Facile Preparation of Dual-Shell Novel Covalent–Organic Framework

Mar 5, 2019 - All Publications/Website .... College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University , Kexue Avenue 100, Zhengzhou , Henan...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Washington University | Libraries

Food and Beverage Chemistry/Biochemistry

Facile preparation of dual-shell novel COFs functionalized magnetic nanospheres and used for the simultaneous determination of fourteen trace Heterocyclic aromatic amines in nonsmokers and smokers of cigarettes with different tar yields based on UPLC-MS/MS Wenfen Zhang, Lan Chen, Huimin Zhang, Yanhao Zhang, Wenjing Zhang, Wuduo Zhao, Connor Johnson, Kai Hu, Fuwei Xie, and Shusheng Zhang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06372 • Publication Date (Web): 05 Mar 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 6, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Facile preparation of dual-shell novel COFs functionalized magnetic nanospheres and used for the simultaneous determination of fourteen trace Heterocyclic aromatic amines in nonsmokers and smokers of cigarettes with different tar yields based on UPLC-MS/MS *a

Wenfen Zhang,a,b Chen Lan,a Huimin Zhang,a Yanhao Zhang,c Wenjing Zhang, * Kai Hu,f Fuwei Xie,g Shusheng Zhang, a, d

Wuduo Zhao,d Connor Johnson,e

a College

of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Kexue Avenue 100, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, P. R. China. b Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA State c Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, 999077 d Center of Advanced Analysis and Computational Science, Key Laboratory of Molecular Sensing and Harmful Substances Detection Technology, Zhengzhou University, Kexue Avenue 100, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, P. R. China. e Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA f Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, 450008, P.R. China g Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute of CNTC, Fengyang Avenue, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, P. R. China.

18 19 20 21 22

Declarations of interest: none

23 24

*Corresponding authors at:

25

Zhengzhou University, 100 Kexue Avenue, Hi-tech District, Zhengzhou 450001, P.R. China, Email:

26

[email protected], Telephone number: +8613513801442, Fax: +860 371 67763224, (Shusheng

27

Zhang).

28

Zhengzhou University, 100 Kexue Avenue, Hi-tech District, Zhengzhou 450001, P.R. China, Email:

29

[email protected] , Telephone number: +8618625775683, Fax: +86 0371 67763224, (Wenjing

30

Zhang).

31 32 33 34 35 36 37

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

38

Abstract

39

The facile preparation, characterization and application of novel dual-shell TpBD (a kind of COFs)

40

coated magnetic nanospheres (TpBD) as sorbents for simple, fast and high selectivity capture of

41

fourteen heterocyclic aromatic amines are reported. Quantum chemistry theory calculation was

42

conducted to directly and quantifiably describe the multiple interactions, including π- π, hydrogen

43

bonding, cation- π, static electricity and ion-exchange, between TpBD and heterocyclic aromatic

44

amines. The excellent adsorption capacity of TpBD coated magnetic nanospheres was further

45

evaluated by extraction of fourteen HAAs from non-smokers’ and smokers’ urine samples. Under

46

the optimized conditions, the magnetic solid phase extraction process can be completed with high

47

recovery range from 95.4% to 129.3%. After being washed with acetonitrile and water

48

successively, the collected sorbents can be easily recycled and reused for five times without any

49

significant difference in performance. Coupled with the ultra performance liquid chromatography-

50

tandem mass spectrometer detection, the exposure level of HAAs in non-smokers and smokers

51

smoking cigarettes with different tar yields were successfully explored. And it implied that the

52

robust method based on the versatile TpBD coated dual-shell magnetic nanospheres sorbents

53

represent a great potential application in the analysis of disease markers and body fluids.

54

Keywords: Magnetic nanospheres, Heterocyclic aromatic amines, Urine, Tar yields

55

1. Introduction

56

Heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) are the pyrolysis products of proteins and amino acids,

57

which can be found in many kinds of coffee, fried food, environmental waters, smokers’ urines.

58

Up to now, about thirty heterocyclic amines (HAs) have been found and several of them have been

59

identified as animal carcinogens1–8. These procarcinogens are metabolically activated by N-

60

hydroxylation of the exocyclic amino group, resulting in the formation of intermediates that are 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 31

Page 3 of 31

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

61

toxic and critical metabolites to DNA damage. On a daily basis, people maybe frequently exposed

62

to the cigarette smoke, and faced with the healthy risk from HAs. In 1962, Poindexter and

63

Carpenter first reported the existence of two HAs (carbolines and β- carbolines) in cigarette smoke.

