Identification of major sources of atmospheric NH3 in an urban

42. (NH4)2SO4, NH4HSO4, etc., in PM2.5 (atmospheric particles with an .... During the campaign, a total of 120 soil samples at 0-1 cm and 1-2 cm depth...
1 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY

Article 3

Identification of major sources of atmospheric NH in an urban environment in northern China during wintertime Xiaolin Teng, Qingjing Hu, Leiming Zhang, Jiajia Qi, Jinhui Shi, Huan Xie, Huiwang Gao, and Xiaohong Yao Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 15 May 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 15, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Identification of major sources of atmospheric NH3 in an urban

2

environment in northern China during wintertime

3 4

Xiaolin Teng1#, Qingjing Hu2#, Leiming Zhang3*, Jiajia Qi1, Jinhui Shi1, Huan Xie1,

5

Huiwang Gao1,4 & Xiaohong Yao1,4*

6

1

7

Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

8

2

9

Agriculture, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery

Key Lab of Marine Environmental Science and Ecology, Ministry of Education,

Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Marine Fisheries Resources, Ministry of

10

Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China

11

3

12

Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada

13

4

14

China

15

# contributed equally to the work; * corresponding authors: [email protected]

16

and [email protected] (phone number: 86-532-66782565, fax number:

17

86-532-66782810)

Air quality Research Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and

Qingdao Collaborative Center of Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266100,

18 19

Abstract

20

To assess the relative contributions of traffic emission and other potential sources to

21

high-levels of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) in urban areas in wintertime, atmospheric

22

NH3 and related pollutants were measured at an urban site, ~300 m from a major

23

traffic road, in northern China in November and December 2015. Hourly average NH3

24

varied from 0.3 to 10.8 ppb with an average of 2.4 ppb during the campaign. Contrary

25

to the common perspective in literature, traffic emission was demonstrated to be a

26

negligible contributor to atmospheric NH3. Atmospheric NH3 correlated well with

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 31

27

ambient water vapor during many time periods lasting from tens of hours to several

28

days, implying NH3 released from water evaporation being an importance source.

29

Emissions from local green space inside the urban areas were identified to

30

significantly contribute to the observed atmospheric NH3 during ~60% of the

31

sampling times. Evaporation of pre-deposited NHx through wet precipitation

32

combined with emissions from local green space likely caused the spikes of

33

atmospheric NH3 mostly occurring 1-4 hours after morning rush hours or after and

34

during slight shower events. There are still ~30% of the data samples with appreciable

35

NH3 level for which major contributors are yet to be identified.

Winter urban atmospheric NH3

~30%

Unidentified local emission sources

~60%

Traffic

Green space

36

Dew or rain droplets Evaporation of pre-deposited NHx

37

Keywords: Atmospheric NH3, emission potentials of NH3, NHx deposition, vehicle

38

emission, ion chromatograph

39 40

Introduction

41

Atmospheric ammonia (NH3) and acidic gases such as SO2 and NOx are important

42

gaseous precursors forming secondary inorganic ammonium salts, e.g., NH4NO3,

43

(NH4)2SO4, NH4HSO4, etc., in PM2.5 (atmospheric particles with an aerodynamic

44

diameter smaller than 2.5 µm)1-6. It was reported that these ammonium salts

45

accounted for 40-60% of PM2.5 mass under extremely polluted conditions in China,

46

e.g., when PM2.5 mass concentrations exceeded 300 µg m-3 7-9. Large-scale severe

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

47

PM2.5 pollution events occurred frequently during wintertime in the last few years in

48

northern China. A thorough knowledge on the sources of these gaseous precursors is

49

needed for making effective emission control policies to alleviate PM2.5 pollution.

50

With decreasing emissions of SO2 and NOx in recent years in China, more attention

51

needs to be paid to NH310-13. Major contributors responsible for increasing NH3

52

mixing ratios in urban environments in China are yet to be identified14-15.

