Europium (II), Vanadium (II), and Dithionite

1984, Volume 23. Carl W. Dirk and Tobin J. Marks*: Cofacial Assembly of Partially ... J. Marks. S. Arif Kazmi, A. Lee Shorter, and JamesV. ... is 0.10...
0 downloads 0 Views 60KB Size
Additions and Corrections

2870 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 24, No. 18. 1985

Additions and Corrections 1984, Volume 23

Carl W. Dirk and Tobin J. Marks*: Cofacial Assembly of Partially Oxidized Metallomacrocycles as an Approach to Controlling Lattice Architecture in Low-Dimensional Molecular Solids. Synthesis and Properties of Cofacially Joined Silicon and Germanium Hemiporphyrazine Polymers. Page 4327. A draftman's error appears in the first equation of Scheme I. The correct version of the scheme is as follows:

Scheme I

-Tobin

I. Marks

S. Arif Kazmi, A. Lee Shorter, and James V. McArdle*: Kinetics of Reduction of Ferrichrome and Ferrichrome A by Chromium( 11), Europium(II), Vanadium(II), and Dithionite. Page 4334. The headings of the columns of Table I, part b, were omitted and should read as follows: column 1, pH; column 2, T, O C ; column 3, 10-3k0, M-' s-I ; column 4, pH; column 5 , T , OC; column 6, 10-3ko,M-l s-'. Note the different factors for k , in parts a and b of this table.-James V. McArdle

1985, Volume 24

J. M. Newsam* and T. R. Halbert: Steric Effects in [CpMoS(p-S)12 Dimers Studied by Interactive Molecular Graphics. Pages 491-494. Recent modeling of related [LMoO(p-O)], complexes indicates that distortions additional to the flexing about S2-S3 considered in the present work can occur in accommodating different ligands or conformations. The effect of these additional modes on the steric constraints and further discussion of the estimated experimental errors of the present methodology will be presented in subsequent reports.-J. M. Newsam and T. R. Halbert.

Khurram Zahir, Wolthardt Bottcher, and Albert Haim*: EnergyTransfer Quenching of Excited States of Polypyridine Complexes of Ruthenium(I1) by Hexaamminecobalt(II1) or Tris(ethy1enediamine)cobalt(III). Page 1967. In footnote a of Table I the value of the ionic strength is given incorrectly. The correct value is 0.10,-Albert Haim