Subscriber access provided by NEW YORK UNIV
Article
Intimate coupling of photocatalysis and biodegradation for degrading phenol using different light types: visible light vs. UV light Dandan Zhou, Zhengxue Xu, Shanshan Dong, Ming-xin Huo, Shuangshi Dong, Bin Cui, Xiadi Tian, Houfeng Xiong, and Tingting Li Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 15 Jun 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 15, 2015
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
1 2 3 4
Intimate coupling of photocatalysis and biodegradation for degrading phenol using different light types: visible light vs. UV light
5 6
Dandan Zhou†‡, Zhengxue, Xu†, Shanshan Dong†, Mingxin Huo*‡, Shuangshi
7
Dong*†§, Xiadi Tian†, Bin Cui†, Houfeng Xiong†, Tingting Li†, Dongmei Ma†
8 9 10
†
Key Lab of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin
University, Changchun 130021, China
11 12
‡
School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China
§
State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of
13 14 15
Technology (SKLUWRE, HIT), Harbin 150090, China
16 17
ABSTRACT
18
Intimate coupling of photocatalysis and biodegradation (ICPB) technology is
19
attractive for phenolic wastewater treatment, but has only been investigated using UV
20
light (called UPCB). We examined the intimate coupling of visible-light-induced
21
photocatalysis and biodegradation (VPCB) for the first time. Our catalyst was
22
prepared doping both of Er3+ and YAlO3 into TiO2 which were supported on A
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 31
Page 3 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
macroporous carriers. The macroporous carriers was used to support for the biofilms
2
as well. 99.8% removal efficiency of phenol was achieved in the VPCB, and this was
3
32.6% higher than that in the UPCB. Mineralization capability of UPCB was even
4
worse, due to less adsorbable intermediates and cell lysis induced soluble microbial
5
products release. The lower phenol degradation in the UPCB was due to the serious
6
detachment of the biofilms, and then the microbes responsible for phenol degradation
7
were insufficient due to disinfection by UV irradiation. In contrast, microbial
8
communities in the carriers were well protected under visible light irradiation and
9
extracellular polymeric substances secretion was enhanced. Thus, we found that the
10
photocatalytic reaction and biodegradation were intimately coupled in the VPCB,
11
resulting in 64.0% removal of dissolved organic carbon. Therefore, we found visible
12
light has some advantages over UV light in the ICPB technology.
13 14
15
Phenolic compounds are bio-recalcitrant organic pollutants, and they are common
16
components of some industrial wastewaters, such as oil refining, coking plants, steel
17
industry, ceramic industry, and textile processing wastewaters 1,2. Advanced oxidation
18
processes (AOPs) are techniques that are effective at degrading phenol, but it is
19
difficult to achieve the full mineralization 1,3,4. Although biological treatment has been
20
used as cost-efficient technique for many years
21
phenolic compounds which are bio-recalcitrant. Thus, combined treatment processes
22
have been proposed to degrade phenol, such as, AOP followed by a biological
INTRODUCTION
1,5
, they are limited to degrading
B
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 4 of 31
1
treatment 4 or a biological treatment followed by an AOP 6-8. Several problems exist
2
when using combined treatment. First, AOPs rely on hydroxyl radical reactions,
3
which are indiscriminate, and some less biodegradable products can be formed.
4
Second, we should oxidize the organics only to the degree that they are easily
5
biodegraded and not overly oxidized which would waste energy and/or oxidizing
6
chemicals 3. Third, it may difficult to achieve the special conditions that is required by
7
AOPs (for example, the proper pH and/or low turbidity).
8
A novel alternative to the sequential combined treatments is the intimate coupling
9
of photocatalysis and biodegradation (ICPB), which was firstly proposed by Marsolek
10
et al 9. For the ICPB, macroporous biofilm-carrier sponge cubes with 3.5 - 4.0 mm in
11
side length were coated by TiO2 and were used to accumulate biomass. TiO2
12
photocatalysis produced free radicals that transformed the phenolic compound into
13
more easily bio-consumable intermediates. These bio-consumable intermediates were
14
degraded by the attached biomass in a single reactor. And then the ICPB process was
15
investigated with the aim of enhancing the removal of phenolic organics
16
complex compounds
17
carrier cube was free of bacterial cells due to the participation of photocatalytic
18
reaction. And only some bacteria inside the macroporous carrier were alive, growing
19
as a biofilm, and metabolically active. The protected biofilm that remained had a
20
substantial substrate removal capacity in the ICPB process and was found to be the
21
main contributor to the removal of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) or dissolved
22
organic carbon (DOC) 1, 3,9.
10, 11
1
and even
from wastewater. It was found that the exterior face of the
C
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
In fact, UV light, which accounts for less than 4% of the entire solar spectrum 12,
2
is the only light source that has been used for previous ICPB studies. Exposure to UV
3
light will definitely destroy biofilm on the exterior of the carriers, and could
4
potentially affect the biofilm in the interior of the carrier. For the ICPB that used UV
5
light, detached biofilms was found suspending in the bulk water and this interfered
6
with irradiance of the photocatalyst, wasted energy, and degraded the reactor
7
performance. Worse yet, soluble microbial products (SMPs) could potentially release
8
to the effluent from an intimate coupling of UV photolysis/photocatalysis and
9
biodegradation (UPCB), due to the attack of the strong free radicals on the biofilms.
10
Actually, higher DOC concentrations were found in the UPCB effluent than using
11
photodegradation alone 9, even though most of present publications revealed that
12
biofilms could be well protected in the porous carriers with size of 3.5-8.0 mm (see
13
Table S1). But, smaller carrier is expected to be employed, which could take greater
14
surface-area-to-volume ratio to achieve more exposure of catalysts on the carrier
15
surface. Thus, ICPB, a novel attractive process, still meets many challenges, such as
16
high operational energy, and even potentially SMP releasing if small carrier applied.
17
Indeed, UV light employed in the ICPB system led to these problems.
18
Visible light photocatalysis has recently attracted a lot of attention
13-15
. Good
19
degradation efficiencies have been achieved for many kinds of inhibitory or
20
recalcitrant pollutants using visible light photocatalysis, followed by a biological
21
process to enhance the mineralization of the pollutants 16. Our hypothesis is that the
D
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 6 of 31
1
problems mentioned above, could be solved by using an intimate coupling of
2
visible-light-induced photocatalysis and biodegradation.
3
In the present work, we compared the degradation of phenol using intimate
4
coupling of visible-light-induced photocatalysis and biodegradation (VPCB) and
5
ultraviolet-light-induced
6
degradation and mineralization, biofilms development, extracellular polymeric
7
substances distributions and microbial community changes were examined, and the
8
advantages of using VPCB over using UPCB were determined. The results were also
9
directly compared with those findings using protocols of only biodegradation,
10
visible-light photocatalysis alone or UV-light photocatalysis alone. To our best
11
knowledge, this is the first report on the use of VPCB.
12
photocatalysis
and
biodegradation
(UPCB).
Phenol
MATERIALS AND METHODS
13
Production of the synthetic wastewater containing phenol. Phenol was
14
purchased from the Beijing Chemical Works (99%, China). Synthetic wastewater was
15
prepared by adding 50 mg/L of phenol and supplemental inorganic salt to ultra-pure
16
water. The supplemental inorganic salt was composed of 29 mg/L of NH4Cl, 8 mg/L
17
of Na2HPO4·2H2O, and 4 mg/L of NaH2PO4.
18
Sponge cube and Photocatalyst coating procedure. The sponge in this study is
19
2mm×2mm×2 mm cube and made of polyurethane. The wet density of the pristine
20
and phtocatalyst coated sponge is 0.89 and 1.04 g/mL, respectively, with 100-300 µm
21
in the pore size and 87 % in porosity. Full and close-up views of the sponge were
22
provided in Supporting Information (Figure S1). The preparation of Er3+:YAlO3/TiO2 E
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1 2
photocatalyst and its characterization has been described in our previous publication 14
. The Er3+:YAlO3/TiO2 samples were ultrasonically dispersed in C2H5OH to give a
3
17.95 g/L nanoparticle suspension. Then, 8 g of uncoated sponge carrier cubes
4
(Hayi-diverse, Yixing, China)were added to 400 mL of the coating solution, and this
5
was ultrasonically dispersed and incubated in an oven at 80 °C for 5 h (mixed every
6
30 min) until all of the liquid had evaporated, and the Er3+:YAlO3/TiO2 was coated on
7
the carriers. Finally, the coated carriers were ultrasonically treated for 5 min and
8
rinsed by deionized water. This rinsing process was repeated 3 times.
9
Biofilm cultivation procedure. Activated sludge was obtained from the underflow
10
of a secondary clarifier at the Southern Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant in
11
Changchun, China. The photocatalyst-coated carriers were immersed in the activated
12
sludge for 24 h and then the carriers were cultivated in an internal loop airlift-driven
13
reactor described in our previous publication17. The biofilms were cultivated using a
14
synthetic feed water that contained 330 mg/L of sodium acetate, 29 mg/L of NH4Cl, 8
15
mg/L of Na2HPO4·2H2O, and 4 mg/L of NaH2PO4. During cultivation, dissolved
16
oxygen was maintained at 5±1 mg/L, the temperature was kept at room temperature
17
(20±2 °C), and the cultivation time was 6 d.
18 19
Figure 1. The schematic of the photolytic circulating-bed bioreactor (PCBBR) F
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Photolytic circulating-bed bioreactor (PCBBR) setup and operation. The PCBBR
2
was an internal loop airlift-driven reactor with a working volume of 540 mL (see
3
Figure 1), which was filled in around 750 carriers and operated at room temperature.
4
The draft tube section of PCBBR was a plexiglass tube with a diameter of 40 mm and
5
a height of 130 mm, and an aeration disc diffuser with a diameter of 40 mm was
6
mounted at the bottom of the draft tube. The annular section was an annular quartz
7
tube, with an inner diameter of 70 mm and a total height of 180 mm, through which
8
the liquid mixture flowed down to be recycled into the draft tube section. Air was
9
supplied by a 35 W aeration pump (SOBO, Weifang, China), resulting in an aeration
10
rate of 480 g O2/ (g phenol • h) and an air superficial velocity in the draft tube of 10.6
11
mm/s. The PCBBR was illuminated by a UV lamp (6 W, giving peak emission at 254
12
nm; Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) or with visible light from an LED panel (42
13
W; giving wavelength range of 420-700 nm; Hueler, Guangdong, China). The light
14
intensities reached at the outer wall of the reactor for UV and visible light
15
(wavelength between 420 to 700 nm) are 1.26 and 43.13 mW/cm2 in this study, which
16
are very close to the values for those in the standard solar light intensity (see details
17
given in Supporting Information SI-1). The corresponding incident light intensities
18
h=6.6260693 =6.6260693 were 3.93×10 10-7J s hand 5.38 ×10 10-5J seinstein/(L • s) for UV and visible illuminance
19
respectively, by supposing their average wavelengths of 254 nm and 560 nm for
20
simplicity. The detailed on light intensity measurement and calculation protocol are
21
given in the SI-2.
22
The phenol removal by various phenomena in the PCBBR were evaluated using the G
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 31
Page 9 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
following protocols: (1) the contribution from phenol adsorption (AD) was evaluated
2
using catalyst-coated carriers without the biofilm and light; (2) the contribution from
3
biodegradation (B) was evaluated using biofilm and catalyst-coated carriers in the
4
dark; (3) the contribution of photocatalysis was evaluated using catalyst-coated carrier
5
without the biofilm illuminated with visible light (VPC) and with UV light (UPC) to
6
evaluate photocatalysis; (4) the coupled effect was evaluated using catalyst-coated
7
carriers coupled with biofilm illuminated with visible light to evaluate the VPCB or
8
catalyst-coated carriers coupled with a biofilm illuminated with UV light to evaluate
9
the UPCB. All of above protocols were conducted in the separate reactor with the
10
same configuration (see Figure 1).
11
In this work, VPCB was novelty realized by intimate coating of the upconversion
12
photocatalysts (Er3+:YAlO3/TiO2) and biofilms on the sponge carriers. The
13
crystallized Er3+:YAlO3 could upconverse visible light with wavelengths of 553 nm
14
(close to the average visible light emission wavelength of this work, 560 nm) to UV
15
light with wavelengths 320 and 360 nm according to our previous fluorescence
16
spectra analysis 14. That is, Er3+:YAlO3 firstly absorbed the incident pump visible light
17
(from LED) and then continuously emitted UV in situ by the excited state absorption
18
(ESA) and/or energy transfer upconversion (ETU) mechanism under one- or
19
multiple-pulsed excitation
20
nanoparticles and resulted in the electron-hole pair generation to conduct the phenol
21
photodegradation. The produced less inhabited intermediates was mineralized finally
22
by biodegradation immediately.
18
. Then, the UV effectively excited the anatase TiO2
H
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 10 of 31
1
Analytical methods. Analytical methods on phenol, DOC, intermediates (analyzed
2
by High Performance Liquid Chromatography, HPLC), and molecular weight (MW)
3
distribution (analyzed by Gel Filtration Chromatography, GFC) are given in the
4
Supporting Information SI-3. Pretreated procedure for carrier microstructure
5
observation by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the biofilm staining
6
procedure for confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) imaging are presented in
7
the Supporting Information (SI-4) and (SI-5), respectively. Microbial community
8
analysis procedure is provided in the Supporting Information (SI-6).
9
RESULTS
10
Phenol degradation and intermediates. The phenol and DOC degradation
11
protocols for AD, B, VPC, UPC, VPCB and UPCB are shown in Figure 2a and b.
12
Phenol, as a kind of typical biological inhibitory pollutants, experienced a slow
13
degradation term as long as 10 hours in the B, in which biofilms was not previously
14
acclimated. Interestingly, such problem could be successfully solved when
15
photocatalysis took part in (ICPB). Both of the VPCB and UPCB almost did not
16
experience
17
microbe-utilizable intermediates by photocatalysis (confirmed by HPLC analysis,
18
Figure 2c). The photocatalytic reaction relies only on the continuous generation of
19
electron-hole pairs, which leads to radical chain reactions that oxidize phenol
20
Thus, adaptive phase (lag phase in the B) is not necessary for the UPC and VPC
21
protocols, and then also for the ICPB protocols which consisted UPC/VPC and
22
coupled with biodegradation. Previous work fully confirmed that B alone was not
lag
phase,
in
which
phenol
was
immediately
I
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
degraded
to
19,20
.
Page 11 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
competent with ICPB when it was used to remove more stable and bio-recalcitrant
2
pollutants such as trichlorophenol, whereas B presented significantly lowered removal
c
3
d
efficiencies than those of ICPB 21.
4 5
Figure 2 Phenol concentrations (a), DOC concentrations (b), HPLC analysis of phenol
6
intermediates (c) versus time with protocols of AD, B, VPC, UPC, UPCB and VPCB, and GFC
7
chromatograms of effluent samples (at the 16th h, d). AD is the adsorption of the carriers alone, B
8
is biodegradation (dark) alone, VPC is visible photocatalysis (no biofilm cultivation) alone, UPC J
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
1
is ultraviolet photocatalysis (no biofilm cultivation) alone, UPCB is ultraviolet photocatalysis and
2
biodegradation, VPCB is visible photocatalysis and biodegradation. Average values of triplicate
3
samples were used here in Figure 2a, b and c. Legends of Figure 2c represent compounds and their
4
retention time in HPLC.
5
The advantages of ICPB also reflected on the efficiency enhancement when
6
visible light was used in this present work, i.e., phenol concentrations in the VPCB
7
were generally 10 mg/L lower than those in the B before 12 h. To be specified, when
8
VPCB was used, 25.5% phenol was rapidly removed in only 2 h due to adsorption,
9
and then the concentration quickly decreased during the following time. The phenol
10
removal efficiency was 98.8% in 12 h, and only 0.6 mg/L of phenol remained after 12
11
h of operation. At the end (16 h), the phenol removal efficiency reached 99.8%.
12
Similarly, the final (16 h) phenol removal efficiency in the B was also as high as
13
99.4%, though it experienced a longer term (16 h). When the UPCB protocol was
14
used, however, phenol removal efficiency was only 67.7% in 12 h, and the phenol
15
concentration did not decrease further, with a residual phenol concentration of 15.7
16
mg/L at the end. It indicates that photocatalysis under UV light did not enhance
17
phenol removal capability when it was coupled with biodegradation. Similarly
18
situation was also found for DOC degradation. The DOC concentrations with the
19
UPCB protocol decreased dramatically from the initial concentration (38.3 mg/L) and
20
reached 21.9 mg/L in the first 5 h, but it then rebounded after between 5 h and 8 h of
21
operation, and then remained at around 30.0 mg/L. In contrast, the DOC concentration
22
decreased dramatically from 38.3 to 13.8 mg/L in 8 h with the VPCB protocol.
23
Generally, DOC removal efficiencies of B, UPCB and VPCB were 56.9%, 21.7% and K
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 31
Page 13 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
64.0%, respectively after 16 h of operation, in which UPCB presented the worst.
2
Actually, the UPC protocol generally led to more effective degradation of both of
3
phenol and DOC than the VPC protocol (see Figure 2a and b). As shown in Figure 2c,
4
enhanced photocatalytic activity excited by UV (UPC) resulted in more extra
5
intermediate species, such as catechol, hydroquinone and two unidentified ones, than
6
those in the VPC at each sampling time. However, the UV light unfortunately played
7
a negative role in the ICPB, whereas relative higher phenol and DOC levels remained
8
in the UPCB.
9
To identify mechanisms which induced different performances of VPCB and
10
UPCB, intermediates were termly analyzed by HPLC (see Figure 2c). Totally 6
11
intermediates were detected during phenol degradation. As compared with the
12
intermediates of VPC and UPC protocols, pathway of phenol degradation of ICPB
13
could be deduced. Photocatalytic oxidation produced reactive oxygen species (such as
14
•OH) to attack phenyl ring, yielding catechol and hydroquinone
15
rings in these compounds broke up, providing less or none inhibitory food to microbes.
16
This step was mainly conducted by photocatalysis in the ICPB, as they were detected
17
as early as 3 h of photocatalysis and ICPB, while biodegradation in the B was
18
inhibited by then. After that, short chain organic acid (such as maleic and oxalic) was
19
produced during either photocatalysis or biodegradation, and finally was converted to
20
CO2. It seemed that the terminal conversion of CO2 in the VPCB was much better
21
than photocatalsis solely, confirmed either by DOC degradation or HPLC analysis.
22
However, catechol and hydroquinone accumulated in the UPCB at 16 h, then L
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
22
, then the phenyl
Environmental Science & Technology
1
biodegradation in the UPCB was speculated to be notably weaker. GFC
2
chromatograms, which presented molecular weight (MW) distribution of the effluent
3
samples of the protocols (see Figure 2d), could further support this speculation.
4
Apparently, much higher level of high MW compounds (300-1400 kDa) were
5
detected in the bulk water of the UPCB, and they were definitely in the range of the
6
reported cellular macromolecules MW (290-5000 kDa)
7
was normally originated from cell lysis, and exhibited refractory characteristics 24. It
8
seemed cell lysis also occurred in the VPCB and B due to food exhaustion at the end
9
of operation, but the amounts of these SMP were much less. In summary, UV and UV
10
photocatalysis could probably result in cell hurt, then caused UPCB presented higher
11
phenol and DOC residual as compared with VPCB.
12
23
. Such high MW fractions
The released SMP could contribute to the increment of DOC. As indicated by 10
13
Wen et al.
, less adsorbable intermediates release could be another reason of DOC
14
increment of UPCB. In this work, maleic acid should be the product less adsorbable to
15
the sponge carrier, as it could be well degraded via photocatalysis alone; however, it
16
turned out to accumulate either in the VPCB or the UPCB whereas the attached
17
biofilms occupied most of the sponge carriers’ adsorption positions. Thus, release of
18
SMP and less adsorbable intermediates both caused DOC increment.
19
M
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 31
Page 15 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
Initial (surface)
Initial (core)
B (surface)
B (core)
UPCB (surface)
UPCB (core)
VPCB (surface)
VPCB (core)
1 2
Figure3. SEM images of the catalyst-coated biofilm carriers. Biofilm on the surface of the carriers (left);
3
biofilm in the core, 1 mm from the surface of the carriers (right) Bar= 5 µm
N
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Scanning electron microscopy observations. Samples of the TiO2-coated carriers
2
with biofilms attached were collected from the B, UPCB, and VPCB reactor
3
operations before and after the phenol degradation tests, and SEM images of these
4
samples are shown in Figure 3. The SEM images of the initial carriers after the
5
biofilms had been cultivated showed that large numbers of microbes were
6
successfully attached. The numbers of microbes on the carriers decreased to different
7
degrees when they were exposed in the B, VPCB, and UPCB reactor operations.
8
The UPCB carriers had the lowest biofilm coverage than those used in other reactor
9
operations during the phenol degradation tests. There were almost no cells on the
10
surface of the UPCB carrier, and only some catalysts uniformly coated on the carrier
11
surface were observed, after the degradation test had been performed. Similarly, only
12
a few microbes were found in the cores of the UPCB carriers, and there were large
13
areas with no biofilm coverage. Such numerous detached biomass from both of
14
exterior and interior of the carriers was observed when they were fluidized in the
15
UPCB. This phenomenon is different from the results of previous publications. The
16
Rittmann group
17
interior of the carriers but not on the outer surface at all during and at the end of
18
UPCB. According to the comparison results of carrier characteristics and UV light
19
intensity of this work and Rittmann group’s (Table S1), the influence of carrier pore
20
size and UV illumination intensity could be excluded, as the carrier of this work was
21
generally with smaller pore size (2.0±0.3 mm), and illuminated under UV light with
22
weaker intensity. In contrast, 3.5 mm sponge carrier and up to 8 mm ceramic carrier
1,3,9-11
reported that microorganisms were clearly protected in the
O
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 31
Page 17 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
were mostly employed in Rittmann group’s. In this work, smaller size sponge carrier
2
led to an enhanced surface-area-to-volume ratio to promote photocatalytic reaction.
3
Unfortunately, the enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROSs) production by UV
4
photocatalysis in this work, probably resulted in biofilms detachment. Furthermore,
5
small carrier size gave more opportunity for the ROSs to penetrate into sponge
6
interior.
7
In contrast, the cores of the VPCB carriers after the degradation test appeared to be
8
still densely covered with microbes, but only the biofilms on the surfaces of the
9
carriers were detached, which resulted in the exposure of coating catalyst to the light.
10
It was found that the detachment was mainly occurred on the carrier surface according
11
to the SEM images (VPCB core and surface in Figure 3), which possessed a very
12
small proportion of the total biomass, and no obvious turbidity of wastewater was
13
observed in the VPCB. The integration of biodegradation and photocatalysis in the
14
VPCB protocol favored the efficient intimate coupling reaction, because the
15
photocatalysis did not over-interfere with biofilm growth. This synergy made the
16
VPCB reactor operation more effective than the other operations.
P
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Skeleton with
1 2
Figure 4. The CLSM images of the catalyst-coated biofilm carriers for polysaccharide (PS) and protein
3
(PN). Optical microscopy photograph (left); β-D glucopyranose polysaccharide (calcoflour white,
4
middle); protein (FITC, right). Slice thickness was 5 µm obtained by cryosectioning, the layer slices 10
5
µm from surface were the selected for imaging, white point shows the center area of the carrier.
6
Bar=200 µm
7 Q
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 31
Page 19 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
CLSM observations. The spatial distributions of the extracellular polymeric
2
substances (EPSs which taken to be PS and PN for this study) in the B, UPCB, and
3
VPCB carriers after the phenol degradation tests were compared by multi-staining
4
combined with CLSM imaging (see Figure 4). Compared with the biofilms before the
5
phenol degradation tests, the amounts of both polysaccharides (PSs) and proteins
6
(PNs) appeared to have increased to some degree (determined from the fluorescence
7
intensity) in all of the biofilms after the phenol degradation tests had been performed.
8
This proved that the microorganisms responded by attempting to resist external
9
damage by hydroxyl free radicals or phenol that was present in the bulk water during
10
the tests 3. However, the PS and PN distributions in the carriers used in the three
11
protocols were still different. Less PS and PN was found in the core than in the outer
12
area of the carriers of B protocol, by comparing the fluorescence intensity in the core
13
(white point in the image) and the outer layer of the carrier. Less PS and PN were also
14
found in the exterior than in the interior of the VPCB carriers (according to the
15
fluorescence intensity). But, a large proportion of the EPSs were detached from the
16
UPCB carriers, and some of the carrier structures appeared to be completely exposed
17
without EPSs attachment in either exterior or interior.
R
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
1 2
Figure 5. DGGE patterns analysis by Quantity One software
3 4
PCR-DGGE analysis. The microbial communities in the protocols changed
5
significantly during the phenol degradation tests, as is shown in Figure 5 and S2. The
6
DGGE image and the optical degree analysis of that image shows bands 1, 3, 4, and 6
7
remained relatively dominant and stable in the VPCB and B protocol systems during
8
the phenol degradation tests, and these bands should represent the microbial groups
9
that were responsible for the biodegradation of phenol. However, the population of
10
some microbial genera became dramatically less in the UPCB protocol system during
11
the phenol degradation test. For example, the intensities of bands 4 and 6 decreased
12
significantly and band 3 disappeared. This disappearance for the UPCB protocol was
13
probably caused by the large amount of damage to the microorganisms by UV light,
14
which is consisted with SEM images. S
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 31
Page 21 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
DISCUSSION
2
UV limitations in the intimate coupling process. The large amount of energy
3
contained in UV light can be used in UV photocatalysis to convert photon energy into
4
chemical energy because UV has short wavelengths, from 100 to 400 nm 27. This
5
work also confirmed that UV photocatalysis (UPC) performed obviously enhanced
6
capability on phenol degradation as compared with that of photocatalysis induced by
7
visible light (VPC), even though the consumed energy (photon energy, in einstein/(L •
8
s), or electric energy, in W/L) of UPC was significantly lower than that of VPC.
9
Similarly, the use of UV in the UPCB protocol should allow phenol efficiently to be
10
transformed into un-recalcitrant intermediates that microbes could use as sources of
11
energy. However, UV irradiation is disinfectant and it is extremely harmful to
12
microbes because proteins and nucleotides in the microbes absorb photons 25,26. The
13
UV photons are absorbed by proteins in the outer membranes of cells exposed to high
14
doses of UV light. Ultimately this absorption leads to the membranes being disrupted,
15
and the cells die because the protoplasm leaks out of the cells 27 DNA molecules and
16
nucleotides also absorb photons of UV light even at low doses of UV light. This
17
causes disruption in the abilities of the cells to replicate DNA and DNA breakage,
18
which results in cell death
19
light with a wavelength of 254 nm, which is within the broad band, 190-260 nm, at
20
which DNA absorbs UV light 30. The microbes in the biofilm, especially at the surface
21
of the carrier in the UPCB protocol system, therefore suffered fatal levels of damage
22
to the cell membranes or DNA and large amounts became detached because they were
28,29
. The mercury vapor lamp used in this work emitted
T
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 22 of 31
1
exposed to UV for 16 h (Figure 3). The detached biofilm caused the bulk water to
2
become turbid, and it has been found that turbidity decreases the penetration of UV
3
light 26. Moreover, the powerful free radicals that are produced by UV-photocatalysis
4
were transferred into the interior of the carrier. The transport of these radicals and
5
killed the microorganisms that were located there and the biomass became detached.
6
Soluble microbial products (SMPs) release using the UPCB protocol. UPCB
7
protocols have previously been successfully used to treat recalcitrant compounds1,3,9,10.
8
However, they released SMPs that remain in the effluent and the organic carbon was
9
not completely removed 1,10. In our study, we have found 30.0 mg/L of DOC remained
10
in the UPCB protocol system after a 16 h degradation test (Figure 2), whereas the
11
DOC was decreased to 13.8 mg/L in 8 h only in the VPCB system. Such high residual
12
DOC in the UPCB was caused by the effect of UV on microbe lysis, and then the
13
following SMP release occurred.
14
The release of SMPs has been found to be closely associated with the occurrence of
15
EPSs during biological treatment. Duan et al. found that the release of SMPs was
16
positively correlated with the EPSs amount that are produced
17
have found that SMPs originate from soluble EPSs, and are rich in PSs and PNs,
18
where are released during cell lysis 32. Organic matters originated from cell lysis was
19
classified to biomass associated products (BAP). BAP mainly consisted of high MW
20
fractions (290-5000 kDa) 23. Apparently, the MW of organic matters in the effluent of
21
UPCB were in this range (see Figure 2c). However, organic matters with MW >10
22
kDa were refractory and inhibited microbial growth
24,33
31
. Some researchers
. This gives us the clue of
U
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
DOC maintained at a stable high level for the UPCB protocol from 6 to 16h,
2
accompanied by the detachment of biofilms and EPSs (Figs. 3 and 4)
3 4
Figure 6. Biodegradability variation in UPCB and VPCB protocols with error bar
5 6
The SMPs in the UPCB protocol system were released because of environmental
7
stress on the microbes. The release of SMPs would have been aggravated by the
8
detachment of the biofilms caused by the UV light disinfection and hydroxyl radicals
9
attack. The release of SMPs triggered in this way would have altered the quality of the
10
bulk water. SMPs are poorly biodegradable especially when released from cell lysis
11
under stressful condition
12
UPCB protocol system during the phenol degradation test (see Figure 6), i.e.,
13
BOD/DOC decreased from 3.3 after 6 h to 1.8 after 12 h, and finally ended in a value
14
of 1.4 after 16 h. The poorly biodegradable substrates in the UPCB protocol system
15
would have strengthened the inhibition of the microorganisms 34, and was considered
16
to contribute to the decreased quantity of microbes to some degree also. In contrast,
17
BOD/COD in the VPCB was increased obviously at first as compared with its level at
34
. This was consistent with the BOD/DOC ratio in the
V
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
1
6 h and 12 h. As discussed previously, phenyl ring break up and small chain organic
2
acid production contributed to biodegradable ability enhancement. At the end,
3
BOD/COD also decrease due to food exhausted induced BAP release, as confirmed
4
by phenol degradation trend and GFC results.
5
Advantages of using VPCB protocols. To the best of our knowledge, the novel
6
intimate coupling protocol VPCB is described here for the first time. We found that
7
VPCB with Er3+:YAlO3/TiO2 photocatalysts offered obvious advantages over UPCB.
8
Firstly, visible light itself caused almost no harm to the biofilms that were present on
9
the exteriors and in the interiors of the carriers (Figure 3). Secondly, the
10
photocatalysis induced by visible light allowed the biofilm to perform active
11
metabolism, and the excessive biomass detachment in the UPCB was avoided when
12
using the VPCB protocol (Figure 4). A lower concentration of free radicals was
13
generated by visible light than that by UV light, because phenol was found to be
14
degraded more quickly using the UV-induced photocatalysis protocol than using the
15
visible-light induced photocatalysis protocol (see Figure 2). The hydroxyl free
16
radicals and phenol intermediates that were produced led to a mild degree of biofilm
17
detachment on the carrier surfaces using the VPCB protocol. And this increased the
18
area of the VPCB catalyst that was exposed to visible light, enhancing the
19
photocatalysis efficiency. Meanwhile, the dominant microbial genera that were
20
responsible for biodegrading phenol in the carrier interior were preserved using the
21
VPCB protocol (Figure 5), so the DOC was mostly removed from the effluent.
22
Thereafter the efficiency at which the VPCB degraded phenol was improved, and the W
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 31
Page 25 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
VPCB protocol remained more efficient than the UPCB protocol at degrading phenol
2
(Figure 2). Probably, a UPCB with lower light intensity could reduce the hurt of UV
3
on microbe, and still competent in transform recalcitrant pollutants to biodegradable
4
intermediates. However, the reasonable UV intensity for treatment of wastewaters
5
with different turbidity or reactor with different depth are still hard to be specified. In
6
summary, the VPCB protocol led to the more efficient removal and mineralization of
7
phenol than the UPCB protocol in this work, because of synergy between the
8
photocatalysis induced by visible light and the biodegradation.
9 10
11
Supporting Information
12
Light intensities selection basis, light intensity calculation protocol, SEM and CLSM
13
imaging pretreat procedures, comparison of carrier characteristics and UV light
14
intensity between this work and other publications, microscope and SEM image of the
15
sponge carrier, and PCR-DGGE analysis is available in the Supporting Information
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
16 17
18
Corresponding Author
19
*(S. Dong) Phone: +86 13604331853; fax: +86 43188502606
20
E-mail:
[email protected] 21
*(M. Huo) Phone: +86 13904304481; fax: +86 43185099550
22
E-mail:
[email protected] AUTHOR INFORMATION
X
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 26 of 31
1 2
Notes
3
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
4 5
6
The authors thank the Natural Sciences Foundation of China (51238001), State Key
7
Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of
8
Technology (QA201418) and Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin
9
province, China (20140101159JC) for financial support for the project.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
10 11 12
REFERENCES (1)
Zhang,
Y.
M.;
Wang,
L.;
Rittmann,
B.
E.,
Integrated
13
photocatalytic-biological reactor for accelerated phenol mineralization. Appl.
14
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86, (6), 1977-1985.
15 16 17
(2)
Moussavi, G.; Mahmoudi, M.; Barikbin, B., Biological removal of phenol
from strong wastewaters using a novel MSBR. Water Res. 2009, 43, (5), 1295-1302. (3)
Li, G. Z.; Park, S.; Kang, D.-W.; Krajmalnik-Brown, R.; Rittmann, B. E.,
18
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol Degradation Using a Novel TiO2-Coated Biofilm Carrier:
19
Roles of Adsorption, Photocatalysis, and Biodegradation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011,
20
45, (19), 8359-8367.
Y
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
(4)
González, L. F.; Sarria, V.; Sánchez, O. F., Degradation of chlorophenols by
2
sequential biological-advanced oxidative process using Trametes pubescens and
3
TiO2/UV. Bioresource Technol. 2010, 101, (10), 3493-3499.
4
(5)
Agarry, S. E.; Audu, T. O. K.; Solomon, B. O., Substrate inhibition kinetics
5
of phenol degradation by Pseudomonas fluorescence from steady state and wash-out
6
data. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 6, (3), 443-450.
7
(6)
Suryaman, D.; Hasegawa, K.; Kagaya, S., Combined biological and
8
photocatalytic treatment for the mineralization of phenol in water. Chemosphere 2006,
9
65, (11), 2502-2506.
10
(7)
L’Amour, R. J. A.; Azevedo, E. B.; Leite, S. G. F.; Dezotti, M., Removal of
11
phenol in high salinity media by a hybrid process (activated sludge +photocatalysis).
12
Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 60, (2), 142-146.
13
(8)
Edalatmanesh, M.; Mehrvar, M.; Dhib, R., Optimization of phenol
14
degradation in a combined photochemical–biological wastewater treatment system.
15
Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2008, 86, (11), 1243-1252.
16
(9)
Marsolek, M. D.; Torres, C. I.; Hausner, M.; Rittmann, B. E., Intimate
17
coupling of photocatalysis and biodegradation in a photocatalytic circulating-bed
18
biofilm reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 101, (1), 83-92.
19
(10) Wen, D. H.; Li, G. Z.; Xing, R.; Park, S. J.; Rittmann, B. E., 2, 4-DNT
20
removal in intimately coupled photobiocatalysis: the roles of adsorption, photolysis,
21
photocatalysis, and biotransformation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 95, (1),
22
263-272. Z
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
1
(11) Li, G. Z.; Park, S. J.; Rittmann, B. E., Degradation of reactive dyes in a
2
photocatalytic circulating-bed biofilm reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, (4),
3
884-893.
4
(12)
Zhang, L. S.; Wang, W. Z.; Yang, J.; Chen, Z. G.; Zhang, W. Q.; Zhou, L.;
5
Liu, S. W., Sonochemical synthesis of nanocrystallite Bi2O3 as a visible-light-driven
6
photocatalyst. Appl Catal A:Gen. 2006, 308, 105-110.
7
(13) Hou, D. X; Feng, L.; Zhang, J. B.; Dong, S. S.; Zhou, D. D.; Lim, T.T.,
8
Preparation, characterization and performance of a novel visible light responsive
9
spherical activated carbon-supported and Er3+:YFeO3-doped TiO2 photocatalyst. J.
10
Hazard. Mater. 2012, 199–200, (1), 301-308.
11
(14) Dong, S. S.; Zhang, X. Y.; He, F. R.; Dong, S. S.; Zhou, D. D.; Wang, B.,
12
Visible‐light photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange over spherical activated
13
carbon ‐ supported and Er3+: YAlO3 ‐ doped TiO2 in a fluidized bed. J. Chem.
14
Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 90, (5), 880–887.
15
(15) Xu, J.; Li, L.; Guo, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S. F., Removal of benzotriazole
16
from solution by BiOBr photocatalysis under simulated solar irradiation. Chem. Eng.
17
J.2013, 221, (4), 230-237.
18
(16) Oller, I.; Malato, S.; Sánchez-Pérez, J. A.; Maldonado, M. I.; Gassó, R.,
19
Detoxification of wastewater containing five common pesticides by solar AOPs–
20
biological coupled system. Catalysis Today 2007, 129, (1-2), 69-78.
AA
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 31
Page 29 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
(17) Zhou, D. D.; Liu, M. Y.; Wang, J.; Dong, S. S.; Cui, N.; Gao, L. L.,
2
Granulation of activated sludge in a continuous flow airlift reactor by strong drag
3
force. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2013, 18, (2), 289-299.
4
(18) Wang, J.; Li, R. H.; Zhang, Z. H; Sun, W.; Xu, R.; Xie, Y. P.; Xing, Z. Q.;
5
Zhang, X. D., Efficient photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes over titanium
6
dioxide coating upconversion luminescence agent under visible and sunlight
7
irradiation. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2008, 334, (1-2): 227-233.
8 9
(19) Hu, C.; Wang, Y. Z.; Tang, H. X., Destruction of phenol aqueous solution by photocatalysis or direct photolysis. Chemosphere 2000, 41, (8), 1205-1209.
10
(20) Wang, R.-C.; Yu, C.-W., Phenol degradation under visible light irradiation in
11
the continuous system of photocatalysis and sonolysis. Ultrason. Sonochem.2013, 20,
12
(1), 553-564.
13
(21) Zhang, Y. M.; Sun, X.; Chen, L. J.; Rittmann, B. E., Integrated
14
photocatalytic-biological reactor for accelerated 2,4,6-trichlorophenol degradation and
15
mineralization. Biodegradation 2012, 23, (1), 189-198.
16 17
(22) Guo, Z.F.; Ma, R.X.; Li, G.J., Degradation of phenol by nanomaterial TiO2 in wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 119, (1), 55-59.
18
(23) Ni, B.-J.; Zeng, R. J.; Fang, F.; Xie, W.-M.; Sheng, G.-P.; Yu, H.-Q.,
19
Fractionating soluble microbial products in the activated sludge process. Water Res.
20
2010, 44, (7), 2292-2302.
BB
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
1
(24) Jarusutthirak, C.; Amy, G., Understanding soluble microbial products (SMP)
2
as a component of effluent organic matter (EfOM). Water Res. 2007, 41, (12),
3
2787-2793.
4
(25) Lin, C.-H.; Yu, R.-F.; Cheng, W.-P.; Liu, C.-R., Monitoring and control of
5
UV and UV-TiO2 disinfections for municipal wastewater reclamation using artificial
6
neural networks. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209-210, (3), 348-354.
7
(26) Loge, F. J.; Emerick, R. W.; Thompson, D. E.; Nelson, D. C.; Darby, J. L.,
8
Factors Influencing Ultraviolet Disinfection Performance Part I: Light Penetration to
9
Wastewater Particles. Water Environ. Res. 1999, 71, (3), 377-381.
10
(27) Marconnet, C.; Houari, A.; Seyer, D.; Djafer, M.; Coriton, G.; Heim, V.; Di
11
Martino, P., Membrane biofouling control by UV irradiation. Desalination 2011, 276,
12
(1-3), 75-81.
13 14
(28) Vilhunen, S.; Särkkä, H.; Sillanpää, M., Ultraviolet light-emitting diodes in water disinfection. Environ. Sci. Pollu. Res. 2009, 16, (4), 439-442.
15
(29) Soloshenko, I. A.; Bazhenov, V. Y.; Khomich, V. A.; Tsiolko, V. V.;
16
Potapchenko, N. G., Comparative Research of Efficiency of Water Decontamination
17
by UV Radiation of Cold Hollow Cathode Discharge Plasma Versus That of Low-
18
and Medium-Pressure Mercury Lamps. Plasma Science, IEEE Transactions on 2006,
19
34, (4), 1365-1369.
20
(30) Koivunen, J.; Heinonen-Tanski, H., Inactivation of enteric microorganisms
21
with chemical disinfectants, UV irradiation and combined chemical/UV treatments.
22
Water Res. 2005, 39, (8), 1519-1526. CC
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 31
Page 31 of 31
Environmental Science & Technology
1
(31) Duan, L.; Jiang, W.; Song, Y. H.; Xia, S. Q.; Hermanowicz, S. W., The
2
characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances and soluble microbial products in
3
moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technol. 2013, 148,
4
(11), 436-442.
5
(32) Laspidou, C. S.; Rittmann, B. E., A unified theory for extracellular polymeric
6
substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 2002,
7
36, (11), 2711-2720.
8
(33) Zhao, X.; Huang, H.; Hu, H.-Y.; Su, C.; Zhao, J.; Liu, S.-M., Increase of
9
microbial growth potential in municipal secondary effluent by coagulation.
10 11 12
Chemosphere 2014, 109, 14-19. (34) Barker, D. J.; Stuckey, D. C., A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems. Water Res. 1999, 33, (14), 3063-3082.
DD
ACS Paragon Plus Environment