64

In 1998, D Hoffmann and I Hoffmann reported eight HAAs, which were produced by the process

65

of combustion or dissociation of nitrogen- and oxygen- containing compounds when the cigarette

66

burned. Among these HAs, the HAAs released from the main smoking are very low, but their

67

biological toxicity is relatively high9,10. Thus, it is necessary to develop a sensitive and specific

68

method for analyzing HAAs during the risk assessment of HAA exposure.

69

Currently the analysis of trace HAAs in bio-fluids (urine and blood) poses challenges due to the

70

existence of the matrix interferences. Sample pretreatment is always required prior to analysis of

71

HAAs in real samples. For example, solid phase extraction (SPE)

72

(LLE)12,13, micro-SPE14, liquid membrane extraction15, tandem solvent SPE16, microwave-assisted

73

solvent extraction17, alone or in combination with one or more purification steps, were developed

74

by many laboratories. Most of those pretreatments are time-consuming, labor-intensive or have

75

limited diffusion and low mass transfer rates. Therefore, it is important to design an effective

76

pretreatment method for the concentration of HAAs from complex urine samples. Magnetic SPE

77

(MSPE), a promising modification of SPE, has attracted considerable attention and is considered

78

as an excellent alternative to traditional SPE on account of its limited diffusion resistance, high

79

surface area and facile surface modification. At the same time, the magnetic adsorbent can be easily

80

recycled using an external magnetic field, eliminating the need for additional centrifugation or

81

filtration of the sample, then greatly simplifying the SPE procedure.

82

Recently, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) based on Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@SiO2 are most widely used

83

in many application fields, such as in food safety, environmental, and biomedical analysis18–21.

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

10,11

, liquid-liquid extraction

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

84

Their suitable functionalized coating on MNPs are very significant to avoid the aggregation of the

85

Fe3O4 MNPs, which can also greatly be influenced by their extraction capacity and selectivity to

86

the targets. For examples, covalent-organic frameworks (COFs) with excellent thermal stability,

87

high porosity, high specific surface area, and low density22–24, replacing the coordination bonds in

88

metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), have demonstrated the special advantages in molecular

89

adsorption and separation science25–27. However, how to obtain uniform and stable MNPs

90

adsorbents with higher bonding amount and less agglomeration still remain the significant

91

challenge.

92

Banerjee designed and synthesized a series of COFs 28, and some of them (TpPa-1 and TpBD)

93

were successfully used for the separation and concentration of various targets29,30. Among them,

94

TpBD exhibits a unique porous structural framework, large conjugate system and multiple

95

recognition sites, including aromatic rings (hydrophobic interaction and π-π interaction), a

96

macrocyclic cavity (inclusion interaction), and partially protonated bridged nitrogen atoms (anion

97

exchange interaction), which is more easily to interact with positively charged HAAs containing

98

at least one heterocyclic ring, as well as at least one electron donating group amine (nitrogen-

99

containing) group or methyl group (Fig. S1) to form π–π, cation-π complexes31. Herein, we try

100

using Fe3O4 and SiO2 as the core and the link layer and using chemically stable amorphous COFs

101

(TpBD) as the adsorptive shell to construct porous dual-shell nanospheres (TpBD-DS MNS). It is

102

expected that TpBD-DS MNS can be applied to effectively extract HAAs from the urine samples.

103

In this work, a novel magnetic sorbent with good dispersibility, high bonding amount and stability

104

were prepared and used to extract and purify fourteen trace HAAs from smoker urine samples.

105

And an accurate and reproducible ultra performance liquid chromatography- tandem mass

106

spectrometer (UPLC-MS/MS) method based on TpBD-DS MNS was developed and used for the

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 31

Page 5 of 31

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

107

sensitive determination of trace HAAs in smokers’ urine samples. Based on the analysis results,

108

the exposure level of HAAs in non-smokers and smokers smoking cigarettes with different tar

109

yields were evaluated.

110

2. Experimental

111

2.1Material and instruments.

112

Material. Iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), ethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol,

113

citric acid, acetic acid, sodium acetate (NaAc), toluene, dichloromethane, ammonium hydroxide,

114

1,4-dioxane, hydrochloric acid (HCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), ethanol, acetone, and diatomite

115

were all of analytical grade and provided by Henan Chemical Reagents Company (Henan, China).

