Food Proteins - ACS Publications

1

Chemical

Modification

of

Food

Proteins

ROBERT Ε. FEENEY

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO on July 21, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1977 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1977-0160.ch001

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, Calif. 95616 Alteration of the chemical structure of food proteins can be caused by deteriorative reactions arising during processing and storage, and by modifications with chemical reagents intentionally done to alter the properties of the proteins. The deteriorative type includes the Maillard reaction and the alkaline degradations leading to compounds like lysinoalanine. Although the intentional chemical modification of food proteins is currently applied to only a limited extent, it offers opportunities for improving food proteins and extending their availability from nonconventional sources. Chemical modifications of protein side chains can: (a) im prove the nutritional quality, (b) block deteriorations, (c) improve physical states (e.g., texturization), and (d) improve functional properties (e.g., whipping capacity). Whereas many such modifications are theoretically possible, careful considerations of the safety and acceptability are required.

Tphe modification of the properties of proteins by treatment with chemicals is widely used in fundamental studies (I). Since small changes in the chemical structures of proteins can result in large changes in their physical and biological properties, the chemical modification approach has been successfully applied to many biochemical problems. Most of these studies have been designed to obtain information concerning the mechanisms of action of biologically active proteins like enzymes. Although the addition of chemicals to foods has long been practiced, the intentional chemical modifications of food proteins are still largely found only in the patent literature and are practiced to only a very limited extent. Most of the exceptions are those instances where food proteins have been chemically modified for the purpose of producing an industrial, rather than a food, product. Obvious barriers to the chemical modifications of food proteins for human usage have been such factors as the esthetic, cultural, legal, and medical aspects. Although the litera3 Feeney and Whitaker; Food Proteins Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1977.


4

FOOD

PROTEINS

ture contains many references to the chemical modification of food proteins, nearly aU of these are similar to those of many of the authors' researches (1 ), which are fundamental studies on the proteins from foods rather than studies directed at solving immediate practical needs. Some chemical modifications of food proteins will be discussed in succeeding articles in this volume as well as in this chapter. The primary focus of this article, however, will be on the potentialities of chemical modification for improving the functionality, nutritional quality, and acceptability of food proteins. General Perspective of the Chemistry

and Chemical Reactions of Proteins

Historical Aspects. Alterations of the chemical, physical, and biological properties of proteins by chemically changing their structure have been an objective of protein chemists for many years. One of the first things discovered about proteins was how easy it was to change their properties by treatment with chemical reagents. In fact it was usually too easy, and most of the early changes were caused by labilities to the chemical reagents and the reaction conditions employed, rather than by the actual modifications. Lability of proteins is still, of course, one of the primary difficulties in handling proteins. Chemical modification of proteins, however, is now one of the most useful tools in biochemistry— a result of the application of modern knowledge of proteins, new chemical reagents, and much more sophisticated analytical techniques. Much of the history of protein chemistry is intimately related to the methods developed for determining structure and for analytical uses. The very early study of protein chemistry was concerned mainly with the chemistry of the individual amino acids. A major turning point was the work of many investigators, in particular Emil Fischer and his colleagues, on the synthesis and properties of small peptides. Overlapping with this chemistry and synthesis of peptides, and continuing into the present time, are the analytical methods for the amino acid side chains in proteins. In fact, the primary motivating factor in earlier studies of the chemical modification of proteins was the objective of determining quantitatively the amounts of amino acids that are components of proteins. Many of these methods are very harsh because the intent was to obtain an analytical value, and not to conserve the integrity of the protein. Some of the earlier methods are still very much in use and can also be used for modification of proteins. Such an analytical method, still used to some extent, is the modification of amino groups with nitrous acid. About the start of World War II there was increased emphasis on the chemical modification of proteins. Part of this undoubtedly stemmed from support of basic research aimed at learning more about the frac-

Feeney and Whitaker; Food Proteins Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1977.


1.

FEENEY

Chemical Modification of Food Proteins

5

tionation and use of blood plasma proteins and the properties of stabilization of proteins in foods, but some of the impetus came from the direct use of chemical modification for changing the properties of proteins. Certain studies of toxins and toxoids were also conducted, and the effects of various war gases and related substances on proteins and enzymes were studied. Pharmaceutical and Industrial Uses of Chemical Modification. One of the main uses of chemical modification by the pharmaceutical industry has been in the modification of bacterial toxins and viruses. Formaldehyde has been used to kill, inactivate, or so change the virus or toxin as to make it incapable of inducing its toxic or pathological response while still retaining its ability to produce an immunogenic response when injected into an animal or man. Toxoids are bacterial toxins which have been so treated. The pharmaceutical industry is also currently using chemical modification to make insolubilized enzymes, or to attach enzymes to insoluble supports for enzymatic conversions of drug intermediates. Many chemicals have also been used in leather and fiber technology, and almost all of these directly derivatize the constituent proteins. Some of the techniques used are like those with glutaraldehyde for forming cross-linkages and thereby stabilizing the substances. Others are used for the purpose of temporarily or permanently softening or solubilizing protein, as by reduction of the disulfide bonds. Literature Related to Chemical Modification. There is extensive literature on chemical changes caused by purposeful chemical modification. This literature has been directed primarily at fulfilling the rapidly developing needs in fundamental areas of protein research. Consequently nearly all the publications are directed at fundamental biochemistry and chemistry. A general textbook and research monograph on the subject was written by Means and Feeney (J). A recent monograph has also appeared (2). The most extensive and detailed general coverage is in two different editions of "Methods in Enzymology" (3,4). Recent review articles include those by Heinrikson and Kramer (5) and by Thomas (6). Articles on specialized subjects by Knowles (7, 8), Feeney et al. (9), and Feeney and Osuga (10) have also appeared recently. In contrast, reviews related to foods or food proteins are largely restricted to deteriorations or chemical modifications occurring inadvertently (9, 11, 12, 13). There is also extensive literature on specialized techniques for synthesizing or elongating polypeptide chains (14, 15), as well as for degrading or shortening these chains (16, 17). At present, such techniques are often used for fundamental studies on protein structurefunction relationships, or for analytical purposes, e.g., the Edman degradation for the determination of the sequences of amino acids in proteins (16).


