Nonenzymatic α-Linolenic Acid Derivatives from the Sea: Macroalgae

ENSCM, Faculty of Pharmacy, Montpellier, France. J. Agric. Food Chem. , 2015, 63 (28), pp 6466–6474. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01904. Publication ...
0 downloads 4 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF MISSISSIPPI

Article

Non-Enzymatic #-Linolenic Acid Derivatives from the Sea: Macroalgae as Novel Sources of Phytoprostanes Mariana Barbosa, Jacinta Collado-González, Paula B. Andrade, Federico Ferreres, Patrícia Valentão, Jean-Marie Galano, Thierry Durand, and Angel Gil-Izquierdo J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01904 • Publication Date (Web): 30 Jun 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 6, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Non-Enzymatic α-Linolenic Acid Derivatives from the Sea: Macroalgae as Novel

2

Sources of Phytoprostanes

3 4

Mariana Barbosa†, Jacinta Collado-González‡, Paula B. Andrade†, Federico Ferreres‡,

5

Patrícia Valentão†, Jean-Marie Galano§, Thierry Durand§, Ángel Gil-Izquierdo‡,*

6 7



REQUIMTE/LAQV, Laboratório de Farmacognosia, Departamento de Química,

8

Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, nº 228,

9

4050-313 Porto, Portugal

10



Research Group on Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Department of

11

Food Science and Technology, CEBAS (CSIC), P.O. Box 164, 30100 Campus

12

University Espinardo, Murcia, Spain

13

§

14

of Montpellier - ENSCM, Faculty of Pharmacy, Montpellier, France

Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (IBMM), UMR 5247 - CNRS – University

15 16

*Corresponding author:

17

Tel: +34 968396363; Fax: +34 968396213; E-mail: [email protected]

18 19

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 2 of 36

20

ABSTRACT

21

Phytoprostanes, autoxidation products of α-linolenic acid, have been studied in several

22

plant species, but information regarding the natural occurrence of this large family of

23

biologically active oxidized lipids in macroalgae is still scarce. In this work, free

24

phytoprostane composition

25

Chlorophyta, Phaeophyta and Rhodophyta was determined through a recently validated

26

UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS method. The phytoprostane profiles varied greatly among all

27

samples, being F1t-phytoprostanes and L1-phytoprostanes the predominant and the

28

minor classes, respectively. No correlation between the amounts of α-linolenic acid in

29

algae material and phytoprostane content was found. Therefore, we hypothesize that the

30

observed variability could be species-specific or result from interspecific interactions.

31

This study provides new insight about the occurrence of phytoprostanes in macroalgae

32

and opens doors for future exploitation of these marine photosynthetic organisms as

33

sources of potentially bioactive oxylipins, encouraging their incorporation in food

34

products, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical preparations for human health.

of twenty-four

macroalgae species

belonging

to

35 36

KEYWORDS: α-Linolenic acid, GC-MS, Macroalgae, Oxidized lipids, Phytoprostanes,

37

UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS.

38

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

39

INTRODUCTION

40

Membrane lipids are major targets of free radical attack. Phytoprostanes are the

41

resulting products of the autoxidation of α-linolenic acid (C18:3 ω3) (1, Figure 1), one

42

of the most abundant polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) in terrestrial higher plant

43

membranes.1

44

phytoprostanes) can be generated depending on the position where the hydrogen

45

abstraction occurs and the oxygen atoms are inserted in the PUFA backbone.2 G1-

46

phytoprostanes are then precursors of different classes of cyclic phytoprostanes, named

47

in analogy with the prostaglandin nomenclature system as A1, B1, D1, E1, F1, dJ1, and

48

L1-phytoprostanes, with the latter being the regioisomer of B1-phytoprostane.3,

49

large family of regio- and stereoisomeric prostaglandin-like compounds has been found

50

to occur constitutively in plants; however, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated

51

under the influence of both biotic and abiotic factors interfere with cellular redox

52

balance and lead to enhanced formation of phytoprostanes, inducing, for instance, the

53

biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, the expression of genes involved in

54

detoxification processes and the regulation of oxidative stress-related mitogen-activated

55

protein kinase (MAPK)-dependent signaling pathway.1,

56

can function not only as defense signals, but also as endogenous mediators capable of

57

preventing cellular damage.5

58

Previous works have already reported the presence of different classes of

59

phytoprostanes in vegetable oils, particularly in linseed and soybean oils, as well as in

60

aqueous pollen extracts.8, 9 Nevertheless, information regarding the natural occurrence

61

of this novel family of biologically active oxidized lipids in macroalgae is still scarce.

62

As far as we know, only Ritter et al.10 have recently described the accumulation of

63

cyclic C18 A1-phytoprostanes in the brown macroalgae Ectocarpus siliculosus

Two

regioisomeric

series

(16-G1-phytoprostanes

5-7

and

9-G1-

4

This

Therefore, these oxylipins

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 4 of 36

64

(Dillwyn) Lyngbye to which copper stress was induced, supporting the occurrence of

65

ROS-mediated lipid peroxidation processes.10

66

Macroalgae, commonly known as seaweeds, are an abundant and heterogeneous group

67

of marine photosynthetic organisms widely used as food in direct human consumption.

68

Besides their key-role in the food sector, macroalgae are also employed in other

69

industrial branches, such as textiles, paints, cosmetics, and more recently as renewable,

70

sustainable and eco-friendly alternative sources for bioethanol production.11

71

Regardless of the large algal biodiversity that remains unexplored, macroalgae have

72

historically been an important group of organisms for marine drug development.12 In

73

fact, researchers have shown that macroalgae are rich sources of nutraceuticals with

74

numerous and remarkable biological activities.13

75

Macroalgae are usually grouped into Chlorophyta (green algae), Phaeophyta (brown

76

algae) and Rhodophyta (red algae), according to the presence of specific pigments.