116

1,3,5-triformylphloroglucinol (TFP), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), benzidine (BD), and 3-

117

aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) were obtained from Sigma. A Milli-Q gradient ultrapure

118

water system (Millipore, USA) was used to generate ultrapure water. HPLC-grade methanol,

119

acetonitrile, formic acid were purchased from J.T. Baker (Phillips-burg, NJ, USA). Creatinine Plus

120

kit purchased from the company of Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN, USA). amino-

121

dipyrido[1,2-a: 3', 2'-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2), 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (Harman), 2-

122

amino-1,6-dimethylimidazo[4,5-b]-pyridine (DMIP), 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (Norharman), 2-

123

amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAαC), 2-amino-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (AαC), 2-

124

amino-1,3-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f] quinoline (IQ), 2-amino-3,4-dimethyl-3H-imidazoquinoline

125

(MeIQ), 2-amino-3,8-dimethyl Triazolyl Quinoxaline (MeIQx), 2-Amino-3-methyl- Imidazo [4,5-

126

f] quinoxaline (IQx), amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), 3-amino-1-

127

methylpyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2), 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[3,4-b] (Trp-P-1), amino-

128

6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a: 3', 2'-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1), and all the internal standard (TriMeIQx,

129

PhIP-D3, AαC-15N3, Norharman-D7, MeAαC-D3) were provided by Toronto Research Chemicals 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

130

Inc. (North York, ON, Canada).

131

Urine samples. All the smoker urine samples were obtained from the Zhengzhou Tobacco

132

Research Institute of China National Tobacco Corporation (CNTC), comprising 20 non-smokers

133

and 60 smokers (20 smoke high-level tar cigarettes, 20 smoke middle-level tar cigarettes, 20 smoke

134

low-level tar cigarettes). The tar level was determined by the bands of the cigarettes, and this

135

information was provided by Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Center. The smokers usually smoked

136

10–20 cigarettes per day. All volunteers were banned from eating cooked food for 2 days before

137

the sample collection. Then, urine sample of each volunteer was collected over 24 h and stored at

138

-40◦C until the analysis. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou

139

University, and informed consent was obtained from every subject. Non-smokers are college

140

students from Zhengzhou University.

141

Instrumentals. A Nicolet 6700 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, USA) was used to record the

142

Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and EDS

143

analysis were recorded by an S-4300 SEM instrument configured with an Energy Dispersive

144

Spectrometer system (Zeiss/Auriga FIB, Germany). An ARL X′TRA diffractometer with Cu Kα

145

radiation (ARL, Lausanne, Switzerland) was used to collect the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra.

146

Transmission electron microscopic (TEM) images were collected from a TalosF200S TEM

147

instrument (Thermo Fisher, U.S.A.). The magnetization curves were obtained at RT on a Magnetic

148

Property Measurement System called MPMS3 (LDJ Electronics, USA). An Autosorb-1 MP gas

149

adsorption instrument (Quantachrome, USA) was used to perform the nitrogen sorption analysis.

150

2.2 UPLC-MS/MS analysis.

151

The UPLC-MS/MS analysis was conducted on an LC-30AD LC equipped with a QTRAP 6500

152

Triple Quad mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, USA). An Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 column (4.6 mm 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 31

Page 7 of 31

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

153

× 100 mm, 1.8 μm) was selected as the separation column, and a good separation was achieved at

154

40℃. The flow rate and sample injection volume were 300 μL/min and 5 μL, respectively. The

155

mobile phase consisted of 0.1% acetic acid solution (A) and acetonitrile (B). The gradient elution

156

was carried out under the following conditions: 0-2 min, 5% B; 30 min, 30% B; 31-35 min, 100%

157

B; post time, 7 min.

158

The optimal mass spectrometer parameters: detection mode, multiple reaction monitoring (MRM);

159

ionization mode, ESI+; dry gas (N2) temperature, 550◦C; Ion Spray Voltage, 5500 V; GS1 (N2)

160

GS2 (N2), Curtain gas(N2) Voltage were 45, 50 and 30 psi respectively; The value of Collision Cell

161

Exit Potential and Entrance Potential were 11 V and 10 V, respectively. The optimized parameters

162

of all the HAAs in MRM analysis mode we listed in table 1.

163

Matrix effect: The standard stock solution of HAAs was stepwise diluted with pure solvent or

164

purified urine matrix to prepare a series of standard working solutions (1 ng/mL, 0.5 ng/mL, 0.25

165

ng/mL, 0.05 ng/mL, 0.005 ng/mL). After being added with internal standard, they were analyzed

166

under the optimal HPLC-MS/MS condition in quintuplicate. The slope values for standard curves

167

prepared in purified urine matrix and pure solvent was compared to evaluate the matrix effect.

168

2.3 Preparation of TpBD-DS MNS

169

Synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetic nanospheres. A solvothermal method was used to synthesize the

170

Fe3O4 nanoparticles according to a modified published method32. Briefly, FeCl3·6H2O (1.35 g, 5

171

mmol) was added to ethylene glycol (50 mL), and the mixture was stirred ultrasonically to make

172

the solution clear. Then NaAc (3.6 g) and polyethylene glycol (1.0 g) were added and the mixture

173

was stirred vigorously for 30 min. After that, the mixture was transferred to a Teflon-lined

174

stainless-steel autoclave (100 mL capacity), and heated at 200 ℃ for 12 h. The dark products were

175

isolated with an external magnetic field, and then washed four times with H2O and ethanol prior 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

176

to use.

