Subscriber access provided by UNIV MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON
Article
Establishing a leaf proteome reference map for Ginkgo biloba provides insight into potential ethnobotanical uses Lubica Uvackova, Emilia Ondruskova, Maksym Danchenko, Ludovit Skultety, Ján A. Miernyk, Pavel Hrubik, and Martin Hajduch J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/jf503375a • Publication Date (Web): 03 Nov 2014 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 8, 2014
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Title:
Establishing a leaf proteome reference map for Ginkgo biloba provides insight into potential ethnobotanical uses
2 3 4
Authors:
Lubica Uvackova1, Emilia Ondruskova2, Maksym Danchenko3, Ludovit Skultety3,4, Ján A. Miernyk5,6, Pavel Hrubík7, Martin Hajduch1,3
5 6 7 8
Affiliations:
1
Department of Reproduction and Developmental Biology, Institute of Plant
Genetics and Biotechnology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Nitra, Slovakia;
9 10
2
11
Academy of Sciences, Nitra, Slovakia; 3Institute of Virology, Slovak Academy
12
of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia; 4Institute of Microbiology, Academy of
13
Sciences of Czech republic, Prague, Czech Republic; 5USDA, Agricultural
14
Research Service, Plant Genetics Research Unit; 6Division of Biochemistry,
15
University of Missouri, Columbia, USA; 7Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape
16
Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Slovakia.
Department of Woody Plant Biology, Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak
17 18 19
Corresponding Author:
20
Martin Hajduch, Department of Reproduction and Developmental Biology,
21
Institute of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, Slovak Academy of Sciences,
22
Nitra, Slovakia; Telephone, 421-37-6943346; Fax, 421-37-7336660; E-mail,
23
[email protected] 24 25
Keywords:
Maidenhair tree, king cobra, medicinal tree, ornamental tree, 2-DE, protein map
26 27
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
28
Abstract
29
Although ginkgo (Maidenhair tree, Ginkgo biloba L.) is an ancient medicinal and ornamental
30
tree, there has not previously been any systematic proteomic study of the leaves. Herein we
31
describe results from the initial study identifying abundant ginkgo leaf proteins and present a
32
gel reference map. Proteins were isolated from fully developed mature leaves in biological
33
triplicate and analyzed by two-dimensional electrophoresis plus tandem mass spectrometry.
34
Using this approach we were able to reproducibly quantify 190 abundant protein spots, from
35
which 158 proteins were identified. Most of identified proteins are associated with the energy
36
and protein destination / storage categories. The reference map provides a basis for
37
understanding the accumulation of flavonoids and other phenolic compounds in mature
38
leaves (e.g., identification of chalcone synthase, the first committed enzyme in flavonoid
39
biosynthesis). We additionally detected several proteins of as yet unknown function. These
40
proteins comprise a pool of potential targets that might be useful in non-traditional medical
41
applications.
42 43
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 25
Page 3 of 25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
44
Introduction
45
Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.) or maidenhair tree is a “living fossil” among plants and is the only
46
surviving representative of the family Ginkgoaceae (1-3). Ginkgo is an important medicinal
47
and ornamental tree that is largely resistant to disease and pests (4) and inhabits diverse
48
environments. The nuts and the leaves of this tree contain a unique cohort of chemicals that
49
have been used for five thousand years in traditional Chinese medicine (5, 6), and ginkgo
50
remains a popular medicinal plant today. Leaf extracts contain secondary metabolites, such
51
as terpene trilactones (ginkgolides and bilobalide) and flavonol glycosides, that have been
52
suggested to improve memory. Furthermore, ginkgo leaf extracts have been used to
53
increase peripheral and cerebral blood flow (7), in the therapy of cognitive decline, and to
54
treat Alzheimer’s disease (8, 9). Finally, Ginkgo leaves have also been used in alternative
55
anticancer treatments (10, 11).
56
Proteomic analyses of trees are complicated by the lack of well-developed database
57
resources. Despite this, descriptions of several angiosperm leaf proteomes have been
58
published (12), including teak (Tectoma grandis; 13), spruce (Picea 14,15), poplar (Populus;
59
16, 17), and oak (Quercus; 18). Additionally, the analysis of gymnosperm “leaves” (Pinus
60
massoniana needles) led to the identification of 95 proteins, separated into eight functional
61
groups, that changed in abundance in response to calcium nutrition (19).
62
One of the few studies related to the ginkgo proteome provided new insights into the
63
process of ploidy in male gametes and the authors noted that colchicine treatment of
64
microsporocytes resulted in a low mutation rate of diploid male gametes (20). Another study
65
relevant to the ginkgo leaf proteome provides evidence that chloroplast senescence-related
66
proteins were regulated at the protein rather than the transcript level, helping to understand
67
senescence regulation in woody species (21). Herein, we describe results from the first
68
systematic investigation of the abundant ginkgo leaf proteins.
69
Material and Methods
70
Plant material
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
71
Fully mature leaves of a single male Maidenhair tree (Ginkgo biloba L.) growing in the City
72
Park, Nitra (Slovakia) were harvested from the ends of branches on a sunny morning, and
73
stored at -80°C until analyzed. For the analysis, 15 leaves were combined and homogenized
74
together, representing one biological replicate. In total, three biological replicates were
75
analyzed in this study.
76
Protein Extraction
77
Proteins were extracted using a method previously described (22). One gram fresh weight of
78
leaves was ground to a fine powder with a mortar and pestle containing liquid N2. Proteins
79
were extracted by shaking the leaf powder in a solution containing 50% (v/v) phenol, 0.45M
80
sucrose, 5mM EDTA, 0.2% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8 for 30 min
81
at 4°C. After centrifugation at 5000g for 10 min at 4°C the phenol phase was transferred to
82
clean tube and proteins were precipitated by adding 5 volumes of ice-cold 0.1M ammonium
83
bicarbonate (ABC) in methanol followed by overnight incubation at -20°C. After
84
centrifugation at 5,000 x g and 4°C for 10 min, protein pellets were washed twice with ice-
85
cold 0.1 M ammonium acetate in methanol, twice with ice-cold 80% acetone, and once in ice-
86
cold 70% ethanol.
87
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and “in-gel” digestion
88
Proteins were dissolved in rehydration sample buffer (8M urea, 2M thiourea, 2% (w/v)
89
CHAPS, 2% (w/v) Triton X-100, 50mM DTT, 0.5% ampholytes pH 3-10), and protein
90
concentrations were determined according to Bradford (23). Then, 50 µg of proteins were
91
analyzed by 2-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) using 7 cm immobilized pH gradient (IPG)
92
strips with pH range 5-8, as described earlier (24). Briefly, isoelectric focusing (IEF) was
93
performed using a Protean IEF Cell (Bio-Rad) programmed for active rehydration for 12
94
hours at 50 V followed by 150 V for 150 VH, 500 V for 500 VH, and 4000 V for 15000 VH.
95
After IEF, the IPG strips were equilibrated in 6 M urea containing 30% (v/v) glycerol, 70 mM
96
SDS, and 0.006% (w/v) bromphenol blue) for 15 min in equilibration solution with 1% (w/v)
97
DTT, then for an additional 15 min in equilibration solution containing 2.5% (w/v)
98
iodoacetamide. Equilibrated IPG strips were placed on top of 10% SDS-gels and 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 25
Page 5 of 25
99
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
electrophoretic separation was performed at 10mA per gel. Finally, triplicate gels were
100
stained with colloidal Coomassie blue, the images digitalized (GS-800, Bio-Rad, Hercules,
101
CA) at 300 dpi / 16 bit grayscale and quantified using PDQuest 8.0 software (Supplemental
102
Figure 1).
