Article pubs.acs.org/JPCC
Molecular Orientation and Site Dependent Charge Transfer Dynamics at PTCDA/TiO2(110) Interface Revealed by Resonant Photoemission Spectroscopy Liang Cao,†,‡ Yu-Zhan Wang,‡ Jian-Qiang Zhong,‡ Yu-Yan Han,† Wen-Hua Zhang,† Xiao-Jiang Yu,∥ Fa-Qiang Xu,*,† Dong-Chen Qi,*,‡,§ and Andrew T. S. Wee*,‡ †
National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, P. R. China 230029 ‡ Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, 2 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117542 ∥ Singapore Synchrotron Light Source, National University of Singapore, 5 Research Link, Singapore 117603 § Department of Physics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria Australia 3086 S Supporting Information *
ABSTRACT: Charge transfer dynamics across the interface of 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA) organic molecules and the reduced rutile TiO2 (110) 1 × 1 surface has been investigated using core-hole clock implementation of resonant photoemission spectroscopy (RPES). It is found that ultrafast charge transfer from PTCDA molecules to TiO2 substrate takes place on the time scale of 8−20 fs due to their strong electronic coupling. Moreover, the charge transfer time scale at the PTCDA/TiO2 (110) interface shows evident orientational dependence which varies with the molecular site owing to different electronic coupling strengths.
I. INTRODUCTION In model studies and practical applications, organic dye sensitization for photovoltaic devices based on TiO2 electrodes has attracted considerable attention as one of the most promising low-cost replacements for the market-dominant silicon-based photovoltaics.1,2 The high power conversion efficiency of more than 11% has been achieved using ruthenium complexes as organic sensitizers.3 Increasing efforts have also been devoted to using metal-free organic sensitizers with better stability, lower cost, higher efficiency, and better environmental friendliness.4 The efficiency of around 10% has been achieved using conjugated spacer molecules such as indoline dye, dithienosilole, 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene, and thienothiophene.5−8 Further improvement to the efficiency relies on better understanding of the critical interfaces between organic molecules and TiO2 substrates. It is well-known that the exciton dissociation through ultrafast electron transfer from the photoexcited state of sensitizer into the conduction band of large band gap semiconductors, mostly TiO2, is one of the most critical processes that determine the device efficiency. Charge transfer dynamics at the organic molecule/substrate interface is known to be determined by several factors, most noticeably the energy level alignment and the interfacial electronic coupling strength.9 In addition, the supramolecular packing and/or molecular orientation of organic molecules at interfaces are also found to © 2014 American Chemical Society
markedly affect the charge transfer dynamics both within the molecular assemblies and at the organic−inorganic interfaces.10 On one hand, for example, it was found for phthalocyanine (Pc) films that the delocalization of excited electrons in wellordered regions is faster than that in disordered regions.11 Similarly, improved charge delocalization was also observed in titanyl phthalocyanine (TiOPc) thin films subject to postannealing process which can lead to higher crystallinity.12 On the other hand, a much faster charge transfer process was observed for lying-down 4-fluorobenzenethiol SAMs on Au(111) as compared to the standing-up configuration of molecules due to the much enhanced d−π electronic coupling at the interface between the metal substrate and the molecules for the lying-down molecular configuration.13 Therefore, understanding the structural dependent charge transfer process has important implications for improving the performance of photovoltaic devices. It is worth noting that in practical applications photovoltaic devices such as dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) or quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs)14 made from nanocrystalline TiO2 film with various highly crystalline morphologies; e.g., nanoparticles, nanotubes, nanowires, nanosheets, etc., are Received: October 19, 2013 Revised: January 4, 2014 Published: January 29, 2014 4160
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp4103542 | J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 4160−4166
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Article
decay (resonant photoemission, Figure 1b) and spectator decay (resonant Auger, Figure 1c). Consequently, measurable photoelectron intensity is observed. However, if the molecular orbitals are strongly coupled to the substrate, the excited electrons can delocalize into conduction band of substrate (Figure 1d) within the core-hole lifetime. The autoionization process is quenched, and core holes decay via the normal Auger process (Figure 1e). By comparing the resonant photoemission intensity in coupled molecule−substrate system with that in isolated system following the analysis procedure outlined by Brühwiler,38 the change transfer time scale can be quantified. In this work, core-hole clock implementation of resonant photoemission spectroscopy (RPES) is used to study the charge transfer time scale at the PTCDA/TiO2(110) interface. Charge transfer dynamics at submonolayer (0.5 ML) and monolayer regimes are discussed in relation to the distinct molecular orientations and organization at different coverages.
receiving a lot of attention because such structures may improve the device performance.15−19 Specifically, nanocrystalline anatase TiO2 would be more desirable in DSSCs because of high photoactivity, high surface area for dye adsorption, high light harvesting efficiency, and efficient charge transport properties.20−22 However, the less availability of synthetic techniques for single crystalline anatase TiO2 strongly influences its application as substrate for model studies. In this regard, the rutile TiO2(110) with advantages including chemical stability, commercial availability, well-defined electronic structure, and easy surface cleaning serves as a model surface for fundamental research.23−26 On the other hand, 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA) has been widely used in organic electronics and also serves as a model planar organic semiconductor molecule for fundamental research.27−29 It has been studied on a wide range of substrates focusing on morphologies, optical properties, and electronic properties.30−33 In a recent study,34 we have systematically investigated the electronic structure, chemical interactions, molecular orientations, and energy level alignment at the PTCDA/rutile TiO2(110) interface using synchrotron-based photoemission spectroscopy (PES) and near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy. It was found that PTCDA molecules adopt distinct molecular orientations within the first monolayer (ML) region: slightly tilted at 0.5 ML and disordered at 1 ML due to strong interfacial interactions between PTCDA molecules and TiO2(110) surface.34 Furthermore, the strong covalent bonds formed between PTCDA molecules and the TiO2(110) surface give rise to robust electronic coupling and favorable energy alignment at the interface that are critical for efficient photosensitization. Core-hole clock spectroscopy serves as a powerful tool that has been successfully applied to investigate the ultrafast charge transfer dynamics of various organic molecules/TiO2 systems with unprecedented temporal resolution (60
a
The errors are estimated from the uncertainties in the intensities of both integrated RPES and NEXAFS spectra.58
IV. CONCLUSIONS In summary, the charge transfer dynamics of PTCDA on rutile TiO2(110) have been investigated in situ using synchrotronbased core-hole clock spectroscopy. The charge transfer time scales at the PTCDA/TiO2(110) interface are on the order of 8−20 fs due to strong interfacial electronic coupling and favorable energy level alignment. It is revealed that the charge transfer time scale at different molecular sites (i.e., perylene core vs anhydride end groups) is affected differently by the molecular orientation (and thus coupling strength) in the PTCDA/TiO2 system. Our results thus have important implications for the understanding of the charge transfer dynamics at PTCDA/TiO2 interfaces and pave the way for the design and realization of PTCDA-based organic electronic devices.
comparable with that of monolayer and submonolayer IRPES/ INEXAFS ratio within the error, corresponding well with conclusion that electron transfer from LUMO to the substrate does not occur due to the energy mismatch. Substituting these values into eq 1, the charge transfer time scales can be estimated. For submonolayer, τsubmono = 20 ± 7 fs at Cp2 Cp2 resonance. At Ca2 resonance, τsubmono is around 8 fs. The range Ca2 of 3 fs < τsubmono < 40 fs is obtained when taking into account Ca2 the error of intensity. For monolayer, τmono Cp2 = 19 ± 4 fs and τmono Ca2 > 60 fs; that is, the charge transfer time scale is beyond the limitation (∼10× core-hole lifetime) of the core-hole clock technique. It is worth noting that for the monolayer coverage with tilted PTCDA orientation the molecule−substrate coupling strength is asymmetric with one anhydride group close to substrate surface (strong coupling) and the other one tilted away from the substrate (weak coupling).34 The weak coupling anhydride group is proposed to contribute to the significantly larger charge transfer time scale observed. It is likely that the core hole created at the tilted anhydride group may localize the LUMOs, thereby preventing efficient charge transfer of the photoexcited electrons through the other strongcoupling anhydride group. LUMO localization upon core-hole creation has previously been reported as the limiting factor in fast electron transport through partially fluorinated 1,1′;4′,1″terphenyl-4″-thiol (BBB) counterpart (p-thiophenylnonafluorobiphenyl, BFF) on Au(111), whereas BBB shows much shorter charge transfer time of ∼6 fs.56 A similar observation has been made for 1,4-benzenediamine molecules on Au in which significantly longer charge transfer time on the nitrogen site occurs for the tilted phase.57 In this essence, the charge transfer time τmono Ca2 determined above is an averaged value due to the distinct charge transfer times of the two anhydride terminal groups that are coupled differently to the substrate. If we assume the charge transfer time scale is same as τsubmono for Ca2 strongly coupling anhydride groups within monolayer coverage, the charge transfer time scale for tilt anhydride group pointing toward vacuum must be even larger than τmono Ca2 , which is already beyond the limitation of core-hole clock technique. Intriguingly, the charge transfer time scale associated with the Cp2 transitions for monolayer PTCDA is comparable with that for submonolayer, in despite of the drastically different molecular orientations and order at these two thickness regimes. In contrast, the charge transfer time scale of Ca2 resonance is much shorter in submonolayer. Apparently, the change of molecular orientation has a stronger impact on the
■
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S Supporting Information *
Original RPES spectra series at valence band regime for PTCDA molecules on TiO2(110). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
■
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
*E-mail
[email protected]; Ph (86)-551-63602127; Fax (86)551-65141078 (F.-Q.X.). *E-mail
[email protected]; Ph (61)-3-9479-2128; Fax (61)(3)-9479-1552 (D.-C.Q.). *E-mail
[email protected]; Ph (65)-6516-6362; Fax (65)6777-6126 (A.T.S.W.). Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
■
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful for the financial support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 10975138 and 11175172), Singapore ARF (Grant R398-000-056-112), and NUS Core Support (Grant C-380-003-002-001).
■
REFERENCES
(1) O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye-Sensitized Colloidal TiO2 Films. Nature 1991, 353, 737−740. (2) Grätzel, M. Photoelectrochemical Cells. Nature 2001, 414, 338− 344. 4164
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp4103542 | J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 4160−4166
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Article
(21) Chen, D.; Huang, F.; Cheng, Y.-B.; Caruso, R. A. Mesoporous Anatase TiO2 Beads with High Surface Areas and Controllable Pore Sizes: A Superior Candidate for High-Performance Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2206−2210. (22) Yang, J.-S.; Liao, W.-P.; Wu, J.-J. Morphology and Interfacial Energetics Controls for Hierarchical Anatase/Rutile TiO2 Nanostructured Array for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 7425−7431. (23) Schnadt, J.; Brühwiler, P. A.; Patthey, L.; O’Shea, J. N.; Sodergren, S.; Odelius, M.; Ahuja, R.; Karis, O.; Bässler, M.; Persson, P.; et al. Experimental Evidence for Sub-3-fs Charge Transfer from an Aromatic Adsorbate to a Semiconductor. Nature 2002, 418, 620−623. (24) Zhang, W.; Cao, L.; Wan, L.; Liu, L.; Xu, F. A Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study on the Interfacial Chemistry and Electronic Structure of Terephthalic Acid Adsorption on TiO2(110)-(1 × 1) Surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 21351−21358. (25) Yuan, Q.; Wu, Z.; Jin, Y.; Xu, L.; Xiong, F.; Ma, Y.; Huang, W. Photocatalytic Cross-Coupling of Methanol and Formaldehyde on a Rutile TiO2(110) Surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5212−5219. (26) Yim, C. M.; Pang, C. L.; Thornton, G. Oxygen Vacancy Origin of the Surface Band-Gap State of TiO2(110). Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 036806. (27) Tautz, F. S. Structure and Bonding of Large Aromatic Molecules on Noble Metal Surfaces: The Example of PTCDA. Prog. Surf. Sci. 2007, 82, 479−520. (28) Forrest, S. R. Organic−Inorganic Semiconductor Devices and 3,4,9,10 Perylenetetracarboxylic Dianhydride: An Early History of Organic Electronics. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2003, 15, S2599. (29) Cao, L.; Zhang, W.; Han, Y.; Chen, T.; Zheng, Z.; Wan, L.; Xu, F.; Ibrahim, K.; Qian, H.; Wang, J. Angular Dependent NEXAFS Study of the Molecular Orientation of PTCDA Multilayers on Au (111) Surface. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2011, 56, 3575−3577. (30) Chen, W.; Huang, H.; Chen, S.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H. L.; Gao, X. Y.; Wee, A. T. Molecular Orientation of 3,4,9,10-PeryleneTetracarboxylic-Dianhydride Thin Films at Organic Heterojunction Interfaces. Appl. Sci. Lett. 2007, 91, 114102. (31) Cao, L.; Wang, Y.-Z.; Qi, D.-C.; Zhong, J.-Q.; Wee, A. T. S.; Gao, X.-Y. Modification of PTCDA/Co Interfacial Electronic Structures Using Alq3 Buffer Layer. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 25636−25642. (32) Li, K.-S.; Chang, Y.-M.; Agilan, S.; Hong, J.-Y.; Tai, J.-C.; Chiang, W.-C.; Fukutani, K.; Dowben, P. A.; Lin, M.-T. Organic Spin Valves with Inelastic Tunneling Characteristics. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 172404. (33) Godlewski, S.; Tekiel, A.; Piskorz, W.; Zasada, F.; PrauznerBechcicki, J. S.; Sojka, Z.; Szymonski, M. Supramolecular Ordering of PTCDA Molecules: The Key Role of Dispersion Forces in an Unusual Transition from Physisorbed into Chemisorbed State. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8536−8545. (34) Cao, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, J.; Han, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yu, X.; Xu, F.; Qi, D.-C.; Wee, A. T. S. Electronic Structure, Chemical Interactions and Molecular Orientations of 3,4,9,10-Perylene-tetracarboxylicdianhydride on TiO2(110). J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 24880−24887. (35) Yu, S.; Ahmadi, S.; Zuleta, M.; Tian, H.; Schulte, K.; Pietzsch, A.; Hennies, F.; Weissenrieder, J.; Yang, X.; Göthelid, M. Adsorption Geometry, Molecular Interaction, and Charge Transfer of Triphenylamine-Based Dye on Rutile TiO2(110). J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 224704. (36) Weston, M.; Britton, A. J.; O’Shea, J. N. Charge Transfer Dynamics of Model Charge Transfer Centers of a Multicenter Water Splitting Dye Complex on Rutile TiO2(110). J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 054705. (37) Mayor, L. C.; Ben Taylor, J.; Magnano, G.; Rienzo, A.; Satterley, C. J.; O’Shea, J. N.; Schnadt, J. Photoemission, Resonant Photoemission, and X-ray Absorption of a Ru(II) Complex Adsorbed on Rutile TiO2(110) Prepared by In Situ Electrospray Deposition. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 114701.
(3) Han, L.; Islam, A.; Chen, H.; Malapaka, C.; Chiranjeevi, B.; Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Yanagida, M. High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell with a Novel Co-Adsorbent. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6057− 6060. (4) Chen, C.; Liao, J.-Y.; Chi, Z.; Xu, B.; Zhang, X.; Kuang, D.-B.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Xu, J. Metal-Free Organic Dyes Derived from Triphenylethylene for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Tuning of the Performance by Phenothiazine and Carbazole. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 8994−9005. (5) Hwang, S.; Lee, J. H.; Park, C.; Lee, H.; Kim, C.; Lee, M. H.; Lee, W.; Park, J.; Kim, K.; Park, N. G. A Highly Efficient Organic Sensitizer for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4887−4889. (6) Ito, S.; Miura, H.; Uchida, S.; Takata, M.; Sumioka, K.; Liska, P.; Comte, P.; Péchy, P.; Gräetzel, M. High-Conversion-Efficiency Organic Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with a Novel Indoline Dye. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5194−5196. (7) Zhang, G.; Bala, H.; Cheng, Y.; Shi, D.; Lv, X.; Yu, Q.; Wang, P. High Efficiency and Stable Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with an Organic Chromophore Featuring a Binary π-Conjugated Spacer. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2198−2200. (8) Zeng, W.; Cao, Y.; Bai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, F.; Pan, C.; Wang, P. Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with an Organic Photosensitizer Featuring Orderly Conjugated Ethylenedioxythiophene and Dithienosilole Blocks. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 1915− 1925. (9) Wang, L.; Chen, W.; Wee, A. T. S. Charge Transfer across the Molecule/Metal Interface Using the Core Hole Clock Technique. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2008, 63, 465−486. (10) Chen, W.; Qi, D.-C.; Huang, H.; Gao, X.; Wee, A. T. S. Organic−Organic Heterojunction Interfaces: Effect of Molecular Orientation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 410−424. (11) de Jong, M. P.; Osikowicz, W.; Sorensen, S. L.; Sergeyev, S.; Geerts, Y. H.; Salaneck, W. R. Femtosecond Charge Transfer in Assemblies of Discotic Liquid Crystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 15784−15790. (12) Yu, S.; Ahmadi, S.; Sun, C.; Schulte, K.; Pietzsch, A.; Hennies, F.; Zuleta, M.; Göthelid, M. Crystallization-Induced Charge-Transfer Change in TiOPc Thin Films Revealed by Resonant Photoemission Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 14969−14977. (13) Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Chen, W.; Feng, Y.; Wee, A. T. S. Configuration-Dependent Interface Charge Transfer at a Molecule− Metal Junction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8003−8007. (14) Kamat, P. V. Quantum Dot Solar Cells. Semiconductor Nanocrystals as Light Harvesters. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 18737−18753. (15) Liu, B.; Aydil, E. S. Growth of Oriented Single-Crystalline Rutile TiO2 Nanorods on Transparent Conducting Substrates for DyeSensitized Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3985−3990. (16) Jiang, D.; Hao, Y.; Shen, R.; Ghazarian, S.; Ramos, A.; Zhou, F. Effective Blockage of the Interfacial Recombination Process at TiO2 Nanowire Array Electrodes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 11906−11912. (17) Hwang, Y. J.; Hahn, C.; Liu, B.; Yang, P. Photoelectrochemical Properties of TiO2 Nanowire Arrays: A Study of the Dependence on Length and Atomic Layer Deposition Coating. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5060−5069. (18) Ito, S.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Liska, P.; Charvet, R.; Comte, P.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Péchy, P.; Takata, M.; Miura, H.; et al. High-Efficiency Organic-Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Controlled by Nanocrystalline-TiO2 Electrode Thickness. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 1202−1205. (19) Liu, Z.; Su, X.; Hou, G.; Bi, S.; Xiao, Z.; Jia, H. Spherical TiO2 Aggregates with Different Building Units for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8177−8183. (20) Scanlon, D. O.; Dunnill, C. W.; Buckeridge, J.; Shevlin, S. A.; Logsdail, A. J.; Woodley, S. M.; Catlow, C. R. A.; Powell, M. J.; Palgrave, R. G.; Parkin, I. P.; et al. Band Alignment of Rutile and Anatase TiO2. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 798−801. 4165
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp4103542 | J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 4160−4166
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Article
(38) Brühwiler, P. A.; Karis, O.; Mårtensson, N. Charge-Transfer Dynamics Studied Using Resonant Core Spectroscopies. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2002, 74, 703. (39) Yu, X.; Wilhelmi, O.; Moser, H. O.; Vidyaraj, S. V.; Gao, X.; Wee, A. T. S.; Nyunt, T.; Qian, H.; Zheng, H. New Soft X-ray Facility SINS for Surface and Nanoscale Science at SSLS. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2005, 144−147, 1031−1034. (40) Graber, T.; Forster, F.; Schöll, A.; Reinert, F. Experimental Determination of the Attenuation Length of Electrons in Organic Molecular Solids: The Example of PTCDA. Surf. Sci. 2011, 605, 878− 882. (41) Möbus, M.; Karl, N.; Kobayashi, T. Structure of Perylenetetracarboxylic-dianhydride Thin Films on Alkali Halide Crystal Substrates. J. Cryst. Growth 1992, 116, 495−504. (42) Hirose, Y.; Kahn, A.; Aristov, V.; Soukiassian, P.; Bulovic, V.; Forrest, S. R. Chemistry and Electronic Properties of Metal-Organic Semiconductor Interfaces: Al, Ti, In, Sn, Ag, and Au on PTCDA. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 13748−13758. (43) Azuma, Y.; Hasebe, T.; Miyamae, T.; Okudaira, K. K.; Harada, Y.; Seki, K.; Morikawa, E.; Saile, V.; Ueno, N. Angle-Resolved UV Photoelectron Spectra (UPS) of Thin Films of Perylene-3,4,9,10tetracarboxylic Dianhydride on MoS2. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 1998, 5, 1044−1046. (44) Cao, L.; Wang, Y. Z.; Chen, T. X.; Zhang, W. H.; Yu, X. J.; Ibrahim, K.; Wang, J. O.; Qian, H. J.; Xu, F. Q.; Qi, D. C.; et al. Charge Transfer Dynamics of 3,4,9,10-Perylene-tetracarboxylic-dianhydride Molecules on Au(111) Probed by Resonant Photoemission Spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 174701. (45) Taborski, J.; Väterlein, P.; Dietz, H.; Zimmermann, U.; Umbach, E. NEXAFS Investigations on Ordered Adsorbate Layers of Large Aromatic Molecules. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1995, 75, 129−147. (46) Schnadt, J.; Schiessling, J.; Brühwiler, P. A. Comparison of the Size of Excitonic Effects in Molecular π Systems as Measured by Core and Valence Spectroscopies. Chem. Phys. 2005, 312, 39−45. (47) Diebold, U. The Surface Science of Titanium Dioxide. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2003, 48, 53−229. (48) Schnadt, J.; O’Shea, J. N.; Patthey, L.; Krempaský, J.; Mårtensson, N.; Brühwiler, P. A. Alignment of Valence Photoemission, X-ray Absorption, and Substrate Density of States for an Adsorbate on a Semiconductor Surface. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 235420. (49) Coville, M.; Thomas, T. D. Molecular Effects on Inner-Shell Lifetimes: Possible Test of the One-Center Model of Auger Decay. Phys. Rev. A 1991, 43, 6053. (50) Outka, D. A.; Stöhr, J. Curve Fitting Analysis of Near-Edge Core Excitation Spectra of Free, Adsorbed, and Polymeric Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 3539−3554. (51) Kikuma, J.; Tonner, B. P. Photon Energy Dependence of Valence Band Photoemission and Resonant Photoemission of Polystyrene. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1996, 82, 41−52. (52) Kera, S.; Setoyama, H.; Onoue, M.; Okudaira, K. K.; Harada, Y.; Ueno, N. Origin of Indium-[Perylene-3,4,9,10-Tetracarboxilic Dianhydride] Interface States Studied by Outermost Surface Spectroscopy Using Metastable Atoms. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 115204. (53) Westermark, K.; Rensmo, H.; Schnadt, J.; Persson, P.; Södergren, S.; Brühwiler, P. A.; Lunell, S.; Siegbahn, H. Electron Dynamics within Ru-2,2′-bipyridine Complexean N 1s Core Level Excitation Study. Chem. Phys. 2002, 285, 167−176. (54) Schnadt, J.; O’Shea, J. N.; Patthey, L.; Kjeldgaard, L.; Åhlund, J.; Nilson, K.; Schiessling, J.; Krempaský, J.; Shi, M.; Karis, O.; et al. Excited-State Charge Transfer Dynamics in Systems of Aromatic Adsorbates on TiO2 Studied with Resonant Core Techniques. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 12462. (55) Kempgens, B.; Kivimäki, A.; Neeb, M.; Köppe, H. M.; Bradshaw, A. M.; Feldhaus, J. A High-Resolution N 1s Photoionization Study of the N2 Molecule in the Near-Threshold Region. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 1996, 29, 5389. (56) Chen, W.; Wang, L.; Huang, C.; Lin, T. T.; Gao, X. Y.; Loh, K. P.; Chen, Z. K.; Wee, A. T. S. Effect of Functional Group (Fluorine) of
Aromatic Thiols on Electron Transfer at the Molecule−Metal Interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 128, 935−939. (57) Kladnik, G.; Cvetko, D.; Batra, A.; Dell’Angela, M.; Cossaro, A.; Kamenetska, M.; Venkataraman, L.; Morgante, A. Ultrafast Charge Transfer through Noncovalent Au−N Interactions in Molecular Systems. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 16477−16482. (58) Taylor, J. B.; Mayor, L. C.; Swarbrick, J. C.; O’Shea, J. N.; Schnadt, J. Charge-Transfer Dynamics at Model Metal−Organic Solar Cell Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 16646−16655. (59) Batra, A.; Kladnik, G.; Vázquez, H.; Meisner, J. S.; Floreano, L.; Nuckolls, C.; Cvetko, D.; Morgante, A.; Venkataraman, L. Quantifying Through-Space Charge Transfer Dynamics in π-Coupled Molecular Systems. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1086.
4166
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp4103542 | J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 4160−4166