFSI), 4-tert-butylpyridine (TBP) and titanium isopropoxide were purchased from Aldrich. Methylammonium Iodide and Spiro-MeOTAD

were

obtained

from

Xi’an

p-OLED.

Acetylacetone,

N,N-dimethylformamide, ethanol and chlorobenzene were from Sinopharm. TiO2 paste (18 NRT) was purchased from Dyesol. All chemicals were commercially available and used without further purification. Synthesis of Eu-complex LDL. Firstly, 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (2 mmol), was dissolved well in 20 mL of ethanol. Then 1 mmol of Eu(NO3)3·6H2O in 20 mL of ethanol was slowly added to the above solution while constant stirring the mixture 3



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

for better reaction. After magnetic stirring the mixed solution for half an hour, a white colored precipitate of Eu-complex was formed. And then the complex was purified by centrifugation and washed with ethanol for 3 times and then dried at 40 °C for 12 h. Secondly, the as-prepared Eu-complex in the range of 0.5 to 1.5 wt% (High content more than 1.5 wt% can not completely dissolve) was added to ethanol containing 2 g of PVP, magnetic stirring the mixed solution for two hours to ensure it was dissolved completely. Then the mixed solution was used to form film on the back surface of the FTO glass by spin-coating method and dried at 60 °C to remove ethanol shown in figure 1.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration for preparing Eu-complex luminescent down-converting layer (LDL).

Device fabrication. For the fabrication of PSCs, a TiO2 precursor solution (7 mL of anhydrous isopropanol containing 0.6 mL of titanium diisopropoxide and 0.4 mL of bis (acetylacetonate)) was sprayed on patterned FTO substrates at 460 °C to form the dense blocking layer of TiO2. The mesoporous TiO2 layer was prepared by spin-coating of the diluted TiO2 paste at 4000 rpm for 20 s. The substrates were dried at 80 °C and then annealed at 500 °C for 30 min. The CH3NH3PbI3 layer was formed by two-step spin-coating method. 50 μL mixed solution of PbI2 and CH3NH3I was deposited onto the mesoporous TiO2 layer at 1000 rpm for 20 s and 4000 rpm for 30 s, at the last 10 s before the end of the second spin-coating step, the substrates were treated with chlorobenzene. And then, the substrates were annealed at 105 °C for 1 h. Spiro-MeOTAD was used as the HTM layer and was put on the CH3NH3PbI3 layer by spin-coating of 30 μL prepared solution (72.3 mg, 28.8 μL 4-tert-butylpyridine, 17.5 μL lithium bis (trifluoromethylsulphonyl) imide and 8 μL Co (III)-complex dissolved in 1 mL chlorobenzene) at 3000 rpm for 20 s. Finally, Au back electrode with a thickness of 60 nm was thermally evaporated on the HTM layer. 4


Page 4 of 42

Page 5 of 42

Characterization. The morphologies of the LDLs (surface and cross-sectional) and the PSCs (cross-sectional) as well as the EDX spectrum of LDL were all investigated by scanning electron microscopy (FEI XL-30 SFEG coupled to a TLD). The UV-vis absorption spectra and transmission spectra were examined using the U-3900H UV-vis spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan). Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (QM400-TM, America). The J-V curves were measured using a solar simulator (solar AAA simulator, Oriel USA) with a source meter (Keithley Instruments, Inc., OH) at 100 mW/cm2, AM 1.5 G illumination. The irradiance was calibrated using a Si-reference cell certified by NREL. With a 50 mV/s of scan rate, the applied bias voltages for the reverse scan and forward scan were from 1.2 to −0.1 V and from −0.1 to 1.2 V. The photovoltaic performance of our devices is not confirmed from independent certification laboratories. The forward bias for stability characterization of the PSC with Eu-complex was held colse to 0.802 V. The active area was attached with a mask of 0.09 cm2. The IPCE values were carried out as a function of wavelength from 300 to 900 nm (PV Measurements, Inc.). The UV light-soaking test was under a light source (UV-Hg-2000, Beijing Lighting Research Institute, China). There was no control about the over temperature and relative humidity levels during the measurements and the PSCs were not encapsulated. To avoid errors, the validity of solar cell data was checked and measured according to previous reports [30-34]. 3. Results and Discussion a

