Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV
Article
Metabolic Changes during Storage of Brassica napus Seeds under Moist Conditions and Consequences for the Sensory Quality of the Resulting Virgin Oil Anja Bonte, Rabea Schweiger, Caroline Pons, Claudia Wagner, Ludger Brühl, Bertrand Matthäus, and Caroline Müller J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04149 • Publication Date (Web): 05 Dec 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 11, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Metabolic Changes during Storage of Brassica napus Seeds under Moist Conditions and Consequences for the Sensory Quality of the Resulting Virgin Oil
Anja Bonte1,#, Rabea Schweiger2,#,*, Caroline Pons2, Claudia Wagner3, Ludger Brühl1, Bertrand Matthäus1, and Caroline Müller2
1
Department of Safety and Quality of Cereals, Max Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Schützenberg 12, 32756 Detmold, Germany 2
Department of Chemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
3
Institute of Food Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstr. 45, 48149 Münster, Germany #
Both authors contributed equally
*Author for correspondence: Rabea Schweiger,
[email protected], Phone: +49521-1065636
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1 2
Page 2 of 46
ABSTRACT Virgin rapeseed (Brassica napus) oil is a valuable niche product, if delivered in high
3
quality. In this study, the effects of moist storage of B. napus seeds for one to four days
4
on the seed metabolome and the chemo-sensory properties of the produced oils were
5
determined. The concentrations of several primary metabolites including
6
monosaccharides and amino acids rapidly increased in the seeds, probably indicating
7
the breakdown of storage compounds to support seed germination. Seed
8
concentrations of indole glucosinolates increased with a slight time offset suggesting
9
that amino acids may be used to modify secondary metabolism. The volatile profiles of
10
the oils were pronouncedly influenced by moist seed storage, with the sensory quality of
11
the oils decreasing. This study provides a direct time-resolved link between seed
12
metabolism under moist conditions and the quality of the resulting oils, thereby
13
emphasizing the crucial role of dry seed storage to ensure high oil quality.
14 15
KEYWORDS
16
Brassica napus, seed, storage conditions, glucosinolates, oil, sensory quality
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 46
17
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
INTRODUCTION Vegetable, edible oils are produced from several domestic crops with high seed oil
18 19
contents. These oils are important components of human nutrition, as they deliver
20
energy, improve the aroma of foods and are healthy due to high proportions of essential
21
unsaturated fatty acids in the triglycerides.1 Vegetable oils are classified according to
22
the plant species of origin and processing steps during oil production. Virgin vegetable
23
oils are produced by cold-pressing of seeds under mild conditions followed by
24
sedimentation or filtration of the oil, without further treatments of the seeds or the oil
25
(reviewed by Matthäus and Brühl2). By using such a gentle processing, nutritive and
26
healthy ingredients are retained and the oils have a more intense color, taste, and odor
27
compared to refined oils. However, studies are lacking that link metabolic processes in
28
the seeds with chemo-sensory properties of the corresponding oils, when seeds are
29
stored improperly. Virgin rapeseed (Brassica napus) oil is a valuable niche product on the European
30 31
market, as it contains high proportions of unsaturated fatty acids and further bioactive,
32
health-promoting compounds including vitamins, tocopherols, phenols, and flavonoids.3-
33
5
34
fresh rapeseed, accompanied by a nutty after-taste.6 Brassica napus belongs to the
35
family Brassicaceae. Members of this taxon often contain erucic acid and glucosinolates
36
as prominent secondary plant compounds. Erucic acid is bitter and can cause heart
37
disease in animals and glucosinolates turn the seed cake (i. e., the protein-rich material
38
remaining after oil pressing) less useable as animal fodder. Therefore, today rapeseed
39
varieties with low erucic acid and glucosinolate concentrations (i. e., double-
It has a pleasant, characteristic mild aroma described with attributes like green, or
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
40
zero/double-low varieties) are used for the production of edible rapeseed oil. However,
41
glucosinolates are low in concentrations but not absent in these varieties. The sulfur-
42
containing glucosinolates and their volatile hydrolysis products are responsible for the
43
characteristic taste and odor of Brassicaceae crops, respectively.7-9 The volatile profile
44
of high-quality virgin rapeseed oil is well characterized with its typical smell being
45
formed by a bouquet of diverse volatiles.10
46
Page 4 of 46
For acceptance of virgin rapeseed oil on the market and consumer satisfaction, a
47
reliable high sensory quality in terms of a characteristic odor and taste is of particular
48
importance.6 Indeed, virgin rapeseed oils with good sensory properties can be
49
distinguished from oils with poor sensory properties via sensory evaluation.10 Good oils
50
are characterized by the sensory attributes seed-like and nutty, sometimes
51
accompanied by astringent and strawy/woody, whereas poor oils are associated with
52
off-flavors like musty/fusty, roasted/burnt, bitter, or rancid.6,10 Besides these sensory
53
attributes, the oxidation stability and contents of several metabolites contribute to the oil
54
quality, which can be quite heterogeneous on the market.3
55
As the oil quality cannot be improved after the pressing step, any adverse effects of
56
seed management or processing leading to a reduced quality have to be avoided
57
making the production of high-quality virgin rapeseed oil quite challenging.2 Ideally, B.
58
napus seeds are stored at low moisture and low temperature to maintain weak
59
metabolic rates and high seed viability but to prevent at the same time surface molds,
60
seed germination, and adverse effects on oil/fat quality.11-14 High moisture probably is
61
one of the most challenging problems for oil mills, especially if there is rain during
62
harvest of the seed material. Under moist conditions, seeds may initiate germination4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
63
related metabolic processes and microbial communities may grow on seed surfaces.
64
Both processes probably reduce the quality of the produced oils.
65
A few studies describe the effects of seed storage under moist conditions and/or high
66
temperatures on surface molds, seed germination, and oil/fat quality.11-13,15 However,
67
little is known about the link between metabolic processes in the seeds and the chemo-
68
sensory properties of the resulting oils. Moreover, impairments of oil quality caused by
69
inappropriate seed storage may arise already within few days of moist conditions and
70
probably depend on the duration of storage under these conditions. Thus, the aim of
71
this study was to determine the effects of short-term (1-4 days) moist storage of B.
72
napus seeds in a time-resolved manner on the seed metabolome and the chemo-
73
sensory properties of virgin oils produced from these seeds. We used a multi-platform
74
metabolomics approach for comprehensively characterizing the seed and oil
75
metabolomes and linked these metabolic profiles to gain insight in various metabolic
76
effects of moist seed storage relevant for oil quality.
77 78
MATERIALS AND METHODS
79
Chemicals and reagents. Chloroform (HPLC grade) was obtained from AppliChem
80
GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany). Methanol for GC-MS and UHPLC-FLD analyses (LC-MS
81
grade) was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK). Methanol for HPLC-
82
DAD (HPLC grade) analyses was purchased from VWR International (Fontenay-sous-
83
Bois, France). Ribitol (99%), n-alkanes (C8-C40), octane, nonane, and undecane were
84
obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany). L-Norvaline,
85
sarcosine, ortho-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) reagent (10 mg mL-1 in 0.4 M borate buffer
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 46
86
and 3-mercaptoproprionic acid), and 9-fluorenyl-methyl chloroformate (FMOC) reagent
87
(2.5 mg mL-1 in acetonitrile) were purchased from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara,
88
CA, USA; Waldbronn, Germany). 2-Propenyl glucosinolate (sinigrin) was purchased
89
from Phytoplan Diehm & Neuberger GmbH (Heidelberg, Germany). Sephadex (DEAE
90
SephadexTM A-25) was obtained from GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB (Uppsala,
91
Sweden). Pentane, heptane, and tridecane were from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt,
92
Germany). H2O was of Millipore grade. Authentic reference standards were from Sigma-
93
Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim and Taufkirchen, Germany), Merck KGaA, Carl Roth
94
GmbH + Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany), Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG (Düren,
95
Germany), Agilent Technologies, and H+R AG (Salzbergen, Germany).