53

Agriculture emissions of NH3 are at low levels in winter due to limited agriculture

54

activities13. Thus, the relative contributions of non-agriculture emissions to

55

atmospheric NH3 become more important13-19. Three-way catalytic converters

56

equipped on on-road vehicles are commonly believed to generate NH310-29. In addition,

57

the use of urea to remove NOx in diesel plumes can be another emission source of

58

NH3 in urban atmospheres26. Some studies suggested traffic emissions as important

59

sources of NH3 in different urban atmospheres in China14-15, 25. However, our previous

60

studies reported negligible contributions from traffic emissions to atmospheric NH3 at

61

a sampling site ~190 m from a highway with the highest traffic flow (~4.0*105

62

vehicles/day) in Toronto and an urban site in downtown Toronto, Canada18, 31. Our

63

previous findings motivate us to design a study to examine the contribution of traffic

64

emissions to urban atmospheric NH3 in winter in China. To date, there is still no

65

consensus whether traffic emissions are among the major sources of urban

66

atmospheric NH3 in winter season.

67 68

In this study, a winter campaign was launched to measure hourly NH3 and other

69

supporting data in an urban environment in northern China. The objectives of the

70

present study are to 1) examine whether traffic emission is a significant contributor to

71

urban atmospheric NH3 in northern China; 2) explore major contributors of

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 31

72

atmospheric NH3 during wintertime; and 3) present implications for mitigation of

73

urban atmospheric NH3.

74

Experimental

75

The sampling site is located in an urban area in Qingdao, a city with 9 million

76

population in northern China (Fig. 1). From mid-November to the end of December

77

2015, a suite of semi-continuous and real-time instruments were used to monitor

78

atmospheric NH3, H2O vapor, and other pollutant gases such as CO2, NO, NO2, O3

79

and SO2. All instruments were housed in an air-conditioned lab at the second floor of

80

an academic building. The lab is approximately 300 m away from a major traffic road

81

with moderately heavy traffic flow, for which the counted traffic density on weekdays

82

and weekends are shown in Fig. S1. On weekday morning (07:30-08:00) and

83

afternoon (16:30-17:00) rush hours, the maximum traffic flows reached ~3300-3500

84

vehicles per hour, which were about three times of the minimum traffic from midnight

85

to early morning. On weekends, the maximum traffic decreased by approximately

86

30%. The on-site counting also showed that ~90% of the vehicle fleet consisted of

87

passenger cars and light-duty vehicles. In China, passenger cars and light-duty

88

vehicles are overwhelmingly powered by gasoline and they are enforced to equip with

89

3-way catalytic converters. When winds blow from the northwest, west and southwest,

90

the major traffic road is situated upwind of the lab.

91 92

An URG-9000D Ambient Ion Monitor - Ion Chromatograph (AIM-IC) was operating

93

at a flow rate of 3 L min-1 to semi-continuously measure atmospheric NH3 together

94

with acidic gases, anion and cation in PM2.5 at 1-hr resolution. The AIM-IC is

95

equipped with a wet denuder to absorb NH3 and acidic gases and the denuder solution

96

is injected to IC for chemical analysis. Details about AIM-IC instrument can be found

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

97

in Markovic et al.31 In this study, the ambient air was drawn through a stainless steel

98

tube in 1.2 m length and then passed through a PM2.5 sharp-cut cyclone on the

99

AIM-IC. The tube’s inlet was ~5 m above the ground level and the surrounding

100

buildings are ~15 m height. As reported32, the length of sampling line had a negligible

101

influence on the low resolution measurement of atmospheric NH3, e.g., time

102

resolution > 30 minutes. The hourly average mixing ratios of atmospheric NH3

103

measured by the AIM-IC were available only on 18-30 November, and 10-12 and

104

18-30 December 2015 while the system experienced maintenance or calibration at

105

other times.

