Hybridization of Single Nanocrystals of Cs 4 PbBr ... - ACS Publications

Subscriber access provided by University of Rochester | River Campus & Miner Libraries

Article 4

6

3

Hybridization of Single Nanocrystals of CsPbBr and CsPbBr

Chris de Weerd, Junhao Lin, Leyre Gomez, Yasufumi Fujiwara, Kazutomo Suenaga, and Tom Gregorkiewicz J. Phys. Chem. C, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05752 • Publication Date (Web): 10 Aug 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 10, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

The Journal of Physical Chemistry

Hybridization of Single Nanocrystals of Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 Chris de Weerd1#*, Junhao Lin2#*, Leyre Gomez1, Yasufumi Fujiwara3, Kazutomo Suenaga2 and Tom Gregorkiewicz1,3 1

Institute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2

National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), AIST Central 5, Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan

3

Division of Materials and Manufacturing Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita,

Osaka 565-0871, Japan

#

These authors contributed equally to this work.

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 25

ABSTRACT Nanocrystals of all-inorganic cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X=Cl, Br, I) feature high absorption and efficient narrow-band emission which renders them promising for future generation of photovoltaic and optoelectronic devices. Colloidal ensembles of these nanocrystals can be conveniently prepared by chemical synthesis. However in case of CsPbBr3, its synthesis can also yield nanocrystals of Cs4PbBr6 and the properties of the two are easily confused. Here we investigate in detail the optical characteristics of simultaneously synthesized green-emitting CsPbBr3 and insulating Cs4PbBr6 nanocrystals. We demonstrate that in this case, the two materials inevitably hybridize forming nanoparticles with a spherical shape. The actual amount of these Cs4PbBr6 nanocrystals and nanohybrids increases for synthesis at lower temperatures, i.e. the condition typically used for development of perovskite CsPbBr3 nanocrystals with smaller sizes. We use state-of-the-art EELS to characterize nanoparticles at the single object level. This method allows distinguishing between optical characteristics of a pure Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 nanocrystals and their nanohybrid. In this way, we resolve some of the recent misconceptions concerning possible visible absorption and emission of Cs4PbBr6. Our method provides detailed structural characterization and combined with modelling we conclusively identify the nanospheres as CsPbBr3/Cs4PbBr6 hybrids. We show that the two phases are independent of each other’s presence and merge symbiotically. Herein the optical characteristics of the parent materials are preserved, allowing for an increased absorption in the UV due to Cs4PbBr6, accompanied by the distinctive efficient green emission resulting from CsPbBr3.

INTRODUCTION Semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs) are widely investigated due to their size-dependent energy structure.1-3 As the NC size approaches the Bohr radius, the quantum confinement (QC) sets in modifying the wave function of the free electron and hole,4-8 resulting in an increase of the bandgap energy. On the other hand, perovskites (ABX3) are emerging as promising materials for (low-cost)


Page 3 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


solar cells.9-17 More recently, all-inorganic cesium-lead perovskite (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br and I) NCs18 have attracted a lot of attention as they combine the advantageous properties of perovskites and NCs. They exhibit high photoluminescence quantum yields (PL QYs, 50-90 %), narrow emission bands, and their emission color can be easily tuned over the whole visible range by changing the composition and NC size.19-22 For CsPbBr3, next to the cubic-shaped NCs, also the formation of spherical NCs,23 nanowires (NWs),24-26 nanorods,27 and nanoplatelets28,29 has been reported by varying the reaction temperature and/or the ligands used in the synthesis. In fact, we have observed the formation of CsPbBr3 nanowires next to the nanocubes before.30 CsPbX3 is known to crystallize in orthorhombic, tetragonal, and cubic symmetries where the cubic structure generally appears at high temperatures.31-34 For instance, CsPbBr3 undergoes a phase transition at around 123 °C showing a cubic phase while at lower temperatures its phase should be monoclinic.31,35 It is also generally known that preparing pure CsPbBr3, in bulk, thin films, single crystals or nanostructures, is challenging. The phase diagram of the stable CsX-PbX2 (X=Br, Cl) system shows the existence of two complex ternary compounds, the congruent melting (i.e. maintaining the same atomic composition) compound CsPbX3 and incongruent Cs4PbX6.36,37 When preparing the CsPbBr3 (from PbBr2), the Cs4PbBr6 compound is expected to form as well if there is an excess of Cs, resulting in the CsBr:PbBr2 ratio being no longer exactly 1:1. And reversely, when growing Cs4PbBr6 crystals, it is difficult to prevent the formation of CsPbBr3 due to an unavoidable incongruent melting crystal growth process.38,39 In this work, we study the coexistence of CsPbBr3 and Cs4PbBr6 NCs and their hybridized form, and characterize them structurally and optically. We make use of valence-loss electron spectroscopy (EELS) in a state-of-the-art low-voltage monochromatic scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) with a spatial resolution below 1.6 Å. This provides the unique insight in the absorption features and energy structure of a single nanoparticle, which is investigated in parallel with its structural parameters. In spite of recent contradicting reports on the emissive properties of Cs4PbBr6,38,40-43 our single NC EELS measurements exclusively demonstrate that there can be no visible emission from pure Cs4PbBr6 NCs, which are insulating and have a large bandgap energy (~4 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 25

eV),38,39,44 therefore it is the CsPbBr3-phase within hybridized Cs4PbBr6/CsPbBr3 spherical NCs that is responsible for the green emission.

