In-Plane Compression and Biopolymer Permeation ... - ACS Publications

Subscriber access provided by WILFRID LAURIER UNIV

Article

In-plane compression and biopolymer permeation enable superstretchable fiber webs for thermoforming toward 3-D structures Alexey Khakalo, Jarmo Kouko, Ilari Filpponen, Elias Retulainen, and Orlando J. Rojas ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/ acssuschemeng.7b02025 • Publication Date (Web): 10 Aug 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 13, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

In-plane compression and biopolymer permeation enable super-stretchable fiber webs for thermoforming toward 3-D structures Alexey Khakalo&, Jarmo Kouko‡, Ilari Filpponen&,†*, Elias Retulainen‡, Orlando J. Rojas&,§* &

Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, Vuorimiehentie 1, FI-00076, Espoo, Finland

‡

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, P.O. Box 1603, Koivurannantie 1, FI-40101 Jyväskylä, Finland

†

Alabama Center for Paper and Bioresource Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, 212 Ross Hall, Auburn, Alabama 36849-5127, United States

§

Departments of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, 2820 Faucette Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States

*Corresponding authors: [email protected] (OJR), IF: [email protected] (IF)

ABSTRACT The typically poor ductility of cellulosic fibers and ensuing bonded networks and paper webs set a limit in any effort to produce associated three-dimensional structures without relying on chemical, often unsustainable, approaches. To address this challenge, we report on a facile and green method that combines mechanical and biopolymer treatment: in-plane compression and aqueous solution permeation via spraying. The first enabled network extensibility while the 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 36

second, which relied on the use of either food-grade gelatin, guar gum or poly(lactic acid), improved network strength and stiffness. As a result, an unprecedented elongation of ~30% was achieved after unrestrained drying of the fiber web. At the same time, the structures experienced a significant increase in tensile strength and stiffness (by ~306% and ~690%, respectively). Such simultaneous property improvement, otherwise very difficult to achieve, represent a substantial gain in material’s toughness, which results from the synergistic effects associated with the mechanical response of the network under load, fiber intrinsic strength and inter-fiber bonding. The level of plasticity developed in fiber webs upon biaxial compaction (longitudinal followed by lateral compaction), which was performed to reduce property anisotropy, allowed the synthesis of 3-D packaging materials via direct thermoforming. Moreover, the formability was found to be temperature and humidity dependent (strain and creep compliance after creep/recovery cycles in dynamic mechanical analyses). Overall, an inexpensive, green and scalable approach is introduced to expand the properties spaces for paper and related nonwovens that allows 2D and 3D formability of in-plane compacted fiber networks. Keywords: Toughness, formability, biopolymer spraying, in-plane compaction, extensibility, paper, packaging materials, 3D structures.

INTRODUCTION Increased environmental awareness has led to a growing interest in renewable and biodegradable packaging. For instance, the production of plastics alone reached 322 million metric tons in 2015, with packaging being the top market that accounted for 40% of the annual consumption. Consequently, a large volume of post-consumer plastic waste is generated as waste streams (25.8 million tonnes in 2015). From this amount, ~69% is recovered through recycling 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


and energy recovery processes while ~31% is directed to landfills.1 Therefore, it is highly desirable, if not mandatory for packaging materials that are in current use to be replaced with multifunctional alternatives, with no penalties on added costs. Moreover, a recent study from Smithers Pira, commissioned by Pro Carton indicated a resounding evidence of the importance of sustainability in packaging and highlighted folding cartons as one of the most sustainable options.2 In addition to being extremely important in a sustainable bioeconomy, cellulosic fibers represent a versatile platform for numerous modifications targeting advanced material properties. This demands the development of formability and thermoplasticity, which nowadays is of high interest not only for the paper industry but also from the perspective of materials science. Thus, thermoformable cellulose-based networks are at the center of interest, especially if they display properties that are mostly distinctive of plastics, such as high toughness. In turn, this can make paper suitable for new generation packaging materials with advanced 3D structures. The term ‘‘formability’’ describes the ability of a material to undergo plastic deformation without damage and therefore it is strongly associated with the extensibility under the processing conditions (temperature, moisture, strain rate, heat and water transfer). The main properties of fiber-based products to meet the requirements of 3-D shaping have been a subject of recent investigation by Vishtal et al.3,4 and methods to improve the respective material extensibility (formability) have been highlighted.5 In brief, extensibility of fiber networks was found to depend on three main aspects: single fiber properties, interfiber bonding (affected by the nature and composition of contact or crossing points) and the structure of the network.6 For instance, mechanical treatment of fibers was effective in improving the toughness of fiber networks,7 and an increase in extensibility and strength was achieved, by a factor of 3.2 and 2.7, respectively. A method for forming molded fiber bottles was developed in which a wet paper preform shaped

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 36

the structure. Following, a fiber slurry was applied to the mold, where moisture was eliminated through drainage channels and the container was dried by pressing a thermoplastic preform against it, using blow molding.8 Among chemical modifications, hydroxypropylation of

cellulose9 and heterogeneous partial derivatization to dialcohol cellulose10,11 have been used to develop highly ductile and thermoplastic materials. Paper for 3-D forming was obtained by application of polyelectrolyte multilayers on the surface of the fibers.12 A straightforward chemical treatment based on biopolymers was also proposed to improve formability.13,14,15 Moreover, structural modification of fiber networks via negative straining (shrinkage upon unrestrained drying) or in-plane compression (compaction and creping), are known to facilitate extensibility and ductility. In practice, the high extensibility required in paper such as those for sack and bag grades, can be achieved by compacting moist webs in the machine direction (MD). This has been performed in the drying section, at locations where the dry solids content is ~60–65%.16 For this purpose, industrial units such as the Clupak® (compaction between a moving rubber blanket, steel roll and static nip bar, see Figure 1) or Expanda® (compaction between a steel roll covered with a rubber blanket and a heated steel roll) have been used. Here, the tensile energy absorption (TEA) is increased so that the product is able withstand, without breaking, the sudden stresses involved during filling and handling.