106 107

An NH3 analyzer (NH3-H2O, Model 912-0016, LGR), a greenhouse gas analyzer

108

(CO2-CH4-CO2-H2O, Model 911-0011, LGR), and gas analyzers including NOx

109

(TECO 42C), SO2 (TECO 43CTL) and O3 (TECO 49C) were also used to

110

simultaneously measure related gases. The former two analyzers operating at 1-sec

111

resolution at a flow rate of 0.3 L min-1 were calibrated by a commercial company

112

before use. The latter three analyzers operating at 1-min resolution had a regular

113

calibration following the standard protocol (US EPA, Quality Assurance Guidance

114

Document 2.3). Teflon tubes in length of 2-4.5 m were used to connect the analyzers

115

with ambient air. Teflon filters were used to remove particles in the air upstream of the

116

analyzers. In addition, a PM2.5 sampler (Thermo Scientific™) equipped with two

117

denuders was used to measure NH3 and acidic gases and chemical species including

118

NH4+ in PM2.5 during a few days. The sampler stood at ~1.5 m above the green space

119

and was ~30 m away from the lab. The collected samples were extracted and the

120

extracts were determined by the AIM-IC operating offline. The measured mixing

121

ratios of atmospheric NH3 reflected the 24-hr average values.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 31

122

During the campaign, a total of 120 soil samples at 0-1 cm and 1-2 cm depths were

123

also collected from green spaces in surrounding areas (Fig. 1), i.e., Site A was situated

124

at the roadside green space of the major traffic road, Site B at the green space where

125

the denuder sampler stood, and Site C at the green space outside the lab (Table 1). The

126

morning and afternoon soil samples were collected at 08:30-09:30 and 13:00-14:00,

127

respectively, on each day. For each soil sample, 50 g soil was added to 50 ml

128

deionized water and then mixed for one minute. The solution was filtered into two

129

vials for measuring pH immediately and storing at 4C. After the campaign, the stored

130

solution was diluted by 10 times and the diluted solution was injected to the AIM-IC

131

operating offline to determine ionic species. In addition, more soil samples were

132

collected at two other urban green spaces and three agriculture fields across northern

133

China in January and February 2016. These samples were stored at -4C and then

134

moved to the lab using an ice box.

135 136

Soil emission potential (Γg) and canopy compensation point of NH3 (χg) of the urban

137

green space was calculated according to Nemitz et al.33: [NH+ 4 ]𝑔

138

𝛤𝑔 =

139

𝜒𝑔 = 〈

140

where [NH4+]g and [H+]g were the concentrations of NH4+ and H+ (moles per liter),

141

respectively, in the soil. Tg was the temperature of the ground soil (K). In-situ Tg was

142

not measured, and surface soil T (in the top 1-2 cm depth) usually responses rapidly to

143

changes in ambient T, i.e., within a few hours34. The ambient temperature was thus

144

used as a surrogate for Tg, knowing that this could introduce small uncertainties to the

145

calculated χg.

[H+ ]𝑔

=

[NH+ 4 ]𝑔

(1)

10−PH

161,500

10,378

𝛵𝑔

𝛵𝑔

〉 exp (−

) 𝛤𝑔 × (1.703 × 1010 )

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

(2)

6

Page 7 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

146

Meteorological data were obtained from an automatic weather station set up at the

147

building roof nearby the major traffic road (Fig. 1). During the measurement period in

148

November 2015, the automatic weather station didn’t operate properly. In the

149

November, ambient temperature recorded from a station ~2 km away from the

150

sampling site was used. The recorded ambient temperature was highly consistent with

151

the local ambient temperature (T) based on a comparison using the data collected in

152

the December, which shows Tlocal = 1.01* Tstation, and with Pearson correlation

153

coefficient (r)=0.96. Wind speed (WS) at the two locations also correlated well if

154

excluding a few outlier (accounting for 0.5% of the total data points), WSlocal = 0.66*

155

WSstation and r=0.84.

156

equation for the period of November 22-24 when measurement was not available.

157

Wind direction between the two locations was generally inconsistent under WS