Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEW ENGLAND ARMIDALE
Functional Structure/Activity Relationships
Joint effects of granule size and degree of substitution on octenylsuccinated sweet potato starch granules as Pickering emulsion stabilizers Li Jinfeng, Fayin Ye, Lin Lei, Yun Zhou, and Guohua Zhao J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05507 • Publication Date (Web): 17 Apr 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 17, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Graphic abstract 366x219mm (300 x 300 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Joint effects of granule size and degree of substitution on
2
octenylsuccinated sweet potato starch granules as Pickering emulsion stabilizers
3
Jinfeng Li†, Fayin Ye†, Lin Lei†, Yun Zhou†, Guohua Zhao*†,‡
4 5 6
†
7
Republic of China
8
‡
9
China
College of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, People’s
Chongqing Sweet Potato Research Centre, Chongqing 400715, People’s Republic of
10
*Corresponding author
11
College of Food Science
12
Southwest University
13
Tiansheng Road 2, Chongqing, 400715
14
PR China
15
Tel.: +86 23 68 25 19 02
16
Fax: +86 23 68 25 19 47
17
E-mail address:
[email protected] (G. Zhao)
18
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 37
Page 3 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
19
ABSTRACT
20
The granules of sweet potato starch were size-fractionated into three portions with
21
significantly different median diameters (D50) of 6.67 (small-sized), 11.54
22
(medium-sized) and 16.96 µm (large-sized), respectively. Each portion was
23
hydrophobized at the mass-based degrees of substitution (DSm) of approximately
24
0.0095 (low), 0.0160 (medium) and 0.0230 (high). The Pickering emulsion stabilizing
25
capacities of modified granules were tested, and the resultant emulsions were
26
characterized. The joint effects of granule size and DSm on emulsifying capacity (EC)
27
were investigated by response surface methodology. For small-, medium- and
28
large-sized fractions, their highest emulsifying capacities are comparable but
29
respectively encountered at high (0.0225), medium (0.0158) and low (0.0095) DSm
30
levels. The emulsion droplet size increased with granule size, and the number of
31
freely scattered granules in emulsions decreased with DSm. In addition, the term of
32
surface density of octenyl succinic group (SD-OSG) was firstly proposed for modified
33
starch granules and it was proved better than DSm in interpreting the emulsifying
34
capacities of starch granules with varying sizes. The present results implied that, as
35
the particulate stabilizers, the optimal DSm of modified starch granules is size specific.
36
KEYWORDS: sweet potato starch, particle size, degree of substitution, Pickering
37
emulsion, emulsifying capacity, joint effect
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
38
■ INTRODUCTION
39
In contrast to the ordinary emulsion stabilized by molecular emulsifiers,
40
the Pickering emulsion is stabilized instead by solid particles, which can adsorb onto
41
the interface between the two immiscible phases.1 Previous research indicated that
42
Pickering emulsions are often more stable against droplet coalescence and Ostwald
43
ripening than emulsions stabilized by molecular surfactants.2,3 Apparently, particles
44
suitable for Pickering stabilization of emulsions should be simultaneously wetted by
45
the two immiscible phases, usually oil as droplets dispersed in water. In this regard,
46
these particles must be amphipathic like molecular surfactants to allow their
47
adsorption onto the interface. This, in turn, results in a particle layer on the surface of
48
the oil droplets. The resultant particle layer prevents the contact between adjacent
49
oil-droplets via steric hindrance and maintains their suspension in water.4 To date,
50
various particles have been verified with Pickering stabilizing capacity. According to
51
chemical attributes, they can be classified into two categories: inorganic and organic
52
particles. The inorganic particles are often represented by silicon dioxide, calcium
53
carbonate and titanium dioxide,5,6 while the organic particles can be further grouped
54
into carbohydrate-,7-9 protein-10-12 and lipid-based particles13 such as microcrystalline
55
cellulose, lactoferrin and glycerol monostearate.
56
To formulate carbohydrate-based particles, starch is an excellent candidate
57
substrate due to its high abundance, low price and easy availability. Recent studies
58
have demonstrated the feasibility of preparing starch-based particles with Pickering
59
stabilizing capacity.14-17 In these cases, two strategies were adopted based on the 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 37
Page 5 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
60
stabilization energy (∆E)-determining equation of ∆E=πr2γow(1-|cosθow|)2, where r is
61
the particle radius, γow is the interfacial tension, and θow is the three-phase contact
62
angle. On the one hand, nanoscale starch particles were prepared to reduce ∆E by
63
decreasing r. On the other hand, naturally occurring micron-scale particles were
64
hydrophobicized to a certain extent by chemical modification to cause θow to approach
65
90o because intact micron-scale starch particles are not wettable by the oil phase
66
because of their poor hydrophobicity.18 In this context, any chemical modification
67
with the ability to increase the hydrophobicity of intact starch particles could favor
68
their Pickering stabilizing capacities such as the esterification by octenyl succinic
69
anhydride (OSA), acetic anhydride or phthalic anhydride.19,20 In this way,
70
hydrophobic groups are attached mainly on the surface of the starch particles,
71
conferring a wettability by the oil phase.21 Among these anhydrides, OSA was most
72
widely used due to its negligible impact on the crystalline pattern of the particles, high
73
efficiency in changing hydrophobicity and the reliable safety of modified
74
products.22-24
75
Although nano-scale starch particles were observed super capacities in
76
stabilizing Pickering emulsion, the naturally occurring starch granules were also
77
investigated as the Pickering stabilizers25,26. This is due to the fact that these granules
78
are easy available and the large particles in Pickering emulsion stabilization certainly
79
resulted in an insurmountable energy barrier to droplet shrinkage beyond a tightly
80
packed monolayer of small particles27. Regarding the Pickering stabilization of
81
octenylsuccinated starch granules, extensive studies have focused on the effects of 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
82
emulsion environmental parameters, the plant origin of starch granules and the degree
83
of substitution (DS)28-30. In reviewing these references, the following problems persist:
84
1) the heterogeneity in granule size of natural starches was not fully considered in
85
these investigations, although recently Saar et al.31 reported the difference between
86
small and large octenylsuccinated waxy barley starch granules in stabilizing a
87
Pickering emulsion; 2) the emulsion stabilization capacity of the modified granules
88
was jointly controlled by the particle size and DS, but their joint effects are seldom
89
determined; 3) the rationality in applying traditional mass-based DS (DSm) to weight
90
the Pickering stabilization capacity should be seriously reconsidered. In principle, the
91
Pickering stabilization capacity of an octenylsuccinated granule is highly dependent
92
on its surface hydrophobicity or the surface density of attached hydrophobic groups
93
other than simply DSm. In detail, given a specific DSm, large particles certainly present
94
a higher surface hydrophobicity than their small counterparts. In this regard, we
95
hypothesized that the surface density of octenyl succinic groups (SD-OSG) would be
96
better in this case. However, information on these problems, and notably the
97
rationality of DSm or SD-OSG is scarce to nonexistent. In this study, the effects of
98
granule size, DS (octenylsuccinated) and homogenization time on the emulsifying
99
capacity (EC), emulsifying stability (ES) and median droplet size (D50) of O/W
100
Pickering emulsion were investigated. The sweet potato starch was selected as the
101
staring material in view of its wide size distribution of granules,32,33 which is easy to
102
be fractioned into three parts with significantly different particle sizes.
103
■ MATERIALS AND METHODS 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 37
Page 7 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
104
Materials. The sweet potato starch used for this study was provided by Yangtian
105
Food Co. Ltd. (Sichuan, China) with a proximate composition of amylose (25.37
106
g/100 g), protein (0.27 g/100 g), lipid (0.78 g/100 g) and ash (0.25 g/100 g). Canola
107
oil was obtained from Yihai Kerry Food Co. Ltd. (Chongqing, China). OSA was
108
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis. MO, USA). The other
109
chemicals were all analytical grade and used as received.
110
Size-fractionation of Sweet Potato Starch. According to the Stokes’ law, the
111
sweet potato starch granules were fractionated into large-, medium- and small-sized
112
parts by a repeated sedimentation process as described by Takeda et al.34 Starch (40 g)
113
was placed in a cylinder (2.0 L, 9.0 cm inside diameter), and water was added to
114
achieve a final volume of 2.0 L. By manual stirring, the starch granules were totally
115
suspended, and the resultant suspension was left undisturbed at room temperature for
116
8 h to allow the intended sedimentation. Then, the turbid layer above the
117
sedimentation was sucked out through a pipette connected to a peristaltic pump. Water
118
with an equal volume of sucked turbid layer was supplemented in the cylinder. The
119
above-mentioned suspension-sedimentation-suck was repeated six times. All the
120
sucked layers were combined and subjected to centrifugation at 3000 g for 10 min.
121
The obtained pellet was washed in triplicate with 200 mL absolute ethanol per
122
washing and then air-dried at room temperature for 48 h to obtain a small-sized
123
fraction (1.7 g). The remaining sediments in the cylinder were treated in the same way
124
as done for the separation of the small-sized fraction instead of a sedimentation time
125
of 3 h. The medium-sized fraction (11.7 g) was obtained from the turbid layers, while 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
126
the final sediment was collected as a large-sized fraction (26.6 g). The size
127
distribution patterns of the starch and its fractions were recorded using a Mastersizer
128
2000 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK) with ultrapure water as the disperse medium
129
and a circulation pump operating at 3000 g .28 The results were expressed as D10, D50,
130
D90 and Span.
131
Octenylsuccination of Sweet Potato Starch. At present, the starch samples are
132
octenylsuccinated according to the procedure described by Song et al.35 The dried
133
starch sample (30 g, db) was introduced into a conical flask (150 mL) containing 70
134
mL distilled water. The flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer was settled in a 35 oC
135
water bath. When the starch mixture was temperature-equilibrated, a pre-settled
136
amount of 25% (w/w) alcoholic OSA solution was added dropwise over 2 h.
137
Subsequently, the resultant slurry was further incubated for 5 h to complete the
138
intended hydrophobic modification. During OSA addition and extended incubation,
139
the pH of the starch slurry was maintained at 8.4 by adding 3% (w/v) NaOH solution.
140
When the modification was completed, the pH of the slurry was adjusted to 7.0 using
141
3% (v/v) HCl solution. Then, the starch slurry was centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min.
142
The pellet that was obtained was washed in triplicate with distilled water. After further
143
triplicate washing with absolute alcohol, the pellet was dried at room temperature for
144
48 h to obtain octenylsuccinated starch. A series of octenylsuccinated products with
145
varying DSm for each starch sample was obtained by applying different amounts of
146
OSA (3.0%, 6.0%, 9.0%, w/w, on dry basis of starch) in the modification. The size
147
distribution patterns of the modified starches were determined as were did for native 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 37
Page 9 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
148
starches.
149
Characterization of Octenylsuccinated Starch. The DSm of the modified starch
150
was determined using a titration method.22 The modified starch sample (1.0 g, db) was
151
weighed accurately and dispersed in 5 mL of 2.5 M HCl-isopropyl alcohol solution by
152
magnetic stirring for 30 min. Then, 20 mL 90% (v/v) aqueous isopropyl alcohol was
153
added to the slurry and stirred for 10 min. Then, the slurry was filtered through a G3
154
sintered funnel, and the residue was washed with 90% (v/v) aqueous isopropyl
155
alcohol until Cl- was absent from the filtrate (detected by 0.1 M AgNO3 solution). The
156
residue was dispersed in 60 mL distilled water and cooked in a boiling water bath for
157
20 min. After cooling to ambient temperature, the starch slurry solution was titrated
158
with 0.1 M standard NaOH solution with phenolphthalein as the indicator. Native
159
starch was used as the blank sample. DSm was calculated using the following
160
equation:
161
DS m =
0.162 ×(A1 − A0)× M / W 1 − [0.210 × ( A1 − A0 ) × M / W ]
162
where A1 and A0 refer to the standard NaOH solution consumed by the sample and the
163
blank, respectively (mL); M is the molarity of the standard NaOH solution (mol/L);
164
W is the sample weight applied (g); 0.162 refers to the molar mass of anhydroglucose
165
unit (kg/mol); and 0.210 is the net increase in the mass of starch with one mole of
166
octenyl succinic group substituted (kg/mol).
167
The SD-OSG, defined as the molar number of octenyl succinic groups attached per
168
square meter of granule surface (mol/m2), was calculated on the basis of mean
169
diameter (R, m), DSm and density of starch (ρ). In order to simplify the calculation of 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 37
170
SD-OSG, the following assumptions were introduced: 1) after the size-fraction, the
171
granules in each portion are supposed with the same size; 2) the octenyl succinic
172
groups were predominately and evenly decorated on the surface of the modified starch
173
granules, which had been evidenced by the previous studies36-38; 3) the densities of
174
various starch fractions were unified as 1.5 g/cm3 due to the insignificant difference
175
among them, namely, 1.48 g/cm3, 1.50 g/cm3 and 1.44 g/cm3 for small-, medium- and
176
large-sized fractions, respectively. For a specific octenylsuccinated starch with a
177
quality of m (g), the number of granules contained could be calculated as
178
m/[4/3π(R/2)3×ρ] = 6m/πR3ρ. Then, the total surface area of these granules was
179
6m/πR3ρ×4π(R/2)2 = 6m/Rρ. Thus, the molar number of octenyl succinic groups on
180
these granules could be calculated as (m/162×DSm), where 162 refers to the molar
181
mass
182
(m/162×DSm)/(6m/Rρ) = 1.54×103×DSm×R (mol/m2).
per
glucosyl
unit.
As
a
result,
SD-OSG could
be
expressed
as
183
The three-phase contact angle (θow) of the starch sample with or without
184
octenylsuccination was measured by a contact angle-measuring device (JC20000D,
185
Zhongchen, China), as described previously.39 The starch sample (0.2 g) was
186
compressed into a disc (10 mm diameter, thickness 1 mm) by using a tablet machine.
187
Then, the resultant disc was completely dipped into a canola oil for 10 s. Then, the
188
disc was picked out, and the excessive oil on its surface was removed by using a piece
189
of filter paper. Subsequently, the disc was transferred onto the object platform of the
190
contact angle-measuring device. A drop of MilliQ water (2 µL) was deposited on the
191
surface of the starch disc via the high-precision injector mounted on the device. After 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
192
a short equilibration (3 s), the drop image was recorded, and the profile of the droplet
193
was numerically solved and fitted to the Laplace-Young equation. The contact angle
194
was measured with three discs per sample and five measurements were performed for
195
each disc.
196
Octenylsuccinated size-fractioned granules were totally dispersed in water at a
197
concentration of 1.0 mg/mL. The zeta potential was measured using a zetasizer
198
instrument (Malvern Nano-ZS90, England), equipped with a HeNe laser beam at a
199
wavelength of 637 nm and a dynamic light scattering of 90̊. Approximately 0.8 mL
200
sample was added to the zeta potential cell and measured after 60 s equilibration at 25
201
ºC.
202
Determination of Emulsifying Capacity and Stability. To prepare O/W
203
Pickering emulsion, octenylsuccinated starch was first suspended in distilled water at
204
a concentration of 3% (w/v). Then, the resultant starch suspension was mixed with the
205
same volume of canola oil, and the mixture obtained was homogenized at 11000 r/min
206
for a preset time. The starch concentration and the volume ratio of water and oil
207
phases were optimized in preliminary experiments according to their effects on the
208
emulsifying capacity (EC) and particle size stability in D50 of the emulsions during
209
storage (See the Supporting Information 1). When the preset time had elapsed, the
210
resultant emulsion (V0, 10 mL) was immediately transferred into a 15-mL graduated
211
glass cylinder (i.d. 1.5 cm). The cylinder was left undisturbed at room temperature,
212
and the volume of the emulsion layer in milliliters was recorded at 24 h (V1d) and 30
213
days (V30d). At the same time, the size distribution of the emulsion at 24 h was 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
214
recorded as was done for the starch samples. The emulsifying capacity (EC) was
215
calculated by the equation of EC=V1d/V0, while the emulsifying stability (ES) was
216
defined as the volume percentage of the emulsion remaining upon 30 days of storage,
217
which was calculated via the equation of ES (%)=V30d/V1d×100%.
218
Recording of the Bulk Appearance and Microstructure of Emulsions. The
219
bulk appearance of the resultant Pickering emulsions prepared under varying
220
conditions was recorded with a camera (Sony a7, Japan). The microstructure of the
221
Pickering emulsions was captured by confocal laser scanning microscopy (ZEISS
222
LSM 800, Germany), which was operated in fluorescence mode. The sample
223
subjected to confocal laser scanning microscopy was stained in advance according to
224
the method described by Yusoff et al. with a slightly modification.40 A mixed
225
fluorescent solution was applied containing Nile blue A and Nile red. They were able
226
to stain starch granules and the oil phase, respectively. Nile blue A and Nile red were
227
dissolved in MilliQ water in advance, and 1,2-propanedio at the same concentration of
228
0.01 mg/mL and the resultant solutions were stored in a dark place. Immediately prior
229
to use, the Nile blue A and Nile red solutions were mixed in a volume ratio of 1:2
230
obtaining the mixed fluorescent solution. An aliquot of the mixed fluorescent solution
231
(20 µL) was spiked into 1 mL of Pickering emulsion, and they were thoroughly mixed.
232
Then, the stained sample (2 µL) was immediately placed into a concave slide, and the
233
coverslip was carefully placed ensuring no air gap entrapped between the sample and
234
coverslip. The fluorescent dyes were excited by an argon laser at 488 nm and a He-Ne
235
laser at 633 nm. Images were recorded at a resolution of 1024 × 1024 pixels at 20 × 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 37
Page 13 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
236
magnification.
237
The microstructure of the emulsion droplets was further analyzed by a Keyence
238
VHX-600 super depth 3D digital microscope fitted with VH-Z20R or VH-Z100R lens
239
(Keyence ,Inc., Charlotte, NC,USA). The emulsions were stained by iodine solution,
240
which prepared by dissolving 0.2 g iodine and 2.0 g potassium iodide in 100 mL
241
distilled water.29 A drop of the stained emulsion was carefully transferred into the
242
cavity of a concave slide. Micro-images of the emulsions and single droplet were
243
recorded at 150× (VH-Z20R ) and 500 × (VH-Z100R) magnifications, respectively.
244
Statistical Analysis. All the measurements were conducted in triplicate unless
245
specified. The results were expressed as means with standard deviation. The statistical
246
significance of the difference between groups was tested by one-way analysis of
247
variance (ANOVA) using SPSS19.0(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In all statistical
248
analyses, p