METHODS EELS in STEM. A droplet of the as-synthesized NCs solution is drop-casted onto an Au quantifoil TEM grid with the coverage of a monolayer of graphene. The TEM grid is then dried in a vacuum chamber for further characterizations. STEM imaging and EELS experiments were performed on a JEOL ARM200 microscope equipped with a Schottky field emission gun, a JEOL double Wien filter monochromator, probe delta corrector and a Gatan Quantum GIF spectrometer modified for low primary energy operation (15 - 60 keV) with high stability. Imaging and EELS collections are performed in high-energy resolution mode, where a slit of 0.5 µm is used for energy selection. In this condition, the electron probe has a zero loss peak with energy FWHM around 50 meV, a current of ~ 8 pA, and convergence semi-angle of 33 mrad. The EELS collection semi-angle was 11 mrad. The energy dispersion of the spectrometer was set to 10 meV/channel. A Gatan cryo-holder is used to cool down the sample at -110 °C with liquid nitrogen to reduce carbon re-deposition and thermal excitation during all the imaging and EELS collection experiments. Dual EELS acquisition was applied where the un-saturated zero loss peak are used to align the simultaneously acquired high-loss spectrum (which has much longer exposure time than the zero loss peak) to correct any energy drift during the acquisition. The probe size for the valence-loss EELS measurements was about 1.6 Å, providing an ultrahigh spatial resolution during the collection of the EEL spectra.54,55 All data are raw, without filtering. Optical characterization. The optical density was measured in a LAMBDA 950 UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer). A combination of a tungsten-halogen and deuterium lamp is used together with a PMT and Peltier cooled PbS detector, to provide a detection range of Edet = 5.6 - 0.4 eV. The sample and solvent (toluene) measurements have been performed separately and afterwards subtracted from each other to correct for the solvent absorption. The PL spectrum is 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


recorded by a Jobin Yvon FluoroLog spectrofluorometer (Horiba) equipped with a 450 W xenon lamp (250 - 700 nm) coupled to a monochromator to provide a selective range of excitation wavelengths. The emission is collected in a right-angle geometry and corrected for spectral sensitivity. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements. The powder XRD measurement was carried out on a benchtop MiniFlex II X-ray Diffractometer (Rigaku), from 5 to 50 degrees with a turning speed of 2.5 °/min.

RESULTS Colloidal NCs have been produced using the method described by Protesescu et al.18 The synthesis was carried out at two different temperatures, 100 °C and 160 °C. It is well-known that the synthesis temperature plays an important role determining the shape and size of CsPbX3 NCs.28 For the synthesis at 160 °C we observe cubic CsPbBr3 NCs with an average size of 8-10 nm, and also observed CsPbBr3 NWs and large nanoplatelets with high aspect ratio (see Figures S1 and S2 in the SI). We measure a PL QY of ~ 80% for excitation at Eexc = 3 eV indicating that the emission efficiency is not greatly affected. Additionally, larger nanoparticles (NPs, 10 - 20 nm) with a spherical shape and that appear hexagonal, are formed next to the nanocubes (Figure 1a) in the same sample. Cs4PbX6 has at room temperature a trigonal crystal structure.36,47 The Cs+ chains in Cs4PbX6 crystals, projected along the [0 0 1] plane, arrange in a hexagonal orientation.47-49 Therefore, in (high-resolution) transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images, the Cs4PbBr6 NCs will appear as hexagons (as of now referred to as nanohexagons) whereas the nanocubes are CsPbBr3 NCs. Lowering the synthesis temperature to 100 °C leads to the predominant formation of nanohexagons, while the nanocubes are the minority - Figure 1b, and see also Figure S3 in the Supporting Information (SI). This indicates that the production of either mostly nanocubes or nanohexagons is synthesis temperature-controlled and is in this case not governed by the amount of reactants (all other conditions are kept equal). It also demonstrates that the chemical reaction (ratio of the relative amount of desired and undesired product)50 is not 100 % to the desired product - CsPbBr3 NCs. The co-formation of different shaped 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 25