96
Storage experiment. Brassica napus seeds were obtained from a German oil mill.
97
Seed material was a mixture of different double-low winter-sown rapeseed varieties
98
from conventional farming systems harvested in summer 2013. The storage experiment
99
was conducted in August 2014. Before starting the experiment, the seeds had an initial
100
moisture content of 7.6%. Subsamples of the seed material were taken as control
101
samples (T0) for seed harvest and oil pressing (see below). The remaining seed
102
material was placed on eight plates (47 x 30 x 2 cm; circa 300 g per plate) and daily
103
humidified with tap water (ca. 500 mL per plate per day). The plates were stored at
104
room temperature under daylight conditions. On four consecutive days (T1, T2, T3, T4),
105
two of the plates (A, B) were taken for seed harvest and oil pressing. The time range of
106
four days was used, because it is of practical relevance for oil mills. After four days
107
germination is in an advanced state and such seeds will be refused by oil mills if
108
germination is progressed too far.
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
109
Within each plate, five subsamples of seeds (four in the edges and one in the middle
110
of the plate) of about 2 mL were taken, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored
111
at - 80 °C until chemical analyses. This resulted in a sample number of n = 10 for each
112
time point (2 plates x 5 subsamples). Circa 300 g of the remaining seeds of each plate
113
were used to press oil resulting in two oils (A, B) per time point. After air-drying for 24 h
114
(T1-T3) and 72 h (T4), respectively, the unpeeled seeds were pressed to oil using a
115
screw extrusion press (Komet, IBG Monforts & Reiners GmbH & Co. KG,
116
Mönchengladbach, Germany). Because oils cannot be pressed if the seed material is
117
too moist or seeds are in an advanced state of germination, seed material was mixed
118
with the same volume (1:1, v:v) of dry (T0 group) seeds. The oils were left for 24-72 h at
119
4 °C for sedimentation, filtered with a glass fibre filter (13400-50-Q, Sartorius,
120
Göttingen, Germany), filled in brown glass bottles, and stored at 4 °C until chemical
121
analysis.
122
Seed metabolome. To comprehensively investigate the seed metabolome, a multi-
123
analytical-platform metabolomics approach was chosen. Blanks (without plant material)
124
were measured to discriminate between background- and sample-derived peaks.
125
Authentic reference standards were used for metabolite identifications. Seeds were
126
lyophilized for 48 h and the seed material of each sample was divided into subsamples
127
for different analyses (one seed per subsample for GC-MS analyses; three seeds for
128
UHPLC-FLD and HPLC-DAD analyses, respectively). The subsamples were ground,
129
dry weights of the seed pellets determined (for normalization during data processing,
130
see below), and the seed pellets slackened in a standardized manner (20 times each)
131
with a dissecting needle to improve the extraction of metabolites.
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 46
132
Metabolite profiling of carbohydrates, organic acids, and myo-inositol was performed
133
according to Schweiger et al.16 using one seed per sample. Seed pellets were extracted
134
in chloroform:methanol:H2O containing ribitol as internal standard. Aqueous phases
135
were dried, methoximated, and silylated. Samples and n-alkanes (C8-C40) were
136
analyzed via gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS; Focus GC,
137
DSQII MS; Thermo Electron, Rodano, Italy) using a VF-5 ms column (30 m, 0.25 mm
138
i.d.; Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and electron impact (EI) positive ionization at 70 eV
139
(full scan, 50-750 m/z). Analytes were identified by comparing Kováts retention indices17
140
(RIs) and mass spectra with entries in the Golm metabolome database18 and authentic
141
reference standards. For quantification, peak areas of analytes of the same metabolite
142
were added together, related to those of ribitol and the seed pellet dry weights. Due to
143
technical problems, sample sizes of the T1 and T3 group were reduced to n = 9.
144
Amino acid profiling was done as described in Jakobs and Müller19 using three seeds
145
per sample. Seed pellets were extracted with 80% methanol containing norvaline and
146
sarcosine as internal standards and extracts filtered through 0.2 µm
147
polytetrafluorethylene filters (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). Samples were
148
analyzed via ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to fluorescence
149
detection (UHPLC-FLD; 1290 UHPLC, 1260 FLD, Agilent Technologies) after pre-
150
column derivatization with OPA and FMOC. Amino acids were separated on a ZORBAX
151
Eclipse Plus C18 column (250 mm x 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm, Agilent Technologies) using the
152
gradient described in Jakobs and Müller19 and detected via FLD. Amino acids were
153
identified by comparing their retention times with those of authentic reference
154
standards. They were quantified as peak areas, which were related to those of the
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
155
internal standards (norvaline for primary, sarcosine for secondary amino acids) and the
156
seed pellet dry weights.
157
Glucosinolate profiling was done as described in Abdalsamee and Müller20 using three
158
seeds per sample. Seed pellets were extracted in 80% methanol, adding 2-propenyl
159
glucosinolate (sinigrin) as internal standard. Glucosinolates were converted to
160
desulfoglucosinolates on ion-exchange diethylaminoethyl Sephadex A-25 columns
161
using sulfatase as described20 and analyzed using HPLC coupled to diode array
162
detection (HPLC-DAD, 1200 Series, Agilent Technologies) equipped with a Supelcosil
163
LC-18 column (250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Supelco, PA, USA) using the gradient as
164
described20. Glucosinolates were identified by comparing retention times and UV
165
spectra with entries in an internal database, which had been confirmed by LC-MS.21,22
166
For quantification, peak areas at 229 nm were related to the amount of the internal
167
standard sinigrin, response factors for glucosinolates23, and seed pellet dry weights.
168
Across all analytical platforms, only those metabolites, which were found in at least
169
half of the samples of at least one treatment group, were kept for further data analyses.
170
Total glucosinolate concentrations were compared between treatment groups using a
171
Kruskal-Wallis test in R,24 as data were not normally distributed (tested with Shapiro-
172
Wilk test). After replacing zero values by small (10-13-10-12) random numbers as well as
173
mean-centered unit-variance scaling (i.e., auto-scaling) of the data, principal component
174
analyses (PCA) were conducted in R separately for data derived from the different
175
analytical platforms. For each metabolite, fold changes for the groups T1, T2, T3, and
176
T4 were computed as mean metabolite pool sizes in these groups divided by mean pool
177
sizes in the T0 group. Fold changes were log2-scaled for symmetry around zero. If there
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 46
178
was a valid qualitative difference (i. e., the metabolite was found in at least half of the
179
samples of one group and absent in the other group), the fold change was set to the
180
minimum (decrease in pool size compared to T0) or maximum (increase in pool size)
181
fold change observed in the whole dataset, respectively. If the metabolite was found in
182
less than half of the samples of one group and was absent in the other group, this was
183
interpreted as qualitative difference by chance and hence no fold changes were
184
computed. Pool sizes of metabolites were regarded as considerably lower in the
185
treatment (compared to the T0) group if fold changes were < 0.5 (log2 scale: < -1) and
186
higher if fold changes were > 2 (log2 scale: > 1). Fold changes were plotted as heatmap
187
stripes using Cluster 3.025 and Java TreeView 1.1.6r426 and mapped on a KEGG
188
PATHWAY-derived27 metabolic map adjusted after Schweiger et al.16
189
Volatile profile of the resulting oil. The volatile compounds of the oils were
190
determined via dynamic headspace GC-MS modified according to Bonte et al.10 Each
191
oil was measured five times over five consecutive days (starting 14-18 d after pressing
192
the oils at T0) to test whether the chemical profile of the oils changes over time. In
193
between, oils were stored at 4 °C. Analysis was carried out using the method DGF-C-VI
194
20(15).28 Oils were mixed with alkanes (pentane, heptane, octane, nonane, undecane,
195
tridecane) for RI calculation and heated to 80 °C in a PTA 3000 dynamic headspace
196
system (IMT, Vohenstrauß, Germany). Purged volatiles were trapped, transferred to a
197
GC (Trace 1300 Series, Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany), separated on a CPSil
198
19 fused silica capillary column (14% cyanopropyl-phenyl / 86% dimethylpolysiloxane,
199
60 m x 0.32 mm, 1 µm film thickness), and ions (positive EI mode, 35-300 m/z) detected
200
in a ISQ single quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Metabolites were
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
201
identified via comparison of mass spectra with the NIST Chemistry WebBook
202
(http://webbook.nist.gov)29 and comparison of RIs and mass spectra with authentic
203
reference standards. Quantification was done with the MeltDB platform.30 TAGs were
204
detected automatically, if occurring in 80% of all chromatograms or in 80% of the
205
samples of one group. In contrast to the metabolite profiling of seeds (see above),
206
unidentified features were also quantified, as they may contribute to the sensory
207
impression of the oils. A PCA was conducted and fold changes were computed as
208
described above.
