Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF MISSISSIPPI
Article
Non-Enzymatic #-Linolenic Acid Derivatives from the Sea: Macroalgae as Novel Sources of Phytoprostanes Mariana Barbosa, Jacinta Collado-González, Paula B. Andrade, Federico Ferreres, Patrícia Valentão, Jean-Marie Galano, Thierry Durand, and Angel Gil-Izquierdo J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01904 • Publication Date (Web): 30 Jun 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 6, 2015
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Non-Enzymatic α-Linolenic Acid Derivatives from the Sea: Macroalgae as Novel
2
Sources of Phytoprostanes
3 4
Mariana Barbosa†, Jacinta Collado-González‡, Paula B. Andrade†, Federico Ferreres‡,
5
Patrícia Valentão†, Jean-Marie Galano§, Thierry Durand§, Ángel Gil-Izquierdo‡,*
6 7
†
REQUIMTE/LAQV, Laboratório de Farmacognosia, Departamento de Química,
8
Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, nº 228,
9
4050-313 Porto, Portugal
10
‡
Research Group on Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Department of
11
Food Science and Technology, CEBAS (CSIC), P.O. Box 164, 30100 Campus
12
University Espinardo, Murcia, Spain
13
§
14
of Montpellier - ENSCM, Faculty of Pharmacy, Montpellier, France
Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (IBMM), UMR 5247 - CNRS – University
15 16
*Corresponding author:
17
Tel: +34 968396363; Fax: +34 968396213; E-mail:
[email protected] 18 19
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 2 of 36
20
ABSTRACT
21
Phytoprostanes, autoxidation products of α-linolenic acid, have been studied in several
22
plant species, but information regarding the natural occurrence of this large family of
23
biologically active oxidized lipids in macroalgae is still scarce. In this work, free
24
phytoprostane composition
25
Chlorophyta, Phaeophyta and Rhodophyta was determined through a recently validated
26
UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS method. The phytoprostane profiles varied greatly among all
27
samples, being F1t-phytoprostanes and L1-phytoprostanes the predominant and the
28
minor classes, respectively. No correlation between the amounts of α-linolenic acid in
29
algae material and phytoprostane content was found. Therefore, we hypothesize that the
30
observed variability could be species-specific or result from interspecific interactions.
31
This study provides new insight about the occurrence of phytoprostanes in macroalgae
32
and opens doors for future exploitation of these marine photosynthetic organisms as
33
sources of potentially bioactive oxylipins, encouraging their incorporation in food
34
products, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical preparations for human health.
of twenty-four
macroalgae species
belonging
to
35 36
KEYWORDS: α-Linolenic acid, GC-MS, Macroalgae, Oxidized lipids, Phytoprostanes,
37
UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS.
38
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
39
INTRODUCTION
40
Membrane lipids are major targets of free radical attack. Phytoprostanes are the
41
resulting products of the autoxidation of α-linolenic acid (C18:3 ω3) (1, Figure 1), one
42
of the most abundant polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) in terrestrial higher plant
43
membranes.1
44
phytoprostanes) can be generated depending on the position where the hydrogen
45
abstraction occurs and the oxygen atoms are inserted in the PUFA backbone.2 G1-
46
phytoprostanes are then precursors of different classes of cyclic phytoprostanes, named
47
in analogy with the prostaglandin nomenclature system as A1, B1, D1, E1, F1, dJ1, and
48
L1-phytoprostanes, with the latter being the regioisomer of B1-phytoprostane.3,
49
large family of regio- and stereoisomeric prostaglandin-like compounds has been found
50
to occur constitutively in plants; however, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated
51
under the influence of both biotic and abiotic factors interfere with cellular redox
52
balance and lead to enhanced formation of phytoprostanes, inducing, for instance, the
53
biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, the expression of genes involved in
54
detoxification processes and the regulation of oxidative stress-related mitogen-activated
55
protein kinase (MAPK)-dependent signaling pathway.1,
56
can function not only as defense signals, but also as endogenous mediators capable of
57
preventing cellular damage.5
58
Previous works have already reported the presence of different classes of
59
phytoprostanes in vegetable oils, particularly in linseed and soybean oils, as well as in
60
aqueous pollen extracts.8, 9 Nevertheless, information regarding the natural occurrence
61
of this novel family of biologically active oxidized lipids in macroalgae is still scarce.
62
As far as we know, only Ritter et al.10 have recently described the accumulation of
63
cyclic C18 A1-phytoprostanes in the brown macroalgae Ectocarpus siliculosus
Two
regioisomeric
series
(16-G1-phytoprostanes
5-7
and
9-G1-
4
This
Therefore, these oxylipins
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 4 of 36
64
(Dillwyn) Lyngbye to which copper stress was induced, supporting the occurrence of
65
ROS-mediated lipid peroxidation processes.10
66
Macroalgae, commonly known as seaweeds, are an abundant and heterogeneous group
67
of marine photosynthetic organisms widely used as food in direct human consumption.
68
Besides their key-role in the food sector, macroalgae are also employed in other
69
industrial branches, such as textiles, paints, cosmetics, and more recently as renewable,
70
sustainable and eco-friendly alternative sources for bioethanol production.11
71
Regardless of the large algal biodiversity that remains unexplored, macroalgae have
72
historically been an important group of organisms for marine drug development.12 In
73
fact, researchers have shown that macroalgae are rich sources of nutraceuticals with
74
numerous and remarkable biological activities.13
75
Macroalgae are usually grouped into Chlorophyta (green algae), Phaeophyta (brown
76
algae) and Rhodophyta (red algae), according to the presence of specific pigments.