177

Synthesis of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNS. Fe3O4 (2 g wet weight) was dispersed into 0.5 M citric acid

178

solution (200 ml). The mixture was stirred mechanically for 12 h at 40 °C and ultrasonicated for

179

10 min. The products were separated and washed several times with deionized H2O and ethanol

180

alternately. The product obtained was dispersed in aqueous ethanol (ethanol : H2O = 4:1, v/v, 160

181

mL), NH4OH (4 ml) was added with sonication. Finally, TEOS (2 mL) was added with mechanical

182

stirring at 45 °C. After stirring for 12 h, the products were isolated and washed twice with ethanol

183

and acetone, and then with deionized H2O and dried in vacuo at 40 °C for 12 h.

184

Synthesis of Fe3O4@SiO2-NH2 MNS. Fe3O4@SiO2 nanospheres (2.0 g) were dispersed in 120 ml

185

of freshly distilled anhydrous toluene and sonicated for 20 min. Then APTES (4 mL) was slowly

186

added dropwise with mechanical stirring under N2. The mixture was heated continuously at 115 ℃

187

for 12 h with stirring. The product was extracted using a magnet and washed with toluene, acetone,

188

highly deionized H2O, and ethanol and then dried in vacuo at 40 °C for 12 h.

189

Preparation of Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD dual-shell MNS (TpBD-DS MNS) adsorbent

190

First, 1.53 g of Fe3O4@SiO2-NH2 MNS, 0.115 g of 1,3,5-triformylphloroglucinol (Tp) and 5mL

191

3M acetic acid were added into a 250 mL round bottom pressure-resistant flask. Then, 20mL of

192

anhydrous 1,4-dioxane and 1,3,5- trimethylbenzene (v:v=1:1) was added to the above solution.

193

The mixture was ultrasonicated for 10 min, and then flash frozen at 77 K (liquid N2 bath) and

194

degassed by a vacuum pump. Then the flask was sealed off and heated for 12h at 120 °C to form

195

the monomer (Tp) functional Fe3O4@SiO2. Then, after 0.115 g 1,3,5-triformylphloroglucinol and

196

0.17 g benzidine were added, the mixture was re-heated at 120 °C for 3d under a vacuum. Finally,

197

the product was collected by applying a magnet, and the obtained TpBD-DS MNS adsorbent was

198

washed several times with toluene, 1,4-dioxane solution, methanol, acetone, water and ethanol to 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 31

Page 9 of 31

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

199

completely remove the excess reactants. The washed magnetic sorbent was dried at 60℃ under a

200

vacuum for 12 h prior to use.

201

2.4 Computational Details

202

The structures of HAAs and TpBD were firstly optimized by using the density functional theory

203

(DFT)33,34 at the B3LYP/6-31G (d, p) level of theory. Then the molecular docking study was

204

conducted to help get the rational initial guesses of the complexes of various HAAs and TpBD. In

205

particular, the optimized HAAs molecules were docked into the optimized TpBD molecule by

206

using the AutoDock Vina program. The grid map consists of 100 × 80 × 80 points with a spacing

207

of 1.0. Choosing the best scoring representative conformation as the initial structure for each

208

complex, which was further optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G (d, p) level. All geometry

209

optimizations were performed using the Gaussian 09 suit of program, and the harmonic frequency

210

calculations were carried out at the same level of theory to help verify that all structures have no

211

imaginary frequency. Given the optimized structures of complexes, the non-covalent interaction

212

(NCI) analysis was performed using the Multiwfn (version 3.5) program, and the isosurface plotted

213

using the VMD (version 1.9.3) program.

214

2.5 MSPE procedure

215

The urine was first thawed at room temperature before the MSPE. And then simple agitation and

216

hydrolysis were then performed according to the previous report with a little modification12. 100

217

μL HCl solution (12 mol/L) was mixed with 2 mL urine sample and heated at 70◦C for 3 h. After

218

cooling, adjust the pH of the urine to 7 with 10 mol/L NaOH. Then the mixture was transferred

219

into a 100 mL beaker containing 10 mg TpBD-DS MNS adsorbent. After that, 5 μL of mixed

220

internal standard (TriMeIQx, MeAαC-D3, AαC-15N3, Norharman-D7, and PhIP-D3) solution (100

221

ng/mL) was added and the mixture was sonicated for 1.0 min. Then, the TpBD-DS MNSs were 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

222

isolated from the mixture using an external magnet. The supernatant was discarded. The TpBD-

223

DS MNS was first washed with 2 mL water, and then sonicated in 4 mL acetonitrile containing

224

300 μL 0.1% sodium hydroxide solution for 1 min to desorb the analytes. The desorption solution

225

was collected into a 10 mL centrifuge tube and evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen gas

226

at 40 ℃. The obtained residue was redissolved in 500 μL methanol. Finally, filter the solution

227

using a 0.22 μm nylon filter (Agilent, USA) prior to UPLC-MS/MS.

