Natural Polymers as Advanced Materials: Some Research Needs and

Chapter 1

Natural Polymers as Advanced Materials: Some Research Needs and Directions 1

2

R. L. Shogren and E. B. Bagley 1

Plant Polymer Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1815 N. University Street, Peoria, IL 61604 Biotechnology Research and Development Corporation, 1815 N. University Street, Peoria, IL 61604

Downloaded by UNIV SOUTH DAKOTA on August 27, 2013 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 25, 1999 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1999-0723.ch001

2

At the Fifth Chemical Congress of North America held at Cancun in November, 1997, a broad definition of the fields to be covered in the symposium on natural polymers as advanced materials was given. Included were recent developments and future prospects for natural polymers in uses ranging from detergents, adhesives, packaging, biodegradable plastics, paper, rubber, textile, drug delivery systems to processes including nanometer composites. Several recent articles and books have reviewed the structure, properties and applications of natural polymers (1-12). This chapter, rather than reviewing accumulated knowledge of natural polymers, will attempt to point out some shortcomings and opportunities for better understanding and applications. Because of the authors' expertise in starch, many examples of problems and opportunities in this area will be presented as models for similar needs in other areas of natural polymer research. The concepts involved in polymers as advanced materials hardly come as recent revelations. The advantages of cellulose fibers in paper are not news to technologists. Nature itself has made good use of structural natural polymers, as in chitin, and produced strong polymeric fibers, as in spiderwebs, long before synthetic chemists arrived on the scene to complicate matters. In earlier times, much use was made of natural materials and, especially, carbohydrates. David Morris in an article entitled "Back to the Future" (75), maintains that "One hundred and fifty years ago, ours was a carbohydrate economy" with "clothes, houses, vehicles, chemicals, dyes and inks" derived from plants. Products included ethanol, plastics (celluloid and cellophane, the firstfilmplastic) and cotton and woolfibersused in clothing.

NOTE: Product names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product and the use of the name by the USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable.

3

2

© 1999 American Chemical Society

In Biopolymers; Imam, S., et al.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1999.


3 Many of the applications of natural polymers lost out in the competitive world to synthetic polymers, in which properties could be tailored to needs. Petroleum-based products had properties independent of the material vagaries associated with crops, whose component properties can vary significantly with growing site, agronomic factors including weather, and other complicated considerations. Molecular weight, degree of branching, and chemical groups in side and main chain sites can be more readily modified and controlled for synthetic polymers than for most natural materials. However, in some cases, chemical modifications of natural polymers can lead to materials of particularly interesting properties; e.g., hydrolyzed starch/polyacrylonitrile graft copolymers with astounding water absorption and holding characteristics...the first superabsorbent (14). In general, however, these problems caused natural polymers to become comparatively unattractive at the commercial level. As a result, Morris emphasized that by the 1990's two thirds of our clothes were derivedfromoil, plastics replaced paper containers, food dyes camefrommineral oil and so on. These were all changes indicative of the shift of marketsfromnatural to synthetic materials. In recent years, the socio-economic situation has changed to make natural polymers once again worth consideration for many applications. First of all, oil embargos and higher oil prices and concern over long-term availability of oil forced technologists and scientists to consider alternative, and especially renewable, sources of materials. Second, environmental considerations made the use of many natural materials very attractive because of their biodegradability, low toxicity and low disposal costs. Finally, properties aside, the use of natural materials, such as starch, for fillers in composite materials was economically attractive because of the high price of synthetic polymer matrices and the low prices of such natural products as starch and starch granules. These low costs are related, of course, to the large agricultural surpluses of recent years and the ability of farmers to produce more. However, utilization of natural polymers only because they are cheapfillershardly justifies their inclusion as "advanced materials." To classify as advanced materials, there should be significant new and sophisticated technical features in their design, development, or processing. That is, there must be scientific or engineering factors, that go significantly beyond mere economic advantage, to warrant the designation "advanced."

