Olefination of α-Hydroxy or α-Aminoaldehyde Derivatives via Reaction

Jul 23, 2004 - A key step features an iridium-catalyzed asymmetric intermolecular cascade cyclization, constructing the lower N,N-aminal-containing CD...
0 downloads 0 Views 76KB Size
Olefination of r-Hydroxy or r-Aminoaldehyde Derivatives via Reaction of Their Arylsulfonylhydrazones with Sulfonyl Anions

SCHEME 1

Jerzy Wicha* and Andrzej Zarecki Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Kasprzaka 44, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland [email protected] Received January 15, 2004

Abstract: Reaction of tosylhydrazones of O-substituted R-hydroxy or N-substituted R-amino aldehydes (2, 7, 11, 15, 17, and 20) with selected R-magnesio alkyl phenyl sulfones afforded the respective derivatives of allylic alcohols or allylic amines. 2,3-O-Isopropylidene-D-glyceraldehyde (1) was transformed into its tosylhydrazone (2) and then olefins 4a with retention of optical purity.

Synthesis of olefins by coupling of aldehydes with alkanes bearing a carbanion-stabilizing group has a pivotal importance in organic chemistry.1 The classical Marc Julia olefination2 applying phenyl- (or tert-butyl) alkyl sulfones has found numerous applications in targetoriented synthesis.3 Several modifications of the original three-step procedure have been developed in order to improve its efficiency and stereoselectivity. The reductive elimination step requiring relatively harsh conditions has received a particular attention.4 Studies on the sulfonebased olefination reactions culminated in the discovery by S. A. Julia and co-workers5 of a new one-step olefination reaction. The “direct” olefination reaction applies heterocylic sulfones, such as benzothiazoyl, pyridyl, and phenyltetrazoyl sulfone. The latter introduced by Kocienski and co-workers6 offers high E-stereoselectivity. An indispensable feature of heterocyclic sulfones applied in the direct Julia olefination is the presence of a reactive electrophilic CdN bond. Although the Julia-Kocienski olefination reaction proved remarkably successful,7 it appears that in certain cases application of robust chemically stable phenyl sulfones may still be of advantage. (1) (a) Kelly, S. E. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 1, p 729. (b) Preparation of Alkenes: A Practical Approach; Williams, J. M. J., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1996. (2) (a) Julia, M.; Paris, J.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 4833-4836. (b) Kocienski, P. J.; Lythgoe, B.; Ruston, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1979, 1290-1293. (3) For selected reviews, see: Kocienski, P. Phosphorus Sulphur 1985, 24, 97-127. (b) Simpkins, N. S. Sulphones in Organic Chemistry; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1993. (4) (a) Kende, A. S.; Mendoza, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7105-7108. (b) Pouilly, P. d.; Chenede, A.; Mallet, J. M.; Sinay, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 8065-8068. (c) Satoh, T.; Hanaki, N.; Yamada, N.; Asano, T. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6223-6234. (d) Marko, I. E.; Murphy, F.; Kumps, L.; Ates, A.; Touillaux, R.; Craig, D.; Carballares, S.; Dolan, S. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2609-2619. (5) (a) Baudin, J. B.; Hareau, G.; Julia, S. A.; Ruel, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 1175-1178. (b) For a review, see: Blakemore, P. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 2563-2585. (6) Blakemore, P. R.; Cole, W. J.; Kocienski, P. J.; Morley, A. Synlett 1998, 26-28.

A potentially useful variation of olefination of aldehydes has been reported by Vedejs et al.8 some time ago. In this method an aldehyde i, X ) H (Scheme 1) was initially transformed into its tosylhydrazone ii, X ) H, and then treated with an excess of R-lithio sulfone. Exchange of an active proton for metal and addition of the nucleophile to the tosylhydrazone CdN bond afforded adduct iii, X ) H. Fragmentation of the intermediate iii via iv gave olefin v, X ) H. It is noteworthy that no reducing reagents are involved in the discussed reaction sequence. Some related coupling reactions involving aldehyde tosylhydrazones have also been noted.9 We have recently found10 that replacing R-lithium sulfones used in the Vedejs procedure by R-magnesium sulfones makes it possible to evade some side reactions (as the Shapiro fragmentation11) and to extend significantly the scope of application of this olefination reaction. It was thought of interest to determine whether the tosylhydrazone-mediated olefination may accommodate aldehydes bearing alkoxy or amino groups (i, X ) OAlkyl or N(Alk/Aryl) in the R-position. It could be reasoned that addition of a metalated sulfone (2 equiv) to ii will provide (7) Recent works include: (a) Takahashi, T.; Watanabe, H.; Kitahara, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 9219-9222. (b) Berberich, S. M.; Cherney, R. J.; Colucci, J.; Courillon, C.; Geraci, L. S.; Kirkland, T. A.; Marx, M. A.; Schneider, M. F.; Martin, S. F. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 6819-6832. (c) Kang, S. H.; Choi, H. W.; Kim, C. M.; Jun, H. S.; Kang, S. Y.; Jeong, J. W.; Youn, J. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 68176819. (d) Charette, A. B.; Berthelette, C.; St-Martin, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6619-6624. (e) Charette, A. B.; Berthelette, C.; St-Martin, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5149-5153; (8) Vedejs, E.; Dolphin, J. M.; Stolle, W. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 1, 249-251. (9) (a) Katritzky, A. R.; Tymoshenko, D. O.; Belyakov, S. A. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3332-3334. (b) Kabalka, G. W.; Wu, Z.; Ju, Y. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4759-4760. (10) Kurek-Tyrlik, A.; Marczak, S.; Michalak, K.; Wicha, J.; Zarecki, A. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6994-7001. (11) Shapiro, R. H. Org. React. (N.Y.) 1976, 23, 405. 10.1021/jo0499118 CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society