228

Recovery Test. Recovery investigation was used to validate the developed extraction method. The

229

test samples were spiked at three concentration levels (10, 100 and 1000 pg/mL) by adding

230

standard solution of each HAA to non-smoker urine samples. The samples were then extracted and

231

analyzed as previously described. Each concentration level was conducted three replicate

232

measurements. The recovery of each HAA was calculated using the equation (Cb- Ca)/Cs, where

233

Cs is the spiked concentration, and Ca and Cb are the measured concentrations before and after the

234

addition of the standard solution.

235

Batch-to-batch reproducibility. The batch-to-batch reproducibility was investigated by the

236

recovery study. Briefly, 2 mL spiked urine sample (10 pg/mL) was concentrated and analyzed in

237

triplicate as previously described using the TpBD-DS MNS from three batches. The mean

238

recoveries of each HAA obtained from three batches were compared, and their RSD was calculated

239

correspondingly.

240

Carry-over. To evaluate the carry-over effect of the MSPE procedure, the highest concentration

241

spiked sample (1000 pg/mL) and a non-spiked sample were selected as the test samples. First, the

242

spiked sample was extracted and analyzed as described above. The magnetic sorbent was collected

243

and washed with plenty of acetonitrile and water successively. Then, a non-spiked sample was also

244

extracted and analyzed as the same procedure using the collected composites. The carry-over effect

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 31

Page 11 of 31

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

245

of each HAA was calculated using the equation (Ao- An)/Ah, where Ao and An is the peak area of

246

the non-spiked sample measured using the old and new magnetic sorbent, Ah is the peak area of

247

the spiked sample.

248

3. Result and discussion

249

3.1 The synthesis and characterization of TpBD-DS MNS

250

For the preparation of MNPs adsorbents, the different methods such as embedding35, layer-by-

251

layer36, encapsulation 37, physical mixing38, and chemical bonding30,32,39 were developed. In this

252

work, a novel dual shell TpBD-DS MNS was synthesized by using the controllable link shell

253

strategy according to the previous report with some modifications30. The bonding amount and

254

stability were significantly enhanced by controlling the thickness of the link layer. In the first step,

255

the influence of the TEOS amount on the distribution, morphology, and bonding thickness of SiO2

256

was investigated. As shown in Fig. S2, the TEOS amount can significantly affect the thickness of

257

the SiO2 shell and further regulate and control the distribution and morphology of synthesized

258

MNPs. And then a monomer-mediated in situ growth strategy was applied to construct magnetic

259

core–shell-shell COF nanospheres. Actually, during the process of this step, the formation of COFs

260

material can be affected by the concentration of 1,3,5-triformylphloroglucinol, the pressure in the

261

reaction tube, the type, ratio, and the acidity of solvent, the reaction temperature, and the time,

262

such that the thicknesses can be tuned using the reaction time and the closed vacuum environment

263

promote the formation of crystalline structures. In order to obtain more regular, narrow pore size,

264

and good dispersion magnetic COF in high yield, the reaction was conducted at 120 °C for 3d

265

under a vacuum according to the literature. Moreover, excess 1,3,5-triformylphloroglucinol was

266

added during the first step to form enough reaction site which can ensure the following experiment

267

runs smoothly. 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

268

The SEM and TEM were used to investigate the structure and morphology of the synthesized

269

magnetic nanospheres. As we can see from Fig. 1a, the SEM image indicated that the TpBD-DS

270

MNS adsorbent possesses spherical shape at about ca. 200 nm and was relatively mono dispersed,

271

which may significantly increase the adsorption sites and enhanced the adsorption ability for the

272

probes due to the larger specific surface area. Moreover, the TEM images (Fig. 1b and 1c) indicated

273

that the dual shell of SiO2 and TpBD were bonded on the surface of Fe3O4 with a thickness of

274

approximately 40 nm and 30 nm, respectively. The plate-like structure of TpBD can easily be seen

275

from the TEM images, which is consistent with the literature report. What’s more, the thickness

276

of the TpBD through our method is obviously thicker than the previous report26,30, which further

277

ensured the excellent adsorption ability of the prepared magnetic nanospheres. In addition to this,

278

as shown in Fig.1d, 1e, the Energy dispersive X-ray (EDS) analysis further confirmed the existence

279

and distribution of Fe, Si, N, C and O.

280

In order to further to verify the cladding of TpBD, FT-IR spectrum was used to characterize the

281

nanospheres of Fe3O4@SiO2-NH2, Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD and TpBD (Fig. 2a). In the spectrum, the

282

absorption peaks at 560 cm-1 and 1100 cm-1 were attributed to the vibration of Fe-O-Fe and Si-O-

283

Si, respectively, which are attributed to providing evidence for silica coating of magnetite

284

nanospheres. Both TpBD and Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD have a strong peak at ∼1582 cm-1 and a weak

285

peak at ∼3100 cm-1, which can be attributed to the stretching vibration of C=C and C=C-H,

286

respectively. In addition to this, the characteristic absorption peak of the FT-IR spectrum of TpBD

287

and Fe3O4 @SiO2 @TpBD at ~1276 cm-1 can be attributed to the CN functional group. All this

288

result further confirms that TpBD was successfully coated on the surface of Fe3O4@SiO2.

289

The XRD was used to identify the crystalline structure of Fe3O4, Fe3O4@SiO2, and

290

Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD MNPs (Fig. 2b). Diffraction peaks at 30.4°, 35.6°, 43.3°,53.8, 57.3°, and

12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 31

Page 13 of 31

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

291

62.8° were observed in both Fe3O4@SiO2 and Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD MNSs, which match well with

292

the bare Fe3O4. This implied that the spinel structure of magnetite was retained in the preparation

293

of these MNPs. Moreover, the first and most intense peak at ∼3.5° (2θ) and a minor peak at ∼6.1°

294

demonstrate that crystallinity was achieved in both TpBD and Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD MNS.

295

However, the crystallinity of Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD MNS was significantly decreased, which may

296

be due to the embedding of Fe3O4@SiO2.

297

The intensity of magnetism is essential for magnetic materials separation from the liquid medium.

298

Therefore, the magnetic properties of the Fe3O4, Fe3O4@SiO2 and Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD were

299

evaluated (Fig. 2c). Their hysteresis curves exhibit that all three samples are superparamagnetic

300

with no hysteresis. The saturation intensities of magnetization were 42 emu/g for the

301

Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD, which is obviously lower than that of Fe3O4 MNS due to the nonmagnetic

302

coating of the SiO2 and TpBD. However, the saturation intensities of magnetization are enough

303

for the separation of the magnetic nanospheres from the liquid solution.

304

Nitrogen sorption analysis was also conducted to investigate the porosity of Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD.

305

As shown in Fig. 2d, Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD exhibits a typically reversible isotherm (I) curve, which

306

is suggestive of a microporous structure. The BET surface area is 171.367 m2 g−1, which is lower

307

than that of the TpBD porous material (295 m2·g−1) due to the doping of Fe3O4 nanospheres.

308

Nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) method was used to calculate the pore width of

309

TpBD with built-in Fe3O4. As we can see from Fig. 2e, the pore size distributions for magnetic

310

TpBD consisted of two parts. One part was at about 0.5383 nm due to the Fe3O4 nanospheres being

311

embedded into the TpBD network. The other one part was at about 1.3933 nm, which can be

312

attributed to the micropore structure of the TpBD network.

313

The thermogravimetric curves (Fig. 2f) was performed to evaluate the thermal stability and the

13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

314

bonding amount of the synthesized MNPs. As shown in Fig. 2f, the weight loss for

315

Fe3O4@SiO2@TpBD was only 3.02% in the range of 44.7-300◦C. While the weight loss was

316

approximate to 26.57% in the range of 300-800◦C, which maybe attributes to the loss of organic

317

moieties on the surface of Fe3O4@SiO2 nanospheres. Thus, we can say that TpBD was successfully

318

coated on the surface of Fe3O4@SiO2 nanospheres. Moreover, the results simultaneously proved

319

that the prepared magnetic nanospheres possess higher chemical and thermal stability.

320

3.2 Molecular interaction mechanism

321

The aromatic rings, partially protonated nitrogens and macrocyclic cavity of TpBD endowed it

322

with a unique porous structural framework, large conjugate system and the multiple recognition

323

sites. HAAs are positively changed and π-electron rich chemical compounds containing at least

324

one heterocyclic ring, as well as at least one electron donating group amine (nitrogen-containing)

325

group or methyl group. Therefore, excellent adsorption ability and high selectivity of TpBD

326

towards HAAs can be anticipated based on various possible molecular interactions, including π…π

327

interaction, LP…π interaction, N-H…O hydrogen bond, C-H…π interaction.

