Nitrogen Contamination of Surficial Aquifers—A ... - ACS Publications

Dec 20, 2010 - NEIL M. DUBROVSKY. U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, California. Historic Perspective. Since the end of the Second World War (WWII), ...
0 downloads 0 Views 5MB Size
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 839–844

Nitrogen Contamination of Surficial AquiferssA Growing Legacy† LARRY J. PUCKETT U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia ANTHONY J. TESORIERO* U.S. Geological Survey, Portland, Oregon NEIL M. DUBROVSKY U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, California

ment as a result of increased fertilizer usage, fixation by crops, mineralization of animal manure, and atmospheric deposition, along with miscellaneous other sources (1, 2). N contamination is of interest because of potential health effects in drinking water (3, 4), nutrient enrichment of terrestrial (2, 5) and aquatic ecosystems (6), and contributions to global warming (2, 7). From 1945 to 2002 industrially fixed fertilizer N use in the United States increased 20-fold (Figure 1) to about 12 Tg y-1, and 78-85 Tg y-1 globally (2). In addition to inputs of industrially fixed N, animal manure and atmospheric deposition can contribute large amounts as wellsup to 8.1 Tg y-1 across the continental U.S. However, field studies rarely account for more than about 50% of applied N in harvested crops (8) and it is commonly assumed that 30% is lost through runoff or leaching to groundwater as NO3- (7, 9, 10). Owing to the mobility of nitrate (NO3-), groundwater is vulnerable to contamination from leaching; especially shallow unconfined aquifers underlying agricultural lands (3). In addition to contributing to impacts on water quality, this excess NO3- adds uncertainty to estimates of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, an important greenhouse gas (7, 10).

Trading Space for Time Heretofore, assessing historical trends in NO3- contamination of groundwater has been problematic due to the scarcity of long-term NO3- concentration data. However, application of two developmentssmethods for estimating recharge dates for groundwater and the original NO3- concentrations at the time of recharge (11)sallow reconstruction of the NO3- input history as well as assessment of the potential for removal by denitrification. In most aquifers groundwater moves at very slow rates determined by the properties of the aquifer materials. Travel times of only a few tens of meters per year are common and groundwater residence times may vary from

Historic Perspective Since the end of the Second World War (WWII), there have been increased releases of nitrogen (N) into the environ†

Editor’s Note: Features in Environmental Science & Technology can no longer include Supporting Information. This manuscript was received prior to January 1, 2011 and is therefore exempt. See the Instructions to Authors for more information on acceptable manuscript formats. * E-mail: [email protected]. 10.1021/es1038358

Not subject to U.S. Copyright. Publ. 2011 Am. Chem. Soc.

Published on Web 12/20/2010

FIGURE 1. Groundwater NO3- concentrations adjusted for denitrification (black circles) for 424 samples from the sites shown in Figure 3, and annual fertilizer N use data (black line) for the U.S. since 1945. A Lowess curve fit to the data (red line) indicates that NO3- concentrations have increased from about 2 mg L-1 in the early 1940s to about 15 mg L-1 in 2003. VOL. 45, NO. 3, 2011 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 9 839

FIGURE 2. Diagram of groundwater flow paths and residence times in typical surficial aquifers; modified after Heath (34). Groundwater travel times vary greatly depending on distance from the recharge area, aquifer hydraulic properties, slope, and depth. Consequently, aquifers comprise a variety of waters of varying age and composition. By sampling at various points on flow paths it is possible to reconstruct a chronology of aquifer contamination.

FIGURE 3. Map showing locations of groundwater sampling sites used in this analysis. a matter of days near streams and other discharge areas, to centuries for groundwater that recharged at groundwater divides (Figure 2) (12). Therefore most shallow unconfined aquifers contain a cross section of waters of varying ages. By installing well screens at various depths in aquifers, it is possible to measure NO3- concentrations in samples of groundwater that recharged at various times in the past. An intrinsic problem faced in quantifying and understanding the impacts of excess NO3- is that in some aquifers NO3- losses and trends may be masked due to denitrification (13-15), a microbiological process by which NO3is converted to N2 gas. Because the N2 gas created by denitrification remains in solution (16), it can be used to reconstruct NO3- concentrations at the time of recharge, making it possible to reconstruct multidecade chronologies of NO3- contamination from spatially distributed sampling points in aquifers. This space-for-time approach is particularly useful for examining historical NO3- trends in groundwater, since residence times in surficial aquifers are typically on the same order (12) as the six-decade historical trend of increasing nitrogen inputs. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has sampled groundwater in aquifers across the nation, allowing us to evaluate spatial 840

9

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 45, NO. 3, 2011

and temporal trends of NO3- contamination. For this analysis we used 424 groundwater samples, age dated and corrected for denitrification, from 20 surficial aquifer studies done throughout the U.S. (Figure 3). These aquifers are in predominately agricultural watersheds, although several include expanding urban areas (Supporting Information (SI), Table S1).

Temporal and Spatial Patterns of Nitrate in Groundwater The USGS groundwater samples, corrected for denitrification, provide a historical record showing a clear pattern of increasing NO3- recharge concentrations in the U.S. since 1945 (Figures 1 and S1). This pattern corresponds to the increase in industrially fixed fertilizer N use in the U.S. during 1945-2002. A Lowess curve fit to the entire data set indicates that NO3- concentrations increased from about 2 mg L-1 (Note: NO3- concentrations are reported in mg L-1 as N) in the early 1940s to about 15 mg L-1 for samples that recharged in 2002 (Figure 1). Comparing NO3concentrations for the more recent 1983-2002 period with the 1945-1982 period (17) revealed an increase from a median of 4 to 7.5 mg L-1 (P < .001) (Figure 4a). Among

FIGURE 4. Comparisons of (a) NO3- concentrations for the