β

FOOD

PROTEINS


General Properties of Proteins

Proteins are usually composed of almost all of the 20 common amino acids, or derivatives of than, plus varying amounts of attached substances, such as carbohydrates. The sequences of the amino acids in the protein structure govern the conformation (three-dimensional structure) of the protein in any particular environment. Changing either the sequence or types of amino acids, or the environment in which the protein is placed, can have extensive effects on the structure and properties of the protein. Types of Bonds in Proteins. Two kinds of bonds are usually present. The main covalent bonds are the peptide bonds between the amino acid residues and the disulfide bonds which are the cross-links. Both of these are subject to chemical modification. With very few exceptions, methods for chemical modifications must not affect the peptide bonds. In addition, there are certain other types of cross-linkages found in specialized pro teins such as in the structural proteins collagen and elastin. Table I.

Forces in Proteins

Force

Distance Acting (A)

Covalent Electrostatic Η bond van der Waals and hydrophobic

(CH -(C„ , -CH.cÎiij-SR) 3

2

5

NH Enz

0 CH -(CH ) -CH=C-CH -C-SR 3

2

5

2

J*. Enz Scheme 2 Science

Figure 5. The irreversible inactivation of βhydroxydecanoyl thioester dehydrase by Δ · decynoyl Ν-acetyl cysteamine. The enzyme cata lyzes the reversible interconversion of hydroxy decanoyl thioesters with their α,β-trans and β,γcis counterparts (Scheme 1). The acetyïenic analog is converted by the enzyme into the highly reactive conjugated aliène, which alkyhtes a histidine residue in the active center (Scheme 2) (23). (3

4)


16

FOOD

PROTEINS

The absolute number of essential residues, either of the same or different types of amino acids, can frequently be determined. One of the simplest and best methods is the use of one of the several types of active-site labeling reagents which have an easily monitored group attached. Such a group could be labeled with a radioactive element or with a distinct optical absorption band. One that has frequently been used with the "serine^-type enzymes is diisopropylfluorophosphate labeled with P . Since the same type of amino acid in a protein can have very dif ferent degrees of reactivity, these differences can sometimes be used to classify them into fast and slow, and sometimes even intermediate, degrees of reactivity. When this can be done, there may be only a few amino acids of a particular type in one of these classifications. If one of the amino acids in a classification is essential for the function of the protein, then it may be possible to do a kinetic analysis relating the loss of activity to the modification of residues in that particular class. It is then frequently a simple procedure to determine whether there are one, two, or more amino acid side chains required for activity. This was used to relate losses of activities with numbers of essential amino groups in ovomucoids. Turkey and penguin ovomucoids were easily shown to have one essential amino group (Table V) (27).


32

Table V. First-Order Rate Constants for Treatment of Inhibitors with Trinitrobenzenesulfonic Acid" First-order Inhibitor

Turkey ovomucoid Penguin ovomucoid Cassowary ovomucoid Colostrum inhibitor Duck ovomucoid Lima bean inhibitor Chicken ovomucoid Tinamou ovomucoid

rate constant (k min ) 1

Loss of trypsinModification of "fast" amino groups inhibitory activity

0.087 0.094 0.043 0.058

b

0.041 0.042

0.081 0.092 0.059 0.122 0.051 0.092 0.006

e

Adapted from Haynes et al. (27). Two amino groups are implicated. One could be part of the reactive site ; the other could be in or near the active center. The modification of either could cause inactivation. Duck ovomucoid inhibits two trypsins simultaneously. It was not possible to separate the fast and intermediate amino groups. Difficulties encountered in distinguishing among rates of three differently react ing amino groups. * Chicken ovomucoid has an arginine at the reactive site and therefore no essen tial amino group. Tinamou ovomucoid inhibits chymotrypsin, not trypsin. No loss in activity against chymotrypsin was observed. a

b

β

d

1



1.

FEENEY


17

Modifications to Introduce Special-Purpose Groups. An investigator sometimes wishes to introduce a group into a protein structure for the sake of having the group present in the protein, and not for any modification of the properties of the protein. These groups may serve as labels for tracing the protein through some physical or biological series of events or as labels to monitor changes in the conformation of the protein. These reagents have various names, such as environmentally sensitive labels (for detecting changes in conformation when a protein interacts with its environment or with some other substance or substrate), radioisotopic label, colored or fluorescent label (for following a protein through some process), or isomorphic replacement label (as a target for x-ray analysis ). A small molecule attached to a protein for the purpose of eliciting antibodies to the small molecule when the molecule-protein conjugate is injected into an animal is called a hapten. When antibodies are made for the hapten, many different types of experiments can be done, either with the free hapten and the antibody or with the hapten attached to the protein and the antibody. Modifications to Change Physical Properties. Modifications have been used extensively to change physical properties of proteins, although they are used more frequently to modify specific active-center residues for changing biochemical or chemical functions. Changing physical properties can, of course, result in changes in the biochemical functions also. Indeed, the purpose of changing the physical properties is frequently to study the specific effects of the physical change oa the biochemical functions. Modifications which alter the charges on amino acid side chains usually effect profound changes in the properties of the protein. The most obvious change is one in the isoelectric point of a protein, but the changes in charge can also affect the conformation of the protein and thus its overall functional activity. There have been many applications of changing charge in proteins in order to study both fundamental and practical phenomena. One of the common procedures for separating subunits of a protein is using a reversible reagent which will change the charge and cause the monomeric constituents to repel one another, and thus dissociate the polymers. Still another application of effectively changing charge is in the study of interactions of two proteins with each other. When ovomucoids were modified by procedures that made the proteins more acidic, they reacted much more rapidly with the proteolytic enzyme they inhibited (Figure 6) (28). The addition of hydrophobic groups to proteins should have many different effects on protein properties, depending upon the location of the additions and the type of hydrophobic groups. The most profound