CsPbBr3 NPs and Cs4PbBr6 NCs has been observed for any sample produced in the temperature range between 100 °C – 200 °C. To confirm the elemental composition of the nanostructures in both samples, energy-dispersive Xray spectroscopy (EDS) is performed. Figure 1c shows the corresponding EDS spectra, where mostly Cs, Pb and Br are detected. The Au peak originates from the TEM grid. The ratio between Cs and Pb is determined at 4:1 for the 100 °C sample, corresponding to Cs4PbBr6. For the 160 °C sample this is 1.2:1 (where one would expect 1:1) indicating the presence of excess Cs, which is due to Cs4PbBr6 NCs that were formed instead of CsPbBr3 NCs. The coexistence of both compounds has been reported before, in bulk and thin films as well as in nanometer sized aggregates dispersed in a crystal lattice.26,38,51 To confirm that they coexist in NC form in the sample synthesized at 100 °C, X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed. The corresponding XRD pattern is shown in Figure 1d, with the peaks associated to Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 denoted by ‘a’ and ‘b’, respectively, indicating the presence of both phases. An additional broad peak is observed at 20° which arises due to the background noise appearing for a thin sample layer. This is demonstrated by the top red curve, which corresponds to the same measurement performed on a thinner sample. A detailed structural analysis is performed on a Cs4PbBr6 NC, to identify its crystal symmetry. By taking a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of a selected region in an atomic resolution image, the lattice periodicity, i.e. the diffractogram, of a crystalline structure is revealed. Figure 1e shows an atomic resolution STEM image of a single Cs4PbBr6 NC. The lattice periodicity can be clearly seen. Although the individual atoms are not resolved due to the slight deviation from its zone axis, the lattice information can still be identified from the diffraction pattern (Figures 1f and g). Two diffraction spots are indicated which are identified as the (-4 1 1) and (-2 1 0) planes with an intersection angle of 19.5°, corresponding to a lattice distance of 3.33 Å and 7.06 Å, respectively. Using the experimentally obtained zone axis, the modeled atomic arrangement (Figure 1h) is shown to agree well with the experimental data: the ‘rows’ of Cs atoms can be clearly seen in Figure 2a, identifying it as a pure Cs4PbBr6 NC (see also Figure S4). 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 1. Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 NCs and their chemical and structural characterization. (a,b) ADF images of the samples prepared at 160 °C and 100 °C, respectively, where for the latter the



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 25

nanohexagons dominate, where this is reversed for the higher synthesis temperature. (c) EDS spectra of the samples as indicated in a and b. Mainly Cs, Pb and Br are detected, where the Au signal comes from the reflection of the TEM grid. The ratio between Cs and Pb is found to be 1.2:1 and 4:1 for the samples synthesized at 160 °C and 100 °C respectively (as determined from integrating the signal at the associated energy region). (d) X-ray diffraction pattern of the sample prepared at 100 °C, drop-casted on a glass substrate. The peaks related to the Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 structures are denoted as ‘a’ and ‘b’ respectively. The broad peak around 20° is due to background noise, which is only amplified as the sample layer becomes thinner, as represented by the exemplary spectrum shown on top (red curve). (e) Atomic resolution STEM image of a Cs4PbBr6 NC. (f,g) Diffraction pattern of (e) obtained by taking a Fast Fourier Transform of the shown region. Two diffraction spots in this zone axis are identified to be the (-4 1 1) and (-2 1 0) planes, with an intersection angle of 19.5°, which corresponds to a lattice distance of 3.33 Å and 7.06 Å, respectively. (h) Modeled atomic arrangement using the experimentally determined zone axis, which agrees with the Cs4PbBr6 structure. To best distinguish between the Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 phases and their different electronic structure, single NCs of both compounds are investigated by low-loss EELS. The NPs are exposed to an electron beam, in which the electrons have a certain range of kinetic energies. The electrons (can) undergo inelastic scattering and the loss of electrons is determined. In a low-loss EEL spectrum, a characteristic onset will appear if an electron in a NC is excited from the top of the valence band to the conduction band, followed by a steady increase of the signal. This directly corresponds to bandto-band absorption which starts at the bandgap energy and whose magnitude grows as the density of states increases with energy.52 Therefore this can be regarded as an analogy to absorption spectroscopy. Figure 2a shows the EEL spectra for the probed NPs (solid lines) with the first derivative shown underneath (dotted lines) where its maximum determines the bandgap energy (see SI for further details). We find a value of 2.45 eV for the CsPbBr3 nanocube (red). In contrast, for the Cs4PbBr6 NC no characteristic step is revealed since Cs4PbBr6 is an insulator with a large and 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


indirect bandgap, hence the lack of an excitonic feature (see also Figure S5). Two distinctive absorption peaks at 4 and 5.5 eV are observed which are absent for the nanocube. More interestingly is the nanosphere, for which its EEL spectrum shows characteristics of both phases: an excitonic line as well as the two absorption bands in the UV (Figure 2b, green spectrum). Upon analysis of its crystal symmetry and structure, we confirm the nanospheres are formed by a hybridization of the Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 phase. This is further demonstrated by combining the experimentally obtained EEL spectra of the nanocube and the nanohexagon, hence obtaining a simulated spectrum (orange trace in Figure 2b) which equals the experimentally measured one. The preservation of the onset in the band structure and the characteristic absorption peaks in the UV indicate there is a phase segregation inside a single NC i.e., the two phases are independent of each other’s presence but co-grow to form a single NC. It has been shown that Cs4PbBr6 NCs can be converted into cubic CsPbBr3 NCs by their reaction with excess PbBr2.44 This indicates that the spherical NCs represent indeed an intermediate state between the Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 phases.

