Limestone Slurry Scrubbing - American

Jack of effectiveness of the aluminum buffer may result from the formation of large ..... Hatfield, J.D., Kim, Y.K. and Mullins, R.C., "Study of the. ...
2 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
12

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

Buffer Additives for Lime/Limestone Slurry Scrubbing GARY T. ROCHELLE, WILLIAM T. WEEMS, RAYMOND J. SMITH, and MARY W. HSIANG University of Texas at Austin, Department of Chemical Engineering, Austin,TX78712 Buffer additives are attractive for enhancing SO removal and/or CaCO utilization in lime/limestone slurry scrubbing processes for flue gas desulfurization. This work was sponsored by EPA to provide experimental data on commercial synthesis, gas/liquid mass transfer enhancement, and oxidative degradation of useful buffer additives. Sulfopropionic and sulfosuccinic acids were synthe­ sized by addition of bisulfite to unsaturated acids. At pH 5, 55°C, and 0.5 Ν ionic strength, the second-order rate constants and activation energies for sulfonation of acrylic, fumaric, and maleic acids were, respectively; 0.21 M min , 14 kcal/gmol; 0.031 M min, 6.1 kcal/ gmol; and 0.52 M min, 17 kcal/gmol. β-Hydroxypropionic acid was synthesized by hydration of acrylic acid at 100 to 140°C with catalysis by H SO or H -loaded cation exchange resin. At 100°C the second-order hydration rate constant was 0.11 M hr with an activation energy of 17 kcal/gmol. Enhancement of SO absorption by buffers was measured at 55°C in 0.3 M NaCl and 0.1 M CaCl for acetic, adipic, hydroxypropionic, sulfopropionic, and sulfosuccinic acids and for basic aluminum sulfate. These results were correlated by mass transfer with equilibrium reactions. Sulfopropionic acid and basic aluminum sulfate were less effective than expected. Relative economics were devel­ oped for these and seven additional buffers. Organic acid oxidation in conjugation with oxidation of CaSO slurry was studied for seven acids. Degradation of adipic acid and other aliphatic and sulfo carboxylic acids was least atpH4.3 with 1.0 mM dissolved Mn and greatest at pH 5.5 without Mn. Hydroxypropionic and hydroxyacetic acids inhibited sulfite oxidation and were less subject to degradation. Fumaric acid degraded faster than the other alternatives. 2

3

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

2

-1

+

4

-1

2

2

3

0097-6156/82/0188-0243$6.75/0 © 1982 American Chemical Society Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

244

FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

The most attractive acids for further testing are adipic, sulfosuccinic, hydroxypropionic, and hydroxyacetic. Lime/limestone slurry scrubbing is the dominant commercial technology for flue gas desulfurization (1). SO2 is absorbed at 50-55°C and pH 5.5-6.0 in an aqueous slurry of excess CaC03 and product solids. The CaS03/CaS04 product is disposed of as solid waste. With greater than 500-1000 ppm SO2 in the flue gas, SO2 absorption is controlled by liquid-film mass transfer resistance because of the limited solubility of SO2 gas and alkaline solids. Additives that buffer between pH 3 and pH 5.5 enhance S02 absorption by providing dissolved alkaline species for reaction with SO2 (8). The most extensive early work on buffer additives was done by TVA who screened a large number of organic acids including adipic, phthalic, and hydroxyacetic (2) and tested benzoic acid in laboratory and pilot plant CaC03 scrubbing systems Ç3,40 . Independently at the same time, Chemico Corp. tested and was issued a patent on the use of formic, acetic, and propionic acids in CaC03 slurry scrubbing (5). Wasag ej: a l . (6)tested several organic acids in a bench-scale scrubber and concluded that citric acid was a superior alternative. Rochelle evaluated additional organic acids including sulfopropionic and sulfosuccinic. He developed a model for mass transfer with irreversible reactions which predicted that as l i t t l e as 3 to 12 mM organic buffer would be effective in improving SO2 absorption (8). He showed that buffer additives should be especially attractive when used with forced oxidation in a limestone slurry scrubbing system (JL) . At the advice of Rochelle, adipic acid was tested by EPA in the 300cfm pilot plant at Research Triangle Park (9) and in the 10 MW scrubbers at the TVA Shawnee power plant (10, 11, 12). The EPA development program has culminated in a 194 MW demonstration at Springfield, Missouri (13). The testing at Shawnee has shown that adipic acid is effective at concentration levels of 3 to 20 mM. SO2 removal at typical operating conditions was increased from 80-85% without adipic acid to 95-99% with 10 to 20 mM adipic acid. Simultaneously limestone utilization was increased from 70-80% to 90-95%. An attractive buffer additive should be inexpensive, should provide mass transfer enhancement at low concentrations, and should be nonvolatile and chemically stable at scrubber conditions This paper is a report of work sponsored by EPA to provide experimental data for the evaluation of buffer additive alternatives . The important classes of inexpensive, nonvolatile buffers include polycarboxylic acids such as adipic, hydroxycarboxylic acids such as hydroxypropionic, and sulfocarboxylic acids such

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

12.

ROCHELLE ET AL.

Lime/Limestone Slurry Scrubbing

245

as s u l f o p r o p i o n i c . Some of these a l t e r n a t i v e s a r e not commer­ c i a l l y a v a i l a b l e and must be synthesized from inexpensive raw materials. Cavanaugh (14) demonstrated the synthesis of hydroxyp r o p i o n i c , s u l f o p r o p i o n i c , and s u l f o s u c c i n i c a c i d s . In t h i s paper, we present q u a n t i t a t i v e r e a c t i o n k i n e t i c s f o r the synthesis of these three a l t e r n a t i v e s (15). Mass t r a n s f e r enhancement depends on the b u f f e r i n g proper­ t i e s and d i f f u s i v i t y of the a d d i t i v e . Cavanaugh (14) measured e f f e c t i v e p k values of b u f f e r a l t e r n a t i v e s at scrubber conditions. Chang and Rochelle (16) developed a model of enhancement based on mass t r a n s f e r with e q u i l i b r i u m r e a c t i o n s and experimentally demonstrated i t s e f f e c t i v e n e s s with a c e t i c and a d i p i c a c i d at 25°C. In t h i s paper, we present experimental and model r e s u l t s at 55°C with s e v e r a l b u f f e r a l t e r n a t i v e s (17). Organic a c i d s are normally s t a b l e to o x i d a t i o n , but l a b o r a t o r y and p i l o t p l a n t r e s u l t s (18) have shown that a d i p i c a c i d o x i d i z e s i n conjugation with s u l f i t e o x i d a t i o n i n the scrubber. T h i s paper r e p o r t s o x i d a t i v e degradation r a t e of a d i p i c a c i d as a f u n c t i o n of pH and Mn concentration (19). Results are a l s o presented on s u l f o p r o p i o n i c , s u l f o s u c c i n i c , s u c c i n i c , hydroxypropionic, and hydroxyacetic a c i d s (20). a

Buffer

Synthesis

Sulfo and hydroxy c a r b o x y l i c a c i d s are a t t r a c t i v e as b u f f e r a d d i t i v e s because the a d d i t i o n a l h y d r o p h i l i c groups make both the b u f f e r and i t s degradation products n o n v o l a t i l e i n aqueous s o l u t i o n . K e l l e r (21) patented the use of s u l f o s u c c i n i c a c i d i n a f l u e gas d e s u l f u r i z a t i o n process using H2S regeneration. Rochelle (7) evaluated a v a i l a b l e k i n e t i c data on s u l f i t e a d d i t i o n to maleic or a c r y l i c a c i d to give s u l f o s u c c i n i c or 3-sulfopropicrric acid. Cavanaugh (14) demonstrated the f e a s i b i l i t y of hydrating a c r y l i c a c i d with H2SO4 c a t a l y s i s at 100°C to get β-hydroxypropionic acid. T h i s paper r e p o r t s measurements of r e a c t i o n k i n e t i c s f o r s u l f o n a t i o n of maleic, fumaric, and a c r y l i c a c i d s by s u l f i t e a d d i t i o n and f o r hydration o f a c r y l i c a c i d with c a t a l y s i s by H2SO4 or c a t i o n exchange r e s i n . The k i n e t i c s were measured by sampling of isothermal batch r e a c t o r s . In s u l f o n a t i o n experiments the extent of r e a c t i o n was determined by i o d i n e t i t r a t i o n f o r t o t a l s u l f i t e . Solutions i n i t i a l l y c o n t a i n i n g 0.05 to 0.20 M unsaturated a c i d were main­ tained at approximate pH values by l a c t a t e , acetate, or phosphate b u f f e r s . NaCl, CaCl2, or MgCl2 were added to give changes i n i o n i c environment. In hydration experiments, a c r y l i c a c i d was determined by i o n e x c l u s i o n chromatography (ICE) on a Dionex i o n chromatograph. Hydroxypropionic a c i d was evident on the chromatograms, but was not q u a n t i f i e d because of the l a c k of an adequate standard. Hydration was c a t a l y z e d a t 100 to 140°C by 0.1 to 1.5 M H2SO4 or

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

246

FLUE

GAS D E S U L F U R I Z A T I O N

by ΙΓ^-Ioaded s u l f o n a t e d p o l y s t y r e n e r e s i n (Dowex 50W-X4) w i t h an exchange c a p a c i t y of 1.3 meq/cm^ (wet b a s i s ) and 67% moisture content.

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

S u l f o c a r b o x y l i c A c i d s . Measured s u l f o n a t i o n r a t e constants are presented i n Table I. The s u l f o n a t i o n r e a c t i o n s f o l l o w a second-order mechanism: r a t e (M/min) = k [ a c i d ] g

[SO^

T

The r a t e constants do not vary s i g n i f i c a n t l y from pH 3.5 to 7.0, but no r e a c t i o n occurs a t pH 2 or 13. The s u l f o n a t i o n r a t e s increase with i o n i c s t r e n g t h . With fumaric and maleic a c i d s , there may a l s o be an a d d i t i o n a l c a t a l y t i c e f f e c t of Mg*"*" or Ca"*"*. The second-order r a t e constants (M" min" ) f o r s u l f o n a t i o n at 1.2 Ν i o n i c strength i n N a s o l u t i o n s at pH are given by: 1

1

+

8

acrylic: k

s

= 4.48 χ 1 0 exp (-14,100/RT)

fumaric: k

s

= 372 exp (-6100/RT)

s

= 2.38 χ 1 0

maleic:

k

1 1

exp (-17,500/RT) 1

1

At 55°C with 0.5N i o n i c s t r e n g t h the constants a r e 0.21 M" m i n " f o r a c r y l i c , 0.031 M" min"" f o r fumaric, and 0.52 M" m i n " f o r maleic. At 80°C, Hagglund and Ringbom (22) measured r a t e constants of 0.3 to 0.8 M" m i n " f o r a c r y l i c a c i d , 0.086 M" m i n " f o r fumaric a c i d , and 0.16 M" m i n " f o r maleic a c i d . These compare to our e x t r a p o l a t e d values a t 80°C of 0.96, 0.062 and 3.5 M" min" , r e s p e c t i v e l y . Our higher value with maleic a c i d may be a r e s u l t of higher i o n i c s t r e n g t h or d i f f e r e n t pH. At 25°C and pH 3-5, Van Der Zanden (23) measured r a t e constants of 0.0019 M" m i n " and 0.0040 M min~T f o r fumaric and maleic a c i d s , r e s p e c t i v e l y , compared to our higher values of 0.012 and 0.035 M" min" . Morton and L a n d f i e l d (24) measured a c t i v a t i o n energies of 12.4 to 18.0 kcal/gmol f o r s u l f o n a t i o n of s e v e r a l unsaturated n i t r i l e s and e s t e r s , comparable to our values f o r maleic and a c r y l i c a c i d s . However, our s u l f o n a t i o n r a t e s a t 25°C f o r a c r y l i c and maleic a c i d s are 50 to 100 times f a s t e r than the measured r a t e s f o r a c r y l o n i t r i t e and methyl a e r y l a t e . Because d i s s o l v e d s u l f i t e i s present i n a t y p i c a l Ca0/CaC03 scrubber system, i t i s conceivable that unsaturated a c i d s would s u l f o n a t e i f added d i r e c t l y to the scrubber system. For the s u l f o n a t i o n r e a c t i o n s , a scrubber system can be c h a r a c t e r i z e d as a completely s t i r r e d tank r e a c t o r with a residence time equal to the r a t i o of s o l u t i o n inventory and the r a t e of l o s s of s o l u t i o n with the waste s o l i d s . Assuming 10 mM t o t a l d i s s o l v e d s u l f i t e , 55°C, 0.5 Ν i o n i c strength, and 130 hours residence time, the f r a c t i o n of unsulfonated a c i d that would leave the system i s 6% 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

- 1

1

1

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

12.

ROCHELLE ET AL.

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

Table I :

S u l f o n a t i o n Rates of Unsaturated T o t a l Na (M)

jpH T(°C) A c r y l i c Acid 4.2 25 4.8 24 24 4.8 4.9 25 26 4.9 3.3 55 3.6 55 4.3 55 55 4.3 4.9 55 6.8 55 Fumaric A c i d 5.4 25 4.3 55 4.7 55 55 4.9 6.1 55 7.1 55 12.9 55 Maleic Acid 4.7 25 3.3 55 4.6 55 5.1 55 a

plus

247

Lime/'Limestone Slurry Scrubbing

0.5 M C a * , 4

Strength (N)

(M

_1

min-

0.70 0.95

0.45 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.45 1.05 0.35 1.60 2.10 0.35 0.47

0.020 0.022 0.021 0.025 0.027 0.21 0.21 0.43 0.46 0.20 0.20

1.24 0.98 1.26 0.40 1.32 1.25 1.21

0.45 0.49 0.63 1.0 0.66 0.62 0.60

0.012 0.033 0.031 0.11 0.038 0.031 NR

0.45 1.05 0.54 0.90

0.035 0.31 0.52 0.97

0.90 0.70 0.80 0.80 0.90 0.10 0.70 3.20

a

0.20C

b

0.90 0.10* 1.08 0.20b b

Ionic

Acids

plus

0.4 M Mg"* ,

44

plus 1.0 M Mg ".

Table I I : Hydration of A c r y l i c A c i d H2SO4 A c r y l i c Acid kh (M-lhr-1) (M) (M) NR 1.5 2.0 0.11 1.0 2.0 0.11 resin 2.0 0.20 1.5 2.0 0.15 0.5 2.0 0.26 0.5 4.0 0.18 0.1 2.0 NR 0 2.0 0.38 1.0 1.9 >1.6 1.5 2.0 a

ί

T(°C) 55 100 100 105 105 105 105 105 120 140

b

a

—χ — j . forward + reverse r a t e constants (M hr ) ^includes polymerization

American Chemical Society Library 1155 16th St., N.W.

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization Washington, O.C. 20036 ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

248

FLUE

GAS

DESULFURIZATION

f o r a c r y l i c , 29% f o r fumaric, and 4% f o r maleic. Therefore, i n s i t u s u l f o n a t i o n i s f e a s i b l e f o r a c r y l i c a c i d and maleic a c i d , but i s only p a r t i a l l y e f f e c t i v e f o r fumaric a c i d . A c r y l i c a c i d and maleic anhydride (the commercial form of maleic a c i d ) r e q u i r e some precautions f o r safe handling. I f these precautions are unacceptable to the user, these unsaturated a c i d s can be e a s i l y s u l f o n a t e d o f f s i t e by r e a c t i o n with sodium sulfite. Sodium s u l f o s u c c i n a t e was prepared s u c c e s s f u l l y by adding 3.3 gmol Na2S03 and 3.0 gmol maleic anhydride to one l i t e r of water. The temperature increased from 25 to 80 C and the s o l i d s d i s s o l v e d w i t h i n one minute. The s o l u t i o n d i d not p r e c i p i t a t e when cooled to 6°C. Therefore, the sulfonated a c i d s could probably be prepared i n a tank car and shipped as concen­ t r a t e d s o l u t i o n d i r e c t l y to the user. S u l f o p r o p i o n i c and s u l f o s u c c i n i c a c i d s were prepared f o r subsequent l a b o r a t o r y use by mixing 1 gmol Na2S03 and 1 gmol a c r y l i c or maleic a c i d i n 1 l i t e r of water at 55°C f o r 10 to 15 hours. U t i l i z a t i o n of the s u l f i t e was 95 to 98% as determined by iodine t i t r a t i o n . Hydroxypropionic A c i d (HP). Measured h y d r a t i o n r a t e f o r a c r y l i c a c i d are presented i n Table I I . The h y d r a t i o n r e a c t i o n i s f i r s t - o r d e r i n a c r y l i c a c i d (AA) and f i r s t - o r d e r i n H"*". The r e a c t i o n i s r e v e r s i b l e at high conversions, but the data i n Table 2 were taken at low conversions and assume the r e a c t i o n i s i r r e v e r s i b l e so that only the forward r a t e constant i s given. The net r e a c t i o n r a t e i s given by: r a t e (M/hr) = k^H+HAA] - ( k /Κ) [H+] [HP] f

where the e q u i l i b r i u m constant Κ i s defined by: Κ = [HP]/[AA] +

In Table 2, the H concentrations were estimated assuming 1 mole tf^/mole H2SO4 or from the nominal exchange c a p a c i t y of the r e s i n . The second-order forward r a t e constant (M"" h r ~ l ) f o r both r e s i n and H2SO4 c a t a l y s i s i s c o r r e l a t e d by: 1

k

h

= 1.14

χ 10

9

exp

(-17,000/RT)

In at l e a s t one experiment (105°C, 4 M AA, 0.5 M H2SO4) there was v i s u a l evidence of a c r y l i c a c i d p o l y m e r i z a t i o n , g i v i n g a f a s t e r apparent r a t e constant. P o l y m e r i z a t i o n should be minimized by reduced a c r y l i c a c i d concentrations and increased c a t a l y s t concentrations.

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

12.

ROCHELLE ET AL.

Lime ILimestone Slurry Scrubbing

249

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

Pressman and Lucas (25) measured r a t e s and e q u i l i b r i u m f o r up to 0.05 M a c r y l i c a c i d i n p e r c h l o r i c a c i d with the f o l l o w i n g results : 1

T(°C)

k (M^hr" )

Κ

110.6 119.8 134.7

0.159 0.296

11.3 9.27 6.79

f

Their a c t i v a t i o n energy (20.4 kcal/gmol) was somewhat higher than ours (17 kcal/gmol). T h e i r r a t e constant a t 120°C (0.296 M-l-hr" ) was somewhat lower than ours (0.38 M ^ h r " ) . Using our measured r a t e data and e q u i l i b r i a from Pressman and Lucas, the estimated r e a c t o r residence times f o r 85% conversion with 1 M H2SO4 a t 105°C are 14 hours f o r a batch or plug flow r e a c t o r , 85 hours f o r a s i n g l e completely s t i r r e d tank r e a c t o r (CSTR), or 33 hours f o r two CSTR's i n s e r i e s . I f the r e a c t i o n was c a r r i e d out at the scrubber s i t e , no a d d i t i o n a l p u r i f i c a t i o n should be r e q u i r e d , but there would be a makeup requirement f o r s u l f u r i c a c i d . Hydroxypropionic a c i d f o r subsequent l a b o r a t o r y t e s t s was taken from the f i n a l s o l u t i o n of the experiment a t 105°C with 2 M a c r y l i c a c i d and 1.5 M H2SO4. A f t e r 13 hours the t o t a l conversion of a c r y l i c a c i d to hydroxypropionic a c i d was 85%. 1

1

Gas/Liquid Mass T r a n s f e r Enhancement Chang and Rochelle (16) measured SO2 a b s o r p t i o n a t 25°C i n a continuous s t i r r e d r e a c t o r with an unbroken g a s / l i q u i d interface. They v a r i e d Ps02> Ρ**» and concentrations of a c e t i c a c i d and a d i p i c a c i d i n 0.3 M NaCl. Because SO2 absorption was q u a n t i f i e d by l i q u i d - p h a s e m a t e r i a l balance, there were no experiments with greater than 1 mM t o t a l d i s s o l v e d s u l f i t e . The apparatus used by Chang and Rochelle was modified f o r t h i s work (17). Heating tape was added to l i q u i d and gas stream i n l e t s to permit o p e r a t i o n at 55°C. Gas phase a n a l y s i s and flow measurement were r e f i n e d , and S02 a b s o r p t i o n r a t e was determined by gas-phase m a t e r i a l balance, p e r m i t t i n g o p e r a t i o n with high concentrations of s u l f a t e and t o t a l s u l f i t e . T i g h t e r pH c o n t r o l was achieved by continuously adding 1.0 M NaOH d i r e c t l y to the reactor. The apparatus was c h a r a c t e r i z e d a t 55°C and 540 rpm by SO2 absorption i n t o 0.3 M NaOH g i v i n g k A of 4.93 χ 1 0 ~ gmol/bar-sec and i n t o 0.3 M HC1 g i v i n g k?A of 1.5 χ 10~3&/sec. Experiments were performed i n 0.3 M NaCl or 0.1 M C a C l at pH 5.5 or 4.2 with 0 to 40 mM of a d i p i c , a c e t i c , s u l f o p r o p i o n i c , s u l f o s u c c i n i c , o r hydroxypropionic a c i d s or AICI3. The gas-phase SO2 c o n c e n t r a t i o n was adjusted to give about 1000 ppm at the g a s - l i q u i d i n t e r f a c e . The enhancement of the l i q u i d - f i l m mass t r a n s f e r c o e f f i c i e n t by 3

g

2

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

FLUE

250

GAS

DESULFURIZATION

chemical r e a c t i o n was c a l c u l a t e d from S02 a b s o r p t i o n r a t e , SO2 gas c o n c e n t r a t i o n , SO2 Henry s constant, k°A, and kgA as i n Chang and Rochelle (16). Chang and Rochelle (16) developed an enhancement f a c t o r model based on approximate s u r f a c e renewal with m u l t i p l e e q u i l i brium r e a c t i o n s . T h e i r model i n c l u d e d e q u i l i b r i a among and d i f f u s i o n of the s o l u t i o n s p e c i e s : H+, SO2, HSO3, SO3, H2A, HA™, and A". The pK values of the b u f f e r s p e c i e s , H2A, HA~, and A~, could be adjusted to represent any a p p r o p r i a t e b u f f e r . A c t i v i t y c o e f f i c i e n t s were c a l c u l a t e d from a modified DebyeHuckel l i m i t i n g law (26). The model of Chang and R o c h e l l e (16) was used i n t h i s work with a p p r o p r i a t e e q u i l i b r i u m constants and d i f f u s i v i t i e s to represent o p e r a t i o n at 55°C i n 0.3 M NaCl or 0.1 M CaCl2 (Tables I I I and IV). Because the model uses only d i f f u s i v i t y r a t i o s , the d i f f u s i v i t i e s i n NaCl s o l u t i o n were taken to be the same as those at i n f i n i t e d i l u t i o n and 25°C (16), assuming that the d i f f u s i v i t y r a t i o s were independent of temperature and NaCl c o n c e n t r a t i o n . The e q u i l i b r i u m constants i n NaCl s o l u t i o n were g e n e r a l l y assumed to be independent of temperature and are based p r i m a r i l y on measurements by Cavanaugh (14) and the e q u i l i b r i u m program by Lowell et a l . , (26). The s o l u b i l i t y of u n d i s s o c i a t e d SO2 i n water was given by Rabe and H a r r i s (27): f

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

a

[S0 ] 2

=

P O / S

H = exp

H

2

(-9.3795 + 2851.1/T)

E f f e c t i v e e q u i l i b r i u m constants i n 0.1 M CaCl2 were measured by Cavanaugh (14) or estimated by the Radian e q u i l i b r i u m program (26). As given i n Table IV, these constants i n c l u d e the e f f e c t s of i o n i c s t r e n g t h and i o n p a i r i n g on the a c t i v i t y of the anions. Ion p a i r s , such as CaSOg, are not t r e a t e d as separate s p e c i e s , but are accounted f o r as an e f f e c t on the a c t i v i t y of simple i o n s , such as SO3. E m p i r i c a l l y , i t was found that d i f f u s i v i t i e s i n 0.1 M C a C ^ were c o n s i s t e n t l y l e s s than i n 0.3 M NaCl. To get good c o r r e l a t i o n of the experimental data the d i f f u s i v i t i e s of a l l monovalent anions were reduced 25% and the d i f f u s i v i t i e s of a l l d i v a l e n t anions were reduced 45% from t h e i r values i n 0.3 M NaCl. Weems (17) presents more extensive data on the e f f e c t s of Na , Mg"*"*", and C a ^ on the d i f f u s i v i t i e s of SO3 and HSO3. F i g u r e 1 compares c a l c u l a t e d and measured values of the l i q u i d - f i l m enhancement f a c t o r with f i v e b u f f e r s . The c a l c u l a t e d values are w i t h i n 10% of the measured v a l u e s . In order to f i t the measured data, the d i f f u s i v i t y of s u l f o p r o p i o n i c a c i d was reduced by an a d d i t i o n a l 50% from the value estimated by Chang and Rochelle (16). +

-

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

12.

ROCHELLE ET AL.

251

Lime/Limestone Slurry Scrubbing

Table I I I . P h y s i c a l P r o p e r t i e s at 55°C, 0.3 M NaCl Buffer

5 2 D i f f u s i v i t i e s χ 10 (cm /sec) pKf Values H A A HA ρκι pK2 4.66 1.09 1.19 4.07f 5.10 0.72 0.71 0.74 4.05 0.87 1.21 3.60 1.43 1.46 3.60 0.98 0.91 4.33 0.91 0.99 3.60 0.91 0.99 3.02 4.6 0.72 0.69 0.71 5.25 4.10 0.81 0.86 0.84 4.06 0.40 0.45 3.33 4.84 0.66 0.73 0.70 4.08 2.97 0.81 0.86 0.84 1.55 0.90 1.20 2.02 7.4 0.98 1.76 1.33

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

2

Acetic Adipic Benzoic Formic Hydroxyacetic Hydroxypropionic Lactic Phthalic Succinic Sulfopropionic Sulfosuccinic Fumaric Sulfate Sulfite

d

b

a

b

a

b

f

e

a

f

a

f

a

f

a

a

b

a

b

f

f

a

f

b

a

e

M e a s u r e d by A l b e r y

f

b

b

b

b

e t a l . (28) or estimated by h i s method,

Estimated from i o n i c c o n d u c t i v i t i e s i n Ref. 29, C

d

6

f

g

R e f . 30, R e f . 31, R e f . 32, R e f . 14, K

Table IV:

5 2 D i f f u s i v i t i e s χ 10 (cm /sec) p K Values pKi A H2A HA pK2 4.45 0.82 1.19 4.86 3.98 0.39 0.54 0.74 3.90 1.21 0.65 3.45 1.07 1.46 3.42 0.68 0.98 4.26 0.68 0.99 3.36 0.68 0.99 2.82 4.4 0.38 0.72 0.53 5.01 3.86 0.45 0.86 0.53 4.06 0.30 0.45 4.43 3.14 0.36 0.55 0.39 3.84 2.73 0.45 0.86 0.53 1.60 1.20 0.68 6.2 2.02 0.57 1.00 1.76 e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

a

b

b

b

a

H+

a

Acetic Adipic Benzoic Formic Clycolic Hydroxypropionic Lactic Phthalic Succinic Sulfopropionic Sulfosuccinic Fumerie Sulfate Sulfite K

= a [A~]/[HA].

P h y s i c a l P r o p e r t i e s a t 55°C. 0.1 M CaCl?

Buffer

a

a

C

= a +[A-]/[HA], R e f . 26, R e f . 14. H

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

b

e

FLUE

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

252

GAS D E S U L F U R I Z A T I O N

Figure 1. Comparison of measured and calculated liquid-film enhancement factors with 0 to 40 mM buffer and 1000 ppm S0 at pH 5.5 and 25°C. Key: O, sulfosuccinic in 0.3 M NaCl; · , sulf osuccinic in 0.1 M CaCl ; A, hydroxypropionic in 0.1 M CaCU; • , sulfopropionic in 0.3 M NaCl; | , sulfopropionic in 0.1 M CaCh; V , acetic in 0.3 M NaCl; acetic in 0.1 M CaCU; +, adipic in 0.1 M CaCU; 0 > adipic in 0.3 M NaCl (pH 4.2); and • , adipic in 0.1 M CaCU (pH 4.2). 2i

2

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

12.

ROCHELLE ET AL.

Lime ILimestone Slurry Scrubbing

Experiments w i t h up to 20mM AICI3 i n 0.1 M CaCl2 a t pH 3.8 gave no measureable enhancement of SO2 absorption, even though b a s i c aluminum c h l o r i d e i s an e x c e l l e n t b u f f e r a t pH 3.8. The Jack of e f f e c t i v e n e s s of the aluminum b u f f e r may r e s u l t from the formation of l a r g e , slow-moving polynuclear aluminum complexes, or i t m a y r e f l e c t a slow r e a c t i o n r a t e between aluminum complexes and H . F i g u r e 2 shows the c a l c u l a t e d l i q u i d - f i l m enhancement f a c t o r f o r f i v e b u f f e r s as a f u n c t i o n of b u f f e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n 0.1 M CaCl2 a t pH 5.5 w i t h 1000 ppm SO2 a t the g a s / l i q u i d i n t e r f a c e . On a m o l a r i t y b a s i s , a d i p i c a c i d i s most a t t r a c t i v e and s u l f o ­ p r o p i o n i c a c i d i s l e a s t a t t r a c t i v e . With no b u f f e r , the enhance­ ment f a c t o r i s 7.2 because o f the h y d r o l y s i s of SO2 and because of enhancement by SO3. At 10 mM t o t a l a d i p i c a c i d , the enhancement f a c t o r i s 20, o r about 3 times greater than i n the absence of buffer. F i g u r e 3 i l l u s t r a t e s the e f f e c t of a d i p i c a c i d on the o v e r a l l enhancement of SO2 absorption. I t gives the r a t i o of the o v e r a l l mass t r a n s f e r c o e f f i c i e n t , Kg, to the g a s - f i l m c o e f f i c i e n t , kg, as a f u n c t i o n of a dimensionless parameters i n c l u d i n g a d i p i c a c i d concentration. The o v e r a l l c o e f f i c i e n t i n c l u d e s an e f f e c t of k and the l i q u i d - f i l m enhancement f a c t o r which increases with a d i p i c a c i d concentration. The r a t i o , Kg/kg, represents the f r a c t i o n r e s i s t a n c e of the gas f i l m and cannot exceed 1.0. Greater values of Kg/kg represent p r o p o r t i o n a t e l y b e t t e r scrubber performance. This s p e c i f i c f i g u r e i s v a l i d f o r scrubbers with r a t i o of mass t r a n s f e r c o e f f i c i e n t s without enhancement given by H kg/kg equal to 0.2. As shown i n Figure 3, a d i p i c a c i d w i l l have a greater e f f e c t with higher SO2 gas concentration, because a t lower concentration S02 absorption i s already c o n t r o l l e d mostly by gas f i l m r e s i s t a n c e . With l e s s t o t a l d i s s o l v e d s u l f i t e , l i q u i d - f i l m r e s i s t a n c e i s reduced by SO2 h y d r o l y s i s to ΐ& and HSO3, even i n the absence of buffer. In a l l cases, the curves asymptote t o gas phase c o n t r o l with an a b s c i s s a v a l u e of 10 to 40. 10 mM a d i p i c a c i d and 10 mM s u l f i t e a t pH 5 w i t h 2500 ppm SO2 gives Kg/kg of 0.91. This corresponds to an improvement of 1.8 because of a d i p i c a c i d addition. Table V gives the c a l c u l a t e d concentrations of twelve b u f f e r s r e q u i r e d to get an enhancement f a c t o r of 20 i n 0.1 M CaCl2 with 10 mM t o t a l s u l f i t e a t pH 5.0 with 1000 ppm SO2 a t the gas l i q u i d interface. R e l a t i v e costs have been c a l u c l a t e d assuming that makeup r a t e s would be p r o p o r t i o n a l to concentration Formic and a c e t i c a c i d s are most a t t r a c t i v e , but would prob­ ably be v o l a t i l e under scrubber c o n d i t i o n s (8). S u c c i n i c and l a c t i c a c i d s would not be c o s t - e f f e c t i v e i f purchased a t market price. Fumaric a c i d i s more subject to o x i d a t i v e degradation. P h t h a l i c and Benzoic a c i d s may give undesirable aromatic degrada­ t i o n products. Therefore, the most u s e f u l b u f f e r s appear to be hydroxypropionic, s u l f o s u c c i n i c , fumaric, s u l f o p r o p i o n i c , a d i p i c , and hydroxyacetic. +

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

253

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

254

FLUE

0

5

10

BUFFER CONCENTRATION

GAS

15

DESULFURIZATION

20

(mM)

Figure 2. Calculated effect of buffer alternatives on the liquid-film enhancement factor, 0.1 M CaCl , 55°C, pH 5.5, 3 mM total sulfite, 1000 ppm S0 . 2

041

1 2 (HP Figure 3.

2i

, S 0 2 +

ι

1 1 1

I

5 10 15 20 40 [HA-] + 2[A=])/HP S 0 2

Overall mass transfer enhancement by adipic acid, 55 °C, 0.1 M CaCU pH 5. Total sulfite: ,0 mM; and , 10 mM.

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

12.

ROCHELLE ET AL.

Lime jLimestone Slurry Scrubbing

255

Table V: R e l a t i v e Costs of Organic A c i d s , 0=20, 55°C, pH 5.0, 0.1 M CaCl2, 10 mM t o t a l s u l f i t e , lOOOppm SQ2L Concentration Price Relative Organic A c i d (mM) ($/lb mol) Cost Formic 21.1 12.28 0.28 Acetic 21.62 15.6 0.37 Hydrosypropionic 19.7 0.75 34.59 Sulfosuccinic 16.3 0.77 43.15 Sulfopropionic 25.6 34.59 0.97 Adipic 11.8 1.00 77.45 Phthalic 18.1 55.58 1.10 Benzoic 17.0 57.46 1.13 Fumaric 19.1 1.38 66.16 Hydroxyacetic 32.0 39.66 1.39 Succinic 12.3 1.80 134.11 Lactic 78.82 34.4 2.97 Oxidative

Degradation

Unexpected l o s s of a d i p i c a c i d accompanied by v a l e r i c a c i d odor was f i r s t observed by Borgwardt (9) i n p i l o t p l a n t t e s t i n g of a d i p i c a c i d with f o r c e d o x i d a t i o n . These observations were confirmed by l a r g e r s c a l e t e s t s a t the Shawnee t e s t f a c i l i t y (10). A d d i t i o n a l Shawnee r e s u l t s have shown that unexpected l o s s e s a r e reduced a t pH l e s s than 5.0 and increased by forced o x i d a t i o n (12). Radian analyzed f i e l d samples and found s i g n i f i c a n t q u a n t i t i e s of v a l e r i c a c i d and g l u t a r i c a c i d (18). They were able to d u p l i c a t e t h i s degradation of a d i p i c a c i d by o x i d i z i n g CaS03 s l u r r y i n the presence of a d i p i c a c i d (33, 34). Later more extensive work by Radian has shown that unexpected l o s s e s of a d i p i c a c i d can a l s o occur by i t s c o p r e c i p i t a t i o n i n CaS03 s o l i d s (35)· Conjugated o x i d a t i o n of c a r b o x y l i c acids probably occurs by r e a c t i o n with f r e e r a d i c a l s generated by s u l f i t e o x i d a t i o n . There i s extensive l i t e r a t u r e on the conjugated o x i d a t i o n of c a r b o x y l i c a c i d s with the o x i d a t i o n of hydrocarbons or a l c o h o l s (36, 37, 38). The products of such conjugated o x i d a t i o n are C02 and mono or d i c a r b o x y l i c a c i d s of shorter chain length than the o r i g i n a l acid. Hence, conjugated o x i d a t i o n o f a d i p i c a c i d could give CO2, g l u t a r i c a c i d , v a l e r i c a c i d and perhaps s u c c i n i c a c i d and b u t y r i c acid. The r a t e of c a r b o x y l i c a c i d o x i d a t i o n should be p r o p o r t i o n a l to the r a t e of s u l f i t e o x i d a t i o n and the a c i d concentration:

d[A]

kJA]

d[S05]T ""d

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

256

FLUE

With batch o x i d a t i o n of is:

CaS03

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

DESULFURIZATION

s l u r r y the i n t e g r a t e d r a t e equation

ln([A]./[A]) = k ([SO=] . d

GAS

T

-

[SO^)

The r a t e constant, kd, should be reduced at higher d i s s o l v e d s u l f i t e because of reduced f r e e r a d i c a l concentrations at a given o x i d a t i o n r a t e . The degradation r a t e may also be a f f e c t e d by s u l f i t e o x i d a t i o n c a t a l y s t s or i n h i b i t o r s that would change the concentrations and types of intermediate f r e e r a d i c a l species. In t h i s work, o x i d a t i o n of 5 to 20 mM c a r b o x y l i c a c i d has been measured during batch o x i d a t i o n of 1 to 2 M CaS03 s l u r r y at 55°C with pure oxygen sparged i n t o an a g i t a t e d r e a c t o r . CaS03 s o l i d s were u s u a l l y synthesized by t i t r a t i o n of 1 M CaCl2 with 1 M Na2S03 followed by f i l t e r i n g , washing, and d r y i n g . Slurry was analyzed f o r t o t a l s u l f i t e by iodine t i t r a t i o n . Filtered s o l u t i o n was analyzed f o r the s p e c i f i c c a r b o x y l i c acids by a Dionex i o n chromatograph using i o n chromatography (IC) or i o n e x c l u s i o n chromatography (ICE) (19). I n i t i a l work was performed i n a g l a s s r e a c t o r with good temperature c o n t r o l but no pH c o n t r o l . During the experiment pH d r i f t e d upward and the r a t e of o x i d a t i o n decreased. The g l a s s r e a c t o r was p o o r l y a g i t a t e d and complete o x i d a t i o n of 2 M CaS03 s l u r r y required 15 to 20 hours, even with 110 ml/min of oxygen. Later work was performed i n a p l e x i g l a s s r e a c t o r with pH c o n t r o l by continuous a d d i t i o n of H2SO4. Because of poor thermal c o n d u c t i v i t y , the temperature i n t h i s r e a c t o r increased from 55 to 70 or 80°C during the course of an experiment. The oxygen flow r a t e was 110 cm^/min. With a g i t a t i o n at 950 rpm, the maximum s u l f i t e o x i d a t i o n r a t e was 0.4 to 0.5 M/hr; at 1340 rpm, i t was 0.6 to 0.7 M/hr. In a t y p i c a l experiment 5 to 10 samples were analyzed f o r c a r b o x y l i c a c i d and t o t a l s u l f i t e . The r a t e constant, k^, was obtained from a p l o t of £n[A] versus t o t a l s u l f i t e . Figures 4 and 5 show r e s u l t s of a t y p i c a l experiment. Table VI summarizes the r e s u l t s of experiments with a d i p i c , s u l f o s u c c i n i c , s u l f o p r o p i o n i c , s u c c i n i c , g l y c o l i c and hydroxyp r o p i o n i c a c i d s . The r e s u l t s are reported as the s u l f i t e _^ o x i d a t i o n r a t e (M/hr) and the degradation r a t e constant, kç[(M ). A n a l y t i c a l accuracy g e n e r a l l y allowed determination of kd w i t h i n t 0.1 M""l. In experiments with l i t t l e or no s u l f i t e o x i d a t i o n , ( A l l , HP3, HP5, HAÏ, HA3, HA4), there was no measurable degradat i o n of the c a r b o x y l i c a c i d . Experiments with 5, 10, and 20 mM a d i p i c a c i d (A21, A14, A18, A15, A23) showed that the degradation r e a c t i o n i s f i r s t order i n the c a r b o x y l i c a c i d concentration, as expected and modelled by k^.

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

12.

ROCHELLE ET AL.

Lime ILimestone Slurry Scrubbing

TIME

Figure 4.

0.0

Sulfite oxidation in two typical experiments.

0.2

0.4

TOTAL

Figure 5.

(hr)

0.6 SULFITE

0.8 ( M )

Adipic acid degradation in two typical experiments.

Hudson and Rochelle; Flue Gas Desulfurization ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.

257

FLUE

258

GAS D E S U L F U R I Z A T I O N

Table VI! O x i d a t i v e Degradation of C a r b o x y l i c A c i d s

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on April 16, 2018 | https://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: July 1, 1982 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

Run

£H

Other Component (mM)

a

S u l f i t e Oxidation Rate (M/hr)

Degradation Rate (M~l)

Glass Reactor, 110 ml/min O2, 500 ml s l u r r y S u l f o s u c c i n i c (SS) SSI 5.0+ 0.07

-1.0

S u l f o p r o p i o n i c (SP) SP1 5.0+

0.07

-1.0

A d i p i c (A) Al 5.0+ A4 4.3+ A5 5.0+

0.06 0.04 0.04

-1.5 -1.1 1.7

P l e x i g l a s s r e a c t o r , 110 ml/min O2, 950 rpm, 1 L s l u r r y A7 4.3 1 Fe++ 0.46 1.2 A8ic 5.0 0.1+ Mn 0.37 0.3 A82 5.0 0.38 2.0 A83C 5.0 0.1+ Mn 0.35 0.4 A9 5.0 300 Na