Coverage in Cancun This symposium addressed many of the current concerns in developing advanced materialsfromnatural polymers. Environmental concerns provided the spark needed to initiate studies of natural materials which would biodegrade readily. One can classify the presentations into work addressing four types of problems: l)-choice of natural starting material and design of modifications needed for particular applications; 2)processing to yield products of the needed final properties; 3)-characterization of the biodegradability of the products; ^-evaluation of mechanisms and reaction pathways.



4 From the papers presented, it is evident that environmental concerns and particularly issues of product degradability drive much of the research and development work reported at this symposium. Biodegradability can be considered in a broad context as illustrated by the presentation of Maysinger (McGill University) reporting on the use of biodegradable polymers for delivery of neuroactive agents to the nervous system and Heta Ravel's discussion of controlled release of pentachlorophenol from various biodegradable polymer matrix systems. Whether the biodegradability is required for plastics used as mulch on farms or for use in controlled release in the human body or elsewhere, there is a need to know how the materials decay. Hence, considerable attention is being given to the mechanisms of biodegradation. Greene and Imam discussed a working model for predicting the relative rate at which polymer formulations will biodegrade. Other approaches included investigations by Gilkes et al. of cellulose hydrolysis by microorganisms. In terms of materials, per se, starch and cellulose must be pretty well put at the head of a list of natural polymers and many of the presentations at Cancun centered on these materials, with starch being studied in both the granular and "thermoplastic" state. Obtaining these materials in fibrous form opens up application opportunities as discussed by Bergthaller et al. any of his examples are composites, as are many natural materials such as chitin, wool, etc. Opportunities for utilization of microfibrils and microcrystalline starch and cellulose (a result of biosynthesis of various polysaccharides) in preparation of nanocomposite materials was discussed by Cavaille and Dufresne. For many applications though, the natural polymer must be modified. For control of useful surface active properties, Tao and Wang prepared long-chain fatty acid esters of glucan carbohydrate polymers and oligomers. Interestingly, lignin, the second most abundant natural polymer in the world (cellulose being number 1), was not covered in a presentation in Cancun. This is probably a reflection of the relatively scant amount of research being done on lignin and the difficulty of working with this complex polymer (75). One would expect that lignin and other materials which are now considered "waste" products, such as wheat straw, corn cobs and stalks, soybean hulls, citrus peels and chitin from crustacean shells, will receive more attention in the future as world population and demand for productsfromnatural resources increases. Proteins of course are a major form of natural polymer and, in combination with synthetic polymers, can provide unique opportunities. Thus, Huang discussed interpenetrating and non-interpenetrating networks of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic protein with synthetic biodegradable polyether and polyester components to produce materials of a wide range of chemical and physical properties. As with other composites containing both natural and synthetic components, the combinations are better than the natural polymer alone. There is considerable current interest too in edible coatings, where proteins can be especially relevant and particular interest was expressed in combinations, such as pectin/starch/calcium.


5


Problems and Research and Development Opportunities Molecular and Supramolecular Structures. Surprisingly, there is often a lack of solid information on the molecular properties of natural polymers. Starch, for instance, is a polymer used in enormous quantities in industrial and food applications, but evaluation of molecular parameters is difficult. Amylose is perhaps better characterized than is amylopectin, where quoted molecular weights are into the hundreds of millions (16,17). The measurement of molecules showing such large values of molecular weight can be questioned. For example, in light scattering studies, large agglomerations of molecules, either as entangled species (which may even be formed as a result of the polymerization process during biosynthesis) or as a result of actual cross-linking processes resulting in gel particles, can lead to unrealistically high molecular weight values. Attempts to filter the samples for light scattering or in a chromatographic experiment can, no doubt, result in spurious numbers. One can never be sure that what is removed isn't the critical portion of the sample and the issues and concerns are complicated by the fact that processing (as infiltration)could, in principle, result in shear degradation of the molecules. More extensive and more detailed investigations of these points seem well warranted. One reason for further investigation of molecular and associative properties of these natural polymers is their molecular weights are often so great and they are so "entangled" or agglomerated through physical interactions that processing has a significant effect on properties (18-20). The systematic investigation of processing effects requires reliable and sensitive means. Another area where systematic scientific information is lacking with many natural polymers is in knowledge of the solubilities and phase separation characteristics of natural polymers. The importance of such information has been emphasized for protein systems by Tolstoguzoff and coworkers (27,22), but the lack of solid information can also be illustrated again with reference to starch. In Barton's work on polymer-liquid interaction parameters (23), this ubiquitous natural polymer is conspicuous by its absence. Amylose receives some minimal attention, but amylopectin is almost completely neglected. The reasons for this are complex. Not least of them is that starch and proteins with polar forces present, along with numerous opportunities for hydrogen bonding, are very difficult to handle theoretically and experimentally. Much of the information available, therefore, is empirical and relatively unsophisticated at that. There is a great need for extensive fundamental investigations into the molecular structure of natural polymers, their associative and agglomerative behavior, their phase behavior, their solubility characteristics in water and mixed solvents. Much information is needed to provide the background information for materials design, processing and property interpretation. Great opportunities exist for the natural polymer scientist and engineer.



6 New Natural Polymers and Modeling. Computer based techniques have begun to be used to design and predict the properties of polymers, primarily of the synthetic type (24). Some pioneering molecular modeling studies of plant proteins, starch and cellulose have been carried out recently (25-27). These have just scratched the surface of what is possible. The potential of emerging computer based methods to predict conformation, interactions and properties of natural polymers, their chemical derivatives and blends is immense. This has become feasible for large molecules only recently as computer speed has increased and molecular dynamics simulations and new approximate methods have been developed. Due to phenomenal advances in molecular biology, it may well become feasible in the near future to genetically manipulate plants (such as corn or soybeans) to produce natural polymers with well defined molecular weight and branching and even introduce functional groups, such as acetyl, sulphate, amino and phosphate moieties. This may be easiest in the case of proteins, where the amino acid sequence follows directly from the sequence of bases in the plant's DNA. For example, researchers are now modifying genes to improve the mechanical properties of animal proteins, such as elastin, silk and various adhesive polymers (12). For other types of natural polymers, the chemical structure is determined from DNA indirectly via the activity of a series of enzymes. Nevertheless, work on expression of bacterial genes for the production of poly(hydroxybutyrates) in plants is progressing and may eventually yield a polyester of very low cost (28). New genetic varieties of corn containing starches of different branch frequency and length have recently been developed (29,30). The preparation of completely new polymers in plants may even be possible. This points to the need for more understanding of the relationships between structure and function in natural polymers so we will know what kind of polymer we should make for a given application when the genetic/synthetic machinery is developed. Computer modeling may well become the "screening method" of choice to identify new polymers without having to go through the long and tedious process of synthesizing or "growing" every possibility. Also, it should not be forgotten that we currently raise only a dozen or so plant crops in large amounts and that the hundreds of thousands of other species of plants (not to mention millions of species of microorganisms) represent an undiscovered source of new polymers and fiber. Exciting work for the botanical explorer! Processing and Composites. Little is known about how the secondary and tertiary structures of natural polymers can be controlled during processing and how processing can be accomplished in a rapid and environmentallyfriendlymanner. Most synthetic polymer based plastics are processed so that molecular orientation and crystallinity are optimal for the intended application. For example, commercially available biaxially oriented polyolefinfilmshave strengths which are several times that of unoriented films. Orientation within the cell walls of polystyrene foam give the product its goodflexibilityand resilience (31). Crystallinity also increases strength, as well as solvent resistance and high temperature stability. Cellulose and proteins can be