Figure 2. Energy bandgap and structure. (a) Valence-loss EEL spectra representing the absorption of a CsPbBr3 nanocube (red) and a Cs4PbBr6 NC (blue), appearing in the same sample (160 °C). The bandgap energy of the nanocube (2.45 eV) is determined from the peak of the first derivative of the 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 25

EEL spectrum, that appears due to the abrupt onset in absorption (indicated by the dotted lines). No onset is observed for the Cs4PbBr6 NC which is an insulator with a large bandgap energy of 4 eV. (b) Valence-loss EEL spectrum of a spherical nanocrystal (green) observed in the same sample, formed upon the hybridization of a nanocube and a nanohexagon. The latter process is represented by the simulated EEL spectrum (orange) which is obtained from adding the experimentally obtained spectra of the nanohexagon and nanocube as shown in a. The hybrid has, as expected, a bandgap energy similar to that of the nanocube.

The identified band structures of the investigated single NPs are compared with the ensemble optical characteristics. Figure 3 shows the PL (solid lines) and normalized absorption (dotted lines) spectra of the samples synthesized at 100 °C (top) and 160 °C (bottom), excited at Eexc = 2.88 eV. The narrow PL bands centered around 2.45 eV and 2.53 eV for the two investigated (as prepared) samples agree with CsPbBr3 NC emission, consistent with smaller and larger NC sizes for lower and higher synthesis temperatures, respectively.18 An additional PL peak at 2.4 eV is observed for sample synthesized at 100 °C, when diluted. This arises from disintegration and clustering of the NCs as ligands are removed upon dilution due to their dynamic bonding on the NCs surface,53 which causes the PL to redshift towards the CsPbBr3 bulk value (2.33 eV). We do not observe emission from the Cs4PbBr6 NCs in the range from 3 – 4 eV which was recorded for Eexc = 4.13 eV (above the absorption band of Cs4PbBr6). In fact, we observe no significant change in the PL spectra when excited at 2.88 eV and 4.13 eV (see Figure S6) as they are almost identical. Therefore the visible emission at 2.4 – 2.6 eV originates solely from the CsPbBr3 phase. We do observe a small redshift with decreasing excitation energy, which is explained by reabsorption and/or a residual energy transfer upon selective excitation of the NC ensemble, as a transfer always proceeds from small to large NCs.54 All the PL bands show in the range between 2.4 – 2.5 eV, a small Stokes shift from their corresponding absorption spectra that exhibit (a) clear excitonic peak(s) at the respective onset(s), as is typically observed for CsPbBr3 NCs. In addition, a distinct absorption peak at ~3.8 eV is observed 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


for the sample containing mostly Cs4PbBr6 NCs, in agreement with our result from EELS and with what is reported for Cs4PbBr6 NCs, large single crystals and thin films.38,39,44,55

Figure 3. Photoluminescence and absorption spectra of the ensembles. PL (solid lines) and absorption (dotted lines) spectra of the samples synthesized at 100 °C (top panel) and 160 °C (bottom panel) with different concentrations, excited at Eexc = 2.88 eV. The PL peaks at 2.45 eV and 2.53 eV correspond to CsPbBr3 NC emission, for small and large NC sizes respectively, which agree with the high and lower synthesis temperature. For the (diluted) samples synthesized at 100 °C, an additional PL peak around 2.4 eV is observed, which appears due to disintegration and clustering of the CsPbBr3 NCs due to removal of the ligands upon dilution, causing the PL to redshift towards the CsPbBr3 bulk value. For the 100 °C sample, a clear absorption peak is observed around 3.8 eV, which agrees with values reported for Cs4PbBr6.36,38,39,55 No emission from the Cs4PbBr6 NCs is observed in the UV around 3 – 4 eV (for Eexc = 4.13 eV).



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 25

DISCUSSION Since the spherical NCs appear in our STEM measurements often slightly cubic and/or as hexagons with rounded corners, their optical ensemble characteristics could be erroneously attributed to (pure) CsPbBr3 or Cs4PbBr6 NCs. Recent reports on the synthesis of single crystals, assign the ~520 nm (2.38 eV) and the ~550 nm (2.25 eV) emission bands to Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 respectively,40-42 although it is also reported that confined CsPbBr3 quantum dots could contribute.40,43 On the other hand, M. Nikl et al.38 also studied the emission characteristics of Cs4PbBr6 crystals and thin films, and show absorption features at 520 nm and the same green emission around 545 nm, ascribing it to the CsPbBr3-like phase being present in the bulk Cs4PbBr6 sample. The optical transitions of both CsPbX3 and Cs4PbX6 crystals is explained as being related to transitions between states of the Pb2+ ion (which form regular octahedra that define the perovskite structure). Cs4PbBr6 itself is said to have absorption peaks at 220 nm (5.6 eV) and 310 nm (4 eV). These observations, specifically with respect to the green emission, are to some extent in contrast with each and clarification is needed. Preparing pure Cs4PbBr6 or CsPbBr3 NCs in ensembles proves challenging as the co-formation of the two phases (i) requires extra-care during synthesis, and (ii) can easily escape detection due to the large bandgap of Cs4PbBr6. Hence, ensemble characterization cannot provide the ability to fully distinguish between their optical and at the same time structural properties. This, on the other hand is fully accomplished by single particle EELS. We observe that the energy structure of a single pure Cs4PbBr6 NC has large bandgap featuring no absorption in the visible/near UV (~2 – 3.5 eV). This excludes the possibility of emission in that energy range, conclusively resolving the current dispute.38,40-44 Distinct absorption bands are observed at 4 and 5.5 eV - in full agreement with the work of M. Nikl et al. It is the CsPbBr3-phase within the hybridized Cs4PbBr6/CsPbBr3 spherical NCs that is responsible for the visible PL as an excitonic feature is clearly identified in its EEL spectrum. Furthermore, even if the ensemble is excited below the 4 eV absorption peak of Cs4PbBr6, the green emission is still observed.