103
Protein spots present in at least in two of the triplicate gels were excised, de-stained
104
in wash solution (50% acetonitrile (ACN), 50mM ABC), and dehydrated in 100% ACN. The
105
dehydrated gel plugs were rehydrated in 50 mM ABC containing modified sequencing grade
106
trypsin (Promega), and digested at 37°C overnight. Tryptic peptides were extracted with
107
60% ACN containing 1% formic acid (FA). Solutions were reduced to dryness using a
108
Concentrator plus (Eppendorf, Germany). The tryptic peptides were dissolved in 2% ACN
109
containing 0.1% FA, and stored at -80ºC until used.
110
Protein identification by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
111
In total, 5 µL of tryptic peptides were separated using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters,
112
USA). Samples were injected onto a Symmetry C18 trap column (20 mm length, 180 µm
113
diameter, 5 µm particle size). After 3 min of desalting/concentration with 3% ACN containing
114
0.1% FA at a flow rate 10 µl·min-1, peptides were separated on an analytical BEH130 C18
115
column (150 mm length, 75 µm diameter, 1.7 µm particle size). For quick profiling, a 15 min
116
gradient of 6–40% ACN containing 0.1% FA at a flow rate of 350 nl·min-1 was applied. The
117
column outlet was connected to a precut non-coated PicoTip emitter (360 µm outer diameter,
118
20 µm inner diameter, 10 µm tip diameter; New Objective, USA); mounted into the nanospray
119
source of a Q-TOF Premier tandem mass spectrometer (Waters, USA). The instrument was
120
controlled by MassLynx software v. 4.1 (Waters, USA). Basic settings were: source
121
temperature, 70°C; nanospray voltage, 3.4 kV; nebulizer gas pressure, 0.4 bar; collision gas
122
flow, 0.48 ml·min-1. Data were acquired using the MSE method, which performed alternate
123
scans at low and high collision energies. The quadrupole analyzer was operated in the
124
radio-frequency mode, allowing all ions to reach the TOF analyzer, so that in a single full-
125
scan run both precursor ions and accurate fragment masses were detected. In the MS
126
channel, data were collected at a constant collision energy of 4 eV while in the tandem 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
127
(MS/MS) channel fragments were recorded while the collision energy was ramped up from
128
20 to 35 eV. Spectra acquisition scan rate was 0.8 s, with a 0.05 s inter-scan delay, ions
129
with 100-1900 m·z-1 were detected in both channels. The quadrupole mass profile settings
130
allowed efficient deflection of masses of less than 400 in the low energy mode enabling
131
filtering of contaminating ions.
132
Analysis of the MS/MS data
133
Peak smoothing was performed, including background-subtraction, centroiding, and
134
deisotoping. Noise filtering thresholds where set at: intensity, 1200; low energy, 150; high
135
energy, 20 counts. All data were lock-spray calibrated against Glu-Fibrinopeptide B, using
136
data collected from the reference line during acquisition (500 fmol·µl-1 in 25% ACN with 0.1%
137
FA, flow rate 350 nl·min-1, scans every 30 s). The lockmass-corrected data were
138
deconvoluted to produce a single accurate monoisotopic mass for each peptide and
139
associated fragment ions. Differently-charged precursors were summed. The initial
140
correlation of precursor and fragment ions was achieved by means of time alignment.
141
The MS/MS data were processed by the ProteinLynx Global Server (PLGS) v. 2.4
142
(Waters, USA) against an in-house database consisting of sequences downloaded from
143
UniProt during July 2013. In total, 742 Ginkgo species entries, 856,836 Spermatophyta
144
UniRef90 databank entries (taxonomy filter Spermatophyta and 90% sequence redundancy
145
grouping), and 1,573,198 Viridiplantae entries were included. The databank was randomized
146
to allow efficient correction for false-positive matches. The search parameters used were:
147
fixed modification, carbamidomethyl-Cys; variable modification, oxidized Met; one missed
148
cleavage site; at least 7 fragment ions per protein, and an automatic error tolerance value.
149
Protein identifications were accepted after manual inspection of probabilistic PLGS
150
assignment at the 95% confidence level. Additional parameters to accept protein
151
identification were; at least two peptides matched to the protein sequence, a minimum of
152
three fragment ions per peptide, a 50 ppm tolerance of database-generated theoretical
153
peptide ion masses, and a PLGS score greater than 50. The PLGS score is a statistical
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 25
Page 7 of 25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
154
measure of accuracy of assignation and was calculated using a Monte Carlo algorithm. A
155
higher score indicates a greater confidence in the assigned protein identity.
156
Results
157
Two-DE combined with MS/MS was used for analysis of the abundant gingko leaf proteins
158
(Fig 1). Using this approach we reliably quantified 190 abundant 2-DE spots (Supplemental
159
table 1); of which 158 were identified by MS/MS (Table 1). These data were used to
160
establish the initial ginkgo leaf proteome reference map (Fig. 2). As expected, the most
161
abundant 2-DE spots were identified as ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase
162
(RuBisCO) subunits (spots 5502, 6509, 4504, 6501, and 5501). The next most abundant
163
proteins were ATP synthase (spot 1506), RuBisCO activase (spot 2304), and the Class III
164
homeodomain leucine-zipper protein C3HDZ3 (spot 2401) (Fig. 2). The 2-DE spots with the
165
lowest abundance values that contained an identifiable protein were spot 2708 (ginancin),
166
followed by spot 8401 (alanine aminotransferase), spot 5105 (superoxide dismutase), and
167
spot 6307 (protein similar to glycerate dehydrogenase/hyrdoxypyruvate reductase.
168
Most of the identified ginkgo leaf proteins were assigned to the energy group
169
Identified proteins presented on the reference map were assigned to one of 10 functional
170
groups (Fig. 3) according to Bevan et al. (25). Only one primary function was assigned per
171
protein. Most of the identified proteins were associated with the energy group (61). Within
172
this group, 24 2-DE spots were identified as subunits of RuBisCO. In total, 10 2-DE spots
173
were identified as ATP synthase subunits (Table 1), 4 spots were identified as
174
fructosebisphosphate aldolase, and another 4 as phosphoglycerate-kinase.
175
The second most populated category is proteins associated with destination/storage
176
(31). Within this group, 14 2-DE spots were identified as Ginnacin, the 11S ginkgo seed
177
storage protein (26). Four 2-DE spots were identified as subunits of the ATP dependent Clp
178
protease (Table 1). A total of 16 proteins associated with disease/defense comprise the third
179
largest functional group (Table 1). Five 2-DE spots contained proteins associated with
180
abscisic acid stress and ripening (ASR) (27). The fourth largest functional group was
181
proteins of unknown function (PUF; 15). 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
182
The relative volumes of all proteins within a particular functional class were summed
183
in order to determine the most abundant functional group (Supplemental Figure 2). Proteins
184
associated with energy contributed more than 70% to total protein abundance, followed by
185
those associated with destination / storage, and disease / defense. The fourth most
186
abundant functional group was proteins associated with transcription, followed by PUF
187
(Supplemental Figure 2).