18

FOOD

PROTEINS

effects would be on the general conformation of the protein, the solu bility, and the interfacial characteristics. Many studies have been made on the properties of polyhydrophobic amino acid peptides such as polyalanines (29). Hydrophobic residues such as cyclopentyl groups have also been attached to amino groups of lysine by reductive alkylation (30). The attachment of hydrophilic groups to protein could, in most instances, increase the solubility of the protein by increasing its affinity for water, and by changing its interaction with other substances. How ever, it might not have such extensive effects as the attachment of hydrophobic groups. The less probable effects from hydrophilic groups as compared with hydrophobic groups are easily understood when it is 80

70

ζο

un ν»

Ι< 60 oc h-

50

Point of Addition of Ovomucoid 120

240 SECONDS

360

480

Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Figure 6. Effect of chemical modification of turkey ovomucoid on its inhibition of bovine a-chymotrypsin (by delay time assays). Abbreviations used: Chy, chy motrypsin; TO, turkey ovomucoid; AcTO, acetylated turkey ovomucoid; AmTO, amidinated turkey ovomu coid; SucTO, succinylated turkey ovomucoid; 1TO, iodinated turkey ovomucoid; IAcTO, iodinated and acetylated turkey ovomucoid. To a mixture of enzymebuffer and substrate (benzoyl tyrosine ethyl ester, plus m-nitrophenol as indicator) was added the inhibitor solution within 18-25 sec and the enzyme activities recorded on a chart at 395 mμ. The weight ratio for chymotrypsin and the turkey ovomucoids was 22:15. The percent change in transmission is proportional to the amount of enzyme activity. At the time of the addi tions of the inhibitor, the enzyme was hydrolyzing the substrate (28).



1.

FEENEY

19


10

20

30

DURATION OF

40 HEATING

50

60

(mm)

Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Figure 7, Loss of activity on heat treatment (60°C) of sweet potato β-amylase (Φ) and its conjugate with dextran (O) (31)

remembered that the outer surface of the protein is already relatively hydrophilic. Nevertheless, when polysaccharide dextran was conjugated with the enzyme sweet potato β-amylase, the product was much more stable in the presence of heat than was the original protein (Figure 7) (31).

When a protein is reduced so as to modify the disulfides and form sulfhydryls, this change, with very few exceptions, causes such large and drastic effects on the protein's conformation that biological activities are absent in the product. With many proteins, the disulfide bonds can be reformed by reoxidation with atmospheric oxygen. Correct pairings of sulfhydryls can be accelerated by the presence of mixtures of low molecular weight organic mercaptans and disulfides (32). Many different ways of reducing and reoxidizing, and many different types of reactions, can be included in this sequence of events. For example, when turkey ovomucoid is reduced and then reoxidized, its "double-headed" inhibitory capacities against trypsin and chymotrypsin are not regained to the same degree of reoxidation (Figure 8) (33). In addition, all the activity is regained before all the sulfhydryls are reoxidized to disulfides. When one of four disulfides of the pancreatic trypsin inhibitor is reduced by sodium borohydride, all the activity is still retained (34). Cross-linkages can be formed intramolecularly or intermolecularly by means of bifunctional reagents (J, 35). This is currently a rapidly expanding field for many different purposes. When the cross-linkages are intramolecular, the protein molecule is frequently more resistant to deformation when exposed to different environmental conditions. A n


20

FOOD

PROTEINS


100

01

1

1

I

I

2

3

L

4

TIME (HOURS) Biochimica et Biophysica Acta

Figure 8. Reformation of disulfides and inhibitory activities on reoxidation of reduced turkey ovomu coid, a dual inhibitor of bovine trypsin, and a-chymotrypsin with nonoverlapping sites. The disulfides of turkey ovomucoid were reduced with mercaptoethanol and the product purified. Reoxidation was made with protein concentrations of 60 ^g/ml in 0.006M Tris buffer at pH 8.2 at room temperature. (Turkey ovomucoid contains eight disulfides, all of which were reduced to 16 sulfhydryls in this experi ment. Of these 14 were found at the first sampling and five at the time the experiment was discon tinued.) Ay Trypsin inhibition; O, a-chymotrypsin inhibition; Φ, sulfhydryls per mole (33).

intramolecularly cross-linked protein could thus be more stable to dena turation. Sophisticated uses of cross-linkages for intramolecular modifi cation have included some which also incorporate affinity labeling. In these instances it might be possible to show areas of the protein that are near one another topologically in the native active protein molecule. There are many different applications of intermolecular cross-linkages of proteins. A currently active area is the mapping of the positions of proteins on ribosomes (36). Attachment of proteins to solid supports has been a development primarily of the attachment of enzymes to solid supports to make immo bilized enzymes (37). The attachments can be made by many different biochemical reactions. The selection of the appropriate reaction depends


1.

21


FEENEY

on the relative importance of modifying different types of side chains on the protein. Immobilized enzymes are discussed in more detail in other chapters of this volume.


Typical Reactions for the Chemical Modification of Proteins

Typical reactions have been conveniently classified on the basis of the type of reagent used (I). The following is an abbreviated list of these modifications. Acylation Reagents. Acetylation with acetic anhydride:

\ (7)—NH

2

+ 0^

C—CH

3

p

>

H

Ο 7

C CH;j

> Q — N H — C — C H + CH3COO- + H* 3

Carbamylation with cyanate: (p)-NH

2

+ HNCO

p

H

^

>

?

Q - N H - C -NH

2

0

\

pH pH 6 to 8

(V)-S-+ HNCO + H 0 2

s

s.