Page 5 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 1. Principle of the Clupak® extensible unit (reprinted with permission from BioResources5). Here the paper web continuously passes through the nip between a moving rubber blanket and a rotating dryer cylinder. The rubber blanket is pressure-loaded by a static nip bar making the gap in the nip smaller than the thickness of the rubber blanket. As a result, the surface of the rubber blanket is stretched through bending over the nip bar and it is further stretched following the Venturi effect. The stretched rubber surface then comes into contact with the moist paper web. When the stressed rubber has passed through the center of the nip, the outer surface of the rubber begins to recoil due to the deceleration and bending of the rubber in the opposite direction. This forces the paper web to follow the dimensional changes of the rubber surface due to friction forces between paper and the rubber and a simultaneous slippage of the paper on the cylinder surface. Consequently, the paper is subjected to a longitudinal compressive forces without any major buckling or creping. The final compaction level can be adjusted by controlling the speed difference of the paper web between inlet and outlet of the nip,17 by varying the stretch of the rubber blanket, z-pressure exerted by a static nip bar and moisture content of the paper entering the nip. Compaction in MD induces extensive deformations like micro-creping through kinking and curling of the fibers18 and incorporation of microcompressions to fibers, all together leading to highly localized compressive strain in the fiber wall.6 The gain in paper extensibility and ensuing tensile energy adsorption are attributed to the straightening of the deformations before



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 36

the rupture under MD load of the fiber network. In addition, extensibility depends on the extension of the creases between the fiber joints upon reaching the yield point during stretching.19 Therefore, an additional benefit of compaction is the reduced axial stiffness of the fibers, which enhances the drying shrinkage.20 Most important to this investigation, however, is the fact that compaction, while an excellent solution towards extensibility, reduces the loadcarrying ability under tensile load in the MD. This is because the introduced deformations and disturbed interfiber bonding after straightening the micro-creeped structure, in other words, the stiffness and breaking strength of the web are reduced. The impairment of tensile strength and stiffness after mechanical compaction is a major factor that limits applications in packaging. Some solutions to address this issue have used different dryness of paper and z-pressure during compaction.21 However, wrinkling becomes a problem. At last, four-fold increase in tensile stiffness of compacted paper was reported upon straining (to a 75% of the maximum strain) via the strain hardening effect.22 Another approach to restore the tensile strength of compacted paper is the addition of various bio-based water dispersions. For instance, guar gum is an effective dry strength additive for paper23,24 as well as for cellulose nanofibril films.25 We reported on the use of gelatin protein to reinforce fiber networks13 and Svensson et al. improved paper strainability and relative bonded area by spreading a polylactide latex on the surfaces of the fiber.26 Moreover, tensile strength properties are known to contribute to the extensibility of the paper.6 This is especially the case when the stretch potential of deformed paper structures is fully realized and, thus, the load is evenly distributed within the network. Achieving high toughness (strain and strength) is a major challenge that needs to be addressed if cellulosic fibers are to be used in high performance packaging materials and 3-D


Page 7 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


structures. Here we propose a synergistic approach towards advanced paper formability by combining in-plane compaction and biopolymer permeation. For this purpose, a custom-made MD compaction apparatus was employed together with spraying of aqueous, food-grade biopolymers. The obtained materials were tested in humid and high temperature conditions with the press forming unit to demonstrate their excellent performance and to improve extensibility, thus allowing 3-D forming.

MATERIALS and METHODS

Materials. Bleached, once-dried softwood kraft fibers (cellulose 80%, xylan 10%, glucomannan 8% and total lignin 15 mm) by pressing with a custom-made razor blade cutter. The storage modulus (Eʹ) was determined using dynamic setup at nitrogen atmosphere (constant frequency 1 Hz, amplitude 15 µm, preload force 0.5 N, temperature range from 25 to 200°C at a heating rate of 2°C/min). Samples were conditioned at least for 1 h under nitrogen flow to attain same level of dryness before the measurement. Three parallel measurements were performed. Creep/relaxation tests were performed by applying multiple creep (stress of 5 MPa) /recovery (unstressed) cycles at multiple relative humidity levels of 10, 30, 50, 70 and 90% RH and a constant temperature of 25°C. Deformation under stress can be expressed as a change of a strain, creep and creep compliance. Creep compliance was calculated as an inverse of the modulus. The sample relaxation can be expressed as a value of recoverable compliance and the relaxation ability is given as a ratio of recovery compliance and creep compliance. Samples were conditioned at least for 2 h at each humidity level before the measurement. Two parallel measurements were carried out. Formability. Formability strain of modified fiber networks were measured using a 2-D formability tester developed by VTT, Jyväskylä (Figure 6a). This unit was equipped with a double-curved heated press, a bottom support (temperatures up to 250 °C) and blank holders. In


Page 11 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


typical experiments, a paper sample with a grammage range from 80 to 300 g/m2, was rapidly preheated to the die temperature within 0.5–0.7 s. This allowed the paper forming to occur under temperatures that were close to that of the die. The testing proceeded as follows: a paper sample (20 mm wide and ~110 mm long) was fixed by the two blank holders. The press was then moved into contact with the sample (at approximately 3% strain) and retained still for 0.5 s in order to preheat the sample. Then, the press continued a downward movement until sample failure. The velocity of the forming press was 1 mm/s. The formability strain of the samples was measured as an average value collected from 10 samples at die temperatures of 23 (room temperature), 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 °C. Prior to testing, the samples were conditioned at 75% RH and 23 °C. Formability strain was measured in the direction of compaction. 3-D press forming with fixed blank. Press forming process with MiniMould developed at Lappeenranta University of Technology Pilot testing line was used to prepare rectangular trays (90 x 80 x 35 mm, depth can be varied) from modified networks.27 The maximum depth of the trays was investigated with respect to proposed paper modification strategy since the material formability is justified by this criterion in the fixed blank process. Samples were prepared following the same procedure as described above with the exception that a high-grammage paper (~220 g/m2) was used and a pressing pressure of 0.7 MPa was applied during the compaction. The following forming parameters were used: pressing speed 60 mm/s, pressing force 30 kN, dwell time 600 ms, male mould temperature 22 °C, female mould temperature 120 °C and 160 °C, blank holding force 4800 kN. Prior to forming, the samples were conditioned overnight at 75% RH and 23 °C.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 36

Mechanical performance of paper after in-plane compaction. Typical stress–strain curves of the networks modified by in-plane compaction are presented in Figure 2, including measurement in both the machine (compaction) (MD) and cross-machine (CD) directions. Note: only randomly oriented papers from a laboratory sheet former were used and therefore MD and CD refer here to the direction of compaction, i.e., they are not to be confused with the dominant direction of the fibers in the paper network. The most relevant mechanical properties are reported in Table 1 where untreated (non-compacted) reference paper is included for evaluation. To facilitate comparisons, some data were normalized by using the apparent density, i.e., presented as indexed values (tensile, TEA and stiffness indices). The extent of compaction was followed by shrinkage measurements. The narrow standard deviations associated with the shrinkage values indicate a good reproducibility of this method and also demonstrate the repeatability of the inplane compaction process.


Page 13 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 2. Top: Compaction device shown in operation in the strained (a) and non-strained (b) positions. Bottom: Stress–strain curves of compacted paper in MD (c) and CD (d). 2X: compaction was performed twice; 1+1: biaxial compaction was performed, first in MD followed by compaction in CD; 45°: mechanical properties measured at 45° relative to the direction of compaction. Note the different scales on the horizontal X-axes for the strain. As it is apparent from Figure 2, application of in-plane compaction increased the MD strain while the strength and stiffness indices were reduced. Typically, a 10% gain in MD strain is associated with 1-2% increase in CD strain.28,29 Therefore, it was somewhat surprising to obtain a reduction in CD strain after the MD compaction and slight shrinking of the sample (Table 1). This may be associated with the alignment of induced deformations. Moreover, compaction may have facilitated a partial bond disruption, which in turn oriented, at least partially, the fibers towards the lateral direction of the compaction. Drying likely improved the bonding between the oriented fibers, as can be concluded from the higher strength and stiffness values measured in 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 36

CD. The increase in strain and the decrease in tensile strength index became even more pronounced when the compaction was performed twice (“Compaction 2X”). However, an expansion (negative CD shrinkage) of paper was observed after the second compaction. This may be explained by the Poisson contraction of the rubber bands used in the unit and their corresponding expansion in CD. Moreover, such treatment resulted in more profound microcreeped structure, which had a lower load-carrying ability and higher stretch potential due to the increased deformations (Figure S1, Supporting Information). This can also be concluded from the shape of the stress-strain curve, where the section of the profile that corresponds to the straightening of the micro-creeped structure30 became more pronounced, i.e., the strain-hardening decreased and the length increased. In order to favor a lower anisotropy upon compaction, the operation was performed in both directions (biaxial compaction, also referred to as “Compaction 1+1”). This approach improved the extensibility in both directions while maintaining the strength properties at satisfactory levels. It is noteworthy that the second compaction step contributed to a higher degree to the extensibility. In addition to two-directional compaction, mechanical properties were also measured at 45° relative to the direction of compaction. This was carried out in order to geometrically equalize the contributions of both MD and CD deformations. However, the extensibility from such measurement was higher only for CD.

Table 1 Mechanical properties of in-plane compacted paper. The following abbreviations are used: “Com” indicates “Compacted”; 2X refers to compaction that was performed twice; 1+1 indicates biaxial compaction, first in MD followed by compaction in CD and 45° is sued to indicate that the mechanical properties were measured at 45° relative to the direction of compaction. Sample

App.

Strain to

Shrinkage

Tensile

Tensile

TEA index

Tensile

Young’s


Page 15 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


density failure (%) (kg/m3)

Reference

554

Com Com 2X Com 1+1

444 412 405

Com Com 2X Com 1+1 Com 45°

444 412 405 469

(%)

Strength (MPa)

strength index (Nm/g)

(J/g)

stiffness index (kNm/g)

8.5 ± 0.3 4.5 ± 0.2 28.0 ± 0.9 50.4 ± 1.5 2.4 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.2 Mechanical properties in longitudinal direction (MD) 14.0 ± 1.4 11.3 ± 0.7 10.6 ± 1.4 23.8 ± 3.1 1.7 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.04 21.0 ± 0.7 17.4 ± 0.6 6.6 ± 0.5 16.1 ± 1.3 1.5 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.02 9.5 ± 1.9 4.8 ± 0.4 11.5 ± 1.0 28.4 ± 2.6 1.5 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.3 Mechanical properties in lateral direction (CD) 5.6 ± 1.2 1.6 ± 0.7 15.9 ± 2.2 35.6 ± 4.9 1.3 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.5 4.2 ± 1.1 -3.7 ± 0.6 13.7 ± 1.8 33.2 ± 4.6 0.9 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.3 10.5 ± 0.5 10.1 ± 0.4 9.9 ± 1.1 24.4 ± 2.7 1.6 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.02 7.0 ± 0.3 6.6 ± 0.3 10.4 ± 0.7 22.3 ± 1.4 0.9 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1

modulus (GPa)

1.11 ± 0.12 0.10 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.14 0.99 ± 0.22 1.09 ± 0.13 0.09 ± 0.01 0.43 ± 0.05

± values correspond to standard deviations of 10 replicates. Shrinkage denotes to the dimensional changes induced by drying shrinkage and compaction. Reference sample was moisturized to 60% dry solids content and freely dried.

The results presented thus far point to the fact that the compaction is a powerful technique to improve the extensibility of paper but, unfortunately, the strength properties were compromised. Therefore, we hypothesize that such effects can be compensated via permeation of an aqueous dispersions of biopolymers, applied either before or after compaction. This is based on the possibility that tensile strength may contribute to the extensibility of the paper if the load is more evenly distributed within the network;6 thus, it is possible that the stretch potential of deformed paper structures can be fully realized. Mechanical properties of polymer-treated, in-plane compacted paper. Polymerpermeated papers were obtained by spraying aqueous biopolymer solutions (only 4 wt.% biopolymer mass with respect to dry cellulose fibers) either on freshly prepared handsheets before wet pressing or after compaction. The results for the mechanical properties are summarized in Table 2 and the stress-strain profiles of respective samples are shown in Figure 3. Due to addition of the biopolymers, the grammage of the handsheets was slightly higher than the initial value, in the range of 75-78 g/m2. This indicates that the biopolymers were adsorbed on the fiber surfaces and were likely to fill the free volume of the web; thus it was expected that they increased the inter-fiber contact area and bonding. 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 36

Figure 3. Stress–strain curves of polymer-modified, in-plane compacted paper in MD (a) and CD (b). Reference: unmodified paper. Polylactic acid (PLA) latex and guar gum galactomannan (GG) were added by spraying before compaction. Gelatin (GEL) was introduced either before (“GEL 4% + Compaction”) or after (“Compaction + GEL 4%”) compaction. Biopolymer addition amount was 4 wt.% with respect to dry fibers. Note the different scales on the horizontal X-axes for the strain. PLA-treated samples were hot-pressed in order to activate the latex. In order to subject all samples to the same conditions used for PLA-treated systems, therefore, allowing better comparison, all the samples were hot-pressed (note: hot-pressing was found to have a negligible effect on the mechanical properties, data not shown). Activation of latex by hot pressing facilitated spreading of the latex on the fiber surface and consequently, was assumed to improve the relative bonded area in the network. In fact, the results indicated improved mechanical properties of the sample, while the structural density was not affected (Figure S2, Supporting Information). However, the effect of PLA latex on the mechanical properties of compacted paper was negligible in MD and somewhat even negative in CD (Table 2). This was likely the result of the presence of hydrophobic, preactivated PLA latex

31,32

which prevented or undermined the

formation of new bonds within the compacted fiber structure, at least if no activation (hot pressing) is applied. Therefore, it was reasonable to postulate that the mechanical properties of 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


PLA-containing compacted paper largely depended on the deformations induced during the compaction. As can be seen from Table 2, the mechanical properties in MD were almost the same as those for the compacted sample without any polymer treatment. The deterioration of the extensibility in CD can be attributed to the recovery of Poisson contraction of the rubber bands during compaction. Moreover, the disruption of paper structure, as indicated by slightly lower tensile strength, might have also contributed to the poor extensibility in CD. Guar gum (GG), on the other hand, afforded a clear improvement of the mechanical properties of the compacted paper, even in both directions. It is important to note here that the application of GG restricted the MD shrinkage of paper during in-plane compaction (10.0% versus 11.3%), suggesting that the GG-reinforced structure somewhat resisted the deformations caused by compaction. Nevertheless, as indicated in Table 2, compared to biopolymer-free systems, compaction of GG-containing paper resulted in 13% and 63% increase in MD extensibility and strength, respectively. If measured in the CD direction, the aforementioned properties improved by 23% and 31%, respectively. Compared to the control sample (compaction without biopolymer addition), in-plane compaction of gelatin-treated paper resulted in a significant improvement of the strain to failure and tensile strength, i.e. 20% and 125% increase in MD, respectively. In CD, these properties improved by 60% and 70%. Moreover, notable enhancement in stiffness, elastic modulus and TEA index were also obtained. Compared to the reference, non-compacted paper, the addition of gelatin offset the loss of tensile strength caused by in-plane compaction. The better performance of gelatin compared to GG may be explained by the lower molecular mass of the former polymer (up to 100 kDa) relative to that of GG (220 kDa).33 In addition, Z-average hydrodynamic radius of gelatin and guar gum assessed at the given conditions were 228.5 ± 4 nm and 3203.0 ± 202



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 36

nm, respectively. Thus, in addition to filling up the voids between fibers, gelatin possibly penetrated more readily into the fiber cell wall given that refining opens or expands pores of different sizes.34,35 In the case of GG, cellulose-guar gum interactions are known to be mainly governed by hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl groups on the cellulose chain and polar groups on the polysaccharide, which is manifested by similar conformations of the mannose backbone in GG and glucose in cellulose.36,37 In contrast, in the case of gelatin, besides H-bonding, electrostatic and other non-specific interactions are involved in cellulose-gelatin complex formation, due to the amphoteric nature of gelatin.13 An additional benefit of using water-soluble biopolymers stems from bonding upon drying (compaction was performed at 60% dry fiber content). Therefore, an attempt was made to further reinforce the compacted paper structure, i.e., by introducing gelatin after compaction (sample “Compaction + Gel”). Table 2 indicates that application of gelatin onto in-plane compacted structures further improved the mechanical properties, both in MD and CD (Figure 3). This is already a remarkable result but even more impressive is the increase in paper tensile stiffness when compared to that of the control sample (compaction without biopolymer addition). Improvements of 690% in MD and 50% in CD were noted, respectively. It should be noted that the tensile stiffness, which contributes to the bending stiffness, is a desired property in packaging materials. However, strain to failure in this case improved only slightly, which could be related to a more limited extent of compaction (8.3% vs. 11.3%) associated with this approach. In order to better understand the behavior of the system, additional efforts were carried out using a different sequence of protein addition. At first, compacted paper with dry solids content of ~60% was sprayed with gelatin solution (4 wt.% with respect to dry cellulose fibers) which


Page 19 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


further lowered the paper dry solids content. Afterwards, the sprayed structure was wet-pressed in order to facilitate the bonding between gelatin and fibers. It was hypothesized that the deformations induced by compaction were partly diminished during the wet pressing, leading to a lower shrinkage. Therefore, the underpinning assumption was that a significant toughness could be achieved by designing a methodology that eliminated the structural deformations during pressing, which was realized in this work. Table 2. Mechanical properties of in-plane compacted paper treated with 4 wt.% of bio-based aqueous dispersions (the abbreviation “Com” is used to indicate “Compacted”). Polylactic acid (PLA) latex and guar gum galactomannan (GG) were added by spraying before compaction. Gelatin (Gel) was introduced either before (“Gel + Com”) or after (“Com + Gel”) compaction. Biopolymer addition amounted to 4 wt.% with respect to dry fibers. Sample

Compaction PLA + Com GG + Com Gel + Com Com + Gel

Apparent Strain to density failure (kg/m3) (%)

444 541 479 498 640

14.0 ± 1.4 14.6 ± 0.5 15.9 ± 1.5 16.7 ± 0.9 14.6 ± 0.8

Shrinkage (%)

Tensile Strength (MPa)

Tensile TEA Tensile strength index stiffness index (J/g) index (Nm/g) (kNm/g) Mechanical properties in longitudinal direction (MD) 11.3 ± 1.1 10.6 ± 1.4 23.8 ± 3.1 1.7 ± 0.2 10.9 ± 0.6 12.4 ± 0.8 22.8 ± 1.6 1.7 ± 0.1 10.0 ± 1.2 18.7 ± 1.8 38.9 ± 3.8 3.4 ± 0.5 9.7 ± 0.9 26.7 ± 2.2 53.6 ± 4.3 4.3 ± 0.4 8.3 ± 0.8 43.1 ± 2.4 67.3 ± 3.7 5.4 ± 0.4 Mechanical properties in lateral direction (CD) 1.6 ± 0.7 15.9 ± 2.2 35.6 ± 4.9 1.3 ± 0.3 -0.5 ± 0.3 17.9 ± 1.1 33.8 ± 2.1 1.1 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.5 24.6 ± 2.8 46.6 ± 4.4 2.0 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.6 29.6 ± 2.8 59.7 ± 4.7 3.1 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.3 52.2 ± 3.2 81.1 ± 4.9 3.8 ± 0.2

0.22 ± 0.04 0.43 ± 0.06 0.53 ± 0.17 0.63 ± 0.15 1.74 ± 0.33

Young’s modulus (GPa)

0.10 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.03 0.25 ± 0.08 0.32 ± 0.07 1.11 ± 0.21

5.6 ± 1.2 2.22 ± 0.49 0.99 ± 0.22 Compaction 444 4.9 ± 0.4 3.00 ± 0.10 1.63 ± 0.06 PLA + Com 541 6.9 ± 0.9 2.2 ± 0.23 1.16 ± 0.12 GG + Com 479 8.9 ± 1.1 2.24 ± 0.54 1.11 ± 0.27 Gel + Com 498 8.3 ± 0.5 3.40 ± 0.46 2.19 ± 0.29 Com + Gel 640 ± values correspond to standard deviations from 10 replicates. Shrinkage denotes to the dimensional changes induced by the drying shrinkage and compaction. Reference sample was moisturized to 60% dry solids content and freely dried.

The results presented thus far point out that the in-plane compaction of paper in combination with the biopolymer permeation (proteins, polysaccharides, etc.) improved the stiffness and strength of compacted paper. Moreover, biopolymer permeation contributed to an improved paper extensibility. By varying the sequence used for polymer addition, it was possible to modify



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 36

the tension behavior of the modified structures since bonds that were created during drying were strained first upon loading. Therefore, the combination of in-plane compaction and biopolymer treatment were carried out in two different ways: 1) Polymer addition before compaction (wet end, spray on wet paper, etc.), which increased the stiffness at the latter part of the stress-strain curve. The bonds that were created before the compaction were loaded when the compressed zones of fibers/paper were straightened out, i.e. close to the fracture of the sample. 2) Compaction followed by polymer addition (e.g. spraying on wet paper, etc.) that stiffened and reinforced the compacted paper structure, such that the bonds were strong and stiff. Therefore, the elastic modulus and tensile stiffness, which were measured at the beginning of the tensile test, were found to increase (the first part of stress-strain curve). After the bond stretching, the straightening of the compacted paper structure was initiated. Overall, it is possible to considerably modify the mechanical behavior of fiber networks by optimizing the mechanical and polymer treatments in the wet-end or in the drying section. Effects of humidity and temperature on the mechanical properties of biopolymermodified, in-plane compacted paper. To investigate the potential for thermoforming, both dynamic and static DMA experiments were conducted in order to monitor the structural response of modified networks to temperature and humidity. The storage modulus profiles as a function of temperature for dry papers are presented in Figure 4. The storage modulus indicates the material’s ability to store energy and also reflects its stiffness. Paper that has been compacted by traditional methods (Clupak™) has been reported to display a ~2.5 times lower stiffness compared to that of the unmodified reference paper.30 As illustrated in Figure 4, PLA-containing sample, tested at room temperature, displayed a high storage modulus, which significantly decreased upon heating. This can be associated with the glass transition temperature of PLA (55-


Page 21 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


65 °C). Moreover, at high temperatures (> 100°C), when the PLA was softened, the storage modulus was found to be even lower than that of the compacted, control sample. This suggests that the interactions between cellulose and PLA were severely affected at high temperatures. Therefore, in order to improve material stability, an interfacial modification was attempted as a way to restrict the motion of PLA chains. It is evident from Figure 4 that GG-modified paper displayed approximately 25% higher storage modulus (compared to compacted sample, without biopolymer addition), which was likely due to enhanced interactions between cellulose and GG, within whole temperature range. Upon gelatin modification, the storage modulus of compacted papers increased significantly, which can be attributed to the pronounced reinforcing action of gelatin. The temperature-dependent storage modulus of polymer-treated, in-plane compacted papers measured at 50% and 75% RH are shown in the Figures S3a and S3b of Supporting Information, respectively. In general, the storage modulus of paper in humid environment followed the same tendency as that measured in dry conditions, i.e., gelatin-modified papers displayed significantly higher values than the reference, PLA- and GG-modified papers.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 22 of 36

Figure 4. Storage modulus of biopolymer-treated, in-plane compacted networks measured under nitrogen atmosphere. Polylactic acid (PLA) latex and guar gum galactomannan (GG) were added by spraying before compaction. Gelatin (GEL) was introduced either before (“GEL 4% + Compaction”) or after (“Compaction + GEL 4%”) compaction. Biopolymer addition amount was 4 wt.% with respect to dry fibers. Effect of humidity on strain and creep compliance. 3-D forming is a process where the materials simultaneously undergo multiple external stresses (load, temperature, moisture), which in turn alter the original physical-mechanical properties and affect the product deformation. Deformation under stress can be monitored as changes in strain and creep compliance, which is related to the sample’s readiness to change its shape, a feature that is highly beneficial for thermoforming and can be calculated as an inverse of the modulus.38 DMA creep experiments were performed to further investigate the effect of humidity on the mechanical properties of modified papers. Figure 5a illustrates the creep/recovery cycles of compacted and gelatinmodified compacted networks. It can be seen that the deformation of compacted paper was more pronounced (higher strain) at low humidity, which indicates that the material was more susceptible to the applied stress than the gelatin-containing sample. Compared to the gelatinmodified and compacted paper, the compacted paper exhibited about 190% higher creep compliance (Table 3).


Page 23 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 5. Strain of compacted and gelatin-modified, compacted paper after multiple creep/recovery cycles (5×120 min cycles with stress of 5 MPa and 60 min of creep recovery), with a dynamic change of humidity from 10 to 90% RH and a constant temperature of 25°C (a). The relative changes in storage modulus of biopolymer treated, in-plane compacted papers as a function of increased humidity measured at 25°C (b). Moreover, the relaxation ability (calculated as the ratio of recovery and creep compliance) of samples during five creep cycles was assessed. The maximum value for the relaxation ability was unity. The obtained data indicated that, compared to the compacted paper (without gelatin), the gelatin-modified structure, after 60 min relaxation, had approximately 22% lower relaxation ability. Moreover, the application of gelatin resulted in roughly three-fold increase in MD stiffness and elastic modulus (Table 2), which in turn may have restricted the sample’s deformability under the applied stress of 5 MPa. This explains the higher strain recoveries observed for the gelatin-modified samples. Moreover, it is known that gelatin chains are prone to partially recover the original triple-helix structure of collagen upon cooling, through a sol-gel transition. Thus, it is possible that gelatin formed a group of physically interconnected triple helices, which were brought together as fibrillar structures by intermolecular hydrogen bonding.39 Incorporation of gelatin’s fibrillar structures on the compacted paper may have also increased the relaxation ability of gelatin-modified, compacted paper.

Table 3. Creep properties of compacted paper in the presence and absence of gelatin after multiple creep/recovery cycles (5×120 min cycles with stress of 5 MPa and 60 min of creep recovery) as a function of dynamic changes of humidity, from 10 to 90% RH and a constant temperature of 25 °C. Property

Cycle 1 at RH 10%

Cycle 2 at RH 30%

Cycle 3 at RH 50% Compaction

Cycle 4 at RH 70%

Cycle 5 at RH 90%



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Creep compliance (µm2/N) Recoverable compliance (µm2/N) Relaxation ability Strain (%) Strain recovery (%) Creep (%)

Page 24 of 36

6826

4825

5559

8506

12388

2171

2034

1941

1796

1800

0.32 4.12 31.81 86.33

0.42 2.85 42.15 137.9

0.35 0.21 3.23 4.80 34.92 21.12 194.2 296.7 Gel 4% + Compaction 2787 4008 8860

0.15 6.65 14.53 129.4 16755

1397

1574

1877

2109

0.50 1.54 50.11 164.1

0.39 2.19 39.27 247.1

0.21 4.69 21.18 441.3

0.13 8.34 12.59 158.1

Creep compliance 2365 (µm2/N) Recoverable 1270 compliance (µm2/N) Relaxation ability 0.54 Strain (%) 1.32 Strain recovery (%) 53.69 Creep (%) 124.6 Standard deviation is less than 5%.

Upon increasing the RH to 30%, the deformability of the in-plane compacted paper was significantly decreased. This may be due to the water-induced plasticization of cellulose, which increased the fiber flexibility and therefore released the tension exerted during the first creep cycle. The onset of the declining ability to recover the original strain of gelatin-modified, compacted paper occurred at a relative humidity of 50%. It can be seen that the relaxation ability of both samples after four creep/recovery cycles was comparable. Furthermore, at 90% relative humidity, creep compliance and strain of gelatin-modified, compacted paper reached the maximum values, 16755 µm2/N and 8.3%, which exceeded those recorded for the compacted paper. Improved deformation of gelatin-containing samples at elevated RH might be explained by the formation of strong interactions between the gelatin and cellulose. Moreover, the relative change in storage modulus, as shown in Figure 5b, indicated that the gelatin-modified paper exhibited a smaller loss in relative modulus when subjected to a stepwise change in relative humidity, from 30% RH to 90% RH (Figure S4 of Supporting Information includes the values of the storage modulus). One possible explanation for these observations is that the penetration of 24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 25 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


water molecules was hindered by the hydrophobic residues of gelatin, which led to relatively stable gelatin-cellulose interactions, even at high humidity. The highest creep of 441 % was measured at 75% RH for gelatin-modified, in-plane compacted paper. 2D formability of biopolymer-modified, in-plane compacted samples. A 2-D formability unit was employed to simulate the process conditions of thermoforming. The formability strains of modified paper samples were examined as a function of the forming temperatures. As evident from Figure 6b, compaction was an effective strategy to improve the paper formability. A twofold increase in formability strain was observed (from ~9% to ~20%). PLA modification, however, was found to limit the formability strain of compacted paper. This may be explained by the poor interfacial adhesion between the PLA and moistened cellulose (samples were conditioned at 75% RH prior to testing). In addition, DMA trials performed at 75% RH revealed lower storage modulus for PLA-modified samples (Figure S3b, Supporting Information). Modification of compacted paper with guar gum did not improve the formability strain, which was surprising considering the previously observed impact of GG on the mechanical properties of the treated paper. This observation may be due to the moisture sensitivity of cellulose-GG interactions, which in turn promote the initiation of a fracture (Figure 6b). Interestingly, the application of gelatin significantly improved the formability strain of compacted paper; values up to three-fold higher than those of the non-compacted reference sample were recorded (from ~9% to ~27%). Such an improvement in strain may be ascribed to the gelatin-cellulose interaction, as previously discussed, and, in addition, to the fact that gelatin remained relatively stiff, regardless the water content in the sample (Figures 6b and S3b of Supporting Information). It is also worth to mention that for most of the samples, 60°C appears to be the temperature at which the maximum strain is achieved.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 26 of 36

Figure 6. Top: 2D formability tester (a) and 2D formability strain of modified papers at different temperatures (b). Reference: unmodified paper. Polylactic acid (PLA) latex, guar gum galactomannan (GG) and gelatin (GEL) were added by spraying before compaction. Biopolymer addition amount was 4 wt.% with respect to dry fibers. Samples were conditioned overnight at 75% RH. Bottom: Photo of samples manufactured by the press forming method with a fixed blank by using the sample “Gel 4% + Compaction 1+1” (c). The table shows average peak depths and corresponding material strain of produced rectangular trays as a function of different in-plane compaction methods. 2X: compaction was performed twice; 1+1: compaction was 26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


performed in both directions, first in MD followed by compaction in CD. Paper samples had a basis weight ~220 g/m2 and were conditioned overnight at 75% RH. The female mould temperature during forming was 120°C and 160°C. Standard deviation is less than 5%. 3D structures by press forming of biopolymer-modified, in-plane compacted samples. The results presented thus far indicate that in-plane compaction is an attractive strategy towards improved paper extensibility. Moreover, gelatin was found to effectively improve both the strength and the extensibility of compacted paper. Therefore, gelatin treatment was combined with paper in-plane compaction to produce advanced 3-D shapes by direct press forming, which eliminated the pre-creasing step. It was found that the paper formability in fixed blank forming processes was mainly governed by the extensibility and tensile strength of paper. Therefore, the performance of the material was assessed by measuring the peak depth of rectangular trays that were fabricated with the systems (Figure 6). It is evident from Figure 6 that the highest peak depths and corresponding strains were achieved by using the biaxial compaction, 1+1 method. It is likely that the transversal compaction enhanced the formability of the paper due to the uniform distribution of the elongation forces. The poorer performance of compacted 2X samples can be explained by the insufficient CD extensibility, which led to premature failure of the sample. In addition, the samples containing gelatin displayed the highest potential for 3D structures, impressive peak depth and strain values were recorded. The optimal processing temperature and humidity were found to be 120°C and 75% RH (moisture content of ~9%), respectively. Moreover, the developed 3-D shapes (trays) presented smooth edges, Figure 6, which indicated that the material is able to sustain vacuum sealing or deposition of an additional barrier layer as a post processing steps towards preparation of packaging materials.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 28 of 36

Exploiting the synergies toward paper extensibility/formability. To summarize, and to give perspective about the impact of our results, we consider the factors that contributed to the extensibility and formability of paper at different structural levels. Thus, a combined approach to improve paper extensibility is proposed, as illustrated in Figure 7. First, precursor wood fibers can be processed with a judicious combination of low and high consistency treatments under moderate temperatures. The long fibers (e.g. softwood kraft fibers) are preferred in this case since they tend to form stronger networks and a larger amount of deformations per fiber can be created during the high-consistency mechanical treatment. However, the proposed methods can be extended to short fibers as well. After forming the network, a subsequent in-plane compaction can be conducted. It is expected that the tensile strength and stiffness are significantly reduced after this process. Following, the compacted paper can be treated with water-soluble biopolymers (e.g., gelatin) and dried without restraint. Here, the emphasis is to use cost-efficient, sustainable approaches that use food-grade, biobased polymers instead of synthetic, acrylamide-base or otherwise conventional paper additives, which can be associated with certain toxicity concerns.40 The application of water-soluble, food-grade polymers facilitates the bonding between the fibers, which in turn improves the tensile strength and stiffness of in-plane compacted paper. Moreover, the polymers can be used to promote the paper shrinkage during the unrestrained drying, which further improves the paper extensibility. Finally, a proper softening of polymers during the forming step can be promoted by controlling the moisture and temperature, depending on the type of forming unit. The proposed approach contains a certain degree of flexibility, i.e., some of the treatment steps can be modified, interchanged or even replaced. For example, water-soluble polymers may be replaced by thermoplastics. Moreover, certain chemicals may be applied before the in-plane compaction


Page 29 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


in order to enhance the paper extensibility, followed by the addition of strength additives after the compaction to further reinforce the structure. As presented here, well-designed chemical treatments before or after the in-plane compaction is a promising approach to produce strong and extensible fiber networks. Moreover, the proposed approach to improve fiber network extensibility/formability can be implemented within the existing papermaking environments without addition of major capital costs.

Figure 7. Proposed approach to improve paper extensibility/formability via combined mechanical and polymer treatments. CONCLUSIONS We propose a combination of in-plane compression and biopolymer treatment for the preparation of extensible fiber networks. Compaction effectively contributed to network extensibility in the direction of compression. However, it led to significant reduction of tensile



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 30 of 36

strength and stiffness. Moreover, extensibility in the direction across the compaction was impaired. Therefore, biaxial compaction (longitudinal followed by lateral compaction) was performed to reduce property anisotropy. Application of water-soluble polymers, guar gum and gelatin, resulted in further improvement of paper extensibility. Remarkably, the strength of the compacted paper was also improved. For instance, the extensibility of paper increased from 8.5% for untreated sample to 14.0% for the compacted paper and 16.7% for the compacted paper with the addition of gelatin; likewise, the tensile strength index changed from ~50 to 24 Nm/g and became ~54 Nm/g for the compacted paper with the addition of gelatin. PLA, on the other hand, did not produce major benefits, possibly due to poor adhesion to cellulose. DMA experiments indicated superior stability of gelatin-loaded samples to temperature and humidity. The 2D formability strain of compacted paper upon gelatin addition reached values as high as 27%. Finally, press forming experiments of gelatin-loaded, compacted paper evidenced 21 mm deep rectangular trays prepared with the fixed blank process, which corresponds to unprecedented material extensibility of ~29%. The proposed approach provides an attractive platform for the preparation of advanced 3-D shapes using fiber-based, biodegradable materials. Furthermore, the processability of gelatin-treated, compacted paper is expected to allow other types of advanced forming

processes.

The

proposed

paper-based,

thermoformable

materials

are

biodegradable/compostable and will add to the efforts to grow the future circular economy.


Page 31 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


ASSOCIATED CONTENTS Supporting Information The following Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website: Photos that show the structure of unmodified and in-plane compacted paper; stress-strain curves of biopolymer-treated paper; temperature-dependent storage modulus of modified papers at relative humidity of 50% and 75%; storage modulus for modified papers after the relative humidity was changed stepwise from 30 to 90%.

AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Authors *

Mailing address: Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering,

Aalto University, Vuorimiehentie 1, FI-00076, Espoo, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] *

Mailing address: Alabama Center for Paper and Bioresource Engineering, Department of

Chemical Engineering, 212 Ross Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5127, United States. E-mail: [email protected] Author Contributions The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 32 of 36

This work was a part of ACel program of the Finnish Bioeconomy Cluster (FIBIC LTD) under the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES). The authors also acknowledge support from the Academy of Finland’s Project “3D-manufacturing of novel biomaterials” under the Biofuture 2025 program and the Center of Excellence “Engineering of Biosynthetic Hybrid Materials Research”, HYBER (2014-2019). The work made use of the Aalto University Nanomicroscopy Center (Aalto-NMC). We are also thankful to Sami-Seppo Ovaska (Lappeenranta University of Technology LUT) for assisting in press forming experiments. Stora Enso is gratefully acknowledged for providing the wood fibers.


Page 33 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


REFERENCES

1. PEMRG Plastics Europe market research group. Plastics – the Facts 2016. An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. http://www.plasticseurope.org/documents/document/20161014113313plastics_the_facts_2016_final_version.pdf (accessed 08/08/2017). 2. Pro Carton-Association of European Cartonboard and Carton Manufacturers. The importance of sustainability in packaging. http://www.procarton.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ProCarton-Sustainability-Study_en_Web3.pdf (accessed 08/08/2017). 3. Vishtal, A.; Hauptmann, M.; Zelm, R.; Majschak, J.; Retulainen, E. 3D Forming of Paperboard: The Influence of Paperboard Properties on Formability. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2013, 27, 677 – 691. 4. Vishtal, A.; Retulainen, E. Deep-drawing of paper and paperboard: the role of material properties. Bioresources 2012, 7, 4424-4450. 5. Vishtal, A.; Retulainen, E. Boosting the Extensibility Potential of Fibre Networks: A Review. Bioresources 2014, 9, 7951-8001. 6. Seth, R. S. Understanding sheet extensibility. Pulp & Paper Mag. Can. 2005, 106, T31. 7. Khakalo, A.; Vishtal, A.; Retulainen, E.; Filpponen, I.; Rojas, O. J. Mechanically-induced dimensional extensibility of fibers towards tough fiber networks. Cellulose 2017, 24, 191205. 8. Gopegui, R. R. D.; Jie, Y.; LaQuita, R.; Stevens, E.; Weil, J.; Witham, D. USA Patent WO2013192260 A1 Method for making molded fiber bottles, 2013. 9. Vuoti, S.; Laatikainen, E.; Heikkinen, H.; Johansson, L.; Saharinen, E.; Retulainen, E. Chemical modification of cellulosic fibers for better convertibility in packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 96, 549-559. 10. Larsson, P. A.; Wågberg, L. Towards natural-fibre-based thermoplastic films produced by conventional papermaking. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 3324-3333. 11. Larsson, P. A.; Berglund, L. A.; Wågberg, L. Highly ductile fibres and sheets by core-shell structuring of the cellulose nanofibrils. Cellulose 2014, 21, 323–333. 12. Marais, A.; Utsel, S.; Gustafsson, E.; Wågberg, L. Towards a super-strainable paper using the Layer-by-Layer technique. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 100, 218-224.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 34 of 36

13. Khakalo, A.; Filpponen, I.; Johansson, L.; Vishtal, A.; Lokanathan, A. R.; Rojas, O. J.; Laine, J. Using gelatin protein to facilitate paper thermoformability. React. Funct. Polym. 2014, 85, 175–184. 14. Vishtal, A.; Retulainen E. Improving the extensibility, wet web and dry strength of paper by addition of agar. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2014, 29, 434-443. 15. Vishtal, A.; Khakalo, A.; Rojas, O. J.; Retulainen, E. Improving the extensibility of paper: sequential spray addition of gelatine and agar. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2015, 30, 452-460. 16. Clupak AG Producing Сlupak extensible paper with an extensible unit. http://www.clupak.ch/01_clupakmachine/clupakmachine_haupt.html. 17. Ihrman, C. B.; Ohrn, O. E. Extensible Paper by the Double-Roll Compacting Process. Consol. Pap. Web, Trans. Symp. 1966, 1, 410-434. 18. Lahti, J.; Schmied, F.; Bauer, W. A method for preparing extensible paper on the laboratory scale. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2014, 29, 317-322. 19. Steenberg, B. Behaviour of paper under stress and strain. Pulp Pap. Mag. Can. 1949, 50, 207-214. 20. Dumbleton, D. F. Longitudinal compression of individual pulp fibres. Tappi J. 1972, 55, 117-135. 21. Vishtal, A.; Retulainen, E. An approach for improved 3d formability of paper. IPW 2014, 12, 46–50. 22. Vishtal, A. Formability of paper and its improvement, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, 2015. 23. Lindström, T.; Wågberg, L.; Larsson, T. On the nature of joint strength in paper – a review of dry and wet strength resins used in paper manufacturing. 13th Fundamental Research Symposium, Cambridge, 2005, 457. 24. Hannuksela, T.; Holmbom, B.; Mortha, G.; Lachenal, D. Effect of sorbed galactoglucomannans and galactomannans on pulp and paper handsheet properties, especially strength properties. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2004, 19, 237-244. 25. Lucenius, J.; Parikka, K.; Österberg, M. Nanocomposite films based on cellulose nanofibrils and water-soluble polysaccharides. React. Funct. Polym. 2014, 85, 167-174. 26. Svensson, A.; Lindström, T.; Ankerfors, M.; Östlund, S. 3D-shapeable thermoplastic paper materials. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2013, 28, 602-610.


Page 35 of 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


27. Tanninen, P.; Leminen, V.; Kainusalmi, M.; Varis, J. Effect of process parameter variation on the dimensions of press-formed paperboard trays. Bioresources 2016, 11, 140-158. 28. Shoudy, C. A. The Clupak paper story. Tappi 1959, 42, 108-110. 29. Welsh, H. S. Fundamental properties of high stretch papers. Consol. Pap. Web, Trans. Symp. 1966, 1, 397-409. 30. Poppel, E. Paper-rheology. An applied science. Appl. Rheol. 1996, 6, 269-275. 31. Khakalo, A.; Filpponen, I.; Rojas, O. J. Protein adsorption tailors the surface energies and compatibility between polylactide and cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 1426-1433. 32. Khoshkava, V.; Kamal, M. R. Effect of Surface Energy on Dispersion and Mechanical Properties of Polymer/Nanocrystalline Cellulose Nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 3155−3163. 33. Norström, E.; Fogelström, L.; Nordqvist, P.; Khabbaz, F.; Malmström, E. Gum dispersions as environmentally friendly wood adhesives. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 736-744. 34. Zhang, H.; Zhao, C.; Li, Z.; Li, J. The fiber charge measurement depending on the polyDADMAC accessibility to cellulose fibers. Cellulose 2016, 23, 163–173. 35. Hummert, E.; Henniges, U.; Potthast, A. Fluorescence labeling of gelatin and methylcellulose: monitoring their penetration behavior into paper. Cellulose 2013, 20, 919931. 36. Hannuksela, T.; Tenkanen, M.; Holmbom, B. Sorption of dissolved galactoglucomannans and galactomannans to bleached kraft pulp. Cellulose 2002, 9, 251-261. 37. Rojas, O. J.; Neuman, R. D. Adsorption of polysaccharide wet-end additives in papermaking systems. Colloids Surf., A 1999, 115, 419–432. 38. Gregorova, A.; Lahti, J.; Schennach, R.; Stelzer, F. Humidity response of Kraft papers determined by dynamic mechanical analysis. Thermochim. Acta 2013, 570, 33-40. 39. Farris, S.; Schaich, K., M.; Liu, L.; Piergiovanni, L.; Yam, K., L. Development of polyioncomplex hydrogels as an alternative approach for the production of bio-based polymers for food packaging applications: a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 316-332. 40. Honkalampi-Hamalainen, U.; Bradley, E. L.; Castle, L.; Severin, I.; Dahbi, L.; Dahlman, O.; Lhuguenot, J.-C.; Andersson, M. A.; Hakulinen, P.; Hoornstra, D.; Maki-Paakkanen, J.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.; Turco, L.; Stammati, A.; Zucco, F.; Weber, A.; von Wright, A. Safety evaluation of food contact paper and board using chemical tests and in vitro



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 36 of 36

bioassays: role of known and unknown substances. Food Addit. Contam. , Part A 2010, 27, 406-415. For Table of Contents Use Only

Compressive deformation together with biopolymer treatment to preformed cellulosic fiber networks are proposed as a sustainable approach towards moldable materials.


In-Plane Compression and Biopolymer Permeation ... - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents