Mixture densities of aqueous potassium chloride with sodium chloride

Experimental Sound Speeds and Derived Compressibilities of the KCl (1) + CaCl2 (2) + Water (3) and KCl (1) + MgCl2 (2) + Water (3) Systems up to an Io...
0 downloads 0 Views 244KB Size
J. Chem. Eng. Data l988,33, 198-199

198

Table 111. C, Rstio for the CH,-COz Mixture at 325.2 K press., bar 6.89 10.34 13.79 17.24 20.68 24.13 27.58 31.02 34.47

CmrJCiamm

exptl 1.021 1.033 1.046 1.060 1.073 1.087 1.102 1.116 1.132

SRK 1.023 1.035 1.047 1.060 1.074 1.088 1.102 1.117 1.133

-.- I

press., bar 37.92 41.37 44.81 48.26 51.71 55.16 58.60 59.98 62.05

Cmw/C~,am

exptl 1.147 1.164 1.180 1.198 1.216 1.235 1.255 1.263 1.275

SRK 1.149 1.166 1.184 1.202 1.221 1.241 1.261 1.269 1.282 I

104

1

0.5

7-

W

5

0 '

U

P 0

I

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 PRESSURE (kPa)

Flgure 2. Percentage difference between experimental and SRK-

predicted C, ratios.

one temperaturaindependent binary interaction parameter in the attractive term. The value (kl,= 0.0933) was obtained from a compilation by Knapp et ai. ( 7 7 ) based on vapor-liquid equilibria (VLE). The expressions given by Reid et al (12) for the ideal-gas heat capacity, C, *, of methane and carbon dioxide were combined according to the mole fractions of each to give C, * for the mixture. This value was set equal to CPtat"as required in eq 2, without correction. The results of the SRK calculations are shown in Tables 1-111 and in Figure 2. The difference plot shows that agreement with the experimental results is quite good. At the lowest pressures, where the precision of the experimental data is poorest because the C, ratio is near unity, the differences resutt from scatter in the experimental data. At high pressures the agreement is excellent and withln experimental emor for much of the pressure range even though a k! based on VLE data was used for the heat-capacity predictions. Regression of these experimental heat-capacity data for a special k,/ would result in a fit that is well within experimental error even at 62 bar. However, the preferred procedure for fitting any equations of state and mixing rules would be the regression of P-V-Tand VLE data along with the heat-capacity data (73). Reglotry NO. CH,, 74-82-8;COS, 124-38-9

Llterature Cited

the C, ratio was greater for a lower temperature isotherm. The uncertainty in the data is approximatety 0.6% over most of the pressure range. Only at heat-capacity ratios less than about 1.05 does the uncertainty in temperature-dlfference measurements lead to larger overall uncertainties.

(1) Workman, E. J. phvs. Rev. 1930,38,1083. (2) Workman, E. J. M y s . Rev. 1031,37, 1345. (3) Baleban, S. M.; Wenzel, L. A. Ind. €ng. Chem. F u n d " 1070, 9 , 568. (4) Bishnoi, P. R.; Robinson, D. B. J . Basic Eng.; Trans. A . S . M . E . 1972, 757. (5) Bishnoi, P. R.; Robinson, D. B. Can. J . Chem. Eng. 1971,49. 657. (6) Bishnoi, P. R.; Hamalluk, G. P.; Robinson, D. B. Can. J . Chem. €ng.

Dlscusslon

For pwposes of comparison, the C, ratios of the test mixture were calculated by applying the Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) EOS (70)to the rigorous thermodynamic equation

1072. 50,677. (7) Hamaliuk, G. P.; Bishnoi, P. R.; Robinson, D. B. J . Chem Eng. Data 1974, 10, 78. (8) Boulton, J. R. M.S. Thesis, Lehlgh University; Bethlehem, PA, 1986. (9) Baleban, S.M. Ph.D.Thesis, Lehlgh University, Bethlehem, PA, 1966. (10) Soave, G. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1072,27, 1197. (11) Knapp, H.; Doring, R.; Oelklch, L.; Plocker, U.; Preusnh, J. M. VaporLiquid Equilibrie for Mixtures of Low Boiling Substances ; DECHEMA:

Frankfurt/Maln, lS82;p 773. (12) ReM, R. C.; Sherwood, T. K.; Prausnitz, J. M. The Prol)erties of Gases andLiqulds; m a w - H i l l : New York, 1977;Appendix A. (13) NaMrl, T.; Mathiis, P. M.; Copeman, T. W. "Impact of Calorimetry on Process Design", presented at 42nd Annual Calorimetry Conference, Boulder, CO, July 26-31, 1987.

The mixing rules suggested by Soave (10)were used along with

Received for review November 26, 1986. Accepted December 30, 1987.

Mixture Debmlties of Aqueous KCI with NaCl up to Ionic Strength 4.5 mol kg-' and at 298.15 K Ant1 Kumar Department of Sugar Chemistty, Deccen Sugar Institute, Manjari (Bk) 412 307, Poona, India

lor The exper'menta' d*mlty aqueous mixtures of KCI with NaCl at 298.15 K from the lonlc I 0'5-4*5 mol kg-' The result6 are fltted to the equation, derived by Patwardhan and Kurnar (equivalent to Young's rule) and by Pitter. The Intoracths between Na' and K', as shown by the excess volumes, AV,, are vow small.

experimental density differences for aqueous KCI-NaCI at 298.15 K. Wirth (3) and MiUero and Sotolongo (4) have also reported the densities of this system, but their measurements were r&pJed to the strength, I , of 1.5 kg-1 of water. This article reports the experimental density differences, Ad, for this system at constant I = 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4.5 mol kg-', ranging from pure KCI to pure NaCl solutions.

I ntroductlon

Experhental Sectlon

I n contlnuation of our work on the volume properties of concentrated electrolyte mixtures ( 1 , 2), we now present the

Both KCI and NaCl from BDH (AR Grade), dried in an oven, were directly used for preparing the stock and starting solutions.

0021-958818811733-0198$01.50/0

0 1988 American Chemical Society

Journal of Chemlcal and Engineering Data, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1988 199 Table I. Experimental Density Differences, Ad (g cm"), for Aqueous KCl-NaCl at 298.15 K YN.~

o.ooO0 0.0466 0.1522 0.2886 0.3919

1 0 3 ~ dB, cm-3 I = 0.5 mol 22.721 22.582 22.321 21.967 21.705

.YN.Cl

10aAd,B

kg-l 0.5253 0.6462 0.7626 0.8731 1.oooO

21.350 21.041 20.702 20.434 20.102

=

44.294 43.720 43.182 42.490 41.860

O.oo00

84.472 83.260 82.208 81.148 79.854

0.5731 0.6533 0.7825 0.9021 1.0000

41.309 40.892 40.219 39.599 39.083

Z = 2 mol kg-I 0.1283 0.2395 0.3537 0.4902

78.874 77.770 76.560 75.884 75.060

0.5951 0.7114 0.8398 0.9128 1.oooo

J

(Io3YJ+

I = 3 mol kg-l

O.oo00 0.1435 0.2957 0.4098

121.265 119.430 117.499 116.045

0.0000 0.1341 0.2594 0.3995 0.5114

171.039 188.809 166.749 164.420 162.561

0.5710 0.6995 0.8531 1.oooo

J

113.986 112.349 110.384 108.519 160.220 158.141 155.908 154.473

Solutions were made by dissolving a definite mass in deionized water. The concentrations of solutions were determined by gravimetric method using AgNO, solution. The density differences (Ad = d - d o )were measured with a Paar densimeter with a precision of f 3 X lo4 g cm4. d and d o are the densities of solution and pure water (0.997 047 g cm-, at 298.15 K), respectively. The constant temperature thermostat bath was maintained to f0.005 K. The methods of calibration and experimentationare discussed elsewhere (5). Resutts and Mscusslon Table Ilists the measures A d values as a function of ionic strength fraction of NaCl (ykcl= m k c l / Z ; m = molality) at constant Z's of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4.5 mol kg-' of water. The earlier measurements of Wirth (3)could not be compared, as his data were neither at constant ionic strength nor at constant ionic strength fraction. Millero and Sotolongo (4) measured densities at Z = 1.5 mol kg-'. Our data, when interpolated to 1.5, gave good agreement with their data. Mean apparent molal volumes, 4 of mixtures can be calculated by using the relation

4* = M T / d - [ 103(d- d o ) / d d o C m J ] J

(Io3YJ+ m&fJ)/dJo)

(2)

J

(3)

A V m can be easily fitted to the equation ( 7 7 )

Z = 4.5 mol kg-' 0.8530 0.7789 0.9132 1.oooo

"J)/(CJ

dJois density of Jth electrolyte at the ionic strength of mixture. The average standard deviation of fit for A d by using eq 2 from I = 0.5 to 4.5 mol kg-' is 0.085 X IO3 g cm-,. The author has demonstrated the applicability of the Pitzer theory (9)in predicting the densities of electrolyte mixtures ( 7, 2). After the pure electrolyte P%zerparameters are obtained, the approach of the mixture calculations Is essentially a Young's rule (8)approach. Thus, with the use of Pitzer parameters for aqueous KCI (2) and aqueous NaCi ( l o ) ,one obtains almost the same standard deviations of fit as obtained by the use of eq 2. The system of the Pnzer equations and method of caC culations are discussed in our earlier work ( 7 , 2). The excess volumes of mixing, AV,, may be obtained as

I = 1 mol kg-I 0.0000 0.1098 0.2135 0.3454 0.4653

(7) account for the interactions between the ions of opposite charges and neglect any interactions due to like charge ions. Thus, their equations follow the famous Young's rule (8). Their equation for estimating density of mixture is

(1)

where

MJ and mJ are the molecular weight and molality respectively of dissolved Jth electrolyte. The mixture densities, d , can be easily fitted to the equation of Patwardhan and Kumar (6).Their basic equations for activity and osmotic coefficients of aqueous mixed electrolyte solutions

Equation 4 is analogous to the equation for correlating AH,,, or AGm with RTh,, RTh, or RTg, and RTg, parameters of heats and free energy of mixing respectively (72). I n eq 4, v o and v 1 indicate the binary (Na', K)' and ternary (Na', K,' Cl-) interactions. The value of vo was found to be constant with Z and was 0.0420 f 0.0037 from I = 0.5 to 4.5 mol kg-' of water. This small magnitude indicates very weak interactions between Na' and K+ ions, which Is also supported by heats of mixing data ( 72). The ternary interaction parameter v was negligible for this system. In the ~ i t z e rtheory (91, the binary mixing term 0; used in the volumetric equation is the pressure derivative of binary mixing term & of the activity coefficient expression. 0: (i = K,' k = Na'), which can be obtained from the equation dkcussed in our earlier work ( 7, 2),is related with v o of eq 4. The relationship between 0; and v o as simplified for the mixtures of 1-1 electrolytes with common ion is

0L = v 0 / 2 R T where R = 83.1441 cm3 mol bar-' K-' and Tis in kelvin. The value of thus is 8.47 f 0.07 x IO-'. Registry No. NaCI, 7647-14-5; KCI. 7447-40-7.

Literature Cited (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (8) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)

(12)

Kumar, A. Can. J. Chem. 1985, 63, 3200. Kumar, A. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1986, 3 1 , 21. Wlrth, H. E. J. Am. Chem. Sac. 1937, 59, 2549. Millero, F. J.; Sotolongo, S.J. Chem. Eng. Data 1988, 3 1 , 470. Kumar, A.; Atklnson, G.; Howell, R. D. J. Solution Chem. 1982, 1 1 , 857. Patwardhan, V. S.;Kumar. A. AIChE J. 1986, 1429. Patwardhan, V. S.;Kumar. A. AIChE J. 1986, 1419. Young, T. F. Rec. Chem. frog. 1951, 12, 81. Pltzer, K. S.J. fhys. Chem. 1973, 7 7 , 268. Rogers, P. S. 2.; Pltzer, K. S. J. fhys. Chem. Ref. Data 1982, 1 1 , 15. Friedman, H. L. Ionic Solotlon Theory; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1962; Vol. 3. Anderson, H. L.; Wood, R. H. I n Water, A Comprehensive Treatise; Franks, F., Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1973; Vol 111, Chapter 2.

Received for review April 20, 1987. Accepted January 4, 1988.