\ ÇPJ—S—C—NH

-\- OH"

2

0 Guanidination with alkyl acetimidate: H N* \ 2

>^

Çpj—NH

2

+

^C—NH

*NH \\

pH>9.5 / - ^

2

> (V)—NH—C—NH + R O H

2

2

RO Alkylating Agents. Alkylation of several groups with iodoacetic acid: ( ? ) - S " + ICH COO2

p

H

-

7

» Q—S—CH COO" + Γ 2


22

FOOD

/-\

( V } - f J + ICH COO-

pH>5.5 < -

ttÇfy^x /

2

s

^N—CH COO" 2

PROTEINS

+ I" +

H H 2-8 5 (p)-S

+ICH COO-


(p)-NH

+1" CH

3

+ ICH COO"

2

(p)—S*

—

2

CH

^CH.COO"

2

P

>

8

3

\ ( ρ ) — N H — C H C O O - + Γ + H* 2

Reductive alkylation with formaldehyde: fpVNH V_s

2

+ 2H CO + i / N a B H 2

2!2i • pH 9 ( p ) - N ( C H ) + VzNaH B0

2

4

3

2

2

+ Vi H 0

3

2

Esterification. Esterification with methanol: s

.0 Ν

(V)-C^

+ CH OH

0.02 to 0.1 M HC1

3

0 ^-^ / *• ( p ) — V

OH

+ H 0

OCH

2

3

Amidation. Amide formation with amine and condensing agent:

©

S —CT \

pH ~ 5

/

—

N

^

+ NH —R

! »» ( p V c R'—N=C=N—R" V_y \ 0" NHR Oxidation. Strong oxidation of sulfhydryls and disulfide with performic acid: 2

Ο

Ο

(?)-SH + 3 H - c /

- g)_S0 H + 3 H - C ^ 3

O—OH

(p}-S-S__(p)+

5

H

\ ) H

.0 0 - C ^ 4. H 0 — » 2 ( p ) - S 0 H + 5 H - C ^ 2

3

0—OH


OH

1.

FEENEY


23


Purification and Analysis of Chemically Modified Proteins

Selection of Methods. The purification and analysis of a chemically modified protein can be as formidable a task as the chemical modification itself (20). An important general rule to follow in the selection of the proper procedures for the purification and fractionation of modified proteins is that the selections must be on an operational basis. Any method of purification should be selected with regard to: the type of chemical modification, the manner in which modification is done, and the purpose of the modification. It is frequently necessary to change the original chemical modification to give a product which can be purified more easily. Similar reasonings may also be applied to the selection of techniques for analyses of the products. Fortunately, sometimes purifications can be accomplished by very simple methods such as precipitation by salt or changing pH. Sometimes the extents of modification can also be determined by simple methods such as gel electrophoresis or determination of amino groups. More often, however, the methods required are much more difficult. Problems Encountered in the Purification and Analysis of Chemically Modified Proteins. One of the main problems plaguing the chemical modification expert is the heterogeneities of the products. With chemically modified proteins heterogeneity may make purification nearly impossible and analysis merely a reflection of an average value for the heterogeneous population of molecules. Heterogeneity can be caused by incomplete modifications as well as by side reactions of either a physical or chemical nature. Careful considerations of these as well as other possible problems is mandatory in achieving satisfactory purifications and analyses. A recent review (10) should be consulted for a more comprehensive discussion of the purification and analysis of chemically modified proteins. Chemical Changes in Food Proteins Caused by Deteriorative Reactions

Food proteins may undergo many different types of chemical changes during processing and storage. These changes, while usually deleterious, are sometimes beneficial. Although the deteriorative chemical changes are not the chemical modifications which are the main subject of this article, chemical treatments or additions are employed to control such deteriorative reactions. Two of the deteriorations will be discussed briefly (for a more complete discussion see Ref. 13). The Maillard Reaction. The Maillard reaction is probably one of the best known deteriorative reactions in the drying and storage of foods containing carbohydrates. The initial reaction is a carbonyl-amine reaction between the carbonyl group of the carbonyl compound ( usually



24

FOOD

PROTEINS

glucose, fructose, or pentose) and the amino groups of protein (9). Proteins may become insolubilized, giving off colored products and offflavors. A loss of nutritive value occurs, but there is usually no gross toxicity in products still acceptable for consumption. The loss of nutritive value has been the subject of numerous investigations (38). Effects of Alkali. Although alkali had been used to treat certain foods for many years, only recently has it been used widely by the texturized protein industry. Alkali-mediated degradation of proteins has long been known (13, 39-44). Some of the main initial reactions are apparently ^-eliminations of cystines and substituted serines and threonines. The products ( or their intermediates ) then alkylate various other amino acid side chains to form substances like lanthionine and lysinoalanine [N -(DL-2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)-L-lysine]. Possible toxicities are currently under investigation (45, 46), but nutritional losses could also be important. In addition to the loss of several amino acids by alkaline treatment, and the possibility of toxic compounds being produced, alkali may also cause racemization of amino acids (47), which can also occur with roasting (48). There is need for further nutritive investigations of such racemized products, as well as for fundamental studies on the racemizations of amino acids in different proteins under various conditions (48). €

Application of Chemical Modification to Food Proteins

Some General Objectives of Chemical Modifications of Food Proteins. The application of chemical modification to foods is a very young technology (13). The author prefers to consider it a technology for the future. Some of the more obvious possibilities will be considered in this section. Three general objectives are: the blocking of deteriorative reactions, improvement of physical properties, and improvement of nutritional properties. Deteriorative reactions affecting proteins have been discussed in the previous section, and are also covered elsewhere (13). The general purpose here is to modify the proteins to either prevent a chemical reaction or greatly retard its rate. These objectives can be accomplished by blocking a protein group which undergoes a reaction, or by changing the conditions, thus greatly retarding the reaction. Improvements of the physical properties include modifications to change the gross physical characteristics, such as texture, and to change the physical chemical interactions important to functional properties in cookery, such as foaming and whipping capabilities. Physical chemical laboratory methods and standards for assessing physical characteristics, unfortunately, are not well developed at this time (49).



1.

