Subscriber access provided by - Access paid by the | UCSB Libraries
Environmental Processes
Microbial Selenate Reduction Driven by a Denitrifying Anaerobic Methane Oxidation Biofilm Jinghuan Luo, Hui Chen, Shihu Hu, Chen Cai, Zhiguo Yuan, and Jianhua Guo Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05046 • Publication Date (Web): 13 Mar 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 14, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Microbial Selenate Reduction Driven by a Denitrifying Anaerobic Methane Oxidation Biofilm
2
Jing-Huan Luo#, Hui Chen#, Shihu Hu, Chen Cai, Zhiguo Yuan, Jianhua Guo*
3
Advanced Water Management Centre, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Information
4
Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
5
*Corresponding author: Jianhua Guo, Phone: + 61 7 3346 3222; FAX: + 61 7 3365 4726; E-mail:
6
[email protected] 7
# These authors contributed equally to this work.
8
9
ABSTRACT
10 11
Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) plays a crucial role in controlling the flux of methane from
12
anoxic environments. Sulfate-, nitrite-, nitrate-, and iron-dependent methane oxidation processes
13
have been considered to be responsible for the AOM activities in anoxic niches. Here, we report
14
that nitrate-reducing AOM microorganisms, enriched in a membrane biofilm bioreactor (MBfR),
15
are able to couple selenate reduction to AOM. According to ion chromatography (IC), X-ray
16
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and long-term bioreactor performance, we reveal that soluble
17
selenate was reduced to nanoparticle elemental selenium. High-throughput 16S rRNA gene
18
sequencing indicates that Candidatus Methanoperedens and Candidatus Methylomirabilis remained
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
19
the only known methane-oxidising microorganisms after nitrate was switched to selenate,
20
suggesting that these organisms could couple anaerobic methane oxidation to selenate reduction.
21
Our findings suggest a possible link between the biogeochemical selenium and methane cycles.
22
INTRODUCTION
23
Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, with a global warming potential 28 times that of carbon
24
dioxide over a 100-year horizon.1 Aerobic or anaerobic methane oxidation processes are the
25
dominant methane sinks to regulate methane concentration in the atmosphere, which is 1.8 ppm
26
currently.2-4 In particular, the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), mainly driven by anaerobic
27
methanotrophic (ANME) archaea, consumes 90% of methane produced in ocean sediments before it
28
enters the atmosphere.5 Sulfate-coupled AOM has been mostly studied, which is mediated by a
29
synergistic consortium between ANME archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB),5, 6 or by the
30
ANME alone (sulfate reduced to elemental sulfur by ANME directly).7 More recently, it was found
31
that AOM could also be coupled to denitrification, a process termed as denitrifying anaerobic
32
methane oxidation (DAMO). Two microorganisms have so far been found to be able to mediate
33
these reactions. Candidatus ‘Methanoperedens nitroreducens’, an archaeal DAMO organism
34
affiliated to the ANME-2d cluster, reduces nitrate to nitrite,8 while Candidatus ‘Methylomirabilis
35
oxyfera’, a bacterial DAMO organism affiliated to the NC10 phylum, reduces nitrite to dinitrogen
36
gas,9 both with methane as the electron donor. In addition, ANME archaea have also been reported
37
to be capable of utilizing iron or manganese10-12 and hexavalent chromium13 for anaerobic oxidation
38
of methane, suggesting that AOM can be coupled to a wide variety of electron acceptors. However,
39
to the best of our knowledge, there is no study to investigate whether ANME are able to couple
40
AOM to selenate reduction, which indicates a significant gap of our understanding in the dynamics
41
of anaerobic methane oxidation in nature given the wide distribution of selenium in virtually all
42
materials of the earth's crust.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 22
Page 3 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
43
Selenium (Se), a naturally occurring trace element, can be found in the Earth crust and minerals.14
44
Some anthropogenic activities, such as coal mining and combustion, metal mining and smelting, oil
45
refining and utilization, or agricultural irrigation.15 would increase Se concentrations in aquatic
46
ecosystems. Of considerable biological interest, Se constitutes one kind of necessary micronutrients
47
for human and other animals, but it is a toxic contaminant at excessive concentrations (a maximum
48
contaminant level of 50 µg total Se/L for drinking water was set by US EPA).16, 17 Previous studies
49
reported that selenate could be microbially reduced with acetate18, lactate19 or hydrogen20 as
50
electron donors. During the reduction process, inorganic selenate (SeO42-) and selenite (SeO32-),
51
both quite water-soluble and toxic, can be reduced to much less bioavailable and non-toxic
52
elemental selenium (Se0).21,
53
Enterobacter taylorae and Pelobacter seleniigenes) capable of selenate bio-reduction have been
54
detected or isolated in selenate-contaminated aquifer,23 agricultural drainage water24,
55
diversity of sediment types26, 27 (more details in SI Table S1), suggesting this dissimilatory process
56
be ubiquitous in natural environments. Although selenate could be organotrophic reduced using
57
organic carbon compounds or lithotrophic reduced using hydrogen as electron donors, selenate
58
reduction driven by methane has been largely overlooked so far. Considering that both methane and
59
selenate co-occur in aquatic environments, it is hypothesized that the microbial selenate-dependent
60
AOM process could occur in such environments.