188
An abundant protein of unknown function is similar to nucleolar protein 58 of the king
189
cobra
190
We detected 15 proteins of unknown function (PUF). These proteins were subjected to
191
BLASTP searches in order to reveal similarity with known proteins (Supplemental table 2).
192
The most abundant protein in this group was Os01g0217100 (spots 1201, 3403, and 7301)
193
with UniProt accession number Q5QNF4 (Table 1). The NCBI Blast search revealed that the
194
amino acid sequence of this unknown protein is 53% similar to the amino acid sequence of a
195
purine permease from Foxtail millet (Setaria italica) (Supplemental table 2). Unexpectedly,
196
the second most abundant PUF was a putative uncharacterized protein (G7KFS4, spot 1501)
197
that has the closest similarity (56%) to nucleolar protein 58 from the king cobra
198
(Ophiophagus hannah) (Supplemental table 2). Third most abundant PUF was
199
uncharacterized protein with UniProt accession M0TUE2 (Table 1). A BLAST search failed
200
to reveal similarity to any known protein (Supplemental table 2).
201
Discussion
202
The aim of this study was to use 2-DE based proteomics approach to establish a reference
203
map of most abundant ginkgo leaf proteins. The application of a proteomics strategy for the
204
characterization of medicinal plants is not new (e.g., studies of Catharanthus roseus (28),
205
Pinellia ternata (29), Podophyllum hexandrum (30), and Indian ginseng (31)). The previous
206
analyses yielded meaningful results, such as in the case of Gynura procumbens where the
207
92 characterized proteins from leaves included miraculin, a taste-masking agent with high
208
commercial value (32).
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 25
Page 9 of 25
209
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
The majority of the proteins presented on the reference map (Fig. 2) are involved with
210
photosynthesis and energy metabolism. The abundance of many of these proteins in leaf
211
proteomes has been noted previously (e.g., teak (13), Indian ginseng (31), Gynura
212
procumbens (32), barrel medic (33), tomato (34), holm oak (18), and Miscanthum sinensis
213
(35)). In the present study we detected multiple spots containing subunits of RuBisCO (spots
214
5502, 6509, 4504, 6501, and 5501), the enzyme that catalyzes the first step of carbon
215
fixation in Calvin cycle, and the most abundant protein in the Ginkgo leaf proteome.
216
Chloroplastidial ATP synthase, which generates ATP using a proton gradient, was
217
represented by 10 2-DE spots on the reference map and was the second most abundant leaf
218
protein (Fig. 2). Half of the ATP synthase spots were identified as the α−subunit, and the
219
other five as the β−subunit (Table 1).
220
Glycolytic enzymes are well represented on the 2-DE reference map. Four spots
221
were identified as fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (FBA), which catalyzes the aldol cleavage
222
of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone-
223
phosphate. Another three 2-DE spots (6407, 6403, 7302) were identified as glyceraldehyde
224
3 phosphate dehydrogenase, which catalyzes the conversion of glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate
225
to D-glycerate-1,3-bisphosphate. Two 2-DE spots (5302, 6305) were identified as the Krebs
226
cycle enzyme NAD-malate dehydrogenase.
227
Several stress-related proteins are present on the 2-DE map, including ascorbate
228
peroxidase (APX, spots 5204 and 6104) and superoxide dismutase (SOD, spots 3101, 5105
229
and 7105). The APX reaction is part of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle for protection against
230
oxidative stress. It uses two molecules of ascorbate to reduce H2O2 to water (36). The SOD
231
reaction is also involved with H2O2 detoxification (37).
232
Proteins associated with secondary metabolism and proteins of unknown function are
233
abundant in the ginkgo leaf proteome
234
Many of the spots on the reference map correspond to enzymes involved in secondary
235
metabolism. Secondary metabolites are valuable targets for industrial applications (38, 39).
236
It is known that Ginkgo´s leaves contain biologically active terpenes and a range of flavonoid 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
237
glycosides (40). More than 38 leaf flavonoids have been isolated so far (41). Elaboration of
238
the flavone core structure yields structurally related compounds with diverse functions (42,
239
43). In the present study we detected 5 proteins associated with flavonoid metabolism;
240
caffeoy-CoA O-methyltransferase (spot 1206), cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (spot 303),
241
anthocyanidin reductase (spot 4306), an isoflavone reductase-like protein (spot 6204), and
242
chalcone synthase (spot 6405). Chalcone synthase catalyzes the first committed step in
243
flavonoid biosynthesis (44), producing chalcone from which all other flavonoids are derived.
244
Anthocyanidin reductase (spot 4306) converts anthocyanidins to their corresponding 2,3-cis-
245
flavan-3-ols, and is responsible for formation of epicatechin and epigallocatechin in
246
Arabidopsis and Medicago (45). Flavonoids comprise a diverse group of polyphenolic
247
compounds with neuroprotective properties in models of Alzheimer's disease, stroke, and
248
Parkinson's disease (46). Isoflavone reductase reduces achiral isoflavones to chiral
249
isoflavanones in Ginkgo (47). Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR) and caffeoyl-CoA O-
250
methyltransferase (CCoAOMT) are enzymes active in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. The
251
CCR-catalyzed reaction is the first step of the lignin-specific branch of the phenylpropanoid
252
pathway and is a key enzyme responsible for quality and quantity of lignin (48-50).
253
Proteins with unknown function (PUF) are fifth most abundant functional group on
254
established map of ginkgo leaf proteome (Fig. 2). Most abundant PUF was Os01g0217100
255
protein from rice (spot s1201, 3403, and 7301) with UniProt accession number Q5QNF4
256
(Table 1). Using the BLAST algorithm to search the NCBI databases revealed that the amino
257
acid sequence of this protein is 77% similar to rice amino acid transporter-like protein
258
(Supplemental table 2). The nucleotide sequence for this protein was described during the
259
sequencing of rice genome (51).
260
The second most abundant PUF was a putative uncharacterized protein (G7KFS4)
261
that is for 56% similar to nucleolar protein 58 characterized from the blood of the king cobra
262
(Ophiophagus hannah) (52) (Supplemental table 2). Third most abundant PUF protein was
263
uncharacterized protein (spot 5101, M0TUE2). This protein showed similarity only to other
264
unknown proteins (Supplemental table 2). Additionally, this study quantified 10 other 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 25
Page 11 of 25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
265
unknown proteins from ginkgo leaves (Table 1). It should be noted that unknown proteins
266
constitute more than half of the proteins in plant genomes (53). The characterization of
267
unknown proteins is one of the greatest challenges of post-genomics biology, and should
268
lead to a broader understanding of metabolic processes. The ginkgo leaf PUF’s constitute a
269
pool of targets related to traditional medicine-related applications (Fig. 4).
270
Conclusions
271
A quantitative proteomics approach to analysis of the ginkgo leaf proteome led to detection
272
of several proteins associated with secondary metabolism (Fig. 4). Additionally, we also
273
detected 15 proteins of unknown function that constitute pool of potential targets for
274
ethnobotanical applications (Fig. 4). Follow-up studies will be required to further characterize
275
the ginkgo leaf PUF’s and their potential contributions to the health benefits alluded to for
276
centuries in traditional Chinese medicine.
277
Acknowledgements
278
This research was partially funded by the European Community under project number
279
26220220180: Building Research Centre „AgroBioTech" and by the Research &
280
Development Operational Program funded by the ERDF - Centre of Excellence for White-
281
Green Biotechnology (ITMS 26220120054).
