Magnetically Triggered Release From Giant Unilamellar Vesicles

Purchase temporary access to this content. ACS Members purchase additional access options · Ask your library to provide you and your colleagues site-w...
2 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
LETTER pubs.acs.org/JPCL

Magnetically Triggered Release From Giant Unilamellar Vesicles: Visualization By Means Of Confocal Microscopy Silvia Nappini,† Tamer Al Kayal,† Debora Berti,† Bengt Norden,‡ and Piero Baglioni*,† † ‡

Department of Chemistry & CSGI, University of Florence, Via della Lastruccia 3 - Sesto Fiorentino, 50019 Florence, Italy Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringPhysical Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden

bS Supporting Information ABSTRACT: Magnetically triggered release from magnetic giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) loaded with Alexa fluorescent dye was studied by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) under a lowfrequency alternating magnetic field (LF-AMF). Core/shell cobalt ferrite nanoparticles coated with rhodamine B isothiocyanate (MP@SiO2(RITC)) were prepared and adsorbed on the GUV membrane. The MP@SiO2(RITC) location and distribution on giant lipid vesicles were determined by 3D-CLSM projections, and their effect on the release properties and GUV permeability under a LF-AMF was investigated by CLSM timeresolved experiments. We show that the mechanism of release of the fluorescent dye during the LF-AMF exposure is induced by magnetic nanoparticle energy and mechanical vibration, which promote the perturbation of the GUV membrane without its collapse. SECTION: Nanoparticles and Nanostructures

T

he ability to achieve spatial and temporal control over drug release from artificially designed drug carriers is one of the core challenges in biomedical research.13 The most common methods to favor drug leakage from vectors (polymeric or polyelectrolyte microcapsules and liposomes) are based on the destabilization of the system induced by an external stimulus such as pH change,4 temperature increase (hyperthemia),58 ultrasound application,9,10 ionic strength variations,11,12 enzymatic digestion,13,14 or reductive intracellular environment.15 Lipid vesicles, since their discovery, have attracted growing interest for their potential application as drug delivery16,17 vehicles, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents,18,19 and primitive models for cellular membrane permeability investigation.2022 Their main advantages in comparison with other well-studied systems, such as polyelectrolyte microcapsules,2325 are mainly related to a high biocompatibility, flexibility in terms of size and composition, the easy modification of surface properties, and their ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic molecules26 into the aqueous pool or hydrophobic molecules within the lipid bilayer.27 Thanks to their submicrometer diameter, large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs or liposomes) are commonly used for in vivo applications, while giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs), with a diameter ranging between 1 and100 μm but with identical local arrangement of lipid bilayers, can be used as models28 to visualize with optical microscopic techniques the membrane perturbations occurring after the application of an external stimulus.2931 The responsive agents are magnetic particles, which can be easily encapsulated inside of lipid vesicles and steer their r 2011 American Chemical Society

host to specific locations of the body under an external magnetic force.21,32 Once the drug carrier has reached the specific target, an alternating magnetic field (AMF) can be applied to trigger the drug leakage.6,17,33 A number of reports in the literature address the investigation of drug release under an alternating magnetic field; in most cases, a high-frequency magnetic field (HF-AMF), 10500 kHz, was used to promote local heating.8,17,23,34 However, a low-frequency alternating magnetic field (LF-AMF), with oscillating frequencies < 10 kHz, is generally preferred for in vivo applications, and the hyperthermic effect is minimized. In previous works,35,36 we have studied how magnetoliposomes (liposomes loaded with cobalt ferrite nanoparticles) release a fluorescent molecule entrapped in the aqueous pool upon exposure to LF-AMF. The release behavior of the dye has been studied as a function of different parameters, that is, field frequency, exposure time, and magnetic fluid concentration, showing that either hyperthermic effect or nanoparticle motions, both driven by LF-AMF, alter the bilayer structure, promoting the drug release. However, mechanistic insight into the perturbations locally acting on the bilayer cannot be obtained with the previous investigation. In this study, we gain further structural details on the interaction of magnetic nanoparticles with their liposomal host and on the release process through CLSM visualization of the carriers Received: January 20, 2011 Accepted: March 1, 2011 Published: March 10, 2011 713