61
Here, we attempted to demonstrate microbial selenate reduction coupled to the anaerobic oxidation
62
of methane. We enriched a culture able to couple selenate reduction to AOM by changing the
63
nitrate-containing feed to a reactor performing DAMO to selenate-containing feed. Ion
64
chromatography (IC), inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and X-
65
ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were employed to monitor the Se transformation. A series of
66
batch tests were also carried out to confirm the link between selenate reduction and AOM.
67
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing were
68
carried out to characterize the microbes involved.
22
Diverse microbial species (e.g. Dechloromonas sp., Thauera sp.,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
25
and a
Environmental Science & Technology
69
MATERIALS AND METHODS
70
Experimental Setup
71
Microbial selenate reduction coupled to anaerobic oxidation of methane was conducted using a
72
laboratory-scale MBfR reactor with a working volume of 800 mL (200 mm in height and 80 mm in
73
internal diameter). The schematic diagram of the MBfR system is similar with our previous studies
74
28, 29
75
diameter and 300 µm outer diameter, Mitsubishi, Japan) were inserted into the reactor evenly. Each
76
bundle was made up by 64 fibers with a length of 300 mm. These 512 fibers gave a membrane
77
surface area of 0.145 m2 and a membrane surface/reactor volume ratio of 181 m2/m3. Each bundle
78
of hollow fibers was bent to be U-shaped and the end was connected to a gas cylinder (95% CH4
79
and 5% CO2, Coregas, Australia), by which the methane can penetrate into the liquid phase from the
80
hollow fiber membrane. The methane pressure in the interior of hollow fibres was controlled using
81
a gas-pressure regulator (150 kPa, Ross Brown, Australia). The maximum CH4 flux was quantified
82
according to the previous method
83
18.8 L CH4/m2/d (12.5 g CH4/m2/d). The bulk medium in the MBfR was completely mixed with a
84
magnetic stirrer (500 rpm, Labtek, Australia) as well as a peristaltic recirculating pump (Masterflex,
85
USA). pH in the reactor was maintained between 7 and 8 by manual injection of 1 M HCl or 1 M
86
NaOH solutions. The reactor was operated in a temperature-controlled lab with temperature
87
maintained at 22±2 oC.
88
MBfR Operation
89
The MBfR was operated for 453 days divided into two phases, namely the nitrate-fed phase for the
90
enrichment of DAMO organisms in the biofilm (Phase I) and selenate-fed phase (Phase II), both
91
under anoxic conditions. For Phase I, a nitrate stock solution (3 M) was dosed weekly to reach 2-11
92
mmol/L nitrate after each injection. For Phase II, selenate was used to replace nitrate, and was
93
added weekly by injection of a concentrated stock solution (0.05 M) to reach an in-reactor selenate
(shown in SI Figure S1). Eight bundles of composite hollow fiber membranes (200 µm inner
30, 31
, and the maximum methane delivery capacity at 150 kPa was
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 22
Page 5 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
94
concentration of 20-60 µmol/L after each injection. The stock solutions were prepared with
95
degassed milli-Q water, and stored in sealed nitrogen-atmosphere bottles. In addition, 400 mL fresh
96
mineral medium was used to replace an equivalent volume of liquid in the reactor monthly. The
97
fresh medium consisted of (unit: g/L if not specified)32: KH2PO4 0.038, MgCl2.6H2O 0.008,
98
CaCl2.2H2O 0.015, NH4Cl 0.019, acidic trace elements (including FeSO4 2.085, ZnSO4.7H2O 0.068,
99
CoCl2.6H2O 0.12, MnCl2.4H2O 0.5, CuSO4.5H2O 0.32, NiCl2.6H2O 0.095, H3BO4 0.014, HCl 100
100
mM) 0.5 mL/L, and alkaline trace elements (including NaOH 0.4, NaWO4.2H2O 0.05, NaMoO4
101
0.242, SeO2 0.067) 0.2 mL/L.
102
During the whole experimental period, liquid samples were taken 2-3 times per week from the
103
reactor to determine the concentrations of nitrate, nitrite, selenate and selenite. Nitrate and selenate
104
reduction rates were determined as the slopes of the nitrate and selenate profiles, respectively.
105
Biofilm samples were collected for microbial analysis and XPS analysis in both phases on Day 271
106
and Day 442, respectively (see methods below).
107
Batch Tests
108
Batch tests were undertaken to observe selenate reduction in the presence or absence of methane.
109
Se(VI) reduction in the presence of methane was conducted to determine the stoichiometric electron
110
balance. To monitor the methane consumption, the reactor was disconnected from the gas cylinder
111
to cut off methane supply. Freshly prepared medium was sparged with methane gas (95% methane
112
and 5% carbon dioxide) for 60 min to make sure that the medium was saturated with methane. Then
113
the liquid phase of the MBfR was replaced and filled with this methane saturated liquid medium.