7 oriented intofibers,but only by using organic solvents or strong bases tofirstdissolve the polymers (52). Strong interactions between polar groups make thermal processing difficult for proteins and impossible for cellulose. New plasticizers and/or chemical modifications are needed to improve thermal processibility (i.e., by extrusion). Oriented starchfilmshave never been prepared even though orientation would certainly improve the flexibility and toughness of this normally brittle material. The availability of a totally linear amylose would make orientation easier than for the branched starches now available. Crystallization is rather slow for many biopolymers, such as starch (33) and poly(hydroxybutyrates) (34). Rates of crystallization need to be reduced to seconds to allow economically feasible processing. Hints at ways to control the crystallinity of cellulose may comefromcurrent work on use of enzymes to disrupt crystallinity and promote efficient saccharification and fermentation to ethanol. Several different types of processing techniques have the potential to physically or chemically modify the properties of natural polymers in efficient and environmentallyfriendlymanners. For example, extruders have been used by the food industry and more recently by the biodegradable plastics industry. They rapidly impart thermal and mechanical energy to starch/water mixtures and, thus, transform them into a thermoplastic melt (35). Extruders can be also used as reactors to continuously modify the structure of the polymer (36). Some examples of this include the preparation of hydrolyzed, oxidized, grafted, cationic and succinylated starches (36-39). Potential benefits of reactive extrusion include shorter reaction times, less or no requirement for solvents and fewer byproducts. Other types of processing which utilize microwaves, electromagnetic radiation and ultrasound have yet to be evaluated for most natural polymers. Most natural materials are actually composites of afibrouspolymer or mineral with an amorphous polymer binder. Examples include wood, insect cuticles, sea shells, and bone. Thefiberor mineral filler gives the material high stiffness and strength, particularly since thefibersand minerals are often oriented and arranged in intricate hierarchies. The presence of only a small amount of natural polymer binder in mollusc shell or tooth enamel gives the composite a surprisingly high degree of toughness, when compared to fused mineral alone (40). Reasons for this are not well understood, but may be, in part, due to the ordered arrangement offibrousmineral or polymer. More work needs to be conducted on interactions which occur between matrix polymers and mineral orfibrousfillersand how these might be controlled to give better adhesion and control of filler morphology (epitaxy). Significant strides have been made in the processing of synthetic composites, such as glassfiber/epoxylayups, for high performance aerospace and recreational equipment. Progress in the natural polymer area has been slow, although some recent results indicate that this is changing. For example, composites containing >60% granular starch as a filler in poly(hydroxy-ester-ethers) (PHEE) have excellent mechanical properties (41). Unlike other polymers investigated so far, the adhesion between the starch and PHEE is excellent, resulting in granule rupture as the fracture mechanism of the composite. Studies are in progress to determine the molecular basis



8 of the improved adhesion. In other examples, composites of recycled paper and soy flour have a marble-like appearance and have been successfully commercialized. Structural boards based on wheat straw are also being commercialized as a replacement for plywood. Nevertheless, penetration of new plastics based on natural polymers into the marketplace has been slow because of the high cost of biodegradable polymers which are blended with the natural polymer to improve mechanical properties or the high cost of chemical modifications to the natural polymer (7,8). Costs of competing petroleum based polymers, such as polyethylene and polystyrene ($0.40-0.60/lb), are quite low compared to biodegradable polyesters, such as polylactic acid, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and synthetic polyesters ($2-8/lb). Other hurdles also exist, such as the poor water vapor barrier properties of natural polymers due to their polar character. Even PHB, which has the lowest water vapor permeability of the biodegradable polyesters, has a permeability about 10 times that of low density polyethylene (42). Yet, natural waxes have some of the lowest water vapor permeabilities known to man. Could the good barrier properties of waxes somehow be combined with the strength of a natural polymer like starch or cellulose? A fatty derivative having a regiospecific substitution pattern, which could arrange its fatty groups in an ordered manner on the surface, might be the answer. Water Soluble and Swellable Natural Polymers. Most natural polymers are water swellable. Applications that take advantage of this property would seem to be preferred. Since many water soluble polymers are discharged directly into wastewater streams after use, the biodegradability of natural polymers would be an asset in preventing the build up or toxicity in fresh water sources. Water based polymer systems avoid the use of toxic organic solvents, the use of which is becoming more restricted by legislation. Also, the prices of synthetic, water soluble synthetic polymers are quite high, usually over $l/lo. Thus, it is no surprise that starch and cellulose derivatives are widely used as water soluble adhesives, thickeners, binders and coatings (5,12). Some emerging applications include polyaspartic acid and oxidized starches as metal ion sequestrants in detergents, mussel proteins as adhesives, cross-linked anionic starches as superabsorbents in diapers and modified agricultural residues as absorbents of organic wastes (43-48). More research is needed on basic structure-property relationships of natural polymers to understand their behavior in aqueous systems. Natural Polymers and Sustainability In many ways, our current utilization of natural resources cannot be sustained. Most of our fuel for power and transportation comesfromfossil fuels, such as oil which will be depleted in the future. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levelsfromcombustion of fossil fuels are thought to be increasing global temperatures which, in turn, may cause droughts, crop losses, storm damage, etc. Soil for growing crops is being lost to erosionfromwind and rain and the expansion of cities. Irrigation water, particularly



