Geochemical Effects of Millimolar Hydrogen Concentrations in

Mar 12, 2018 - ... energy supply from renewable energy plants and energy demand of ... sustainable use of the subsurface space within the ANGUS+ proje...
1 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIV

Energy and the Environment

Geochemical effects of millimolar hydrogen concentrations in groundwater - an experimental study in the context of subsurface hydrogen storage Marton Berta, Frank Dethlefsen, Markus Ebert, Dirk Schafer, and Andreas Dahmke Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05467 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Mar 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 12, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 38

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Geochemical effects of millimolar hydrogen

2

concentrations in groundwater - an experimental

3

study in the context of subsurface hydrogen storage

4

Marton Berta*, Frank Dethlefsen**, Markus Ebert, Dirk Schäfer, Andreas Dahmke

5

Department of Applied Geology, Aquatic Geochemistry and Hydrogeology,

6

Institute of Geoscience, Kiel University

7

Ludewig-Meyn-Straße 10, 24118 Kiel, Germany

8

*[email protected], **[email protected]

9

ABSTRACT

Hydrogen storage in geological formations is one of the most promising

10

technologies for balancing major fluctuations between energy supply from renewable energy

11

plants and energy demand of customers. If hydrogen gas is stored in a porous medium or if it

12

leaks into a shallow aquifer, redox reactions can oxidize hydrogen and reduce electron acceptors

13

such as nitrate, FeIII and MnIV (hydro)oxides, sulfate, and carbonate. These reactions are of key

14

significance, because they can cause unintentional losses in hydrogen stored in porous media and

15

they also can cause unwanted changes in the composition of protected potable groundwater. To

16

represent an aquifer environment enclosing a hydrogen plume, laboratory experiments using

17

sediment-filled columns were constructed and percolated by groundwater in equilibrium with

18

high (2-15 bars) hydrogen partial pressures. Here we show that hydrogen is consumed rapidly in

19

these experiments via sulfate reduction (18±5 µM h-1) and acetate production (0.030±0.006 h-1),

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 38

20

while no methanogenesis took place. The observed reaction rates were independent from the

21

partial pressure of hydrogen and hydrogen consumption only stopped in supplemental

22

microcosm experiments where salinity was increased above 35 g l-1. The outcomes presented

23

here are implemented for planning the sustainable use of the subsurface space within the

24

ANGUS+ project.

25 26 27

28

Introduction

29

The energy production by wind turbines and solar panels fluctuates due to variable wind

30

velocity and solar radiation, while the energy demand of consumers also varies creating a

31

significant challenge for the stability of future energy supplies based mainly on renewable

32

sources. One concept to address this issue is the “power to gas” approach, where the generation

33

of a gas with high energy content uses the excess electrical energy at times where the public

34

energy demand is smaller than the produced energy. Large scale gas storage is a potentially

35

necessary element in this concept, allowing the gas to be available for reuse when the demand

36

for energy exceeds the supply. The overall difference between the amount of energy supplied by

37

renewable energy sources and the amount of energy demanded usually varies in time, but this

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 38

Environmental Science & Technology

38

gap may reach 10 GWh - 10 TWh, calculated as an example on a time scale of days to months on

39

a German regional scale power network1. Electrochemical generation, storage, and consumption

40

of molecular hydrogen (in the following just “hydrogen”) has the potential to balance such

41

fluctuating gaps1, 2. The volume of hydrogen corresponding to the amount of energy to be

42

balanced in an energy network ranges between millions to billions normal cubic meters2. The

43

subsurface may offer a comparatively cost-efficient and safe option for storing such large

44

quantities of gaseous hydrogen2-9. Moreover, sustainable, renewable-based energy systems will

45

likely require a series of subsurface energy storage technologies simultaneously.

46

technologies include chemical (hydrogen, synthetic methane), mechanical (compressed air), or

47

heat energy storage, facing the considerable amount of energy that needs to be stored and the

48

lack of other available storage technologies in the short or medium term fulfilling volume, cost

49

and response time requirements1.