FEENEY


25

Texturized protein foods have become very important in commercial food products (50). Some of the methods used involve chemical changes perhaps only indirectly (such as alkali-produced cross-linkages). Here is a probable place for advances in food technology in the application of chemical cross-linking agents under controlled conditions. This would include the bifunctional reagents. Chemical modifications affecting solubility would also affect many of the protein properties in foods. These could be achieved through such techniques as changing the isoelectric point or changing the interaction with water or other substances in the food products. Products with superior properties for use because of their functional characteristics in cooking may prove to be those which receive the most attention insofar as the application of chemical modification to food proteins goes. When low-cost proteins and proteins from different sources are used for these purposes, it is obvious that chemical procedures that can change physical properties and give them the characteristics required for these physical processes will be valuable. Although chemical modifications may receive extensive attention for improving the physical properties of proteins because these give economically desirable properties, improvement of the nutritional quality of proteins by chemical modifications may prove to be the most important use from the standpoint of society's fundamental needs. Improvement of the nutritional quality might be brought about by increasing the digestibility of the protein, inactivating toxic or inhibitory substances, or attaching essential nutrients to the proteins. Nutrients that might be attached could include essential amino acids. The attachment of coloring or flavoring agents to proteins might also improve their acceptability. Proteins have characteristics suitable for encapsulating other substances, particularly lipids. The purpose in such a procedure would be to protect the lipid from interaction with other food materials until the lipid would reach the digestive tract where protein could be removed. Biological Considerations with Chemically Modified Food Proteins. Perhaps the greatest barrier to the use of chemical modification of food proteins is the biological one. The following are some of the factors to be considered. Any chemically modified product must be acceptable organoleptically in order to be of any value. Ethnic and cultural habits might also dictate the chemical modifications used for different populations. Losses in nutritional value would be an undesirable effect of chemical modification and would usually be avoided. However, for products incorporated into mixtures of different proteins, reductions in nutritional value of certain amino acids might be inconsequential because sufficient amounts of the destroyed amino acids could be supplied by the other



26

FOOD

PROTEINS

proteins. This type of supplementation is common practice with other products in the food industry. In some products, however, even large losses in nutritional value would be inconsequential. This would be the case when the chemically modified product would be used to supply certain physical properties, and the amounts of proteins supplied by the product would be relatively small compared with the total protein composition. In other instances, only a very small amount of the total protein content might be modified, although that small amount would be modified extensively. Such an example will be discussed below in the chemical treatment of certain grains or seeds, wherein apparently only a small percentage of the total proteins (the surface proteins) are modified. Formation of toxic products by chemical modification is perhaps the area which will receive the most attention in future investigations. The possibility of forming toxic products frightens commercial research directors and higher administrators in industry. Toxicity in a protein is not a simple matter because of the complexities of protein structure and protein digestion in the digestive tract. A chemically modified protein might be toxic as: (a) the intact protein molecule, (b) certain peptide products produced from proteolytic enzymes in the digestive tract, or (c) the free, chemically modified amino acids. Toxicity of the intact protein when fed would easily rule out its use, but the latter two might be encountered only infrequently. Chemical modifications of chemical groups other than the side chains of amino acids in the protein might also form toxic or harmful substances. Nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and lipids all contain functional groups which could be derivatized by many of the reagents used for protein modification. In contrast to the other classifications just discussed, reversibility of modification would be a desired objective. A hypothetical example would be the use of a reagent which would block the Maillard reaction on amino groups, but which would be completely removed by the acidity in the stomach. This would be important if the blocked group were nontoxic but unavailable nutritionally. The protein would regain its complete nutritional value when the block was removed. Of course, an extrapolation of this concept is related to the removal of the blocking groups of modified amino acids after intestinal absorption, e.g., the removal of acetyl groups from e-amino groups of lysine by a kidney deacylase (51). Examples of Chemically Modified Food Proteins. Only a few examples can be quoted at this time, mainly because information from


1.

FEENEY

27



Table VI. Examples of Chemically Modified Food Proteins Reaction

Purpose

Ref.

1. Acylation of — N H 2 2. Dimethylation of — 3. 3,3-DimethylglutaricN H 2 anhydride treatment 4. Formaldehyde treatment 5. Formaldehyde treatment 6. Succinylation

Blocking Maillard Blocking Maillard Egg white "stabilization"

58 56 54

Functional property of flours Grain stabilization Solubilization, increase in emulsifying capacity

55 57

58-61

commercial research is not available. Some of the applications, both in the experimental stage and on a practical basis, are described in the chapter by Meyer and Williams (42) in this volume. A few examples will be discussed in this section, and some of the programs in the author's laboratory will be outlined. Modifications performed for six different purposes are listed in Table VI. In each instance, the direction of the work has proceeded along different routes. Bjarnason and Carpenter (38, 52, 53) studied the use of formylation, acetylation, and propionylation for blocking amino groups in food proteins. Many of these chemical modifications could be easily applied on a commercial scale. The formyl and acetyl derivatives were nutritionally utilized at least partially. The propionylated lysine was not utilized; however the propionylated lactalbumin was partially utilized ( Table VII). The acylation procedure lowered considerably the extent of the Maillard reaction. Previous investigations, in support of the observations of Bjarnason and Carpenter, have shown deacylase in the kidney (51). Gandhi et al. (54) made a general study of the effects of treating chicken egg white with 3,3-dimethylglutaric anhydride. Their work included examinations of electrophoretic diagrams as well as studies of the functional properties of the egg white for foaming, whipping, and cake baking (Table VIII). Extensive changes in properties were observed, but no attempts were made to vary conditions or reagent to achieve selectivity in the changes in properties. Primo et al. (55) studied the effects of formaldehyde and iodate on the properties of flours related to breadmaking (Table I X ) . Their data indicated that chemical treatments might be used in lieu of the curing techniques. Since formaldehyde is known to cause cross-links (9, 56), the results might indicate some effects caused by cross-linking. No attempts to characterize cross-links in the flour were reported. Primo et al. (57) studied the effects of formaldehyde on the stabilization of rice and grain. The results indicated that the formaldehyde treat-


28

FOOD

PROTEINS

Table VII. Comparison of Results from Rat Growth Relative activity of % of lysine e-NH substrates for rat groups in sample" kidney t-lysine t

unreacted


Material

acylase

(a)

Formyl Lysine Protein (lactalbumin) Acetyl Lysine Protein (BSA) Propionyl Lysine Protein (lactalbumin II) Control protein (BSA) Heat-damaged protein (BSA)

(51)

(b)