Page 13 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


CONCLUSION In conclusion, we have analyzed single pure Cs4PbBr6 NCs and demonstrated that they only absorb in the UV, manifesting itself as two distinct peaks at 4 and 5.5 eV. We have identified and characterized CsPbBr3/Cs4PbBr6 hybridized spherical NCs which preserve the optical characteristics of both parent materials: they show a strong green emission at 2.45 eV and the absorption bands in the UV, resulting from the CsPbBr3 and Cs4PbBr6 phases respectively. In particular, our method demonstrates the advantage of particle-by-particle EELS analysis over macroscopic optical ensemble measurements, which is critical if a specimen is a composition of different NPs. The nanospheres together with CsPbBr3 nanocubes and Cs4PbBr6 nanohexagons are appearing during the commonly used colloidal synthesis of all-inorganic perovskite NCs. Lowering the synthesis temperature steers the reaction towards the formation of mostly Cs4PbBr6 NCs.

Associated Content Supporting Information The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: …. Content: chemicals, synthesis, determination of the bandgap energy, additional figures: Co-existence of hexagonal Cs4PbBr6 and cubic CsPbBr3 NCs, sample synthesized at 160 °C. (figure S1); CsPbBr3 nanowires, sample synthesized at 160 °C (Figure S2); Cs4PbBr6 nanoparticles, sample synthesized at 100 °C (Figure S3); Simulations and TEM image of the Cs4PbBr6 composition (Figure S4); Band structure simulations (Figure S5); Excitation dependent (normalized) PL spectra for the sample synthesized at 100 °C (Figure S6).

Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Stefania Grecea and Andreea Gheorghe for their assistance with the X-ray diffraction experiments. J.L. and K.S. acknowledge JST-ACCEL and JSPS KAKENHI (JP16H06333 and P16823); and C.W., L.G. and T.G. acknowledge Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 25

Onderzoek (NWO) and Technologiestichting STW, for financial support. Y.F. and T.G. thank Osaka University for International Joint Research Promotion Program.

Author Information Corresponding Authors Correspondence should be directed to [email protected] or [email protected] Author Contributions C.W. and J.L. contributed equally. K.S., T.G., Y.F. and J.L. conceived the project and designed the experiments. L.G. synthesized the samples. J.L. performed the LL-EELS measurements and analyzed the data. C.W. performed the optical spectroscopy measurements and analyzed the data. All authors discussed the results and their interpretation. C.W., J.L and L.G. co-wrote the manuscript with contributions from K.S. and T.G. who also co-supervised the project. References (1) Alivisatos, A. P. Perspectives on the physical chemistry of semiconductor nanocrystals. J. Phys.

Chem. 1996, 100, 13226–13239. (2) Lim. X. The nanolight revolution is coming. Nature 2016, 531, 26–28. (3) Murray, C. B.; Kagan, C. R.; Bawendi, M. G. Synthesis and characterization of monodisperse nanocrystals and close-packed nanocrystal assemblies. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 2010, 30, 545– 610. (4) Alivisatos, A. P. Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science 1996, 271, 933–937. (5) Efros, A. L.; Efros, A. L. Interband absorption of light in a semiconductor sphere. Sov. Phys.

Semicond. 1982, 16, 772–775. (6) Nirmal, M.; Brus, L. Luminescence photophysics in semiconductor nanocrystals. Accounts

Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 407–414.


Page 15 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(7) Gurevich, L.; Canali, L.; Kouwenhoven, L. P. International Symposium on Quantum Confinement (6th: 2001 : San Fransisco, Calif.), Cahay, M; Electrochemical Society (U.S.) Quantum