282 283
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
284
Figure legends
285
Figure 1. The experimental workflow. Proteins were isolated from ginkgo leaves using a
286
phenol-based extraction method and separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Protein
287
spots were quantified using the PDQuest software. Excised spots were digested with
288
trypsin, separated by nanoAcquity UPLC, and analyzed by MS/MS in the MSE mode.
289
Proteins were identified using ProteinLynx Global Server.
290
Figure 2. Map positions of 158 proteins extracted from Ginkgo biloba leaves. This
291
quantitative reference map was established using 7 cm IPG strips (pI 5-8), PDQuest software
292
(version 8.0), and Q-TOF Premier mass spectrometer.
293
Figure 3. Functional classification of 158 proteins identified from Ginkgo biloba leaves,
294
based upon the method of Bevan et al. (25).
295
Figure 4. Quantitative analysis of proteins associated with synthesis of phenolic and
296
flavonoids compounds with ethnobotanical applications. This approach was also applied to
297
analysis of proteins of unknown function (PUF) that are potential targets for further analysis
298
and with potential use in non-traditional medical applications.
299 300
Supplemental material
301
Supplemental Figure 1. Two-DE gels of the Ginkgo leaf proteome, presented in biological
302
triplicate.
303
Supplemental Figure 2. The summed relative volumes (%V) for all proteins assigned to
304
each functional group.
305
Supplemental Table 1. Relative volumes (%V) of all quantified 2-DE spots presented on 7
306
cm 2-DE gels of pH 5-8.
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 25
Page 13 of 25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
307
Supplemental Table 2. The results of BLASTP queries of Proteins of Unknown Functions
308
(PUF) against NCBInr protein database, sorted by percent identity (Max ident). The top
309
three matches are shown.
310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 14 of 25
326
Table 1. Proteins located on the Ginkgo biloba leaf reference map. The table includes 2-DE
327
spot number, UniProt accession number; description / name, observed MW (kDa) / pI,
328
deduced MW (kDa) / pI, PLGS (Protein Lynx Global Server) score, number of peptides
329
matched to protein sequence, and relative volume of 2-DE spot ± SD (%V±STDEV) of
330
biological triplicate analyses (Supplemental table 1).
331
Spot No. UniProt Description 01 Metabolism 01.01 Amino Acids 3409 H8YHW0 Adenosylmethionine synthetase 3401 H8YHW0 Adenosylmethionine synthetase 3406 H8YHW0 Adenosylmethionine synthetase 8401 Q1M301 Alanine aminotransferase 7209 A9NUJ0 Aspartate aminotransferase 4402 M4CBV6 Glutamine synthetase 6307 I1NWA3 Glycerate dehydrogenase 6704 Q2YHN6 Methionine synthase 4703 B0ZQ27 Phenylalanine ammonia lyase 01.03 Nucleotides 4303 B9T0A9 Adenosine kinase putative 01.05 Sugars and polysaccharides 2504 B8LNV7 Glucose 1 phosphate adenylyltransferase 4201 B9T2C3 UDP glucosyltransferase putative 01.06 Lipid and sterol 5701 H9A985 Acetyl coenzyme A 7801 H9A985 Acetyl coenzyme A 02 Energy 02.01 Glycolysis 4409 I1KTX8 Phosphoglycerate kinase 3413 O24330 Phosphoglycerate kinase 4403 I1KTX8 Phosphoglycerate kinase 5307 M7ZR60 Phosphoglycerate kinase 02.02 Gluconeogenesis 6305 G3BMW0 Malate dehydrogenase 5302 O48906 Malate dehydrogenase 02.07 Pentose phosphate 7102 A9NP17 Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase 2303 C4PAW8 Sedoheptulose 1 7 bisphosphatase 5703 A5AS94 Transketolase 5702 I1H1V5 Transketolase 02.01 Glycolysis 7202 A9NUC9 Fructose bisphosphate aldolase 6303 Q8LK59 Fructose bisphosphate aldolase 6316 I3SDW4 Fructose bisphosphate aldolase 6310 B9SJY9 Fructose bisphosphate aldolase 6403 B9TQJ4 Glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase 6407 P12859 Glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase B 7302 P09315 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase A 2206 A9NRN6 Triosephosphate isomerase
Exp. Theoret. MW/pI MW/pI (kDa) (kDa)
PLGS Score
Pep %V±STDEV
45/6.24 49/6.03 47/6.22 50/7.82 23/7.38 40/6.42 40/7.1 105/7.1 84/6.63
16/6.04 16/6.04 16/6.04 21/5.19 48/6.99 39/7.91 44/6.37 18/5.83 79/5.91
143.12 1575.12 1147.95 445.85 421.16 325.49 499.95 461.24 59.79
2 3 6 2 5 2 6 6 2
0.28±0.06 0.10±0.02 0.10±0.09 0.01±0.00 0.23±0.11 0.28±0.02 0.03±0.03 0.16±0.06 0.42±0.28
37/6.5
38/4.99
221.05
3
0.06±0.04
55/5.8 29/6.3
58/5.94 54/5.68
230.2 68.26
9 2
0.10±0.01 0.07±0.02
90/6.8 36/6.9 110/7.5 36/6.9
58.46 134.48
3 3
0.20±0.08 0.13±0.02
44/6.6 41/6.28 46/6.4 43/6.6
50/8.73 24/6.53 50/8.73 49/5.26
2168.39 84.99 869.69 730.62
12 3 8 5
0.46±0.18 0.28±0.08 0.19±0.08 0.17±0.11
32/7.1 84/6.6
35/9.22 43/7.99
2004.64 512.49
6 8
0.18±0.02 0.10±0.01
15/7.5 39/5.7 91/6.9 80/6.8
31/7.93 42/5.89 74/6.37 80/5.9
594,00 4 257.02 10 220.84 4 130.77 3
0.09±0.06 0.41±0.06 0.22±0.12 0.09±0.00
29/7.65 35/7.08 30/6.9 28/7.32 41/7.12 41/7.4 35/7.6 19/5.63
43/8.07 34/9.53 43/8.2 43/8.58 21/5.64 48/7.53 44/8.26 27/4.82
2368.93 267.41 135.71 228.15 866.6 4794.78 799.35 1349.52
1.14±0.33 0.18±0.09 0.09±0.02 0.07±0.05 0.35±0.05 0.43±0.21 0.41±0.06 0.06±0.04
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
10 4 3 4 3 19 9 5
Page 15 of 25
332
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