328

In order to further confirm our inference, 6 representational HAAs were selected as the model

329

molecular and non-covalent interaction (NCI) was performed as a theoretical strategy to visualize

330

weak interactions between TpBD and HAAs. The NCI results in Fig.3 show that the π…π

331

interaction, LP…π interaction, N-H…O hydrogen bond, and C-H…π interaction play important

332

roles in the origin of the specific selectivity. Pyridine, benzene rings and partially protonated

333

nitrogens play an important role in governing the supramolecular assembly of the complexes by

334

establishing π–π interactions and hydrogen bond interaction. Moreover, the benzene, heterocyclic

335

ring, amine group and methyl group of HAAs promote the formation of N-H…O hydrogen bond,

14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 31

Page 15 of 31

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

336

LP…π interaction, C-H…π interaction. NCI analysis clearly indicates the excellent adsorption

337

potential of TpBD towards HAAs.

338

3.3 Optimizations of the UPLC-MS/MS parameters

339

In order to get good separation and high responses for 14 HAAs, the separation parameters were

340

optimized. Firstly, various HPLC columns and the mobile phase were evaluated and optimized.

341

Four kinds of columns were tested, including Eclipse Plus C18 (4.6 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 μm),

342

Eclipse XDB-C18 (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm), ZOBAX SB C18 (3.0 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 μm) and

343

ZOBAX SB-C18 (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm). As we can see from Fig.S3, almost all of the HAAs

344

could be completely separated, with the highest responses on the column of Eclipse Plus C18.We

345

also carried out the ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) separation of HAAs with

346

different mobile phases. The best separation effects with high responses were achieved using the

347

conditions described in 2.2. The chromatograms of 14 HAAs and 5 internal standard HAAs in real

348

urine sample are shown in Fig. S4.

349

3.4The optimization of products ions of each HAA

350

The product ions of each HAA and the internal standard is correlated to the selectivity and

351

sensitivity of the built method. Therefore, a product ion scan was conducted and the obtained CID

352

spectra of all the HAAs and the internal standard are listed in Fig.4. The most sensitive transitions

353

and the secondary transitions were selected for quantification and confirmation, respectively. And

354

the optimal DP and CE value, the precursor ion (m/z) and selected product ion (m/z) and are listed

355

in Table 1.

356

3.5 Optimizations of the MSPE procedure with TpBD-DS MNS

15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

357

In this part, the main main factors affecting MSPE, including the amount of TpBD-DS MNS used,

358

pH and volume of elution, desorption time and solvent were systematically optimized in the sample

359

pretreatment step (Fig. S5, a-e). 2 mL of standard solution sample spiked with 100 pg mL−1 of

360

HAAs were selected as the test probes. As shown in Fig. S5a, the recoveries remained almost

361

constant or even declining as the amount of TpBD-DS MNS increased from 10 mg to 50 mg. Thus,

362

10 mg was enough to achieve satisfactory concentration efficiency compared with other levels. So,

363

10 mg was selected as the optimal amount of the sorbent. The kinds and composition of elution

364

are other important factors that should be optimized. As we can see from Fig. S5b, ACN containing

365

a certain amount of NaOH gave the highest recoveries. The influence of NaOH on extraction most

366

probably occurred as a consequence of the distinct interactions among HAAs, sorbent and

367

extraction solvent. On the one hand, the high pH value can affect the ionization state of the

368

functional groups existing on the adsorbent and HAAs. Then further influence the adsorption

369

performance. On the other hand, in the alkaline solvent system, hydrogen bonding interaction and

370

the strong cation-π interaction between the sorbent and HAAs could be replaced by Na+ and OH-,

371

respectively, although many other interactions are also involved and the mechanism is complex.

372

Following, the amount of NaOH added to the elution was also investigated (Fig. S5c). In this

373

section, spiked amounts of NaOH solution (1%) ranging from 50 to 300 μL were evaluated, and it

374

was found that 300 μL was the optimal spiked amount to provide higher extraction recoveries.

375

When the desorption time was changed from 0.5 min to 10 min (Fig. S5d), the recoveries increased

376

with the desorption time from 0.5 min to 3 min and decreased from 3 min to 10 min. Therefore, 3

377

min was selected to conduct the follow-up experiment. The effects of elution volume on the MSPE

378

efficiency were also optimized. As we can see in Fig. S5e, 4 mL can meet the requirement for

379

HAAs detection. In addition to this, after being washed with plenty of acetonitrile and water

16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 16 of 31

Page 17 of 31

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

380

successively, the collected composites can be easily recycled and reused five times (Fig. S5f)

381

without any significant loss of performance.

