Subscriber access provided by University of South Dakota
Article
Internalization of methotrexate conjugates by folate receptor-# Eugénia Nogueira, Marisa P. Sárria, Nuno Gonçalo Azoia, Egipto Ferreira Antunes, Ana Loureiro, Diana Guimarães, Jennifer Noro, Alexandra Rollett, Georg M. Guebitz, and Artur Cavaco-Paulo Biochemistry, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00607 • Publication Date (Web): 19 Nov 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 20, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
Internalization of methotrexate conjugates by folate
2
receptor-α
3
Eugénia Nogueira, § ‡ Marisa P. Sárria, §,¥ †‡ Nuno G. Azoia, § ψ‡ Egipto Antunes, §Ana Loureiro,
4
§
5
Paulo§ *
6
§
7
Portugal
8
¥
9
of Minho, Campus of Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
Diana Guimarães, § Jennifer Noro, § Alexandra Rollett,Փ Georg Guebitz,Փ and Artur Cavaco-
Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus of Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga,
Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), Department of Biology, University
10
Փ
11
Vienna, A-3430 Tulln, Austria
Institute for Environmental Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences,
12
13
ABSTRACT
14
The folate antagonist methotrexate is a cytotoxic drug used in the treatment of several cancer types.
15
Methotrexate entry into the cell is mediated by two main transport systems: the reduced folate
16
carrier and membrane-associated folate receptors. These transporters differ considerably in their
17
mechanism of (anti)folate uptake, substrate specificity and tissue specificity. Although the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
1
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 2 of 32
1
mechanism of action of the reduced folate carrier is fairly well-established, that of the folate
2
receptor has remained doubtful. The development of specific folate receptor-targeted antifolates
3
would be accelerated if additional mechanistic data becomes available. In this work, we used two
4
fluorescent-labeled conjugates of methotrexate, differently linked at the terminal groups, to clarify
5
the uptake mechanism by the folate receptor-α. The results demonstrate the importance of
6
methotrexate amino groups in the interaction with the folate receptor-α.
7 8
Table of Contents
9 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
2
Page 3 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
INTRODUCTION
2
The folate antagonist methotrexate (MTX) was introduced in oncology as a cytotoxic
3
antiproliferative agent that has been used in the treatment of various cancer types for decades. 1 It
4
is an antimetabolite that inhibits dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which is an enzyme involved in
5
the biosynthetic pathway of nucleotides, and MTX is therefore highly toxic to rapidly dividing
6
cancer cells.2
7
The first pivotal step in the cellular pharmacology of MTX is its entry into the cell, which can be
8
mediated by two general transport systems: the reduced folate carrier (RFC) and membrane-
9
associated
folate
receptors
(FRs).
These
transport
routes
are
physiologically
and
10
pharmacologically relevant for immunocompetent cells because they facilitate the uptake of
11
natural reduced folate cofactors and folate antagonists, such as MTX.3 The RFC and FRs differ
12
considerably in their mechanism of (anti)folate uptake (transmembrane carrier versus
13
endocytosis), substrate specificity (low-affinity folic acid/high-affinity MTX versus high-affinity
14
folic acid/low-affinity MTX), and tissue specificity (constitutive versus restricted expression)
15
(Figure 1).
16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
3
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 4 of 32
1 2
Figure 1. Schematic representation of folate receptor-mediated endocytosis and methotrexate
3
influx. The folic acid has a 100-200 times greater affinity to the folate receptor than to the reduced
4
folate carrier. Inversely, the reduced folate carrier-binding affinity to methotrexate is higher.
5 6
The membrane-spanning anion transporter RFC, has a constitutive expression in essentially all
7
human tissues, providing a high-affinity bi-directional exchange mechanism for reduced-folate
8
cofactors and MTX (Km of 1-10 μM). Inversely, the RFC-binding affinity to folic acid is low (Ki
9
of 200-400 μM).4-5
10
A second folate transport mechanism is mediated by FR, a particulate form of folate binding
11
proteins, which are anchored to the cell membrane by glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) residues.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
4
Page 5 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
FRs have a mass of 38–40 kDa and are coded by two genes (FR α and β) with differential tissue
2
expression. The α- isoform of FR is overexpressed in specific types of cancer (e.g. ovarian
3
cancer),6 while the β isoform on activated macrophages.7 The third member of this gene family, γ-
4
type, is a secretory protein, from hematopoietic cells, due to the lack of signal for GPI attachment.8
5
Unlike RFC, FR exhibits a much greater affinity for folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (Kd
6
1–10 nM), but lower for other reduced folates and MTX (Kd 10–300 nM). FR also have different
7
properties in terms of energy, ion, and pH dependence.4 Folate binding to FR is decreased after
8
energy depletion and in absence of chloride anion, but does not diminish until the pH falls below
9
5.0.9
10
The functional activity of the RFC-mediated cellular traffic of antifolates with antitumor activity
11
in vivo is fairly well-established.5 On the contrary, the exact role and mechanism of action of the
12
FRα has remained unclear.10 In 2013, the structure-activity relationship for molecular (high-
13
affinity) recognition of folate and folate-conjugates by FRα was disclosed.11 It was demonstrated
14
that FRα has a globular structure stabilized by eight disulphide bonds and contains a folate-binding
15
pocket formed of conserved residues (across all receptor subtypes).11 The molecular model unveils
16
that glutamate moiety is solvent-exposed and projects from the receptor’s pocket entrance,
17
enabling cargo attachment without obstructing FRα binding.11 This structure helps explain the low-
18
MTX binding affinity to FRα, since it shows that there is a steric impediment of a specific amino
19
group that interferes with the binding to the receptor.
20
Knowing the molecular recognition details, and considering that MTX is transported into cells via
21
the FR rather than through facilitative transporters (expressed in normal tissues), damage to normal
22
cells is not expectable.12 Therefore, FRα-targeted therapy should focus on overcoming affinity and
23
specificity to MTX, over RFC. This could be achieved through engineering of molecules that take
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
5
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 6 of 32
1
advantage of the many solvent-filled cavities that surround ligands in the folate receptor binding
2
cleft.12
3
In the present study, we elucidate the uptake mechanism of MTX by the FRα. Two fluorescently
4
labelled conjugates of MTX, differently linked at the terminal groups, were used for cellular
5
uptake, and molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to validate
6
their findings.
7 8
METHODS
9
Fluorescent labeling of MTX
10
MTX was labeled with the amino-reactive fluorescent dye Red Mega 520 NHS-ester (fluorescent
11
red), as previously described for folic acid.13 Briefly, 140 μl of MTX-solution (3.7 mg/ml in a 3:1
12
mixture of 50 mM bicarbonate buffer, pH 9 and DMF) were mixed with 28 μl of fluorescent red
13
solution (20 mg/ml in DMF), and 200 μl of DMF were added. The mixture was shaken for 4 h at
14
25°C under light protection. The product was purified by size exclusion chromatography using a
15
HiTrap Desalting column (GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, Vienna, Austria) installed on an Äkta
16
Purifier system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), with 50 mM potassium
17
phosphate plus 100 mM NaCl, pH7 as eluent, at the flow rate of 1 ml/min, to remove excess
18
fluorescent red. Fractions, which showed absorbance at 520 nm for fluorescent red, and 368 nm
19
for MTX, were collected. Electro spray ionization (ESI) was performed in a mass detector Thermo
20
Finnigan LxQ (Linear Ion Trap). Mass detector susceptible of analysis in full scan mode, SIM and
21
MS/MS with negative ionization. Mass spectra range was between 50 and 2000. Capillary voltage
22
was used as 29 V. MTX concentrations were determined photometrically by comparison with a
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
6
Page 7 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
calibration curve. According to manufacturer instructions (Sigma-Aldrich Co.; Saint Louis, MO,
2
USA), fluorescent Mega dyes have a large stoke’s shift among excitation and emission maxima,
3
compatible to the same excitations conditions (light source or filter arrangement) than the
4
fluorescent green fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). As so, the commercial fluorescent green
5
conjugate of MTX (Molecular Probes® ׀Life Technologies), linked through the carboxyl groups,
6
was further considered for the cellular uptake experiments.
7 8
Cell culture conditions
9
The epithelial cancer cell line KB (ATCC®CCL-17™), and the human melanoma cells MDA-
10
MB-435S (ATCC®HTB-129™) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. KB
11
cell line was maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 Medium (without folic
12
acid) containing 2 mM of L-glutamine, 2 mg/mL sodium bicarbonate supplemented with 10%
13
(v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin solution. MDA-MB-435S
14
cell line was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) containing 4 mM L-
15
glutamine, 4.5 g/L glucose and 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate supplemented with 10% (v/v) of FBS
16
and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin solution. Cells were maintained at 37 ºC in a humidified
17
atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cells were routinely subcultured over 2/3 days.
18 19
FR confirmation by real-time qPCR
20
Cell lysates of different-origin cancer lines were collected and total RNA was extracted using the
21
“SV Total RNA Isolation System”, according to the manufacture’s protocol (Promega
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
7
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 8 of 32
1
Corporation, USA). Following column elution with 30 μl of RNase-free water, RNA concentration
2
was determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm in a NanoDrop ND-1000
3
spectrophotometer (A260=1↔40μg/ml) (Nanodrop Technologies, USA). The ratio A260/ A280
4
was calculated to estimate RNA purity. Reverse transcription was performed using the “iScriptTM
5
cDNA synthesis kit” (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). Unique blended oligo(dT) and random
6
hexamer primers were incubated according to the manufacturer’s protocol as follows: 5 min at
7
25ºC, 60 min at 42ºC, 5 min at 85ºC and hold at 4ºC. For confirmation of FRα and RFC expression
8
levels, TaqMan® probe-based Gene Expression assays (Applied Biosystems®, Spain) were
9
considered: ID Hs01124177_m1 and Hs00953345_m1, respectively. Real-time qPCR reactions
10
were performed in CFX96™ Real-Time PCR Detection System, C1000TM thermal cycler (Bio-
11
Rad Laboratories, USA). The amplification process used the following conditions: UNG
12
incubation 50 ºC 2 min, polymerase activation 95 °C 10 min, denaturation 95 °C 15 s,
13
annealing/extension 60 °C 60 s, for 50 cycles (data collection). A stable endogenous control gene,
14
the Cyclin-dependent kinase Inhibitor 1A, CDKN1A (TaqMan® assays ID Hs00355782_m1;
15
Applied Biosystems®, Spain), was used for normalization of the expression values.
16 17
Uptake experiments
18
The FRα positive cells (KB cancer cell line), and MDA-MB-435S cells (negative control) were
19
harvest from the culture vessel during their S-phase (i.e. until a monolayer, with confluence greater
20
than 60%, was obtained), and seeded at a density of 100 000 cells/mL (24-wells microplates) for
21
the uptake experiments. After an overnight period to ensure optimal adhesion, the culture medium
22
was removed, and adherent cells were washed twice with acidic phosphate-buffered saline (pH
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
8
Page 9 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
3.5) to remove bound folic acid. The MTX conjugates were diluted in Hanks' balanced salt solution
2
(folate free), at a non-toxic (data not shown) concentration of 6 μM (adjusted for antifolate
3
concentration), and incubated in cancer cells during 4 h. The same experiment was repeated using
4
media containing 113 μM free folic acid (Sigma) and calcium folinate (TCI) to determine the effect
5
of FR and RFC blockade, respectively. The cultures were maintained under a humidified
6
atmosphere containing 5% CO2, in a 37ºC incubator. The internalized concentration of MTX
7
conjugates was determined, considering the fluorescence intensity measured (Perkin Elmer LS-
8
50B Luminescence Spectrometer) upon lysis of the exposed-cells. All values were corrected by
9
the ratio intensity/molarity, according calibration curves of fluorescent-labeled conjugates.
10 11
Molecular Docking Simulations
12
The computational models of the FRα, RFC and MTX have different origins. The FRα model
13
corresponds to the 4KM6 entry on RCSB protein databank,14 that is an X-ray diffraction of human
14
FRα (FOLR1) at acidic pH. The software Modeller (https://salilab.org/modeller)15 was used to
15
obtain a 3D model of RFC protein, through homology with a structure of a transmembranar glucose
16
transporter obtained by X-ray diffraction (4ZW9 entry on RSCB protein databank),16 due to the
17
non-existence of a full crystallographic model of RFC. Finally, the MTX structure was obtained
18
using
19
(https://atb.uq.edu.au/)17 using AM1 optimized geometry and MOPAC charges.
20
The models of FRα, RFC and MTX were preprocessed with Autodock tools18 to correct the
21
charges, the hydrogens and the bonds flexibility when needed. Later, Autodock Vina19 was used
22
to perform the docking simulations between the FRα and MTX, as well as between RFC and MTX
the
“Automated
Topology
Builder
(ATB)
and
Repository”
online
server
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
9
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 10 of 32
1
to evaluate the binding affinity between them. All docking calculations were performed with one
2
box of 5x5x5 nm centered on the FR active site and the exhaustiveness was varied between 80 and
3
800.
4 5
Molecular Dynamics Simulations
6
The simulations were performed with the GROMACS 4.6.520 package using the GROMOS 54A7
7
force field.21-22 The initial configurations of the protein-MTX conjugates were the result of docking
8
simulations with higher affinity binding energies. These structures were solvated and simulated
9
during a few nanoseconds (~10ns). The bonds lengths of the proteins were constrained with
10
LINCS23 and those for water with SETTLE.24 Nonbonded interactions were calculated using a
11
twin-range method, with short and long-range cutoffs of 0.8 and 1.4 nm, respectively. Neighbor
12
searching was carried out up to 1.4 nm and updated every two steps. A time step of integration of
13
2 fentoseconds was used. A reaction field correction for the electrostatic interactions was applied
14
using a dielectric constant of 54.25 The single point charge model26 was used for water molecules.
15
The initial systems were energy minimized for 2000 steps using the steepest descent method, with
16
all heavy atoms harmonically restrained using a force constant of 10³ kJ/mol nm².
17
The systems were initialized in the canonical ensemble (NVT) for 50 picoseconds, with all heavy
18
atoms harmonically restrained using a force constant of 10³ kJ/mol nm². The simulation was then
19
continued for picoseconds in the isothermal–isobaric ensemble (NPT), with the heavy atoms
20
harmonically restrained with the same force constant. Finally, for allowing the equilibration of the
21
system properties, the simulations were further extended in the NPT ensemble with position
22
restrains applied only to the α-carbons. Pressure control was implemented using the Berendsen
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
10
Page 11 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
barostat,27 with a reference pressure of 1 bar, 0.5 picoseconds of relaxation time, and isothermal
2
compressibility of 4.5x10⁻⁵ bar⁻¹. Temperature control was set using the V-rescale27-28 thermostat
3
at 300 K with temperatures coupling constants of 0.025 picoseconds in the first two initialization
4
steps and with 0.1 picoseconds for the rest of the simulations. At least three replica systems were
5
simulated for each condition, from 50 nanoseconds using different initial velocities taken from a
6
Maxwell–Boltzman distribution at 300k. GROMACS tools were used to evaluate several
7
properties of the systems, such as the pressure, temperature, surface accessible solvent area,
8
providing insights on the correct modeling of the proteins-MTX interaction.
9
In addition, pulling simulations were performed with FR-MTX and RFC-MTX conjugates, with a
10
constant force of 1000 KJ/mol.nm² and with 0.1 nm/ns rate applied to the MTX molecule. The
11
force applied in the MTX molecule oblige the molecule to exit from the tested proteins active-
12
sites. The MTX had its carboxyl groups termination facing the solvent in both cases. Later
13
umbrella sampling methodology29 was applied to calculate the potential of mean force for the
14
process of MTX molecules exiting the FRα and RFC proteins.
15 16
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
17
In this work, two fluorescently labeled conjugates of MTX, differently linked at the terminal
18
groups (Figure 2), were considered for cellular uptake. Since high levels of FRα were reported in
19
a wider spectrum of epithelial origin tissues,30 human epithelial adenocarcinoma cells of the
20
mammary gland were selected for exposure to the antifolate conjugates, in comparison to a
21
negative control. The FRα expression levels of the different-origin cancer cells were quantified
22
using a standardized real-time qPCR detection system. The concentration of the conjugates
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
11
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 12 of 32
1
internalized (adjusted for MTX concentration) was determined, considering the fluorescence
2
measured in the lysates of the exposed cells. To ascertain FRα “targetability”, molecular docking
3
simulations of the complex FRα/MTX were performed.
4
5
6 7
Figure 2. The (most probable) molecular structures of the tested conjugates (A) RedMega-HN-
8
MTX-COOH and (B) H2N-MTX-CO-FITC. Fluorescent red dye can also be linked to the amino
9
group marked with a circle, but since the conjugate was purified by size-exclusion
10
chromatography, the occurrence of a 2:1 (Mega dye:MTX) conjugate is excluded, as it would have
11
a larger size and therefore a shorter retention time. The MTX-Red Mega 520 conjugate was
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
12
Page 13 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
analysed by ESI and the mass peak observed (m/z= 951.02) correspond to the theoretical molecular
2
weight (data not shown). The fluorescent green dye is linked to the carboxyl groups of MTX as
3
presented, according to the manufacturer’s information (Molecular Probes® ׀Life Technologies).
4 5
This study adds information to the current understanding regarding the structural underpinnings of
6
the transport of antifolate-based derivatives. Moreover, the interference of the chemical nature of
7
their free terminal-groups on the affinity/specificity of the molecular interactions involved in their
8
cellular uptake was evaluated. The functional chemical groups of the MTX conjugates implicated
9
on the binding to the surface-associated receptor, and their potential as “tool” to surmount the
10
membrane-spanning anion transporter, avoiding significant side-effects and dose-limiting
11
toxicities, is discussed.
12
Prior to cellular uptake experiments, FRα expression levels of the different-origin human cancer
13
cells were confirmed. Real-time qPCR data analysis revealed higher expression levels of FRα in
14
the KB cancer cell line, and negligible levels in the cell line MDA-MB-435S (Figure 3A) 11.
15
Although posttranscriptional regulation can occur, previous studies show that protein expression
16
of FR31-32 and RFC33-34 in several cancer cell lines is directly proportional to mRNA levels.
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
13
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 14 of 32
1 2
Figure 3. (A) Analysis of FRα and RFC expression levels in human cancer cell lines. (B) Uptake
3
concentrations of the fluorescent-labeled MTX-conjugates by cancer cell lines: FRα-positive KB
4
and FRα-negative MDA-MB-435S. RFC expression levels and uptake of H2N-MTX-CO-FITC
5
conjugate were also analysed after incubation of cells with folic acid and calcium folinate. Values
6
are presented as mean ± standard error of two independent experiments. Differences were tested
7
for statistical significance by a one-way ANOVA (* P < 0.005, *** P < 0.001).
8 9
The uptake concentration of the MTX conjugates, differently linked at the terminal functional
10
groups, showed significant interaction among the selected factors. For FRα-positive cells, KB,
11
significant statistical differences were observed among the internalized concentration of the two
12
MTX conjugates, whereas for the FRα-negative, MDA-MB-435S, negligible differences were
13
observed (Figure 3B). Comparable amounts of both MTX conjugates, with either terminals
14
blocked, were uptaken similarly by FRα-negative cells. Noteworthy, although H2N-MTX-CO-
15
FITC internalization remains unaltered after incubation with high affinity FR substrate (folic
16
acid)35, as expected, it is possible to observe an internalization increase after incubation with high
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
14
Page 15 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
affinity RFC substrate (calcium folinate)36. Once RFC expression remains similar after incubation
2
with high affinity RFC substrate (Figure 3A), one can speculate that other uptake mechanism is
3
present or is activated in the presence of huge quantity of the calcium folinate.
4
Higher concentrations of H2N-MTX-CO-FITC conjugate were uptaken by FRα-positive cells than
5
that of RedMega-HN-MTX-COOH conjugate (Figure 3B). This result provide a proof of concept
6
of higher passage of MTX via FRα when the amino groups are free. Furthermore, as expected,
7
H2N-MTX-CO-FITC conjugate internalization decreases after incubation with high affinity FR
8
substrate, folic acid, remaining unaltered after incubation with high affinity RFC substrate, calcium
9
folinate.
10
The receptors FRα and FRβ have high sequence identity (82%) and similarity (92%), being their
11
binding sites highly conserved, with only two divergent residues (V129α/F123β and
12
K158α/R152β)12. Although we did not perform studies with cell lines expressing FRβ, a similar
13
behaviour to FRα would be expected.
14
The ability of the conjugate with free amino groups to bind to FRα was further confirmed by
15
molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations, as showed in Figure 4. Molecular docking
16
experiments initially suggested that MTX is capable to bind to FRα using either the terminal amino
17
group, Figure 4A, or the terminal carboxylic group, Figure 4B. However, stabilization of these
18
docking structures in water, using molecular dynamics simulations tools, showed that the complex
19
is stable only if the amino groups are facing the FRα pocket and not the opposite.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
15
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 16 of 32
1 2
Figure 4. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation. (A) Docking result showing
3
MTX at the active site of the FRα with the amino groups facing the protein. The docking result
4
was the start point of the molecular dynamics. (B) Docking result showing MTX at the active site
5
of the FRα with the carbonyl groups facing the protein. The docking result was the start point of
6
the molecular dynamics. (C) System A after a simulation run of 1ns to unsure stabilization. This
7
was the starting point of the umbrella pulling procedure. (D) System B after a simulation run of
8
1ns to unsure stabilization. The configuration derived from the docking was not stable, and after a
9
short simulation MTX in no longer at the active site of the receptor.
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
16
Page 17 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
Taking into account the molecular dynamics simulations, the binding energy between the two
2
transport systems and MTX was calculated, using umbrella sampling technic to calculate the
3
potential of mean force. The final result demonstrate that the complex among MTX and RFC is
4
stronger, with a binding energy of approximately 65 Kcal mol-1, comparatively with FRα, which
5
binding energy is approximately 15 Kcal mol-1 (Figure 5).
6
7 8
Figure 5. Potential of mean force of MTX with RFC and FRα.
9 10
In summary, the obtained outcomes provide a rationale stand for designing more specific drugs
11
for selective approaches. Modulation of the MTX terminal groups might be a potentially useful
12
strategy for improved mediated transport targeting through FRα system on cancer cells (Figure 6).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
17
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 18 of 32
1
Major outcomes anticipated from this study are the development of the next generation of FR-
2
targeted therapeutics.
3
4 5
Figure 6.
6
mechanisms of MTX conjugates, in FRα-negative and -positive cells.
Schematic representation of the proposed mechanism showing internalization
7 8
AUTHOR INFORMATION
9
Corresponding Author
10
*E-mail:
[email protected].
11
Present Addresses
12
† International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, 4715-330 Braga, Portugal
13
ψ Centre for Nanotechnology and Smart Materials (CeNTI), 4760-034, Vila Nova de Famalicão,
14
Portugal
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
18
Page 19 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
Author Contributions
2
‡These authors contributed equally.
3
Funding
4
Egipto Antunes (SFRH/BD/122952/2016) and Jennifer Noro (SFRH/BD/121673/2016) holds
5
scholarships from Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). This study was
6
supported by the FCT under the scope of the strategic funding of UID/BIO/04469/2013 unit and
7
COMPETE 2020 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684) and BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-
8
0145-FEDER-000004) funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the scope of
9
Norte2020 - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte. This work has also received funding from
10
the European Union 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), under grant agreement NMP4-
11
LA-2009-228827 NANOFOL and Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant
12
agreement NMP-06-2015- 683356 FOLSMART.
13
Notes
14
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
15 16
REFERENCES
17
(1)
18
Intermittent parenteral vs daily oral administration of methotrexate for maintenance of induced
19
remission. JAMA 194 (1), 75-81.
20
(2)
21
Clin. Pharmacol. 47 (2), 131-143.
(1965) New treatment schedule with improved survival in childhood leukemia:
Lennard, L. (1999) Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimetabolic cytotoxic drugs. Br. J.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
19
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 20 of 32
1
(3)
2
Lems, W. F., Jackman, A. L., Kraan, M. C., Tak, P. P., Ratnam, M.and Jansen, G. (2009) Folate
3
receptor β as a potential delivery route for novel folate antagonists to macrophages in the
4
synovial tissue of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum. 60 (1), 12-21.
5
(4)
6
antifolate membrane transport. Acta Biochim. Pol. 47 (3), 735-49.
7
(5)
8
66, 403-56.
9
(6)
Van Der Heijden, J. W., Oerlemans, R., Dijkmans, B. A. C., Qi, H., Laken, C. J. V. D.,
Brzezinska, A., Winska, P.and Balinska, M. (2000) Cellular aspects of folate and
Matherly, L. H.and Goldman, D. I. (2003) Membrane transport of folates. Vitam. Horm.
Salazar, M. D.and Ratnam, M. (2007) The folate receptor: what does it promise in tissue-
10
targeted therapeutics? Cancer Metastasis Rev. 26 (1), 141-52.
11
(7)
12
Imaging Agents To Target Alternatively Activated Macrophages in a Murine Model of Asthma.
13
Mol. Pharm. 10 (5), 1918-1927.
14
(8)
15
receptor, a truncated receptor, and receptor type beta in hematopoietic cells: cDNA cloning,
16
expression, immunoreactivity, and tissue specificity. Biochemistry (Mosc). 33 (5), 1209-15.
17
(9)
18
between folate receptor-alpha-mediated transport and reduced folate carrier-mediated transport
19
in L1210 leukemia cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270 (14), 7842-9.
20
(10)
21
(1), 153-181.
Shen, J., Chelvam, V., Cresswell, G.and Low, P. S. (2013) Use of Folate-Conjugated
Shen, F., Ross, J. F., Wang, X.and Ratnam, M. (1994) Identification of a novel folate
Spinella, M. J., Brigle, K. E., Sierra, E. E.and Goldman, I. D. (1995) Distinguishing
Assaraf, Y. (2007) Molecular basis of antifolate resistance. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
20
Page 21 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
(11)
2
Melcher, K. (2013) Structural basis for molecular recognition of folic acid by folate receptors.
3
Nature 500 (7463), 486-489.
4
(12)
5
Ratnam, M., Zhang, F.and Dann, C. E. (2013) Structures of human folate receptors reveal
6
biological trafficking states and diversity in folate and antifolate recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad.
7
Sci. 110 (38), 15180-15188.
8
(13)
9
Paulo, A., Moreira, A., Carmo, A. M.and Guebitz, G. M. (2012) Folic acid-functionalized human
Chen, C., Ke, J., Zhou, X. E., Yi, W., Brunzelle, J. S., Li, J., Yong, E.-L., Xu, H. E.and
Wibowo, A. S., Singh, M., Reeder, K. M., Carter, J. J., Kovach, A. R., Meng, W.,
Rollett, A., Reiter, T., Nogueira, P., Cardinale, M., Loureiro, A., Gomes, A., Cavaco-
10
serum albumin nanocapsules for targeted drug delivery to chronically activated macrophages.
11
Int. J. Pharm. 427 (2), 460-466.
12
(14)
13
Ratnam, M., Zhang, F.and Dann, C. E., 3rd (2013) Structures of human folate receptors reveal
14
biological trafficking states and diversity in folate and antifolate recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad.
15
Sci. U. S. A. 110 (38), 15180-8.
16
(15)
17
Y., Pieper, U.and Sali, A. (2006) Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller.
18
Current protocols in bioinformatics Chapter 5, Unit-5.6.
19
(16)
20
M., Fan, S.and Yan, N. (2015) Molecular basis of ligand recognition and transport by glucose
21
transporters. Nature 526 (7573), 391-6.
Wibowo, A. S., Singh, M., Reeder, K. M., Carter, J. J., Kovach, A. R., Meng, W.,
Eswar, N., Webb, B., Marti-Renom, M. A., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eramian, D., Shen, M.
Deng, D., Sun, P., Yan, C., Ke, M., Jiang, X., Xiong, L., Ren, W., Hirata, K., Yamamoto,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
21
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 22 of 32
1
(17)
2
Mark, A. E. (2011) An Automated Force Field Topology Builder (ATB) and Repository: Version
3
1.0. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7 (12), 4026-4037.
4
(18)
5
Olson, A. J. (2009) AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective
6
receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 30 (16), 2785-91.
7
(19)
8
docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading. J. Comput.
9
Chem. 31 (2), 455-461.
Malde, A. K., Zuo, L., Breeze, M., Stroet, M., Poger, D., Nair, P. C., Oostenbrink, C.and
Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S.and
Trott, O.and Olson, A. J. (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of
10
(20)
11
Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. J Chem
12
Theory Comput 4 (3), 435-47.
13
(21)
14
Interaction Parameters for Oxygen Compounds in the GROMOS Force Field: Improved Pure-
15
Liquid and Solvation Properties for Alcohols, Ethers, Aldehydes, Ketones, Carboxylic Acids,
16
and Esters. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7 (4), 1016-1031.
17
(22)
18
van Gunsteren, W. F. (2011) Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7
19
and 54B7. Eur. Biophys. J. 40 (7), 843-56.
20
(23)
21
Solver for molecular simulations. 1998; Vol. 18.
22
(24)
23
RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. 1992; Vol. 13, p 952-962.
Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D.and Lindahl, E. (2008) GROMACS 4:
Horta, B. A. C., Fuchs, P. F. J., van Gunsteren, W. F.and Hünenberger, P. H. (2011) New
Schmid, N., Eichenberger, A. P., Choutko, A., Riniker, S., Winger, M., Mark, A. E.and
Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H.and G. E. M. Fraaije, J., LINCS: A Linear Constraint
Miyamoto, S.and A. Kollman, P., Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
22
Page 23 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
1
(25)
2
charge and extended simple point charge water models at 277 and 300 K. 1994; Vol. 100, p
3
3169-3174.
4
(26)
5
consistent empirical potential for water–protein interactions. Biopolymers 23 (8), 1513-1518.
6
(27)
7
(1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. The Journal of Chemical Physics
8
81 (8), 3684-3690.
9
(28)
E. Smith, P.and van Gunsteren, W., Consistent dielectric properties of the simple point
Hermans, J., Berendsen, H. J. C., Gunsteren, W. F. V.and Postma, J. P. M. (1984) A
Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A.and Haak, J. R.
Bussi, G., Donadio, D.and Parrinello, M. (2007) Canonical sampling through velocity
10
rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126 (1), 014101.
11
(29)
12
Protofibrils Using Molecular Dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 114 (4), 1652-
13
1660.
14
(30)
15
G., Meyers, P. A.and Gorlick, R. (2007) The folate receptor alpha is frequently overexpressed in
16
osteosarcoma samples and plays a role in the uptake of the physiologic substrate 5-
17
methyltetrahydrofolate. Clni. Cancer Res. 13 (9), 2557-67.
18
(31)
19
Mitra, A. (2015) Functional characterization and expression of folate receptor-β in T47D human
20
breast cancer cells. Drug Development and Therapeutics 6 (2), 52-61.
21
(32)
22
Wang, Y. (2017) Folate receptor-targeted ultrasonic PFOB nanoparticles: Synthesis,
23
characterization and application in tumor-targeted imaging. Int. J. Mol. Med. 39 (6), 1505-1515.
Lemkul, J. A.and Bevan, D. R. (2010) Assessing the Stability of Alzheimer’s Amyloid
Yang, R., Kolb, E. A., Qin, J., Chou, A., Sowers, R., Hoang, B., Healey, J. H., Huvos, A.
Renukuntla, J., Shah, S., Boddu, S. H. S., Vadlapudi, A., Vadlapatla, R., Pal, D.and
Li, K., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Xu, Y., Jiang, J., Yin, F., Hu, Y., Han, B., Ge, S., Zhang, L.and
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
23
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
(33)
2
human reduced folate carrier as a novel adaptive mechanism in response to folate excess or
3
deficiency. Biosci. Rep. 34 (4), e00130.
4
(34)
5
responsiveness and resistance in colon cancer cells. 2005; Vol. 24, p 6842-7.
6
(35)
7
paclitaxel. Int. J. Pharm. 316 (1–2), 148-153.
8
(36)
9
Cytotoxic to Cells under Conditions of Severe Folate Deprivation: RFC AS A DOUBLE
Page 24 of 32
Hou, Z., Orr, S.and Matherly, Larry H. (2014) Post-transcriptional regulation of the
Morales, C., Ribas, M., Aiza, G.and Peinado, M., Genetic determinants of methotrexate
Wu, J., Liu, Q.and Lee, R. J. (2006) A folate receptor-targeted liposomal formulation for
Ifergan, I., Jansen, G.and Assaraf, Y. G. (2008) The Reduced Folate Carrier (RFC) Is
10
EDGED SWORD IN FOLATE HOMEOSTASIS. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 283 (30),
11
20687-20695.
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
24
Page 25 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
Figure 1. Schematic representation of folate receptor-mediated endocytosis and methotrexate influx. The folic acid has a 100-200 times greater affinity to the folate receptor than to the reduced folate carrier. Inversely, the reduced folate carrier-binding affinity to methotrexate is higher. 296x209mm (100 x 100 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Figure 2. The (most probable) molecular structures of the tested conjugates (A) RedMega-HN-MTX-COOH and (B) H2N-MTX-CO-FITC. Fluorescent red dye can also be linked to the amino group marked with a circle, but since the conjugate was purified by size-exclusion chromatography, the occurrence of a 2:1 (Mega dye:MTX) conjugate is excluded, as it would have a larger size and therefore a shorter retention time. The MTX-Red Mega 520 conjugate was analysed by ESI and the mass peak observed (m/z= 951.02) correspond to the theoretical molecular weight (data not shown). The fluorescent green dye is linked to the carboxyl groups of MTX as presented, according to the manufacturer’s information (Molecular Probes® ׀Life Technologies). 260x100mm (96 x 96 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 32
Page 27 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
Figure 2. The (most probable) molecular structures of the tested conjugates (A) RedMega-HN-MTX-COOH and (B) H2N-MTX-CO-FITC. Fluorescent red dye can also be linked to the amino group marked with a circle, but since the conjugate was purified by size-exclusion chromatography, the occurrence of a 2:1 (Mega dye:MTX) conjugate is excluded, as it would have a larger size and therefore a shorter retention time. The MTX-Red Mega 520 conjugate was analysed by ESI and the mass peak observed (m/z= 951.02) correspond to the theoretical molecular weight (data not shown). The fluorescent green dye is linked to the carboxyl groups of MTX as presented, according to the manufacturer’s information (Molecular Probes® ׀Life Technologies). 260x100mm (96 x 96 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Figure 3. (A) Analysis of FRα and RFC expression levels in human cancer cell lines. (B) Uptake concentrations of the fluorescent-labeled MTX-conjugates by cancer cell lines: FRα-positive KB and FRαnegative MDA-MB-435S. RFC expression levels and uptake of H2N-MTX-CO-FITC conjugate were also analysed after incubation of cells with folic acid and calcium folinate. Values are presented as mean ± standard error of two independent experiments. Differences were tested for statistical significance by a oneway ANOVA (* P < 0.005, *** P < 0.001). 113x93mm (300 x 300 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 32
Page 29 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
Figure 3. (A) Analysis of FRα and RFC expression levels in human cancer cell lines. (B) Uptake concentrations of the fluorescent-labeled MTX-conjugates by cancer cell lines: FRα-positive KB and FRαnegative MDA-MB-435S. RFC expression levels and uptake of H2N-MTX-CO-FITC conjugate were also analysed after incubation of cells with folic acid and calcium folinate. Values are presented as mean ± standard error of two independent experiments. Differences were tested for statistical significance by a oneway ANOVA (* P < 0.005, *** P < 0.001). 108x94mm (300 x 300 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Figure 4. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation. (A) Docking result showing MTX at the active site of the FRα with the amino groups facing the protein. The docking result was the start point of the molecular dynamics. (B) Docking result showing MTX at the active site of the FRα with the carbonyl groups facing the protein. The docking result was the start point of the molecular dynamics. (C) System A after a simulation run of 1ns to unsure stabilization. This was the starting point of the umbrella pulling procedure. (D) System B after a simulation run of 1ns to unsure stabilization. The configuration derived from the docking was not stable, and after a short simulation MTX in no longer at the active site of the receptor. 199x173mm (300 x 300 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 32
Page 31 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Biochemistry
Figure 5. Potential of mean force of MTX with RFC and FRα. 359x198mm (100 x 100 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Biochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Figure 6. Schematic representation of the proposed mechanism showing internalization mechanisms of MTX conjugates, in FRα-negative and -positive cells. 199x80mm (100 x 100 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 32 of 32