— 28

(94) —

0 15

(100) —

0 2 91 24

(0) — —

For the amino acids, the zero values were based on the failure to find free lysine by thin-layer chromatography; for the proteins, the direct FDNB-available lysine values were taken as the measure of unreacted lysine. β

ment stabilized the grain to physical deterioration occurring during trans portation, storage, and handling. Apparently the modification is restricted to the periphery of the grain and, therefore, to a very small amount of protein. Thus, any biologically adverse reactions would be relatively minor unless highly toxic compounds were produced. The latter was not reported. Succinic anhydride, a reagent frequently used to solubilize proteins (I), has been studied for its effect on the properties of: wheat flour by Table VIII. Performance of Glutarinated Egg White in Angel Food Cake (54) Mol DMGA/ mol EWP

b

3 6 15 30 60 150 β b

Meringue

specific

gravity

Cake volume (ml)

Treat-

Ratio

Control

ment

T/C

Control

Treat-

ment

T/C

0.160 0.153 0.148 0.154 0.154 0.172

0.138 0.133 0.127 0.125 0.119 0.118

0.86 0.87 0.86 0.81 0.77 0.69

613 596 505 345 345 240

639 602 285 230 265 230

1.04 1.01 0.56 — — —

e

c c

c

e

DMGA, 3,3-dimethylglutaric anhydride ; EWP, egg white protein. Unsatisfactory cake with both control and treated egg white.


Ratio

1.

29


FEENEY

and Metabolism Experiments Using Acylated Materials (52) Estimated

partition of lysine from test materials in rat experiments

% Available


for growth (c)

% Excreted Fecal (d)

Sum of Urinary (e)

c -\- d -\- e (f)

77

—

—

—

50 67

18 —

18 —

86 —

0 43 85 13

19 (-16) 14 66

41 41 1 4

60 84 100 83

b

This value is the sum of c and e alone, without the negative value for d sub tracted. 6

Grant (58), single-cell protein concentrates by McElwain et al. (59), and fish protein by Groninger and Miller (60) and Chen et al. (61). Succinylated fish myofibrillar protein had rapid rehydration and good dispersion characteristics at neutral p H (60). Succinylation of fish pro tein concentrate improved its emulsifying capacity and emulsion stability (61).

Our laboratory has long been studying the fundamental aspects of the chemical modification of proteins. Results of certain studies are now being applied to the chemical modification of proteins to obtain infor mation that might be useful for food processing. The dimethylation of proteins by the reductive alkylation of formaldehyde and sodium borohydride-treated proteins was initially investigated by our laboratory (30, 62, 63). More recently, the reductive methylation of proteins has been examined from the standpoint of possible use in foods (56). This program is probably a good example of changed emphasis in a research area, resulting in a change of objectives. Whereas our previous studies indicated no detectable side reactions with the usual techniques employed (30), it was now necessary to search more diligently for possible small amounts of nonspecific side reactions that might appear under certain conditions of application of the method for industrial use. None were found by the methods available when the procedure was done correctly, but it was observed that there was an extensive decrease in the rate of hydrolysis of the dimethylated proteins by α-chymotrypsin. When casein


30

FOOD

PROTEINS

Table I X . Effects of C u r i n g , Iodate, and Formaldehyde on Rheological Properties of D o u g h : Brabender farinogram (55)


Characteristics Water absorption (%) Dough development time (sec) Stability (min) Mixing tolerance index—5 min after peak (B.U.)

Un treated sample 55.9 60 8.5 295

FormalIodate-

dehyde-

sample

treated sample

treated sample

55.2 75

55.2 75

55.2 105

Cured

12 280

9 260

75

90

12.5 270

a

90

Degree of softening—12 min after peak (B.U.) β

B.U., Brabender units.

30

60

90

120

TIME(MIN) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 9. Digestion of casein and chem ically modified caseins by bovine a-chy motrypsin. Amino groups of casein were reductively methylated and the hydrolysis by a-chymotrypsin followed with time. ·, unmodified casein; •, reductively methylated casein—33% modified; •, reductively methylated casein—52% modified. The casein concentrations were 0.2 mg/ml in 0.02M borate buffer at pH 8.2 and the a-chymotrypsin was 3.2 μg/ml. The hydrolysis was followed by the procedure of Lin et al. (62) [Figure from Ref. 56].


75

1.

FEENEY

τ


31


1

1

1

Γ

TIME (MIN) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 10. Inhibitory effects of peptides from chymotryptic hydrolysates of modified bovine serum albumin (BSA) on hydrolysis of BSA by bovine a-chy motrypsin. BSA was acetylated and then reductively methylated. Eight ml (0.87 mg/ml) of this product in 0.012M Tris buffer and 0.012U CaCl pH 7.7, was incubated at 37°C for 24 hr with 200 pg of a-chymotrypsin. The solution was then boiled for 10 min. Aliquots of this mixture of peptides were then added in the indicated proportions of BSA to the peptides. The various ratios of BSA to peptides in assay were: 17:1 (%); 3.5:1 (M); 1.7:1 BSA alone (O). The BSA concentration was 0.2 mg/ml in 0.02 M borate buffer at pH 8.2 and the a-chymotrypsin was 3.2 ^g/ml. The hydrolysis was followed accord ing to a modification of the procedure by Lin et al. (62) [Figure from Ref. 56]. 2>



32

FOOD

PROTEINS

was modified to 50% dimethylation of its amino groups, the hydrolysis was greatly diminished (Figure 9). Because dimethylation should not affect the amino acid side chains susceptible to attack by a-chymotryp sin, and because of the obvious importance of this to the nutritional adequacy of such products, it was necessary to reexamine the method and to investigate this lowered susceptibility to α-chymotrypsin in detail. This decrease was caused by the inhibition of the α-chymotrypsin by the peptides formed from the dimethylated proteins (Figure 10). Thus there was no change in susceptibility of the bonds in the dimethylated protein, but rather a decrease in activity of the hydrolyzing enzyme as a result of product inhibition. Although it was not proven that this would be unimportant in the digestive system of an animal, considerations of the relative rates of removal and transport of materials in the animal, and the concentrations present, would indicate that this inhibition would have little, if any, importance. This same program is still under investigation, with emphasis on the use of the different types of alkyl groups to block the amino groups. Animal feeding experiments with these various alkyl ated amino compounds and proteins are presently being initiated. Blocking of amino groups by dimethylation is also being used to help understand changes in proteins subjected to dry heating. Transamidation of carboxyls with lysines, or of amides with lysines, can occur (38). Dimethylation should prevent this. Work in progress is employing the reductive alkylation procedure used for methylation to the covalent linkage of larger and different sized and shaped hydrophobic compounds to proteins. These will include the longer chain alkyl derivatives as well as some cyclic derivatives. Imidoesters also attach compounds to amino groups (J); these do not change the charge appreciably and are being tested. A third related program is the attachment of fatty acids to the amino groups of lysine by formation of an amide linkage. Little is known about the presence of amidases that might remove these groups either in the digestive tract or in the tissues, and consideration of these possibilities will necessarily be important. If these products are easily digestible, they open the door to many different types of groups being attached to proteins to change the hydrophobicity. A fourth way of attaching hydrophobic groups is the attachment of polyhydrophobic amino acids to proteins. There is much literature on this subject, and it should be possible to exploit the fundamental infor mation available. The attachment of hydrophilic groups to proteins can be done by methods similar to those used for the attachment of hydrophobic groups, and similar problems exist. Those under consideration in our laboratory include the reductive alkylation of sugar aldehyde groups to the amino