114
Afterwards, 1 mL of stock solution of selenate was injected into the reactor to obtain a
115
concentration of approximately 50.0 µmol/L. During the test for 64 h, liquid samples were taken
116
every 7h to 9h to determine concentrations of selenate and dissolved methane. To measure if
117
selenate would be reduced in the absence of methane, the methane gas cylinder was closed to stop
118
methane supply. Helium gas was flushed into the reactor through the hollow fibers to remove the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
119
residual methane for 30 min. Similarly, 1 mL of stock solution of selenate was injected into the
120
reactor. In addition, an abiotic control was also conducted to test if the selenate reduction is a
121
microbial process. A 200 mL serum bottle was used for the abiotic control experiment, where the
122
fresh medium was flushed with methane for 30 min to deliver dissolved methane. Similarly, 0.25
123
mL of stock solution of selenate was injected into the serum bottle to obtain a concentration of
124
approximately 60.0 µmol/L. The test was run for 48 h for both abiotic and without methane
125
conditions, during which liquid samples were taken every 7h to 11h to determine concentrations of
126
selenate as described below.
127
Chemical Analyses
128
Liquid samples of 2 mL were collected regularly (2-3 times per week) to measure the
129
concentrations of selenium species or nitrate after 0.22 µm-filtration. Selenate and selenite
130
concentrations were determined by ion chromatography (IC), which consisted of an AS-3000
131
Autosampler, a Dionex ICS-2100 equipped with an IonPac AS19 column (4 mm * 250 mm), an
132
ASRS suppressor (4 mm, 75 mA) and an electrochemical conductivity detector (ECD)16. For total
133
dissolved selenium, the sample was centrifuged at 15,000 g for 5 min, and analysed with
134
inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Perkin Elmer Optima
135
7300DV) after 10% nitric acid-assisted microwave digestion. The amount of elemental selenium
136
produced was calculated as the decrease of the total dissolved Se concentration. Nitrate
137
concentration was measured using a Lachat QuickChem8000 Flow Injection Analyzer (Lachat
138
Instrument, Milwaukee, WI). An Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a Supelco
139
6 feet * 1/8-in stainless steel packed column (HayeSep Q 80/100) and a flame ionisation detector
140
(FID) was employed to determine the dissolved methane concentration. The pH level in the reactor
141
was monitored using a pH meter (Oakton, Australia).
142
To analyse the valence state of selenium attached to the biofilm, the produced precipitate was
143
collected, freeze-dried and analysed with XPS. The XPS spectra were recorded on a Kratos Axis
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 22
Page 7 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
144
Ultra X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Manchester, UK) using a monochromatized Al Kα X-ray
145
(1486.6 eV) at 150 W.
146
DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
147
Biofilm samples were collected in both phases on Day 271 and Day 442, respectively. These
148
samples were analysed with 16S rRNA gene Illumina sequencing along with a biomass sample
149
from the inoculum. DNA extraction was conducted with the use of the FastDNA SPIN for Soil kit
150
(MP Biomedicals, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA
151
concentration was quantified with NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE,
152
USA). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the universal primer set 926F (5’-
153
AAACTYAAAKGAATTGACGG-3’) and 1392R (5’-ACGGGCGGTGTGTRC-3’). A QIAquick
154
PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) and a Quant-iT dsDNA HS assay kit (Invitrogen) were employed to
155
purify and quantify the PCR products, respectively. Amplicons were pooled in equimolar
156
concentration and sequenced with an Illumina sequencer based on the standard protocols.
157
Raw sequencing data were quality-filtered and de-multiplexed using Trimmomatic, with poor-
158
quality sequences trimmed and removed. Subsequently, high-quality sequences at 97% similarity
159
were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using QIIME with default parameters, and
160
representative OTU sequences were taxonomically BLASTed against Greengenes 16S rRNA
161
database. Finally, an OTU table consisting of the taxonomic classification and OTU representative
162
sequences was output as the main analysis results.
163
FISH
164
Biomass from the inoculum, and biofilm samples collected on Day 271 and Day 442 were harvested,
165
fixed, hybridized, and then visualized as described previously.33 The following probes were used in
166
this study: S-*-Darc-872-a-A-18 (5’-GGCTCCACCCGTTGTAGT-3’) for DAMO archaea, S-*-
167
NC10-1162-a-A-18 (5’-GCCTTCCTCCAGCTTGACGCTG-3’) for DAMO bacteria, S-*-Amx-
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
168
820-a-A-18 (5’-AAAACCCCTCTACTTAGTGCCC-3’) for anammox bacteria, and S-DArch-
169
0915-a-A-20 for general archaea, EUBmix for general bacteria.
170
171
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
172
Enriching DAMO Microorganisms in an MBfR Reactor
173
Methane has a very low solubility in water (22.7 mg/L, under 20 oC and 101.3 kPa) 34, which often
174
limits the DAMO rates in suspended cultures if methane is directly sparged into liquid.35 In order to
175
achieve a higher methane transfer efficiency, a lab-scale membrane biofilm bioreactor (MBfR) was
176
set up for the enrichment of DAMO in biofilm,36,
177
pressurized bubbleless hollow fibre membranes. The methane-based MBfR was seeded with 150
178
mL of inoculum taken from a parent DAMO/anammox reactor fed with nitrate, ammonium and
179
methane.8 At the seeding time, an average nitrate removal rate of 1.43 mmol/L/d was achieved in
180
the parent reactor, where DAMO archaea, DAMO bacteria and anammox bacteria were enriched in
181
the suspended culture (see the detailed microbial communities later). After the inoculation, nitrate
182
was provided in the liquid phase as the sole electron acceptor, and methane supplied through the
183
hollow fibre membrane to enrich DAMO microbes on the outer surface of the membrane.