77

These marine organisms are rich sources of bioactive compounds from both primary

78

and secondary metabolism, among which fatty acids are highlighted.14,

79

marine algae present low lipid content (1-5% of dry matter), PUFA account for almost

80

half of the lipid fraction.15 Several studies have shown that despite PUFA profiles are

81

highly variable between and within algal groups, linoleic (C18:2 ω6), linolenic (C18:3

82

ω3), arachidonic (C20:4 ω6), eicosapentaenoic (C20:5 ω3) and docosahexaenoic (C22:6

83

ω3) acids are predominant in macroalgae.16-20

84

Marine ecosystem is characterized by broad fluctuations of environmental conditions

85

that can be strong stress inducers in macroalgae populations, including extreme

86

temperatures, rapid salinity and nutrient changes, dessication, intense sunlight, among

87

others.21

15

Although

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

88

Taken together, these observations suggest that macroalgae can be valuable sources of

89

phytoprostanes and potentially used as biomarkers of oxidative stress and/or present

90

important biological effects.9, 22 Due to the fact that macroalgae are an integral part of

91

the Asian food and recently became a popular addition to some Western diets, our goal

92

was to assess the occurrence of free phytoprostanes, readily bioavailable and absorbed

93

by the human body, in twenty-four species of macroalgae belonging to Chlorophyta,

94

Phaeophyta and Rhodophyta. The reason for this characterization was based on the fact

95

that humans do not possess esterases in the gastrointestinal tract, rendering impossible

96

to absorb the esterified form of phytoprostanes.23

97

A fast, selective and robust ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to

98

triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) method, previously

99

validated by Collado-González et al.24, was employed. Moreover, all macroalgae

100

species selected for this work were characterized for their composition in α-linolenic

101

acid (1) by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) after alkaline hydrolysis

102

and derivatization.

103 104

MATERIALS AND METHODS

105

Standards and reagents. Ten phytoprostanes standards (9-F1t-phytoprostane

106

(2), 9-epi-9-F1t-phytoprostane (3), ent-16-F1t-phytoprostane (4), ent-16-epi-16-F1t-

107

phytoprostane (5), 9-D1t-phytoprostane (6), 9-epi-9-D1t-phytoprostane (7), 16-B1-

108

phytoprostane (8), ent-16-B1-phytoprostane (9), 9-L1-phytoprostane (10) and ent-9-L1-

109

phytoprostane (11)) (Figure 1) were synthesized according to our previous procedures.

110

25-27

111

The d4-15-F2t-isoprostane (8-isoPGF2α-d4) (containing four deuterium atoms at

positions 3,3ʹ,4, and 4ʹ) was purchased from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI, US).

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 6 of 36

112

Authentic standards of fatty acids methyl esters (FAME) for GC-MS analysis were

113

obtained from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, US).

114

Two types of solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges were used in this study:

115

Chromabond C18 columns (1000 mg/6 mL) were obtained from Macherey-Nagel

116

(Düren, Germany) and Strata X-AW (500 mg/3 mL) from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA,

117

US).

118

(hydroxymethyl)-methane (BIS-TRIS), chloroform, isooctane and boron trifluoride

119

(BF3) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, US). Methanol was acquired

120

from VWR (Fontenay-sous-Bois, France), acetonitrile was obtained from Merck

121

(Darmstadt, Germany) and n-hexane was purchased from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain).

122

All LC-MS grade solvents were obtained from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, US). Water

123

was treated in a Milli-Q water purification system from (Millipore, Bedford, MA, US).

Butylated

hydroxyanisole

(BHA),

bis-(2-hydroxyethyl)-amino-tris-

124 125

Macroalgae samples. Macroalgae samples consisted of three Chlorophyta, five

126

Rhodophyta and sixteen Phaeophyta species collected between 2010 and 2013 (Table

127

1). With the exceptions of G. vermiculophylla, S. latissima and Ulva sp., which were

128

cultivated in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) systems and provided by

129

CIIMAR/CIMAR – Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, all samples were

130

randomly collected during low tide periods from different places of the west coast of

131

Portugal, each sample corresponding to a mixture of three to four individuals in the

132

same stage of development. In order to prevent sample alterations, after collection they

133

were immediately placed on ice and transported to the laboratory in insulated, sealed ice

134

boxes, to protect them from heat, air, and light exposure. Macroalgae were then

135

carefully and quickly washed with NaCl aqueous solution (3.5%) to remove epiphytes

136

and encrusting material, at room temperature, without exposure to direct light, and kept

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

137

at –20 ºC, prior to lyophilization. The dried material was powdered (< 910 μm) and kept

138

in the dark, in a desiccator, until it was subjected to extraction. No alteration (color,

139

smell, humidity) of the samples was noticed during storage.

140 141

α-Linolenic acid and extract derivatization for GC-MS analysis. The

142

extraction of α-linolenic acid was performed as previously described, with slight

143

modifications.28 Briefly, 0.25 g of the dried macroalgae were extracted with 25 mL of

144

chloroform:methanol (2:1), under magnetic stirring at 500 rpm, for 10 min, at 40 °C.

145

The extraction procedure was repeated five times and the resulting extracts were pooled

146

and concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure (40 °C). The residue was then

147

hydrolyzed with 1 mL of KOH methanolic solution (11 g/L), at 90 °C, for 10 min. The

148

free fatty acids originally present and those resulting from the alkaline hydrolysis were

149

derivatized to their methyl esters with 1 mL of BF3 methanolic solution (10%), at 90 °C,

150

for 10 min. FAME were purified with 2×10 mL of isooctane and anhydrous sodium

151

sulphate was added to assure the total absence of water. The resulting extract was

152

evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen and dissolved in 200 μL of isooctane.

153

Each macroalgae species was assayed in triplicate.

154 155

GC-MS analysis of α-linolenic acid. GC-MS analysis was performed following

156

a previously established method.28 Derivatized extracts (1 μL) were analyzed using a

157

Varian CP-3800 gas chromatograph (Walnut Creek, CA, US) equipped with a Varian

158

Saturn 4000 mass selective detector (Walnut Creek, CA, US) and a Saturn GC/MS

159

workstation software version 6.8. The column used was a 30 x 0.25 mm, i.d., 0.25 µm,

160

VF-5 ms (Varian, Walnut Creek, CA, US). The injector port was heated to 250 °C.