Such

50

Power-to-gas energy storage including geological hydrogen storage is expected to play a

51

potentially deciding role in future energy networks, considering the following reasons. First,

52

large-scale development of renewable energy sources became a cornerstone of all national

53

energy policies following the Paris Agreement10, even if those actions are still unsatisfying

54

compared to the volume of development required to reach climate protection goals already

55

agreed on internationally11. Second, consequently, estimations on for instance German energy

56

supplies project up to 100% renewable power generation by 205012. Third, if more than ca. 80%

57

of the energy is produced by renewable sources in a power network then the inclusion of large-

58

scale storage facilities, like subsurface hydrogen storage, is suggested to be a prerequisite for

59

stable and profitable operation1. Overview studies on technical aspects of subsurface hydrogen

60

storage were published in the last few years13-16 as a part of an increasing research and industrial

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 38

61

interest, but field or experimental studies specifying potential environmental impacts or

62

operational issues linked to storing large amounts of pure hydrogen at elevated pressures in

63

geological media are missing so far. However, studies on hydrogen-containing gas mixtures

64

stored in porous town gas reservoirs hint that hydrogenotrophic redox reactions potentially

65

consume hydrogen at such conditions14, 17-21. These reactions may cause losses from the stored

66

gas and they may also change the composition of reservoir water. Furthermore, accidental

67

leaking of hydrogen into shallow aquifers22 may result in conditions where an enlarged hydrogen

68

partial pressure (i.e. equal to the hydrostatic pressure in case of a pure hydrogen gas phase) will

69

cause a high dissolved hydrogen concentration in the shallow groundwater, probably initiating

70

typical redox reactions associated with hydrogen oxidation.

71

Hydrogen-driven redox reactions are predominantly microbiologically catalyzed23 and well

72

known from aquatic geosystems, where hydrogen is the electron donor and O2, NO3-, FeIII and

73

MnIV(hydr)oxides, SO42-, or dissolved CO2 are usually the terminal electron acceptors (Table 1).

74

These redox reactions may produce NO2-, N2O, N2, NH4+, MnII, FeII, H2S, CH3COOH, or CH4,

75

which might be released into the pore water or precipitated into various mineral phases.

76

Reaction products such as NO2-, H2S or CH4 may have a negative effect on the composition of

77

the groundwater in terms of its usability for other applications, e.g. drinking water production24.

78

Moreover, groundwater itself is usually a protected natural good.

79

fermentative degradation of peptides, saccharides, and further organic substances produces

80

hydrogen25, while other microorganisms consume it, usually resulting in nanomolar

81

concentrations of dissolved hydrogen in a steady state25-41. A competition for hydrogen may

82

then result in the development of a typical redox sequence (i.e. decreasing redox potential with

83

increasing time or flow path length) because the electron accepting processes coupled to

In pristine aquifers,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 38

Environmental Science & Technology

84

hydrogen oxidation with the higher energy yield (e.g. sulfate reduction) outcompete the others

85

(e.g. acetogenesis) by keeping the hydrogen concentrations below a threshold concentration

86

required for that process (Table 1)42, 43. Amongst other possibilities, such reactive environments

87

may be numerically simulated assuming a dual substrate limitation by hydrogen concentration on

88

the one hand side and the concentration of sulfate or total dissolved inorganic carbon species on

89

the other. Furthermore, not only the occurrence but also the kinetics of the redox reactions is

90

usually dependent on the concentration of dissolved hydrogen in those hydrogen-limited reactive

91

environments and such processes are often modeled using Monod kinetics44-48.

92

In-situ remediation of contaminated aquifers may lead to elevated dissolved hydrogen

93

concentration, e.g. when applying zero valent iron (ZVI)49-51 or hydrogen releasing compounds52,

94

in hydrogenotrophic denitrification systems53-57, or during the sulfidogenic treatment of

95

wastewaters containing dissolved metal ions58, 59. Increased dissolved hydrogen concentration is

96

thereby either an aim of the technology (e.g. denitrification or sulfidogenic treatment) or a side-

97

effect (e.g. ZVI application for reductive dehalogenation). Usually, those systems also show the

98

establishment of redox sequences known from pristine aquifers, and the kinetics of the occurring

99

redox reactions also depend on the hydrogen concentrations created by hydrogen-producing

100

primary reactions46.