77
These marine organisms are rich sources of bioactive compounds from both primary
78
and secondary metabolism, among which fatty acids are highlighted.14,
79
marine algae present low lipid content (1-5% of dry matter), PUFA account for almost
80
half of the lipid fraction.15 Several studies have shown that despite PUFA profiles are
81
highly variable between and within algal groups, linoleic (C18:2 ω6), linolenic (C18:3
82
ω3), arachidonic (C20:4 ω6), eicosapentaenoic (C20:5 ω3) and docosahexaenoic (C22:6
83
ω3) acids are predominant in macroalgae.16-20
84
Marine ecosystem is characterized by broad fluctuations of environmental conditions
85
that can be strong stress inducers in macroalgae populations, including extreme
86
temperatures, rapid salinity and nutrient changes, dessication, intense sunlight, among
87
others.21
15
Although
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
88
Taken together, these observations suggest that macroalgae can be valuable sources of
89
phytoprostanes and potentially used as biomarkers of oxidative stress and/or present
90
important biological effects.9, 22 Due to the fact that macroalgae are an integral part of
91
the Asian food and recently became a popular addition to some Western diets, our goal
92
was to assess the occurrence of free phytoprostanes, readily bioavailable and absorbed
93
by the human body, in twenty-four species of macroalgae belonging to Chlorophyta,
94
Phaeophyta and Rhodophyta. The reason for this characterization was based on the fact
95
that humans do not possess esterases in the gastrointestinal tract, rendering impossible
96
to absorb the esterified form of phytoprostanes.23
97
A fast, selective and robust ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to
98
triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) method, previously
99
validated by Collado-González et al.24, was employed. Moreover, all macroalgae
100
species selected for this work were characterized for their composition in α-linolenic
101
acid (1) by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) after alkaline hydrolysis
102
and derivatization.
103 104
MATERIALS AND METHODS
105
Standards and reagents. Ten phytoprostanes standards (9-F1t-phytoprostane
106
(2), 9-epi-9-F1t-phytoprostane (3), ent-16-F1t-phytoprostane (4), ent-16-epi-16-F1t-
107
phytoprostane (5), 9-D1t-phytoprostane (6), 9-epi-9-D1t-phytoprostane (7), 16-B1-
108
phytoprostane (8), ent-16-B1-phytoprostane (9), 9-L1-phytoprostane (10) and ent-9-L1-
109
phytoprostane (11)) (Figure 1) were synthesized according to our previous procedures.
110
25-27
111
The d4-15-F2t-isoprostane (8-isoPGF2α-d4) (containing four deuterium atoms at
positions 3,3ʹ,4, and 4ʹ) was purchased from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI, US).
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 36
112
Authentic standards of fatty acids methyl esters (FAME) for GC-MS analysis were
113
obtained from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, US).
114
Two types of solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges were used in this study:
115
Chromabond C18 columns (1000 mg/6 mL) were obtained from Macherey-Nagel
116
(Düren, Germany) and Strata X-AW (500 mg/3 mL) from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA,
117
US).
118
(hydroxymethyl)-methane (BIS-TRIS), chloroform, isooctane and boron trifluoride
119
(BF3) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, US). Methanol was acquired
120
from VWR (Fontenay-sous-Bois, France), acetonitrile was obtained from Merck
121
(Darmstadt, Germany) and n-hexane was purchased from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain).
122
All LC-MS grade solvents were obtained from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, US). Water
123
was treated in a Milli-Q water purification system from (Millipore, Bedford, MA, US).
Butylated
hydroxyanisole
(BHA),
bis-(2-hydroxyethyl)-amino-tris-
124 125
Macroalgae samples. Macroalgae samples consisted of three Chlorophyta, five
126
Rhodophyta and sixteen Phaeophyta species collected between 2010 and 2013 (Table
127
1). With the exceptions of G. vermiculophylla, S. latissima and Ulva sp., which were
128
cultivated in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) systems and provided by
129
CIIMAR/CIMAR – Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, all samples were
130
randomly collected during low tide periods from different places of the west coast of
131
Portugal, each sample corresponding to a mixture of three to four individuals in the
132
same stage of development. In order to prevent sample alterations, after collection they
133
were immediately placed on ice and transported to the laboratory in insulated, sealed ice
134
boxes, to protect them from heat, air, and light exposure. Macroalgae were then
135
carefully and quickly washed with NaCl aqueous solution (3.5%) to remove epiphytes
136
and encrusting material, at room temperature, without exposure to direct light, and kept
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
137
at –20 ºC, prior to lyophilization. The dried material was powdered (< 910 μm) and kept
138
in the dark, in a desiccator, until it was subjected to extraction. No alteration (color,
139
smell, humidity) of the samples was noticed during storage.
140 141
α-Linolenic acid and extract derivatization for GC-MS analysis. The
142
extraction of α-linolenic acid was performed as previously described, with slight
143
modifications.28 Briefly, 0.25 g of the dried macroalgae were extracted with 25 mL of
144
chloroform:methanol (2:1), under magnetic stirring at 500 rpm, for 10 min, at 40 °C.
145
The extraction procedure was repeated five times and the resulting extracts were pooled
146
and concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure (40 °C). The residue was then
147
hydrolyzed with 1 mL of KOH methanolic solution (11 g/L), at 90 °C, for 10 min. The
148
free fatty acids originally present and those resulting from the alkaline hydrolysis were
149
derivatized to their methyl esters with 1 mL of BF3 methanolic solution (10%), at 90 °C,
150
for 10 min. FAME were purified with 2×10 mL of isooctane and anhydrous sodium
151
sulphate was added to assure the total absence of water. The resulting extract was
152
evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen and dissolved in 200 μL of isooctane.
153
Each macroalgae species was assayed in triplicate.
154 155
GC-MS analysis of α-linolenic acid. GC-MS analysis was performed following
156
a previously established method.28 Derivatized extracts (1 μL) were analyzed using a
157
Varian CP-3800 gas chromatograph (Walnut Creek, CA, US) equipped with a Varian
158
Saturn 4000 mass selective detector (Walnut Creek, CA, US) and a Saturn GC/MS
159
workstation software version 6.8. The column used was a 30 x 0.25 mm, i.d., 0.25 µm,
160
VF-5 ms (Varian, Walnut Creek, CA, US). The injector port was heated to 250 °C.
161
Injections were performed in split mode, with a ratio of 1/40. The carrier gas was
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 36
162
Helium C-60 (Gasin, Portugal), at a constant flow of 1 mL/min. The oven temperature
163
was set at 40 °C for 1 min, then increased 5 °C/min to 250 °C, 3 °C/min to 300 °C and
164
held for 15 min. All mass spectra were acquired in EI mode. Ionization was maintained
165
off during the first 4 min, to avoid solvent overloading. The Ion Trap detector was set as
166
follows: transfer line, manifold and trap temperatures were respectively 280, 50 and 180
167
°C. The mass ranged from m/z 50 to 600, with a scan rate of 6 scan/s. The emission
168
current was 50 μA, and the electron multiplier was set in relative mode to auto tune
169
procedure. The maximum ionization time was 25,000 μs, with an ionization storage
170
level of m/z 35. The analysis was performed in Full Scan mode. Identification of α-
171
linolenic acid was achieved by comparison of its retention index and mass spectra with
172
those from pure standard injected under the same conditions, and from NIST 05 MS
173
Library Database. The amount of methyl ester of α-linolenic acid present in the samples
174
was achieved from the calibration curve of the respective standard prepared in
175
isooctane.