b

319 nm

2.4

0.0 wt% 0.5 wt% 1.0 wt% 1.5 wt%

2.0 1.6

316 nm

0.0 wt% 0.5 wt% 1.0 wt% 1.5 wt%

80

60

T (%)

Abs (a.u.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


1.2

40 0.8

313 nm

20

0.4 0.0

0 300

320

340

360

380

400

420

300

400

500

600

700

800

Wavelength (nm)

Wavelengh (nm)

Figure 2. UV-Vis absorption spectra (a) and transmission spectra (b) of Eu-complex LDL (Eu-complex content: 0.0 wt%, 0.5 wt%, 1.0 wt%, 1.5 wt%). 5



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 2a shows the UV-vis absorption spectra of LDL with different Eu-complex content from 0.0 wt% to 1.5 wt% in PVP. The LDL without Eu-complex (pure PVP) shows almost no absorption, indicating that the PVP will not much affect the passing light. The LDLs with Eu-complex display a strong and broad absorption band corresponding to the π→π* transition of the ligand in Eu-complex and with the increase in the content of Eu-complex it becomes more intense. But when the content is more than 1.5 wt%, the LDL becomes no transparent to impede the passage of visible light. Furthermore, the absorption peak shows a small red shift of 3 nm from 313 to 316 nm and 6 nm from 313 to 319 nm when the Eu-complex content is 1.0 wt% and 1.5 wt% respectively. This is caused by the increase of attractive polarization forces between Eu-complex and PVP, which lower the energy level of the excited state in Eu-complex, resulting in a slightly reduction of the energy difference between the excited and unexcited states. The absorption band from 300 to 380 nm of Eu-complex LDL makes it possible to absorb the UV light widely. The transmission spectra of LDL with different Eu-complex doping concentration are shown in Figure 2b. It is found that the transmittance of LDL without Eu-complex (only PVP) is above 60% in the range of 300-380 nm, revealing that most of the light can pass through the PVP. While with the increase of the doping concentration, the transmittance of LDL contained Eu-complex is decreased gradually from 45% to 15% and these results are consistent with that of the absorption. Furthermore, all the LDLs have a higher transmittance in the visible light range which means that the spectral response of the LDL is concentrated in the ultraviolet region.

6


Page 6 of 42

Page 7 of 42

a

b

5

Intensity (a.u.)

λ em= 614 nm

7

D0 → F 1

5

7

D0→ F0

320

340

360

380

400

420

0.5 wt% 1.0 wt% 1.5 wt% λex= 320 nm

5

5

300

7

D0 → F 2

0.5 wt% 1.0 wt% 1.5 wt% Intensity (a.u.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


500

550

Wavelength (nm)

D0→ F4

650

700

D0→ F3

600

7

7

5

750

Wavelength (nm)

Figure 3. (a) PL excitation spectra of Eu-complex LDLs. (b) PL emission spectra of Eu-complex LDLs (Eu-complex content: 0.5 wt%, 1.0 wt%, 1.5 wt%).

The PL excitation spectra of as synthesized LDL with Eu-complex (0.5 wt%, 1.0 wt%, 1.5 wt%, 1.5 wt%) are shown in Figure 3a. The intense and broad excitation band from 300 to 380 nm in the UV region is attributed to the ligand (4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline) in Eu-complex. With the increase of Eu-complex content in PVP, the excitation band intensity enhances gradually, that is the same as the trend in absorption. It should be noticed that there also appears a slight red shift in the excitation spectra when increase the Eu-complex content, further revealing the interaction between Eu-complex and PVP. The excitation band from 300-340 nm is matched with the absorption spectra, confirming the energy is entirely transferred from ligand to Eu3+ ions in Eu-complex, as it is expected. The highly effective energy transfer from ligand to Eu3+ ions makes it possible to sensitize Eu3+ ions well even in the region of 340-380 nm with weak absorption intensity. Meanwhile, the wide spectral response performance of 1.5 wt% content of Eu-complex in PVP makes it suitable for using in active PSC devices as down conversion materials. Whereas Eu-complex LDL shows several PL peaks at 578, 519, 614, 652 and 700 nm are assigned to the electronic transition of 5D0→7F0, 5D0→7F1, 5D0→7F2, 5D0→7F3 and 5

D0→7F4 forbidden transitions of Eu3+, respectively (Figure 3b). A bit wide peak of

Eu-complex LDL is caused by the coordination between PVP and Eu-complex. The emission spectra show the characteristic red luminescence of the trivalent europium ion upon UV excitation and the luminescence intensity variation is following the 7



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

changes in excitation spectra. The Eu-complex with the quantum yield of 37% introduced in PVP effectively converts the higher-energy photons in near-UV region of the solar spectrum into lower-energy photons of long wavelengths, which is well matching the absorption spectrum of the perovskite layer. It is found that Eu-complex in PVP as effective down-conversion material could convert UV light into visible range and help to broaden the absorption scope of the PSCs.

Figure 4. Schematic illustration explaining the mechanism of enhanced photoelectric performance of PSC by the transparent Eu-complex LDL (1.5 wt% content of Eu-complex in PVP).

The schematic structure of the PSC coating Eu-complex LDL (1.5 wt%) is shown in Figure 4. When the radiant light enters into PSCs from FTO side coated with Eu-complex LDL, most low energy photons (visible light) pass through the LDL and are absorbed by perovskite layer, while some high energy photons (UV light) are absorbed by the LDL and then converted into low energy photons (red light) for perovskite layer. This help to improve the utilization of ultraviolet light, extend the spectral response range to the UV region and reduce the charge loss in PSCs, which is better for the PSC stability [35].

8


Page 8 of 42

Page 9 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 5. (a) SEM image of 1.5 wt% Eu-complex LDL. (b) Cross-sectional SEM image of PSC with 1.5 wt% Eu-complex LDL on the back surface of FTO glass (back side of the device). (c) Cross-sectional SEM image of the PSC with 1.5 wt% Eu-complex LDL (front side of the device). (d) EDX spectrum of 1.5 wt% Eu-complex LDL. (e) Digital photograph of 1.5 wt% Eu-complex LDL when exposed to UV light at 320 nm.

Figure 5a shows the SEM image of 1.5 wt% Eu-complex LDL. It is showed that the surface morphology of Eu-complex LDL is uniform and there is no obvious impurity in it. The thickness of the LDL is about 1 µm as shown in figure 5b. Figure 5c displays the cross-sectional SEM images of PSC with 1.5 wt% Eu-complex LDL (front side of the device), and from it we can learn that the perovskite layer of the PSC has a uniform thickness and flat surface, which helps to achieve better photovoltaic performance. To investigate the elemental composition of Eu-complex LDL, energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis was carried out. As shown in Figure 5d the EDX spectrum of the LDL shows obvious diffraction peaks from C, N and O elements, in addition, some slender peaks of the element Eu also appear in the EDX spectrum, which proves the presence of Eu in the LDL. When exposed to UV light at 320 nm, Eu-complexes

in

PVP

emit

red

light

and

down-conversion fluorescence emission properties (Figure 5e).

9


exhibit excellent


b 80

70

70

60

60

50

0.0 wt% 1.5 wt%

40 30

40 30

20

20

10

10

0 300

400

500

0.0 wt% 1.5 wt%

50

IPCE (%)

IPCE (%)

a 80

600

700

0 300

800

310

320

330

Wavelength (nm)

340

350

360

370

380

Wavelength (nm)

Figure 6. IPCE curves of PSCs with Eu-complex LDL (Eu-complex content: 0.0 wt%, 1.5 wt%)

To confirm the influence of Eu-complex LDL on the spectral photoelectric response of PSCs, the incident photon to current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra of both the best PSCs with and without Eu-complex in LDL was measured in the wavelength range from 300 to 850 nm (Figure 6a). As expected from former discussion, in the range of 300-380 nm, the IPCE curves of both the PSCs share extremely different profiles (Figure 6b). The difference in UV region is caused by the Eu-complex and the IPCE value of PSC with Eu-complex in LDL shows clearly enhancement compared with that of PSC without Eu-complex in LDL, indicating that the spectral response of PSC is improved by Eu-complex LDL. IPCE curves for both cells exhibited similar profiles from 400 to 850 nm, where the Eu-complex LDL shows no absorption. The current enhancement by Eu-complex LDL is pronounced in short-wavelengths, and the integral current in the range of 300-850 nm increased from 16.28 to 16.76 mA/cm2. The IPCE enhancement is benefit for the improved photovoltaic performance of PSC owing to the UV light absorption and subsequent red emission. a 20

b 30 PCE

25

16

0.0 wt%-Reverse 0.0 wt%-Forward 1.5 wt%-Reverse 1.5 wt%-Forward

12

8 Sample 0.0 wt%

4

1.5 wt%

V oc (V) Reverse Forward Reverse Forward

1.03 1.02 1.05 1.05

2

J sc (mA/cm ) 17.27 17.05 19.30 19.21

FF (%)

PCE (%)

73.54 71.22 75.95 71.67

13.14 12.36 15.44 14.51

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

12

Jsc 15

8 10 4

5

0 0.0

20

0

1.0

PCE (%)

2

2

Current Density (mA/cm )

16

Current density (mA/cm )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 42

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 300

Time (s)

Voltage (V)

Figure 7. (a) J-V curves of reverse and forward scans (1 sun, AM1.5G) for the PSCs with 10


Page 11 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Eu-complex LDL (Eu-complex content: 0.0 wt%, 1.5 wt%). (b) Photocurrent density and PCE as a function of time for the PSC with 1.5 wt% Eu-complex LDL held close to 0.802 V forward bias.

The current density-voltage (J-V) plots spectra for the best devices of PSC without and with Eu-complex LDL are shown in figure 7a almost without hysteresis. For the PSC without Eu-complex LDL, a short-circuit current density Jsc of 17.27 mA·cm2, open-circuit photovoltage Voc of 1.03 V and a fill factor of 73.54% were obtained, which correspond to a holistic power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 13.14%. When the content of Eu-complex up to 1.5 wt%, resulting in a 17.5% increase in Jsc from 13.14 to 15.44 mA·cm2. The enhanced photocurrent is partly due to the improved absorption in the region of 300-380 nm wavelengths as seen from the IPCE spectra (Figure 6b). On the other hand, it is because of the better structure of perovskite (uniform thickness and flat surface) in the PSC. As the LDL converts UV light into visible light, it helps to avoid the damage caused by UV light to the perovskite structure. Consistent with the former analysis, the PCE of PSC with 1.5 wt% Eu-complex is higher than that of PSC without Eu-complex because of the increase of UV utilization and the decline of UV degradation by Eu-complex. Since, the down-converting material provides additional red photons, which are rapidly absorbed by the perovskite absorber material, giving rise to the observed photocurrent enhancement shown in IPCE. Moreover, there is a slightly enhancement in the value of photovoltage. The use of down-converting phosphor material has been shown to lead to the improvement of short wavelength spectral response because parts of the UV spectrum are converted to visible region, which is then absorbed by the active material [36]. The photocurrent density and PCE as a function of time for the PSC with 1.5 wt% Eu-complex LDL held close to 0.802 V forward bias is shown in Figure 7b. The photocurrent density and a PCE over 15% of the PSC remained stable within 300 s, suggesting that Eu-complex LDL is conducive to an efficient and stable PSCs under light illumination.

11



a

b

16 15

19

PCE (%)

2

Jsc (mA/cm )

14 13 12 11 10

18

17

9 8

0.0 wt%

0.0 wt%

1.5 wt%

1.5 wt%

d 78

c 1.06

76 74

FF (%)

Voc (V)

1.04 1.02

72 70

1.00

68 0.98

66

1.5 wt%

0.0 wt%

0.0 wt%

1.5 wt%

Figure 8. Performance parameter distributions of 20 PSCs without Eu-complex LDL and 20 PSCs with 1.5 wt%-Eu-complex LDL: (a) PCE, (b) Jsc, (c) Voc and (d) FF (reverse scan from 1.2 to -0.1 V).

The performance parameter distributions of both 20 PSCs without/with Eu-complex LDL are summarized in Figure 8. Obviously, the Jsc is significantly enhanced with the application of Eu-complex LDL by converting UV light. To confirm the effect of Eu-complex LDL on the stability of PSC, we conducted a UV light-soaking measurement on both PSCs without and with Eu-complex. The variations of the solar cell parameters with time of the two types of PSCs are plotted in Figure 9.

b 1.0

0.8

0.8

Normalized Jsc

a 1.0 Normalized PCE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 42

0.6 0.4

0.0 wt% 1.5 wt%

0.6 0.4 0.0 wt% 1.5 wt%

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0 0

2

4

6

8

0

10

2

4

6

Time (hours)

Time (hours)

12


8

10

Page 13 of 42

d 1.0

0.8

0.8

Normalized FF

c 1.0 Normalized Voc

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


0.6 0.4

0.0 wt% 1.5 wt%

0.2

0.6 0.4 0.0 wt% 1.5 wt%

0.2 0.0

0.0 0

2

4

6

8

0

10

2

4

6

8

10

Time (hours)

Time (hours)

Figure 9. Normalized stability with error lines of the PSCs with Eu-complex LDL (Eu-complex content: 0.0 wt%, 1.5 wt%, reverse scan from 1.2 to -0.1 V).

The PSC without Eu-complex LDL on reverse of FTO glass showed poor stability, and a loss of above 50% in efficiency was observed after 10 h (Figure 9a). Perovskite in PSCs are known to be sensitive to UV light, after prolonged absorption of UV light, the structure of perovskite could be destroyed, which causes the electron-hole recombination, leading to a decrease in charge collection efficiency. This process lowers the short-circuit photocurrent and the current values drop with time upon illumination which leads to a decrease in efficiency. The PSC with Eu-complex shows better photocurrent behavior than the PSC without Eu-complex. For the PSC with Eu-complex on the glass side, the Jsc value reduced by 3% after two hours of UV illumination, confirming there is almost no change in photocurrent. However, the Jsc value of PSC without Eu-complex drops to 90% of the initial value (Figure 9b). This indicates that the Eu-complex LDL has the ability to arrest the UV degradation effects and improve the stability of the PSC. The Jsc in PSC without Eu-complex degrades to 48% and that of PSC with Eu-complex to 74% of their respective initial values after 10 h. The open circuit voltages (Voc) of the two kinds of cells do not display a significant degradation (Figure 9c). The fill factor (FF) of the PSC with Eu-complex has a better performance than that of the PSC without Eu-complex during continuous UV illumination (Figure 9d), indicating the better crystallinity of perovskite in cells [37]. In addition, both of the PSCs without/with LDL show narrow distribution, indicating that the errors are small and the increase of PCE should come from the light conversion and UV blocking contributed by the LDL. In summary, the Eu-complex luminescent down-converting layer in the PSCs is responsible for the enhancement 13



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

of photocurrent density as well as the decrease of UV degradation.

4. Conclusion In conclusion, an effective approach to enhance the photovoltaic performance of PSC by the introduction of an Eu-complex transparent luminescent down-converting layer (LDL) is reported. The Eu-complex luminescent down-converting layer has a broad absorption in the UV region and the present results confirm that an Eu-complex transparent luminescent film on the glass side of the PSCs can improve its photovoltaic performance. By means of down-conversion technology, the spectral response range of PSC has been successfully extended to the UV region leading to a gain of photocurrent for active PSCs. The PSC coated with LDL of Eu-complex (1.5 wt% content) gets a PCE of 15.44%, which is 17.5% higher than that of PSC uncoated with Eu-complex LDL. The short-circuit current density (Jsc) of PSC shows extremely increase from 17.27 to 19.30 mA·cm2 due to the effective utilization of UV light. Moreover, the introduction of Eu-complex LDL in PSC could decrease the UV degradation by converting the UV light into visible light, so the stability of PSC is remarkably enhanced. Additionally, the open circuit voltage (Voc) is also increased slightly. Therefore, a down-converting material with an ideal absorption band, that availably absorbs short-wavelength UV light in the range of 300-380 nm and emits visible light which is well matched with the spectral response of PSC, would be a promising choice for enhancing the photoelectric performance and UV stability of PSCs. The results of our research might provide new avenues to improve the performance of PSCs.

AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Notes The authors declare no competing financial interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT 14


Page 14 of 42

Page 15 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


This work is supported by the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant No. 2015CB932200; the External Cooperation Program of BIC, Chinese Academy of Science (Grant No. GJHZ1607) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 21173227, U1205112).

Reference [1] Im, J. H.; Lee, C. R.; Lee, J. W.; Park, S. W.; Park, N. G. 6.5% Efficient Perovskite Quantum-Dot-Sensitized Solar Cell. Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 4088-4093. [2] Green, M. A.; Ho-Baillie, A.; Snaith, H. J. The Emergence of Perovskite Solar Cells. Nature Photonics, 2014, 8, 506-514. [3] Noh, J. H.; Sang, H. I.; Jin, H. H.; Mandal, T. N.; Sang, I. S. Chemical Management for Colorful, Efficient, and Stable Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Nanostructured Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1764-1769. [4] Etgar, L.; Gao, P.; Xue, Z.; Peng, Q.; Chandiran, A. K.; Liu, B.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Grätzel, M. Mesoscopic CH3NH3PbI3/TiO2 Heterojunction Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem.

Soc., 2012, 134, 17396-17399. [5] Wehrenfennig, C.; Eperon, G. E.; Johnston, M. B.; Snaith, H. J.; Herz, L. M. High Charge Carrier Mobilities and Lifetimes in Organolead Trihalide Perovskites. Adv.

Mater., 2014, 26, 1584−1589. [6] Beard M. C.; Luther J. M.; Nozik A. J. The Promise and Challenge of Nanostructured Solar Cells. Nature Nano., 2014, 9, 951–954. [7] Burschka, J.; Pellet, N.; Moon, S-J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Gao, P.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Grätzel, M. Sequential Deposition as a Route to High-Performance Perovskite-Sensitized Solar Cells. Nature, 2013, 499, 316−319. [8] Jeon, N. J.; Noh, J. H.; Kim, Y. C.; Yang, W. S.; Ryu, S.; Seok, S. I. Solvent Engineering for High-Performance Inorganic−Organic Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells.

Nat. Mater., 2014, 13, 897−903. [9] National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Best Research-Cell Efficiencies chart; www.nrel.gov/ncpv/images/efficiency_chart.jpg. [10] Ito, S.; Tanaka, S.; Manabe, K.; Nishino, H. Effects of Surface Blocking Layer of 15



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Sb2S3 on Nanocrystalline TiO2 for CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells, J. Phys. Chem. C,

2014, 118, 16995-17000． [11] Wang, J T.; Ball, J. M.; Barea, E. M.; Abate, A.; Alexander, J. A.; Huang, J.; Saliba, M.; Mora, I.; Bisquert, J.; Snaith, H. J.; Nicholas, R. J., Low-temperature processed electron collection layers of graphene/TiO2 nanocomposites in thin film perovskite solar cells, Nano Lett., 2014, 14, 724-730． [12] Qin, L.; Xie, Z.; Yao, L.; Yan, Y.; Pang, S.; Wei, F.; Qin, G. G. Enhancing the Efficiency of TiO2-Perovskite Heterojunction Solar Cell via Evaporating Cs2CO3 on TiO2, Phys. Status Solidi RRL, 2014, 8, 912-916. [13] Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6050-6051. [14] Kim, H. S.; Lee, C. R.; Im, J. H.; Lee, K. B.; Moehl, T.; Marchioro, A.; Moon, S. J.; Baker, R. H.; Yum, J. H.; Moser, J. E.; Grätzel, M.; Park, N. G. Lead Iodide Perovskite Sensitized All-Solid-State Submicron Thin Film Mesoscopic Solar Cell with Efficiency Exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep., 2012, 2, 591. [15] Lee, M. M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T. N.; Snaith, H. J. Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso-Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites,

Science, 2012, 338, 643-647. [16] Yamaguchi, S.; Tamao, K. Silole-Containing σ- and π-conjugated compounds. J.

Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans, 1998, 22, 3693-3702. [17] Lu, G.; Usta, H.; Risko, C.; Wang, L.; Facchetti, A.; Ratner, M. A.; Marks, T. J. Synthesis, Characterization, and Transistor Response of Semiconducting Silole Polymers with Substantial Hole Mobility and Air Stability Experiment and Theory. J.

Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 7670-7685. [18] Hou, J.; Chen, H. Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. Synthesis, Characterization, and Photovoltaic Properties of a Low Band Gap Polymer Based on Silole-Containing Polythiophenes and 2,1,3-Benzothiadiazole. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 16144-16145. [19] Leijtens, T.; Eperon, G. E.; Pathak, S.; Abate, A.; Lee, M. M.; Snaith, H. J. 16


Page 16 of 42

Page 17 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Overcoming Ultraviolet Light Instability of Sensitized TiO2 with Meso-Superstructured Organometal Tri-Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Nature Communications, 2013, 4, 2885. [20] Jin, J.; Chen, C.; Li, H.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, L.; Dong, B.; Song, H.; Dai, Q. Enhanced Performance and Photostability of Perovskite Solar Cells by Introduction of Fluorescent Carbon Dots. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 14518-14524. [21] Chen, C.; Li, H.; Jin, J.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, D.; Song, H.; Dai, Q. Highly Enhanced Long-Time Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells by Involving a Hdrophobic Hole Modification Layer. Nano Energy, 2017, 32, 165-173. [22] Strange, P.; Svane, A.; Temmerman, W. M.; Szotek, Z.; Winter, H. Understanding the Valency of Rare Earths from First-Principles Theory. Nature, 1999,

399, 756-758. [23] Auzel, F. Upconversion and Anti-Stokes Processes with f and d Ions in Solids.

Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 139-174. [24] Wu, G.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, B.; Xie, T.; Yuan, X. Synthesis of Eu2O3 Nanotube Arrays through a Facile Sol−Gel Template Approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 5976-5977. [25] Grätzel, M. The Light and Shade of Perovskite Solar Cells. Nat. Mater., 2014,

13, 838-842. [26] Chander, N.; Khan, A. F.; Chandrasekhar, P. S.; Thouti, E.; Swami, S. K.; Dutta, V.; Komarala, V. K. Reduced Ultraviolet Light Induced Degradation and Enhanced Light Harvesting Using YVO4:Eu3+ Down-Shifting Nano-Phosphor Layer in Organometal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2014, 105, 033904. [27] Hou, X.; Xuan, T.; Sun, H.; Chen, X.; Li, H.; Pan, L. High-Performance Perovskite Solar Cells by Incorporating a ZnGa2O4:Eu3+, Nanophosphor in the Mesoporous TiO2 layer. Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. Cells, 2016, 149, 121-127. [28] Chen, W.; Luo Q.; Zhang C.; Shi, J.; Deng, X.; Yue, L.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Huang, S. Effects of Down-Conversion CeO2:Eu3+ Nanophosphors in Perovskite Solar Cells. J.

Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron., 2017, 1-12. [29] Saif, M. Luminescence Based on Energy Transfer in Silica Doped with 17



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 42

Lanthanide Titania (Gd2Ti2O7:Ln3+) [Ln3+ = Eu3+ or Dy3+]. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A:

Chem., 2009, 205, 145-150. [30] Zimmermann, E.; Ehrenreich, P.; Pfadler, T.; Dorman, J. A.; Weickert J.; Schmidt, L. Erroneous Efficiency Reports Harm Organic Solar Cell Research. Nature Photon.

2014, 8, 669–672. [31] Snaith, H. J. The Perils of Solar Cell Efficiency Measurements. Nature Photon.

2012, 6, 337–340. [32] Shrotriya, V.; Li, G.; Yao, Y.; Moriarty, T.; Emery, K.; Yang, Y. Accurate Measurement and Characterization of Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 2016-2023. [33] Snaith, H. J. How Should You Measure Your Excitonic Solar Cells? J Energy

Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6513–6520. [34] Timmreck, R.; Meyer, T.; Gilot, J.; Seifert, H.; Mueller, T.; Furlan, A.; Wienk, M. M.; Wynands, D.; Hohl-Ebinger, J.; Warta, W.; Janssen, R. A. J.; Riede, M.; Leo, K. General Rules for Characterizing Tandem Organic Solar Cells. Nature Photon. 2015,

9, 478–479. [35] Huang, X. Y.; Han, S. Y.; Huang, W.; Liu, X. G. Enhancing Solar Cell Efficiency: the Search for Luminescent Materials as Spectral Converters. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013,

42, 173-201. [36] Huang, C. K.; Chen, Y. C.; Hung, W. B.; Chen, T. M.; Sun, K. W.; Chang, W. L. Enhanced Light Harvesting of Si Solar Cells via Luminescent Down-Shifting Using YVO4:Bi3+, Eu3+ nanophosphors. Prog. Photovoltaics, 2013, 21, 1507-1513. [37] Eperon, G. E.; Burlakov, V. M.; Docampo, P.; Goriely, A.; Snaith, H. J. Morphological

Control

for

High

Performance,

Solution-Processed

Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2014, 24, 151-157.

18


Planar

Page 19 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


TOC Graphic:

Software used to prepare the TOC graphic: Office 2010 and Photoshop CS5.

19



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 1. Schematic illustration for preparing Eu-complex luminescent down-converting layer (LDL). 15x2mm (300 x 300 DPI)


Page 20 of 42

Page 21 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)


Page 22 of 42

Page 23 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)


Page 24 of 42

Page 25 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


148x185mm (72 x 72 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

81x56mm (150 x 150 DPI)


Page 26 of 42

Page 27 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


80x58mm (150 x 150 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

82x58mm (150 x 150 DPI)


Page 28 of 42

Page 29 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


178x80mm (150 x 150 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

66x79mm (150 x 150 DPI)


Page 30 of 42

Page 31 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


66x51mm (96 x 96 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)


Page 32 of 42

Page 33 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)


Page 34 of 42

Page 35 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


149x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)


Page 36 of 42

Page 37 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)


Page 38 of 42

Page 39 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)


Page 40 of 42

Page 41 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

148x104mm (72 x 72 DPI)


Page 42 of 42

Enhancing photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cells by down

Recommend Documents