02.13 Respiration 602 I6N9D1 ATP synthase subunit alpha 1605 Q4FGJ3 ATP synthase subunit alpha 1611 I6N9D1 ATP synthase subunit alpha 2618 H7CG64 ATP synthase subunit alpha 1609 Q4FGJ3 ATP synthase subunit alpha 1507 Q9MRI7 ATP synthase subunit beta 1506 H9A983 ATP synthase subunit beta 1607 H9A983 ATP synthase subunit beta 2601 Q9MRI7 ATP synthase subunit beta 2603 Q9MRI7 ATP synthase subunit beta 02.30 Photosynthesis 7203 D8QZW2 Carbonic anhydrase 5201 A9NNY0 Carbonic anhydrase 2304 F8UAA7 Chloroplast rubisco activase 7804 G4XWZ6 Glycine decarboxylase complex subunit P 1204 Q39768 LHCB 1110 Q39768 LHCB 2211 O49079 Oxygen evolving enhancer protein 1 3211 O49079 Oxygen evolving enhancer protein 1 3404 B1PIE1 RuBisCo oxygenase activase alpha 2 2307 B1PIE1 RuBisCo oxygenase activase alpha 2 8502 I6N9F4 RuBisCo large chain 5303 I2AP09 RuBisCo large chain 6601 P48704 RuBisCo large chain 3501 I2AP09 RuBisCo large chain 5706 P48704 RuBisCo large chain 5912 E7E875 RuBisCo large chain 3818 P48704 RuBisCo large chain 5502 I6N9F4 RuBisCo large chain 6509 I2AP09 RuBisCo large chain 4504 I6N9F4 RuBisCo large chain 5501 I6N9F4 RuBisCo large chain 4605 I6N9F4 RuBisCo large chain 6814 M8A2T1 RuBisCo large chain 2616 K9LMB1 RuBisCo large chain 6501 J7QBH1 RuBisCo large chain 6506 E7E875 RuBisCo large chain 4602 H8YV26 RuBisCo large chain 6508 H8YV26 RuBisCo large chain 5907 H8YV26 RuBisCo large chain 7505 O98722 RuBisCo large subunit 604 P21239 RuBisCO large subunit binding protein 2403 B1PIE1 RuBisCo oxygenase activase alpha 2 2402 A9UHW7 RuBisCo oxygenase activase small isoform 03 Cell growth/division 7803 C0L3G8 Mother of FT and TFL1 like protein 04 Transcription 1108 K9LNQ8 DNA directed RNA polymerase 6706 D4P3L6 Ndly protein 04.1901 General TFs 2401 Q20BK8 Class III homeodomain leucine zipper protein 6810 A8HQJ4 Global transcription factor 6807 K4CPZ3 Transcription factor KAN2 807 A1IKZ7 Transcription factor Tbx4 Fragment 04.1904 Specific TFs 2404 D7THU3 Agamous-like MADS-box protein AGL15-like 05 Protein synthesis 05.01 Ribosomal proteins 3804 K9LMH5 50S ribosomal protein L14 05.04 Translation factors 8501 H1ZY27 Putative elongation factor 1 alpha 6813 Q1HPA9 Elongation factor 2 6803 O23755 Elongation factor 2 7703 P86349 Elongation factor G
54/5.05 63/5.13 67/5.36 66/5.21 63/5.32 50/5.38 60/5.36 58/5.23 60/5.48 62/5.6
56/4.83 55/4.82 56/4.83 56/4.82 55/4.82 50/4.72 52/4.88 52/4.88 50/4.72 50/4.72
635.21 11218.78 192.64 1317.53 3390.77 286.72 21867.13 19197.38 4631.8 399.81
10 24 9 17 19 3 57 46 25 6
0.34±0.24 0.72±0.37 0.45±0.12 0.38±0.25 0.32±0.17 0.47±0.26 2.53±1.21 0.65±0.15 0.40±0.14 0.07±0.05
18/7.73 22/7.12 23/6.75 30/6.42 39/5.93 48/6.01 110/7.58 30/6.86 17/5.31 29/5.1 16/5.34 29/5.1 26/5.78 35/6.24 23/6.12 35/6.24 41/6.11 16/8.58 39/5.57 16/8.58 55/7.8 53/6.3 41/6.8 53/5.97 70/7.02 49/6.29 50/6.15 53/5.97 83/6.74 49/6.29 250/6.9 20/6.94 102/6.25 49/6.29 55/6.8 53/6.3 55/6.9 53/5.97 57/6.63 53/6.3 58/6.7 53/6.3 58/6.55 53/6.3 180/6.83 46/5.71 66/5.21 53/5.98 57/7.07 22/5.4 54/7.35 20/6.94 57/6.47 25/5.72 58/7.42 25/5.72 250/6.83 25/5.72 55/7.58 53/6.42 67/5.05 58/4.64 42/5.56 16/8.58 45/5.56 48/8.18
366.27 135.46 1256.55 282.38 13220.84 2232.48 1100.02 2461.32 858.56 337.19 307.84 417.05 5734.4 709.25 219.14 1207.35 139.9 6709.48 12104.97 2349.38 5352.14 1590.2 240.85 70.41 12207.37 3631.08 1666.18 1357.03 962.31 253.89 134.75 606.05 458.21
2 2 9 5 8 3 8 11 2 2 10 8 4 11 6 4 4 40 87 28 31 12 6 3 12 6 10 3 6 8 3 2 9
0.29±0.08 0.17±0.05 2.09±1.26 0.26±0.01 0.27±0.04 0.27±0.15 0.82±0.12 0.22±0.05 0.24±0.06 0.19±0.10 0.07±0.08 0.12±0.08 0.10±0.06 0.10±0.05 0.08±0.06 0.05±0.03 0.03±0.02 26.91±2.63 10.49±2.79 7.80±2.98 3.66±3.72 1.02±0.12 0.29±0.24 0.24±0.04 5.45±3.69 0.43±0.21 0.41±0.38 0.27±0.23 0.15±0.06 0.30±0.07 0.34±0.10 0.29±0.06 0.08±0.05
110/7.5 24/10.1
259.96
3
0.22±0.02
13/5.2 90/7.2
78/9.66 47/9.01
77.05 83.36
2 3
0.14±0.10 0.29±0.11
50/5.5 110/7.4 115/7.3 133/5.0
92/5.86 126/4.97 16/6.76 17/9.37
71.69 86.4 137.04 74.11
6 4 2 2
1.93±0.99 0.11±0.01 0.12±0.04 0.14±0.04
48/5.7
21/9.5
185.27
5
0.13±0.09
103/6.1 14/9.39
199.07
5
0.11±0.09
53/7.8 18/6.61 110/7.00 9/9.41 110/7.08 94/5.88 90/7.9 12/5.69
291.32 318.95 200.78 595.6
2 2 11 3
0.20±0.11 0.16±0.05 0.14±0.05 0.04±0.01
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
333
06 Protein destination and storage 06.01 Folding and stability 1702 M0VTF2 70 kDa heat shock protein 2602 A7Y7L7 GloEL protein chaperonin 60kDa 3705 M1B4C8 Heat shock cognate 70 kDa 1706 P27322 Heat shock cognate 70 kDa protein 2 1705 J3NEA8 Heat shock protein 70 3704 D8RBE2 Heat shock protein 70 2707 A2XF47 Heat shock protein 70 06.13 Proteolysis 3809 P84565 ATP dependent Clp protease 3807 P84565 ATP dependent Clp protease 3810 P84565 ATP dependent Clp protease 3803 P84565 ATP dependent Clp protease 2706 O82150 ATP dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH 4301 I1LZJ2 CAAX prenyl protease 2 7807 I1MXB2 Glycine dehydrogenase [decarboxylating] 8801 O49954 Glycine dehydrogenase decarboxylating 06.20 Storage proteins 6707 Q8LPD3 Conlinin n 1 2405 Q39772 Ginnacin 2406 Q39772 Ginnacin 1202 Q39772 Ginnacin 6302 Q39772 Ginnacin 1214 Q39772 Ginnacin 6309 Q39772 Ginnacin 3701 Q39772 Ginnacin 2506 Q39772 Ginnacin 2407 Q39772 Ginnacin 2502 Q39772 Ginnacin 7601 Q39772 Ginnacin 3706 Q39772 Ginnacin 2802 Q39772 Ginnacin 2708 Q39772 Ginnacin 2704 B7U6L4 Globulin 3 10 Signal transduction 01 Receptors 2715 G7I4I2 Pheromone receptor like protein 11 Disease/defense 2208 Q6S9Z8 ASR protein 2204 Q6S9Z8 ASR protein 2416 Q6S9Z8 ASR protein 2209 Q6S9Z8 ASR protein 2302 Q6S9Z8 ASR protein 11.05 Stress (and defence) responses 5204 B8YNY1 Ascorbate peroxidase 6104 B8YNY1 Ascorbate peroxidase 3101 B8YNX9 Superoxide dismutase 7105 A6N9I6 Superoxide dismutase 5105 B8YNX9 Superoxide dismutase 11.06 Detoxification 4305 Q01908 ATP synthase gamma chain 1 4309 Q01908 ATP synthase gamma chain 1 4401 A0MQ80 Monodehydroascorbate reductase 1113 G7II43 NAD P H quinone oxidoreductase 3305 F6GY60 Peroxidase 12-like 1107 H6VND7 Peroxiredoxin 2