382

3.6 Matrix effect, Linear Regression Equation, LOD and LOQ of the Method

383

The matrix effect on the results was evaluated by comparing the response of the 14 HAAs in pure

384

solvent and purified urine matrix. Because there was no blank for the urine matrix, the standard

385

addition method was selected to conduct all the comparison experiment. The obtained results

386

showed that the matrix may suppress the response of Norharman, IQ, Glu-p-1, AaC Trp-p-2, IQx,

387

Glu-p-2, MeIQ, PHIP, and enhance the response of Glu-p-1 and DMIP. To eliminate the matrix

388

effect, the internal standards method was selected to build the calibration curves of the 14 HAAs

389

in purified urine matrix and pure solvent. The standard HAAs at five different concentration added

390

with internal standard were prepared in quintuplicate. As shown in Table 2, the squared regression

391

coefficients (R2) of all HAAs vary from 0.9989 to 0.9999 in two calibration curves, and the slopes

392

of all analytes are extremely similar. The slope ratios of the two curves ranged from 0.91 to 1.28.

393

These values were all within the acceptable limits. This may be due to the matrix effect could be

394

effectively counteracted by internal standards. For simplicity, the calibration curves of the pure

395

solvent were selected for the analysis in the ensuing experiment. The limits of detection (LOD)

396

and quantification (LOQ) were determined by a signal/noise ratio (S/N) equal to 3 and 10,

397

respectively. As shown in Table 2, the LOD range for the 14 HAAs ranged from 0.14 to 0.46

398

pg/mL, and the LOQ range for the 14 HAAs ranged from 0.41 to 1.37 pg/mL. These LOD or LOQ

399

are notably lower than the previously published works by CE-MS and HPLC-MS12,40.

400

3.7 Validation of the method

401

A spiked recovery method was used to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the developed

402

method. Non-smoker urine sample spiked with standard HAAs solution at three different 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

403

concentration levels were concentrated and analyzed as previously described in triplicate. As we

404

can see in table 3, the recoveries at three levels ranged from 95.4% to 129.3% with a max RSD

405

value of 7.3 %. The intra-day or inter-day precision was appraised by RSDs (below 6 %) of peak

406

areas (n = 5) at 100 pg/mL. The chromatogram of spiked sample at 10 pg/mL was shown in Fig.

407

S6. Compared with the published method12, all the results indicated that the proposed MSPE-

408

UPLC-MS/MS method based on TpBD-DS MNS possessed higher recoveries and accuracy.

409

The batch-to-batch reproducibility was confirmed by the recovery study using TpBD-DS MNS

410

obtained from different batches. The standard HAAs solution at 10 pg/mL was spiked in a non-

411

smoker urine sample, then concentrated and analyzed in triplicate under the optimum extraction

412

conditions. As shown in Table S1, the RSD value (n=3) ranged from 2.17% -12.25%, which

413

indicate the good batch-to-batch reproducibility of the synthesized magnetic sorbent. We also test

414

the TpBD shell thicknesses of six batches, the results showed that the thickness ranged from 30 to

415

32 nm with an RSD value of 3.32%。

416

3.8 Carry-over effects

417

As we all know, a disadvantage inherent in the application of SPE or MSPE is the risk of carry-

418

over from the previous sample. To investigate the carry-over effect of the MSPE procedure, the

419

highest concentration spiked sample (1000 pg/mL) was first extracted, and a subsequent non-

420

spiked sample was extracted using the collected composites, which has been washed with plenty

421

of acetonitrile and water successively. The analyte areas obtained were compared, we found carry-

422

over of 14 HAAs ranged from 0.00% to 0.06%. Therefore, it is expected there will be negligible

423

interference from carry-over in the assay.

424

3.9 Determination of HAAs in urine samples

425

To investigate the effect of cigarette tar levels on HAAs exposure levels, the urine samples from 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 31

Page 19 of 31

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

426

and nonsmokers (20 subjects) were compared smokers smoking cigarettes containing different tar

427

levels (60 subjects). The creatinine correction method was used to normalize the different water

428

content of the subjects selected for the project. And a commercial Creatinine Plus kit was used to

429

measure the urinary creatinine. The t-test method with the data statistics software (GraphPad Prism

430

version 5.0) was used to analysis the determination results of urinary HAAs. Based on the data

431

statistics analysis results, the relation between cigarette smoking with different tar yields and

432

urinary HAAs content was evaluated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

433

According to the results, MeAaC was only detected in several samples. While as shown in Fig. S7,

434

IQ and Trp-p-2 were detected in both smoker and non-smoker samples, and the exposure levels

435

were similar in smokers and non-smokers. On the contrary, the exposure levels of MeIQx, Glu-p-

436

1, and Glu-p-2 in most smokers samples were higher than non-smoker samples, although no

437

significant influence among smoker, non-smokers and smokers smoking cigarettes with different

438

tar level was found. However, it is worth noting that the other 6 HAAs, including Harman,

439

Norharman, DMIP, AaC, IQx, MeIQ, were detected in most urine samples and obvious relationship

440

among exposure level, smoker, non-smokers and smokers smoking cigarettes with different tar

441

level can be found. As we can see from Fig.5, almost all the P values of smokers and non-smokers

442

(