1.

FEENEY


33

groups of proteins (64). This reaction, of course, involves the first step of the Maillard reaction, namely, formation of the Schiff base, but with the simultaneous addition of the reducing agent, the intermediate is locked in as a reduced alkyl-amine, so there should be no possibility of the numerous breakdown products formed in the Maillard reaction. A second procedure involves the coupling of the amino groups of proteins to cyanogen bromide-treated carbohydrates (31). Various other methods can be used for coupling sugar to proteins, but much further work is necessary before these can be considered as possible methods for food uses. Conclusions

A special committee (65) has recommended process research related to methodologies for restructuring protein materials or combining proteins with other materials. The chemical modification of food proteins offers a means for economically producing high quality foods from both unconventional and conventional sources. Plants not now cultivated for mans food might be used to produce valuable foods. Almost everyone can accept the concept of the improvement of "natural foods" by pretreating them for easier digestion, for more nutrition, and for greater palatability. The fundamental scientific information is available to serve as models for the development of chemical methods for food uses, but this is as far as the field has progressed at this time. There are strong indications that certain simpler methods might be suitable. These include acetylation or methylation of amino groups and esterification of carboxy groups by ethylation. Extensive studies, however, still must be done on the applications to food proteins before a satisfactory method will be generally available. A major obstacle in the application of chemical modification to food proteins is the potential health hazard. The author believes, however, that this is an artificial barrier which exists only because inadequate financial support has been available for the necessary research. This research obviously must include extensive testing for the health hazards. Enzymatic procedures (66) offer advantages in regard to potential health hazards ( perhaps because of the fear the public has for the word "chemical") and can sometimes fill the need, but chemical procedures can frequently offer more possibilities for different products at low cost. If the major obstacle is not the return for a financial investment, but rather the size of the investment itself, the problem then seems to be one of finding the investment. Perhaps the only groups that can support the needed long-term research are national governments, international bodies, or multinational corporations in cooperation with these bodies (13, 67, 68).


34

FOOD PROTEINS

Acknowledgment


The author gratefully acknowledges advice and criticisms from many sources. Particular appreciation goes to Chris Howland for editorial assistance and to Clara Robison and Gail Nilson for stenographic assist ance. Background researches for this article were supported by F D A Grant F D 00568-02. Literature

Cited

1. Means, G. E., Feeney, R. E., "Chemical Modification of Proteins," HoldenDay, San Francisco, 1971, p 254. 2. Glazer, A. N . , Delange, R. J., Sigman, D. S., "Chemical Modification of Proteins. Selected Methods and Analytical Procedures," North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, p 205. 3. "Methods in Enzymology," C. H. W. Hirs, Ed., Vol. 6, Academic, New York, 1967. 4. "Methods in Enzymology," C. H . W. Hirs, S. N . Timasheff, Eds., Vol. 25, Academic, New York, 1972. 5. Heinrikson, R. L., Kramer, K. J. in "Progress in Bioorganic Chemistry," Ε. T. Kaiser, F. J. Kézdy, Eds., Vol. 3, Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974, p 141. 6. Thomas, J. O. in "Companion to Biochemistry. Selected Topics for Further Study," A. T. Bull, J. R. Lagnado, J. O. Thomas, K. F. Tipton, Eds., Longman, London, 1974, p 87. 7. Knowles, J. R., Acc. Chem. Res. (1972) 5, 155. 8. Knowles, J. R. in "MTP International Review of Science, Biochemistry Series One, Chemistry of Macromolecules," H . Gutfreund, Ed., Vol. 1, University Park, Baltimore, 1974, p 149. 9. Feeney, R. E., Blankenhorn, G., Dixon, H . B. F., Adv. Protein Chem. (1975) 29, 135. 10. Feeney, R. E., Osuga, D. T. in "Methods of Protein Separation," N . Catsimpoolas, Ed., Vol. 1, Plenum, New York, 1975, p 127. 11. Mauron, J. in "Protein and Amino Acid Functions. International Encyclo paedia of Food and Nutrition," E. J. Bigwood, Ed., Vol. 11, Pergamon, New York, 1972, p 417. 12. Ford, J. E. in "Proteins in Human Nutrition," J. W. G. Porter, B. A. Rolls, Eds., Academic, New York, 1973, p 515. 13. Feeney, R. E. in "Proteins for Humans: Evaluation and Factors Affecting Nutritional Value," C. E. Bodwell, Ed., Avi, Westport, Conn., 1976, p 233. 14. Gish, D. in "Protein Sequence Determination. A Sourcebook of Methods and Techniques," S. B. Needleman, Ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970, p 276. 15. Stewart, J. M., Young, J. D., "Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis," Freeman, San Francisco, 1969, p 103. 16. Edman, P. in "Protein Sequence Determination. A Sourcebook of Methods and Techniques," S. B. Needleman, Ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970, p 211. 17. Stark, G. R., Adv. Protein Chem. (1970) 24, 261. 18. Tanford, C., Adv. Protein Chem. (1968) 23, 121. 19. Sigman, D. S., Mooser, G., Annu. Rev. Biochem. (1975) 44, 889. 20. Hvidt, Α., Johansen, G., Linderstrøm-Lang, K. in "A Laboratory Manual of Analytical Methods of Protein Chemistry (Including Polypeptides). The Composition, Structure, and Reactivity of Proteins," P. Alexander, R. J. Block, Eds., Vol. 2, Pergamon, New York, 1960, p 101.