161

Injections were performed in split mode, with a ratio of 1/40. The carrier gas was

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 8 of 36

162

Helium C-60 (Gasin, Portugal), at a constant flow of 1 mL/min. The oven temperature

163

was set at 40 °C for 1 min, then increased 5 °C/min to 250 °C, 3 °C/min to 300 °C and

164

held for 15 min. All mass spectra were acquired in EI mode. Ionization was maintained

165

off during the first 4 min, to avoid solvent overloading. The Ion Trap detector was set as

166

follows: transfer line, manifold and trap temperatures were respectively 280, 50 and 180

167

°C. The mass ranged from m/z 50 to 600, with a scan rate of 6 scan/s. The emission

168

current was 50 μA, and the electron multiplier was set in relative mode to auto tune

169

procedure. The maximum ionization time was 25,000 μs, with an ionization storage

170

level of m/z 35. The analysis was performed in Full Scan mode. Identification of α-

171

linolenic acid was achieved by comparison of its retention index and mass spectra with

172

those from pure standard injected under the same conditions, and from NIST 05 MS

173

Library Database. The amount of methyl ester of α-linolenic acid present in the samples

174

was achieved from the calibration curve of the respective standard prepared in

175

isooctane.

176 177

Phytoprostane extraction. Each pulverized macroalgae sample (1 g) was

178

crushed in a mortar and pestle with 5 mL methanol (0.1% BHA). The sample extracts

179

were centrifuged at 2,000 g during 10 min and the supernatants underwent SPE using a

180

Chromabond C18 column. Briefly, 10 mL of n-hexane were added to 1 mL of the

181

filtered sample and then rediluted in 2 mL of methanol and 2 mL of BIS-TRIS buffer.24

182

The emulsion of each macroalgae sample was applied to a previously conditioned and

183

equilibrated Strata-X-AW cartridge. After loading the column with the emulsion, 2 mL

184

of n-hexane, followed by 2 mL of Milli-Q water, 2 mL of methanol:Milli-Q water (1:3)

185

and 2 mL of acetonitrile were applied for removing undesired compounds. Target

186

compounds were eluted with 1 mL of methanol and dried under nitrogen stream. The

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

187

dried residue of each macroalgae sample was reconstituted with 200 µL of a mixture of

188

A/B solvents (90:10, v/v), solvent A being Milli-Q water/0.01% acetic acid and solvent

189

B methanol/0.01% acetic acid. Reconstituted extracts were sonicated, filtered through a

190

0.45 µm filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, US) and further injected and analyzed in an

191

UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS apparatus.

192 193

UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS analysis of free phytoprostanes. Separation of

194

phytoprostanes present in macroalgae samples was performed using an UHPLC coupled

195

to 6460 QqQ-MS/MS (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany), as previously

196

described.24 The column used was a 50 x 2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 µm, BEH C18 (Waters,

197

Milford, MA, US). The column temperature was 6 ºC. The mobile phases employed

198

were solvent A (Milli-Q water/acetic acid (99.99:0.01, v/v)) and solvent B

199

(methanol/acetic acid (99.99:0.01, v/v)). The elution was performed at a flow rate of 0.2

200

mL/min using the following gradient profile: 60% B at 0 min, 62% B at 2 min, 62.5% B

201

at 4 min, reaching 65% B at 8 min, and returning to the initial conditions at 8.01 min.

202

The MS analysis was applied in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) negative ESI

203

mode. ESI conditions and ion optics were as previously described.24 Data acquisition

204

and processing were performed using the MassHunter software version B.04.00

205

(Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The quantitation of phytoprostanes

206

detected in macroalgae was performed using authentic standards of compounds 2, 3, 8

207

and 10. The synthetic isoprostane d4-15-F2t-isoprostane (8-isoPGF2α-d4) was used as

208

internal standard.

209 210

Statistical Analysis. All the analytical determinations were performed in

211

triplicate and the mean values were reported. All values obtained were compared using

9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 10 of 36

212

analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey) and unpaired t-test. Pearson

213

correlations were calculated according to GraphPad Prism 6 Software, Inc. (San Diego,

214

CA, US). One-way ANOVA, unpaired t-test and principal component analysis (PCA)

215

were performed using IBM SPSS Statistic for windows Version 22.0 (Armonk, NY,

216

US). Differences at p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

217 218

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

219

The field of phytoprostanes was opened in 2,000, and currently is still in its infancy. As

220

far as we know, our work is the first report of different naturally occurring classes of

221

free phytoprostanes in twenty-four macroalgae species belonging to Chlorophyta,

222

Phaeophyta and Rhodophyta collected along the west coast of Portugal and from IMTA

223

systems. Likewise, this is the first time a correlation between α-linolenic acid levels and

224

its autoxidation products was ever tried in algae material.

225

Occurrence of α-linolenic acid in macroalgae. Although the fatty acid profiles

226

of some of the target species in this work have already been characterized, intra-specific

227

variability is common in macroalgae coming from different geographical locations

228

and/or exposure to diverse abiotic factors, resulting in different PUFA profiles.18 In this

229

work we were able to identify and quantitate α-linolenic acid (1) in the twenty-four

230

selected macroalgae species (Table 2). The content of this compound ranged between

231

ca. 0.7 and 5.6 g/kg of dry algae, C. tamariscifolia and U. lactuca presenting,

232

respectively, the lowest and the highest amounts. Indeed, previous studies have reported

233

that members of the order Ulvales presented compound 1 as the characteristic PUFA.17,

234

18

235

importance of assessing the occurrence of its autoxidation products, the phytoprostanes.

The presence of compound 1 in all the analyzed species enables and emphasizes the

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

236

Occurrence of free phytoprostanes in macroalgae. The analysis of

237

phytoprostanes in natural matrices is extremely challenging, requiring highly sensitive

238

and specific tools for their profiling and characterization.29 Moreover, the great diversity

239

granted by the presence of racemic mixtures of phytoprostanes increases the complexity

240

of these analyses. In this work, a fast, accurate and robust UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS

241

method previously developed by Collado-González et al.24 for quantitative and

242

qualitative determination of free phytoprostanes in foodstuffs was employed.

243

Among the ten available phytoprostane standards, only three were detected in the

244

analyzed macroalgae samples (Table 2). Neither 16-series of F1t-phytoprostanes nor 9-

245

series of D1t-phytoprostanes were detected in the studied species. Phytoprostane identity

246

was confirmed according to their molecular masses, the precursor ions (m/z 327.2 and

247

m/z 307.2), the characteristic MS/MS fragmentation product ions and the corresponding

248

retention times. The mass spectrometric information of the phytoprostanes detected in

249

one macroalgae sample (C. tomentosum) is summarized in Figure 2. Compounds 2 and

250

3 (Figure 2A) showed the same transition from the precursor ion at m/z [M-H]− 327.2 to

251

the product ion at m/z 171.2 (Figure 2B and 2C). Thus, their identification was only

252

possible by the comparison of their retention times: compound 2 eluted at 1.75 min,

253

while compound 3 eluted at 1.93 min (Figure 2A and 2B). Contrary to prostaglandins,

254

phytoprostanes are non-enzymatically formed as regio- and stereoisomeric mixtures.3

255

The analytical conditions employed in this study did not allow the enantiomers

256

separation. Therefore, compounds 8 and 10 (Figure 2A) were identified and quantitated

257

according to their specific transitions from the precursor ion m/z [M-H]− 307.2 to the

258

product ions m/z [M-H]– 235.2 and m/z [M-H]– 185.2, respectively (Figure 2D and 2E).

259

The qualitative profile of phytoprostanes found in the analyzed macroalgae samples

260

showed great variability among the three phyla (Chlorophyta, Phaeophyta and

11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 12 of 36

261

Rhodophyta) and even between species belonging to the same genus, i.e., compounds 2

262

and 3 were detected in F. spiralis, but in F. serratus and F. guiryi none of the studied

263

phytoprostanes was identified.

264

In the three studied green macroalgae (C. tomentosum, U. lactuca and Ulva sp.), as well

265

as in two of the red (S. coronopifolius and G. vermiculophylla) and in eight of the

266

brown species (C. spongiosus, F. spiralis, L. ochroleuca, P. pavonica, S. latissima, S.

267

polyschides, S. vulgare and S. scoparium), compounds 2 and 3 were identified. Also,

268

compound 8 was detected in four of the brown species (P. pavonica, S. latissima, S.

269

vulgare and S. scoparium). The brown macroalgae B. bifurcata contained only

270

compound 8. None of the screened phytoprostanes were detected in ten macroalgae

271

species (A. armata, C. tamariscifolia, C. usneoides, F. guiryi, F. serratus, Gigartina sp.,

272

H. filicina, P. canaliculata, P. cartilagineum and S. muticum). The species C.

273

spongiosus and C. tomentosum exhibited the higher diversity in phytoprostanes.

274

The determination of phytoprostane levels in macroalgae is of extreme importance,

275

stimulating the exploitation and characterization of new natural dietary sources of these

276

compounds.

277

The amount of phytoprostanes found in the analyzed samples is shown in Table 2. F1t-

278

phytoprostanes were the dominant class determined in this study, while L1-

279

phytoprostanes were only detected in two macroalgae species and at very low levels.

280

Concerning to each phytoprostane class, both compounds 2 and 3 were found in higher

281

concentration in the brown macroalgae S. latissima (ca. 701 and 668 ng/100 g of dry

282

algae, respectively); F. spiralis exhibited the lowest amount of these phytoprostanes (ca.

283

19 and 17 ng/100 g of dry algae, respectively). The sample with the lowest content of

284

compound 8 was S. vulgare (ca. 4 ng/100 g of dry algae), while C. tomentosum was

285

found to have the highest amount (ca. 14 ng/100 g of dry algae). C. spongiosus and C.

12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

286

tomentosum were the only samples that presented compound 10 (ca. 5 and 6 ng/100 g of

287

dry algae, respectively).

288

As observed with the qualitative profile, the quantitation of total phytoprostanes in the

289

studied macroalgae species revealed significant variability. The total phytoprostanes

290

content ranged between ca. 6 and 1,381 ng/100 g of dry algae. The macroalgae species

291

showing the highest amount of phytoprostanes (S. latissima) was from IMTA systems.

292

However, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the advantages of IMTA for obtaining

293

higher yields of phytoprostanes, as no marine counterpart of this species was analyzed.

294

To the best of our knowledge, no information has been published before on the content

295

of naturally occurring free phytoprostanes in macroalgae. Therefore, the results obtained

296

can only be compared with those of previous work performed on plant material and

297

other foodstuffs. Karg et al.9 found that either D1 or F1t-phytoprostanes were the

298

dominant classes in vegetable oils, while B1 and L1-phytoprostanes, including their

299

enantiomers, were the minor components.9 More recently, Collado-González et al.24

300

reported that F1t-phytoprostanes were the main class in the green table olive

301

“Manzanilla de Sevilla”.24 Likewise, in macroalgae, F1t-phytoprostanes were the main

302

phytoprostanes detected. This class of compounds was also found to occur in leaves,

303

flowers and roots of taxonomically distinct plant species, ranging from 43 to 1,380 ng/g

304

of dry weight.30 Although we are aware structural differentiation in macroalgae is likely

305

to be accompanied by variation in chemical composition, the present work used full

306

algae individuals in the same stage of development, rendering impossible to conclude

307

about the presence and distribution of phytoprostanes in different morphological parts

308

of the selected species.

309

Although it was theoretically expected to find both 9- and 16-series of F1-

310

phytoprostanes in equal amounts, we were not able to assure this hypothetical relation

13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 14 of 36

311

in the studied macroalgae. In fact, previous studies only reported that 9- and 16-series

312

(previously referred as types II and I, respectively) of A1, B1 and E1-phytoprostanes

313

were of equal abundance in different plant tissues.9 Moreover, Imbusch et al.

314

that due to the isomeric complexity of F1-phytoprostanes, identification and

315

quantification of this class of compounds is technically difficult. Therefore, studies

316

reporting the presence of F1-phytoprostanes focused essentially on the differentiation

317

between free and esterified isomers.9, 30-32 The analytical methodology employed in this

318

work was able to differentiate 9-F1-phytoprostane and 16-F1-phytoprostane.24 Likewise,

319

the occurrence of these regioisomers was not of equal proportions: in refined sunflower

320

oil the 9-F1-phytoprostane was found in 44.48 ng/mL while the 16-F1-phytoprostane

321

was found in 24.40 ng/mL of; in 0.8º and 0.4º extra virgin oil 9-F1-phytoprostane were

322

not detected whereas 16-F1-phytoprostane was found in 2.13 ng/mL and 3.70 ng/mL,

323

respectively.24 The reason for these differences is still unclear and more studies are

324

needed to clarify the underlying response mechanisms of individual free phytoprostanes

325

in natural products.

31

stated

326 327

Statistical analysis. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to

328

determine possible distribution patterns of the identified and quantitated phytoprostanes

329

(2, 3, 8 and 10) in all of the analyzed macroalgae samples. PCA of normalized

330

phytoprostane dataset explained 92.9% of total variations, PC1 accounting for 64.0% of

331

the variance and PC2 for 28.9%. Five groups were distinguished (Figure 3A). One

332

group (G1) includes C. spongiosus and C. tomentosum, the only two macroalgae species

333

in which compound 10 was identified. G2 contains G. vermiculophylla, S.