5810

J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5810-5812

Published on Web 07/23/2004

SCHEME 2

SCHEME 3

intermediate iii, which will fragment to respective derivatives of allylic alcohols or amines, v, X ) OAlkyl or N(Alk/Aryl). However, elimination of the X-group may occur as well, destroying the stereogenic center (if present) and affording undesired product vi. It was recently shown12,13 that tosylhydazones of some O-substituted R-hydroxy and N-substituted R-amino aldehydes in reaction with organolithium or Grignard reagents afford olefins viii, as illustrated in Scheme 1. In the present work we examine olefination of representative R-hydroxy and R-amino aldehyde derivatives via their tosylhydrazones. 2,3-O-Isopropylidene-D-glyceraldehyde (R)-1 (Scheme 2) prepared14 from di-O-isopropylidene-D-mannitol, was treated with tosylhydrazine in diethyl ether.15 The crude product was purified by chromatography on silica gel using a “dry column” technique16 to give tosylhydrazone (S)-2 (one isomer, semisolid) in 92% yield from di-Oisopropylidene-D-mannitol. In chloroform-d solution (S)-2 was unstable; however, in DMSO-d6 a satisfactory 1H NMR spectrum was obtained, and diagnostic signals in the 13C spectrum were recorded. HPLC analysis (Chiralcel OD-H column) indicated that obtained (S)-2 was virtually enantiomerically pure. Tosylhydrazone (S)-2 was used routinely in further reactions immediately after preparation; a sample stored for a few weeks in a refrigerator recemized almost completely. Apparently, racemization occurred markedly faster than decomposition, which may indicate reversible formation of the respective azoene.17 rac-2 obtained from rac-1 (prepared18 from 2,3-isopropylideneglycerol) was crystalline and could be stored for several weeks without visible decomposition. Sulfone 3a (3 equiv) was treated with iPrMgCl in THF (3.1 equiv) at room temperature, and the resulting

magnesium derivative was allowed to react with tosylhydrazone (S)-2 (1 equiv). After completion of the reaction (2 h) olefin 4a was obtained in 68% yield as a mixture of E and Z isomers in a ratio of 72:28. Samples of each of the isomers were separated and found to be enantiomerically pure (HPLC, Chiralcel OD-H column). Reaction of the magnesio-derivative of isopropyl phenyl sulfone 3b with (S)-2 was markedly slower. Olefination product 4b was obtained in 41% yield along with a side product (10-15% yield) to which the structure of carbinol 5a was assigned. An analogous reaction using of cyclohexyl phenyl sulfone 3c afforded the respective olefin 4c in 21% yield and carbinol 5b in 26% yield. Obviously carbinols 5a and 5b were generated in reactions of the respective sulfonyl anions with acetone originating from the acetonide protection group in 2. The stage of cleavage of the acetal function and its mechanism are not quite clear. Most likely, acetone is generated from allylic alcohol derivatives 4b or 4c by Lewis acid catalyzed elimination under the reaction conditions. However, fragmentation of the intermediate adducts, iv in Scheme 1 (broken-line arrows), cannot be excluded. 3,4:5,6-Di-O-isopropylidene-D-sorbitol19 was oxidized14 to give 2,3:4,5-di-O-isopropylidene-D-arabinose 6 (Scheme 3), and the latter was transformed into tosylhydrazone 7 in the usual way (69% yield). Reaction of 7 with magnesium derivative of sulfone 3a smoothly afforded olefin 8, which was isolated in 60% yield, E:Z ) 89:11. High selectivity of this olefination reaction with respect to the E-isomer is noteworthy. Prolinol 9 was oxidized with the Dess-Martin periodinane20 to give aldehyde 10, which was transformed into its tosylhydrazone 11 without isolation (73% from prolinol). Reaction of 11 with magnesio sulfone 3a afforded olefin 12 in 88% yield (E:Z ) 56:44). Next, we turned our attention to some acyclic acetaldehyde derivatives. Phenoxyacetaldehyde 13 (Scheme 4) was transformed into tosylhydrazone 15, and the latter was allowed to react with an anion generated from sulfone 3a. Labile O-phenyl allylic alcohol derivative 16 was isolated in 45% yield. N-Phenyl-N-tosyl-2-aminoethanal 14 in an analogous procedure through tosylhydrazone 17 afforded the respective derivative of allylic

(12) (a) Chandrasekhar, S.; Takhi, M.; Yadav, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 307-310. (b) Chandrasekhar, S.; Takhi, M.; Yadav, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5071-5074. (13) For reductive alkylation of aldehydes via tosylhydrazones, see: Vedejs, E.; Stolle, W. T. Tetraheron Lett. 1977, 135-138. (14) Elder, J. S.; Mann, J.; Walsh, E. B. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 31173125. (15) Bertz, S. H.; Dabbagh, G. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 116-119. (16) Pedersen, D. S.; Rosenbohm, C. Synthesis 2001, 2431-2434. (17) For a recent synthetic application of azoenes, see: van Bergen, M.; Gais, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4321-4328. (18) De Luca, L.; Giacomelli, G.; Porcheddu, A. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7907-7909.

(19) Jarosz, S.; Zamojski, A. Carbohydr. Chem. 1993, 12, 1223-1228. (20) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155-4156.

J. Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 17, 2004 5811

SCHEME 4

amine 18 in 57% yield. Finally, glyoxal 1,1-dimethyl acetal 19 gave tosylhydrazone 20 (61% yield, after chromatography) and then dimethylacetal of R,β-unsaturated aldehyde 21 in 57% yield. In conclusion, representative aldehydes bearing an alkoxy- or alkylamino group in the R-position in reaction with R-magnesio sulfones afford the respective derivatives of allylic alcohols or allylic amines. 2,3-O-Isopropylidene-D-glyceraldehyde afforded tosylhydrazone 2 and the olefination products 4 with virtually complete retention of optical activity. Experimental Section N′-{(1E)-[(4S)-2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]methylene}4-methylbenzenesulfonohydrazine (2). Di-O-isopropylideneD-mannitol (1.0 g, 3.81 mmol) was oxidized with sodium periodate14 (907 mg) in THF (15 mL) and water (1.7 mL), and the product was isolated with diethyl ether. The thus obtained solution of 2,3-O-isopropylidene-D-glyceraldehyde (R)-1 in diethyl ether/THF was dried over anhydrous MgSO4. After removal of the drying agent, tosylhydrazine (1.457 g, 7.82 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. The solvent was evaporated, and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel (30 g, hexanes/ethyl acetate, gradient elution) to give (S)-2 (2.097 g, 92% from di-O-isopropylidene-Dmannitol) as a colorless semisolid mass, [R]23D ) +18.6 (c 8.3, ethyl acetate). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 1.26 (6H, s), 2.39 (3H, s), 3.75 (1H, dd, J 8.5, 6.0 Hz), 4.05 (1H, dd J 8.6, 6.6 Hz), 4.42 (1H, dt, J 6.4, 6.2 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J 6.4 Hz), 7.41 (2H, apparent d, J 8.1 Hz), 7.68 (2H, apparent d, J 8.1 Hz), 11.36 (1H, s) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d ) δ 21.0 (3), 25.2 (3), 26.2 (3), 66.3 (2), 74.5 6 (2), 109.1 (0), 127.0 (1), 129.5 (1), 135.9 (0), 143.3 (0), 147.8 (1) ppm. Freshly prepared tosylhydrazone (S)-2 was enantiomerically pure by HPLC (see the following experiment). However, it racemized and slowly decomposed on storing; after several weeks racemization was virtually complete. rac-N′-{(1E)-[2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]methylene}4-methylbenzenesulfonohydrazine (2). 2,3-Isopropylideneglycerol (Solketal, Fluka) (1.00 g) was oxidized using the modified18 Swern method. The aldehyde was purified by chromatography and treated with tosylhydrazine as described above. rac-2 was obtained (776 mg, 34% from Solketal), mp 126-127 °C (tert-butyl methyl ether/hexane). HPLC analysis: a Chiralcel OD-H column, hexane/2-propanol, 4:1, 0.5 mL/min, tR 16.8 and 18.1 min for (R)- and (S)-enantiomers, respectively.