confinement VI: nanostructured materials and devices: proceedings of the international symposium. Electrochemical Society, Pennington, N.J., 2001. (8) Bawendi, M. G.; Steigerwald, M. L.; Brus, L. E. The quantum mechanics of larger semiconductor clusters (" quantum dots"). Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1990, 41, 477–496. (9) Ishihara, T. Optical properties of Pb-based inorganic-organic perovskites, World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd. 1995, Vol.1. (10) Kazim, S.; Nazeeruddin , M. K.; Grätzel, M.; S. Ahmad. Perovskite as light harvester: a game changer in photovoltaics. Angew. Chem. 2014, 53, 2812-2824. (11) Sum , T. C.; Mathews, N. Advancements in perovskite solar cells: photophysics behind the photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2518–2534. (12) Green, M. A.; Ho-Baillie, A.; Snaith, H. J. The emergence of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photon. 2014, 8, 506-514. (13) Park, N-G. Organometal perovskite light absorbers toward a 20% efficiency low-cost solid-state mesoscopic solar cell. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 2423-2429. (14) Gratzel, M. The light and shade of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 838-842. (15) Fu, Y.; Meng, F.; Rowley, M. B.; Thompson, B. J.; Shearer, M. J.; Ma, D.; Hamers, R. J.; Wright, J. C.; Jin, S. J. Solution growth of single crystal methylammonium lead halide perovskite nanostructures for optoelectronic and photovoltaic applications. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5810-5818. (16) Kim, H. S.; Lee, C. R.; Im, J. H.; Lee, K.B.; Moehl, T.; Marchioro, A.; Moon, S. J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Yum, J. H.; Moser, J. E.; Grätzel, M. Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all-solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 591.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 25

(17) Xiao, M.; Huang, F.; Huang, W.; Dkhissi, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Etheridge, J.; Gray-Weale, A.; Bach, U.; Cheng, Y. B. ; Spiccia, L. A fast deposition-crystallization procedure for highly efficient lead iodide perovskite thin-film solar cells. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 10056-10061. (18) Protesescu, L.; Yakunin, S.; Bodnarchuk, M. I.; Krieg, F.; Caputo, R.; Hendon, C. H.; Yang, R. X.; Walsh, A.; Kovalenko, M. V. Nanocrystals of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X= Cl, Br, and I): novel optoelectronic materials showing bright emission with wide color gamut. Nano

Lett. 2015, 15, 3692–3696. (19) Lignos, I.; Stavrakis, S.; Nedelcu, G.; Protesescu, L.; deMello, A. J.; Kovalenko, M. V. Synthesis of cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals in a droplet-based microfluidic platform: fast parametric space mapping. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 1869–1877. (20) Nedelcu, G.; Protesescu, L.; Yakunin, S.; Bodnarchuk, M. I.; Grotevent, M. J.; Kovalenko, M. V. Fast anion-exchange in highly luminescent nanocrystals of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X= Cl, Br, I). Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 5635–5640. (21) Swarnkar, A.; Chulliyil, R.; Ravi, V. K.; Irfanullah, M.; Chowdhury, A.; Nag, A. Colloidal CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals: luminescence beyond traditional quantum dots. Angew. Chem. 2015,

54, 15424–15428. (22) Akkerman, Q. A.; D’Innocenzo, V.; Accornero, S.; Scarpellini, A.; Petrozza, A.; Prato, M.; Manna, L. Tuning the optical properties of cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals by anion exchange reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10276–10281. (23) Sun, S.; Yuan, D.; Xu , Y.; Wang, A.; Deng, Z. Ligand-mediated synthesis of shape-controlled cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals via reprecipitation process at room temperature.

ACS Nano 2016, 10, 3648–3657. (24) Eaton, S. W.; Lai, M.; Gibson, N. A.; Wong, A. B.; Dou, L.; Ma, J.; Wang, L. W.; Leone, S. R.; Yang, P. Lasing in robust cesium lead halide perovskite nanowires. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 1993-1998.


Page 17 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(25) Zhang, D.; Eaton, S.; Yu, W.; Dou, Y. L.; Yang, P. Solution-phase synthesis of cesium lead halide perovskite nanowires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9230-9233. (26) Fu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Ding, Q.; Wang, J.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Zhu, X.; Jin, S. Broad wavelength tunable robust lasing from single-crystal nanowires of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X= Cl, Br, I). ACS Nano, 2016, 10, 7963-7972. (27) Tang, X., Zu, Z., Shao, H., Hu, W., Zhou, M., Deng, M., Chen, W., Zang, Z., Zhu, T. and Xue, J. Allinorganic perovskite CsPb (Br/I) 3 nanorods for optoelectronic application. Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 15158-15161. (28) Bekenstein, Y.; Koscher, B. A.; Eaton, S. W.; Yang, P.; Alivisatos, A. P. Highly luminescent colloidal nanoplates of perovskite cesium lead halide and their oriented assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 16008-16011. (29) Akkerman, Q. A.; Motti, S. G.; Srimath Kandada, A. R.; Mosconi, E.; D’Innocenzo, V.; Bertoni, G.; Marras, S.; Kamino, B. A.; Miranda, L.; De Angelis, F.; Petrozza, A.; Prato, M.; Manna, L. Solution synthesis approach to colloidal lesium lead halide perovskite nanoplatelets with monolayerlevel thickness control. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1010-1016. (30) Gomez, L.; de Weerd, C.; Hueso, J.L.; Gregorkiewicz, T. Color-stable water-dispersed cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 631-636. (31) Sakata, M.; Nishiwaki, T.; Harada, J. Neutron diffraction study of the structure of cubic CsPbBr3. Jour. Phy. Soc. Jpn 1979, 47, 232-233. (32) Sharma, S.; Weiden, N.; Weiss, A. Phase Diagrams of Quasibinary Systems of the Type: ABX3—A′ BX3; ABX3—AB′ X3, and ABX3—ABX′ 3; X= Halogen. Z. Phys. Chem. 1992, 175, 63-80. doi: 10.1524/zpch.1992.175.Part_1.063. (33) Møller, C. K. Nature 1958, 182, 1436-1436. doi:10.1038/1821436a0. (34) Bertolotti, F.; Protesescu, L.; Kovalenko, M.V.; Yakunin, S.; Cervellino, A.; Billinge, S.J.; Terban, M.W.; Pedersen, J.S.; Masciocchi, N.; Guagliardi, A., Coherent nanotwins and dynamic disorder in cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3819-3831. 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 25