176 177
Phytoprostane extraction. Each pulverized macroalgae sample (1 g) was
178
crushed in a mortar and pestle with 5 mL methanol (0.1% BHA). The sample extracts
179
were centrifuged at 2,000 g during 10 min and the supernatants underwent SPE using a
180
Chromabond C18 column. Briefly, 10 mL of n-hexane were added to 1 mL of the
181
filtered sample and then rediluted in 2 mL of methanol and 2 mL of BIS-TRIS buffer.24
182
The emulsion of each macroalgae sample was applied to a previously conditioned and
183
equilibrated Strata-X-AW cartridge. After loading the column with the emulsion, 2 mL
184
of n-hexane, followed by 2 mL of Milli-Q water, 2 mL of methanol:Milli-Q water (1:3)
185
and 2 mL of acetonitrile were applied for removing undesired compounds. Target
186
compounds were eluted with 1 mL of methanol and dried under nitrogen stream. The
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
187
dried residue of each macroalgae sample was reconstituted with 200 µL of a mixture of
188
A/B solvents (90:10, v/v), solvent A being Milli-Q water/0.01% acetic acid and solvent
189
B methanol/0.01% acetic acid. Reconstituted extracts were sonicated, filtered through a
190
0.45 µm filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, US) and further injected and analyzed in an
191
UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS apparatus.
192 193
UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS analysis of free phytoprostanes. Separation of
194
phytoprostanes present in macroalgae samples was performed using an UHPLC coupled
195
to 6460 QqQ-MS/MS (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany), as previously
196
described.24 The column used was a 50 x 2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 µm, BEH C18 (Waters,
197
Milford, MA, US). The column temperature was 6 ºC. The mobile phases employed
198
were solvent A (Milli-Q water/acetic acid (99.99:0.01, v/v)) and solvent B
199
(methanol/acetic acid (99.99:0.01, v/v)). The elution was performed at a flow rate of 0.2
200
mL/min using the following gradient profile: 60% B at 0 min, 62% B at 2 min, 62.5% B
201
at 4 min, reaching 65% B at 8 min, and returning to the initial conditions at 8.01 min.
202
The MS analysis was applied in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) negative ESI
203
mode. ESI conditions and ion optics were as previously described.24 Data acquisition
204
and processing were performed using the MassHunter software version B.04.00
205
(Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The quantitation of phytoprostanes
206
detected in macroalgae was performed using authentic standards of compounds 2, 3, 8
207
and 10. The synthetic isoprostane d4-15-F2t-isoprostane (8-isoPGF2α-d4) was used as
208
internal standard.
209 210
Statistical Analysis. All the analytical determinations were performed in
211
triplicate and the mean values were reported. All values obtained were compared using
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 36
212
analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey) and unpaired t-test. Pearson
213
correlations were calculated according to GraphPad Prism 6 Software, Inc. (San Diego,
214
CA, US). One-way ANOVA, unpaired t-test and principal component analysis (PCA)
215
were performed using IBM SPSS Statistic for windows Version 22.0 (Armonk, NY,
216
US). Differences at p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
217 218
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
219
The field of phytoprostanes was opened in 2,000, and currently is still in its infancy. As
220
far as we know, our work is the first report of different naturally occurring classes of
221
free phytoprostanes in twenty-four macroalgae species belonging to Chlorophyta,
222
Phaeophyta and Rhodophyta collected along the west coast of Portugal and from IMTA
223
systems. Likewise, this is the first time a correlation between α-linolenic acid levels and
224
its autoxidation products was ever tried in algae material.
225
Occurrence of α-linolenic acid in macroalgae. Although the fatty acid profiles
226
of some of the target species in this work have already been characterized, intra-specific
227
variability is common in macroalgae coming from different geographical locations
228
and/or exposure to diverse abiotic factors, resulting in different PUFA profiles.18 In this
229
work we were able to identify and quantitate α-linolenic acid (1) in the twenty-four
230
selected macroalgae species (Table 2). The content of this compound ranged between
231
ca. 0.7 and 5.6 g/kg of dry algae, C. tamariscifolia and U. lactuca presenting,
232
respectively, the lowest and the highest amounts. Indeed, previous studies have reported
233
that members of the order Ulvales presented compound 1 as the characteristic PUFA.17,
234
18
235
importance of assessing the occurrence of its autoxidation products, the phytoprostanes.
The presence of compound 1 in all the analyzed species enables and emphasizes the
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
236
Occurrence of free phytoprostanes in macroalgae. The analysis of
237
phytoprostanes in natural matrices is extremely challenging, requiring highly sensitive
238
and specific tools for their profiling and characterization.29 Moreover, the great diversity
239
granted by the presence of racemic mixtures of phytoprostanes increases the complexity
240
of these analyses. In this work, a fast, accurate and robust UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS
241
method previously developed by Collado-González et al.24 for quantitative and
242
qualitative determination of free phytoprostanes in foodstuffs was employed.
243
Among the ten available phytoprostane standards, only three were detected in the
244
analyzed macroalgae samples (Table 2). Neither 16-series of F1t-phytoprostanes nor 9-
245
series of D1t-phytoprostanes were detected in the studied species. Phytoprostane identity
246
was confirmed according to their molecular masses, the precursor ions (m/z 327.2 and
247
m/z 307.2), the characteristic MS/MS fragmentation product ions and the corresponding
248
retention times. The mass spectrometric information of the phytoprostanes detected in
249
one macroalgae sample (C. tomentosum) is summarized in Figure 2. Compounds 2 and
250
3 (Figure 2A) showed the same transition from the precursor ion at m/z [M-H]− 327.2 to
251
the product ion at m/z 171.2 (Figure 2B and 2C). Thus, their identification was only
252
possible by the comparison of their retention times: compound 2 eluted at 1.75 min,
253
while compound 3 eluted at 1.93 min (Figure 2A and 2B). Contrary to prostaglandins,
254
phytoprostanes are non-enzymatically formed as regio- and stereoisomeric mixtures.3
255
The analytical conditions employed in this study did not allow the enantiomers
256
separation. Therefore, compounds 8 and 10 (Figure 2A) were identified and quantitated
257
according to their specific transitions from the precursor ion m/z [M-H]− 307.2 to the
258
product ions m/z [M-H]– 235.2 and m/z [M-H]– 185.2, respectively (Figure 2D and 2E).
