Iron Robustly Stimulates Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification

Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF DURHAM

Article

Iron Robustly Stimulates Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification Under Aerobic Conditions Hong Chen, Xuhao Zhao, Yuying Cheng, Mingji Jiang, Xiang Li, and Gang Xue Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04751 • Publication Date (Web): 03 Jan 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 4, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

1 2

Iron Robustly Stimulates Simultaneous Nitrification and

3

Denitrification Under Aerobic Conditions

4

Hong Chen1,2, Xuhao Zhao1, Yuying Cheng1, Mingji Jiang1, Xiang Li1,2, Gang Xue*

5

(1School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, 2999 North

6

Renmin Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, 201620, China

7

2

Jiangsu Tongyan Environm Prod Sci & Technol Co Lt, Yancheng, 224000, China)

8 9

10

*Corresponding author

11

E-mail: [email protected]

12

Tel: 86-21-67792537

13

Fax: 86-21-67792522

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


14

Abstract

15

Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) is a promising single-reactor biological

16

nitrogen-removal method. Activated sludge with and without iron scrap supplementation

17

(Sludge-Fe and Sludge-C, respectively) was acclimated under aerobic condition. The total

18

nitrogen (TN) content of Sludge-Fe substantially decreased from 25.0±1.0 to 11.2±0.4 mg/L, but

19

Sludge-C did not show the TN-removal capacity. Further investigations excluded a chemical

20

reduction of NO3--N by iron and a decrease of NH4+-N by microbial assimilation, and the

21

contribution of SND was verified. Moreover, the amount of aerobic denitrifiers, such as bacteria

22

belonging to the genera Thauera, Thermomonas, Rhodobacter and Hyphomicrobium, was

23

considerably enhanced, as observed through Miseq Illumina sequencing method. The activities of

24

the key enzymes ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) and nitrite oxidoreductase (NXR), which are

25

associated with nitrification, and periplasmic nitrate reductase (NAP) and nitrite reductase (NIR),

26

which are related to denitrification, in Sludge-Fe were 1.23-, 1.53-, 3.60- and 1.55-fold higher

27

than those in Sludge-C, respectively. In Sludge-Fe, the quantity of the functional gene NapA

28

encoding enzyme NAP, which is essential for aerobic denitrification, was significantly promoted.

29

The findings indicate that SND is the primary mechanism underlying the removal of TN and that

30

iron scrap can robustly stimulate SND under aerobic environment.

31

Introduction

32

Nitrogen is one of the main causes of waterbody degradation because excess nitrogen loading

33

to waterways leads to increased eutrophication and associated water quality impacts.1, 2 To reduce

34

the amount of nitrogen entering waterbodies, nitrogen removal from wastewater has become a

35

focus of wastewater treatment plants (WWTP), and biological removal methods using activated

2


Page 2 of 28

Page 3 of 28


36

sludge are often applied because of their low cost and high efficiency.

37

In traditional biological treatment processes, nitrogen removal primarily occurs in separate

38

anoxic and aerobic phases and is generally conducted in separate bioreactors or by different

39

aeration intervals. With the observation of dissimilative nitrogen loss during the aerobic stage in

40

the wastewater treatment process, the nitrification and denitrification can occur concurrently in a

41

single reactor under aerobic conditions, which is often referred as simultaneous nitrification and

42

denitrification (SND) process. In recent years, the discovery of aerobic denitrifiers can explain the

43

SND process from microbial perspective, and many bacteria strains owing aerobic denitrification

44

capacity are isolated and characterized. Aerobic denitrifiers have promising potential for nitrogen

45

removal in a single aerobic reactor. It was reported that the coal-based ethylene glycol industry

46

wastewater with high concentrations of nitrate and nitrite could be treated when an aerobic reactor

47

was bioaugmented with a Pseudomonas strain;3 A continuous-upflow submerged biofilter

48

inoculated with Pseudomonas stutzeri X31 worked effectively to remove nitrate under an aerobic

49

atmosphere;4 When bioaugmented with the aerobic denitrifier Microvirgula aerodenitrificans, the

50

nitrate produced during the aerobic nitrifying-phosphate uptake phase was reduced concurrently;5

51

Piggery wastewater treatment using Alcaligenes faecalis strain No. 4 exhibited simultaneous

52

aerobic nitrification and denitrification process.5 The approach of bioaugmentation with special

53

aerobic denitrifiers shows a total nitrogen removal capacity as mentioned above. However, few

54

pilot or full-scale applications have been carried out so far. The likely reason is that the abundance

55

of the seeded strain is getting lower with the operation time, causing the nitrogen removal

56

efficiency unstable.3 Moreover, the methods currently used for aerobic denitrifiers isolating or

57

enriching include intermittent aeration, bromothymol blue (BTB) medium separation and 3



58

cultivation using denitrification medium,6 which are difficult to realize in an actual wastewater

59

treatment plant for functional strains enriching. Consequently, if a simple method increasing the

60

abundance of aerobic denitrifiers in the WWTP itself could be found, the SND would become

61

more practicable and reliable in future engineering application.

62

During SND process, NH4+-N is successively oxidized to NH2OH, NO2--N and NO3--N via

63

catalysis by the enzymes of ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), hydroxylamine oxidoreductase

64

(HAO) and nitrite oxidoreductase (NXR), respectively in nitrification process. In the subsequent

65

aerobic denitrification stage, the produced NO3--N is catalytically reduced to NO2--N by enzyme

66

of periplasmic nitrate reductase (NAP).6 Then, the enzyme nitrite reductase (NIR) catalyzes the

67

one-electron reduction of nitrite into nitric oxide, and the enzymes nitric oxide reductase (NOR)

68

and nitrous oxide reductase (NosZ) reduce nitric oxide and nitrous oxide, respectively. Notably,

69

the membrane nitrate reductase (NAR), which catalyzes the nitrate reduction under anaerobic

70

condition, is seriously suppressed by oxygen, while NAP can be expressed under both aerobic and

71

anaerobic conditions,7, 8 and it is essential for aerobic denitrification.9 Moreover, the detection of

72

NapA gene, which encodes the NAP enzyme, also suggests that aerobic denitrification can occur.10,

73

11

74

process are summarized in Figure 1.12, 13

In this study, the nitrogen species transformations and the corresponding enzymes in SND

4


Page 4 of 28

Page 5 of 28


NO3

-

NosZ

-

NO2

N2 2e-

HAO Hemec

NH3

Heme c

1e

NIR

Fe/S NapA

NapA Fe/S NO2-

-

Cyt c

N2O

NapB

2e-

NO

NH2OH NxrA Fe-S 2H+

NapG 4Fe/S

NxrB Fe-S

UQ Cu/Fe

Tat complex

b UQH2

NapH

UQ 2Fe/S

UQH2

AMO Holo-NapA

Fe/S

4Fe/S NapF

NOR (Fe)

(Fe-S) 2eFAD 2eSuccinate

Apo-NapA NapD

75

2H+

2H+

Cyt c1

UQH2

(Fe-S)

UQ

Cyt b

UQH2

2H+

UQ

NADH Dehydrogenase Periplasm (Fe-S)

2H+

FP

2H+ Cyt bc1 Complex

Cytoplasm NADH/H+

NAD+

Fumarate

Electron transfer

Nitrogen species transformation

Proton transfer

Other substances transformation

76

Figure 1. The nitrogen species transformations and the relevant enzymes participating in

77

nitrification and denitrification.

78

It can be seen from Figure 1 that large amounts of metalloproteins (such as cytochrome and

79

dehydrogenase) and certain functional nitrification and denitrification enzymes (i.e. AMO, NXR,

80

NAP and NOR) contain iron acting as the active center. In addition, other indispensable metal

81

element such as copper is contained in enzymes of AMO, NirK, and NosZ.12 Furthermore, iron

82

can be used as electron acceptor in the electron transport chains and prosthetic groups of

83

oxidoreductases, thereby enhancing the metabolic activity of the microbial community.

84

Researchers have found that the iron plays active role in bacteria for nitrogen utilization or

85

removal. The isolated strains such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and

86

Bacillus licheniformis can use the NH4+-N and NO3--N concurrently in aerobic condition, and the

87

removal efficiency was significantly promoted after Fe2+ was added to the medium.9, 14, 15 When

88

using Paracoccus versutus LYM to simultaneously remove NH4+-N and NO3--N, some NO2--N

89

was left during the SND process, and Fe2+ adding benefited bacterial growth and NO2--N

90

reduction.16 After growing Paracoccus pantotrophus P16 in medium supplemented with 1.5 uM

91

Fe3+, the enzymatic activity of nitrate and nitrite reductase showed a 2.6- and 1.7- fold increase.17

92

In addition, adding Fe3+ of 50 mg/L obtained a considerable increasing in TN and NH4+-N removal 5



93

during the nitrification-denitrification process in a submerged membrane bioreactor.18 In our

94

previous study, it was confirmed that iron scrap could improve the nitrification efficiency in the

95

aerobic stage and the dissolved ferric ions in the nitrification liquid were beneficial for the

96

subsequent anoxic denitrification process during the advanced nitrogen removal treatment from

97

dyeing wastewater.19 Ma found that iron shaving pretreatment could remarkably enhance the

98

organic pollutants and nutrient removal efficiency in the following biological treatment system.5

99

Therefore, the iron supplementation could enhance the inherent nitrogen removal capacity of the

100

bacteria strains. Figure 1 revealed that the NAP system of periplasmic nitrate reduction consists of

101

several proteins rich in Fe/S cluster. Moreover, NAP system can be found almost extensively in

102

the phylum proteobacteria,12 which is commonly detected in WWTP under both aerobic and

103

anaerobic conditions. In general, the aerobic system in WWTP presents nitrification. When iron is

104

added in the aerobic nitrification system, whether the iron supplementation affects the aerobic

105

nitrification performance? Can the enzymes relevant to denitrification especially NAP be

106

stimulated by iron and then initiate the aerobic denitrification, making SND occur in its original

107

aerobic nitrification system? Furthermore, what is the role of iron in this process if SND was

108

started successfully?

109

In this study, the probable effect of iron on SND stimulation was investigated. The easily

110

available and low-cost iron scrap was supplemented to a universal aerobic activated sludge system,

111

and the nitrogen removal performance was detected. After acclimation for several days, it was

112

found amazingly that the system with iron supplementation showed TN removal ability, whereas

113

the control system without iron addition only performed nitrification. Therefore, the TN removal

114

behavior and primary factors underlying its removal efficiency were discussed. Then, the 6


Page 6 of 28

Page 7 of 28


115

mechanisms of TN removal induced by iron were interpreted based on the possibilities of NO3--N

116

chemical reduction with iron, the NH4+-N utilization by microbe assimilation, and the verification

117

of SND process. Finally, the shift in microbial community structure was analyzed via Miseq

118

Illumina sequencing method. The key enzymatic activity correlated with nitrification and

119

denitrification were tested, and the functional genes encoding denitrification enzymes were

120

measured via real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays.

121

Materials and Methods

122

Iron. Iron scrap from lathe cutting waste with lengths of 5~10 cm and a spiral bending shape

123

was used in this study (Figure S1, see Supporting Information (SI)). Before the experiment, the

124

iron scrap was immersed and washed in NaOH (0.2 M) for 24 h to remove the surface oil. After

125

the iron scrap was dissolved by nitric acid, its composition was measured by inductively coupled

126

plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, PerkinElmer Optima 2100 DV, USA), and the

127

results are shown in Table S1 in SI.

128

Set-up and Operation of the Parent Reactor. Reactors (Reactor-C and Reactor-Fe) with inner

129

pore plate and working volumes of 1 L were used (Figure S2 in SI). The seeding activated

130

sludge, obtained from the Songjiang WWTP in Shanghai, was centrifuged and washed three times

131

using 0.9% NaCl solution and then added to the Reactor-C and Reactor-Fe along with a mixed

132

liquid suspended solids (MLSS) concentration of approximately 3000 mg/L. According to the

133

results of our previous study,19 the 60 g/L of iron scrap was put on the inner pore plate of

134

Reactor-Fe to avoid the influence of mixture stirring. Reactor-C without iron adding was set as the

135

control. During the operation period, synthetic wastewater (described in SI) was used. Briefly, the

136

influent COD using acetic acid was 300 mg/L, and the initial NH4+-N or TN concentration was 25

7



137

mg/L. The pH value was adjusted to 7.5 using 2 M NaOH or 2 M HCl. The reactors were

138

maintained in room temperature and constantly mixed using magnetic stirrer with stirring rate of

139

700 r/min except during the settling and decanting period. Air was provided to the reactors by an

140

aerator using an on/off control system and the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration was

141

maintained at around 3 mg/L. During the acclimation period, one reaction cycle was set as 24 h.

142

After 22 h aeration period, the mixture was settled for 1 h, the supernatant of 750 mL was

143

discharged for 5 min and 55 min idle period was followed. Then fresh synthetic wastewater of 750

144

mL was supplemented during the initial 5 min of next cycle, leading a hydraulic retention time

145

(HRT) of 30.6 h. At the end of aerobic stage of one cycle every day, sludge mixture of 100 mL

146

was discharged, and the sludge retention time (SRT) was 10 d. The nitrogen removal of these two

147

reactors was determined every day during the acclimation period. Reactor-C and Reactor-Fe were

148

constructed in triplicate. After the reactors reached a stable nitrogen removal performance, the

149

sludges from Reactor-C and Reactor-Fe were named as Sludge-C and Sludge-Fe, and were used

150

for further investigation.

151

Batch Experiments for Optimal Operation Conditions Determination. Batch experiments

152

using Sludge-Fe were conducted to find the optimal operation condition from the aspects of pH

153

value, DO concentration and C/N ratio. When considering the optimal pH value for TN removal,

154

Mixture of 400 mL withdrawn from parent Reactor-Fe before the end of aerobic stage was

155

centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min, washed with 0.9% NaCl solution for 3 times, and resuspended

156

in 100 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution before being divided into 4 batch reactors. The 25 mL of the

157

resuspended sludge and 25 mL synthetic wastewater (containing 0.5 mL concentrated solution,

158

0.027 mL trace-element solution and 0.027 mL acetic acid, see SI) were fed into each reactor. 8


Page 8 of 28

Page 9 of 28


159

Distilled water was then added to make the final volume of the mixture in each reactor to be 100

160

mL, resulting in the influent COD and NH4+-N concentrations were 300 and 25 mg/L, respectively.

161

Before experiment, the initial pH values were adjusted to 6, 7, 8 and 9 by using 4 M NaOH or HCl.

162

During the experiment, the DO concentration was maintained at 3 mg/L as parent reactors, and the

163

mixture was constantly stirred. The TN concentration was detected every hour, and the optimal pH

164

was determined based on the TN removal efficiency. Similarly, the DO concentrations were

165

controlled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mg/L in different reactors when taking account of the optimal DO

166

value, meanwhile the pH value was set as the optimal one, and the COD and NH4+-N were set as

167

300 and 25 mg/L, respectively. Based on the optimal pH value and DO concentration, setting the

168

NH4+-N concentration as 25 mg/L, changing the initial acetic acid dosages to make the C/N ratios

169

as 0, 4, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18, the optimal C/N ratio was determined.

170

Other Analytical Methods. The measurements of enzymatic activities of AMO, NXR, NAP and

171

NIR are described in SI. The analysis of the microbial community was conducted by Illumina

172

MiSeq sequencing technique for it can generate a large number of sequences. The samples for

173

sequencing were withdrawn from triplicate reactors and mixed completely to homogenize the

174

samples for DNA extraction and microbial analysis (in SI). The real-time qPCR assay of the

175

denitrification-related genes and the specific oxygen uptake rate measurements for Sludge-C and

176

Sludge-Fe were performed according to the literature with modifications (see SI).20 The COD,

177

NH4+-N, NO3--N, NO2--N, TN, MLSS and mixed liquid volatile suspended solid (MLVSS)

178

analyses were conducted according to standard methods.21 The amounts of Fe3+ and Fe2+ were

179

determined by the phenanthroline spectrophotography method using a UV-vis spectrophotometer

180

(PerkinElmer, Lambda 35). 9



All tests were performed in triplicate, and the results are expressed as the

181

Statistical Analysis.

182

mean ± standard deviation. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test the

183

significance of the results, and p0.05), implying that the contribution of assimilation to TN removal

322

in the Sludge-Fe system could be ignored. Because the assimilation and SOURs had no obvious

323

difference, the cell growth rate and the biomass concentration of Sludge-Fe and Sludge-C should

324

be similar when using NH4+-N as nitrogen source. However, after finishing the domestication

325

process, the MLSS and MLVSS of Sludge-Fe were 4320±122 and 2600±85 mg/L, which were

326

litter higher than those in Sludge-C, with MLSS and MLVSS of 3560±120 and 2350±60 mg/L. 17



Page 18 of 28

327

Here, the TN removal occurred in a single reactor (Reactor-Fe) during the aerobic stage, which

328

meant that nitrification and denitrification might occur simultaneously, and NO3--N could be used

329

for assimilation as well by Sludge-Fe during denitrification process, causing the biomass

330

concentration of Sludge-Fe to be higher. Therefore, SND might have been initiated in the

331

Sludge-Fe system, and it was further demonstrated as following.

332

Contribution of SND to TN Removal. To verify the NO2--N or NO3--N can be denitrified by

333

Sludge-Fe, NO2--N or NO3--N at concentration of 25 mg/L was used to replace the NH4+-N in the

334

influent, and their concentrations with the reaction time were detected. 30 -

Using NO2 -N as influent

Concentration (mg/L)

25

-

-

NO2 -N

NO3 -N

-

Using NO3 -N as influent

20

-

NO3 -N

15 10 5 0 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Time (h)

335 336

Figure 6. Concentration variation of NO2--N and NO3--N with reaction time. Error bars represent

337

the standard deviations of triplicate tests.

338

As shown in Figure 6, when using NO3--N as the influent, the concentration decreased with

339

the time, demonstrating that the NO3--N could be directly denitrified. As to NO2--N, 25 mg/L of

340

NO2--N was totally removed and approximate 13 mg/L NO3--N was produced. It could be

341

speculated that the NO2--N could be directly reduced, and then the remaining NO2--N was

342

oxidized to NO3--N; additionally, the NO2--N could also be initially oxidized to NO3--N and then

343

the produced NO3--N was denitrified. Both two possible pathways could totally remove the 18


Page 19 of 28


344

NO2--N and cause the final NO3--N concentration to decrease. Since the NO2--N could be easily

345

oxidized to NO3--N in both pathways, it was more likely that the aerobic denitrification began with

346

NO3--N reduction, and the enzyme discussion below would further demonstrate it. Moreover, the

347

experiment using NO3--N and NO2--N as influent was conducted using Sludge-C, and the results

348

indicated that almost all the influent NO2--N was transformed to NO3--N, and the influent NO3--N

349

concentration remained constant during the entire reaction period. In conclusion, nitrification

350

occurred in both Sludge-C and Sludge-Fe while denitrification process only appeared in Sludge-Fe,

351

which confirmed that SND might be the main reason for the TN removal found in Sludge-Fe.

352

Shift in the Microbial Community. Microorganisms play key roles on the nitrogen species

353

transformation in biological nitrogen removal process. To further explore the effect of iron scrap

354

on microbial structure and verify the contribution of SND to TN removal, a comprehensive

355

investigation of the microbial community and the structural differences between Sludge-C and

356

Sludge-Fe was conducted using Illumina MiSeq sequencing technique. The results showed that

357

the microbial diversity and richness of the Sludge-Fe system were slightly higher than those of the

358

Sludge-C system (Table S4, SI). Twenty-two phyla were detected in both reactors, and there were

359

8 primary ones including Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Acidobacteria,

360

Nitrospirae, Chlorobi, Armatimonadetes and Firmicutes, which accounted for 98.5% (Sludge-C)

361

and 98.6% (Sludge-Fe) of the total reads (shown in Figure S6, SI). It was reported that aerobic

362

denitrifiers mainly belonged to Proteobacteria,6 and it was the predominant phylum found in both

363

Sludge-C and Sludge-Fe. Although there was no significant difference on phyla level, the structure

364

and composition of microbial species were changed remarkably between Sludge-C and Sludge-Fe.

365

Venn analysis showed that only 1562 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), or 34.3% of the total 19



Page 20 of 28

366

OTUs (4560, 3% distance), were shared by Sludge-C and Sludge-Fe (Figure S7, SI). Moreover, to

367

explain the variation in the nitrogen removal capacity, which was likely attributed to microbes and

368

the functional evolution of the microbial community, the abundance of microbes relating with

369

denitrification was explored at genus level as shown in Table 1.

370

Table 1. Abundance of bacteria in Sludge-C and Sludge-Fe related with nitrification and

371

denitrification at genus level Function

Genus

Affiliated phylum

Nitrification

Nitrospira

Denitrification

Abundance (%) Sludge-C

Sludge-Fe

Nitrospirae

0.955

1.774

Dechloromonas

Proteobacteria

2.283

4.576

Thauera

Proteobacteria

1.422

1.945

Thermomonas

Proteobacteria

0.018

1.524

Rhodobacter

Proteobacteria

0.003

0.091

Hydrogenophaga

Proteobacteria

0.039

0.087

Hyphomicrobium

Proteobacteria

0.009

0.015

Thiothrix

Proteobacteria

0.003

0.011

Fusibacter

Firmicutes

0.000

0.121

Flavobacterium

Bacteroidetes

0.009

0.030

372

Although both Sludge-C and Sludge-Fe presented high nitrification efficiency, the genus

373

Nitrospira relating to nitrification was enhanced in Sludge-Fe (1.774% versus 0.995% in

374

Sludge-C). The microbes associated with denitrification, including Dechloromonas,27,

375

Thauera,29 Thermomonas,30 Rhodobacter,31 Hydrogenophaga,32 Hyphomicrobium,33 Thiothrix,34

376

Fusibacter35 and Flavobacterium,36 were all remarkably increased, and their total amount

377

occupied 3.786% of the total bacterial in Sludge-C, while the total proportion increased to 8.4% in

378

Sludge-Fe. Among these denitrification bacteria, Thauera, Thermomonas, Rhodobacter and

379

Hyphomicrobium have been reported to act as aerobic denitrifiers,29-31, 33 and their total abundance

380

increased prominently in the presence of iron scrap (3.575% in Sludge-Fe versus 1.452% in the

381

Sludge-C), especially the abundance of genus Thermomonas remarkably increasing from 0.018% 20


28

Page 21 of 28


382

to 1.524%, and genus Rhodobacter improving from 0.003% to 0.091%. Obviously, the microbial

383

community in the Sludge-Fe system was shifted to a direction favoring for denitrification, which

384

was in accord with the TN removal observed in Reactor-Fe.

385

Key Enzymatic Activity and Functional Genes. The iron scrap has been verified to

386

influence the bacteria community structure which was associated with the SND appearance. The

387

biological nitrogen removal is directly related to the bacterial activity, which is commonly

388

reflected and determined by the corresponding enzymes. The observation of aerobic denitrification

389

in Sludge-Fe system implied that denitrification-related enzymes might have been activated and

390

subsequently taken part in denitrification process. The nitrate reduction can be catalyzed by

391

enzyme of NAP or NAR; NAP can be expressed under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions

392

while NAR is inhibited by oxygen.7, 8 Therefore, NAP is essential for nitrate reduction in aerobic

393

denitrification process. Besides NAP, the other enzymes participating in aerobic denitrification are

394

almost the same as those of the anaerobic process, including NIR, NOR and NosZ. In this study,

395

the activities of AMO and NXR, which are the main enzymes responsible for nitrification,37 and

396

NAP and NOR, which are crucial for denitrification, were measured.38

397

As shown in Figure 7(a), when the enzyme activity of Sludge-C was set to 100%, the AMO

398

and NXR activities in Sludge-Fe increased to 123±6% and 153±5%, respectively, suggesting that

399

iron was beneficial for nitrification. However, their nitrification efficiencies had no remarkable

400

difference perhaps because Sludge-C already had the excellent nitrification capacity. With respect

401

to the denitrification enzymes, the iron scrap supplementation increased the NAP activity of

402

Sludge-Fe by 3.60±0.15-fold compared with that of Sludge-C. Meanwhile, the activity of NIR was

403

155±7% higher in Sludge-Fe than that in Sludge-C. The promotion of activities of key enzymes 21



Page 22 of 28

404

especially the denitrification enzymes directly related with the aerobic denitrification, which

405

showed good agreement with the TN removal in Sludge-Fe. Sludge-C

a

Sludge-Fe

700

Key Genes Relative Quantity (%)

Relative Enzyme Activity (%)

400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

AMO

406

Nitrification

NXR

NAP

NIR

b

Sludge-C Sludge-Fe

600 500 400 300 200 100 0

NapA

NirK

NirS

Denitrification

407

Figure 7. Comparing the enzyme activity (a) and relative quantity of functional genes (b) in

408

Sludge-Fe and Sludge-C. Error bars represent the standard deviations of triplicate tests.

409

It is well-known that the enzymes secreted by denitrifiers are encoded and controlled by the

410

corresponding functional genes. Since the notable difference of these two sludges was that

411

Sludge-Fe had aerobic denitrification ability while Sludge-C had not, the functional genes

412

encoding the denitrification key enzymes were further quantified by real-time qPCR. The

413

detection of the NapA gene, which encodes enzyme NAP responsible for NO3--N reduction, has

414

often been applied as the proof of aerobic denitrification in mixed liquor samples.10 The genes

415

NirK and NirS encode the enzyme responsible for reducing NO2--N to NO. It was indicated from

416

Figure 7(b) that the relative quantities of the NapA, NirK and NirS genes in Sludge-Fe were 2.24-,

417

6.87- and 5.45- fold higher than those of Sludge-C, respectively. The up-regulated genes suggested

418

that more aerobic denitrification genes regulated the synthesis and expression of corresponding

419

NAP and NIR enzymes when iron scrap was added, which led to the TN removal in Sludge-Fe.

420

In this study, that the SND process could be initiated by iron scrap adding in the aerobic

421

nitrification activated sludge system was demonstrated. After the iron scrap supplementation, the 22


Page 23 of 28


422

abundance of aerobic denitrifiers was enhanced. The activities of key enzymes relating to

423

biological nitrogen removal were increased, and the functional genes encoding denitrification

424

enzymes were up-regulated. Although the method shows a promising future in nitrogen removal,

425

more investigations are required before putting it into the engineering, such as increasing the

426

influent nitrogen concentration, improving the TN removal efficiency, and reducing the carbon

427

source demanding. Furthermore, the mechanism of SND robustly initiated by iron scrap rather

428

than Fe2+ or Fe3+ should be deeply interpreted in future study.

429

430

AUTHOR INFORMATION

431

Corresponding Author

432

*Phone: 86-21-67792537; fax: 86-21-67792522; e-mail: [email protected].

433

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

434

This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant

435

no. 51508081), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160431) and the

436

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2232015D3-23).

437

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

438

Supporting Information Available.

439

methods including the composition of synthetic wastewater, the MiSeq Sequencing method, the

440

detection of specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR), and the determination of activities of enzymes

441

AMO, NXR, NAP and NIR. This information is available free of charge via the Internet at

442

http://pubs.acs.org/.

443

REFERENCES

This file contains 7 figures, 6 tables, and experiment

23



444

(1) Novotny, V.; Wang, X.; Englande, A. J.; Bedoya, D.; Promakasikorn, L.; Tirado, R.,

445

Comparative assessment of pollution by the use of industrial agricultural fertilizers in four

446

rapidly developing Asian countries. Environ Dev Sustain 2010, 12 (4), 491-509.

447

(2) Lopez, C. B., Jewett, E. B., Dortch, Q., Walton, B. T., Hudnell, H. K. Scientific assessment of

448

marine harmful algal blooms. Interagency working group on harmful algal blooms, hypoxia,

449

and human health of the joint subcommittee on ocean science and technology.Resource

450

document. Available at http://ocean.ceq.gov/about/sup_jsost_iwgs.html, accessed 05 of

451

February 2011.

452

(3) Du, C.; Cui, C. W.; Qiu, S.; Shi, S. N.; Li, A.; Ma, F., Nitrogen removal and microbial

453

community shift in an aerobic denitrification reactor bioaugmented with a Pseudomonas strain

454

for coal-based ethylene glycol industry wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut R 2017, 24

455

(12), 11435-11445.

456 457

(4) Ji, B.; Wang, H. Y.; Yang, K., Nitrate and COD removal in an upflow biofilter under an aerobic atmosphere. Bioresource Technol 2014, 158(2), 156-160.

458

(5) Patureau, D.; Helloin, E.; Rustrian, E.; Bouchez, T.; Delgenes, J. P.; Moletta, R., Combined

459

phosphate and nitrogen removal in a sequencing batch reactor using the aerobic denitrifier,

460

Microvirgula aerodenitrificans. Water Res 2001, 35 (1), 189-197.

461

(6) Ji, B.; Yang, K.; Zhu, L.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, H. Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, H. N., Aerobic denitrification:

462

A review of important advances of the last 30 years. Biotechnol Bioproc E 2015, 20 (4),

463

643-651.

464

(7) Bell, L. C.; Richardson, D. J.; Ferguson, S. J., Periplasmic and membrane-bound respiratory

465

nitrate reductases inThiosphaera pantotropha: The periplasmic enzyme catalyzes the first step

466

in aerobic denitrification. Febs Lett 1990, 265 (1), 85-87.

467 468

(8) Sparacino-Watkins, C.; Stolz, J. F.; Basu, P., Nitrate and periplasmic nitrate reductases. Chem Soc Rev 2014, 43 (2), 676-706.

469

(9) Zhu, L.; Ding, W.; Feng, L. J.; Dai, X.; Xu, X. Y., Characteristics of an aerobic denitrifier that

470

utilizes ammonium and nitrate simultaneously under the oligotrophic niche. Environ Sci Pollut

471

R 2012, 19 (8), 3185-3191.

472

(10) Oguz, M. T.; Robinson, K. G.; Layton, A. C.; Sayler, G. S., Concurrent nitrite oxidation and

473

aerobic denitrification in activated sludge exposed to volatile fatty acids. Biotechnol Bioeng

474

2007, 97 (6), 1562-1572. 24


Page 24 of 28

Page 25 of 28


475

(11) Feng, W. W.; Liu, J. F.; Gu, J. D.; Mu, B. Z., Nitrate-reducing community in production water

476

of three oil reservoirs and their responses to different carbon sources revealed by

477

nitrate-reductase encoding gene (napA). Int Biodeter Biodegr 2011, 65 (7), 1081-1086.

478

(12) Simon, J.; Klotz, M. G., Diversity and evolution of bioenergetic systems involved in

479

microbial nitrogen compound transformations. BBA-Bioenergetics 2013, 1827 (2), 114-135.

480

(13) Su, Y. L.; Zheng, X.; Chen, Y. G.; Li, M.; Liu, K., Alteration of intracellular protein

481

expressions as a key mechanism of the deterioration of bacterial denitrification caused by

482

copper oxide nanoparticles. Sci Rep 2015, 5, 15824.

483

(14) Zhou, Q.; Takenaka, S.; Murakami, S.; Seesuriyachan, P.; Kuntiya, A.; Aoki, K., Screening

484

and characterization of bacteria that can utilize ammonium and nitrate ions simultaneously

485

under controlled cultural conditions. J Biosci Bioeng 2007, 103 (2), 185-191.

486

(15) Kim, Y. J.; Yoshizawa, M.; Takenaka, S.; Murakami, S.; Aoki, K., Isolation and culture

487

conditions of a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain that can utilize ammonium and nitrate ions

488

simultaneously with controlled iron and molybdate ion concentrations. Biosci. Biotechnol.

489

Biochem. 2002, 66 (5), 996-1001.

490

(16) Zou, S. Q.; Yao, S.; Ni, J. R., High-efficient nitrogen removal by coupling enriched

491

autotrophic-nitrification and aerobic-denitrification consortiums at cold temperature.

492

Bioresource Technol 2014, 161(s3-4), 288-296.

493

(17) Pintathong, P.; Richardson, D. J.; Spiro, S.; Choorit, W., Influence of metal ions and organic

494

carbons on denitrification activity of the halotolerant bacterium, Paracoccus pantotrophus P16

495

a strain from shrimp pond. Electron J Biotechn 2009, 12 (2), 1723-1729.

496

(18) Sun, M. J.; Wang, H. H.; Zhang, H. F., Effect of Ca2+ and Fe3+ addition on

497

nitriﬁcation-denitriﬁcation process in a membrane bioreactor. Adv Mater R 2013, 610-613,

498

422-427.

499

(19) Chen, H.; Xue, G.; Jiang, M.; Cheng, Y., Advanced nitrogen removal from the biological

500

secondary effluent of dyeing wastewater via a biological-ferric-carbon nitrification and

501

denitrification process. RSC Advances 2016, 6 (108), 106951-106959.

502

(20) Hong Chen, X. Z., Yinguang Chen, Mu Li, Kun Liu, Xiang Li, Influence of copper

503

nanoparticles on the physical-chemical properties of activated sludge. PLoS ONE 2014, 9 (3),

504

e92871.

505

(21) APHA, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed. American 25



506 507 508 509 510 511 512

Public Health Association: Washington, DC: 1998. (22) Choe, S.; Liljestrand, H. M.; Khim, J., Nitrate reduction by zero-valent iron under different pH regimes. Appl Geochem 2004, 19 (3), 335-342. (23) Huang, Y. H.; Zhang, T. C., Effects of low pH on nitrate reduction by iron powder. Water Res 2004, 38 (11), 2631-2642. (24) Huang, Y. H.; Zhang, T. C., Kinetics of nitrate reduction by iron at near neutral pH. J Environ Eng-Asce 2002, 128 (7), 604-611.

513

(25) Liou, Y. H.; Lo, S. L.; Lin, C. J.; Hu, C. Y.; Kuan, W. H.; Weng, S. C., Methods for

514

accelerating nitrate reduction using zerovalent iron at near-neutral pH: Effects of H-2-reducing

515

pretreatment and copper deposition. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39 (24), 9643-9648.

516 517

(26) Zacherl, B.; Amberger, A., Effect of the nitrification inhibitors dicyandiamide, nitrapyrin and thiourea onNitrosomonas europaea. Fertil Res 1990, 22 (1), 37-44.

518

(27) Zou, G.; Papirio, S.; van Hullebusch, E. D.; Puhakka, J. A., Fluidized-bed denitrification of

519

mining water tolerates high nickel concentrations. Bioresource Technol 2015, 179, 284-290.

520

(28) Coates, J. D.; Chakraborty, R.; Lack, J. G.; O'Connor, S. M.; Cole, K. A.; Bender, K. S.;

521

Achenbach, L. A., Anaerobic benzene oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction in pure culture by

522

two strains of Dechloromonas. Nature 2001, 411 (6841), 1039-1043.

523

(29) Scholten, E.; Lukow, T.; Auling, G.; Kroppenstedt, R. M.; Rainey, F. A.; Diekmann, H.,

524

Thauera mechernichensis sp. nov., an aerobic denitrifier from a leachate treatment plant. Int J

525

Syst Bacteriol 1999, 49 (3), 1045-1051.

526

(30) Mergaert, J.; Cnockaert, M. C.; Swings, J., Thermomonas fusca sp. nov. and Thermomonas

527

brevis sp. nov., two mesophilic species isolated from a denitrification reactor with

528

poly(ε-caprolactone) plastic granules as fixed bed, and emended description of the genus

529

Thermomonas. Int J Syst Evol Micr 2003, 53 (6), 1961-1966.

530

(31) Castillo, F.; Dobao, M. M.; Reyes, F.; Blasco, R.; Roldán, M. D.; Gavira, M.; Caballero, F.J.;

531

Martínez-Luque, M., Molecular and regulatory properties of the nitrate reducing systems of

532

rhodobacter. Curr Microbiol 1996, 33 (6), 341-346.

533

(32) Moreno, B.; Gómez, M. A.; González-López, J.; Hontoria, E., Inoculation of a submerged

534

filter for biological denitrification of nitrate polluted groundwater: a comparative study. J

535

Hazard Mater 2005, 117 (2–3), 141-147.

536

(33) Harder, W., Effect of dissolved oxygen tension on the metabolism of methylated amines in 26


Page 26 of 28

Page 27 of 28


537

hyphomicrobium x in the absence and presence of nitrate evidence for aerobic denitrification.

538

Microbiology 1980, 120 (2), 453-463.

539

(34) Trubitsyn, I. V.; Belousova, E. V.; Tutukina, M. N.; Merkel, A. Y.; Dubinina, G. A.; Grabovich,

540

M. Y., Expansion of ability of denitrification within the filamentous colorless sulfur bacteria of

541

the genus Thiothrix. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2014, 358 (1), 72-80.

542

(35) Fallon, R. D.; Hnatow, L. L.; Jackson, S. C.; Keeler, S. J., Method for identification of novel

543

anaerobic denitrifying bacteria utilizing petroleum components as sole carbon source. US,

544

US7740063[P], 2010.

545

(36) Tian, H. L.; Zhao, J. Y.; Zhang, H. Y.; Chi, C. Q.; Li, B. A.; Wu, X. L., Bacterial community

546

shift along with the changes in operational conditions in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor.

547

Appl Microbiol Biot 2015, 99 (7), 3279-90.

548

(37) Zeng, R. J.; Lemaire, R.; Yuan, Z.; Keller, J., Simultaneous nitrification, denitrification, and

549

phosphorus removal in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003, 84 (2),

550

170-178.

551

(38) Kristjansson, J. K.; Hollocher, T. C., First practical assay for soluble nitrous oxide reductase

552

of denitrifying bacteria and a partial kinetic characterization. J Biol Chem 1980, 255

553

(2),704-707.

554

27



Page 28 of 28

TOC

555 556

Activated sludge Iron scrap

Sludge-C

400 Relative Enzyme Activity (%)

Air

Sludge-Fe

350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 NAP

TN was found to remove

Concentration (mg/L)

25

NIR

Denitrification key enzyme

+

NH4 -N -

NO3 -N

20

The quantity of functional gene NapA was increased

TN 15 10

The abundance of aerobic denitrifiers was enhanced

5 0 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Time (h)

SND is simulated by iron scrap under aerobic condition 557 558

28


Iron Robustly Stimulates Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification

Recommend Documents