209
Sensory quality of the oil. The sensory oil quality was assessed by a sensory panel
210
of four trained persons according to the standard method of the German Society for Fat
211
Science (DGF) C-II 1.28 The occurrences of the characteristic rapeseed oil attributes
212
seed-like, nutty, strawy/woody, and astringent as well as the off-flavors roasted/burnt,
213
bitter, rancid, musty/fusty, and others were determined using a scale from 0 (not
214
perceived) to 5 (intense). The testers evaluated the two replicate oils (A/B) per
215
treatment group presented in blue-colored glasses with lids individually in a room that
216
was exclusively used for sensory evaluations at 20-22 °C. For each attribute, the
217
median intensity (across the four panellists) was calculated and then the means of the
218
two medians of the replicate oils (A/B) of each treatment group were taken.
219 220 221 222
RESULTS After one day under moist conditions, some seed coats were already burst and seeds rapidly germinated within some days (Figure 1). At four days after moist storage,
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 12 of 46
223
expanding cotyledons were clearly visible. The proportion of germinated seeds (across
224
plates A, B) steeply increased over time.
225
In the seed extracts, 29 primary metabolites could be identified (Table 1). Compared to
226
the control group T0, the primary metabolite profiles of seeds stored under moist
227
conditions were shifted already after one day of moist storage, with the strongest
228
metabolic shifts being obvious at three to four days after moist storage (Figures 2A-D).
229
These metabolic shifts were mainly due to enhanced metabolite pool sizes of glucose,
230
fructose, glyceric acid, dehydroascorbic acid, myo-inositol, and most amino acids
231
(Figures 2A-D, 3). In contrast, raffinose (and, to a lower extent, citric acid) showed
232
decreased pool sizes after storage under moist conditions (Figures 2A-D, 3). As
233
secondary metabolites, 13 glucosinolates were found in the seed extracts (Table 1).
234
The total glucosinolate concentrations ranged from 2.4 to 19.4 µmol g-1 dry weight. By
235
trend, glucosinolate concentrations increased with the moist seed storage time, but the
236
differences were not significant (data not shown; Kruskal-Wallis test: Χ² = 8.361, df = 4,
237
p = 0.079). The seed glucosinolate profiles were strongly affected by moist storage
238
(Figures 2E-F). Compared to the changes in the pool sizes of several primary
239
metabolites, the shift in glucosinolate composition occurred later. The glucosinolate
240
profiles of (germinated) seeds of the T3 and T4 group were clearly separated from the
241
T0 and T1 group, whereas the profiles of the T2 group were in between. This metabolic
242
shift, which started after two days of moist storage, was mainly attributable to an
243
increase in concentrations of indole glucosinolates and, to a lesser extent, the benzyl
244
glucosinolate gluconasturtiin, whereas aliphatic glucosinolates were unaffected or even
245
decreased (Figures 2E-F, 3).
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
246
In the headspace of the virgin rapeseed oils, 60 metabolites of several substance
247
classes could be identified (Table 2) and further 27 unidentified TAGs were detected
248
(Figure S1). The volatile profiles of the oils from seeds, which were stored for different
249
time spans under moist conditions, could be clearly distinguished (Figure 4A).
250
Treatment effects were much stronger than metabolic shifts within the oils over time, as
251
assessed by repeatedly measuring oils over five consecutive days. Some metabolic
252
features were slightly lower concentrated in the oils after moist seed storage for one to
253
two days (T1/T2 versus T0 group; Table 2, Figure 4B, Figure S1) compared to the oils
254
pressed at T0. However, the highest loadings and fold changes were found for
255
compounds having higher concentrations in oils from seeds stored for four days under
256
moist conditions (T4) compared to the other groups (Table 2, Figure 4B). Besides
257
alcohols (3- and 2-methylbutan-1-ol), aldehydes (2-methylpropanal, 2-methylbutanal),
258
and organosulfur compounds (carbonylsulfide, dimethyldisulfide, dimethyltrisulfide), all
259
isothiocyanates and some nitriles detected in this study were increased in the oils of the
260
T4 group (Table 2, Figure 4B).
261
The sensory description of the resulting native oils of the rapeseed samples changed
262
with increasing seed storage time under moist conditions. The control oil pressed from
263
dry seeds (T0) was described with the characteristic attributes of a good virgin rapeseed
264
oil, i.e., seed-like and nutty6,10 (Figure 5). Some testers additionally assigned the
265
attribute strawy/woody, which can occur without indicating something negative.6 No off-
266
flavors were assigned. On average, for those oils pressed from seeds stored under
267
moist conditions for one to four days (T1-T4) the positive attributes seed-like and nutty
268
were assigned with lower intensities, whereas the intensities of the attributes
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 14 of 46
269
strawy/woody and astringent were higher. Other (atypical) impressions occurred in
270
those oils pressed from moist seeds only (Figure 5). The testers described these other
271
impressions as germinated, horseradish-like, spicy, and cress-like, respectively. The
272
impression germinated in the oils appeared and increased from the second day of moist
273
seed storage on, being detected by none (T0, T1), two (T2, T3), and all four (T4) testers
274
consistently in both replicate (A/B) oils (data not shown).
275 276
DISCUSSION
277
For the acceptance of virgin rapeseed oil on the market and consumer satisfaction, a
278
reliable high oil quality is crucial. To understand how this quality is influenced by moist
279
seed storage, this study aimed in linking metabolic processes in the seeds with chemo-
280
sensory properties of the corresponding oils in a time-resolved manner.
281
In general, whereas some of the seed and oil metabolites may be of plant origin,
282
others could be produced by microorganisms associated with the seed material used for
283
oil pressing. Indeed, bacteria are known to produce various metabolites of diverse
284
substance classes.31 Because moisture induced seed germination (Figure 1) but
285
probably also induced growth and metabolic activities of the associated microbiome,
286
metabolic changes in the seeds and oils may be caused by both the plants and the
287
microorganisms. However, it is difficult to ascribe the production of certain metabolites
288
to plant versus microorganism metabolism and for the overall sensory quality of the oil
289
the source is not relevant.
290
The primary metabolites detected in the seeds (Table 1) mainly matched those found
291
earlier in B. napus seeds.32 The rapid increase in concentrations of most seed primary
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
292
metabolites under moist conditions (Figures 2, 3) is probably due to a breakdown of
293
storage compounds. The dominant storage compounds in mature B. napus seeds are
294
proteins and oils.33 Thus, the increase in concentrations of most amino acids is likely
295
caused by a breakdown of storage proteins. Moreover, triglycerides were probably
296
degraded to fatty acids, because increased seed free fatty acid concentrations have
297
been found in B. napus seeds stored under moist conditions.13,14,34 As starch is only
298
transiently accumulated during seed development but almost absent in mature embryos
299
and seeds of rapeseed,33,35 the increases of glucose and fructose may be due to a
300
breakdown of oligosaccharides. Indeed, pool sizes of raffinose were decreased after
301
moist storage. The moisture-induced increases of dehydroascorbic acid may be related
302
to increasing ascorbic acid concentrations during rapeseed germination reported
303
earlier.36 Overall, the rapid seed metabolic reprogramming likely represents the
304
transition from seed dormancy to active metabolism facilitating germination and
305
seedling growth.
306
Most of the glucosinolates found in the seeds (Table 1) already have been reported for
307
B. napus seeds.37-39 Consistently across studies, the aliphatic glucosinolates progoitrin
308
and gluconapin were among the dominant glucosinolates in (ungerminated) seeds (data
309
not shown).37-39 Compared to the primary metabolites, the moisture-induced shift in the
310
glucosinolate profiles occurred one to two days later (Figures 2, 3). As glucosinolates
311
are biosynthesized from glucose and amino acids, the time offset may represent the
312
time needed for sufficient accumulation of these precursors (Figures 2, 3), redirection of
313
metabolic fluxes, and glucosinolate biosynthesis. Remarkably, whereas the total
314
glucosinolate concentrations only slightly increased under moist conditions, the
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 16 of 46
315
concentrations of indole glucosinolates pronouncedly increased. This is consistent with
316
earlier studies showing that concentrations of aliphatic glucosinolates decreased,
317
whereas those of indole glucosinolates increased in seeds of B. napus during
318
germination.37,38 Whether the total concentration of glucosinolates decreases (like
319
reported earlier),37,38 increases (current study), or remains constant during germination
320
may depend on the degree of resource limitation in the seeds, as resources derived
321
from glucosinolate catabolism may be used if needed.38 Dormant B. napus seeds
322
probably are well defended due to their hard seed coat and higher glucosinolate
323
concentrations compared to leaves.39 Indeed, glucosinolates and their hydrolysis
324
products play a pivotal role in plant defense against generalist plant antagonists.8
325
However, after the germination-induced burst of the seed coat, the embryos and
326
emerging seedlings are prone to attacks by herbivores or pathogens. The shift to higher
327
proportions of indole glucosinolates during germination found in the current study for B.
328
napus and for Arabidopsis thaliana earlier23 may confer enhanced resistance to
329
generalist plant antagonists, as the degradation products of indole glucosinolates are
330
particularly biologically active,40 but this has to be tested further.
331
Moist storage of the seeds was also mirrored in the oil volatile profiles. Many of the
332
compounds detected in the oil headspaces (Table 2) have also been found in earlier
333
studies in virgin rapeseed oils.10,41,42 Several of the alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones
334
may be derived from amino acids via Strecker degradation and related pathways or
335
from unsaturated fatty acids via oxidation.43-45 Moreover, dimethylsulfide,
336
dimethyldisulfide, and dimethyltrisulfide could be produced via Strecker degradation
337
from methionine.46 Nitriles and isothiocyanates are typical degradation products of
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
338
glucosinolates8 and were probably formed via non-enzymatic or myrosinase-mediated
339
hydrolysis of the seed glucosinolates during oil pressing. Many of the volatiles showed
340
increased concentrations when seeds were stored under moist conditions, especially
341
after four days (Table 2, Figure 4). However, total concentrations of volatiles did not
342
significantly differ between groups (data not shown). In contrast to this finding, other
343
studies reported higher total concentrations of volatile compounds in sensory poor
344
compared to good virgin rapeseed oils.10,15 The increased oil concentrations of 2-
345
methylpropanal after moist seed storage fit well to the finding that this compound is
346
generally higher in poor compared to good virgin rapeseed oils.10 The increase of this
347
aldehyde may be linked to the increased seed amino acid concentrations under moist
348
storage, as it may be produced from amino acids (see above). The increases in
349
dimethyldisulfide and dimethyltrisulfide probably are related to higher availabilities of
350
their precursor, methionine (Figure 3).46 However, dimethylsulfide was only slightly
351
influenced by moist seed storage in the current study (Table 2, Figure 4) and higher in
352
sensory good rapeseed oils compared to those with a musty/fusty off-flavor in an earlier
353
study.47 The increased concentrations of all isothiocyanates (and some nitriles) are
354
assumed to be related to metabolic shifts in the seed glucosinolate profiles (Figures 2,
355
3). Strikingly, 4-isothiocyanato-1-butene was higher in sensory good compared to
356
sensory poor virgin rapeseed oils in an earlier study,10 but increased in oil prepared
357
after moist seed storage in the current study (Table 2, Figure 4). Concentrations of seed
358
indole glucosinolates increased under moisture (Figures 2, 3), but the isothiocyanates
359
and nitriles produced from these glucosinolates are unstable and rapidly converted to
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
360
other products.40 Thus, the link between changes in the seed glucosinolates and oil
361
isothiocyanates is somehow vague and needs further investigation.
Page 18 of 46
362
The slightly lower concentrations of aldehydes (e.g., butanal, pentanal, heptanal,
363
octanal) in oils pressed from seeds stored under moist conditions for one day (T1)
364
compared to those pressed from dry (T0) seeds (Table 2, Figure 4) were unexpected.
365
These aldehydes are known as degradation products from autoxidation of unsaturated
366
fatty acids45 and related to certain off-flavors in virgin edible oils if occurring in higher
367
concentrations (Table 2). However, despite this metabolic shift the T1 oils kept their
368
seed-like sensory impression (Figure 5). Given the well-known aroma-activity of
369
aldehydes (Table 2) and the fact that clear atypical sensory impressions occurred later
370
in parallel to increasing isothiocyanate concentrations (Figures 4, 5), these results
371
indicate the dominant impact of glucosinolate degradation products on the flavor of
372
rapeseed oil.
373
The shifts in the oil volatile profiles led to distinct sensory impressions. Many of the
374
rapeseed oil volatiles were described as odor- and aroma-active with compound-
375
specific odor thresholds (Table 2).10,42,48-50 Shifts in the composition of these volatile
376
metabolites may explain the increase of atypical sensory impressions of the oils along
377
with moist seed storage (Figure 5). In fact, chemical and aroma profiles of rapeseeds
378
and the oils pressed from these are quite correlated.47 Although neither off-flavor
379
attributes related to improper seed storage (i. e., musty/fusty), seed pre-pressing
380
treatment (roasted/burnt), or oil storage (rancid)10 were assigned to any oil, other
381
atypical sensory impressions for oils pressed from moist seeds (germinated,
382
horseradish-like, spicy, cress-like) indicate that increased isothiocyanate concentrations
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
383
may be responsible for these sensory impressions. Indeed, isothiocyanates confer
384
sulfury, garlic, and pungent sensory impressions.48 Specifically, the increased
385
concentration of 4-isothiocyanato-1-butene (odor threshold: 5 mg kg-1, unpublished
386
data) probably contributes to the sensory poor impression of the corresponding oils, as
387
high contents of this volatile are associated with strong off-flavors.43 Although
388
glucosinolate degradation products to a certain degree confer the characteristic flavor
389
and pungency to rapeseed oils, they can also cause off-flavors. In contrast to germ oil,
390
germination-related sensory impressions found in this study (germinated, horseradish-
391
like, spicy, cress-like) after moist storage of the seeds are not desired for virgin
392
rapeseed oil and therefore occur as atypical off-flavors. Moreover, other oil volatiles
393
may contribute to the sensory impressions, with or without being aroma-active
394
themselves.10
395
Apart from these sensory impressions, which strongly affect oil acceptance by the
396
consumers, the actual implications of changes in oil quality for human nutrition and
397
health have to be considered. Moist storage of B. napus seeds lowers the proportion of
398
essential (poly)unsaturated fatty acids11,12 as well as the contents of tocopherols34 in
399
rapeseed oil, thereby reducing its value in terms of nutrition and health. The implications
400
of increased concentrations of indole glucosinolates in the seeds and isothiocyanates in
401
the oils are less obvious. These compounds can be anti-nutritional, toxic, and
402
goitrogenic, but can also prevent cancer and be anti-inflammatory, thereby promoting
403
health.5,9,51 Further studies are needed to assess the values of different virgin rapeseed
404
oils in terms of nutrition and health.
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
405
Page 20 of 46
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that moisture during B. napus seed storage
406
induces rapid metabolic shifts in the seeds, which translate into shifts in the volatile
407
profiles of the corresponding oils leading to atypical and undesirable sensory
408
impressions. By linking metabolic effects of moist seed storage on the seeds and
409
corresponding oils, this study adds significant knowledge to the field of virgin rapeseed
410
oil quality control. Specifically, it contributes to the understanding of the role of seed
411
germination for oil quality. Our study cannot uncover effects of long-term moist storage
412
of seeds, but emphasizes that even short moist seed storage of up to four days
413
pronouncedly impairs oil quality. This is of high relevance, because seeds stored for
414
longer time under moist conditions are probably not used for oil pressing due to visible
415
advanced germination and mold. However, seeds stored moistly for only some days like
416
in this study may be used for oil production, especially if they are mixed with dry seeds.
417
As the described metabolic shifts are irreversible,2 it is of utmost importance to ensure
418
proper seed storage conditions to produce high-quality virgin rapeseed oil in terms of
419
sensory impressions and value for nutrition and health.
420 421
ABBREVIATIONS USED
422
FMOC, 9-fluorenyl-methyl chloroformate; GC-MS, gas chromatography coupled to mass
423
spectrometry; HPLC-DAD, high performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode
424
array detection; m/z, mass-to-charge ratio; OPA, ortho-phthaldialdehyde; PC, principal
425
component;
426
chromatography coupled to fluorescence detection; abbreviations of metabolites: see
427
Tables 1, 2.
RI,
retention
index;
UHPLC-FLD,
ultra-high
performance
liquid
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
428
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
429
We thank Karin Djendouci for practical help with the glucosinolate analyses and the
430
Bioinformatics Resource Facility (BRF), which is part of the Center for Biotechnology
431
(CeBiTec) at Bielefeld University, for the expert technical support with the MeltDB 2.0
432
platform.
433
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
434
Includes mass spectra of unidentified TAGs of the volatiles from the headspaces of
435
rapeseed oils (PDF).
436
AUTHOR INFORMATION
437
Corresponding Author
438
*Phone: +49521-1065636; Fax: +49521-1062963; Email: rabea.schweiger@uni-
439
bielefeld.de
440
ORCID
441
Rabea Schweiger: 0000-0001-8467-4966
442
Funding
443
This IGF Project of the FEI is supported via AiF within the programme for promoting the
444
Industrial Collective Research (IGF) of the German Ministry of Economics and
445
Energy(BMWi), based on a resolution of the German Parliament.
446
Notes
447
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
448
Author Contributions
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 22 of 46
449
AB, RS, LB, BM, and CM designed the study. RS, CP, and CM carried out the seed
450
metabolome analyses. AB, CW, LB, and BM did the chemical and sensory analyses of
451
the oils. AB, RS, CP, and CW analyzed the data. AB, RS, LB, BM, and CM wrote the
452
publication.
453
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
454
REFERENCES
455
(1)
crops suitable for human nutrition. Ind. Crops Prod. 2006, 24, 75-78.
456 457
Carvalho, I. S.; Miranda, I.; Pereira, H. Evaluation of oil composition of some
(2)
Matthäus, B.; Brühl, L. Why is it so difficult to produce high-quality virgin
458
rapeseed oil for human consumption? Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2008, 110, 611-
459
617.
460
(3)
Nahrung 2003, 47, 413-419.
461 462
(4)
(5)
(6)
Brühl, L.; Matthäus, B. Sensory assessment of virgin rapeseed oils. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2008, 110, 608-610.
467 468
Jahangir, M.; Kim, H. K.; Choi, Y. H.; Verpoorte, R. Health-Affecting Compounds in Brassicaceae. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2009, 8, 31-43.
465 466
Teh, S.-S.; Birch, J. Physicochemical and quality characteristics of cold-pressed hemp, flax and canola seed oils. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2013, 30, 26-31.
463 464
Matthäus, B.; Brühl, L. Quality of cold-pressed edible rapeseed oil in Germany.
(7)
Fahey, J. W.; Zalcmann, A. T.; Talalay, P. The chemical diversity and distribution
469
of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 2001, 56, 5-
470
51.
471
(8)
Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 303-333.
472 473
Halkier, B. A.; Gershenzon, J. Biology and Biochemistry of Glucosinolates. Annu.
(9)
Hanschen, F. S.; Lamy, E.; Schreiner, M.; Rohn, S. Reactivity and Stability of
474
Glucosinolates and Their Breakdown Products in Foods. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
475
2014, 53, 11430-11450.
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
476
(10)
Bonte, A.; Brühl, L.; Vosmann, K.; Matthäus, B. A chemometric approach for the
477
differentiation of sensory good and bad (musty/fusty) virgin rapeseed oils on
478
basis of selected volatile compounds analyzed by dynamic headspace GC-MS.
479
Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2017, 119, 1600259.
480
(11)
Page 24 of 46
El-Nakhlawy, F. S.; Al-Qurashi, A. D. Using Salicylic Acid Treatment of Stored
481
Canola Seed to Decrease the Adversely Effects on Oil quality under Long-Term
482
Storage, High Storage Temperature and Seed Moisture Contents. J. Agric. Sci.
483
2014, 6, 75-83.
484
(12)
moisture conditions. Pol. J. Natur. Sc. 2013, 28, 485-499.
485 486
(13)
Sathya, G.; Jayas, D. S.; White, N. D. G. Safe storage guidelines for canola as the seeds slowly dry. Can. Biosyst. Eng. 2009, 51, 3.29-3.38.
487 488
Faron, A.; Tańska, M. Changes of fat quality in rapeseed stored under increased
(14)
Sun, K.; Jian, F.; Jayas, D. S.; White, N. D. G. Quality changes in high and low
489
oil content canola during storage: Part I - safe storage time under constant
490
temperatures. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2014, 59, 320-327.
491
(15)
Jeleń, H. H.; Obuchowska, M.; Zawirska-Wojtasiak, R.; Wa̧sowicz, E. Headspace
492
Soild-Phase Microextraction Use for the Characterization of Volatile Compounds
493
in Vegetable Oils of Different Sensory Quality. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48,
494
2360-2367.
495 496
(16)
Schweiger, R.; Baier, M. C.; Persicke, M.; Müller, C. High specificity in plant leaf metabolic responses to arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3886.
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 46
497
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(17)
Kováts, E. Gaschromatographische Charakterisierung organischer
498
Verbindungen. 1. Retentionsindices aliphatischer Halogenide, Alkohole,
499
Aldehyde und Ketone. Helv. Chim. Acta 1958, 41, 1915-1932.
500
(18)
Kopka, J.; Schauer, N.; Krueger, S.; Birkemeyer, C.; Usadel, B.; Bergmüller, E.;
501
Dörmann, P.; Weckwerth, W.; Gibon, Y.; Stitt, M.; et al.
[email protected]: the
502
Golm Metabolome Database. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 1635-1638.
503
(19)
Jakobs, R.; Müller, C. Effects of intraspecific and intra-individual differences in
504
plant quality on preference and performance of monophagous aphid species.
505
Oecologia 2017. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-3998-x.
506
(20)
Abdalsamee, M. K.; Müller, C. Effects of Indole Glucosinolates on Performance
507
and Sequestration by the Sawfly Athalia rosae and Consequences of Feeding on
508
the Plant Defense System. J. Chem. Ecol. 2012, 38, 1366-1375.
509
(21)
Kutyniok, M.; Müller, C. Crosstalk between above- and belowground herbivores
510
is mediated by minute metabolic responses of the host Arabidopsis thaliana. J.
511
Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 6199-6210.
512
(22)
Fortuna, T. M.; Eckert, S.; Harvey, J. A.; Vet, L. E. M.; Müller, C.; Gols, R.
513
Variation in plant defences among populations of a range-expanding plant:
514
consequences for trophic interactions. New Phytol. 2014, 204, 989-999.
515
(23)
Brown, P. D.; Tokuhisa, J. G.; Reichelt, M.; Gershenzon, J. Variation of
516
glucosinolate accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of
517
Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 2003, 62, 471-481.
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
518
(24)
R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical
519
computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL
520
https://www.R-project.org/. 2016, version 3.3.2.
521
(25)
(26)
(27)
Kaneshia, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27-30.
526 527
Saldanha, A. J. Java Treeview – extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 3246-3248.
524 525
de Hoon, M. J. L.; Imoto, S.; Nolan, J.; Miyano, S. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1453-1454.
522 523
Page 26 of 46
(28)
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Fettwissenschaften e. V. Deutsche Einheitsmethoden
528
zur Untersuchung von Fetten, Fettprodukten, Tensiden und verwandten Stoffen;
529
Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft: Stuttgart, 2013.
530
(29)
Linstrom, P. J.; Mallard, W. G. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard
531
Reference Database Number 69; National Institute of Standards and
532
Technology: Gaithersburg MD.
533
(30)
Kessler, N.; Neuweger, H.; Bonte, A.; Langenkämper, G.; Niehaus, K.;
534
Nattkemper, T. W.; Goesmann, A. MeltDB 2.0 – advances of the metabolomics
535
software system. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 2452-2459.
536
(31)
Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 814-842.
537 538 539
Schulz, S.; Dickschat, J. S. Bacterial volatiles: the smell of small organisms. Nat.
(32)
Clauß, K.; von Roepenack-Lahaye, E.; Böttcher, C.; Roth, M. R.; Welti, R.; Erban, A.; Kopka, J.; Scheel, D.; Milkowski, C.; Strack, D. Overexpression of
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
540
Sinapine Esterase BnSCE3 in Oilseed Rape Seeds Triggers Global Changes in
541
Seed Metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1127-1145.
542
(33)
(Brassica napus L.). Planta 1975, 123, 163-174.
543 544
Norton, G.; Harris, J. F. Compositional Changes in Developing Rape Seed
(34)
Gawrysiak-Witulska, M.; Siger, A.; Wawrzyniak, J.; Nogala-Kalucka, M. Changes
545
in Tocochromanol Content in Seeds of Brassica napus L. During Adverse
546
Conditions of Storage. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2011, 88, 1379-1385.
547
(35)
da Silva, P. M. F. R.; Eastmond, P. J.; Hill, L. M.; Smith, A. M.; Rawsthorne, S.
548
Starch metabolism in developing embryos of oilseed rape. Planta 1997, 203,
549
480-487.
550
(36)
rapeseed cultivars. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 1995, 47, 63-70.
551 552
Sattar, A.; Badshah, A.; Aurangzeb. Biosynthesis of ascorbic acid in germinating
(37)
Ciska, E.; Honke, J.; Kozłowska, H. Effect of Light Conditions on the Contents of
553
Glucosinolates in Germinating Seeds of White Mustard, Red Radish, White
554
Radish, and Rapeseed. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 9087-9093.
555
(38)
Clossais-Besnard, N.; Larher, F. Physiological Role of Glucosinolates in Brassica
556
napus. Concentration and Distribution Pattern of Glucosinolates among Plant
557
Organs during a Complete Life Cycle. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1991, 56, 25-38.
558
(39)
Velasco, P.; Soengas, P.; Vilar, M.; Cartea, M. E; del Rio, M. Comparison of
559
Glucosinolate Profiles in Leaf and Seed Tissues of Different Brassica napus
560
Crops. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2008, 133, 551-558.
561 562
(40)
Agerbirk, N.; de Vos, M.; Kim, J. H.; Jander, G. Indole glucosinolate breakdown and its biological effects. Phytochem. Rev. 2009, 8, 101-120.
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
563
(41)
Page 28 of 46
Hu, W.; Zhang, L.; Li, P.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, B.; Sun, X.; Ma, F.; Ding, X.
564
Characterization of volatile components in four vegetable oils by headspace two-
565
dimensional comprehensive chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
566
Talanta 2014, 129, 629-635.
567
(42)
Matheis, K.; Granvogl, M. Characterisation of the key aroma compounds in
568
commercial native cold-pressed rapeseed oil by means of the Sensomics
569
approach. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 242, 1565-1575.
570
(43)
Zhou, Q.; Yang, M.; Huang, F.; Zheng, C.; Deng, Q. Effect of Pretreatment with
571
Dehulling and Microwaving on the Flavor Characteristics of Cold-Pressed
572
Rapeseed Oil by GC-MS-PCA and Electronic Nose Discrimination. J. Food Sci.
573
2013, 78, C961-C970.
574
(44)
Yaylayan, V. A. Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Strecker Degradation and
575
Amadori Rearrangement: Implications to Aroma and Color Formation. Food Sci.
576
Technol. Res. 2003, 9, 1-6.
577
(45)
Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2006, 5, 169-186.
578 579
Choe, E.; Min, D. B. Mechanisms and Factors for Edible Oil Oxidation. Compr.
(46)
Ballance, P. E. Production of volatile compounds related to the flavour of foods
580
from the Strecker degradation of DL-methionine. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1961, 12,
581
532-536.
582
(47)
Matheis, K.; Granvogl, M. Characterization of Key Odorants Causing a
583
Fusty/Musty Off-Flavor in Native Cold-Pressed Rapeseed Oil by Means of the
584
Sensomics Approach. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 8168-8178.
28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 46
585
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(48)
Engel, E.; Baty, C.; le Corre, D.; Souchon, I.; Martin, N. Flavor-Active
586
Compounds Potentially Implicated in Cooked Cauliflower Acceptance. J. Agric.
587
Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6459-6467.
588
(49)
Pollner, G.; Schieberle, P. Characterization of the Key Odorants in Commercial
589
Cold-Pressed Oils from Unpeeled and Peeled Rapeseeds by the Sensomics
590
Approach. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 627-636.
591
(50)
Related Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4825-4836.
592 593
(51)
Cartea, M. E.; Velasco, P. Glucosinolates in Brassica foods: bioavailability in food and significance for human health. Phytochem. Rev. 2008, 7, 213-229.
594 595
Sablé, S.; Cottenceau, G. Current Knowledge of Soft Cheeses Flavor and
(52)
Díaz-Maroto, M. C.; Díaz-Maroto Hidalgo, I. J.; Sánchez-Palomo, E.; Pérez-
596
Coello, M. S. Volatile Components and Key Odorants of Fennel (Foeniculum
597
vulgare Mill.) and Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) Oil Extracts Obtained by
598
Simultaneous Distillation-Extraction and Supercritical Fluid Extraction. J. Agric.
599
Food Chem. 2005, 53, 5385-5389.
600 601
602
29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
603
Page 30 of 46
FIGURE CAPTIONS
604 605
Figure 1. Germination of Brassica napus seeds during storage under moist conditions
606
for one (T1), two (T2), three (T3), and four (T4) days, respectively.
607 608
Figure 2. Principal component analyses including metabolites (A, B: carbohydrates,
609
organic acids, one cyclic polyol; C, D: amino acids; E, F: glucosinolates) of Brassica
610
napus seeds after storage under moist conditions for zero (T0), one (T1), two (T2),
611
three (T3), and four (T4) days, respectively. (A, C, E) Score plots with the percentage of
612
total variance explained by the principal components in parentheses, group median
613
scores as larger symbols, groups surrounded by convex hulls. (B, D, F) Loadings plots
614
with loadings as arrows and loadings axes at the top and right (bottom and left: score
615
axes as in score plots). For metabolite abbreviations, see Table 1; n = 9-10 (2 plates x 5
616
subsamples). Within the groups T1-T4, black dots in the symbols indicate subsamples
617
from plate A (symbols without dots: plate B).
618 619
Figure 3. Metabolic map showing changes in pool sizes of metabolites in Brassica
620
napus seeds after storage under moist conditions for one (T1), two (T2), three (T3), and
621
four (T4) days, compared to the common control group (T0 – zero days). Major pathway
622
intermediates are shown, whereas dashed arrows indicate that intermediates were
623
omitted. Metabolites, which were found in B. napus seeds, are given in black. Heatmap
624
stripes show the mean fold changes (mean metabolite pool size in group compared to
625
mean pool size in common control group) on a log2 scale using a color code (blue –
30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 31 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
626
lower metabolite pool size, yellow – higher pool size). Fold change thresholds of < 0.5
627
(log2 scale: < -1) and > 2 (log2 scale: > 1) are delineated in the color bar. Crosses in the
628
heatmap stripes indicate that fold changes were set to minimum or maximum,
629
respectively, as metabolites were found in at least half of the samples of one group but
630
were absent in the other group. Grey squares mean that no fold changes were
631
computed, as metabolites were found in less than half of the samples of one group and
632
were absent in the other group. Full names of metabolites are shown at the top right-
633
hand corner and in Table 1. Means of n = 9-10 (2 plates x 5 subsamples).
634 635
Figure 4. Principal component analysis of volatile compounds of Brassica napus oils
636
after storage of the corresponding seeds under moist conditions for zero (T0), one (T1),
637
two (T2), three (T3), and four (T4) days, respectively. (A) Score plot with the percentage
638
of total variance explained by the principal components in parentheses, group median
639
scores as larger symbols, groups surrounded by convex hulls. (B) Loadings plot with
640
loadings as arrows and loadings axes at the top and right (bottom and left: score axes
641
as in score plot). No loading is shown for PrOH, as it was too short for illustration. For
642
metabolite abbreviations, see Table 2. TAGs are given with their respective numbers
643
(see Figure S1); n = 10 (2 plates x 5 measurements over time). Within the groups, black
644
dots in the symbols indicate the oil pressed from plate A (symbols without dots: oil from
645
plate B). Roman numbers represent the day of measurement of the oil.
646 647
Figure 5. Sensory quality of virgin oil pressed from Brassica napus seeds after storage
648
of the seeds under moist conditions for zero (T0), one (T1), two (T2), three (T3), and
31 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 32 of 46
649
four (T4) days, respectively, presented as radar charts. For each attribute, means
650
(replicate oils A/B) of the medians (four panellists) are given for each treatment group.
651
Full names of sensory attributes are given in the top-right corner. Off-flavor attributes
652
are highlighted with a grey area.
32 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 33 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TABLES Table 1. Metabolites Identified in Brassica napus Seeds analytical b platform
a
metabolite
retention c parameter
chemical class
abbreviation
name
carbohydrates
Frc
fructose
GC-MS
1860/1870
Glc
glucose
GC-MS
Suc
sucrose
Raf
organic acids
cyclic polyols
characteristic m/z
d
identification
GMD
std
217/277/364/335/307
x
x
1884/1902
319/229/343/305/160
x
x
GC-MS
2616
451/361/319/157/437
x
x
raffinose
GC-MS
3350
451/361/217/204/437
x
x
Glyc
glyceric acid
GC-MS
1324
189/307/205/133/292
x
x
Mal
malic acid
GC-MS
1484
245/335/307/217/233
x
x
Cit
citric acid
GC-MS
1811
375/211/183/257/273
x
x
Dehy-Asc
dehydroascorbic acid
GC-MS
1839
173/157/245/231/316
x
Ino
myo-inositol
GC-MS
2075
265/318/191/507/305
x
ASP
aspartic acid
UHPLC-FLD
2.9
min
x
GLU
glutamic acid
UHPLC-FLD
4.6
min
x
x
amino acids primary
33 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
e
idb
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
secondary
Page 34 of 46
ASN
asparagine
UHPLC-FLD
8.7
min
x
SER
serine
UHPLC-FLD
9.4
min
x
GLN
glutamine
UHPLC-FLD
11.0
min
x
HIS
histidine
UHPLC-FLD
11.5
min
x
GLY
glycine
UHPLC-FLD
12.3
min
x
THR
threonine
UHPLC-FLD
12.7
min
x
ARG
arginine
UHPLC-FLD
15.0
min
x
ALA
alanine
UHPLC-FLD
15.7
min
x
GABA
γ-aminobutyric acid
UHPLC-FLD
16.4
min
x
TYR
tyrosine
UHPLC-FLD
19.0
min
x
VAL
valine
UHPLC-FLD
23.4
min
x
MET
methionine
UHPLC-FLD
24.1
min
x
TRP
tryptophan
UHPLC-FLD
26.3
min
x
PHE
phenylalanine
UHPLC-FLD
27.1
min
x
ILE
isoleucine
UHPLC-FLD
27.5
min
x
LEU
leucine
UHPLC-FLD
29.2
min
x
LYS
lysine
UHPLC-FLD
30.3
min
x
PRO
proline
UHPLC-FLD
38.8
min
x
2ROH3but
progoitrin (2-R-2-hydroxy-3-butenyl)
HPLC-DAD
6.3
min
glucosinolates
aliphatic
x
34 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 35 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
4MSOB
glucoraphanin (4-methylsulfinylbutyl)
HPLC-DAD
7.4
min
x
2SOH3but
epiprogoitrin (2-S-2-hydroxy-3-butenyl)
HPLC-DAD
7.5
min
x
1ME
glucoputranjivin (1-methylethyl)
HPLC-DAD
13.3
min
(x)
5MSOP
glucoalyssin (5-methylsulfinylpentyl)
HPLC-DAD
15.0
min
x
3but
gluconapin (3-butenyl)
HPLC-DAD
17.2
min
x
4pent
glucobrassicanapin (4-pentenyl)
HPLC-DAD
22.7
min
x
5MTP
glucoberteroin (5-methylthiopentyl)
HPLC-DAD
27.1
min
x
benzyl
2PE
gluconasturtiin (2-phenylethyl)
HPLC-DAD
27.0
min
x
indole
4OHI3M
HPLC-DAD
18.2
min
HPLC-DAD
24.2
min
HPLC-DAD
27.2
min
HPLC-DAD
29.6
min
4-hydroxyglucobrassicin
x
(4-hydroxy-indol-3-ylmethyl) glucobrassicin I3M
x
(indol-3-ylmethyl) 4-methoxyglucobrassicin 4MOI3M
x
(4-methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl) neoglucobrassicin 1MOI3M
x
(1-methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl)
a
Within each chemical class, metabolites are ordered according to their retention time. Names of organic acids are given in protonated form. For glucosinolates, common names are given with the side chains in parentheses. b GC-MS – gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry; UHPLC-FLD – ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to fluorescence detection; HPLC-FLD – HPLC coupled to diode array detection. c For GC-MS data, Kováts retention indices are given, whereas retention times are given for the other analytical platforms. If one metabolite had more than one analyte (GC-MS), retention indices of both analytes are shown. d m/z – mass-to-charge ratio. Characteristic m/z values for each metabolite are shown.
35 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 36 of 46
e
It is indicated whether metabolites were identified via comparison of retention parameters, UV spectra (for HPLC-DAD), and mass spectra (for GC-MS) with entries in the Golm metabolome database (GMD; GC-MS data only), an internal glucosinolate database (idb; HPLC-DAD data only), and/or authentic standards (std). Crosses indicate successful identification, whereas missing crosses indicate that the corresponding metabolite was not deposited in the database or no standard was available. Crosses in parentheses mean that the metabolite could only tentatively be identified, as not all parameters used for identification fit well.
36 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 37 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 2. Volatile Metabolites Identified in the Headspace of Brassica napus Virgin Oil
a
b
metabolite
RI
chemical class
abbreviation
name
alcohols
EtOH
ethanol
537
PrOH
propan-1-ol
aldehydes
characteristic m/z
c
identifid cation NIST
std
45/46
x
x
657
41/42/59/60
x
x
g
f
sensory quality
g
2MePrOH
2-methylpropan-1-ol
735
41/42/43/74
x
BuOH
butan-1-ol
772
41/43/55/56 (74)
x
x
3MeBuOH
3-methylbutan-1-ol
842
41/42/43/55/57/70 (88)
x
x
2MeBuOH 2.3BuOHI 2.3BuOHII HexOH HepOH 1Oc3OH
2-methylbutan-1-ol h butane-2,3-diol I h butane-2,3-diol II hexan-1-ol heptan-1-ol 1-octen-3-ol
844 961 972 976 1075 1078
41/55/56/57/70 (88) 45/57 (90) 45/57 (90) 27/29/31/39/41/42/43/55/56/69/84 (102) 41/42/43/55/56/57/69/70/83/103 (116) 43/57/72/85 (128)
x x
x x x
x x x
x x
EtCHO 2MePrCHO
acetaldehyde 2-methylpropanal
487 608
29/43/44 39/41//43/72
x x
x x
BuCHO
butanal
661
27/29/39/41/43/44/57/72
x
3MeBuCHO
3-methylbutanal
735
44/58/71/86
x
x
2MeBuCHO PeCHO HexCHO
2-methylbutanal pentanal hexanal
739 779 884
39/41//57/58/86 41/44/57/58/86 41/43/44/56/57/72/83 (100)
x x x
x x x
HepCHO
heptanal
990
41/42/43/44/55/57/70/71/81/86/96 (114)
x
x
OcCHO
octanal
1093
41/42/43/44/55/56/57/69/84 (128)
x
x
g
log2 fold e change
10
solvent
mushroom
42,48
10
g
moldy, sweet pungent, unpleasant, 10,48 cheese-like malty, cheese-like, flea10,42,49 bitten 42,49 malty 10 cheese-like, moldy 10,42,48,49 green, grass green, sweet, lemon, flower-like, fatty, 10,48 rancid green, lemon, 10,49 grass
37 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
isothiocyanates
NoCHO
nonanal
1199
41/43/44/55/56/57/68/69/70/81/82/98 (142)
2Octenal
2-octenal
1181
27/29/39/41/42/55/57/67/69/70/82/83 (126)
2PrITC
isopropylisothiocyanate
935
41/43/60/86/101
x
x
AITC
allylisothiocyanate
997
39/41/72/99
x
x
1ITCBu
1-isothiocyanatobutane
1037
29/41/56/57/72/115
(x)
2BuITC
isobutylisothiocyanate 4-isothiocyanato-1butene cyclopentylisothiocyana te
1064
27/29/39/41/43/57/72/73/115
x
1107
55/72/85/113
x
1215
39/41/67/68/69/127
x
2.3BuO2
butane-2,3-dione
681
43/86
2HeO
heptan-2-one
986
43/58/71/114
x
3Oc2O
3-octen-2-one
1158
41/43/55/97/111/126
x
MeICN 2MePrCN 3PCN 5HexCN
methylisocyanide 2-methylpropanenitrile 3-pentenenitrile 5-hexenenitrile 2propenylthioacetonitrile
596 746 908 1011
40/41 28/41/42/54/68/69 39/41/54/81 39/41/55/67/80/95
x x x x
1357
39/41/45/73/113
(x)
COS
carbonylsulfide
460
32/60
x
CH4S
methanethiol
489
45/47/48
x
DMS
dimethylsulfide
542
45/46/47/61/62
x
4ITC1Bu CycPeITC ketones
nitriles
2PrSNCS
organosulfur compounds
Page 38 of 46
x
x x
green, citrus, detergent, soap, 10,48,49 sweet fatty, nutty, 10,42,49 roasted
sulfur, garlic, 48 pungent sulfury, pungent, 48 green
x
(x)
48,49
buttery, caramel musty, spicy, blue 50 cheese 48 nutty
x
x
sulfur, 48 cookedcabbage moldy, cheese-like, fleabitten, cabbage, cooked 10,48,49 cauliflower
38 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 39 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
terpenes
others
DMDS
dimethyldisulfide
813
45/46/47/61/64/79/94
x
x
MeTC
methylthiocyanate
857
45/46/58/72/73
x
x
DMTS
dimethyltrisulfide
1060
44/47/64/79/110/126/128
x
x
DMSO
dimethylsulfone
1200
15/79/94
x
αPin βPin Lim Cam
α-pinene β-pinene limonene camphor
954 1010 1063 1279
77/79/91/92/93/105/121/136 41/69/77/79/91/93/121/136 67/68/79/93/107/121/136 39/41/55/69/81/83/95/108/109/110/152
x x x x
Et2O 3MePe MeChl MeCycPe 3MeFu Tol XylI XylII Et4PeOate Styr Myr 4But
diethylether 3-methylpentane methylenechloride methylcyclopentane 3-methylfuran toluene h xyleneI h xyleneII ethyl 4-pentenoate styrene β-myrcene γ-butyrolactone
518 554 575 611 644 820 917 924 958 963 1024 1142
31/45/59/74 29/41/43/56/57/71/86 49/51/84/86 (85) 41/55/56/69/84 27/39/53/81/82 65/91/92 77/91/105/106 77/91/105/106 27/29/39/54/55/83 (128) 51/77/78/103/104 27/39/41/69/93 (136) 27/28/29/41/42/56/86
x x x x x x x x
4Val
γ-valerolactone
1177
41/56/85/100
x x x x
cabbage, sulfur, 48 ripened cheese 48 sulfur sulfur, cauliflower, 10,42,49 cabbage
10,48,49
citrus, spicy 52 camphor, rancid, oily
sweet, fruity
x x x
x x x x x x x
x
x
mushroom, earth10 moist
10
a
Within each chemical class, metabolites are ordered according to their retention time. Kováts retention indices.
b
39 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 40 of 46
c
m/z – mass-to-charge ratio. Characteristic m/z values for each metabolite as shown in the NIST Chemistry WebBook. Molecular ions are indicated in bold if they were part of the characteristic mass spectra, otherwise molecular ions are parenthesized. d It is indicated whether metabolites were identified via comparison of mass spectra with those deposited in the NIST Chemistry WebBook and/or via comparison of retention indices and mass spectra with those of authentic standards (std). Crosses indicate successful identification, whereas missing crosses indicate that the corresponding metabolite was not deposited in the database or no standard was available. Crosses in parentheses mean that the metabolite could only tentatively be identified, as not all parameters used for identification fit well. e Mean fold changes (log2 scale) of metabolite pool sizes after storage of seeds under moist conditions for one (T1), two (T2), three (T3), and four (T4) days, compared to the common control (T0) group, given as heatmap stripes. The color code (blue - lower metabolite pool size, yellow higher pool size) is given at the end of the column. Fold change thresholds of < 0.5 (log2 scale: < -1) and > 2 (log2 scale: > 1) are indicated in the color bar. Crosses in the heatmap stripes indicate that fold changes were set to minimum or maximum, respectively, as metabolites were found in at least half of the samples of one group but were absent in the other group. Grey squares mean that no fold changes were computed, as metabolites were found in less than half of the samples of one group and were absent in the other group. Means of n = 10 (2 plates x 5 measurements over time). f Volatiles were described to be aroma-active by the specified references. g Equal RIs, because volatiles could chromatographically not be separated. Thus, fold changes were calculated based on the sum of both metabolites. h Roman numerals describe R-/S-isomers of the same metabolite.
40 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 41 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
FIGURE GRAPHICS Figure 1
41 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 42 of 46
Figure 2
42 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 43 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3
43 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 44 of 46
Figure 4
44 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 45 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 5
653
45 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 46 of 46
TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAPHIC
46 ACS Paragon Plus Environment