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz2000936 | J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 713–718

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

LETTER

during and after the application of the external stimulus. The use of micrometer-sized magnetic GUVs allows a direct observation of the location of magnetic nanoparticles in the lipid vesicle and thus provides a better understanding of the permeation properties of lipid bilayers in the presence of an external magnetic field of 200 Hz. The use of magnetic and fluorescent particles encapsulated in GUVs is a well-suited system for locating their position, and the use of a fluorescent dye entrapped in the internal lumen of the vesicle as a mimic of a drug enclosed in the aqueous pool of a liposome allows study of the release process through CLSM acquisition.3739 Moreover, magnetic GUVs can be used as models to study shape deformation and membrane perturbation when a magnetic field is applied.37 Recently, GUVs loaded with fluorescent maghemite nanoparticles tagged with rhodamine B were used to study vesicle deformations in the presence of a static magnetic force at different salt concentrations, evidencing an important elongation of GUVs and a fluorescence intensity increase at higher salt concentration in the rhodamine magnetic fluid.12,37,40 The aim of the present work is to detect the location and distribution of fluorescent superparamagnetic particles in magnetic GUVs and to study the effect of a LF-AMF on the permeability of magnetic vesicles. For the first time, to the best of our knowledge, we report a detailed CLSM investigation on magnetic particles' location in GUVs and a study of controlled drug release from magnetic fluorescent vesicles upon LF-AMF exposure. Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles incorporating rhodamine B isothiocyanate MP@SiO2(RITC) were synthesized by a solgel method4143 in order to allow for their observation by fluorescence and confocal microscopy. Magnetic GUVs were prepared using the electroformation method44 by means of a homemade conducting chamber (see the procedure in Supporting Information, Figure S1) in the presence of MP@SiO2(RITC). Drug release experiments were carried out by CLSM time series acquisition, measuring the varation in fluorescence emission of Alexa 488-C5-maleimide dye loaded in the aqueous pool of GUVs, in order to check the vesicle permeability changes or their structural deformations during and after the LF-AMF exposure. MP@SiO2(RITC) was prepared by a solgel method (see Supporting Information), introducing some modifications to the standard procedure.41 Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles were first prepared according to the Massart45,46 method, introducing minor modifications as previously reported,35,47,48 and then, APTESRITC, aminopropyltriethoxysilane covalently coupled to the fluorescent dye rhodamine B,49 was added to the magnetic fluid to have a fluorescent coating of nanoparticles. The growth of APTES-RITC shells on a cobalt ferrite NP involved the hydrolysis of TEOS and the condensation of silica on cobalt ferrite cores. Cobalt and iron contents in MP@SiO2(RITC) were checked by an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES), indicating 950 and 1920 mg/mL of Co and Fe, respectively. MP@SiO2(RITC) particles were observed with an inverted optical microscope (Nikon Diaphot 300) and with a DMIRE2 confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, Leica TCS SP2). Microscopy images of MP@SiO2(RITC) are reported in Supporting Information (Figure S4), evidencing the presence of fluorescent microstructures resulting from the aggregation of smaller primary particles, which easily align in a given direction because of magnetic anisotropy effects. MP@SiO2(RITC) particles were also characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements. The size distribution of the particles extracted

from CONTIN analysis indicates the presence of three different populations (see Supporting Information, Figure S5). In particular, the number-weighted size distribution highlights the presence of a dominant population of 50 nm nanoparticles and the occurrence of some larger aggregates of about 180 and 350 nm of diameter, as shown in Figure S5(b) in Supporting Information. The fluorescence emission spectra of MP@SiO2(RITC) were compared to those obtained for an identical concentration of APTES-RITC aqueous solution, excited at λ = 546 nm (corresponding to the maximum fluorescence emission) and λ = 514 nm (corresponding to the laser line used for confocal microcopy acquisition), indicating a red shift for MP@SiO2(RITC) due to the interaction of the dye with cobalt ferrite particles or inclusion of the dye in the silica shell of the particles with respect to noninteracting dye molecules in solution. The fluorescence intensity of MP@SiO2(RITC) was at least twice lower than that for free APTES-RITC (see Supporting Information, Figure S6). The differences in fluorescence emission for MP@SiO2(RITC) and APTES-RITC aqueous solutions indicates that APTES-RITC dye is effectively bound to magnetic particles. Magnetic GUVs, prepared by the electroformation method,44 have diameters that range from 10 to 50 μm, and their images were acquired by CLSM using a water immersion objective 63/ 1.2 W (Zeiss). The water-soluble probe Alexa 488-maleimide was excited at λ = 488 nm and detected between 525 and 540 nm by the first detector (PMT1), while MP@SiO2(RITC) particles were excited at λ = 514 nm and detected between 560 and 650 nm by a second detector (PMT2). All leakage experiments were quantitatively analyzed by measuring the change in fluorescence intensity of the probe in the aqueous pool inside of the GUVs during the exposure to a LF-AMF generated by a broken ferrite ring carrying a solenoid through which an alternating electric current (AC) from a tone generator was delivered.36 For the application of a LF-AMF, the samples were placed in the middle of the gap in 1 cm cylindrical quartz cells. Due to the design of the experimental apparatus, the magnetic field inside of the cell is not isotropic. As a consequence, the sample undergoes magnetic field gradients that cannot be avoided (see Supporting Information, Figures S2 and S3). CLSM images of magnetic GUVs prepared in the presence of MP@SiO2(RITC) are reported in Figure 1. The localization of the magnetic particles onto the bilayer membrane results in the staining of the bilayer itself, showing that most particles are adsorbed on the surface of GUVs’bilayer. Three-dimensional projection obtained by assembling with Leica software confocal slices (thickness 0.366 μm) of magnetic GUVs indicates that generally, MP@SiO2(RITC) particles are not homogeneously distributed on the membrane surface of the vesicles (Figure 2) but rather tend to concentrate in magnetic patches. Intensity line profiles of different regions of the GUV membrane (see Supporting Information, Figure S7) confirm that the magnetic nanoparticles are not evenly distributed on the lipid bilayer of vesicles, evidencing larger profiles (ranging between 1 and 4 μm) and higher fluorescent intensities where MP@SiO2(RITC) particles are adsorbed. Moreover, confocal xyλ-scans of magnetic GUVs were performed to analyze the fluorescence spectra in different regions of the membrane, depending on MP@SiO2(RITC) adsorption, evidencing higher fluorescent intensity (maximum emission around λ = 586 nm) in the 714

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz2000936 |J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 713–718

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

LETTER

Figure 1. CLSM images of magnetic GUVs prepared by electroformation in the presence of MP@SiO2(RITC).

The leakage behavior was studied by means of CLSM, loading GUVs with the water-soluble fluorophore Alexa 488-C5-maleimide. To detect the vesicle permeability changes under LF-AMF, magnetic GUVs in the presence of MP@SiO2(RITC) and control samples (GUVs without magnetic particles) were analyzed by measuring the change in fluorescence intensity of the Alexa dye located inside of the GUVs. Time series scans were carried out before, during (15 min), and after (15 min) the LFAMF application at 200 Hz of oscillating field frequency. Alexa-loaded GUV (without magnetic particles) acquisitions indicated no changes in the fluorescence intensity over time. Therefore, we can exclude any leakage mechanisms due to the LF-AMF exposure of nonmagnetic GUVs and any photobleaching effects of the Alexa dye.36 On the other hand, Alexa-loaded GUVs in the presence of MP@SiO2(RITC) showed a pronunced release of the dye, monitored as a decrease of fluorescence emission, due to the LF-AMF exposure, as reported in the time series pictures in Figure 3. During the LF-AMF application, we observed a progressive reduction of the fluorescent intensity of Alexa inside of the vesicles, and this trend proceeded even after field removal as a consequence of an increased Alexa diffusion through the vesicles membrane. It is interesting to note that even if the distribution of MP@SiO2(RITC) onto the membrane is not homogeneous, the Alexa dye leakage from the GUVs is uniform, evidencing no preferential paths in the membrane. Release curves of Alexa dye from magnetic and nonmagnetic GUVs are shown in Figure 4, where the relative fluorescence intensity, calculated as the ratio between the measured fluorescence intensity at time t and the fluorescence intensity of the untreated sample at time zero, were monitored over time. Magnetic GUV samples exposed to the field have shown a strong decrease (around 50%) of the fluorescence intensity during the experiments. Therefore, the permeability of GUVs, negligible in the absence of LF-AMF, strongly increased after the field exposure. These results indicate that the application of a LF-AMF induces an alteration of the lipid bilayer structure (promoting the formation of pores) that enhances the Alexa release, without the rupture of the vesicles. This behavior is similar to what we have previously reported for uncoated and citrate-coated nanoparticles36 loaded in the aqueous pool of lipid vesicles. In order to better understand the mechanism involved in the Alexa leakage, the release kinetics, reported as a decrease of the normalized fluorescence intensity of the dye inside of GUVs over

Figure 2. Three-dimensional projection (max fix treatment) of magnetic GUVs prepared by electroformation in the presence of MP@SiO2(RITC).

presence of larger amounts of adsorbed nanoparticles (see Supporting Information, Figure S9). These results were compared to the ones obtained with GUVs hydrated with a solution with an identical concentration of APTES-RITC. Differently from magnetic GUVs, RITC-labeled GUVs images show a uniform distribution of the fluorescent dye on the lipid bilayer of vesicles, evidencing the same membrane thickness (around 0.5 μm, close to the instrumental resolution limit) over the entire surface of GUVs (see Intensity line profiles in Supporting Information, Figure S8). Confocal xyλ-scans of RITC-labeled GUVs (reported in the Supporting Information, Figure S10) showed a fluorescence emission spectrum centered around λem = 576 nm, confirming that the red-shift effect observed by spectrofluorimetric analysis of MP@SiO2(RITC) aqueous solution is also present for MP@SiO2(RITC)-adsorbed GUVs (λem = 586 nm). Empty and nonfluorescent GUVs were mixed to MP@SiO2(RITC) in the ratio [CoFe2O4]/[lipid] = 2 and analyzed by CLSM in order to detect the effect of the external addition of magnetic particles to preformed GUVs. Confocal images reported in the Supporting Materials (Figure S11) show the adsortpion of fluorescent MP@SiO2 particles on the bilayer, whose results are visible to confocal microscopy, and the occurrence of large aggregates of magnetic particles, whose presence induces shape deformations in nearby vesicles. 715

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz2000936 |J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 713–718

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

LETTER

Figure 3. CLSM images of Alexa-loaded GUVs over time. In the first line, Alexa is colored in green, and MP@SiO2(RITC) is in red: magnetic GUV (a) in the absence of AMF at time zero, (b) exposed for 15 min to 200 Hz AMF, and (c) 15 min after the field application. Magnetic GUV again exposed to 200 Hz AMF for (d) 15 min and (e) 15 min after the last field application. In the second line are CLSM pictures obtained by removing the nanoparticle fluorescent contribution from the first line pictures.

Figure 4. Alexa release profiles from GUVs decorated (a) and not decorated (b) with MP@SiO2(RITC) during and after LF-AMF applications.

Figure 5. Alexa release kinetics from GUVs decorated with MP@SiO2(RITC) exposed to LF-AMF. The solid curve is the fitting obtained by means of eq 1.

time, was studied by the Ritger and Peppas equation.5053 The Ritger and Peppas equation is widely used to analyze the release behavior of various drug delivery systems5456 and can be written as ðIð0Þ  IðtÞÞ ¼ Kt n Ið¥Þ

erosion contribute to the overall release mechanism (“anomalous transport”). The experimental curve and the corresponding fitting obtained with magnetic GUVs exposed to the LF-AMF are reported in Figure 5. The curve is well-fitted by eq 1 for n equal to 0.67 ( 0.01, indicating an anomalous transport mechanism of release; that is the combination of Fickian diffusion and membrane perturbation of GUV. This kinetics of release suggests an alteration of the lipid bilayer structure followed by the formation of pores promoting the fluorescent dye leakage. Moreover, a kinetic constant, K, of (2.37 ( 0.31)  103 indicates a high rate of release, which confirms the drug leakage through formation of pores. In summary, magnetic and fluorescent GUVs decorated with MP@SiO2(RITC) were successfully prepared, evidencing a

ð1Þ

where [I(0)  I(t)]/I(¥) is the drug fraction release at time t, K is the kinetic constant, and n is the diffusion exponent that can be related to the drug transport mechanism. The power law equation can be seen as the superposition of Fickian diffusion and zero-order kinetics; when the n value is near 0.5, Fickian diffusion control is indicated, while an n value of near 1.0 indicates erosion or relaxation control, which lead to a zero-order release (“case II transport”). Intermediate n values between 0.5 and 1.0 suggest that diffusion and 716

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz2000936 |J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 713–718

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

LETTER

nonhomogeneous adsorption of magnetic nanoparticles on the membrane of the vesicles. The effect of a LF-AMF on the release properties and GUVs' permeability was investigated by acquisition of CLSM images over time, evidencing a progressive reduction of Alexa fluorescent intensity. The experimental results have indicated an increase of Alexa leakage through the vesicle membrane as a consequence of the formation of pores induced by LF-AMF exposure. The system exposed to the LF-AMF follows an anomalous transport mechanism of release. The equipment that we have set up for the acquisition of CLSM time series images during the application of a LF-AMF and the successful preparation of magnetic and fluorescent GUVs open the opportunity for the real observation of membrane perturbations due to an external stimulus and the possibility to gain understanding of the drug release mechanism. For biomedical applications in drug delivery, the size of the vesicles and particles could be decreased and easily visualized and located by MRI or optical imaging without the requirement of invasive methods.

Magnetoliposomes Induced by an Elctromagnetic Field. J. Controlled Release 1997, 46, 263–271. (7) Ito, A.; Kuga, Y.; Honda, H.; Kikkawa, H.; Horiuschi, A.; Watanabe, Y.; Kobayashi, T. Magnetite Nanoparticle-Loaded AntiHER2 Immunoliposomes for Combination of Antibody Therapy with Hyperthermia. Cancer Lett. 2004, 212, 167–175. (8) Hsu, M.-H.; Su, Y.-C. Iron-Oxide Embedded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Magnetically Controlled Heating and Drug Delivery. Biomed. Microdevices 2008, 10, 785–793. (9) Lin, H.-Y.; Thomas, J. L. PEG-Lipids and Oligo(ethilene glycol) Surfactants Enhance the Ultrasonic Permeabilizability of Liposomes. Langmuir 2003, 19, 1098–1105. (10) Schroeder, A.; Avnir, Y.; Weisman, S.; Najajreh, Y.; Gabizon, A.; Talmon, Y.; Kost, J.; Barenholz, Y. Controlling Liposomal Drug Release with Low Frequency Ultrasound: Mechanism and Feasibility. Langmuir 2007, 23, 4019–4025. (11) Menager, C.; Cabuil, V. Reversible Shrinkage of Giant Magnetoliposomes under an Osmotic Stress. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7913–7918. (12) Beaune, G.; Menager, C. In Situ Precipitation of Magnetic Fluid Encapsulated in Giant Liposomes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 343, 396–399. (13) Borodina, T.; Markvicheva, E.; Kunizhev, S.; Moehwald, H.; Sukhorukov, G. B.; Kreft, O. Controlled Release of DNA from SelfDegrading Microcapsules. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 1894–1899. (14) Itoh, Y.; Matsusaki, M.; Kida, T.; Akashi, M. Locally Controlled Release of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor from Multilayered Capsules. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 2202–2206. (15) Haynie, D. T.; Palath, N.; Liu, Y.; Li, B. Y.; Pargaonkar, N. Biomimetic Nanostructured Materials: Inherent Reversible Stabilization of Polypeptide Microcapsules. Langmuir 2005, 21, 1136–1138. (16) Babincova, M.; Sourivong, P.; Chorvat, D.; Babinec, P. Laser Triggered Drug Release from Magnetoliposomes. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999, 194, 163–166. (17) Babincova, M.; Cicmanec, P.; Altanerova, V.; Altaner, C.; Babinec, P. AC-Magnetic Field Controlled Drug Release from Magnetoliposomes: Design of a Method for Site-Specific Chemotherapy. Bioelectrochemistry 2002, 55, 17–19. (18) Martina, M.-S.; Fortin, J.-P.; Menager, C.; Clement, O.; Barratt, G.; Grabielle-Madelmont, C.; Gazeau, F.; Cabuil, V.; Lesieur, S. Generation of Superparamagneticliposomes Revealed As Highly Efficient MRI Contrast Agents for In Vivo Imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10676–10685. (19) Bulte, J. W.; Zhang, S.; Van Gelderen, P.; Duncan, I. D.; Frank, J. A. MR Tracking of Magnetically Labeled Glial Cells. Radiology 1999, 213P, 225–225. (20) Sandre, O.; Menager, C.; Prost, J.; Cabuil, V.; Bacri, J. C.; Cebers, A. Shape Transitions of Giant Liposomes Induced by an Anisotropic Spontaneous Curvature. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 3865–3870. (21) Lesieur, S.; Grabielle-Madelmont, C.; Menager, C.; Cabuil, V.; Dadhi, D.; Pierrot, P.; Edwards, K. Evidence of Surfactant-Induced Formation of Transient Pores in Lipid Bilayers by Using MagneticFluid-Loaded Liposomes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5266–5267. (22) Hamada, T.; Miura, Y.; Ishii, K. I.; Araki, S.; Yoshikawa, K.; Vestergaard, M.; Takagi, M. Dynamic Processes in Endocytic Transformation of a Raft-Exhibiting Giant Liposome. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 10853–10857. (23) Hu, S. H.; Tsai, C. H.; Liao, C. F.; Liu, D. M.; Chen, S. Y. Controlled Rupture of Magnetic Polyelectrolyte Microcapsules for Drug Delivery. Langmuir 2008, 24, 11811–11818. (24) Shen, J. F.; Hu, Y. Z.; Qin, C.; Ye, M. X. Layer-by-Layer SelfAssembly of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Polyelectrolytes Prepared by in Situ Radical Polymerization. Langmuir 2008, 24, 3993–3997. (25) Antipov, A. A.; Sukhorukov, G. B.; Donath, E.; Mohwald, H. Sustained Release Properties of Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Capsules. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 2281–2284. (26) Al-Jamal, W. T.; Al-Jamal, K. T.; Bomans, P. H.; Frederik, P. M.; Kostarelos, K. Functionalized-Quantum-Dot-Liposomes Hybrids As Multimodal Nanoparticles for Cancer. SMALL 2008, 4, 1406–1415.

’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT

bS

Supporting Information. Experimental procedure of MP@SiO2(RITC) synthesis and GUV preparation by electroformation chamber, LF-AMF setup, MP@SiO2(RITC) characterization (microscopy images, DLS size distribution, and fluorescent spectra), intensity line profiles and fluorescent spectra of the magnetic GUV membrane, and CLSM images of empty GUVs mixed to MP@SiO2(RITC). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

’ AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author

*Fax: þ39 055 4573032. Tel: þ39 055 4573033. E-mail: [email protected]fi.it.

’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT Financial support from CSGI, MIUR-PRIN (2008-20087K9A2J), and FIRB (RBPR05JH2P ITALNANONET) is acknowledged. B.N. acknowledges a King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Award making this project possible. Dr. Tore Eriksson is acknowledged for building the alternating magnetic field generator. ’ REFERENCES (1) Woodle, M. C. Sterically Stabilized Liposome Therapeutics. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1995, 16, 249–265. (2) Allen, T. M.; Cullis, P. R. Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream. Science 2004, 303, 1818–1821. (3) Torchilin, V. P. Recent Advances with Lipososmes As Pharamceutical Carriers. Nat. Rev. 2005, 4, 145–160. (4) Mills, J. K.; Eichenbaum, N.; Case, N.; Needham, D. Effect of Bilayer Cholesterol and Surface Grafted Poly(ethylene glycol) on PhInduced Release of Contents from Liposomes by Poly(2-ethylacrylic acid). J. Liposome Res. 1999, 9, 275–290. (5) Needham, D.; Dewhirstb, M. W. The Development and Testing of a New Temperature-Sensitive Drug Delivery System for the Treatment of Solid Tumors. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 53, 285–305. (6) Viroonchatapan, E.; Sato, H.; Ueno, M.; Adachi, I.; Tazawa, K.; Horikoshi, I. Release of 5-Fluorouracil from Thermosensitive 717

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz2000936 |J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 713–718

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

LETTER

(47) Bonini, M.; Wiedenmann, A.; Baglioni, P. Small Angle Polarizes Neutrons (SANSPOL) Investigation of Surfactant Free Magnetic Fluid of Uncoated and Silica Coated Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 14901–14906. (48) Bonini, M.; Wiedenmann, A.; Baglioni, P. Synthesis and Characterization of Surfactant and Silica-Coated Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles. Physica A 2004, 339, 86–91. (49) Verhaegh, N. A. M.; Vanblaaderen, A. Dispersions of Rhodamine-Labeled Silica Spheres — Synthesis, Characterization, and Fluorescence Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy. Langmuir 1994, 10, 1427–1438. (50) Arifin, D. Y.; Lee, L. Y.; Wang, C.-H. Mathematical Modeling and Simulation of Drug Release from Microspheres: Implications to Drug Delivery Systems. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2006, 58, 1274–1325. (51) Serra, J.; Domenech, J.; Peppas, N. A. Drug Transport Mechanisms and Release Kinetics from Molecularly Designed Poly(acrylic acidg-ethylene gycol) Hydrogels. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 5440–5451. (52) Ritger, P. L.; Peppas, N. A. A simple equation for description of solute release. II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. J. Controlled Release 1987, 5, 37–42. (53) Ritger, P. L.; Peppas, N. A. A Simple Equation for Description of Solute Release. I. Fickian and Non-Fickian Release from NonSwellable Devices in the Form of Slabs, Spheres, Cylinders or Discs. J. Controlled Release 1987, 5, 23–36. (54) Velasco, M. V.; Ford, J. L.; Rowe, P.; Rajabi-Siahboomi, A. R. Influence of Drug: Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose Ratio, Drug and Polymer Particle Size and Compression Force on the Release of Diclofenac Sodium from HPMC Tablets. J. Controlled Release 1999, 57, 75–85. (55) Sadeghi, F.; Ford, J. L.; Rubinstein, M. H.; Rajabi-Siahboomi, A. R. Study of Drug Release from Pellets Coated with Surelease Containing Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2001, 27, 419–430. (56) Sadeghi, F.; Ford, J. L.; Rubinstein, M. H.; Rajabi-Siahboomi, A. R. Comparative Study of Drug Release from Pellets Coated with HPMC or Surelease. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2000, 26, 651–660.

(27) Kloepfer, J. A.; Cohen, N.; Nadeau, J. L. FRET between CdSe Quantum Dots in Lipid Vesicles and Water- and Lipid-Soluble Dyes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 17042–17048. (28) Bucher, P.; Fischer, A.; Luisi, P. L.; Oberholzer, T.; Walde, P. Giant Vesicles As Biochemical Compartments: The Use of Microinjection Techniques. Langmuir 1998, 14, 2712–2721. (29) Tamba, Y.; Yamazaki, M. Single Giant Unilamellar Vesicle Method Reveals Effect of Antimicrobial Peptide Magainin 2 on Membrane Permeability. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 15823–15833. (30) Inaoka, Y.; Yamazaki, M. Vesicle Fission of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles of Liquid-Ordered-Phase Membranes Induced by Amphiphiles with a Single Long Hydrocarbon Chain. Langmuir 2007, 23, 720–728. (31) Menager, C.; Guemghar, D.; Perzynski, R.; Lesieur, S.; Cabuil, V. Lipid Bilayer Elasticity Measurements in Giant Liposomes in Contact with a Solubilizing Surfactant. Langmuir 2008, 24, 4968–4974. (32) Laurent, S.; Forge, D.; Port, M.; Roch, A.; Robic, C.; Elst, L. V.; Muller, R. N. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Vectorization, Physicochemical Characterizations, and Biological Applications. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2064–2110. (33) Hu, S.-H.; Liu, T.-H.; Huang, H.-Y.; Liu, D.-M.; Chen, S.-Y. Magnetic-Sensitive Silica Nanospheres for Controlled Drug Release. Langmuir 2008, 24, 239–244. (34) Liu, T. Y.; Hu, S. H.; Liu, K. H.; Shaiu, R. S.; Liu, D. M.; Chen, S. Y. Instantaneous Drug Delivery of Magnetic/Thermally Sensitive Nanospheres by a High-Frequency Magnetic Field. Langmuir 2008, 24, 13306–13311. (35) Nappini, S.; Bombelli, F. B.; Bonini, M.; Norden, B.; Baglioni, P. Magnetoliposomes for Controlled Drug Release in the Presence of LowFrequency Magnetic Field. Soft Matter 2010, 6, 154–162. (36) Nappini, S. B., M.; Baldelli Bombelli, F.; Pineider, F.; Sangregorio, C.; Baglioni, P.; Norden, B. Controlled Drug Release under a Low Frequency Magnetic Field: Effect of the Citrate Coating on Magnetoliposome Stability. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 1025–1037. (37) Beaune, G.; Dubertret, B.; Clement, O.; Vayssettes, C.; Cabuil, V.; Menager, C. Giant Vesicles Containing Magnetic Nanoparticles and Quantum Dots: Feasibility and Tracking by Fiber Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5421– 5424. (38) Bertorelle, F.; Wihelm, C.; Roger, J.; Gazeau, F.; Menager, C.; Cabuil, V. Fluorescent-Modified Superparamegnetic Naoparticles: Intracellular Uptake and Use in Cellular Imaging. Langmuir 2006, 22, 5385–5391. (39) Riviere, C.; Martina, M. S.; Tomita, Y.; Wilhelm, C.; Dinh, A. T.; Menager, C.; Pinard, E.; Lesieur, S.; Gazeau, F.; Seylaz, J. Magnetic Targeting of Nanometric Magnetic Fluid Loaded Liposomes to Specific Brain Intravascular Areas: A Dynamic Imaging Study in Mice. Radiology 2007, 244, 439–448. (40) Beaune, G.; Menager, C.; Cabuil, V. Location of Magnetic and Fluorescent Nanoparticles Encapsulated Inside Giant Liposomes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 7424–7429. (41) Lu, Y.; Yin, Y. D.; Mayers, B. T.; Xia, Y. N. Modifying the Surface Properties of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles through a SolGel Approach. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 183–186. (42) Park, K. S.; Tae, J.; Choi, B.; Kim, Y. S.; Moon, C.; Kim, S. H.; Lee, H. S.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Park, J.; Lee, J. H.; Lee, J. E.; Joh, J. W.; Kim, S. Characterization, in Vitro Cytotoxicity Assessment, and in Vivo Visualization of Multimodal, RITC-Labeled, Silica-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles for Labeling Human Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2010, 6, 263–276. (43) Abou-Hassan, A.; Bazzi, R.; Cabuil, V. Multistep ContinuousFlow Microsynthesis of Magnetic and Fluorescent γ-Fe2O3@SiO2 Core/Shell Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7180–7183. (44) Angelova, M. I.; Soleau, S.; Meleard, P.; Faucon, J. F.; Bothorel, P. Preparation of Giant Vesicles by External Ac Electric-Fields — Kinetics and Applications. Prog. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1992, 89, 127–131. (45) Massart, C. R. Preparation of Aqueous Magnetic Liquids in Alkaline and Acidic Media. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1981, 17, 1247–1248. (46) Massart, C. R. C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. C 1980, 291, 1–3. 718

dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz2000936 |J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 713–718