259
The qualitative profile of phytoprostanes found in the analyzed macroalgae samples
260
showed great variability among the three phyla (Chlorophyta, Phaeophyta and
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 12 of 36
261
Rhodophyta) and even between species belonging to the same genus, i.e., compounds 2
262
and 3 were detected in F. spiralis, but in F. serratus and F. guiryi none of the studied
263
phytoprostanes was identified.
264
In the three studied green macroalgae (C. tomentosum, U. lactuca and Ulva sp.), as well
265
as in two of the red (S. coronopifolius and G. vermiculophylla) and in eight of the
266
brown species (C. spongiosus, F. spiralis, L. ochroleuca, P. pavonica, S. latissima, S.
267
polyschides, S. vulgare and S. scoparium), compounds 2 and 3 were identified. Also,
268
compound 8 was detected in four of the brown species (P. pavonica, S. latissima, S.
269
vulgare and S. scoparium). The brown macroalgae B. bifurcata contained only
270
compound 8. None of the screened phytoprostanes were detected in ten macroalgae
271
species (A. armata, C. tamariscifolia, C. usneoides, F. guiryi, F. serratus, Gigartina sp.,
272
H. filicina, P. canaliculata, P. cartilagineum and S. muticum). The species C.
273
spongiosus and C. tomentosum exhibited the higher diversity in phytoprostanes.
274
The determination of phytoprostane levels in macroalgae is of extreme importance,
275
stimulating the exploitation and characterization of new natural dietary sources of these
276
compounds.
277
The amount of phytoprostanes found in the analyzed samples is shown in Table 2. F1t-
278
phytoprostanes were the dominant class determined in this study, while L1-
279
phytoprostanes were only detected in two macroalgae species and at very low levels.
280
Concerning to each phytoprostane class, both compounds 2 and 3 were found in higher
281
concentration in the brown macroalgae S. latissima (ca. 701 and 668 ng/100 g of dry
282
algae, respectively); F. spiralis exhibited the lowest amount of these phytoprostanes (ca.
283
19 and 17 ng/100 g of dry algae, respectively). The sample with the lowest content of
284
compound 8 was S. vulgare (ca. 4 ng/100 g of dry algae), while C. tomentosum was
285
found to have the highest amount (ca. 14 ng/100 g of dry algae). C. spongiosus and C.
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
286
tomentosum were the only samples that presented compound 10 (ca. 5 and 6 ng/100 g of
287
dry algae, respectively).
288
As observed with the qualitative profile, the quantitation of total phytoprostanes in the
289
studied macroalgae species revealed significant variability. The total phytoprostanes
290
content ranged between ca. 6 and 1,381 ng/100 g of dry algae. The macroalgae species
291
showing the highest amount of phytoprostanes (S. latissima) was from IMTA systems.
292
However, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the advantages of IMTA for obtaining
293
higher yields of phytoprostanes, as no marine counterpart of this species was analyzed.
294
To the best of our knowledge, no information has been published before on the content
295
of naturally occurring free phytoprostanes in macroalgae. Therefore, the results obtained
296
can only be compared with those of previous work performed on plant material and
297
other foodstuffs. Karg et al.9 found that either D1 or F1t-phytoprostanes were the
298
dominant classes in vegetable oils, while B1 and L1-phytoprostanes, including their
299
enantiomers, were the minor components.9 More recently, Collado-González et al.24
300
reported that F1t-phytoprostanes were the main class in the green table olive
301
“Manzanilla de Sevilla”.24 Likewise, in macroalgae, F1t-phytoprostanes were the main
302
phytoprostanes detected. This class of compounds was also found to occur in leaves,
303
flowers and roots of taxonomically distinct plant species, ranging from 43 to 1,380 ng/g
304
of dry weight.30 Although we are aware structural differentiation in macroalgae is likely
305
to be accompanied by variation in chemical composition, the present work used full
306
algae individuals in the same stage of development, rendering impossible to conclude
307
about the presence and distribution of phytoprostanes in different morphological parts
308
of the selected species.
309
Although it was theoretically expected to find both 9- and 16-series of F1-
310
phytoprostanes in equal amounts, we were not able to assure this hypothetical relation
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 14 of 36
311
in the studied macroalgae. In fact, previous studies only reported that 9- and 16-series
312
(previously referred as types II and I, respectively) of A1, B1 and E1-phytoprostanes
313
were of equal abundance in different plant tissues.9 Moreover, Imbusch et al.
314
that due to the isomeric complexity of F1-phytoprostanes, identification and
315
quantification of this class of compounds is technically difficult. Therefore, studies
316
reporting the presence of F1-phytoprostanes focused essentially on the differentiation
317
between free and esterified isomers.9, 30-32 The analytical methodology employed in this
318
work was able to differentiate 9-F1-phytoprostane and 16-F1-phytoprostane.24 Likewise,
319
the occurrence of these regioisomers was not of equal proportions: in refined sunflower
320
oil the 9-F1-phytoprostane was found in 44.48 ng/mL while the 16-F1-phytoprostane
321
was found in 24.40 ng/mL of; in 0.8º and 0.4º extra virgin oil 9-F1-phytoprostane were
322
not detected whereas 16-F1-phytoprostane was found in 2.13 ng/mL and 3.70 ng/mL,
323
respectively.24 The reason for these differences is still unclear and more studies are
324
needed to clarify the underlying response mechanisms of individual free phytoprostanes
325
in natural products.
31
stated
326 327
Statistical analysis. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to
328
determine possible distribution patterns of the identified and quantitated phytoprostanes
329
(2, 3, 8 and 10) in all of the analyzed macroalgae samples. PCA of normalized
330
phytoprostane dataset explained 92.9% of total variations, PC1 accounting for 64.0% of
331
the variance and PC2 for 28.9%. Five groups were distinguished (Figure 3A). One
332
group (G1) includes C. spongiosus and C. tomentosum, the only two macroalgae species
333
in which compound 10 was identified. G2 contains G. vermiculophylla, S.
334
coronopifolius, U. lactuca and Ulva sp., which presented similar amounts of both
335
compounds 2 and 3, while G3 comprises the three macroalgae species that clearly stood
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
336
out for their high levels in these exact phytoprostanes (S. latissima, S. scoparium and S.
337
polyschides). The low amounts of compounds 2 and 3 in F. spiralis and L. ochroleuca
338
led to the inclusion of these two species in another group (G4), together with A. armata,
339
C. tamariscifolia, C. usneoides, F. guiryi, F. serratus, Gigartina sp., H. filicina, P.
340
canaliculata, P. cartilagineum and S. muticum, in which none of the available
341
phytoprostanes was identified. Finally, B. bifurcata, P. pavonica and S. vulgare were
342
grouped together (G5) due to their similar amounts of compound 8 (Figure 3). The total
343
amount of phytoprostanes is visibly influenced by the levels of both compounds 2 and
344
3, confirming that F1t-phytoprostane is the dominant phytoprostane class in the analyzed
345
samples (Figure 3B).
346
Pearson correlations were calculated in order to establish a potential relationship
347
between the presence of α-linolenic acid (1) in algae material and phytoprostane
348
composition. Our results showed a lack of correlation between the amount of compound
349
1 and total phytoprostane content (r=-0.318). However, the possibility of enzymatic
350
oxidation of compound 1 cannot be ignored. Although this compound is prone to
351
undergo autoxidation reactions, it can also be released from membrane lipids and
352
metabolized by the enzymatic action of lipoxygenases (LOX).33 In fact, several studies
353
have already reported the presence of diverse structurally unique oxylipins from
354
enzymatic routes in macroalgae.34-39 Also recently, Barden et al.40 conducted a clinical
355
trial with healthy volunteers whose diet was supplemented with linseed oil. They
356
detected high levels of phytoprostanes, but they were not able to assess whether
357
phytoprostanes increased due to enhanced concentration of compound 1 or by direct
358
intake from linseed oil.40
359
Altogether, these observations suggest that the large variations observed in
360
phytoprostane composition can be partially explained by intrinsic factors (e.g.,
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 16 of 36
361
physiological variations within algae organs) and/or extrinsic factors (e.g., geographical
362
origin or area of cultivation, seasonal and environmental variations, time of harvest,
363
water temperature, salinity levels, and processing methods).
364 365
At present, the interest in phytoprostanes comprises two general areas: as biomarkers of
366
oxidative stress in plant-derived foodstuffs and as bioactive mediators with potential
367
benefits in human health. As example, Collado-González et al.41 have recently reported
368
that some phytoprostanes could be considered as early candidate biomarkers of water
369
stress in olive tree.41 Concerning to their biological potential, studies have been shown
370
that certain phytoprostane classes were active in various experimental models. 9, 22, 42, 43
371
However, further studies are required using different natural dietary sources of
372
phytoprostanes to evaluate the real effect of these oxidized lipids on human health.
373
In this regard, our study represents a first approach in the assessment of different
374
naturally occurring classes of free phytoprostanes in macroalgae. The rational
375
exploitation of photosynthetic marine organisms as valuable sources of prominent
376
oxidized lipids is encouraged for future application as substitutes of chemically
377
synthesized oxylipins and as pharmaceuticals and/or nutraceuticals, providing a
378
complementary treatment for chronic diseases, including neurodegenerative and
379
inflammation-related pathologies.
380 381
ABBREVIATIONS USED
382
BHA,
383
(hydroxymethyl)-methane); IMTA, integrated multi-trophic aquaculture; MAPK,
384
mitogen-activated protein kinase; MRM, multiple reaction monitoring; PCA, principal
385
component analysis; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SPE, solid-phase extraction;
butylated
hydroxyanisole;
BIS-TRIS,
bis-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-amino-tris-
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
386
UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS,
387
quadrupole-mass spectrometry.
ultra-high
performance
liquid
chromatography-triple-
388 389
FUNDING
390
This work received financial support from the European Union (FEDER funds through
391
COMPETE) and National Funds (FCT, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) through
392
project UID/QUI/50006/2013. The work also received financial support from CYTED
393
Programme (Ref. 112RT0460) CORNUCOPIA Thematic Network and projects
394
AGL2011-23690, AGL2013-45922-C2-1-R and AGL2013-45922-C2-2-R (CICYT). To
395
all financing sources the authors are greatly indebted. M. Barbosa and J. Collado-
396
Gonzalez are indebted to FCT and MINECO (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
397
Español) for their grants, SFRH/BD/95861/2013 and BES-2011-048401, respectively.
398
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
399
REFERENCES
400
1.
401 402
Page 18 of 36
Mueller, M. J. Archetype signals in plants: the phytoprostanes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 441-448.
2.
Durand, T.; Bultel-Poncé, V.; Guy, A.; Berger, S.; Mueller, M. J.; Galano, J.-M.
403
New bioactive oxylipins formed by non-enzymatic free-radical-catalyzed
404
pathways: the phytoprostanes. Lipids. 2009, 44, 875-888.
405
3.
Jahn, U.; Galano, J.-M.; Durand, T. A cautionary note on the correct structure
406
assignment of phytoprostanes and the emergence of a new prostane ring system.
407
Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes Essent. Fatty Acids. 2010, 82, 83-86.
408
4.
Porta, A.; Chiesa, F.; Quaroni, M.; Persico, M.; Moratti, R.; Zanoni, G.; Vidari,
409
G. A divergent enantioselective synthesis of 9-J1-phytoprostane and 9-A1-
410
phytoprostane methyl ester. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 2111-2119.
411
5.
Loeffler, C.; Berger, S.; Guy, A.; Durand, T.; Bringmann, G.; Dreyer, M.; von
412
Rad, U.; Durner, J.; Mueller, M. B1-phytoprostanes trigger plant defense and
413
detoxification responses. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 328-340.
414
6.
415 416
Savchenko, T.; Zastrijnaja, O.; Klimov, V. Oxylipins and plant abiotic stress resistance. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2014, 79, 362-375.
7.
Thoma, I.; Loeffler, C.; Sinha, A.; Gupta, M.; Krischke, M.; Steffan, B.; Roitsch,
417
T.; Mueller M. Cyclopentenone isoprostanes induced by reactive oxygen species
418
trigger defense gene activation and phytoalexin accumulation in plants. Plant J.
419
2003, 34, 363-375.
420
8.
Traidl-Hoffmann, C.; Mariani, V.; Hochrein, H.; Karg, K.; Wagner, H.; Ring, J.;
421
Mueller, M. J.; Jakob, T.; Behrendt, H. Pollen-associated phytoprostanes inhibit
422
dendritic cell interleukin-l2 production and augment T helper type 2 cell
423
polarization. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 627-636. 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 36
424
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
9.
Karg, K.; Dirsch, V.; Vollmar, A. M.; Cracowski, J.-L.; Laporte, F.; Mueller, M.
425
J. Biologically active oxidized lipids (phytoprostanes) in the plant diet and
426
parenteral lipid nutrition. Free Radical Res. 2007, 41, 25-37.
427
10.
Ritter, A.; Dittami, S. M.; Goulitquer, S.; Correa, J. A.; Boyen, C.; Potin, P.;
428
Tonon, T. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of copper stress acclimation
429
in Ectocarpus siliculosus highlights signaling and tolerance mechanisms in
430
brown algae. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 1-17.
431
11.
John, R. P.; Anisha, G. S.; Nampoothiri, K. M.; Pandey, A. Micro and
432
macroalgal biomass: a renewable source for bioethanol. Bioresour. Technol.
433
2011, 102, 186-193.
434
12.
Leal, M. C.; Munro, M. H.; Blunt, J. W.; Puga, J.; Jesus, B.; Calado, R.; Rosa,
435
R.; Madeira, C. Biogeography and biodiscovery hotspots of macroalgal marine
436
natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013, 30, 1380-1390.
437
13.
review. J. Appl. Phycol. 2004, 16, 245−262.
438 439
Smit, A. J. Medicinal and pharmaceutical uses of seaweed natural products: a
14.
Kadam, S. U.; Tiwari, B. K.; O’Donnell, C. P. Application of novel extraction
440
technologies for bioactives from marine algae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61,
441
4667-4675.
442
15.
Lordan, S.; Ross, R. P.; Stanton, C. Marine bioactives as functional food
443
ingredients: potential to reduce the incidence of chronic diseases. Mar. Drugs.
444
2011, 9, 1056-1100.
445
16.
Andrade, P. B.; Barbosa, M.; Matos, R. P.; Lopes, G.; Vinholes, J.; Mouga, T.;
446
Valentão, P. Valuable compounds in macroalgae extracts. Food Chem. 2013,
447
138, 1819-1828.
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
448
17.
Page 20 of 36
Kumari, P.; Bijo, A.; Mantri, V. A.; Reddy, C.; Jha, B. Fatty acid profiling of
449
tropical marine macroalgae: an analysis from chemotaxonomic and nutritional
450
perspectives. Phytochemistry. 2013, 86, 44-56.
451
18.
Pereira, H.; Barreira, L.; Figueiredo, F.; Custódio, L.; Vizetto-Duarte, C.; Polo,
452
C.; Rešek, E.; Engelen, A.; Varela, J. Polyunsaturated fatty acids of marine
453
macroalgae: potential for nutritional and pharmaceutical applications. Mar.
454
Drugs. 2012, 10, 1920-1935.
455
19.
Schmid, M.; Guihéneuf, F.; Stengel, D. B. Fatty acid contents and profiles of 16
456
macroalgae collected from the Irish Coast at two seasons. J. Appl. Phycol. 2014,
457
26, 451-463.
458
20.
van Ginneken, V. J.; Helsper, J.; de Visser, W.; van Keulen, H.; Brandenburg,
459
W. A. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in various macroalgal species from north
460
Atlantic and tropical seas. Lipids Health Dis. 2011, 10, 104.
461
21.
Sudatti, D. B.; Fujii, M. T.; Rodrigues, S. V.; Turra, A.; Pereira, R. C. Effects of
462
abiotic factors on growth and chemical defenses in cultivated clones of
463
Laurencia dendroidea J. Agardh (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Mar. Biol.
464
(Heidelberg, Ger.). 2011, 158, 1439-1446.
465
22.
Minghetti, L.; Salvi, R.; Lavinia Salvatori, M.; Ajmone-Cat, M. A.; De Nuccio,
466
C.; Visentin, S.; Bultel-Poncé, V.; Oger, C.; Guy, A.; Galano, J.-M.; Greco, A.;
467
Bernardo, A.; Durand, T. Nonenzymatic oxygenated metabolites of α-linolenic
468
acid B1- and L1-phytoprostanes protect immature neurons from oxidant injury
469
and promote differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitors through PPAR-γ
470
activation. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2014, 73, 41-50.
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 36
471
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
23.
Lafay, S.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Manach, C.; Morand, C.; Besson, C.; Scalbert, A.
472
Chlorogenic acid is absorbed in its intact form in the stomach of rats. J. Nutr.
473
2006, 136, 1192-1197.
474
24.
Collado-González, J.; Medina, S.; Durand, T.; Guy, A.; Galano, J.-M.;
475
Torrecillas, A.; Ferreres, F.; Gil-Izquierdo, A. New UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS
476
method for quantitative and qualitative determination of free phytoprostanes in
477
foodstuffs of commercial olive and sunflower oils. Food Chem. 2015, 178, 212-
478
220.
479
25.
480 481
El Fangour, S.; Guy, A.; Vidal, J.-P.; Rossi, J.-C.; Durand, T. Total synthesis of phytoprostane F1 and its 16 epimer. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2105-2108.
26.
El Fangour, S.; Guy, A.; Despres, V.; Vidal, J.-P.; Rossi, J.-C.; Durand, T. Total
482
syntheses of the eight diastereoisomers of the syn-anti-syn phytoprostanes F1
483
types I and II. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2498-2503.
484
27.
Pinot, E.; Guy, A.; Fournial, A.; Balas, L.; Rossi, J.-C.; Durand, T. Total
485
synthesis
486
phytoprostanes E1 type II and of the 15-E2t-isoprostanes. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
487
73, 3063-3069.
488
28.
of
the
four
enantiomerically
pure
diasteroisomers
of
the
Ribeiro, B.; de Pinho, P. G.; Andrade, P. B.; Baptista, P.; Valentão, P. Fatty acid
489
composition of wild edible mushrooms species: a comparative study. Microchem
490
J. 2009, 93, 29–35.
491
29.
492 493
Thoma, I.; Krischke, M.; Loeffler, C.; Mueller, M. The isoprostanoid pathway in plants. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 2004, 128, 135-148.
30.
Imbusch, R.; Mueller, M. J. Formation of isoprostane F(2)-like compounds
494
(phytoprostanes F(1)) from alpha-linolenic acid in plants. Free Radical Biol.
495
Med. 2000, 28, 720-726.
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
496
31.
Page 22 of 36
Imbusch, R.; Mueller, M. J. Analysis of oxidative stress and wound-inducible
497
dinor isoprostanes F1 (phytoprostanes F1) in plants. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124,
498
1293-1303.
499
32.
Sattler, S. E.; Mène-Saffrané, L.; Farmer, E. E.; Krischke, M.; Mueller, M. J.;
500
DellaPenna, D. Nonenzymatic lipid peroxidation reprograms gene expression
501
and activates defense markers in Arabidopsis tocopherol-deficient mutants.
502
Plant Cell. 2006, 18, 3706-3720.
503
33.
504 505
Kumari, P.; Reddy, R.; Jha, B. Quantification of selected endogenous hydroxyoxylipins from tropical marine macroalgae. Mar. Biotechnol. 2014, 16, 74-87.
34.
Gerwick, W. H.; Proteau, P. J.; Nagle, D. G.; Wise, M. L.; Jiang, Z. D.; Bernart,
506
M. W.; Hamberg, M. Biologically active oxylipins from seaweeds.
507
Hydrobiologia. 1993, 260, 653-665.
508
35.
509 510
Proteau, P. J.; Gerwick, W. H. Divinyl ethers and hydroxy fatty acids from three species of Laminaria (brown algae). Lipids. 1993, 28, 783-787.
36.
Todd, J. S.; Proteau, P. J.; Gerwick, W. H. The absolute configuration of
511
ecklonialactones A, B, and E, novel oxylipins from brown algae of the genera
512
Ecklonia and Egregia. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 171-174.
513
37.
Jiang, Z.-D.; Gerwick, W. H. Novel oxylipins from the temperate red alga
514
Polyneura latissima: evidence for an arachidonate 9 (S)-lipoxygenase. Lipids.
515
1997, 32, 231-235.
516
38.
Kousaka, K.; Ogi, N.; Akazawa, Y.; Fujieda, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Takada, Y.;
517
Kimura, J. Novel oxylipin metabolites from the brown alga Eisenia bicyclis. J.
518
Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1318-1323.
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 36
519
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
39.
Choi, H.; Proteau, P. J.; Byrum, T.; Gerwick, W. H. Cymatherelactone and
520
cymatherols A− C, polycyclic oxylipins from the marine brown alga Cymathere
521
triplicata. Phytochemistry. 2012, 73, 134-141.
522
40.
Barden, A. E.; Croft, K. D.; Durand, T.; Guy, A.; Mueller, M. J.; Mori, T. A.
523
Flaxseed oil supplementation increases plasma F1-phytoprostanes in healthy
524
men. J. nutr. 2009, 139, 1890-1895.
525
41.
Collado-González, J.; Pérez-López, D.; Memmi, H.; Gijón, M. C.; Medina, S.;
526
Durand, T.; Guy, A.; Galano, J.-M.; Ferreres, F.; Torrecillas, A.; Gil-Izquierdo,
527
A. Water deficit during pit hardening enhances phytoprostanes content, a plant
528
biomarker of oxidative stress, in extra virgin olive oil. J Agric Food Chem. 2015,
529
63, 3784-3792.
530
42.
Gutermuth, J.; Bewersdorff, M.; Traidl-Hoffmann, C.; Ring, J.; Mueller, M. J.;
531
Behrendt, H.; Jakob, T. Immunomodulatory effects of aqueous birch pollen
532
extracts and phytoprostanes on primary immune responses in vivo. J. Allergy
533
Clin. Immunol. 2007, 120, 293-299.
534
43.
Barden, A.; Mas, E.; Henry, P.; Durand, T.; Galano, J.-M.; Roberts, L. J.; Croft,
535
K. D.; Mori, T. A. The effects of oxidation products of arachidonic acid and n3
536
fatty acids on vascular and platelet function. Free Radical Res. 2011, 45, 469-
537
476.
538
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 24 of 36
539
FIGURE CAPTIONS
540
Figure 1. Chemical structures of α-linolenic acid (1) and of the studied phytoprostanes:
541
9-F1t-phytoprostane (2), 9-epi-9-F1t-phytoprostane (3), ent-16-F1t-phytoprostane (4),
542
ent-16-epi-16-F1t-phytoprostane (5), 9-D1t-phytoprostane (6), 9-epi-9-D1t-phytoprostane
543
(7), 16-B1-phytoprostane (8), ent-16-B1-phytoprostane (9), 9-L1-phytoprostane (10) and
544
ent-9-L1-phytoprostane (11).
545 546
Figure 2. (A) Representative UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS chromatogram of detected
547
phytoprostanes (C. tomentosum) and MRM transitions for quantitation of (B) 9-F1t-
548
phytoprostane (2), (C) 9-epi-9-F1t-phytoprostane (3), (D) 16-B1-phytoprostane (8) and
549
(E) 9-L1-phytoprostane (10).
550 551
Figure 3. Projection of macroalgae (A) (variables: A. armata (AA), B. bifurcata (BB),
552
C. spongiosus (CS), C. tomentosum (Ctom), C. tamariscifolia (CT), C. usneoides (CU),
553
F. guiryi (FG), F. serratus (Fser), F. spiralis (Fspi), Gigartina sp. (Gsp), G.
554
vermiculophylla (GV), H. filicina (HL), L. ochroleuca (LO), P. pavonica (PP), P.
555
canaliculata (PC), P. cartilagineum (Pcart), S. latissima (SL), S. polyschides (SP), S.
556
muticum (SM), S. vulgare (SV), S. coronopfolius (SC), S. scoparium (SS), U. lactuca
557
(UL) and Ulva sp. (Usp) and loadings (B) by phytoprostane composition (variables: 2,
558
3, 8 and 10) into the plane composed by the principal components PC1 and PC2
559
containing 92.9% of the total variance.
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 1. Characterization of Macroalgae Samples. Phylum Chlorophyta
Species
Origin
Location
Date of collection
Codium tomentosum Stackhouse
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
April 2011
Ulva lactuca Linnaeus
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
August 2011
Ulva sp.
IMTA
N 41°27’11.20, W 8°46’28.29"
July 2012
Asparagopsis armata Harvey
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
June 2010
Gigartina sp.
Praia da Amorosa
N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"
December 2013
Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Ohmi) Papenfuss
IMTA
N 41°27’11.20, W 8°46’28.29"
July 2012
Plocamium cartilagineum (Linnaeus) P. S. Dixo
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
July 2012
Sphaerococcus coronopifolius Stackhouse
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
June 2010
Bifurcaria bifurcata R. Ross
Praia da Amorosa
N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"
December 2013
Cladostephus spongiosus (Hudson) C. Agardh
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
June 2010
Cystoseira tamariscifolia (Hudson) Papenfuss
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
July 2012
Cystoseira usneoides (Linnaeus) M. Roberts
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
August 2011
Fucus guiryi G. I. Zardi, K. R. Nicastro, E. S. Serrão & G. A. Pearson
Praia da Amorosa
N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"
December 2013
Rhodophyta
Phaeophyta
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 26 of 36
Table 1. Continue. Phylum Phaeophyta
Macroalgae species
Origin
Location
Date of collection
Fucus serratus Linnaeus
Praia da Amorosa
N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"
December 2013
Fucus spiralis Linnaeus
Praia da Amorosa
N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"
December 2013
Halopteris filicina (Grateloup) Kützing
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
July 2012
Laminaria ochroleuca Bachelot de la Pylaie
Praia da Amorosa
N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"
December 2013
Padina pavonica (Linnaeus) Thivy
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
July 2012
Pelvetia canaliculata (Linnaeus) Decaisne & Thuret
Praia do Norte
N 41°41’49.75, W 8°51’3.52"
December 2013
Saccharina latissima (Linnaeus) C. E. Lane, C. Mayes, Druehl & G. W.
IMTA
N 41°27’11.20, W 8°46’28.29"
December 2013
Saccorhiza polyschides (Lightfoot) Batters
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
September 2012
Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt
Praia da Amorosa
N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"
December 2013
Sargassum vulgare C. Agardh
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
August 2011
Stypocaulon scoparium (Linnaeus) Kützing
Praia do Quebrado
N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"
June 2010
Saunders
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 2. α-Linolenic Acid and Phytoprostanes Contents in the Analyzed Macroalgae Species. Phytoprostanes* α-Linolenic acid (g/kg dry algae) 0.96 (0.00)d,e
Compound 2 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.
Compound 3 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.
Compound 8 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.
Compound 10 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.
Total (ng/100g dry algae) -
B. bifurcata
3.57 (0.04)e,f
n.d.
n.d.
5.68 (1.09)d
n.d.
5.68 (1.09)
C. spongiosus
4.09 (2.77)i
75.25 (3.71)d,e
38.05 (6.57)d
10.53 (2.32)b,c
4.67 (1.17)a
128.49 (6.78)
C. tomentosum
3.77 (0.28)i
22.67 (3.38)e
32.49 (4.45)d
14.42 (2.10)a
6.36 (0.25)a
75.94 (9.22)
C. tamariscifolia
0.69 (0.01)b
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
-
C. usneoides
2.62 (0.05)f
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
-
F. guiryi
5.08 (0.06)b
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
-
F. serratus
4.23 (0.06)c,d
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
-
F. spiralis
3.98 (0.14)d,e
18.61 (3.04)e
17.27 (1.32)d
n.d.
n.d.
35.87 (2.18)
Gigartina sp.
1.66 (0.02)h
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
-
G. vermiculophylla
1.79 (0.03)h
54.46 (6.31)d,e
43.49 (2.14)d
n.d.
n.d.
97.96 (4.91)
H. filicina
3.43 (0.08)f
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
-
L. ochroleuca
3.90 (0.13)d,e
36.42 (6.23)d,e
21.07 (5.54)d
n.d.
n.d.
57.48 (11.69)
P. pavonica
5.03 (0.08)a
26.33 (4.15)d,e
28.91 (3.60)d
6.39 (0.52)d
n.d.
61.36 (7.03)
P. canaliculata
4.40 (0.10)c
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
-
P. cartilagineum
2.63 (0.01)g
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
-
S. latissima
2.01 (0.07)h
700.94 (53.14)a
667.62 (51.34)a
12.33 (0.55)a,b
n.d.
1,380.90 (103.83)
Species A. armata
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 28 of 36
Table 2. Continue. Phytoprostanes* α-Linolenic acid (g/kg dry algae) 1.10 (0.03)i
Compound 2 (ng/100g dry algae) 413.35 (50.88)b
Compound 3 (ng/100g dry algae) 305.97 (39.56)b
Compound 8 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.
Compound 10 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.
Total (ng/100g dry algae) 719.62 (24.22)
S. muticum
3.94 (0.22)d,e
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
-
S. vulgare
3.62 (0.12)e,f
99.94 (17.63)d
39.54 (9.62)d
4.00 (0.86)d
n.d.
143.48 (26.92)
S. coronopifolius
0.78 (0.01)i
38.10 (4.91)d,e
36.80 (2.44)d
n.d.
n.d.
74.90 (4.93)
S. scoparium
0.80 (0.01)i
334.28 (44.67)c
170.23 (15.97)c
7.43 (0.37)c,d
n.d.
511.94 (52.69)
U. lactuca
5.11 (0.01)b
74.95 (6.10)d,e
55.17 (4.04)d
n.d.
n.d.
130.13 (2.14)
Ulva sp.
3.49 (0.30)f
88.28 (23.82)d,e
64.98 (6.72)d
n.d.
n.d.
153.25 (25.44)
Species S. polyschides
* 9-F1t-phytoprostane (2), 9-epi-9-F1t-phytoprostane (3), 16-B1-phytoprostane (8) and L1-phytoprostane (10). Results are expressed as mean (standard deviation) of three determinations. Not detected (n.d.). Different superscript letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p