Page 16 of 25
85/5.01 67/5.5 82/6.2 86/5.44 86/5.4 82/6.2 87/6.0
62/9.45 18/10.53 63/4.85 71/4.88 71/7.9 72/4.98 45/4.93
539.93 1436.29 105.64 1701.94 1145.28 83.65 111.68
9 5 4 13 14 4 5
0.50±0.15 0.26±0.11 0.14±0.05 0.34±0.11 0.32±0.25 0.11±0.03 0.08±0.06
103/6.3 98/6.1 97/6.3 104/6.1 79/6.0 36/6.4 110/7.6 110/7.9
8/4.17 8/4.17 8/4.17 8/4.17 77/5.65 38/8.54 114/7.05 113/6.53
696.96 743.91 1181.43 274.81 370.31 96.2 589.17 124.33
3 3 4 2 12 2 10 7
0.19±0.04 0.19±0.05 0.09±0.06 0.09±0.04 0.16±0.03 0.26±0.03 0.12±0.13 0.08±0.05
75/7.3 42/5.8 46/5.8 25/5.1 32/7.1 18/5.0 37/7.2 73/6.1 50/5.9 47/5.9 49/5.7 57/7.5 74/6.24 103/6.0 77/6.0 81/5.8
19/7.49 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 51/8.0 66/7.76
3504.32 95.72 65.8 93.6 93.06 134.23 95.07 92.51 70.87 75.19 63.87 50.7 66.55 88.29 88.29 138.55
2 3 7 4 4 5 4 5 6 4 4 3 5 4 4 6
0.03±0.01 0.69±0.18 0.50±0.06 0.40±0.24 0.35±0.05 0.35±0.34 0.24±0.17 0.10±0.09 0.16±0.03 0.15±0.09 0.15±0.04 0.12±0.05 0.16±0.03 0.04±0.03 0.01±0.01 0.08±0.03
72/5.9
34/10.0
52.99
3
0.12±0.02
25/5.6 25/5.5 42/5.9 24/5.6 33/5.5
20/5.2 20/5.2 20/5.2 20/5.2 20/5.2
5891.91 3348.01 92.3 1910.87 97.93
8 2 2 3 2
0.70±0.42 0.61±0.07 0.52±0.52 0.41±0.36 0.11±0.01
18/6.8 17/6.8 14/6.2 14/7.5 14/6.4
27/5.8 27/5.8 27/6.9 26/9.3 27/6.9
3561.47 2035.51 260.77 293.49 1243.84
16 13 4 4 6
0.20±0.03 0.06±0.05 0.28±0.13 0.08±0.09 0.03±0.02
36/6.5 33/6.5 47/6.3 15/5.1 49/6.1 13/5.1
41/8.1 41/8.1 47/5.2 30/9.4 36/5.4 30/7.1
354.9 145.2 248.68 74.35 720.67 1543.6
2 2 5 2 2 6
0.24±0.03 0.22±0.10 0.06±0.03 0.30±0.39 0.14±0.02 0.10±0.08
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 25
334
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
12 Protein of unknown function (PUF) 8010 M5XFL4 Chloro diff and palisade dev-related protein 4103 E4MXM1 mRNA clone RTFL01 39 N23 1201 Q5QNF4 Os01g0217100 protein 3403 Q5QNF4 Os01g0217100 protein 7301 Q5QNF4 Os01g0217100 protein 6804 B9I1Z7 Predicted protein 2803 A9PIA4 Predicted protein n 1501 G7KFS4 Putative uncharacterized protein 5101 M0TUE2 Uncharacterized protein 6702 M4ECD1 Uncharacterized protein 915 M0U8E4 Uncharacterized protein 6701 M4EFH1 Uncharacterized protein 4601 M5WLX4 Uncharacterized protein 2605 K3XJ71 Uncharacterized protein 3408 M1CP73 Zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 11 20 Secondary metabolism 20.1 Phenylpropanoids/phenolics 1206 K7YEU4 Caffeoyl CoA O methyltransferase 303 G3EKI9 Cinnamoyl CoA reductase 20.07 Flavonoids 4306 Q5XLY0 Anthocyanidin reductase 6405 Q6RIB2 Chalcone synthase 6204 M1T9X3 Isoflavone reductase like protein 20.99 Others 5401 I1NIQ0 GDP-mannose 3,5-epimerase 2210 F6H9A9 Thiamine thiazole synthase 1 chloroplastic
9/7.7 17/6.6 23/5.1 43/6.0 42/7.6 110/7.2 110/6.0 55/5.1 14/6.7 105/7.0 250/5.0 85/7.0 62/6.4 70/5.8 40/6.2
30/9.4 50/5.7 19/10.2 19/10.2 19/10.2 26/9.0 24/7.5 19/10.2 44/6.4 41/4.9 17/9.4 15/5.0 72/5.2 39/12.1 48/6.8
1213.14 154.17 422.25 607.16 693.39 76.7 445.74 147.34 84.73 104.43 183.62 347.02 44.04 150.54 131.11
2 2 2 2 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4
0.05±0.05 0.13±0.11 0.35±0.41 0.27±0.02 0.06±0.05 0.06±0.04 0.11±0.04 0.31±0.24 0.19±0.09 0.15±0.05 0.15±0.06 0.11±0.01 0.09±0.04 0.07±0.01 0.21±0.21
21/5.4 36/5.1
29/5.5 36/7.1
537.88 57.26
4 2
0.19±0.03 0.51±0.15
36/6.6 41/7.3 28/7.4
37/5.5 43/6.3 33/6.2
1405.2 174.41 445.65
8 6 5
0.12±0.03 0.28±0.14 0.20±0.16
49/6.7 27/5.7
31/5.6 37/5.7
1077.03 690.37
10 6
0.12±0.05 0.19±0.01
335
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
336
References
337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385
1. Chen, L. Q.; Li, C. S.; Chaloner, W. G.; Beerling, D. J.; Sun, Q. G.; Collinson, M. E.; Mitchell, P. L., Assessing the potential for the stomatal characters of extant and fossil Ginkgo leaves to signal atmospheric CO2 change. American Journal of Botany 2001, 88, 1309-1315. 2. McKenna, D. J.; Jones, K.; Hughes, K., Efficacy, safety, and use of ginkgo biloba in clinical and preclinical applications. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 2001, 7, 70-+. 3. Tremouillaux-Guiller, J.; Rohr, T.; Rohr, R.; Huss, V. A. R., Discovery of an endophytic alga in Ginkgo biloba. American Journal of Botany 2002, 89, 727-733. 4. Major, R. T., The ginkgo, the most ancient living tree. The resistance of Ginkgo biloba L. to pests accounts in part for the longevity of this species. Science (New York, N.Y.) 1967, 157, 1270-3. 5. DeFeudis, F. V.; Drieu, K., Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761) and CNS functions: Basic studies and clinical applications. Current Drug Targets 2000, 1, 25-58. 6. Glisson, J.; Crawford, R.; Street, S., The clinical applications of Ginkgo biloba, St. John's wort, saw palmetto, and soy. The Nurse practitioner 1999, 24, 35-6. 7. Smith, J. V.; Luo, Y., Studies on molecular mechanisms of Ginkgo biloba extract. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2004, 64, 465-472. 8. Mazza, M.; Capuano, A.; Bria, P.; Mazza, S., Ginkgo biloba and donepezil: a comparison in the treatment of Alzheimer's dementia in a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. European Journal of Neurology 2006, 13, 981-985. 9. Ude, C.; Schubert-Zsilavecz, M.; Wurglics, M., Ginkgo biloba Extracts: A Review of the Pharmacokinetics of the Active Ingredients. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2013, 52, 727-749. 10. Sparreboom, A.; Cox, M. C.; Acharya, M. R.; Figg, W. D., Herbal remedies in the United States: Potential adverse interactions with anticancer agents. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004, 22, 24892503. 