334

coronopifolius, U. lactuca and Ulva sp., which presented similar amounts of both

335

compounds 2 and 3, while G3 comprises the three macroalgae species that clearly stood

14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

336

out for their high levels in these exact phytoprostanes (S. latissima, S. scoparium and S.

337

polyschides). The low amounts of compounds 2 and 3 in F. spiralis and L. ochroleuca

338

led to the inclusion of these two species in another group (G4), together with A. armata,

339

C. tamariscifolia, C. usneoides, F. guiryi, F. serratus, Gigartina sp., H. filicina, P.

340

canaliculata, P. cartilagineum and S. muticum, in which none of the available

341

phytoprostanes was identified. Finally, B. bifurcata, P. pavonica and S. vulgare were

342

grouped together (G5) due to their similar amounts of compound 8 (Figure 3). The total

343

amount of phytoprostanes is visibly influenced by the levels of both compounds 2 and

344

3, confirming that F1t-phytoprostane is the dominant phytoprostane class in the analyzed

345

samples (Figure 3B).

346

Pearson correlations were calculated in order to establish a potential relationship

347

between the presence of α-linolenic acid (1) in algae material and phytoprostane

348

composition. Our results showed a lack of correlation between the amount of compound

349

1 and total phytoprostane content (r=-0.318). However, the possibility of enzymatic

350

oxidation of compound 1 cannot be ignored. Although this compound is prone to

351

undergo autoxidation reactions, it can also be released from membrane lipids and

352

metabolized by the enzymatic action of lipoxygenases (LOX).33 In fact, several studies

353

have already reported the presence of diverse structurally unique oxylipins from

354

enzymatic routes in macroalgae.34-39 Also recently, Barden et al.40 conducted a clinical

355

trial with healthy volunteers whose diet was supplemented with linseed oil. They

356

detected high levels of phytoprostanes, but they were not able to assess whether

357

phytoprostanes increased due to enhanced concentration of compound 1 or by direct

358

intake from linseed oil.40

359

Altogether, these observations suggest that the large variations observed in

360

phytoprostane composition can be partially explained by intrinsic factors (e.g.,

15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 16 of 36

361

physiological variations within algae organs) and/or extrinsic factors (e.g., geographical

362

origin or area of cultivation, seasonal and environmental variations, time of harvest,

363

water temperature, salinity levels, and processing methods).

364 365

At present, the interest in phytoprostanes comprises two general areas: as biomarkers of

366

oxidative stress in plant-derived foodstuffs and as bioactive mediators with potential

367

benefits in human health. As example, Collado-González et al.41 have recently reported

368

that some phytoprostanes could be considered as early candidate biomarkers of water

369

stress in olive tree.41 Concerning to their biological potential, studies have been shown

370

that certain phytoprostane classes were active in various experimental models. 9, 22, 42, 43

371

However, further studies are required using different natural dietary sources of

372

phytoprostanes to evaluate the real effect of these oxidized lipids on human health.

373

In this regard, our study represents a first approach in the assessment of different

374

naturally occurring classes of free phytoprostanes in macroalgae. The rational

375

exploitation of photosynthetic marine organisms as valuable sources of prominent

376

oxidized lipids is encouraged for future application as substitutes of chemically

377

synthesized oxylipins and as pharmaceuticals and/or nutraceuticals, providing a

378

complementary treatment for chronic diseases, including neurodegenerative and

379

inflammation-related pathologies.

380 381

ABBREVIATIONS USED

382

BHA,

383

(hydroxymethyl)-methane); IMTA, integrated multi-trophic aquaculture; MAPK,

384

mitogen-activated protein kinase; MRM, multiple reaction monitoring; PCA, principal

385

component analysis; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SPE, solid-phase extraction;

butylated

hydroxyanisole;

BIS-TRIS,

bis-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-amino-tris-

16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

386

UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS,

387

quadrupole-mass spectrometry.

ultra-high

performance

liquid

chromatography-triple-

388 389

FUNDING

390

This work received financial support from the European Union (FEDER funds through

391

COMPETE) and National Funds (FCT, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) through

392

project UID/QUI/50006/2013. The work also received financial support from CYTED

393

Programme (Ref. 112RT0460) CORNUCOPIA Thematic Network and projects

394

AGL2011-23690, AGL2013-45922-C2-1-R and AGL2013-45922-C2-2-R (CICYT). To

395

all financing sources the authors are greatly indebted. M. Barbosa and J. Collado-

396

Gonzalez are indebted to FCT and MINECO (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad

397

Español) for their grants, SFRH/BD/95861/2013 and BES-2011-048401, respectively.

398

17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

399

REFERENCES

400

1.

401 402

Page 18 of 36

Mueller, M. J. Archetype signals in plants: the phytoprostanes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 441-448.

2.

Durand, T.; Bultel-Poncé, V.; Guy, A.; Berger, S.; Mueller, M. J.; Galano, J.-M.

403

New bioactive oxylipins formed by non-enzymatic free-radical-catalyzed

404

pathways: the phytoprostanes. Lipids. 2009, 44, 875-888.

405

3.

Jahn, U.; Galano, J.-M.; Durand, T. A cautionary note on the correct structure

406

assignment of phytoprostanes and the emergence of a new prostane ring system.

407

Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes Essent. Fatty Acids. 2010, 82, 83-86.

408

4.

Porta, A.; Chiesa, F.; Quaroni, M.; Persico, M.; Moratti, R.; Zanoni, G.; Vidari,

409

G. A divergent enantioselective synthesis of 9-J1-phytoprostane and 9-A1-

410

phytoprostane methyl ester. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 2111-2119.

411

5.

Loeffler, C.; Berger, S.; Guy, A.; Durand, T.; Bringmann, G.; Dreyer, M.; von

412

Rad, U.; Durner, J.; Mueller, M. B1-phytoprostanes trigger plant defense and

413

detoxification responses. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 328-340.

414

6.

415 416

Savchenko, T.; Zastrijnaja, O.; Klimov, V. Oxylipins and plant abiotic stress resistance. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2014, 79, 362-375.

7.

Thoma, I.; Loeffler, C.; Sinha, A.; Gupta, M.; Krischke, M.; Steffan, B.; Roitsch,

417

T.; Mueller M. Cyclopentenone isoprostanes induced by reactive oxygen species

418

trigger defense gene activation and phytoalexin accumulation in plants. Plant J.

419

2003, 34, 363-375.

420

8.

Traidl-Hoffmann, C.; Mariani, V.; Hochrein, H.; Karg, K.; Wagner, H.; Ring, J.;

421

Mueller, M. J.; Jakob, T.; Behrendt, H. Pollen-associated phytoprostanes inhibit

422

dendritic cell interleukin-l2 production and augment T helper type 2 cell

423

polarization. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 627-636. 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 36

424

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

9.

Karg, K.; Dirsch, V.; Vollmar, A. M.; Cracowski, J.-L.; Laporte, F.; Mueller, M.

425

J. Biologically active oxidized lipids (phytoprostanes) in the plant diet and

426

parenteral lipid nutrition. Free Radical Res. 2007, 41, 25-37.

427

10.

Ritter, A.; Dittami, S. M.; Goulitquer, S.; Correa, J. A.; Boyen, C.; Potin, P.;

428

Tonon, T. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of copper stress acclimation

429

in Ectocarpus siliculosus highlights signaling and tolerance mechanisms in

430

brown algae. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 1-17.

431

11.

John, R. P.; Anisha, G. S.; Nampoothiri, K. M.; Pandey, A. Micro and

432

macroalgal biomass: a renewable source for bioethanol. Bioresour. Technol.

433

2011, 102, 186-193.

434

12.

Leal, M. C.; Munro, M. H.; Blunt, J. W.; Puga, J.; Jesus, B.; Calado, R.; Rosa,

435

R.; Madeira, C. Biogeography and biodiscovery hotspots of macroalgal marine

436

natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013, 30, 1380-1390.

437

13.

review. J. Appl. Phycol. 2004, 16, 245−262.

438 439

Smit, A. J. Medicinal and pharmaceutical uses of seaweed natural products: a

14.

Kadam, S. U.; Tiwari, B. K.; O’Donnell, C. P. Application of novel extraction

440

technologies for bioactives from marine algae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61,

441

4667-4675.

442

15.

Lordan, S.; Ross, R. P.; Stanton, C. Marine bioactives as functional food

443

ingredients: potential to reduce the incidence of chronic diseases. Mar. Drugs.

444

2011, 9, 1056-1100.

445

16.

Andrade, P. B.; Barbosa, M.; Matos, R. P.; Lopes, G.; Vinholes, J.; Mouga, T.;

446

Valentão, P. Valuable compounds in macroalgae extracts. Food Chem. 2013,

447

138, 1819-1828.

19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

448

17.

Page 20 of 36

Kumari, P.; Bijo, A.; Mantri, V. A.; Reddy, C.; Jha, B. Fatty acid profiling of

449

tropical marine macroalgae: an analysis from chemotaxonomic and nutritional

450

perspectives. Phytochemistry. 2013, 86, 44-56.

451

18.

Pereira, H.; Barreira, L.; Figueiredo, F.; Custódio, L.; Vizetto-Duarte, C.; Polo,

452

C.; Rešek, E.; Engelen, A.; Varela, J. Polyunsaturated fatty acids of marine

453

macroalgae: potential for nutritional and pharmaceutical applications. Mar.

454

Drugs. 2012, 10, 1920-1935.

455

19.

Schmid, M.; Guihéneuf, F.; Stengel, D. B. Fatty acid contents and profiles of 16

456

macroalgae collected from the Irish Coast at two seasons. J. Appl. Phycol. 2014,

457

26, 451-463.

458

20.

van Ginneken, V. J.; Helsper, J.; de Visser, W.; van Keulen, H.; Brandenburg,

459

W. A. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in various macroalgal species from north

460

Atlantic and tropical seas. Lipids Health Dis. 2011, 10, 104.

461

21.

Sudatti, D. B.; Fujii, M. T.; Rodrigues, S. V.; Turra, A.; Pereira, R. C. Effects of

462

abiotic factors on growth and chemical defenses in cultivated clones of

463

Laurencia dendroidea J. Agardh (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Mar. Biol.

464

(Heidelberg, Ger.). 2011, 158, 1439-1446.

465

22.

Minghetti, L.; Salvi, R.; Lavinia Salvatori, M.; Ajmone-Cat, M. A.; De Nuccio,

466

C.; Visentin, S.; Bultel-Poncé, V.; Oger, C.; Guy, A.; Galano, J.-M.; Greco, A.;

467

Bernardo, A.; Durand, T. Nonenzymatic oxygenated metabolites of α-linolenic

468

acid B1- and L1-phytoprostanes protect immature neurons from oxidant injury

469

and promote differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitors through PPAR-γ

470

activation. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2014, 73, 41-50.

20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 36

471

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

23.

Lafay, S.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Manach, C.; Morand, C.; Besson, C.; Scalbert, A.

472

Chlorogenic acid is absorbed in its intact form in the stomach of rats. J. Nutr.

473

2006, 136, 1192-1197.

474

24.

Collado-González, J.; Medina, S.; Durand, T.; Guy, A.; Galano, J.-M.;

475

Torrecillas, A.; Ferreres, F.; Gil-Izquierdo, A. New UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS

476

method for quantitative and qualitative determination of free phytoprostanes in

477

foodstuffs of commercial olive and sunflower oils. Food Chem. 2015, 178, 212-

478

220.

479

25.

480 481

El Fangour, S.; Guy, A.; Vidal, J.-P.; Rossi, J.-C.; Durand, T. Total synthesis of phytoprostane F1 and its 16 epimer. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2105-2108.

26.

El Fangour, S.; Guy, A.; Despres, V.; Vidal, J.-P.; Rossi, J.-C.; Durand, T. Total

482

syntheses of the eight diastereoisomers of the syn-anti-syn phytoprostanes F1

483

types I and II. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2498-2503.

484

27.

Pinot, E.; Guy, A.; Fournial, A.; Balas, L.; Rossi, J.-C.; Durand, T. Total

485

synthesis

486

phytoprostanes E1 type II and of the 15-E2t-isoprostanes. J. Org. Chem. 2008,

487

73, 3063-3069.

488

28.

of

the

four

enantiomerically

pure

diasteroisomers

of

the

Ribeiro, B.; de Pinho, P. G.; Andrade, P. B.; Baptista, P.; Valentão, P. Fatty acid

489

composition of wild edible mushrooms species: a comparative study. Microchem

490

J. 2009, 93, 29–35.

491

29.

492 493

Thoma, I.; Krischke, M.; Loeffler, C.; Mueller, M. The isoprostanoid pathway in plants. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 2004, 128, 135-148.

30.

Imbusch, R.; Mueller, M. J. Formation of isoprostane F(2)-like compounds

494

(phytoprostanes F(1)) from alpha-linolenic acid in plants. Free Radical Biol.

495

Med. 2000, 28, 720-726.

21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

496

31.

Page 22 of 36

Imbusch, R.; Mueller, M. J. Analysis of oxidative stress and wound-inducible

497

dinor isoprostanes F1 (phytoprostanes F1) in plants. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124,

498

1293-1303.

499

32.

Sattler, S. E.; Mène-Saffrané, L.; Farmer, E. E.; Krischke, M.; Mueller, M. J.;

500

DellaPenna, D. Nonenzymatic lipid peroxidation reprograms gene expression

501

and activates defense markers in Arabidopsis tocopherol-deficient mutants.

502

Plant Cell. 2006, 18, 3706-3720.

503

33.

504 505

Kumari, P.; Reddy, R.; Jha, B. Quantification of selected endogenous hydroxyoxylipins from tropical marine macroalgae. Mar. Biotechnol. 2014, 16, 74-87.

34.

Gerwick, W. H.; Proteau, P. J.; Nagle, D. G.; Wise, M. L.; Jiang, Z. D.; Bernart,

506

M. W.; Hamberg, M. Biologically active oxylipins from seaweeds.

507

Hydrobiologia. 1993, 260, 653-665.

508

35.

509 510

Proteau, P. J.; Gerwick, W. H. Divinyl ethers and hydroxy fatty acids from three species of Laminaria (brown algae). Lipids. 1993, 28, 783-787.

36.

Todd, J. S.; Proteau, P. J.; Gerwick, W. H. The absolute configuration of

511

ecklonialactones A, B, and E, novel oxylipins from brown algae of the genera

512

Ecklonia and Egregia. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 171-174.

513

37.

Jiang, Z.-D.; Gerwick, W. H. Novel oxylipins from the temperate red alga

514

Polyneura latissima: evidence for an arachidonate 9 (S)-lipoxygenase. Lipids.

515

1997, 32, 231-235.

516

38.

Kousaka, K.; Ogi, N.; Akazawa, Y.; Fujieda, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Takada, Y.;

517

Kimura, J. Novel oxylipin metabolites from the brown alga Eisenia bicyclis. J.

518

Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1318-1323.

22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 36

519

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

39.

Choi, H.; Proteau, P. J.; Byrum, T.; Gerwick, W. H. Cymatherelactone and

520

cymatherols A− C, polycyclic oxylipins from the marine brown alga Cymathere

521

triplicata. Phytochemistry. 2012, 73, 134-141.

522

40.

Barden, A. E.; Croft, K. D.; Durand, T.; Guy, A.; Mueller, M. J.; Mori, T. A.

523

Flaxseed oil supplementation increases plasma F1-phytoprostanes in healthy

524

men. J. nutr. 2009, 139, 1890-1895.

525

41.

Collado-González, J.; Pérez-López, D.; Memmi, H.; Gijón, M. C.; Medina, S.;

526

Durand, T.; Guy, A.; Galano, J.-M.; Ferreres, F.; Torrecillas, A.; Gil-Izquierdo,

527

A. Water deficit during pit hardening enhances phytoprostanes content, a plant

528

biomarker of oxidative stress, in extra virgin olive oil. J Agric Food Chem. 2015,

529

63, 3784-3792.

530

42.

Gutermuth, J.; Bewersdorff, M.; Traidl-Hoffmann, C.; Ring, J.; Mueller, M. J.;

531

Behrendt, H.; Jakob, T. Immunomodulatory effects of aqueous birch pollen

532

extracts and phytoprostanes on primary immune responses in vivo. J. Allergy

533

Clin. Immunol. 2007, 120, 293-299.

534

43.

Barden, A.; Mas, E.; Henry, P.; Durand, T.; Galano, J.-M.; Roberts, L. J.; Croft,

535

K. D.; Mori, T. A. The effects of oxidation products of arachidonic acid and n3

536

fatty acids on vascular and platelet function. Free Radical Res. 2011, 45, 469-

537

476.

538

23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 24 of 36

539

FIGURE CAPTIONS

540

Figure 1. Chemical structures of α-linolenic acid (1) and of the studied phytoprostanes:

541

9-F1t-phytoprostane (2), 9-epi-9-F1t-phytoprostane (3), ent-16-F1t-phytoprostane (4),

542

ent-16-epi-16-F1t-phytoprostane (5), 9-D1t-phytoprostane (6), 9-epi-9-D1t-phytoprostane

543

(7), 16-B1-phytoprostane (8), ent-16-B1-phytoprostane (9), 9-L1-phytoprostane (10) and

544

ent-9-L1-phytoprostane (11).

545 546

Figure 2. (A) Representative UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS chromatogram of detected

547

phytoprostanes (C. tomentosum) and MRM transitions for quantitation of (B) 9-F1t-

548

phytoprostane (2), (C) 9-epi-9-F1t-phytoprostane (3), (D) 16-B1-phytoprostane (8) and

549

(E) 9-L1-phytoprostane (10).

550 551

Figure 3. Projection of macroalgae (A) (variables: A. armata (AA), B. bifurcata (BB),

552

C. spongiosus (CS), C. tomentosum (Ctom), C. tamariscifolia (CT), C. usneoides (CU),

553

F. guiryi (FG), F. serratus (Fser), F. spiralis (Fspi), Gigartina sp. (Gsp), G.

554

vermiculophylla (GV), H. filicina (HL), L. ochroleuca (LO), P. pavonica (PP), P.

555

canaliculata (PC), P. cartilagineum (Pcart), S. latissima (SL), S. polyschides (SP), S.

556

muticum (SM), S. vulgare (SV), S. coronopfolius (SC), S. scoparium (SS), U. lactuca

557

(UL) and Ulva sp. (Usp) and loadings (B) by phytoprostane composition (variables: 2,

558

3, 8 and 10) into the plane composed by the principal components PC1 and PC2

559

containing 92.9% of the total variance.

24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 25 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Table 1. Characterization of Macroalgae Samples. Phylum Chlorophyta

Species

Origin

Location

Date of collection

Codium tomentosum Stackhouse

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

April 2011

Ulva lactuca Linnaeus

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

August 2011

Ulva sp.

IMTA

N 41°27’11.20, W 8°46’28.29"

July 2012

Asparagopsis armata Harvey

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

June 2010

Gigartina sp.

Praia da Amorosa

N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"

December 2013

Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Ohmi) Papenfuss

IMTA

N 41°27’11.20, W 8°46’28.29"

July 2012

Plocamium cartilagineum (Linnaeus) P. S. Dixo

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

July 2012

Sphaerococcus coronopifolius Stackhouse

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

June 2010

Bifurcaria bifurcata R. Ross

Praia da Amorosa

N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"

December 2013

Cladostephus spongiosus (Hudson) C. Agardh

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

June 2010

Cystoseira tamariscifolia (Hudson) Papenfuss

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

July 2012

Cystoseira usneoides (Linnaeus) M. Roberts

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

August 2011

Fucus guiryi G. I. Zardi, K. R. Nicastro, E. S. Serrão & G. A. Pearson

Praia da Amorosa

N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"

December 2013

Rhodophyta

Phaeophyta

25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 26 of 36

Table 1. Continue. Phylum Phaeophyta

Macroalgae species

Origin

Location

Date of collection

Fucus serratus Linnaeus

Praia da Amorosa

N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"

December 2013

Fucus spiralis Linnaeus

Praia da Amorosa

N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"

December 2013

Halopteris filicina (Grateloup) Kützing

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

July 2012

Laminaria ochroleuca Bachelot de la Pylaie

Praia da Amorosa

N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"

December 2013

Padina pavonica (Linnaeus) Thivy

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

July 2012

Pelvetia canaliculata (Linnaeus) Decaisne & Thuret

Praia do Norte

N 41°41’49.75, W 8°51’3.52"

December 2013

Saccharina latissima (Linnaeus) C. E. Lane, C. Mayes, Druehl & G. W.

IMTA

N 41°27’11.20, W 8°46’28.29"

December 2013

Saccorhiza polyschides (Lightfoot) Batters

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

September 2012

Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt

Praia da Amorosa

N 41°38’51.44, W 8°49’32.53"

December 2013

Sargassum vulgare C. Agardh

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

August 2011

Stypocaulon scoparium (Linnaeus) Kützing

Praia do Quebrado

N 39°22’0.91, W 9°22’25.86"

June 2010

Saunders

26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 36

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Table 2. α-Linolenic Acid and Phytoprostanes Contents in the Analyzed Macroalgae Species. Phytoprostanes* α-Linolenic acid (g/kg dry algae) 0.96 (0.00)d,e

Compound 2 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.

Compound 3 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.

Compound 8 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.

Compound 10 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.

Total (ng/100g dry algae) -

B. bifurcata

3.57 (0.04)e,f

n.d.

n.d.

5.68 (1.09)d

n.d.

5.68 (1.09)

C. spongiosus

4.09 (2.77)i

75.25 (3.71)d,e

38.05 (6.57)d

10.53 (2.32)b,c

4.67 (1.17)a

128.49 (6.78)

C. tomentosum

3.77 (0.28)i

22.67 (3.38)e

32.49 (4.45)d

14.42 (2.10)a

6.36 (0.25)a

75.94 (9.22)

C. tamariscifolia

0.69 (0.01)b

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

-

C. usneoides

2.62 (0.05)f

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

-

F. guiryi

5.08 (0.06)b

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

-

F. serratus

4.23 (0.06)c,d

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

-

F. spiralis

3.98 (0.14)d,e

18.61 (3.04)e

17.27 (1.32)d

n.d.

n.d.

35.87 (2.18)

Gigartina sp.

1.66 (0.02)h

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

-

G. vermiculophylla

1.79 (0.03)h

54.46 (6.31)d,e

43.49 (2.14)d

n.d.

n.d.

97.96 (4.91)

H. filicina

3.43 (0.08)f

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

-

L. ochroleuca

3.90 (0.13)d,e

36.42 (6.23)d,e

21.07 (5.54)d

n.d.

n.d.

57.48 (11.69)

P. pavonica

5.03 (0.08)a

26.33 (4.15)d,e

28.91 (3.60)d

6.39 (0.52)d

n.d.

61.36 (7.03)

P. canaliculata

4.40 (0.10)c

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

-

P. cartilagineum

2.63 (0.01)g

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

-

S. latissima

2.01 (0.07)h

700.94 (53.14)a

667.62 (51.34)a

12.33 (0.55)a,b

n.d.

1,380.90 (103.83)

Species A. armata

27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 28 of 36

Table 2. Continue. Phytoprostanes* α-Linolenic acid (g/kg dry algae) 1.10 (0.03)i

Compound 2 (ng/100g dry algae) 413.35 (50.88)b

Compound 3 (ng/100g dry algae) 305.97 (39.56)b

Compound 8 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.

Compound 10 (ng/100g dry algae) n.d.

Total (ng/100g dry algae) 719.62 (24.22)

S. muticum

3.94 (0.22)d,e

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

-

S. vulgare

3.62 (0.12)e,f

99.94 (17.63)d

39.54 (9.62)d

4.00 (0.86)d

n.d.

143.48 (26.92)

S. coronopifolius

0.78 (0.01)i

38.10 (4.91)d,e

36.80 (2.44)d

n.d.

n.d.

74.90 (4.93)

S. scoparium

0.80 (0.01)i

334.28 (44.67)c

170.23 (15.97)c

7.43 (0.37)c,d

n.d.

511.94 (52.69)

U. lactuca

5.11 (0.01)b

74.95 (6.10)d,e

55.17 (4.04)d

n.d.

n.d.

130.13 (2.14)

Ulva sp.

3.49 (0.30)f

88.28 (23.82)d,e

64.98 (6.72)d

n.d.

n.d.

153.25 (25.44)

Species S. polyschides

* 9-F1t-phytoprostane (2), 9-epi-9-F1t-phytoprostane (3), 16-B1-phytoprostane (8) and L1-phytoprostane (10). Results are expressed as mean (standard deviation) of three determinations. Not detected (n.d.). Different superscript letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p