101

environments is mostly limited to a few hundred micromoles per liter.

Furthermore, the hydrogen concentration found in such reactive

In the context of the storage of pure gaseous hydrogen at pressures between 30 and 400 bars60-

102 103

62

104

per liter groundwater due to the roughly linear correlation between increasing depth and

105

increasing hydrostatic pressure as well as between increasing pressure and increasing gas

106

solubility following Henry’s law. Also an unintended leakage of pure hydrogen gas into a

in the subsurface, dissolution of hydrogen may result in concentrations of several millimoles

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 38

107

shallow aquifer (up to 140 m depth) will result in a much higher dissolved hydrogen

108

concentration than the nanomolar quantities usually present in aquifers (Table 1). Elevated

109

hydrogen concentrations will probably result in a surplus in hydrogen supplies for the microbial

110

community, which usually strives for hydrogen.

111

consuming hydrogen rapidly through a series of consequent redox reactions46,

112

simultaneous redox processes64 without the establishment of typical redox sequences. On the

113

other hand, the groundwater above a gas storage reservoir may have an elevated salt content and

114

a saltwater or brine intrusion might accompany a gas leakage into a shallow aquifer. Elevated

115

salinity potentially inhibits the microbiologically catalyzed redox reactions due to a limited

116

halotolerance of the microorganisms present65-72.

Therefore, the microorganisms may start 63

or through

117

In order to estimate the potential effects the subsurface storage of hydrogen could have on

118

groundwater, including the effects following an unintended leakage into a shallow aquifer, an

119

improved understanding of hydrogenotrophic redox reactions at high dissolved hydrogen

120

concentration is required, but investigations on those systems are missing so far, especially

121

regarding reaction kinetics. Available models on the spatial or temporal zonation of redox

122

processes arise in part from electron donor limitation, while after a gaseous hydrogen intrusion

123

into an aquifer the availability of hydrogen as electron donor is not limiting any more. The

124

knowledge on the establishing sequence of redox reactions, their reaction kinetics, and reaction

125

products is necessary for any risk assessment or spatial planning attempts and for modeling

126

efforts at reservoir or regional scales7, 8. Furthermore, monitoring and operation strategies for a

127

gas storage site also require knowledge about the fate of the stored gas in shallow aquifers

128

completed by an estimation of the impact the stored gas may have through volatile products of

129

redox reactions (e.g. H2S or CH4).

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

6

Page 7 of 38

Environmental Science & Technology

130

The study presented here shows results of a high pressure column experiment using natural

131

aquifer sediment and groundwater equilibrated with hydrogen partial pressures of 2-15 bars,

132

representing a scenario of hydrogen gas leakage into a shallow or medium deep aquifer. The

133

results enabled the development of a simplified reaction model scheme describing simultaneous

134

redox reactions at elevated dissolved hydrogen concentrations at flow through conditions,

135

including reaction kinetics and rate coefficients. Furthermore, results of a simple testing routine

136

for estimating the halotolerance of a microbial community are shown. The outcome of the study

137

is a first step in an improvement of the understanding of hydrogen oxidizing redox reactions in

138

the context of hydrogen gas storage. The contributions of this work will also be integrated into

139

the Compendium on Concepts and Methods for Quantitatively Deducting the Spatial Demand of

140

Subsurface Energy Storage prepared by the ANGUS+ research project facilitating future

141

improvements in planning the sustainable use of the subsurface space6-8.

142 143

Table 1. Hydrogen oxidizing reactions with associated Gibbs free energy yields under standard

144

conditions and neutral pH; and the concentrations of hydrogen typical for environments with

145

characteristic metabolic processes.

Reactions Aerobic hydrogen oxidation Hydrogen oxidation coupled to denitrification producing N2 Hydrogen oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction producing NH3 Hydrogen oxidation

2 H2+O2  2 H2O

5 H2+2 H++2 NO3-  N2+6 H2O

4 H2+2 H++NO3-  NH4++3 H2O H2+MnO2  Mn(OH)2

∆G0

H2

[kJ·mol(H2)-1]

[nmol·l-1]

-237

n.d.

73

-224

0.03

25, 46, 73

-150