184
With methane as the sole electron donor available, nitrate was reduced with a fluctuant reduction
185
rate in a range of 0.07-0.66 mmol/L/d, with an average of approximately 0.25 mmol/L/d during the
186
271 days of operation (Figure 1). Simultaneously, a layer of biofilm gradually covered the surface
187
of the hollow fiber membrane. In comparison with the parent reactor with a nitrate removal rate of
188
1.43 mmol/L/d, the lower nitrate reduction rate could have possibly resulted from the washout of
189
anammox bacteria (as will be detailed below) due to the absence of ammonium as a substrate for
190
anammox. It has previously been reported that a partnership with anammox bacteria favours the
37
where methane was delivered from the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 22
Page 9 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
191
growth of archaeal DAMO,8 because anammox bacteria could remove nitrite, which is toxic to
192
archaeal DAMO.38
193
Achieving Microbial Selenate Reduction Coupled to AOM
194
On Day 272, the sole electron acceptor provided to the MBfR was switched from nitrate to selenate,
195
in order to investigate if the microbial community enriched could couple selenate reduction to the
196
anaerobic oxidation of methane. Selenate reduction immediately occurred, and continued in the
197
remaining 182 days of the experimental period (Figure 2). Selenate was reduced with a fluctuant
198
reduction rate of 2.8-12.4 µmol/L/d. Even without any adaptation, the enriched culture reduced
199
selenate from 63.3 µmol/L on Day 272 to 4.5 µmol/L on Day 289. Selenite was not detected in the
200
reactor, suggesting that all the selenate should be converted to elemental Se. This can be supported
201
by attachment of reddish precipitates in the biofilm and the recirculation tubing. In order to
202
investigate the speciation of selenium deposited onto the MBfR biofilm surface after microbial
203
selenate reduction, XPS spectra of the selenate-reducing biofilm and the inoculum were both
204
collected (Figure 3). In comparison with the inoculum, there was a distinct peak appearing around
205
55.4 eV of binding energy (BE) from the selenate-intervened biofilm sample, which could be
206
assigned to elemental Se according to the NIST XPS Database. Furthermore, this peak can be
207
resolved into two sub-peaks, i.e. elemental Se 3d3/2 (BE 56.3eV) and elemental Se 3d5/2 (BE 55.4
208
eV). The XPS spectra indicate that the main selenium component of the precipitate deposited onto
209
the methane-based MBfR biofilm during microbial selenate reduction was elemental Se, suggesting
210
complete selenate bio-reduction to elemental Se without the biological absorption of selenate or the
211
produced selenite and selenide. Similarly, elemental Se was previously shown to be the only
212
product of microbial selenate reduction when acetate or lactate was used as an electron donor.18, 39,
213
40
214
microorganims,41 although the formation of selenide from elemental Se is a slow reaction.42
It is also worth noting that elemental Se was reported to be further reduced to selenide by specific
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
215
During the first 30 days after selenate dosing was initiated, the culture underwent an adaptation to
216
selenate loading and exhibited a selenate reduction rate of only about 4 µmol/L/d. Later, the
217
reduction rate rapidly increased to ~12 µmol/L/d, which lasted for more than 40 days, before it
218
gradually declined to the final rate of 7.5 µmol/L/d. Based on the flux calculation (see SI), the
219
required methane flux for selenate reduction (8.2×10-4 g/m2/d) was significantly less than the
220
maximum CH4 flux (12.5 g/m2/d), indicating that the supply of methane was not a rate-limiting step.
221
The rate decline herein could potentially be attributed to an adverse impact caused by the
222
continuous attachment of the produced reddish elemental Se precipitates onto the biofilm, as the
223
precipitates may hinder substrate transfer of selenate to microbes in biofilm, or bind with
224
extracellular polymeric substances on the cytomembrane.
225
To determine whether the selenate reduction was coupled to methane oxidation, a batch test was
226
conducted where the methane delivery was stopped through disconnecting the gas cylinder to the
227
reactor. In the absence of methane, no significant selenate was reduced (SI Figure S2, p >0.05). In
228
contrast, selenate was reduced when methane was available as electron donor. The mole ratio
229
between Se(VI) reduction and methane oxidation was about 0.86 according to the data of Fig. S2a
230
(SI). This measured ratio was comparable to the theoretical value of 1.33 (4SeO42- + 3CH4 + 8H+ →
231
4Se0 + 3CO2 + 10H2O). Moreover, an abiotic experiment further confirmed the lack of selenate
232
reduction in the absence of microbes, indicating that the selenate reduction process was a microbial
233
process. The long-term performance data along with the batch test results provide evidence that
234
selenate reduction might be coupled to AOM. Further isotopic labelling experiments using labelled
235
methane and selenate should be performed to verify this coupling process.
236
Microbial Community Structure and Potential Players in Selenate Bio-reduction
237
Molecular characterization of microbial community in inoculum, nitrate-reducing biofilm and
238
selenate-shaped biofilm were conducted using FISH and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.