11. Sagar, S. M.; Yance, D.; Wong, R. K., Natural health products that inhibit angiogenesis: a potential source for investigational new agents to treat cancer-Part 2. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) 2006, 13, 99-107. 12. Abril, N.; Gion, J.-M.; Kerner, R.; Mueller-Starck, G.; Navarro Cerrillo, R. M.; Plomion, C.; Renaut, J.; Valledor, L.; Jorrin-Novo, J. V., Proteomics research on forest trees, the most recalcitrant and orphan plant species. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1219-1242. 13. Quiala, E.; Jesus Canal, M.; Rodriguez, R.; Yaguee, N.; Chavez, M.; Barbon, R.; Valledor, L., Proteomic profiling of Tectona grandis L. leaf. Proteomics 2012, 12, 1039-1044. 14. Valledor, L.; Castillejo, M. A.; Lenz, C.; Rodriguez, R.; Canal, M. J.; Jorrin, J., Proteomic analysis of Pinus radiata needles: 2-DE map and protein identification by LC/MS/MS and substitution-tolerant database searching. Journal of Proteome Research 2008, 7, 2616-2631. 15. Valledor, L.; Jorrin, J. V.; Luis Rodriguez, J.; Lenz, C.; Meijon, M.; Rodriguez, R.; Jesus Canal, M., Combined Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Differentially Expressed Pathways Associated to Pinus radiata Needle Maturation. Journal of Proteome Research 2010, 9, 3954-3979. 16. Renaut, J.; Lutts, S.; Hoffmann, L.; Hausman, J. F., Responses of poplar to chilling temperatures: Proteomic and physiological aspects. Plant Biology 2004, 6, 81-90. 17. Yuan, K.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Wang, M.; Huang, M., Identification of differentially expressed proteins in poplar leaves induced by Marssonina brunnea f. sp Multigermtubi. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 2008, 35, 49-60. 18. Valero-Galvan, J.; Gonzalez-Fernandez, R.; Ma Navarro-Cerrillo, R.; Gil-Pelegrin, E.; JorrinNovo, J. V., Physiological and Proteomic Analyses of Drought Stress Response in Holm Oak Provenances. Journal of Proteome Research 2013, 12, 5110-5123. 19. Hu, W.-J.; Chen, J.; Liu, T.-W.; Wu, Q.; Wang, W.-H.; Liu, X.; Shen, Z.-J.; Simon, M.; Chen, J.; Wu, F.-H.; Pei, Z.-M.; Zheng, H.-L., Proteome and calcium-related gene expression in Pinus massoniana needles in response to acid rain under different calcium levels. Plant and Soil 2014, 380, 285-303. 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 25
Page 19 of 25
386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
20. Yang, N.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Long, C.; Li, Y.; Li, Y., Proteomic Analysis of the Low Mutation Rate of Diploid Male Gametes Induced by Colchicine in Ginkgo biloba L. Plos One 2013, 8. 21. Wei, X.-D.; Shi, D.-W.; Chen, G.-X., Physiological, structural, and proteomic analysis of chloroplasts during natural senescence of Ginkgo leaves. Plant Growth Regulation 2013, 69, 191-201. 22. Hajduch, M.; Ganapathy, A.; Stein, J. W.; Thelen, J. J., A systematic proteomic study of seed filling in soybean. Establishment of high-resolution two-dimensional reference maps, expression profiles, and an interactive proteome database. Plant Physiology 2005, 137, 1397-1419. 23. Bradford, M. M., A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry 1976, 72, 248-54. 24. Takac, T.; Pechan, T.; Richter, H.; Mueller, J.; Eck, C.; Boehm, N.; Obert, B.; Ren, H.; Niehaus, K.; Samaj, J., Proteomics on Brefeldin A-Treated Arabidopsis Roots Reveals Profilin 2 as a New Protein Involved in the Cross-Talk between Vesicular Trafficking and the Actin Cytoskeleton. Journal of Proteome Research 2011, 10, 488-501. 25. Bevan, M.; Bancroft, I.; Bent, E.; Love, K.; Goodman, H.; Dean, C.; Bergkamp, R.; Dirkse, W.; Van Staveren, M.; Stiekema, W.; Drost, L.; Ridley, P.; Hudson, S. A.; Patel, K.; Murphy, G.; Piffanelli, P.; Wedler, H.; Wedler, E.; Wambutt, R.; Weitzenegger, T.; Pohl, T. M.; Terryn, N.; Gielen, J.; Villarroel, R.; De Clerck, R.; Van Montagu, M.; Lecharny, A.; Auborg, S.; Gy, I.; Kreis, M.; Lao, N.; Kavanagh, T.; Hempel, S.; Kotter, P.; Entian, K. D.; Rieger, M.; Schaeffer, M.; Funk, B.; Mueller-Auer, S.; Silvey, M.; James, R.; Montfort, A.; Pons, A.; Puigdomenech, P.; Douka, A.; Voukelatou, E.; Milioni, D.; Hatzopoulos, P.; Piravandi, E.; Obermaier, B.; Hilbert, H.; Dusterhoft, A.; Moores, T.; Jones, J. D. G.; Eneva, T.; Palme, K.; Benes, V.; Rechman, S.; Ansorge, W.; Cooke, R.; Berger, C.; Delseny, M.; Voet, M.; Volckaert, G.; Mewes, H. W.; Klosterman, S.; Schueller, C.; Chalwatzis, N.; Project, E. U. A. G., Analysis of 1.9 Mb of contiguous sequence from chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 1998, 391, 485-488. 26. Arahira, M.; Fukazawa, C., GINKGO 11S SEED STORAGE PROTEIN FAMILY MESSENGER-RNA UNUSUAL ASN-ASN LINKAGE AS POSTTRANSLATIONAL CLEAVAGE SITE. Plant Molecular Biology 1994, 25, 597-605. 27. Shen, G.; Pang, Y. Z.; Wu, W. S.; Deng, Z. X.; Liu, X. F.; Lin, J.; Zhao, L. X.; Sun, X. F.; Tang, K. X., Molecular cloning, characterization and expression of a novel Asr gene from Ginkgo biloba. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2005, 43, 836-843. 28. Jacobs, D. I.; Gaspari, M.; van der Greef, J.; van der Heijden, R.; Verpoorte, R., Proteome analysis of the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus. Planta 2005, 221, 690-704. 29. Wu, X.; Xiong, E.; An, S.; Gong, F.; Wang, W., Sequential Extraction Results in Improved Proteome Profiling of Medicinal Plant Pinellia ternata Tubers, Which Contain Large Amounts of HighAbundance Proteins. Plos One 2012, 7. 30. Dogra, V.; Ahuja, P. S.; Sreenivasulu, Y., Change in protein content during seed germination of a high altitude plant Podophyllum hexandrum Royle. Journal of Proteomics 2013, 78, 26-38. 