Iron-Anode Enhanced Sand Filter for Arsenic Removal from Tube Well

Dec 20, 2016 - A plastic tap was installed at 1.5 cm to the bottom of each bucket as the outlet. Two silicon tubes were respectively connected to the ...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by GAZI UNIV

Article

An Iron-Anode Enhanced Sand Filter for Arsenic Removal from Tube Well Water Shiwei Xie, Songhu Yuan, Peng Liao, Man Tong, Yiqun Gan, and Yanxin Wang Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04387 • Publication Date (Web): 20 Dec 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 27, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

1

An Iron-Anode Enhanced Sand Filter for Arsenic Removal

2

from Tube Well Water

3 4

Shiwei Xie, † Songhu Yuan,*, † Peng Liao,† Man Tong,† , ‡ Yiqun Gan,† , ‡

5

Yanxin Wang†, ‡

6



7

of Geosciences, 388 Lumo Road, Wuhan, 430074, P. R. China

8



9

430074, PR China

State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University

School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei

10

RECEIVED DATE (to be automatically inserted after your manuscript is

11

accepted if required according to the journal that you are submitting your paper

12

to)

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] (S.H. Yuan), Phone: +86-27-67848629, Fax: +86-27-67883456.

21 1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 35

22

ABSTRACT Sand filters are widely used for well water purification in endemic

23

arsenicosis areas, but arsenic (As) removal is difficult at low intrinsic iron

24

concentrations. This work developed an enhanced sand filter by electrochemically

25

generated Fe(II) from an iron anode. The efficiency of As removal was tested in an

26

arsenic burdened region in the Jianghan Plain, central China. By controlling a current

27

of 0.6 A and a flow rate of about 12 L/h, the filter removed total As in the tube well

28

water from 196-472 µg/L to below 10 µg/L, while the residual As was about 110 µg/L

29

without electricity. Adsorption and subsequent oxidation on the surface of Fe(III)

30

precipitates are the main processes controlling the removals of As and Fe. During a

31

30-day intermittent operation, both effluent As concentration and electrical energy

32

consumption decreased progressively. Although filter clogging was observed, it can

33

be alleviated by replacing the top layer of sand. Our findings suggest that dosing Fe(II)

34

by an iron anode is an effective means to enhance As removal in a sand filter.

35 36

INTRODUCTION

37

Despite As is of long legendary toxicity, it is unrevealed until recent decades that

38

widespread symptoms of disease are related to drinking groundwater with elevated

39

As.1,2 Bengal Delta, one of the most serious area of arsenicosis, has attracted intensive

40

attention worldwide.3,4 In China, a population of about 19.6 million was estimated to

41

be at risk of exposure to unsafe As levels as endemic areas of arsenicosis have been

42

emerging since the 1960s.5 In 2005, six villagers were diagnosed as symptoms of

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

43

chronic arsenic poisoning in the Jianghan Plain in central China, and then further

44

investigations revealed that water from 863 wells in 179 villages contained As

45

exceeding the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline (10 µg/L).6,7 Involved in

46

the severe situations people are making concerted efforts to seek alternative As-free

47

water sources and inevitably, to develop simple and efficient methods for As removal.

48

Owing to the common co-occurrence of elevated Fe(II) with As in groundwater,

49

simple sand filters have been developed and widely employed to remove the “bad

50

taste” and muddiness after aeration in the arsenicosis areas.8 Although apparently

51

“clean” water is produced from the sand filters, the effluent As concentration often

52

exceeds the WHO guideline. Berg et al. surveyed the performances of 43 household

53

sand filters in rural areas of the Red River Delta in Vietnam, and concluded that Fe/As

54

mass ratios of ≥250 were required for removing As to below 10 µg/L.9 High

55

concentrations of phosphate and silicate compete with As for the limited adsorption

56

sites on Fe(III) precipitates, increasing the required ratio of Fe/As.10 Therefore, the

57

application of sand filters is largely restricted in As-burdened regions with low Fe

58

concentrations such as Bangladesh.9,11 In the Jianghan Plain in central China, Fe in

59

most of the well water is also insufficient for As removal due to the low average

60

Fe/As mass ratio (e.g., 60).6 These regions emphasize the need of Fe addition to

61

enhance the performance of sand filters for As removal.

62

Various scenarios have been developed for Fe addition in the sand filtration process.

63

Direct addition of ferric salts is a simple way, but oxidants such as hypochlorite salts

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 35

64

are usually required for As(III) oxidation.12,13 Dosing Fe(II) is a better choice as the

65

reactive intermediates produced by Fe(II)/O2 reactions could partially oxidize As(III)

66

in groundwater.11,14 Moreover, multiple or continuous additions of Fe(II) facilitate

67

As(III) removal and reduce Fe(II) consumption compared to one-time addition.11,15 In

68

practical applications, Fe(II) can be continuously supplied from elemental iron by acid

69

dissolution, corrosion in aerobic water and electrolysis.11 Acid dissolution of iron (e.g.

70

by sulfuric acid) needs pH adjustment and introduces undesirable anions. Household

71

sand filters based on the corrosion of zero-valent iron (ZVI) have been used in

72

Bangladesh.16-18 However, production of Fe(II) is limited by the influent dissolved

73

oxygen (DO) and the precipitates coated on ZVI.16 Fe(II) addition by a sacrificial iron

74

anode is an expedient means, which has been widely used in electrocoagulation for As

75

treatment.15,19-25 Most of the studies dealt with either salt solution or synthetic

76

groundwater with elevated As concentrations, and only limited studies tested real

77

groundwater.20,26,27 In a community scale Electro-Chemical Arsenic Remediation

78

(ECAR) reactor developed by Amrose et al., clean water was separated through

79

gravitational settling aided by 6‒15 mg/L aluminum.27 Compared to the hours needed

80

for separation in the ECAR system,27 the time can be reduced to minutes by the sand

81

filtration.

82

In the rural areas of Jianghan Plain, both household (Figure S1 in the Supporting

83

Information (SI)) and community-scale sand filtration are being used to purify the

84

groundwater, but the water quality still cannot satisfy the local people. In this study,

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

85

we adopted electrochemical addition of Fe(II) from an Fe anode into a household sand

86

filter and tested the system performance for As removal from the local tube well water

87

in the Jianghan Plain. The objectives are to (1) verify the enhancement of an iron

88

anode for As removal from the local groundwater, (2) assess the performance of the

89

new filter in the field, and (3) decipher the mechanisms of As and Fe removal.

90

Knowledge generated from this study could provide a new strategy for enhancing As

91

removal in sand filters.

92 93

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

94

Field Site. The field site (30.176817°N, 113.680651°E) is located in the Nanhong

95

Village in the central part of Jianghan Plain in Hubei Province, central China. This

96

site was chosen because the first arsenicosis case was found there and the highest As

97

concentration (up to 1072 µg/L) was measured in the well water.6 The sediment

98

lithology in the area is generally sandy silts and clays in the top layer of 0-18 m, and

99

fine to coarse sand in the layer of 18-50 m.28 The residential wells mainly extract the

100

confined groundwater at about 10‒45 m depth, where elevated concentrations of As

101

primarily occur.6,28 The high concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC, mean

102

6 mg/L) and easily reduced Fe oxides/hydroxides favor the release of As in the

103

aquifer.6,28 Two wells were drilled into the depths of 26 and 23 m, respectively, on

104

May, 2015. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes (5-cm inner diameter) were then installed

105

with the bottom 2.4 m perforated and screened. The main compositions of the tube

5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 35

106

well water are presented in Table 1. All the experiments were excuted in an residential

107

house near the tube wells from June to September in 2015.

108

Design and Operation of the Sand Filter with Iron Electrodes. Referring to the

109

experience of SONO filters,17 we also adopted two buckets for a two-stage treatment

110

(Figure 1). The food-grade polypropylene (PP) buckets (17 L) were packed with

111

13-kg coarse yellow sand and 1.5-kg brick chips, yielding a total pore volume of

112

2.5-2.9 L in each bucket. The yellow sand was taken from the bank of Hanjiang River.

113

The coarse fraction with the grain size of >0.4 mm was separated and washed by the

114

groundwater from tube well 2 prior to use. Iron from the groundwater could be

115

adsorbed and precipitated on the sand surface during the washing (98% Fe, 0.42-0.50% C, 0.17-0.37% Si and

122

0.50-0.80% Mn, supplied by Wuhan Steel Processing Co., Ltd.) were used as the

123

electrodes in each bucket (Figure S2). They were placed in parallel above the sand

124

with an interval of 1 cm. The electrode, which has a diameter of 27 cm and a weight

125

of 0.8 kg, was evenly distributed with 241 holes (6-mm diameter) for groundwater

126

flow. A constant current was applied on the electrodes by a direct-current (DC) supply

6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

127

(GPC-3060D, Taiwan Goodwill). To alleviate the passivation of Fe anode, the

128

electrode polarity was reversed when the voltage increased drastically.29 Additionally,

129

the electrodes were brushed once a week to remove the sand and precipitates loading

130

on them. Assuming 100% current efficiency for Fe(II) production from the Fe anode,

131

the concentration of Fe(II) (CFe(II), mg/L) produced was a function of the operating

132

current (I, A) and the flow rate (Q, L/h) in the filter (eq 1):

133

CFe ( II ) = 3.6 ×106

I M ( ) Q zF

(1)

134

where z is the number of electrons involved (= 2), F is Faraday’s constant (96500

135

C/mol), and M is the molecular weight of Fe (56 g/mol).

136

The operation details were presented in Section S1. Briefly, groundwater from the

137

two tube wells was fed to the filter by a peristaltic pump, or alternatively, was stored

138

in a tank and munully transferred to the filter using a bailer. A flow rate of 12 L/h was

139

set referring to the operation of SONO filters in Bangladesh.18 The filter was drained

140

periodically for aeration. Fresh sand was used in each test. During the tests, aqueous

141

samples were taken from Ports R1, R2, G1, G2 and the well. The samples for As and

142

Fe analysis were collected in pre-acidified (pH