239
Based on FISH results, M. nitroreducens, M. oxyfera and anammox bacteria were the dominant
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 22
Page 11 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
240
microorganisms in the inoculum (Figure 4a). The anammox population could hardly be detected in
241
the nitrate-reducing (Day 271, Figure 4b) or selenate-reducing (Day 442, Figure 4c) biofilms. Both
242
M. nitroreducens and M. oxyfera remained as the dominating groups.
243
Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences (Figure 5) further confirmed that all archaea
244
detected in the inoculum or the biofilms fell within one genus of Candidatus Methanoperedens,
245
which are known archaeal DAMO organisms that perform nitrate-driven anaerobic methane
246
oxidation. Candidatus Methylomirabilis, a known bacterial DAMO organism, was also detected
247
with a high abundance in both inoculum and biofilms. Anammox bacteria were washed out from the
248
reactor, which is consistent with the FISH results. After nitrate was replaced with selenate, both
249
Candidatus Methanoperedens (15.7%) and Candidatus Methylomirabilis (12.5%) were still the
250
dominant microorganisms. Analysis of all 16S rRNA gene sequences further suggests Candidatus
251
Methanoperedens and Candidatus Methylomirabilis were the only known methane-oxidising
252
microbes in the reactor after 442-day operation. Other known selenate-reducing microorganisms
253
such as Sulfurospirillum barnesii 43, Bacillus sp.39 and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia40 (SI Table
254
S1) were not present in the reactor.
255
Compared to the communities in the nitrate-reducing biofilm, the abundance of SHA-31 and
256
Ignavibacterium increased from 4.3% to 11.9% and from 4.9% to 8.8%, respectively, after selenate
257
replaced nitrate as the electron acceptor. The phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA genes of SHA-31 was
258
established in comparison with phylogenetically close sequences from various environments (as
259
shown in SI Figure S3). None of these phylogenetically related microorganisms have previously
260
been shown to be able to reduce selenate. Similarly, there have been no reports indicating that
261
Ignavibacterium has the ability to reduce selenate.44, 45 These two genera in the reactor are therefore
262
unlikely selenate reducers. Their roles remain to be clarified.
263
Possible Roles of Candidatus Methanoperedens and Candidatus Methylomirabilis
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
264
In the present study, we reported that an enriched DAMO culture could couple methane oxidation
265
with selenate reduction. Previous studies suggested that genes encoding heme c-containing proteins
266
(c-type cytochromes) could be a genetic basis for metal reduction, which could shuttle electrons
267
from the cell to soluble or solid electron acceptors.11, 46, 47 Here, we searched the reconstructed
268
genome of Candidatus Methanoperedens and found 28 genes encoding heme c-type cytochromes in
269
the Candidatus Methanoperedens (SI Table S2). The result is consistent with a very recent report
270
about the enriched ANME-2d, which encoded 41 multiheme c-type cytochromes.11 This genomic
271
information indicates that Candidatus Methanoperedens should possess versatile abilities to use a
272
range of electron acceptors according to their availability. Previous studies have demonstrated that
273
anaerobic methanotrophic archaea coupled to sulfate6, nitrite9, nitrate8 and iron/manganese10
274
reduction. In addition, Candidatus Methylomirabilis, which are known DAMO bacteria,9 were
275
detected in the bioreactor community. By searching its genetic information,9 we also found genes
276
encoding heme c-type cytochromes in the reconstructed genome of Candidatus Methylomirbilis,
277
suggesting its potential capability of extracellular electron transfer. However, no studies have been
278
reported that Candidatus Methylomirbilis is able to utilize electron acceptors other than nitrite.
279
Without the involvement of any other known electron acceptors (e.g. sulphate, iron or manganese)
280
for ANME in the reactor, we assumed that Candidatus Methanoperedens or Candidatus
281
Methylomirabilis oxidized methane to generate the electrons for selenate reduction. Similar to
282
nitrate, selenate might serve as the terminal electron acceptor for independent AOM driven by
283
DAMO archaea via a reverse methanogenesis pathway8. In addition, the ANME groups responsible
284
for AOM are commonly reported to assemble with synergistic bacterial partners for sulphate5 or
285
iron/manganese10,
286
organic intermediates (e.g. volatile fatty acids29) under certain conditions, then which might be
287
served as carbon sources for heterotrophically reducing selenate. Future studies are required to
288
investigate whether the DAMO co-cultures independently couple anaerobic methane oxidation with
12
reduction. It is also suspected that DAMO microorganisms might generate
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 22
Page 13 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
289
selenate reduction or the enriched DAMO cultures (or other unknown methanotrophs) cooperate
290
with other unidentified selenate reducers.
291
Environmental Implications
292
AOM plays an important role in the global methane cycle, with sulfate-, nitrite/nitrate-, and
293
iron/manganese-dependent AOMs considered to significantly impact the methane flux from anoxic
294
environments.6, 8-10 However, no study has been dedicated to investigating anaerobic oxidation of
295
methane coupled to selenate reduction. Selenium compounds are ubiquitous in the Earth crust and
296
minerals14, and have been discharged into aquatic ecosystems15, inducing biological and ecological
297
effects. Previous studies have reported that selenate could be heterotrophically reduced with various
298
organic compounds as electron donors in selenate-contaminated aquifer23, agricultural drainage
299
water24 and/or wetland sediment48. Herein, for the first time, we demonstrate that the microbial
300
selenate reduction could be coupled to AOM. Considering the wide distribution of methane and the
301
very likely coexistence of methane and selenate in aquatic environments, the selenate-dependent
302
AOM process could play a role in methane regulation on Earth. Our results advance our
303
understanding of the biogeochemical selenium and methane cycles, and of the diversity of
304
microbially mediated selenate reduction in natural environments. Our results may also support the
305
development of alternative technologies for selenate removal from selenate-contaminated aquatic
306
environments such as groundwater.
307
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
308
This work was financially supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) through the
309
projects DP170104038 and DE130101401. Jing-Huan Luo would like to acknowledge the China
310
Scholarship Council (CSC) for the scholarship support. Hui Chen would like to acknowledge the
311
support of the International Postgraduate Research Scholarship (IPRS) and The University of
312
Queensland Centennial Scholarship (UQCent).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
313
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
314
Supporting information
315
Additional methods, tables and figures as mentioned in the text. This material is available free of
316
charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 22
Page 15 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
317
REFERENCES
318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369
(1) Pachauri, R. K.; Allen, M. R.; Barros, V. R.; Broome, J.; Cramer, W.; Christ, R.; Church, J. A.; Clarke, L.; Dahe, Q.; Dasgupta, P., Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, 2014. (2) Ciais, P.; Sabine, C.; Bala, G.; Bopp, L.; Brovkin, V.; Canadell, J.; Chhabra, A.; DeFries, R.; Galloway, J.; Heimann, M., Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press: 2014; pp 465-570. (3) Degelmann, D. M.; Borken, W.; Drake, H. L.; Kolb, S., Different atmospheric methane-oxidizing communities in European beech and Norway spruce soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76 (10), 32283235. (4) Maxfield, P. J.; Hornibrook, E. R. C.; Evershed, R. P., Estimating high-affinity methanotrophic bacterial biomass, growth, and turnover in soil by phospholipid fatty acid C-13 labeling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72 (6), 3901-3907. (5) Knittel, K.; Boetius, A., Anaerobic oxidation of methane: progress with an unknown process. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 311-334. (6) Boetius, A.; Ravenschlag, K.; Schubert, C. J.; Rickert, D.; Widdel, F.; Gieseke, A.; Amann, R.; Jorgensen, B. B.; Witte, U.; Pfannkuche, O., A marine microbial consortium apparently mediating anaerobic oxidation of methane. Nature 2000, 407 (6804), 623-626. (7) Milucka, J.; Ferdelman, T. G.; Polerecky, L.; Franzke, D.; Wegener, G.; Schmid, M.; Lieberwirth, I.; Wagner, M.; Widdel, F.; Kuypers, M. M. M., Zero-valent sulphur is a key intermediate in marine methane oxidation. Nature 2012, 491 (7425), 541-546. (8) Haroon, M. F.; Hu, S. H.; Shi, Y.; Imelfort, M.; Keller, J.; Hugenholtz, P.; Yuan, Z. G.; Tyson, G. W., Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage. Nature 2013, 500 (7464), 567-570. (9) Ettwig, K. F.; Butler, M. K.; Le Paslier, D.; Pelletier, E.; Mangenot, S.; Kuypers, M. M. M.; Schreiber, F.; Dutilh, B. E.; Zedelius, J.; de Beer, D.; Gloerich, J.; Wessels, H. J. C. T.; van Alen, T.; Luesken, F.; Wu, M. L.; van de Pas-Schoonen, K. T.; den Camp, H. J. M. O.; Janssen-Megens, E. M.; Francoijs, K. J.; Stunnenberg, H.; Weissenbach, J.; Jetten, M. S. M.; Strous, M., Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature 2010, 464 (7288), 543-548. (10) Beal, E. J.; House, C. H.; Orphan, V. J., Manganese- and iron-dependent marine methane oxidation. Science 2009, 325 (5937), 184-187. (11) Ettwig, K. F.; Zhu, B. L.; Speth, D.; Keltjens, J. T.; Jetten, M. S. M.; Kartal, B., Archaea catalyze iron-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2016, 113 (45), 12792-12796. (12) Fu, L.; Li, S. W.; Ding, Z. W.; Ding, J.; Lu, Y. Z.; Zeng, R. J., Iron reduction in the DAMO/Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 coculture system and the fate of Fe(II). Water Res. 2016, 88, 808-815. (13) Lu, Y.-Z.; Fu, L.; Ding, J.; Ding, Z.-W.; Li, N.; Zeng, R. J., Cr (VI) reduction coupled with anaerobic oxidation of methane in a laboratory reactor. Water Res. 2016, 102, 445-452. (14) Simmons, D. B. D.; Wallschlager, D., A critical review of the biogeochemistry and ecotoxicology of selenium in lotic and lentic environments. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24 (6), 1331-1343. (15) Lemly, A. D., Aquatic selenium pollution is a global environmental safety issue. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2004, 59 (1), 44-56. (16) Lenz, M.; Gmerek, A.; Lens, P. N. L., Selenium speciation in anaerobic granular sludge. Int. J. Environ. An. Ch. 2006, 86 (9), 615-627. (17) Vickerman, D. B.; Trumble, J. T.; George, G. N.; Pickering, I. J.; Nichol, H., Selenium biotransformations in an insect ecosystem: Effects of insects on phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38 (13), 3581-3586. (18) Navarro, R. R.; Aoyagi, T.; Kimura, M.; Koh, H.; Sato, Y.; Kikuchi, Y.; Ogata, A.; Hori, T., Highresolution dynamics of microbial communities during dissimilatory selenate reduction in anoxic soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (13), 7684-7691. (19) Lenz, M.; Enright, A. M.; O'Flaherty, V.; van Aelst, A. C.; Lens, P. N. L., Bioaugmentation of UASB reactors with immobilized Sulfurospirillum barnesii for simultaneous selenate and nitrate removal. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2009, 83 (2), 377-388.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425
(20) Lai, C. Y.; Yang, X. E.; Tang, Y. N.; Rittmann, B. E.; Zhao, H. P., Nitrate shaped the selenatereducing microbial community in a hydrogen-based biofilm reactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (6), 3395-3402. (21) Chung, J.; Nerenberg, R.; Rittmann, B. E., Bioreduction of selenate using a hydrogen-based membrane biofilm reactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (5), 1664-1671. (22) Lenz, M.; Van Hullebusch, E. D.; Hommes, G.; Corvini, P. F. X.; Lens, P. N. L., Selenate removal in methanogenic and sulfate-reducing upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactors. Water Res. 2008, 42 (8-9), 21842194. (23) Williams, K. H.; Wilkins, M. J.; N'Guessan, A. L.; Arey, B.; Dodova, E.; Dohnalkova, A.; Holmes, D.; Lovley, D. R.; Long, P. E., Field evidence of selenium bioreduction in a uranium-contaminated aquifer. Env. Microbiol. Rep. 2013, 5 (3), 444-452. (24) Zhang, Y. Q.; Zahir, Z. A.; Frankenberger, W. T., Factors affecting reduction of selenate to elemental selenium in agricultural drainage water by Enterobacter taylorae. J. Agr. Food. Chem. 2003, 51 (24), 70737078. (25) Oremland, R. S.; Steinberg, N. A.; Presser, T. S.; Miller, L. G., In Situ Bacterial Selenate Reduction in the Agricultural Drainage Systems of Western Nevada. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57 (2), 615-617. (26) Narasingarao, P.; Häggblom, M. M., Pelobacter seleniigenes sp. nov., a selenate-respiring bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr. 2007, 57 (9), 1937-1942. (27) Steinberg, N. A.; Oremland, R. S., Dissimilatory Selenate Reduction Potentials in a Diversity of Sediment Types. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56 (11), 3550-3557. (28) Luo, J.-H.; Wu, M.; Yuan, Z.; Guo, J., Biological Bromate Reduction Driven by Methane in a Membrane Biofilm Reactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2017, 4 (12), 562-566. (29) Luo, J.-H.; Chen, H.; Yuan, Z.; Guo, J., Methane-supported nitrate removal from groundwater in a membrane biofilm reactor. Water Res. 2018, 132, 71-78. (30) Ontiveros-Valencia, A.; Penton, C. R.; Krajmalnik-Brown, R.; Rittmann, B. E., Hydrogen-Fed Biofilm Reactors Reducing Selenate and Sulfate: Community Structure and Capture of Elemental Selenium Within the Biofilm. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016, 113 (8), 1736-1744. (31) Tang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Marcus, A. K.; Krajmalnik-Brown, R.; Rittmann, B. E., A steady-state biofilm model for simultaneous reduction of nitrate and perchlorate, part 2: parameter optimization and results and discussion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (3), 1608-15. (32) Ettwig, K. F.; van Alen, T.; van de Pas-Schoonen, K. T.; Jetten, M. S.; Strous, M., Enrichment and molecular detection of denitrifying methanotrophic bacteria of the NC10 phylum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75 (11), 3656-62. (33) Ettwig, K. F.; Shima, S.; van de Pas-Schoonen, K. T.; Kahnt, J.; Medema, M. H.; op den Camp, H. J. M.; Jetten, M. S. M.; Strous, M., Denitrifying bacteria anaerobically oxidize methane in the absence of Archaea. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10 (11), 3164-3173. (34) Mackay, D.; Shiu, W. Y., A critical review of Henry’s law constants for chemicals of environmental interest. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1981, 10 (4), 1175-1199. (35) Hu, S. H.; Zeng, R. J.; Keller, J.; Lant, P. A.; Yuan, Z. G., Effect of nitrate and nitrite on the selection of microorganisms in the denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidation process. Env. Microbiol. Rep. 2011, 3 (3), 315-319. (36) Shi, Y.; Hu, S. H.; Lou, J. Q.; Lu, P. L.; Keller, J.; Yuan, Z. G., Nitrogen Removal from Wastewater by Coupling Anammox and Methane-Dependent Denitrification in a Membrane Biofilm Reactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (20), 11577-11583. (37) Cai, C.; Hu, S. H.; Guo, J. H.; Shi, Y.; Xie, G. J.; Yuan, Z. G., Nitrate reduction by denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidizing microorganisms can reach a practically useful rate. Water Res. 2015, 87, 211217. (38) Hu, S. H.; Zeng, R. J.; Haroon, M. F.; Keller, J.; Lant, P. A.; Tyson, G. W.; Yuan, Z. G., A laboratory investigation of interactions between denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidation (DAMO) and anammox processes in anoxic environments. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5 (8706), 1-9. (39) Fujita, M.; Ike, M.; Kashiwa, M.; Hashimoto, R.; Soda, S., Laboratory-scale continuous reactor for soluble selenium removal using selenate-reducing bacterium, Bacillus sp SF-1. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 80 (7), 755-761. (40) Dungan, R. S.; Yates, S. R.; Frankenberger, W. T., Transformations of selenate and selenite by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolated from a seleniferous agricultural drainage pond sediment. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 5 (4), 287-295.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 22
Page 17 of 22
426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448
Environmental Science & Technology
(41) Herbel, M. J.; Blum, J. S.; Oremland, R. S.; Borglin, S. E., Reduction of Elemental Selenium to Selenide: Experiments with Anoxic Sediments and Bacteria that Respire Se-Oxyanions. Geomicrobiol. J. 2003, 20 (6), 587-602. (42) Zehr, J. P.; Oremland, R. S., Reduction of Selenate to Selenide by Sulfate-Respiring Bacteria: Experiments with Cell Suspensions and Estuarine Sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987, 53 (6), 13651369. (43) Oremland, R. S.; Blum, J. S.; Culbertson, C. W.; Visscher, P. T.; Miller, L. G.; Dowdle, P.; Strohmaier, F. E., Isolation, Growth, and Metabolism of an Obligately Anaerobic, Selenate-Respiring Bacterium, Strain SES-. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60 (8), 3011-3019. (44) Iino, T.; Mori, K.; Uchino, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Harayama, S.; Suzuki, K., Ignavibacterium album gen. nov., sp nov., a moderately thermophilic anaerobic bacterium isolated from microbial mats at a terrestrial hot spring and proposal of Ignavibacteria classis nov., for a novel lineage at the periphery of green sulfur bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr. 2010, 60, 1376-1382. (45) Liu, Z. F.; Frigaard, N. U.; Vogl, K.; Iino, T.; Ohkuma, M.; Overmann, J.; Bryant, D. A., Complete genome of Ignavibacterium album, a metabolically versatile, flagellated, facultative anaerobe from the phylum Chlorobi. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 185. (46) Shi, L.; Squier, T. C.; Zachara, J. M.; Fredrickson, J. K., Respiration of metal (hydr)oxides by Shewanella and Geobacter: a key role for multihaem c-type cytochromes. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 65 (1), 1220. (47) Weber, K. A.; Achenbach, L. A.; Coates, J. D., Microorganisms pumping iron: anaerobic microbial iron oxidation and reduction. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4 (10), 752-764. (48) Narasingarao, P.; Haggblom, M. M., Identification of anaerobic selenate-respiring bacteria from aquatic sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73 (11), 3519-3527.
449
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Nitrate removal rate (mmol/L/d)
Nitrate/nitrite concentration (mmol/L)
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 18 of 22
12 Nitrate Nitrite
a
9 6 3 0 0.8 0.6
b
0.4 0.2 0.0 0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
Time (d)
Figure 1. (a) Nitrate and nitrite concentrations, and (b) Nitrate reduction rate in Phase I. Nitrate was periodically fed to the reactor resulting in sudden increases in its concentration. The nitrate reduction rate was calculated as the slope of the concentration profile following each pulse-feed of nitrate.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Selenate reduction rate ( µmol/L/d)
Selenate/selenite/Se concentration ( µmol/L)
Page 19 of 22
64 Selenate Selenite Elemental Se
a
48 32 16 0 16
b
12 8 4 0 280
300
320
340
360
380
400
420
440
460
Time (d) Figure 2. (a) Selenate, selenite and elemental Se concentrations, and (b) Selenate reduction rate in Phase II. Selenate was periodically fed to the reactor resulting in sudden increases in its concentration. The selenate reduction rate was calculated as the slope of the concentration profile following each pulse-feed of selenate.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 20 of 22
Relative intensity (count)
800
Inoculum
700
Peak sum Elemental Se 3d3/2
600
Elemental Se 3d5/2 500
Selenate-reducing biofilm 400 60
58
56
54
52
50
Binding energy (eV)
Figure 3. Se XPS high-resolution spectra of the selenate-reducing biofilm and the inoculum. Compared to inoculum, the selenate-reducing biofilm exhibits a distinct peak sum of elemental Se (BE 55.4 eV), which can be further resolved into elemental Se 3d3/2 (BE 56.3eV) and elemental Se 3d5/2 (BE 55.4 eV).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 4. FISH micrographs of the (a) inoculum, (b) nitrate-reducing biofilm (Day 271) and (c) selenate-reducing biofilm (Day 442) showing predominant M. nitroreducens (green) in glomerate clusters, M. oxyfera (red) and anammox bacteria (blue) in scattered clusters. Specific probes for hybridization: Cy3 ARC872 for M. nitroreducens, Cy5 NC1162 for M. oxyfera, and FITC AMX820 for anammox bacteria.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 5. Relative genus-level abundance of dominating organisms in the microbial community in the nitrate and selenate bio-reduction phases compared to the inoculum. The relative abundance is defined as a percentage in total effective microbial sequences in a sample. Genera with an abundance of >=1% in at least one sample are presented.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 22