1.

FEENEY


35

21. Scoffone, E., Fontana, A . in "Protein Sequence Determination. A Source book of Methods and Techniques," S. B. Needleman, Ed., SpringerVerlag, New York, 1970, p 185. 22. Brown, W. E., Wold, F., Biochemistry (1973) 12, 828. 23. Rando, R. R., Science (1974) 185, 320. 24. Rando, R. R., Acc. Chem. Res. (1975) 8, 281. 25. Walsh, C. T., Schonbrunn, Α., Abeles, R. H., J. Biol. Chem. (1971) 246, 6855. 26. Bloch, K., Acc. Chem. Res. (1969) 2, 193. 27. Haynes, R., Osuga, D. T., Feeney, R. E., Biochemistry (1967) 6, 541. 28. Simlot, M. M., Feeney, R. E., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. (1966) 113, 64. 29. Haschemeyer, R. H., Haschemeyer, Α. Ε. V., "Proteins: A Guide to Study by Physical and Chemical Methods," Wiley, New York, 1973, p 445. 30. Means, G. E., Feeney, R. E., Biochemistry (1968) 7, 2192. 31. Marshall, J. J., Rabinowitz, M. L., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. (1975) 167, 777. 32. Saxena, V. P., Wetlaufer, D. B., Biochemistry (1970) 9, 5015. 33. Sjöberg, L. B., Feeney, R. E., Biochim. Biophys. Acta (1968) 168, 79. 34. Kress, L. F , Laskowski, M., J. Biol Chem. (1967) 242, 4925. 35. Wold, F. in "Methods in Enzymology," C. H. W. Hirs, S. N . Timasheff, Eds., Vol. 25, Academic, New York, 1972, p 623. 36. Sommer, Α., Traut, R. R.,J.Mol.Biol.(1975) 97, 471. 37. Zaborsky, O. R., "Immobilized Enzymes," CRC, Cleveland, 1973, p 175. 38. Carpenter, J. K., Nutr. Abstr. Rev. (1973) 43, 423. 39. Bohak, Z., J. Biol Chem. (1964) 239, 2878. 40. Ziegler, K., Melchert, I., Lürken, C., Nature (1967) 214, 404. 41. Gross, E., ADV. CHEM. SER. (1977) 160, 37-51. 42. Meyer, E. W., Williams, L. D., ADV. CHEM. SER. (1977) 160, 52-66. 43. Sternberg, M., Kim, C. Y., Schwende, F. J., Science (1975) 190, 992. 44. Provansal, M. M. P., Cuq, J. Α., Cheftel, T., J. Agric. Food Chem. (1975) 23, 938. 45. DeGroot, A. P., Slump, P., van Beek, L., Feron, V. J. in "Proteins for Humans: Evaluation and Factors Affecting Nutritional Value," C. E. Bodwell, Ed., Avi, Westport, Conn., 1976, in press. 46. Woodard, J. C., Short, D. D., Alvarez, M . R., Reyniers, J. in "Protein Nutritional Quality of Foods and Feeds," M . Friedman, Ed., Vol. 2, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1975, p 595. 47. Neuberger, Α., Adv. Protein Chem. (1948) 4, 297. 48. Hayase, F., Kato, H., Fujimaki, M., J. Agric. Food Chem. (1975) 23, 491. 49. Ryan, D. S., ADV. CHEM. SER. (1977) 160, 67-91. 50. "Fabricated Foods," G. Inglett, Ed., Avi, Westport, Conn., 1975. 51. Leclerc, J., Benoiton, L., Can. J. Biochem. (1968) 46, 1047. 52. Bjarnason,J.,Carpenter, K. J., Br. J. Nutr. (1969) 23, 859. 53. Bjarnason, J., Carpenter, K. J., Br. J. Nutr. (1970) 24, 313. 54. Gandhi, S. K., Schultz, J. R., Boughey, F. W., Forsythe, R. H.,J.Food Sci. (1968) 33, 163. 55. Primo, Ε., Barber, S., Benedito de Barber, C., Ribo, J. in "The Contribution of Chemistry to Food Supplies," I. Morton, D. N. Rhodes, Eds., Butterworths, London, 1974, p 357. 56. Galembeck, F., Ryan, D. S., Whitaker, J. R., Feeney, R. E., J. Ag. Food Chem. (1977), in press. 57. Primo, Ε., Barber, S., Benedito de Barber, C., personal communication, 1975. 58. Grant, D., Cereal Chem. (1973) 50, 417. 59. McElwain, M., Richardson, T., Amundson, C., J. Milk Food Technol. (1975) 38, 521. 60. Groninger, H., Jr., Miller, R., J. Food Sci. (1975) 40, 327.



36

FOOD PROTEINS

61. Chen, L., Richardson, T., Amundson, C., J. Milk FoodTechnol.(1975) 38, 89. 62. Lin, Y., Means, G. E., Feeney, R. E., J. Biol Chem. (1969) 244, 789. 63. Lin, Y., Means, G. E., Feeney, R. E., Anal. Biochem. (1969) 32, 436. 64. Gray, G. R., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. (1974) 163, 426. 65. Scrimshaw, N. S., Wang, D. I. C., Milner, M., "Protein Resources and Technology: Status and Research Needs. Research Recommendations and Summary," NSF-RA-T-75-037, Cambridge, Mass., 1975. 66. Whitaker, J. R., ADV. CHEM. SER. (1977) Am. Chem. Soc., Wash., D. C., 160, 95-155. 67. Revelle, R. in "War on Hunger," Report of Agency of International Devel opment, Vol. 2, No. 6, U. S. Government Publication, 1968,p1. 68. Feeney, R. E. in "The Social Responsibility of the Scientist," M. Brown, Ed., Free Press, New York, 1971, p 228. RECEIVED January 26, 1976.


Food Proteins - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents