Lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn ... - ACS Publications

Oct 18, 2017 - Reg3g. F(5′-3′): CTCCCGTGCCTATGGCTCCTATT. R(5′-3′): CGCCACTGAGCACAGACACAAG. Table 2. Effects of LPPE on General ...
4 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Florida | Smathers Libraries

Article

Lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) pulp phenolic extract provides protection against alcoholic liver injury in mice by alleviating intestinal microbiota dysbiosis, intestinal barrier dysfunction and liver inflammation Juan Xiao, Ruifen Zhang, Qiuyun Zhou, Lei Liu, Fei Huang, Yuanyuan Deng, Yongxuan Ma, Zhencheng Wei, Xiaojun Tang, and Mingwei Zhang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03791 • Publication Date (Web): 18 Oct 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 20, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 41

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) pulp phenolic extract

2

provides protection against alcoholic liver injury in mice by

3

alleviating intestinal microbiota dysbiosis, intestinal barrier

4

dysfunction and liver inflammation

5 6

Juan Xiao1, Ruifen Zhang1, Qiuyun Zhou2, Lei Liu1, Fei Huang1, Yuanyuan Deng1,

7

Yongxuan Ma1, Zhencheng Wei1, Xiaojun Tang1, Mingwei Zhang1*

8 9

1

Sericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural

10

Sciences/Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture/Guangdong

11

Key laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou 510610, China

12

2

13

Guangzhou 510631, China

Institute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, South China Normal University,

14 15

*

16

Tel: +86-20-8723 7865; Fax: +86-20-8723 6354; E-mail: [email protected]

Corresponding author: Mingwei Zhang

17 18

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

19 20

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

21

Abstract

22

Liver injury is the most common consequence of alcohol abuse, which is promoted by

23

the inflammatory response triggered by gut-derived endotoxins produced as a

24

consequence of intestinal microbiota dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction. The aim of

25

this study was to investigate whether modulation of intestinal microbiota and barrier

26

function, and liver inflammation contributes to the hepatoprotective effect of lychee

27

pulp phenolic extract (LPPE) in alcohol-fed mice. Mice were treated with an ethanol-

28

containing liquid diet alone or in combination with LPPE for 8 weeks. LPPE

29

supplementation alleviated ethanol-induced liver injury and downregulated key

30

markers of inflammation. Moreover, LPPE supplementation reversed the ethanol-

31

induced alteration of intestinal microbiota composition and increased the expression

32

of intestinal tight junction proteins, mucus protecting proteins and antimicrobial

33

proteins. Furthermore, in addition to decreasing serum endotoxin level, LPPE

34

supplementation suppressed CD14 and toll-like receptor 4 expression, and repressed

35

the activation of nuclear factor-κB p65 in the liver. These data suggest that intestinal

36

microbiota dysbiosis, intestinal barrier dysfunction and liver inflammation are

37

improved by LPPE, and therefore the intake of LPPE or Litchi pulp may be an

38

effective strategy to alleviate the susceptibility to alcohol-induced hepatic diseases.

39

Keywords: Alcoholic liver injury; Intestinal barrier; Inflammation; Lychee pulp;

40

Microbiota; Phenolics;

41 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 41

Page 3 of 41

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

42

Introduction

43

Alcohol abuse is an alarming public health concern. Alcohol-induced risks to health

44

in modern society bring an important financial burden for the health care system.1,2

45

Chronic alcohol consumption is associated with the development of various medical

46

disorders such as alcoholic liver disease, pancreatitis, and brain injury.2,3 Liver injury

47

is the most common consequence of alcohol abuse, which can progress to fatty liver,

48

steatohepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis and even liver cancer.1,3 According to the global

49

status report on alcohol and health by WHO, alcohol consumption causes

50

approximately 3.3 million deaths every year, which contributes to 5.9% of all

51

deaths.2The pathogenesis of liver injury induced by long-term alcohol consumption

52

appears to be complex and multifactorial. The inflammatory response induced by the

53

imbalance of the gut-liver axis plays an important role in the initiation and

54

development of alcoholic liver injury.4-6 Accumulating studies have revealed that

55

intestinal microbiota dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction are common in patients and

56

animals with alcohol-induced liver injury.5-8 Chronic alcohol consumption causes

57

intestinal microbiota dysbiosis, which results in the dysfunction of the intestinal

58

barrier and the translocation of bacteria and bacterial products.4-7 As bacterial

59

products, endotoxins are a critical trigger of liver inflammation.5,6 Endotoxins interact

60

with the endotoxin receptor CD14 and other receptors in the liver, followed by

61

cooperation with toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), and finally induce the activation of

62

nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB).5,6 NF-κB regulates the expression of inflammatory 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

63

factors, such as tumor necrosis factor-ߙ (TNF-ߙ), which in turn triggers liver

64

inflammation.5,10 Therefore, the endotoxin-TLR4-NF-κB pathway is a bridge linking

65

intestinal microbiota, intestinal barrier and liver inflammation. The prevention of

66

intestinal dysbiosis and liver inflammation effectively slows the progression of

67

alcoholic liver injury in animals.9-12

68

Lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) is a subtropical fruit that is cultivated throughout

69

Southeast Asia and has an attractive appearance, delicious taste and good nutritional

70

value.13 Recent studies have revealed that lychee pulp is rich in phenolic

71

compounds.14-17 Our previous studies have found that lychee pulp phenolic extract

72

(LPPE) confers a hepatoprotective effect on alcohol-induced liver injury,18,19 prevents

73

intestinal microbiota dysbiosis, and decreases serum endotoxin level,18 indicating that

74

LPPE may exert a hepatoprotective effect by reversing the imbalance of the gut-liver

75

axis in alcohol-fed animials. However, the protective effect of LPPE on the

76

inflammatory response triggered by gut-derived endotoxins produced as a

77

consequence of intestinal microbiota dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction remains

78

unknown. Intriguingly, procyanidin B2, rutin and (-)-epicatechin, three major

79

phenolic compositions in LPPE,18-20 have been demonstrated to exert anti-

80

inflammatory activity in animals.21-23 Therefore, the present study investigated the

81

mechanisms underlying the hepatoprotective effect of LPPE in C57BL/6 mice fed an

82

ethanol-containing liquid diet, focusing on the link between intestinal microbiota,

83

intestinal barrier, and hepatic inflammation. 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 41

Page 5 of 41

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

84

Materials and Methods

85

Preparation and analysis of LPPE. Fresh Lychee (cv. Feizixiao) was purchased

86

from a local fruit market in Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. LPPE was prepared

87

following our previous method.18,19 In our previous studies, the phenolic compositions

88

of LPPE were identified using HPLC-MS, and their contents were determined by

89

HPLC-DAD.19,20 Briefly, the major phenolic components in LPPE were procyanidin

90

B2 (104.98 ± 3.11 mg/g), (-)-epicatechin (34.91 ± 1.20 mg/g), quercetin 3-O-

91

rutinoside-7-O-a-L-rhamnosidase (260.49 ± 9.21 mg/g), rutin (54.06 ± 1.52 mg/g), and

92

isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (16.49 ± 0.50 mg/g).19 The content of A-type

93

procyanidin trimer, B-type procyanidin trimer and B-type procyanidin dimer

94

calculated as epicatechin equivalent (mg EE/g) using the standard curve of

95

epicatechin were 33.96 ± 0.96, 6.36 ± 0.21, and 4.56 ± 0.13 mg EE/g, respectively.19

96

The content of kaempferol rhamnosyl-rutinoside, rhamnetin rhamnosyl-rutinoside and

97

isorhamnetin rhamnosyl-rutinoside calculated as rutin equivalent (mg RE/g) using the

98

standard curve of rutin were 22.79 ± 0.45, 16.04 ± 0.56, and 26.76 ± 0.43 mg RE/g,

99

respectively.19

100

Animals and experimental design. The experimental procedures involving the use of

101

animals were approved by the Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee of Sun Yat-Sen

102

University (approval no. IACUC-DB-16-0302) and followed the Guiding Principles

103

in the Care and Use of Animals. Ten-week-old specific-pathogen-free male C57BL/6

104

mice (26 ± 2 g) were purchased from the Center of Laboratory Animal Science 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

105

Research of Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China). Animals were

106

housed in a specific-pathogen-free and environmentally controlled room with constant

107

temperature (22 ± 1 ºC), humidity (55-60%) and a 12-hour light-dark cycle.

108

During the one-week acclimation period, the mice were fed a rodent chow diet and

109

water ad libitum. The mice were then randomly divided into four groups (n = 10 per

110

group) and supplied a control liquid diet (control group, CON), a 4% (w/v) ethanol-

111

containing liquid diet (ethanol group, EtOH), a 4% (w/v) ethanol-containing liquid

112

diet supplemented with 0.2 g/L LPPE (low-dose LPPE-supplemented group,

113

EtOH+L-LPPE), or a 4% (w/v) ethanol-containing liquid diet supplemented with 0.4

114

g/L LPPE (high-dose LPPE-supplemented group, EtOH+H-LPPE) for 8 weeks. The

115

mice were housed two per cage. The liquid diet (TROPHIC Animal Feed High-Tech

116

Co. Ltd., Nantong, Jiangsu, China) provides 1 kcal/mL based on the Lieber–DeCarli

117

formulation, and 35% of the calories are provided from fat, 19% from carbohydrate,

118

18% from protein, and 28% from isocaloric maltose dextrin (control liquid diet) or

119

ethanol (4% (w/v) ethanol-containing liquid diet). The CON group was pair-fed with

120

the EtOH group, and the other groups were fed ad libitum. The diets were freshly

121

prepared from powder and provided daily at 5:00 p.m. Body weight and caloric intake

122

were recorded weekly and daily, respectively.

123

The animals were euthanized with ether inhalation after fasting for 12 h. Blood

124

samples were collected and centrifuged at 3000g for 10 min at 4 ºC to obtain serum.

125

After the mice were sacrificed, the livers were immediately removed, washed, 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 41

Page 7 of 41

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

126

weighed and cut into several portions. One portion was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde

127

immediately for histopathological analysis. The others were flash frozen in liquid

128

nitrogen. Faeces samples were immediately collected from the ileum and rectum, and

129

frozen in liquid nitrogen. The small intestines were immediately removed, washed

130

with chilled PBS, and frozen in liquid nitrogen. All samples were stored at −80°C.

131

Measurement of serum biomarkers of hepatic function. The activities of alanine

132

aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in the serum were

133

measured using the respective commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering

134

Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). All biochemical indices were determined using an

135

Infinite® M200 PRO plate reader (Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Salzburg-

136

Umgebung, Austria).

137

Measurement of lipid profiles in the serum and liver. The levels of triglyceride

138

(TG) and total cholesterol (TC) in the serum were measured using the respective

139

commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu,

140

China). For measurement of hepatic TG and TC levels, total lipids were extracted

141

from liver homogenates using a chloroform/methanol mixture (2:1, v/v),24 and TG and

142

TC levels in total lipids were measured using commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng

143

Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China).

144

Measurement of endotoxin and inflammatory factors levels in the serum. The

145

endotoxin level was determined using the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate test kit

146

(Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). Murine TNF7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

147

ߙ, interleukin-1ߚ (IL-1ߚ), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon-ߛ (IFN-ߛ) and monocyte

148

chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) were detected in the serum using a Bio-Plex Mouse

149

Cytokine 5-Plex Assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

150

Liver histopathology. Liver histopathology was assessed via hematoxylin and eosin

151

(H&E) staining following a standard procedure. Briefly, paraffin sections (5 µm-

152

thick) were cut, deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in an alcohol gradient, and

153

stained with H&E. Stained sections were observed using a light microscope (Leica

154

DMI 4000B, Heidelberger, Baden-Württemberg, Germany).

155

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Total RNA was extracted from the frozen

156

liver samples using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and reverse-

157

transcribed to synthesize cDNA on a B960 real-time thermocycler (Hangzhou Jingle

158

Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China) using a Reverse

159

Transcriptase M-MLV (RNase H-) (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu,

160

China). qRT-PCR was performed on an ABI ViiA 7 Detection System (Applied

161

Biosystems, Foster City, CA,USA) using an AceQ® qPCR SYBR® Green Master Mix

162

(Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). Each sample was assessed in

163

triplicate, and normalized to GAPDH or 18S. The relative gene expression levels were

164

calculated using the 2-△△CT method as previously described, and presented as a ratio

165

of the treatment group to the CON group.25 The primer sequences used (Sangon

166

Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) are listed in Table 1.

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 41

Page 9 of 41

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

167

Western blot analysis. Cytoplasmic protein extract, nuclear protein extract and

168

membrane protein extract from frozen liver were obtained by homogenizing the liver

169

in ice-cold extraction buffer for cytoplasmic protein, nuclear protein and membrane

170

protein, respectively, using the respective commercial kits (Beyotime Biotechnology,

171

Shanghai, China). Protein concentrations were determined by the BCA assay. Western

172

blot analysis was conducted as previously described.19 Briefly, the protein extract was

173

loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred onto a polyvinylidene

174

difluoride membrane (0.45 µm, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Hesse-Darmstadt,

175

Germany), and blocked with 5% skimmed milk, followed by immunostaining with

176

primary antibodies against CD14, TLR4, inhibitor kappa Bα (IκBα), phosphorylated-

177

IκBα (p-IκBα) or NF-κB p65 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA,

178

USA). After incubation with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody

179

(1:10000, Tianjin Sungene Biotech, Tianjin, China), immunoreactive proteins were

180

stained with ECL substrate from the Fast Western Blot Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL,

181

USA) and then exposed to a film. The film was scanned on a Plustek SW500 scanner

182

(Plustek, Taiwan, China), and the band intensities were subsequently recorded using

183

Quantity One 1-D analysis software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). β-actin, Histone

184

and ATP1B2 (Tianjin Sungene Biotech, Tianjin, China) were detected as the loading

185

controls for the cytoplasmic protein, nuclear protein and membrane protein extracts,

186

respectively.

9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

187

Measurement of faecal microbial composition by high-throughput sequencing

188

analysis. Total bacterial DNA was isolated from faeces using the PowerFecal™ DNA

189

Isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the

190

manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing and sequence analysis were conducted at

191

BGI-Shenzhen (Shenzhen, China) according to previously published methods.26

192

Briefly, the isolated DNA was subjected to Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the V4

193

hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene, followed by analysis of faecal microbiota

194

using QIIME 1.8.0.

195

Statistical analysis. Data were expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD) and

196

analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Duncan post hoc test using SPSS 16.0

197

software. For intestinal microbial composition analysis, data were expressed as the

198

means ± standard error (SE) and compared using Metastats. p < 0.05 was regarded as

199

statistical significance.

200

Results

201

Effects of LPPE on general parameters. As shown in Table 2, there were no

202

significant differences in the initial body weight, final body weight or total caloric

203

intake among the four groups (p > 0.05). Ethanol feeding resulted in a significant

204

increase in the liver-to-body weight ratio compared with the CON group (p < 0.05).

205

Both L-LPPE and H-LPPE supplementation significantly decreased the liver-to-body

206

weight ratio compared with the EtOH group, indicating that LPPE supplementation

207

alleviated ethanol-induced liver swelling. 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 41

Page 11 of 41

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

208

Effects of LPPE on liver histopathology. Ethanol feeding resulted in liver damage

209

— characterized by an irregular arrangement of hepatocytes, extensive fat droplets

210

and inflammatory infiltration in the hepatocytes — that was not seen in the CON

211

group (Fig. 1). The vacuoles in H&E-stained sections reflected the fat droplets in the

212

hepatocytes. Fewer and smaller fat droplets, and less inflammatory infiltration in the

213

hepatocytes were observed in the LPPE-supplemented groups than in the EtOH group.

214

The results indicated that LPPE supplementation alleviated ethanol-induced hepatic

215

steatosis and inflammation.

216

Effects of LPPE on serum biomarkers of hepatic function. As shown in Fig. 1,

217

ethanol intake led to significant increases in serum AST and ALT activities compared

218

with those in the CON group (1.37-fold and 1.36-fold, respectively, p < 0.05).

219

However, compared with the EtOH group, L-LPPE and H-LPPE supplementation

220

decreased serum AST activity by 27.23% and 36.24%, respectively, and decreased

221

serum ALT activity by 15.80% and 26.90%, respectively (p < 0.05). The results

222

indicated that LPPE supplementation alleviated ethanol-induced liver injury.

223

Effects of LPPE on serum and liver lipid profiles. Ethanol feeding led to significant

224

increases in serum and hepatic TG levels (1.26-fold and 1.46-fold, respectively, p