(35) Cola, M.; Massarotti, V.; Riccardi, R.; Sinistri, C., Binary systems formed by lead bromide with (Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs and Tl) Br: a DTA and diffractometric study. Z. Naturforsch. A, 1971, 26, 1328-1332. (36) Somma, F., Aloe, P., Lo Mastro, S., Giampaolo, C., Nikl, M., Nitsch, K., Fabeni, P.; Pazzi, G.P., Free and localised exciton of ternary nanocrystals in CsX-PbX2 thin films (X= Cl, Br, I). Radiation

effects and defects in solids, 2001, 156, 103-107. (37) Br-Cs-Pb Vertical Section of Ternary Phase Diagram. Springer & Material Phases Data System 2016. http://materials.springer.com/isp/phase-diagram/docs/c_0202533 (38) Nikl, M.; Mihokova, E.; Nitsch, K.; Somma, F.; Giampaolo, C.; Pazzi, G.P.; Fabeni, P; Zazubovich, S. Photoluminescence of Cs4PbBr6 crystals and thin films. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 306, 280-284. (39) Kondo, S.; Amaya, K.; Saito, T. Localized optical absorption in Cs4PbBr6. J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 2002, 14, 2093. (40) Rakita, Y.; Kedem, N.; Gupta, S.; Sadhanala, A.; Kalchenko, V.; Böhm, M.L.; Kulbak, M.; Friend, R.H.; Cahen, D.; Hodes, G.; Low-temperature solution-grown CsPbBr3 gingle crystals and their characterization. Crystal Growth & Design 2016, 16, 5717-5725. (41) Saidaminov, M.I.; Almutlaq, J.; Sarmah, S.; Dursun, I.; Zhumekenov, A.A.; Begum, R.; Pan, J.; Cho, N.; Mohammed, O.F.; Bakr, O.M., Pure Cs4PbBr6: highly luminescent zero-dimensional perovskite solids. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, pp.840-845. (42) Cha, J.H.; Han, J.H.; Yin, W.; Park, C.; Park, Y.; Ahn, T.K.; Cho, J.H.; Jung, D.Y.,. Photoresponse of CsPbBr3 and Cs4PbBr6 perovskite single crystals. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 565-570. (43) Aceves, R.; Babin, V.; Flores, M. B.; Fabeni, P.; Maaroos, A.; Nikl, M.; Nitsch, K.; Pazzi, G. P.; Salas, R. P.; Sildos, I.; Zazubovich, N.; Zazubovich, S. J. Lumin. Spectroscopy of CsPbBr3 quantum dots in CsBr: Pb crystals 2001, 93, 27−41. (44) Akkerman, Q.A.; Park, S.; Radicchi, E.; Nunzi, F.; Mosconi, E.; De Angelis, F.; Brescia, R.. Rastogi, P.. Prato, M.; Manna, L. Nearly monodisperse insulator Cs4PbX6 (X= Cl, Br, I) nanocrystals, their mixed halide compositions, and their transformation into CsPbX3 nanocrystals. Nano Letters 2017, 17, 1924. 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(45) Velázquez, M.; Ferrier, A.; Péchev, S.; Gravereau, P.; Chaminade, J.P.; Portier, X.; Moncorgé, R., Growth and characterization of pure and Pr3+-doped Cs4PbBr6 crystals. J. Crystal Growth 2008, 310, 5458-5463. (46) Andrews, R.H.; Clark, S.J.; Donaldson, J.D.; Dewan, J.C.; Silver, J. Solid-state properties of materials of the type Cs 4 MX 6 (where M= Sn or Pb and X= Cl or Br). J. Chem. Soc. 1983, 4, 767770. (47) Tizei, L. H.; Lin, Y. C.; Mukai, M.; Sawada, H.; Lu, A. Y.; Li, L. J.; Kimoto, K.; Suenaga, K. Exciton Mapping at subwavelength scales in two-dimensional materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 107601. (48) Sasaki, T.; Sawada; H., Hosokawa; F., Sato, Y.; Suenaga, K. Aberration-corrected STEM/TEM imaging at 15kV. Ultramicroscopy 2014, 145, 50–55. (49) Nitsch, K.; Dušek, M.; Nikl, M.; Polak, K.; Rodova, M. Ternary alkali lead chlorides: crystal growth, crystal structure, absorption and emission properties. Prog. Crystal Growth Charact. 1995 30, 1-22. (50) Fogler, H.S. Elements of chemical reaction engineering, Prentice Hall, 1992, Vol. 218. (51) Conte, G.; Somma, F; Nikl, M. Nanocrystalline CsPbBr3 thin films: a grain boundary optoelectronic study. Phys. Status Solidi C 2005, 2, 306-309. (52) Lin, J.; Gomez, L.; de Weerd, C.; Fujiwara, Y.; Gregorkiewicz, T.; Suenaga, K.; Direct observation of band structure modifications in nanocrystals of CsPbBr3 perovskite. Nano Lett. 2016, 6, 7198–7202. (53) De Roo, J.; Ibanez, M.; Geiregat, P.; Nedelcu, G.; Walravens, W.; Maes, J.; Martins, J.C.; Van Driessche, I.; Kovalenko, M.V.; Hens, Z. Highly dynamic ligand binding and light absorption coefficient of cesium lead bromide perovskite nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 2071-2081. (54) de Weerd, C; Gomez, L; Zhang, H; Buma, W.J.; Nedelcu, G.; Kovalenko, M.V.; Gregorkiewicz, T. Energy Transfer between inorganic perovskite nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 13310– 13315. 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 25