9 in the western U.S., is gradually being depleted as aquifer wells are pumped down. The number of species of living things in the world, estimated at >10 million, are going extinct at a rate of about 0.3% per year (49). World population is presently growing at about 1.5% per year, while food production is increasing at only 0.5% per year (50). If these trends continue, world population will approximately double to 11 billion in 50 years. How can natural polymers contribute solutions to these problems? The use of natural polymers as materials and as sources of fuel, such as ethanol, lessens our dependence on non-renewable petroleum. As pointed out by Orts and Glenn in this Symposium, certain natural polymers have the potential of acting as flocculating agents to control soil lossfromerosion. Clearly, if the properties of a natural polymer, such as its strength, were improved, less would be needed for a specific application. New applications for agricultural wastes and byproducts of processing, as well as recycling of natural polymers, promise to make more efficient use of our natural resources. Also, alternative crops can produce more biomass per acre of land. Fiber from kenaf and hemp, rather than slow growing trees, can be utilized for a number of applications. This points to the need to conserve plant germplasm since solutions to future problems may lie in species as yet undiscovered.

Literature Cited

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.

Industrial Biotechnological Polymers; Gebelein, C. G.; Carraher, C. E., Eds.; Technomic: Lancaster, PA, 1995. Biodegradable Polymers and Packaging; Ching,C.,Kaplan, D.; Thomas, E., Eds.; Technomic: Lancaster, PA, 1993. Biodegradable Polymers and Plastics; Vert, M.; Feijen, J.; Albertsson, A.; Scott, G.; Chiellini, E., Eds.; Royal Soc. Chem.: Cambridge, MA, 1992. Plant Polymeric Carbohydrates; Meuser, F.; Manners, D. J.; Seibel, W., Eds.; Royal Soc. Chem.: Cambridge, MA, 1993. Starch: Chemistry and Technology; Whistler, R. L.; BeMiller, J. N.; Paschall, E. F., Eds.; Academic Press: Orlando, FL, 1984, 2nd. ed. PolymersfromBiobased Materials; Chum, H. L., Ed.; Noyes Data Co.: Park Ridge, NJ, 1991. Narayan, R. In Polymeric MaterialsfromAgricultural Feedstocks; Fishman, M. L.; Friedman, R. B.; Huang, S. J., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1994; pp. 2-28. Mayer, J. M.; Kaplan, D. L. Trends Polym. Sci. 1994, 2, 227-235. Arthur, J. C. Polym.Sci. Technol. 1983,17,27-40. O'Brien, J. P. Trends Polym. Sci. 1993, 1, 228-232. Pillai, C. K. S. Popular Plastics and Packaging 1996, 41, 69-74. Biopolymers: Making Materials Nature's Way-Background Paper; U.S. Congress, Office ofTechnology Assessment, OTA-BP-E-102, U.S. Government

Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1993.


10

13. 14. 15.


16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27.

28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43.

Morris, D. The Carbohydrate Economy, 1997, 1(1), 2-3. Fanta, G. F.; Doane, W. M. In Modified Starches: Properties and Uses; Wurzburg, O. B., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1986; pp. 149-178. Glasser, W. G.; Kelley, S. S. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd. Ed.; Mark, H. F.; Bikales, N. M.; Overberger, C. G.; Menges, G.; Kroschwitz, J. I., Eds.; J. Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, 1987, Vol. 8; pp. 795-852. Millard, M. M.; Dintzis, F. R.; Willett, J. L.; Klavons, J. A. Cereal Chem. 1997, 74, 687-691. Willett, J. L.; Millard, M. M.; Jasberg, B. K. Polymer 1997, 38, 5983-5989. Lai, L. S.; Kokini, J. L. Biotechnol. Prog. 1991, 7, 251-266. Sagar, A. D.; Merrill, E. W. Polymer 1995, 36, 1883-1886. Dintzis, F. R.; Bagley, E. B. J. Rheology 1995, 39, 1483. Grinberg, V. Y.; Tolstoguzov, V. B. Food Hydrocol. 1997, 11, 145-158. Polyakov, V. I.; Grinberg, V. Y.; Tolstoguzov, V. B. Food Hydrocol. 1997, 11, 171-180. Barton, A. F. M. CRC Handbook ofPolymer-Liquid Interaction Paramet and Solubility Parameters; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1990. Kotelyanskii, M. Trends Polym. Sci. 1997, 5, 193-198. Rothfus, J. A. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 3143-3152. Trommsdorff, U.; Tomka, I. Macromol. 1995, 28, 6128-6137. Computer Modeling ofCarbohydrate Molecules; French, A. D.; Brady, J. W., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 430; American Chemical Society: Washington,

DC, 1990. Poirier, Y.; Nawrath, C.; Somerville, C. Bio/Technol. 1995,13,142-150. Friedman, R. B. In ref. 1, pp. 13-28. BeMiller, J. N. Starch/Stärke 1997, 49, 127-131. White, J. L.; Carmak, M. In ref. 15, Vol. 10, pp. 595-618. Rebenfeld, L. In ref. 15, Vol. 6, pp. 647-733. van Soest, J. J. G.; Vliegenthart, J. F. G. Tibtech. 1997,15,208-213. Inoue, Y.; Yoshie, N. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1992, 17, 571-610. Shogren, R. L.; Fanta, G. F.; Doane, W. M. Starch/Stärke 1993, 45, 276-280. Carr, M. Proceedings of Corn Utilization Conference IV, National Corn Growers Association: St. Louis, MO, 1992. Della Valle, G.; Colonna, P.; Tayeb, J.; Vergnes, B. Spec. Pub. Roy. Soc. Chem 1993, 134, 240-251. Wang, L.; Shogren, R. L.; Willett, J. L. Starch/Stärke 1997, 49, 116-120. Wing, R. E.; Willett, J. L. Ind. Crops Prod. 1997, 7, 45-52. Calvert, P. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1992, 249, 539-546. Willett, J. L.; Doane, W. M.; Xu, W. PCT Int. Pat. Appl. WO 9731979, 1997. Shogren, R. L. J. Environ. Polym. Degrad. 1997, 5, 91-95. Swift, G. Polym Degrad. Stabil. 1994, 45, 215-231.


11 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49.


50.

Protein-Based Materials; McGrath, K.; Kaplan, D., Eds.; Birkhauser: Boston, MA, 1997. Chan, W. C. Polym Inter. 1995, 38, 319-323. Laszlo, J. A. Text. Chem. Color. 1996, 28, 13-17. Wing, R. A. Starch/Stä rke 1996, 48, 275-279. Roweton, S.; Huang, S. J.; Swift, G. J. Environ. Polym. Degrad. 1997, 5, 175. Wilson, E. O. The Diversity of Life; W. W. Norton & Co.: New York, NY, 1992; pp. 280. Brown, L. R. In State of the World; Brown, L. R.; Flavin, C.; French, H., Eds.; W. W. Norton & Co.: New York, NY, 1997; pp. 23-41.


Natural Polymers as Advanced Materials: Some Research Needs and

Recommend Documents