Monochlorinated to Octachlorinated Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxin

Jan 18, 2018 - Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran (PCDD/F) emissions in fly ash from multiple-field electrostatic precipitators in diff...
0 downloads 10 Views 702KB Size
Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Article

Monochlorinated to Octachlorinated Polychlorinated Dibenzo#p#dioxin and Dibenzofuran Emissions in Sintering Fly Ash from Multiple-field Electrostatic Precipitators Mengjing Wang, Qianqian Li, Wenbin Liu, Mingliang Fang, and Ying Han Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04848 • Publication Date (Web): 18 Jan 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 19, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Monochlorinated to Octachlorinated Polychlorinated Dibenzo‑p‑dioxin and

2

Dibenzofuran Emissions in Sintering Fly Ash from Multiple-field Electrostatic

3

Precipitators

4

Mengjing Wang†‡, Qianqian Li†§, Wenbin Liu*†§, Mingliang Fang‡, Ying Han†

5



6

Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

7

100085, China;

8



9

50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639789, Singapore;

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University,

10

§

11

*Corresponding

12

+86-10-62923563; E-mail: [email protected].

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China. author:

Dr.

Wenbin

Liu;

Phone:

13 14

TOC art.

15

16 17

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

+86-10-62849356;

Fax:

Environmental Science & Technology

18

ABSTRACT

19

Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran (PCDD/F) emissions in fly ash

20

from multiple-field electrostatic precipitators in different sized sintering plants were

21

studied. The monochlorinated–trichlorinated and tetrachlorinated–octachlorinated

22

PCDD/F concentrations were higher for small plants (90 m2) than for medium (91–

23

180 m2) and large (>180 m2) plants. The PCDD/F concentrations and less-chlorinated

24

PCDD/F contributions to the total PCDD/F concentrations increased as the fly ash

25

particle size decreased moving through the precipitator stages; the abundance of

26

monochlorinated–trichlorinated PCDD/F congeners and homologues also increased.

27

The ash particle size and surface area can be directly used to indicate

28

monochlorinated–trichlorinated PCDD/Fs and toxic equivalents (TEQs). Previously

29

ignored PCDD/F emissions in discarded fly ash were identified. Estimated total

30

monochlorinated–trichlorinated PCDD/F and TEQ emissions in discarded fly ash

31

were 155 kg and 1.979 kg TEQ, respectively, in 2003–2014, and the ratio between

32

annual PCDD/F emissions in discarded fly ash and flue gases has gradually increased.

33

Reductions in monochlorinated–trichlorinated PCDD/F emitted in flue gas and fly ash

34

in 2003–2014 were 28 and 40 kg, respectively, because of the phasing out of

35

small-scale plants. Reductions in TEQs emitted in flue gas and fly ash in 2003–2014

36

were 7476 and 180 g TEQ, respectively.

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 32

Page 3 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

37

INTRODUCTION

38

Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDDs

39

and PCDFs, together abbreviated PCDD/Fs) have been studied extensively because

40

they can cause adverse health effects. Industrial activities have historically been the

41

most important sources of PCDD/Fs.1-7 Less-chlorinated PCDD/Fs (mono-, di-, and

42

tri- (Mo, Di, and Tr)) have recently attracted attention because higher, less-chlorinated

43

PCDD/F levels have been found in certain environmental matrices, are toxic,8-12 and

44

could be precursors of 2,3,7,8-chlorinated PCDD/Fs involved in thermal processes.8,9

45

It is therefore important to gain a full picture of MoCDD/F–TrCDD/F emissions and

46

environmental behaviors.

47

Sintering is the most important single industrial source of PCDD/Fs in China,

48

being responsible for about 34.8% of total PCDD/F emissions to the atmosphere in

49

flue gases in 2013. In our previous study, an intensive investigation was carried out to

50

estimate and characterize the emission levels and profiles of MoCDD/Fs to octa- (O)

51

CDD/F in flue gas from Chinese sintering plants.13 However, there are still no

52

available data or knowledge regarding emission levels and profiles of MoCDD/Fs to

53

OCDD/F emitted in fly ash from sintering to date.

54

The amount of sintering fly ash produced in China has increased dramatically,

55

and more fly ash is produced during sintering than during waste incineration.14 It has

56

been estimated that 163 kt of fly ash (4.6% of total industrial fly ash emissions) was

57

emitted from Chinese sintering plants in 2015.15,16 Serially connected ESPs are used

58

to capture large amounts of fine particulate matter from flue gases to meet Chinese 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

59

emission standard GB 28662-2012, which is 50 mg m−3. PCDD/F emissions to the

60

atmosphere have been decreased by using ESPs to remove fly ash particles, but the

61

PCDD/Fs in the particles were not actually destroyed but mostly transferred to the fly

62

ash. PCDD/F emissions in flue gases may therefore accurately represent emissions to

63

the ambient air while not accurately reflecting the amounts and patterns of PCDD/Fs

64

formed during the sintering processes. The PCDD/F concentrations and profiles in fly

65

ash may be more representative than the concentrations and profiles in the flue gases

66

when studying the unintentional formation of PCDD/Fs and underlying mechanisms

67

involved. Furthermore, it is widely recognized that fly ash can promote PCDD/F

68

formation during industrial thermal processes through heterogeneous reactions

69

because fly ash contains large amounts of carbonous residue and catalytic

70

elements.17,18

71

The fly ash particle size captured decreases strongly moving through serially

72

connected ESPs. No systematic research has been performed on the link between the

73

properties (e.g., particle size distribution, surface area, and total organic carbon (TOC)

74

and chloride contents) of fly ash collected by serially connected ESPs and the

75

amounts and profiles of MoCDD/Fs to OCDD/F formed during sintering. Performing

76

such research will improve our understanding of the concentrations and profiles

77

involved in PCDD/F formation during sintering because previous research has

78

focused on mixed fly ash.

79

The release of PCDD/Fs in fly ash produced during sintering processes was not

80

addressed in the Chinese national implementation plans for the Stockholm 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 32

Page 5 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

81

Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants in 2003 and 2012 because almost all fly

82

ash produced by sintering plants was assumed to be recycled. In fact, approximately

83

95% of the fly ash captured in the initial ESP stages is recycled by adding it to the raw

84

materials, and the fly ash collected in the last ESP stage is sent to landfill or

85

stockpiled. The emission of PCDD/Fs from discarded fly ash was, however,

86

neglected.

87

Decreasing CO2, SO2, NOx, and particulate emissions will require advanced

88

technologies to be promoted and outdated facilities to be closed.19,20 These measures

89

could also indirectly decrease PCDD/F emissions. The PCDD/F emission decreases

90

that could be achieved by phasing out obsolete facilities in the most energy-intensive

91

industries (cement, coke, iron, power, and steel production, all of which are major

92

sources of PCDD/F emissions in China) have been estimated.20-23 However, the

93

PCCD/F emission decreases that could be achieved by closing old sintering plants and

94

improving sintering processes are unclear and have not been estimated.

95

To address these gaps in knowledge, 87 fly ash samples from serially connected

96

ESPs in 24 typical sintering plants of different sizes in this study were collected and

97

analyzed to allow the MoCDD/F–OCDD/F concentrations and profiles emitted to be

98

determined, emission factors to be derived, and the relationships between PCDD/F

99

concentrations and ash properties to be investigated.

100

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

101

Sintering and sampling. Sintering is a pretreatment step in the iron production

102

process. Sintering involves heating fine particles of metal ores to cause them to 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

103

agglomerate. Approximately 40% of all iron ore sintering (more than in any other

104

country) occurs in China.13 The Chinese government is attempting to decrease energy

105

use by closing less efficient and obsolete sintering facilities. Sintering plants