(55) Babin, V.; Fabeni, P.; Mihokova, E.; Nikl, M.; Pazzi, G.P.; Zazubovich, N; Zazubovich, S. Luminescence of Cs4PbBr6 aggregates in as-grown and in annealed CsBr: Pb single crystals.

Phys. Status Solidi B 2000, 219, 205-214.

Notes The authors declare no competing financial interests.


Page 21 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


TOC Graphic:



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 1. Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 NCs and their chemical and structural characterization. (a,b) ADF images of the samples prepared at 160 °C and 100 °C, respectively, where for the latter the nanohexagons dominate, where this is reversed for the higher synthesis temperature. (c) EDS spectra of the samples as indicated in a and b. Mainly Cs, Pb and Br are detected, where the Au signal comes from the reflection of the TEM grid. The ratio between Cs and Pb is found to be 1.2:1 and 4:1 for the samples synthesized at 160 °C and 100 °C respectively (as determined from integrating the signal at the associated energy region). (d) X-ray diffraction pattern of the sample prepared at 100 °C, drop-casted on a glass substrate. The peaks related to the Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 structures are denoted as ‘a’ and ‘b’ respectively. The broad peak around 20° is due to background noise, which is only amplified as the sample layer becomes thinner, as represented by the exemplary spectrum shown on top (red curve). (e) Atomic resolution STEM image of a Cs4PbBr6 NC. (f,g) Diffraction pattern of (e) obtained by taking a Fast Fourier Transform of the shown region. Two diffraction spots in this zone axis are identified to be the (-4 1 1) and (-2 1 0) planes, with an intersection angle of 19.5°, which corresponds to a lattice distance of 3.33 Å and 7.06 Å, respectively. (h) Modeled

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 25

Page 23 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


atomic arrangement using the experimentally determined zone axis, which agrees with the Cs4PbBr6 structure. 254x400mm (96 x 96 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 2. Energy bandgap and structure. (a) Valence-loss EEL spectra representing the absorption of a CsPbBr3 nanocube (red) and a Cs4PbBr6 NC (blue), appearing in the same sample (160 °C). The bandgap energy of the nanocube (2.45 eV) is determined from the peak of the first derivative of the EEL spectrum, that appears due to the abrupt onset in absorption (indicated by the dotted lines). No onset is observed for the Cs4PbBr6 NC which is an insulator with a large bandgap energy of 4 eV. (b) Valence-loss EEL spectrum of a spherical nanocrystal (green) observed in the same sample, formed upon the hybridization of a nanocube and a nanohexagon. The latter process is represented by the simulated EEL spectrum (orange) which is obtained from adding the experimentally obtained spectra of the nanohexagon and nanocube as shown in a. The hybrid has, as expected, a bandgap energy similar to that of the nanocube. 254x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)


Page 24 of 25

Page 25 of 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 3. Photoluminescence and absorption spectra of the ensembles. PL (solid lines) and absorption (dotted lines) spectra of the samples synthesized at 100 °C (top panel) and 160 °C (bottom panel) with different concentrations, excited at Eexc = 2.88 eV. The PL peaks at 2.45 eV and 2.53 eV correspond to CsPbBr3 NC emission, for small and large NC sizes respectively, which agree with the high and lower synthesis temperature. For the (diluted) samples synthesized at 100 °C, an additional PL peak around 2.4 eV is observed, which appears due to disintegration and clustering of the CsPbBr3 NCs due to removal of the ligands upon dilution, causing the PL to redshift towards the CsPbBr3 bulk value. For the 100 °C sample, a clear absorption peak is observed around 3.8 eV, which agrees with values reported for Cs4PbBr6.35,37,38,52 No emission from the Cs4PbBr6 NCs is observed in the UV around 3 – 4 eV (for Eexc = 4.13 eV). 287x199mm (300 x 300 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

TOC graphic 80x46mm (272 x 292 DPI)


Page 26 of 25

Hybridization of Single Nanocrystals of Cs 4 PbBr ... - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents