2416
J. Org. Chem.
squares refinement, anisotropic for the C, 0, and N atoms and isotropic for the H atoms. The calculations were carried out with XRAY76 and scattering factors from Cromer and Manna1' S-(p-Nitrophenyl)-2-pent-4-yn-l-ylpyrimidine (1). Crystals of 1 are orthorhombic, space group Pbca with 8 molecules in the unit cell with dimensions a = 10.066 (2) A, b = 34.428 (6) A, c = 7.647(3) A, V = 2650 (1)A3, p = 0.86 cm-', and ddc = 1.34 g cm4. Crystal dimensions are 0.18 X 0.20 X 0.50 mm. A total of 2437 intensities were measured, from which 1466 were below the 2.5a(Z) level. The final R value was 0.052 (R, = 0.062, using a weighing scheme w = (85 + F, + 0.003F2)-'). 2-(l,l-Dicyanopent-4-yn-l-yl)-5-nitropyrimidine (2). Crystals of 2 are monoclinic, space group P2,/n, with 8 molecules in the unit cell with dimensions a = 22.604 (2) A, b = 10.271 (2) A, c = 10.146 (2) A, j3 = 98.75 ( 2 ) O , V = 2328.1 (7) A3, p = 0.73 cm-l, and ddc = 1.32 g ~ m - ~Crystal . dimensions are 0.15 X 0.25 X 0.30 mm. A total or 4051 intensities were measured, from which 2286 were below the 2.540 level. The final R value was 0.054 ( R , = 0.094, using a weighing scheme w = (3.98 F, O.O216F:)-'). Computations. All molecular mechanics calculations were performed on the VAX cluster of the CAOS/CAMM Centre,
+
+
(17) Cromer, D. T.; Mann, J. B. Acta Crystallogr. 1968, A24, 321.
1991,56, 2416-2421 University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, with the M M force field of the CHEMX program." The MNDO calculations were carried out on a CONVEX C120 computer, with use of the VAMP program."
Acknowledgment. T h e present investigations have been carried out under t h e auspices of The Netherlands Foundation for Chemical Research (SON), with financial aid from T h e Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). All calculations in this study were done at the CAOS/CAMM Centre, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Use of the services and facilities of the Dutch National NWO/SURF Expertise1 Center CAOS/CAMM, under Grants SON 326-052 and STW NCH99.1751, is gratefully acknowledged. Furthermore, we are indebted to Dr. H. Bruins Slot from the CAOS/CAMM Centre for the useful discussions on the methods used in this study and Dr. H. R. M. Leenders for his help with writing some Fortran programs. Supplementary Material Available: Tables of atomic coordinates, thermal parameters, bond distances, and bond angles (12 pages). Ordering information is given on any current masthead page.
Indirect Electrooxidation of Alcohols by a Double Mediatory System with Two Redox Couples of [R,N+=O]/R,NO' and [Br' or Br+]/Br- in an Organic-Aqueous Two-Phase Solution Tsutomu Inokuchi, Sigeaki Matsumoto, and Sigeru Torii* Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan 700 Received September 10, 1990 An indirect electrooxidation method for alcohol to aldehyde or ketone conversion has been developed. This method, applicable to chemoselective oxidation, employs two redox couples, consisting of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxy1derivatives 6 and active bromine species. The former is required for the chemical process and recycled, whereas the latter is to be involved in the electrochemicalproms. Three chemical events play an important role in this system: (1)the formation of [Br' or Br+] from bromide ion by discharge on the anode in an aqueous solution, (2) the reaction of N-oxy1 compounds 6 with active bromine species to generate N-oxoammonium ion 7, and (3) the oxidation of alcohols with 7 in an organic phase. Optimum conditions were established as follows: an aqueous 25% NaBr solution buffered at pH 8.6 in a binary system, the use of 1-10 mol % of 4-(benzoyl0xy)piperidine derivatives 6, and adjustment of an electric current at 10-100 mA/cm2. The successful applications of the present method to the oxidation of a variety of primary and secondary alcohols including 1,n-diols,giving the corresponding carbonyl compounds, have delineated its synthetic utility. The chemoselective oxidation of a primary hydroxy group in the presence of secondary one has been achieved with a high selectivity by the present procedure. T h e development of practical electrooxidation methods for alcohols is one of desirable goals in synthetic chemistry.' In this context, a double mediatory system which features two redox couples consisted of Ru(VIII)/Ru(IV) and [Cl+]/Cl- has been developed in our laboratory prior to the present work. This idea provided a considerable advantage t h a t the chemical and the electrochemical processes took place separatedly in an organic and aqueous phase, respectively, by use of a two-phase solution.2 Indeed, this procedure bears a practical aspect t h a t it is capable of oxidizing secondary alcohols in a large-scale workFb However, it is still desirable to find a more efficient system for selective aldehyde synthesis, which motivated (1) Torii, 5. Electroorganic Syntheses; Kodaneha + VCH: Tokyo + Weinheim, 1985; Part I, Chapter 11. (2) (a) Torii, S.;Inokuchi, T.; Sugiura, T. J. Org. Chem. 1986,51,155. (b) Torii, S.; Inokuchi, T.; Matsumoto, S.;Saeki, T.; Oki, T. Bull. Chem. SOC. Jpn. 1990,63,852.
0022-3263/91/1956-2416$02.50/0
us to examine the role of a nonmetallic redox reagent such as N-oxoammonium salts 7 as a mediator3i4for the chemical process t o circumvent t h e problems imposed by the high-valency ruthenium compounds. N-Oxoammonium salts 7 are highly useful for t h e oxidation of primary a n d secondary alcohols to the corresponding aldehydes and ketones, respectively. For this purpose, aprotic media are usually employed, probably because they are labile in water.6 However, it became feasible to manipulate this reagent in an aqueous-organic two-phase system because 7 can be revived, after oxidizing alcohols, by being oxidized with reagents such as NaOCl-KBr,G NaBr02,7 Ca(OC1)2,7and R4NBr3,8which occurs
-
(3) Semmelhack, M. F.; Chou, C. S.;Cortes,D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
- - --
19113. - --,-105. -, 4492-.
(4) Preliminary reaulta have been reported: Inokuchi, T.; Mataumoto, S.; Nisiyama, T.; Torii, S. Synlett 1990, 57. (5) Yamaguchi,M.; Takata, T.; Endo, T. J. Org. Chem. 1990,55,1490.
0 1991 American Chemical Society
Indirect Electrooxidation of Alcohols
J. Org. Chem., Vol. 56,No. 7, 1991 2417 Table I. Indirect Electrooxidation of Undecanol (la) under Various Conditions" Alcohols
Br '
Carbonyl Compds anode
5
-29
RCH,OH 1
entry 1 2 3 4e
N-&yl m
CH,Cl2-NaBr-H2O
RCHO + RCOPCHPR
3
2
6 7
8 9
-2e N-OXYI CH2C12-NaBr-H20 ~2
R'>OH R* 4
10 11 12 5
at the boundary face of the two-phase system. In this paper, we describe a new method for the indirect electrooxidation of alcohols by using the combination of two redoxes, [RzN+=O]/RzNO' and [Br' or Br+]/Br-, in an organic-aqueous two phase solution (Scheme I)? Investigated are the following factors, which are essential for optimizing the reaction conditions: (1)the effect of halide salt types and its concentration in an aqueous phase, (2) the ensemble of N-oxy1 compound types, their concentration, and pH values, and (3) the effect of electrolysis conditions such as current density and the kind of electrode. Eventually, the oxidation of various alcohols were examined by using the method developed here. These results would highlight the potential of the method together with our previous method employing Ru(VII1)/ Ru(IV)-[Cl+]/Cl- redox couples.2
Results and Discussion The effect of halide salts in a two-phase solution such as CHzCl2-H20or AcOEt-HzO system was firstly investigated by using 4-(benzoyloxy)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxy1 (sa) as a mediator. The electrolysis of undecanol la (R = n-CloNzl, 1.0 mmol) in a CHzClz(5 mL)-aqueous 25% NaBr (buffered at pH 8.6 with NaHC O , 10 mL) system in the presence of 6a (0.01 mmol) at a current density of 20 mA/cm2 (applied voltage: 1.5-2.5 V) afforded the desired undecanal (2a) in 97% yield by passing 2.0 F/mol of electricity for 60 min. Similar results were obtained with respect to other bromide salts such as potassium bromide (93% yield) and lithium bromide (93% yield). In contrast to these, ammonium bromide did not work well (19% yield of 2a), which may be ascribed to the formation of a 1:l complex of molecular bromine and ammonia generated during the electrolysis.1° Chloride salts such as LiCl and NaCl were less satisfactory (13-33% yields of 2a) and the iodide was not effective at all. As a result of our effort to clarify the concentration effect of sodium bromide in an aqueous layer, it was found that the yield of 2a reached a plateau at about 15 wt % of (6) (a) Anelli, P. L.; Biffi, C.; Montanari, F.; Quici, S. J. Org. Chem. 1987,52,2559. (b)Siedlecka,R.; Skamewski, J.; Mlochowski, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990,31, 2177. (7) Inokuchi, T.; Matsumoto, S Nisiyama, T.; Torii, S. J. Org. Chem. 1990,56,462. (8) Inokuchi, T.; Matsumoto, S.; Fukushima, M.; Toni, S. Bull. Chem. SOC.Jpn., in press. (9) It haa been p'oposed that oxoammonium dta 7 react with alcohols to form hydroxylamme 10, which leads to two molecules of N-oxy16 by comproportionation with 7 (see ref 3). (10) Bellucci, G.; Berti, G.; Bianchini, R.; Orsini, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982,23, 3635.
13 14 15 16 17
N-oxy1 (mol % ) b 6a (0.2)
6a (0.5) 6a (1.0) 6a (1.0) 6a (10.0) 6b (1.0) 6c (1.0) 6d (1.0) 6e (1.0) 8a (1.0) 8b (1.0) 6a (1.0) 6a (1.0) 6a (1.0) 6a (1.0) 6c (1.0) 6f (1.0)
electricity, pHc 8.6 8.6
8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6
F/mol 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
product yield, %*
2a IO
3a
la
75
77 92
14 0
12 2 6
88
0
1
92 93
0 0 0 0 0
4 5
91
11
2.0 2.0
93 90 76 57 87
7
2.0
4
2.0 2.2 2.6 2.4
8.6 8.6 8.6
2.0 2.0
0
8 6 9 15
0 0
33
88
0
3
69 97 97 99
10 0 0
20
0
0
6
0 0
'Carried out by using la (1.0 mmol) in CHzCIP(5 mL)-25% NaBr (10mL) at room temperature. bMol % based on la. 'The pH of aqueous 25% NaBr solution was adjusted as follows: pH 11 = 0.2 M Na2B4074.1M NaOH, pH 8.6 = saturated with NaHCOS, pH 7 = 0.1 M Na2HP04-0.1 M KHzP04, pH 4 = 0.2 M Na2POI. dDetermined by GC analyses with a-methoxynaphthalene as a standard. eCarried out in AcOEt (5 mL)-25% NaBr (10mL).
NaBr. Hereafter, a 25% NaBr solution was utilized as the standard conditions. Effect of the N-oxy1 compounds was investigated in an ordinary way to determine the minimum amount of the reagent capable of effecting a smooth conversion. As shown in entries 1-5 (Table I), the reactions are satisfactory even with 1-10 mol % of N-oxy1 compound 6a (based on la) in a CHzC12-Hz0or an AcOEt-HzO system; the turnover number of the reagent 6a was about 100 when 1mmol of the substrate was employed. The formation of ester 3a (R = n-CloHz,) of homocoupling type increased as the amount of 6a was decreased to 0.2 mol % (entry 1). The run in the absence of 6a resulted in the substantial recovery of 1a.l1 Various N-oxy1 derivatives of both piperidine and pyrrolidine skeletons were employed to gain further insight into their role in the mediatory system. Data in entries 6 1 4 were obtained at the stage when 2 F/mol of electricity had been passed for the oxidation of la to 2a. Piperidine derivatives 6a-d, bearing a benzoyloxy, (4-tert-butylbenzoyl)oxy, cyano, and methoxy group at the C-4 positions, respectively, provided high yields of 2a (entries 3 and 6-9), although a small amount of la remained unchanged. It appears that hydrophobic appendages to the C-4 of piperidine favor the yield of 2a.12 It is noteworthy, however, that the oxidations were completed with 2.2-2.6 F/mol of electricities (entries 15-17). The unsatisfactory resulta obtained with the pyrrolidine derivatives 8a and 8b as a mediator (entries 10 and 11,76 and 57% yields) may be ascribed to the structural characteristic of themselves. Inspection of a molecular model of 8a and its 3D space-filling model assessed as the most stable conformer by computer calculations suggests that the 2,2,6,6-tetramethylgroups make 9a less congested than 7 around the N=O bond. It has been proposed that the addition of alcohols to the N-0 bond is reversible, and (11) The reaction was partidy accompanied by bromination atthe
C-4and C-5positions of la. (12) Our attempts with di-tert-butylnitroxyland 3,3-dimethyl-l-oxa4-azaspiro[4.6]decane-4-oxyl(DOXYL-cyclohexane)as a mediator were unsuccessful.
&
2418 J, Org. Chem., Vol. 56,No. 7,1991 &(CH2)I3&
I
I
6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e.
X=02CPh X = O&C~H,-~-BU' X=CN X=OMe X=H
Scheme I1
II
I
0.
0.
&
Inokuchi et al.
0.
0
6f
7 or 9
1 Or4
7
X
8a. X=CH202CPh 8b, X=C02Me
10
9
this process quickly reaches a state of equilibrium, and the @-eliminationof A to give the carbonyl compound (2 or 5) and N-hydroxy compound 10 becomes a rate-determining step accordingly (Scheme II).5 A five-membered cyclic transition state required for the @-eliminationmay be achieved more readily in the piperidine than in the pyrrolidine derivatives because the former is conformationally immobilized around the C-0-N+ bond in A for steric reason as mentioned above. Furthermore, the yields of 2a turned out to be sensitive to the pH in the aqueous phase. Neutral to weakly basic media were highly favorable over acidic ones for the aldehyde synthesis as indicated in entries 12-14, Table I. The competitive oxidations of a 1:l mixture of undecanol (la) and 3-decanol(11) have been examined at 0 "C with different kinds of N-oxy1 compounds 6a, 6d, 6e, and 8a (entries 1-4, Table 11) under pH-controlled conditions. In general, the electrolyses mediated by the piperidine derivatives 6a, 6d, and 6e gave higher selectivities (2a:12 = 10-18/ 1) compared with the pyrrolidine derivative 8a (2a:12 = 6/1). The highest product ratio (2a:12 = 73/1) among the entries was attained when 2 F/mol of electricity was passed with the N-oxy1 compound 6a at pH 12 (ca. 60% conversion, entry 6). O -H
1 LE
0- 2OeC ., 20 N-oxy1 mA/cm*{
11
'
2orS
0 40
0
40 80 120 Current density (mA/cm2)
Figure 1. Relationships between the yield of 2a and current density. Symbols are as follows: Pt electrode (shaded circles). Glassy carbon electrode (open circles).
mediatory methods with an N-oxoammonium/N-oxy1 redox couple are successful only under anhydrous conditions in a divided cell. On the other hand, the present double mediatory system is obviously featured by an aqueousorganic two-phase system. The electrolysis plays a role of generating reactive bromine species in the aqueous solution (in an undivided cell) and the generation of Noxoammonium salts 7 from 6 by the action of this active bromine species and the oxidation of the substrates with 7 proceed in the organic phase. The reaction, therefore, can be carried out under a wide range of current densities (10-120 mA/cm2) with continuous generation of these recyclable reagents. As shown in Table I, the use of the buffer solution (pH 8.6) favors the oxidation of both primary and secondary alcohols, which is in marked contrast with the case of lutidine in anhydrous acetonitrile. Application of the present procedure to a variety of primary and secondary alcohols was tested to ensure its feasibility. A number of examples compiled in Table I11 were carried out under the conditions indicated in entry 3 (Table 11). Aldehydes were produced efficiently from primary alcohols without any overoxidation to homocoupling type esters or carboxylic acids (entries 1-6). Oxidations of aromatic alcohols proceeded smoothly, but there emerged an undesired case in which the bromination of the aromatic nucleus occurred in addition to the formation of the carbonyl group (entry 4). While the bromination was predominant in the oxidation of m-methoxybenzyl alcohol, m-phenoxybenzyl alcohol was oxidized to mphenoxybenzaldehyde without any concomitant bromination of the aromatic ring (entry 5). These phenomena may be ascribed to the difference in steric circumstances between the two compounds. Such a drawback observed for m-methoxybenzyl alcohol can be eliminated by use of electrosynthesized tetraalkylammonium tribromide as a cooxidant.8 The present method turned out to effect the selective oxidation of a variety of diols. 1,3-Diols led to the corre-
ycHo
c L
12
Correlations between the yield of 2a and the current density are illustrated in Figure 1,which indicate that high efficiency is available over the range of 10-140 mA/cm2 with a platinum electrode or over 10-80 mA/cm2 with a glassy carbon electrode. These delightful results suggest that the N-oxoammonium salts are efficiently recycled as a mediator, reacting quickly with the substrate la through an aqueous-organic two phase system. More importantly, this implies high processability and promising applicability of the present method to a practical process. Semmelhack et al. reported the indirect electrooxidation of alcohols with N-oxoammonium salts 7 generated directly from 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-l-oxyl(6e, TEMPO) by potential-controlled electrooxidation at +0.4 V (Ag/ Ag(1)) in an MeCN-LiC104 system with lutidine as a base? Osa, Bobbit, and their co-workers have recently devised a similar reaction system with a TEMPO-derived modified electrode on carbon felt, which is operated in an in-cell manner with lutidine as a base.13a However, these single (13) (a) Osa, T.; Akiba, U.; Segawa,I.; Bobbitt, J. M. Chem. Lett. 1988, 1423. (b) MacCorquodale, F.; Crayston, J. A.; Walton, J. C.; Worsfold, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990,32, 771.
160
Indirect Electrooxidation of Alcohols
J. Org. Chem., Vol. 56, No.7,1991 2419
Table 11. Effect of N-Oxy1 Compounds on the Competitive Oxidation of la or 11' product yield, %C
entry 1
2 3 4
5 6 7
N-oxy1 compd 6a 6d 6e 8a 6a 6a 6a
aqueous phase (pH) sat. NaHCO9-25% NaBr (8.6) sat. NaHC03-25% NaBr (8.6) sat. NaHC03-25% NaBr (8.6) sat. NaHC03-25% NaBr (8.6) 5% NaOAc-25% NaBr (8.0) 5% Na2C03-25% NaBr (12.0) 5% Na2C03-25% NaBr (12.0)
electricity: F/mol 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.5
2a 88 63 78 64 84 58 89
12 5 6 6 10 4
0.8 1.7
ratio 2a/12 1811 10/1 13/1 6/1 28/ 1 7311 52/1
'Carried out at 0 "C by using a 1:l mixture of la (1mmol) and 11 (1mmol) in an aqueous (5 mL)-organic (CH2Clz,10 mL)-(Pt) system. *Faradays/mol based on la at a current density of 20 mA/cmZ. cBased on isolated products.
sponding ,&hydroxy aldehydes (aldols, entries 7 and 8), selectively,without any dehydration and epimerization at the a-position.' Oxidative cyclizations of 1,4- and 1,5-diols to y- and &lactones,respectively, proceeded nicely (entries 9 and 10). Primary-primary or primary-secondary 1,ndiols (n> 5) gave 1,n-dialdehyde with more than 4 F/mol of electricity (entry 11)or n-hydroxyalkanals with 2 F/mol of electricity, predominantly (entries 12 and 13).6bThe oxidation of secondary alcohols also proceeded smoothly without any bromination at the a-position of carbonyl groups (entries 14-17). It is noteworthy that the oxidation of 1,Bdiol produced 1,a-diketonein good yield without any cleavage of a carbon-carbon bond (entry 18). Similarly, a-acetoxy alcohol and 2-hydroxy alcohol were converted to the corresponding acetoxy ketone and vicinal diketone, respectively (entries 19 and 20). In conclusion, we have explored that the combination of an organic and a halogen redox couples is effective for the selective oxidation of alcohols, especially primary ones, and the turnover of oxoammonium salt is almost 100 in a 1-100-mmol-scale work. This electrolysis system is expected to be extended in a large-scale preparation (example of 1OO-mmol-scaleoperation was noted in the Experimental Section) since no deterioration of the mediator, most of which was recoverable by the chromatographic separation or distillation under reduced pressure, was observed in the run with 6a under high current densities. High selectivity observed for the competitive oxidation of primary and secondary hydroxy groups with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-l-oxyl6a under the basic conditions (pH 12) is of significant synthetic value. Experimental Section14 Electrolysis Apparatus. Unless otherwise noted, an undivided cell [2.5-cm diameter and 10-cm height (30-mL volume) or 8.0-cm diameter and 12-cm height (300-mL volume)] fitted with a gas inlet pipe, a stirring bar, and a thermometer was used. Two platinum foil electrodes (3 cm2) or glassy carbon electrodes (3 cm2) were placed parallel to each other 10 mm apart. The vessel was immersed in a water bath maintained to 15-25 "C by external cooling. Electrooxidation of Primary Alcohols to Aldehydes: Typical Procedure. Undecanol (la, 172 mg, 1.0 mmol) and 4-(benzoyloxy)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-l-oxyl (sa, 2.8 mg, 0.01 mmol) were dissolved in CHzClz (5 mL) in an electrolysis (14) 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidinal-oxyl (6a-0 and their pyrrolidine analogues (8a,b)were prepared according to the method reported15and purified by recryetalliitionaor column chromatography. Starting alcoprior hols were purified by dietillation or column chromatography @ioz) to use. Boiling points indicated by an air-bath temperature and melting points are uncorrected. 'H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl,. GC analyeea were carried out on a "Quadrex"Bond-Fused silica capillary column (methyl silicone 20M 0.25 am film thickness, 25 m X 0.25 mm i.d.1 at programmed temperature (from 80 to 250 O C , 10 OC/min) after 10-min isothermal analysis. (15) (a) Rozantzev, E. G.; Neiman, M. B. Tetrahedron 1964,20,131. (b) Rozantsev, E. G.; Sholle, V:D. Synthesis 1971,401.
vessel, and to this solution was added an aqueous 25% NaBr solution (10 mL) saturated with NaHCO,, thereby being buffered at pH 8.6. Into the upper layer of the resulting biphase solution were immersed two platinum or glassy carbon electrodes, and the mixture was electrolyzed under a constant current of 20 mA/cm2 with a moderate stirring (applied voltage: 1.5-2.5 V). The electrolysis was continued until the organic phase showed a color change from slightly yellow to brown (it required about 2.2 F/mol of electricity based on the alcohol la). The mixture was then treated with ethanol (0.1 mL) to destroy the excess of oxoammonium salt. The CHzC12layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with CHzC12 (5 mL X 3). The combined extracts were washed with brine, dried (N@04), and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (SiOz,20 g, hexaneAcOEt, 101,150 mL) to give 165 mg (97%) of undecanal(2a) as an oil and the N-oxy1 6a (ca.2 mg).2a: bp 113 "C (9 mm); IR (neat) 2716,1729 (M), 1466 cm-'; 'H NMR (500 MHz) 8 0.88 (t,J = 7.0 Hz, 3, CH,), 1.26 (br s, 14, CHz), 1.62 (m, 2, CH2), 2.41 (dt, J = 7.3, 2.0 Hz, 2, CHzCO),9.76 (t,J = 2.0 Hz, 1,CHO); '9c N M R (126 MHz) 6 14.1, 22.1, 22.7, 19.2, 29.29, 29.34, 29.4, 29.5, 31.9, 43.9, 203.0. A Large-Scale Operation. A mixture of la (17.23 g, 100 mmol) and 6a (0.28 g, 1.0 mmol) in CHzClz(200 mL)-aqueous 25% NaBr (pH 8.6, 400 mL) was electrolyzed in a beaker-type flask (1500-mL volume) with two graphite plate electrodes (3 X 6 cm2)under a constant current of 900 mA (current density: 50 mA/cm2). After passage of 2.8 F/mol of electricity (reaction time: 8.5 h), the reaction was quenched with ethanol (2 mL), and the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2(50 mL X 2). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4)and concentrated. Crude product was purified by distillation to give 15.1 g (88%) of 2a as an oil: bp 95-98 "C (6 mm). Oxidation of Secondary Alcohols to Ketones: A Typical Procedure. 4-tert-Butylcyclohexanol(4a,4.69 g, 30 mmol) and 4-(benzoyloxy)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-l-oxyl (6a, 83 mg, 0.3 mmol) were dissolved in CHzClz(50 mL) placed in an electrolysis vessel [6.0-cm diameter and 13-cm height (250-mL volume)], and to this solution was added aqueous 25% NaBr buffered at pH 8.6 with saturated NaHCO, (75 mL). Into the upper aqueous layer were immersed two graphite plate electrodes (2.5 x 4.0 cm2),and the mixture was electrolyzed under a constant current of 200 mA with a moderate stirring (applied voltage: 1.5-2.5 V). During the electrolysis, the mixture was maintained at 20-25 "C. The electrolysis was continued until 2.2 F/mol of electricity had been passed. The mixture was then treated with ethanol (1mL). The organic layer was separated, and aqueous layer was extracted with CHzClz (20 mL X 3). The combined extracts were dried (Na2SO4)and concentrated to give 4.30 g of the crude products. Distillation at 80-82 "C (12 mm) gave 3.86 g (83%) of 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone(5a): mp 48-49 "C (from hexane) (lit.16mp 47.5-48.5 "C). Competitive Oxidation of la or 3-Decanol(ll). A mixture of la (172 mg, 1.0 mmol), 11 (158 mg, 1.0 mmol), and 6a (2.8 mg, 0.01 mmol) was electrolyzed in a two-phase solution of CHzClz (5 mL) and aqueous 25% NaBr buffered at pH 12 with 5% Na2CO3in the presence of octyl acetate (172 mg, 1.0 mmol) as an internal standard for GC analyses. After 2 F/mol of electricity had been passed at a current of 20 mA/cmZ, the mixture was (16) Winstein, S.; Holness, N. J. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1955, 77, 5562.
Inokuchi et al.
2420 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 56, No. 7, 1991
Table 111. Oxidation of Primary and Secondary Alcohols by an N-Oxy1 (6a) or [Br' or Br']/Br- Syetema electricity: (yield, entry substrate F/mol product % )C 1
3.0
2
2.2
3
3.0
4
4.0
5
3.0
6
2.5
7
3.7
8
w
2.0
OH
4.5
9 10
4.5
HOO -H
11 12
4.5 2.0
13
2.0
OHC(CH2)&HO
vcH OH
'&
R = MeCH(0H)
CHO
14
2.5
15
2.2
16
3.0
17
2.5
18
6.0
v 0
4 0
19
8.0
20
2.2
& 0
0
aSubstrates (1 mmol) were oxidized in the presence of 6a (0.01 mmol) in CHzClz(5 mL)-25% NaBr (pH 8.6 buffered with NaHCOS, 10 mL). *Electricity based on the substrate. Yields based on isolated products. worked up in the usual manner and the crude products were analyzed by GC to be 58% of 2a and 0.8% of 12. Selected physical and spectral data for compounds listed in Table I11 are as follows. Phenylacetaldehyde: bp 76-78 OC (10 mm) (lit." bp 63-64 OC (5 mm)). ( 1 7 ) Giledorf, €2.
T.; Nord, F. F. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1952, 74, 1837.
4-(Benzyloxy)butanal: bp 154-156 "C (24 mm) (lit.'8 bp 143 (10 mm)); IR (neat) 3032,2862,2728,1725 (C=O), 1456,1363, 1100,739,698 cm-'; 'H NMR (60 MHz) 6 2.00 (m,2, CHz), 2.57 (m, 2, CH2), 2.55 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2, CH3,4.55 (8, 2, CHz), 7.42 (8, 5, PhH),9.89 (m, 1, CHO); '9c NMR (126 MHz) 8 22.5,40.9,69.1, 72.9, 127.6 (3 C), 128.4 (2 C),138.2, 202.3. O C
(18) Paul, R.;
Tchelitcheff, S. Bull. SOC.Chim. Fr. 1948, 197.
Indirect Electrooxidation of Alcohols 4-Nitrobenzaldehyde: mp 103-104 OC (lit.lQmp 104-105 "C). 4-Bromo-3-methoxybenzaldehyde:mp 71.3-73.2 OC (from hexane) (litammp 74 "C); IR (KBr) 1601(C-O),1572,1475,1286, 934, 822,648, 598 cm-';'H NMR (500 MHz) 6 3.828, 3.834 (8, 3, MeO), 7.01 (m, 1,PhH), 7.40 (m, 1,PhH), 7.45 (m, 1, PhH), 10.29 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1,CHO); 13C NMR (126 MHz) 6 55.7, 112.6, 117.9, 123.1, 133.9, 134.5, 159.2, 191.7 3-Phenoxybenzaldehyde: bp 180-184 "C (14 mm) (lit.,' bp 175-176 "C (11 mm)); IR (neat) 3066,2818,2734,1694 (C=O), 1582,1483,1452,1390,1164,1131,944cm-'; 'H NMR (500 MHz) 6 7.04 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2),7.17 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 11,729 (d,d, J = 7.8, 2.2 Hz, 11,7.38 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 21, 7.46 (m, 11, 7.50 (t,J = 7.8 Hz, l),7.60 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, l),9.96 (8, 1,CHO); 13C NMR (126 MHz) 6 118.1, 119.5, 124.2, 124.6, 124.7,130.0, 130.4, 138.0, 156.2, 158.4, 191.6. 2-Tetradecynal: bp 98-100 OC (0.2 mm) (lit.22bp 94-98 OC (0.3 mm)). 2-Ethyl-3-hydroxyhexanal:bp 100-102 OC (9 mm) (lit.B bp 107-110 OC (16 mm)). 24 l-Hydroxycycl~hexyl)propanal:~ IR (neat) 3426 (OH), 2738,1719 (C=O) cm-'; 'H NMR (500 MHz) 6 1.13 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3, CH3), 1.24 (m, 1, CH2),1.42 (m, 1,CH,), 1.50-1.66 (m, 8, CH2), 2.04 (8, 1, OH), 2.43 (m, 1, CHCO), 9.83 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1, CHO). Dodecanedial: mp 47-50 OC (lit.%bp 128-30 OC (4 mm)); IR (neat) 2918,2852,1715 (C=O), 1473,1410,1394cm-'; 'H NMR (500 MHz) 6 1.28 (br 8, 8, CH,), 1.59-1.64 (m, 4, CH2),2.42 (m, 8, CH2),9.76 (t,J = 1.8 Hz, 1,CHO); 13CNMR (126 MHz) 6 22.0 (2 C), 29.1 (2 C), 29.3 (4 C), 43.9 (2 C), 202.9 (2 C). l0-HydroxyundecanalZsIR (neat) 3330 (OH), 2930, 2853, 2720, 1725 (C=O) cm-'; 'H NMR (200 MHz) 6 1.16, 1.17 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3, CH3), 1.29 (br 9, 12, CH,), 1.40 (br, 1,OH), 1.61 (m, 2, CH2), 2.40 (m, 2, CHJ, 3.76 (m, 1, OCH), 9.74 (m, 1, CHO); 13CNMR (50 MHz) 6 22.0, 23.5,25.7, 29.1, 29.2, 29.3, 29.5,39.3, 43.9, 68.1, 203.0. 3-(l-Hydroxyethyl)-2,2-dmethylcyclobutyla~etaldehyde:~~ IR (neat) 3330 (OH), 2726,1721 (M) cm-';'H NMR (500 MHz) 6 0.99, 1.13 ( ~ , 6CH3), , 1.03 (d,d, J = 7.3,1.3 Hz, 3, CHJ, 1.13-1.19 (m, l),1.761.82 (m, l),1.95-2.03 (m, l),2.162.34 (m, 2), 2.42-2.48 (19) Brown, H. C.; Subba Rao, B. C. J. Am. Chemxoc. 1958,80,5377. (20) Hodgson, H. H.; Beard, H. G. J. Chem. SOC.1925,875. Jpn. 1955,75, (21) Tomita, M.; Edataune, S.; Iwata, S. J. Pharm. SOC. 1021. (22) Weilee, P. C. A u t . J. Chem. 1959, 12, 173. (23) Blanc, P. Y.;Perret, A,; Teppa, F. HeZu. Chim. Acta 1964,47,567. (24) Meyer, M. Compt. Rend. 1937,204, 1948. (25) Anelli, P. L.; Banfi, S.; Montanari, F.; Quici, S. J. Org. Chem. 1989,54, 2970.
J. Org. Chem., Vol. 56, No. 7, 1991 2421 (m, l),3.69 (m, l),9.70 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 1,CHO); l8C NMR (126 MHz) (major isomer) 6 17.0,21.2,26.4,31.0,35.7,40.0,45.1,50.5, 69.1, 202.1. 6-Undecanone: bp 93-95 OC (5 mm) (lit.%bp 124-125 "C (35 mm)). Dodecane-6J-dione: bp 110-113 OC (13 mm) (lit.n bp 90-92 O C (3 "1); IR (neat) 3414,1715 (C=O), 1678,1653,1466,1404, 1122 cm-'; 'H NMR (200 MHz) 6 0.88 (m, 6, CH3), 1.22-1.32 (m, 8, CH,), 1.57 (m, 4, CH2),2.72 (t,J = 7.6 Hz, 2, CH,); 13C NMR (50 MHz) 6 13.9, 22.4, 22.7, 31.3, 36.0, 200.2. 2-Acetoxycyclohexanone: bp 114-116 "C (9 mm) (lit.= bp 120-123 OC (12 mm)). Benzil mp 94-95 OC (lit." mp 95 OC). Registry No. la, 112-42-5; lj, 10596-05-1; 2a, 112-44-7; 2j, 38199-585; 3a, 42231-61-8; 4a,98-52-23 5a, 9853-3; 6a, 322526-1; 6b, 132207-240;6c, 3807871-6; 6d, 95407-69-5;6e, 2564-83-2; 6f, 2516-92-9; Sa, 132207-25-1; 8b, 2154-33-8; 11, 1565-81-7; 12, 928-80-3; CHpClp,75-09-2; NaBr, 7647-15-6; KBr, 7758-02-3; NH,Br, 12124-97-9;LiCI, 7447-41-8; NaCl, 7647-14-5; Br,, 772695-6; Br+, 22541-56-6; C, 7440-44-0; 2-phenylethanol, 60-12-8; 4-(benzyloxy)butanol, 4541-14-4;4-nitrobenzyl alcohol, 619-73-8; 3-methoxybenzylalcohol, 6971-51-3; 3-phenoxybenzyl alcohol, 13826-352; 2-tetradecynol, 51309-22-9; 2-ethyl-3-hydroxyhex01, 94-96-2; 2 4 1-hydroxycyclohexyl)propanol, 90676-81-6; 1,4-butanediol, 110-63-4;1,5-pentanediol,111-29-5;phenylacetaldehyde, 122-78-1;4-(benzyloxy)butanal,5470-84-8; 4-nitrobenzaldehyde, 555-16-8; 3-methoxybenzaldehyde, 591-31-1; 4-bromo-3-methoxybenzaldehyde,43192-34-3;3-phenoxybeddehyde, 3951551-0; 2-tetradecynal, 101098-99-1;2-ethyl-3-hydroxyhexanal, 496-03-7; 2-(l-hydroxycyclohexyl)propanal, 123903-25-3; 2H-2-oxotetrahydrofuran, 96-48-0; 2H-2-oxo-tetrahydropyran, 542-28-9; 1,12dodecanediol, 5675-51-4; 1-(2-hydroxyethy1)-3-(l-hydroxyethyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclobutane, 22630-96-2;2-undecanol, 165330-1; 6-undecanol,23708-56-7; 1-phenylethanol,98-85-1; 6,7-dodecanediol, 91635-53-9; 2-acetoxycyclohexano1, 22241-34-5; 2hydroxy-1,2-diphenylethanone,119-53-9; 1,12-dodecanedial, 38279-34-4; 3-(l-hydroxyethyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclobutanal, 72257-92-2; cis-3-acetyl-2,2-dimethylcyclobutanal,58558-22-8; 2-undecanone, 112-12-9; 6-undecanone, 927-49-1; l-phenylethanone, 98-86-2; 6,7-dodecanedione, 13757-90-9; 2-acetoxycyclohexanone, 17472-04-7;benzil, 134-81-6. (26) Man, E. H.; Hauser, C. R. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1950, 72, 3294. (27) Burki, A. R.; Prestone, J. S. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1975,37,2187. (28) Williamson, K.L.; Keller, R. T.;Fonken, G. S.; Szmuszkovicz, J.; Johnson, W. S. J. Org.Chem. 1962,27, 1612. (29) Limpricht, H.; Schwanert, H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1868,145,330.