5812 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 17, 2004

(4S)-2,2-Dimethyl-4-[(1E)-4-phenylbut-1-enyl]-1,3-dioxolane (E-4a) and (4S)-2,2-Dimethyl-4-[(1Z)-4-phenylbut-1enyl]-1,3-dioxolane (Z-4a). General Procedure for Reaction of R-Magnesio Sulfones with Tosylhydrazones. To sulfone 3a21 (592 mg, 2.27 mmol, 3 equiv), stirred under argon at room temperature, was added iPrMgCl (2M in THF, 1.2 mL, 2.4 mmol) (vigorous gas evolution occurred). The mixture was stirred for 1.5 h, and then tosylhydrazone (S)-2 (227 mg, 0.76 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added portionwise. After consecutive 2 h, the reaction was quenched with concentrated aqueous ammonia (0.3 mL). The solid was filtered off and washed with THF. The combined filtrates were evaporated, and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel (20 g, hexane/ethyl acetate) to give 4a (120 mg, 68%) as a colorless oil, Z:E ) 21:79, by HPLC (hexanes/ethyl acetate, 9:1), tR 4.3 min (Z-) and 4.6 min (Eisomer). Samples of both isomers were isolated using preparative HPLC; enantiomeric purity of each of the isomers was confirmed by analysis on a chiral HPLC column. Data for 4a (Z): [R]D -13.2 (c 0.8, hexane). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.36 (3H, s), 1.39 (3H, s) 2.3-2.5 (2H, m), 2.5-2.9 (2H, m), 3.35 (1H, t, J 8.1 Hz), 3.76 (1H, dd J 7.1, 6.1 Hz), 4.70 (1H, dd J 15.5, 8.0 Hz), 5.33-5.48 (1H, m), 5.57-5.75 (1H, m), 7.1-7.4 (5H, m) ppm; on irradiation at δ 2.41 multiplet at δ 5.33-5.48 collapsed to a doublet of doublets, J 10.6, 8,56 Hz, and that at δ 5.57-5.76 to a doublet, J 10.8 Hz. 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 26.0 (3), 26.8 (3), 29.7 (2), 35.7 (2), 69.2 (2), 71.9 (1), 109.0 (0), 126.0 (1), 128.0 (1), 128.3 (1), 128.5 (1), 133.5 (1), 141.2 (0) ppm. Data for 4a (E): [R]D + 24.4 (c 3.8, hexane). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.38 (3H, br s), 1.42 (3H, s,), 2.30-2.45 (2H, m), 2.60-2.80 (2H, m), 3.53 (1H, t, J 8.0 Hz), 4.04 (1H, dd, J 6.1, 2.0 Hz), 4.354.55 (1H, m), 5.46 (1H, ddt, J 15.3, 7.8, 1.4 Hz), 5.83 (1H dt J 15.3, 6.6 Hz), 7.1-7.4 (5H, m) ppm; on irradiation at δ 2.37 multiplet at δ 5.46 collapsed to a doublet of doublets, J 15.2, 7.9 Hz, and that at δ 5.83 to a doublet, J 15.2 Hz. 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 26.0 (3), 26.7 (3), 34.1 (2), 35.3 (2), 69.4 (2), 77.2 (1), 109.0 (0), 125.8 (1), 127.9 (1), 128.28 (1), 128.34 (1), 134.7 (1), 141.5 (0) ppm. 4a(E) HRMS (EI): calcd for C15H20O2, 232.14633, found 232.14694. rac-2,2-Dimethyl-4-[(1E)-4-phenylbut-1-enyl]-1,3-dioxolane (E-4a) and rac-2,2-dimethyl-4-[(1Z)-4-phenylbut-1enyl]-1,3-dioxolane (Z-4a) were prepared in an analogous way from rac-1. Pure compounds rac-Z-4a and rac-E-4a were separated by preparative HPLC and analyzed on chiral analytical HPLC columns. Resolution of rac-(Z)-4a was achieved on a Chiralcel OD-H column (hexane/2-propanol, 9:1): tR 10.1 min (S-enantiomer) and 11.4 min (R)-enantiomer. rac-(E)-4a was separated on a Chiralcel OJ column (hexane-2-propanol, 9:1): tR 14.1 min (S)-enantiomer and 16.4 min (R)-enantiomer.

Acknowledgment. We thank Professor Sławomir Jarosz of our Institute for a gift of 3,4:5,6-di-O-isopropylidene-D-sorbitol. Financial support from the State Committee for Scientific Research, Grant 3 T09A 134 18 is acknowledged. Supporting Information Available: General experimental conditions; full experimental procedures for compounds 4b, 4c, 5a, 5b, 7, (E)-8, (Z)-8, 11, (E)-12, (Z)-12, 15, (E)-16, (Z)16, 17, (E)-18, (Z)-18, 20, (E)-21, and (Z)-21; and NMR spectra for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. JO0499118 (21) Keck, G. E.; Savin, K. A.; Weglarz, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 3194-3204.