31. Dhar, R. S.; Gupta, S. B.; Singh, P. P.; Razdan, S.; Bhat, W. W.; Rana, S.; Lattoo, S. K.; Khan, S., Identification and characterization of protein composition in Withania somnifera-an Indian ginseng. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2012, 21, 77-87. 32. Hew, C.-S.; Gam, L.-H., Proteome Analysis of Abundant Proteins Extracted from the Leaf of Gynura procumbens (Lour.) Merr. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2011, 165, 1577-1586. 33. Watson, B. S.; Asirvatham, V. S.; Wang, L. J.; Sumner, L. W., Mapping the proteome of barrel medic (Medicago truncatula). Plant Physiology 2003, 131, 1104-1123. 34. Guo, B.; He, W.; Wu, D.; Che, D.; Fan, P.; Xu, L.; Wei, Y., Proteomic Analysis of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum var. cerasifarm) Expressing the HBsAg Gene by 2-dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 2013, 68, 424-429. 35. Sharmin, S. A.; Alam, I.; Rahman, M. A.; Kim, K.-H.; Kim, Y.-G.; Lee, B.-H., Mapping the leaf proteome of Miscanthus sinensis and its application to the identification of heat-responsive proteins. Planta 2013, 238, 459-474. 36. Noctor, G.; Foyer, C. H., Ascorbate and glutathione: Keeping active oxygen under control. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 1998, 49, 249-279. 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485
37. Kosova, K.; Vitamvas, P.; Prasil, I. T.; Renaut, J., Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress Contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. Journal of Proteomics 2011, 74, 1301-1322. 38. Jacobs, D. I.; van der Heijden, R.; Verpoorte, R., Proteomics in plant biotechnology and secondary metabolism research. Phytochemical Analysis 2000, 11, 277-287. 39. Verpoorte, R.; Contin, A.; Memelink, J., Biotechnology for the production of plant secondary metabolites. Phytochemistry Reviews 2002, 1, 13-25. 40. Vanbeek, T. A.; Scheeren, H. A.; Rantio, T.; Melger, W. C.; Lelyveld, G. P., DETERMINATION OF GINKGOLIDES AND BILOBALIDE IN GINKGO-BILOBA LEAVES AND PHYTOPHARMACEUTICALS. Journal of Chromatography 1991, 543, 375-387. 41. van Beek, T. A.; Montoro, P., Chemical analysis and quality control of Ginkgo biloba leaves, extracts, and phytopharmaceuticals. Journal of Chromatography A 2009, 1216, 2002-2032. 42. Winkel-Shirley, B., Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiology 2001, 126, 485-493. 43. Dixon, R. A.; Xie, D. Y.; Sharma, S. B., Proanthocyanidins - a final frontier in flavonoid research? New Phytologist 2005, 165, 9-28. 44. Tohge, T.; Yonekura-Sakakibara, K.; Niida, R.; Watanabe-Takahashi, A.; Saito, K., Phytochemical genomics in Arabidopsis thaliana: A case study for functional identification of flavonoid biosynthesis genes. Pure and Applied Chemistry 2007, 79, 811-823. 45. Xie, D. Y.; Sharma, S. B.; Paiva, N. L.; Ferreira, D.; Dixon, R. A., Role of anthocyanidin reductase, encoded by BANYULS in plant flavonoid biosynthesis. Science 2003, 299, 396-399. 46. Spencer, J. P. E., The interactions of flavonoids within neuronal signalling pathways. Genes and Nutrition 2007, 2, 257-273. 47. Hua, C.; Linling, L.; Feng, X.; Yan, W.; Honghui, Y.; Conghua, W.; Shaobing, W.; Zhiqin, L.; Juan, H.; Yuping, W.; Shuiyuan, C.; Fuliang, C., Expression patterns of an isoflavone reductase-like gene and its possible roles in secondary metabolism in Ginkgo biloba. Plant cell reports 2013, 32, 637-50. 48. Zhou, R.; Jackson, L.; Shadle, G.; Nakashima, J.; Temple, S.; Chen, F.; Dixon, R. A., Distinct cinnamoyl CoA reductases involved in parallel routes to lignin in Medicago truncatula. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107, 17803-17808. 49. Zhong, R. Q.; Morrison, W. H.; Himmelsbach, D. S.; Poole, F. L.; Ye, Z. H., Essential role of caffeoyl coenzyme A O-methyltransferase in lignin biosynthesis in woody poplar plants. Plant Physiology 2000, 124, 563-577. 50. Martz, F.; Maury, S.; Pincon, G.; Legrand, M., cDNA cloning, substrate specificity and expression study of tobacco caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase, a lignin biosynthetic enzyme. Plant Molecular Biology 1998, 36, 427-437. 51. International Rice Genome Sequencing, P., The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 2005, 436, 793-800. 52. Vonk, F. J.; Casewell, N. R.; Henkel, C. V.; Heimberg, A. M.; Jansen, H. J.; McCleary, R. J. R.; Kerkkamp, H. M. E.; Vos, R. A.; Guerreiro, I.; Calvete, J. J.; Wuester, W.; Woods, A. E.; Logan, J. M.; Harrison, R. A.; Castoe, T. A.; de Koning, A. P. J.; Pollock, D. D.; Yandell, M.; Calderon, D.; Renjifo, C.; Currier, R. B.; Salgado, D.; Pla, D.; Sanz, L.; Hyder, A. S.; Ribeiro, J. M. C.; Arntzen, J. W.; van den Thillart, G. E. E. J. M.; Boetzer, M.; Pirovano, W.; Dirks, R. P.; Spaink, H. P.; Duboule, D.; McGlinn, E.; Kini, R. M.; Richardson, M. K., The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2013, 110, 20651-20656. 53. Hanson, A. D.; Pribat, A.; Waller, J. C.; de Crecy-Lagard, V., 'Unknown' proteins and 'orphan' enzymes: the missing half of the engineering parts list - and how to find it. Biochemical Journal 2010, 425, 1-11.
486
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 25
Page 21 of 25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
190x254mm (96 x 96 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
254x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 25
Page 23 of 25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
254x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
254x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 25
Page 25 of 25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
254x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment