Subscriber access provided by Queen Mary, University of London
Environmental Processes
On-road Chemical Transformation as an Important Mechanism of NO2 Formation Bo Yang, K. Max Zhang, Wei Xu, Shaojun Zhang, Stuart A Batterman, Richard Baldauf, Parikshit Deshmukh, Richard Snow, Ye Wu, Qiang Zhang, Zhenhua Li, and Xian Wu Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05648 • Publication Date (Web): 22 Mar 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 24, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
On-road Chemical Transformation as an Important Mechanism of NO2 Formation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Abstract
21
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) not only is linked with adverse effects on the respiratory system, but also
22
contributes to the formation of ground-level ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Our
23
curbside monitoring data analysis in Detroit, MI and Atlanta, GA strongly suggests that a large
24
fraction of NO2 is produced during the “tailpipe-to-road” stage. To substantiate this finding, we
25
designed and carried out a field campaign to measure the same exhaust plumes at the tailpipe-level
26
by a Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) and at the on-road level by an Electric
27
Vehicle-based mobile platform. Furthermore, we employed a turbulent reacting flow model, CTAG,
28
to simulate the on-road chemistry behind a single vehicle. We found that a three-reaction (NO-NO2-
29
O3) system can largely capture the rapid NO to NO2 conversion (with timescale ~ seconds)
30
observed in the field studies. To distinguish the contributions from different mechanisms to near-
31
road NO2, we clearly defined a set of NO2/NOx ratios at different plume evolution stages, namely
32
tailpipe, on-road, curbside, near-road and ambient background. Our findings from curbside
Bo Yang1, K. Max Zhang1, W. David Xu1, Shaojun Zhang1, Stuart Batterman2, Richard W. Baldauf3,4, Parikshit Deshmukh5, Richard Snow3, Ye Wu6,7, Qiang Zhang6, Zhenhua Li6, Xian Wu6 1
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 2 School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA 4 U.S. EPA, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, National Vehicle and Fuels Emissions Laboratory, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA 5 Jacobs Technology, Inc., Durham, NC 27713, USA 6 School of Environment, State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, PR China 7 State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing, 100084, PR China
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 2 of 26
33
monitoring, on-road experiments and simulations imply the on-road oxidation of NO by ambient O3
34
is a significant, but so far ignored, contributor to curbside and near-road NO2.
35 36
TOC/Abstract Art
Task1: Curbside monitoring data analysis RBG : Background NO2/NOx ratio
RCS : Curbside NO2/NOx ratio ROR : On-Road NO2/NOx ratio
RNR : Near-road NO2/NOx ratio ~ 100 m
Ambient wind Ambient O3 RTP : Tailpipe NO2/NOx ratio
Task2: On-Road Chasing and PEMS data analysis
Task 3: On-Road CFD Simulation
PEMS ROR (%)
37 38 39
Key Finding: The on-road chemistry is a major contributor to the curbside NO2 concentration. Word count: 5155 (text) + 1500 (5 figures x 300 words per figure) + 300 (1 table x 300 words per table) = 6955 words
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
40
Introduction
41
The transportation sector contributes about 30% to 40% of the emitted nitrogen oxides (NOx) 1, 2,
42
and the health effects of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are a public health concern worldwide 3-6. As
43
part of the revised the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the U.S.
44
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) established monitoring requirements in urban areas
45
to measure NO2 levels within 50 m of major roads as part of the NO2 NAAQS. In Europe, NO2 is
46
one of the major contributors to urban air quality problems, and has been routinely monitored in
47
the near-road or street canyon environments3. The European Environment Agency estimated
48
71,000 premature deaths due to NO2 exposure in Europe, higher than the estimated mortality
49
caused by ground-level ozone 3. From around 1990 onwards, the total emissions of NOx declined
50
significantly in Europe by ~56% 1, but roadside concentrations of NO2 declined much less than
51
expected 7. ~94% of exceedances of the European NO2 annual limit were observed at traffic
52
monitoring sites 3. In China, ambient NO2 concentrations in some megacities (e.g., Beijing,
53
Shanghai) have persisted and exceeded the annual standard limit even though the concentrations
54
of other gaseous pollutants have decreased significantly during the same period 3, 8, 9. Even
55
though China does not have a nationwide near-road air quality monitoring network, recently
56
released near-road concentrations well exceed the current standard (e.g., an average exceedance
57
of 20 to 30 µg m-3 for five near-road sites in Beijing)10. Furthermore, besides being a criteria
58
pollutant itself, NO2 is also widely adopted as a marker for traffic-related air pollution in health
59
studies11-13. For example, positive associations of NO2 with mortality suggest that traffic
60
pollution relates to premature death 14.
61
In the complex roadway environments, direct tailpipe NO2 emissions, secondary NO2 through
62
on-road and near-road NOx titration and background NO2 all lead to near-road NO2. Therefore, a
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
63
better understanding of the contributions from different pathways to near-road NO2 is necessary
64
for not only effective air quality management, but also evaluating the role of NO2 as a marker in
65
health studies, as near-road NO2 could be dominated by different pathways at different
66
conditions.
67
Moreover, the NO2/NOx ratio (typically by volume) is a widely used parameter in air quality
68
management due to its applicability across the scales, from tailpipes to ambient environments.
69
Both highway dispersion modeling (for NO2) and regional air quality modeling (for O3, PM2.5,
70
etc.) require inputs of NO2/NOx ratios, and previous studies have shown that both types of
71
modeling are sensitive to those inputs 15, 16. Thus, another major motivation for our study is to
72
elucidate the physical and chemical processes governing near-road NO2 in order to provide
73
appropriate NO2/NOx ratios for highway dispersion and regional air quality modeling efforts.
74
To facilitate the subsequent discussions, it is necessary to clearly define NO2/NOx ratios at
75
different stages of plume evolution, listed in Table 1. The tailpipe NO2/NOx ratio (RTP), also
76
called the primary NO2/NOx emission ratio, is defined as the NO2/NOx ratio at the vehicle
77
tailpipe exit. RTP for gasoline vehicles is typically around 5% or lower17-19, but can be higher for
78
diesel vehicles equipped with diesel particulate filters (DPF)20-22. The curbside NO2/NOx ratio,
79
RCS, is defined as the ratio at the edge of roadways. We further define the ratio between the
80
tailpipe exit and the curbside as the on-road NO2/NOx ratio, ROR. The ratio in the near-road
81
environments (from the curbside to ~ 100 m) is defined as near-road NO2/NOx ratio, RNR. Lastly,
82
the ratio in the ambient environments is defined as background (or ambient) NO2/NOx ratio, RBG.
83
It is well recognized that NOx transforms chemically from NO to NO2 through titration of O3 in
84
the near-road environment, resulting in RNR differing from RCS. The near-road chemical
85
transformation has been observed in several field studies23-26. In our previous study, we
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 26
Page 5 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
86
estimated RCS to be around 20 to 40% based on near-road monitoring data collected at several
87
Texas roadways in the summer of 2007 16. The roadways studied had low diesel traffic, and the
88
penetration of diesel particulate filters was very low in 2007. Therefore, the relatively high RCS
89
must be explained by mechanisms in addition to the presence of diesel traffic.
90
Table 1. The defined NO2/NOx ratio at different locations in a traffic environment Location
NO2/NOx ratio
Description
Tailpipe exit
RTP
The NO2/NOx ratio at the tailpipe exit, also called the primary NO2/NOx ratio, which can be measured by emission testing.
On-road
ROR
The NO2/NOx ratios on the roadway, from the tailpipe to the curbside
Curbside
RCS
The NO2/NOx ratio at the curbsides
Near-road
RNR
The NO2/NOx ratio from the curbside to about 100 m away from the roadways
Ambient background
RBG
The NO2/NOx ratio from the curbside to the near-road region (0 ~ 100 m)
91
This study aims to investigate the physiochemical mechanisms that lead to enhanced curbside
92
NO2/NOx ratios (RCS). We posit that on-road (i.e., “tailpipe-to-road” 27) chemical reactions are a
93
major contributor to NO2 production, resulting in an evolution from RTP to ROR and to RCS. To
94
our knowledge, on-road chemical transformation of NOx has not been explicitly studied.
95
However, several recent studies have implicitly indicated the significant role of on-road NO2
96
production. The curbside measurements of NO, NO2 and O3 in street-canyon environments at
97
two German cities showed that secondary NO2 production was responsible for a major fraction
98
of measured NO228. One can deduce from the study that the referred production of NO2 most
99
likely took place on the streets. Another study of near-road monitoring data at Las Vegas, NV
100
indicated the RCS ranging from 0.25 to 0.35, substantially higher than the anticipated RTP29, which
101
we argue can potentially be explained by the on-road production of NO2. Even though the term
102
“on-road” NO2/NOx ratio was used in the Las Vegas study29, a close examination of the reported
103
methodology suggested that the term was referred to RCS according to our definition.
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
104
In this study, we present the supporting evidence from 1) curbside monitoring near two major
105
highways in Detroit, MI and Atlanta, GA, respectively, 2) an on-road field experiment in
106
Research Triangle Park (RTP), NC, and 3) on-road simulations using a turbulent reacting flow
107
model. This work is intended to improve future modeling of near-road NO2 concentrations, air
108
quality and transportation management, and health studies on traffic-related pollutants.
109
Curbside Monitoring
110 111
Site description and field measurements
112
Detroit, MI Field measurements were performed at several monitoring sites in Detroit, MI,
113
including the Eliza Howell near-road sites, starting fall 2010 and concluded in late summer 2011.
114
For this study, we used data collected between September 2010 and June 2011, when the traffic
115
and meteorological conditions were both well characterized. These sites were originally
116
deployed as part of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and USEPA National Near-
117
Road Study for a one-year period, then continued by the Michigan Department of Environmental
118
Quality (MDEQ) to the present. Data from these sites have being used in the Near-Road
119
Exposures and Effects of Urban Air Pollutants Study (NEXUS), which examined the relationship
120
between near-roadway exposures to air pollutants and respiratory outcomes in a cohort of
121
asthmatic children who live close to major roadways in Detroit, Michigan 30.
122
The Eliza Howell 1 monitoring site (EH1; 42°23'09.6"N, 83°15'58.9"W) is placed at the
123
curbside of Interstate I-96/Jeffries Freeway (Figure S1a in the Supporting Information (SI)). On
124
the opposite side, site EH4 is located ~100 m south of I-96, which served as an upwind site when
125
EH1 was downwind of I-96, and allowed us to quantify the contribution of background NO and
126
NO2 to those measured at EH1. The immediate area is mostly open parkland with some trees and
127
playing fields; surrounding areas are mostly low-rise commercial and residential buildings. 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 26
Page 7 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
128
NO/NO2/NOx were measured at a height of 3 m using chemiluminescence (Teledyne ML9841B
129
Nitrogen Oxides Analyzer)31, which reports NO2 as the difference between NOx and NO. Wind
130
speed and wind direction were measured at a height of 10 m. Both NOx and surface meteorology
131
were also measured at EH4, Hourly ozone (O3) measurements from the Allen Park (AP) site
132
(AQS Site ID: 261630001; 42°13'43.0"N, 83°12'29.9"W), located ~18.5 km south of EH1 and
133
~200 m southeast from the closest major roadway (I-75), were obtained from the USEPA Air
134
Quality System (www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/). A closer O3 measurement site, E7Mile (AQS
135
Site ID: 261630019; 42°25'50.9"N, 83°00'01.0"W), was not selected due to more than three
136
months missing data between September 2010 and June 2011.
137
Traffic on I-96 is normally free-flowing with an established speed of 70 mph for cars and 65
138
mph for trucks. The annual average daily traffic (AADT) on this I-96 segment are 155,000 31.
139
Based on vehicle classification data measured during the study period at the EH1 site (using
140
radar to classify vehicle size), the percentage of heavy-duty diesel trucks (HDDT) for every 5
141
minutes averaged ~ 3.0%.
142
Atlanta, GA Continuous air quality monitoring data of NO, NO2, and O3 were obtained at two
143
sites in Atlanta, GA: a curbside site off Interstate I-85 Freeway near Georgia Institute of
144
Technology (NRGT; AQS Site ID:13-121-0056; 33°46'41.934" N, 84°23'29.1048" W) and a
145
background site in South DeKalb (SDK; AQS Site ID: 13-089-0002; 33°41'16.692" N,
146
84°17'25.7280" W), about 13.5 km southeast from the NRGT site. Figure S1b in the SI depicts
147
the locations of the two sites. The monitoring at NRGT started near the end of May 2014. We
148
analyzed data collected between January 2015 and March 2017 since minute-level data of of NO,
149
NO2, and O3 from both NRGT and SDK are available during this period.
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
150
I-85 is a major Interstate Freeway that runs northeast–southwest in Georgia. The AADT on this
151
segment is ~332,000 in 2015, and ~353,700 in 2016, accordingly to the closest traffic monitoring
152
station (ID: 1215481; 33°46'23.8800" N, 84°23'24.0000" W)
153
(http://trafficserver.transmetric.com/gdot-prod/tcdb.jsp?siteid=1215481). The truck percentage is
154
~3.7% based on another nearby station (ID: 1216118; 33°46'32.88" N, 84°23'24.72" W)
155
(http://trafficserver.transmetric.com/gdot-prod/tcdb.jsp?siteid=1216118).
156
Curbside Data Analysis
157
To investigate the role of on-road chemical transformation of NOx, we screened the Detroit data
158
using the following criteria: First, we selected daytime data (6AM-6PM) under south-dominant
159
wind conditions (101.25 < θ < 258.75, θ is the wind direction in degrees) so that EH1 was
160
downwind of I-96. Next, we subtracted the upwind NO2 and NOx concentrations (i.e., at EH4)
161
from the corresponding values at EH1, thus reflecting the net contributions of highway
162
emissions. Finally, we set a net NOx concentration threshold to ensure the curbside data reflect
163
the highway influence. In other words, the curbside NOx concentrations are expected to be higher
164
than the upwind NOx concentrations. The higher the threshold value, the more confident we are
165
of the highway influence, given the uncertainties and detection limits in the NOx measurements.
166
But the same time, a higher threshold value may also exclude some low-traffic conditions. We
167
tested the sensitivity of our results to the net NOx concentration threshold. We followed similar
168
steps to analyze the Atlanta data. First, we selected daytime data (8AM-5PM) under east-
169
dominant wind conditions (11.25 < θ < 168.75) so that NRGT was downwind of I-85. Next, we
170
subtracted the ambient NO2 and NOx concentrations (i.e., at SDK) from the corresponding values
171
at NRGT to reflect the net contributions of highway emissions. We also tested the sensitivity of
172
net NOx concentration thresholds.
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
80
Data Kept R-squared Slope Intercept
20
d) Atlanta, GA (I-85)
80
18
60
16
0.8 0.4
R-squared
0.6
-1 -2
Intercept
40
O3 (ppb)
10
20
30
40
50
20
30
40
0.2
12 10
20 0
10
0.0
0.2 0.0
-4
0.2
20 0
0.0
0.2 0.0
-3
40
0.4
Slope
60
0.6
% of data were kept
0.6
R-squared
0.4
20
Intercept
Data Kept R-squared Slope Intercept
0
14
c) Detroit, MI (I-96)
0
80
1.0
O3 (ppb)
20
1.0
60
0
40
1.0
20
0.8
0.8
1.0
173
0
100
0
0
0.8
20
50
0.6
0
100
Slope
50
150
40
0.4
100
100
150
40
NOx (ppb) 200
80
NOx (ppb) 200
60
60
Curbside NO2 NOx , R CS (%)
60
b) Atlanta, GA (I-85), Daytime East Dominated Wind
40
a) Detroit, MI (I-96), Daytime South Dominated Wind
80
Curbside NO2 NOx , R CS (%)
80
% of data were kept
Page 9 of 26
50
174 175 176 177 178 179 180
Figure 1. Curbside NO2/NOx ratio (RCS) vs ambient O3 concentrations (ppb) with net NOx threshold 40 ppb at a) Detroit, MI (I-96) during the daytime and south dominated wind (101.25 < θ < 258.75) and; b) Atlanta, GA (I-85) during the daytime and east dominated wind (11.25 < θ < 168.75); Linear regression parameters (slope, intercept and R2) of the RCS vs O3 relationships and the amount of data included (as percentage of the total data available) as functions of net NOx concentration thresholds for (c) Detroit, MI (I-96) and (d) Atlanta, GA (I-85).
181
Figure 1 summarizes the main findings from our curbside analysis of the Detroit and Atlanta
182
datasets. The relationships between net curbside NO2/NOx ratios (RCS) and ambient O3
183
concentrations (with net NOx concentrations represented by color scales) are illustrated in
184
Figures 1a and 1b, for Detroit and Atlanta, respectively. The overall linear relationships between
185
O3 concentrations and net RCS from these two curbside measurements support the significance of
NOx Concentration Threshold (ppb)
NOx Concentration Threshold (ppb)
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
186
on-road chemical transformation. In other words, higher ambient O3 concentrations, once mixed
187
with highway emissions, convert NO to NO2 during the tailpipe-to-road process. Conversely, if
188
the role of on-road chemical transformation was insignificant, then net RCS would not show a
189
relationship with O3 concentrations.
190
Figures 1c and 1d depict the sensitivities of linear regression parameters (slope, intercept and R2
191
as shown in Figures 1a and 1b) and the amount of data included (as percentage of the total data
192
available) to the different net NOx concentration thresholds, ranging from 10 to 50 ppb. As
193
expected, the percentage of data included decreases with the net NOx threshold for both
194
highways. At the 10-ppb threshold, around 76% data are included in Detroit, MI and 94% data
195
were kept in Atlanta, GA. At the 50-ppb threshold, both of the two datasets dropped to around
196
50%. However, the slopes from both datasets appear not sensitive to the net NOx threshold, only
197
changing from 0.71 to 0.81 for Detroit and from 0.66 to 0.73 for Atlanta, respectively. The R2
198
values for Detroit, varying from 0.73 to 0.76, were not sensitive to the NOx threshold, while
199
those for Atlanta, were more sensitive to the threshold, increasing from 0.57 to 0.70 as the NOx
200
threshold increases from 10 to 50 ppb. Figures 1a and 1b were both plotted at 40 ppb net NOx
201
threshold to achieve a balance of high percentage data inclusion and high R2.
202
The intercepts for Detroit and Atlanta both appear sensitive to the NOx threshold, but with
203
opposite directions. Physically, the intercepts represent the tailpipe NO2/NOx ratios, RTP. The
204
intercepts for Detroit are negative (albeit small in magnitude), approaching positive values as the
205
NOx threshold increases. The intercepts for Atlanta are positive, starting with relative large
206
magnitude, e.g., 15% when the NOx threshold is set to 10 ppb and decreasing to ~11% at the 50-
207
ppb net NOx threshold. One contributing factor to the negative intercepts in Detroit was found to
208
be associated with the traffic patterns. Figure 1a indicates high NOx conditions predominately 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 26
Page 11 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
209
appear when ambient O3 concentrations are low, which represented the early morning and late
210
afternoon traffic peaks. Those high-NOx and low-O3 conditions lead to a small fraction of NO
211
being converted and thus low NO2/NOx ratios. The clustering of data points of low NO2/NOx
212
ratios and low O3 concentrations pushes the linear regression towards the negative intercept side.
213
By contrast, high NOx conditions are evenly distributed at the NGRT site across the whole range
214
of O3 concentrations, suggesting a weak diurnal traffic pattern. It is worth noting that I-85
215
segment near NRGT is one of the most trafficked highways in the U.S.
216
Figure 1a raises the question over the contribution of on-road chemistry to curbside NO2
217
concentrations in Detroit since conditions with high net RCS and high ambient O3 appear when
218
net NOx concentrations are relatively low. Figure S2 in the SI illustrates the relationship between
219
net NO2 concentrations (i.e., from both primary NO2 emissions and on-road chemical
220
transformation) and ambient O3 from the Detroit dataset, which presents a positive linear trend
221
and implies a significant contribution from on-road chemical transformation to curbside NO2
222
concentrations. Furthermore, Figure 1b (based on the Atlanta data) corroborates this conclusion
223
as conditions with high net RCS and high ambient O3 appear with high net NOx concentrations
224
(thus high net NO2 concentrations). Moreover, Figure S3 in the SI depicted the relationships
225
between RCS and solar radiation at different ambient O3 concentrations. The results suggest that
226
RCS is not very sensitive to the NO2 photolysis rates (with solar radiation as a surrogate), which
227
in turn indicates that the titration of O3 by NO is the dominant reaction. Future studies are needed
228
to conduct detailed analysis of the contributions from different pathways (such as ambient
229
background, tailpipe or primary NO2 emissions, on-road chemistry, near-road chemistry) to
230
curbside/near-road NO2 concentrations.
11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
231
We acknowledge the uncertainties in the curbside data analysis. For example, the NRGT does
232
not have a near-road upwind site for us to reliably estimate net NOx contributions, which at least
233
partially explain why the regression parameters are much more sensitive to the net NOx threshold
234
in Atlanta than Detroit. In addition, we did not have near-road upwind O3 measurements for
235
either Detroit or Atlanta. Several studies reported spatial variations of O3 concentrations in urban
236
areas 32-34. The O3 concentrations measured at the ambient sites may not accurately represent the
237
near-road upwind conditions. Nevertheless, the curbside data from two different highways
238
showed very consistent trends. Together, the curbside analysis provides strong evidence for the
239
significant role of on-road NOx transformation.
240 241
On-Road Experiment
242 243
Field measurements
244
Motivated by the finding from the curbside data analysis described earlier, we designed an on-
245
road field campaign to gather further evidence on the on-road NOx chemical transformation. The
246
overall concept of the on-road experiment was to measure the same exhaust plumes both at the
247
tailpipe-level by Portable Emissions Monitoring System (PEMS) and at the on-road level (after
248
initial dilution) by a mobile chasing platform. Then we would expect to observe noticeable
249
differences in the tailpipe-level and on-road level NO2/NOx ratios with significant on-road NOx
250
chemical transformation. However, it is technically challenging to directly measure on-road
251
NO2/NOx ratios (ROR) because reliable, fast-responding instruments for NO (or NOx) are not
252
readily available. Wild and coworkers recently developed a fast-responding instrument via
253
Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy 35. But we did not have access to that instrument. As an
254
alternative, our analysis relied on CO2 and NO2 by defining CO2-normalized NO2 concentration
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 26
Page 13 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
255
as △NO2/△CO2, essentially using CO2 as a dilution indictor, for PEMS and mobile platform
256
measurements, respectively. Details for this analysis are provided later.
257
In our experiment, we employed an electric vehicle-based mobile platform equipped with air
258
quality analyzers at 1 s sampling intervals to conduct the on-road chasing measurements,
259
capturing the on-road concentrations of CO2 (Quantum Cascade Laser, Aerodyne Research, Inc.)
260
and NO2 (Cavity Attenuation Phase Shift, Aerodyne Research, Inc.). The sampling probe was
261
positioned at the bottom front of the mobile platform, around the same height as the exhaust
262
tailpipe of the vehicle being followed. We detected a six-second delay in response due to the
263
sampling line, and this delay was accounted for in the subsequent data analysis. The chasing
264
routes were recorded using a high-precision GPS unit (Crescent R100, Hemisphere GPS). A
265
webcam was operated in the front seat of the mobile monitoring vehicle and recorded the traffic
266
conditions continuously during the on-road measurements.
267
The vehicle being chased (referred to as “target vehicle”) was a 2003 Ford F350 diesel powered
268
truck (engine displacement 6.0 L, 8 cylinders, ~53,000 miles, 7940 lbs actual weight). Tailpipe-
269
level CO2 and NO2 concentrations were measured using a Portable Emissions Monitoring
270
System (PEMS) (SEMTECH® Ecostar; Sensors, Inc.). The PEMS samples directly from the
271
subject vehicle’s raw exhaust and is capable of providing on-board CFR 1065 compliant
272
emissions determinations at a rate of 1 Hz as the subject vehicle is being operated on the
273
highway. The PEMS utilizes a nondispersive infrared (NDIR) sensor for CO2 measurements and
274
a nondispersive ultraviolet (NDUV) sensor for NO2 measurements.
275
The on-road field campaign took place from February 22nd till March 4th, 2016 in Research
276
Triangle Park (RTP), NC. The measurements conducted in the afternoon of February 29
277
(FEB29PM), the morning of March 1 (MAR01AM), and the afternoon of March 1 (MAR01PM)
278
focused on comparing PEMS and on-road chasing results. The corresponding ambient ozone 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
279
concentrations (with standard deviation) during the sampling periods were 39.0 ± 2.6 ppb, 31.5 ±
280
6.5 ppb, and 38.6 ± 2.5 ppb, respectively.
281
On-Road Data Analysis
282
We started the data analysis by screening the videos recorded during the experiment to select the
283
time segments without the presence of heavy duty vehicles around the target vehicle. Emissions
284
from heavy duty vehicles may distort the on-road chasing results. For the selected time segments,
285
we processed the chasing data using 2-second average to remove noise in the raw 1-second data.
286
Then a two-step synchronization was adopted to further process the data. The first-step was to
287
synchronize the chasing CO2 and NO2 signals, which usually required 1-second or 2-second time
288
shift in time series, to identify synchronized CO2 and NO2 spikes. At the end of the first step, we
289
obtained a series of synchronized CO2 and NO2 spikes that captured on-road plume signals with
290
high confidence. The second step was to synchronize chasing plume signals with PEMS data.
291
The distance between the chasing object and the mobile platform was usually within 20 m. Given
292
the exit velocity ~20 m s-1, the time delay between the PEMS and chasing signals should be ~ 1
293
second. In practice, the acceleration of the truck usually caused a large spike in both PEMS and
294
chasing signals, which helped us to determine the time delay. At the end of the second step, we
295
acquired a list of paired PEMS and chasing signals, representing the same exhaust plumes
296
measured by the two methods.
297
The CO2-normalized NO2 concentration (△NO2/△CO2) can be visualized by the slope of NO2
298
vs. CO2 scatter plots. Figure 2 illustrates how we calculated CO2-normalized NO2 concentration
299
using one pair of synchronized plume signals as an example.
14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 26
Page 15 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
300 301
Figure 2. One pair of synchronized plume signals of NO2 vs CO2 concentrations based on (a)
302
on-road chasing measurement and (b) tailpipe-level PEMS measurement for deriving CO2-
303
normalized NO2 concentrations.
304
We identified a total of 109 synchronized plume signals, and calculated the ratio of CO2-
305
normalized NO2 concentrations from on-road chasing over tailpipe PEMS measurements for
306
each plume signal, referred to as RatioChase/PEMS, i.e., a RatioChase/PEMS > 1 implies on-road NO2
307
production. Figure 3 shows the distributions of this ratio and coefficients of determination (R2)
308
for the linear regressions (as indicated in Figure 2). RatioChase/PEMS > 1 for all 109 plume signals
309
with the median value as 1.87, and R2 values for both PEMS and on-road chasing measurements
310
are high (with the median values over 0.8), suggesting the results are reasonably robust.
311
15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
312 313 314 315 316 317 318
Figure 3. The distributions of (a) RatioChase/PEMS (i.e., the ratio of CO2-normalized NO2 concentrations from on-road chasing over tailpipe PEMS measurements) and (b) R2 values for deriving CO2-normalized NO2 concentrations from Chasing and PEMS measurements. In both (a) and (b), the box represents the middle 50% of the data, extending from the 25th to the 75th percentiles; the horizontal line through the center of the box is the median; the whiskers represent 10th and 90th percentiles.
319
In summary, the results from the on-road experiment further indicate the significant role of on-
320
road NOx chemical transformation.
321
Coupled on-road turbulence and chemistry modeling
322
Methodology for on-road simulations
323
As the third part of our study, we employed the Comprehensive Turbulent Aerosol Dynamics
324
and Gas Chemistry (CTAG) model to simulate the coupled on-road turbulent mixing and
325
chemistry of individual exhaust plumes to test whether the rapid transformation observed is
326
kinetically feasible under typical on-road conditions. CTAG is an appropriate model for this
327
purpose as it was designed to simulate transport and transformation of multiple air pollutants,
328
e.g., from emission sources to ambient background 36-41.
329
Shown in Figure 4, the computational domain was constructed based on a single lane with an
330
individual passenger car. The domain dimensions are 30 m (L) x 15 m (W) x 10 m (H). The
16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 26
Page 17 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
331
positive Y direction is the downwind crosswind direction. The geometry of the passenger car
332
was modeled using a realistic shape rather than block shapes.
333
Periodic Conditions
334
Figure 4. Computational domain and mesh around the car
335
While full-scale simulations with detailed site-specific conditions (e.g., capturing multiple
336
vehicles corresponding to traffic mix, highway geometry, etc.) are beyond the scope of this
337
paper, we utilized the environmental conditions captured in the Detroit dataset to set up the
338
simulations. The velocity inlet boundary was specified on the left and top sides of the domain to
339
simulate the ambient south crosswind speed. The periodic boundary conditions with the flow
340
rate based on vehicle speed (70 mph or 31.3 m s-1 as in the I-96 segment), specified on both ends
341
of the computational domain, was adopted to represent the continuous traffic flow. The
342
passenger car’s tailpipe, 60 mm in diameter, is parallel to the road and specified as a mass flow
343
inlet with a total mass flow rate of 0.055 kg s-1 and exhaust temperature of 480 K 42. The
344
tailpipe-level NOx emission rate was estimated by using EPA's MOtor Vehicle Emission
345
Simulator (MOVES). A NO2/NOx volume ratio of 5% was assigned at the tailpipe level (i.e.,
346
RTP=5%). The road surface was modeled as a moving wall at the vehicle speed, thus representing
347
the relative motion between the vehicle and the road. Ambient background NOx and NO2
348
concentrations for each case are specified based on the Detroit data (EH4).
349
We modeled the dispersion and chemical reactions using steady-state Reynolds averaged Navier-
350
Stokes (RANS) turbulence model to simulate the flow fields and species transport. The Finite 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
351
Rate (FR) chemical reaction model43 was coupled with the eddy dissipation method (EDM)44,
352
referred to as the EDM/FR model, in which turbulence–chemistry interaction is accounted for
353
through the representation of the source term the species transport equations. Both an Arrhenius
354
rate based on the global chemistry mechanism, and a turbulent mixing rate based on the
355
Magnussen–Hjertager expression are estimated44. The smaller of the two rates is then used as the
356
source term. We adopted a simplified chemical mechanism using a four reaction (NO-NO2-O3)
357
system shown in Table S1 with reaction constants taken from the CB05 mechanism 45. These
358
reactions have been shown to be dominant in near-source environments 16, 46. The photolysis rate
359
of NO2 was determined based on our previous work16 (also described in Section S4 of the SI)
360
and average solar radiation at the near-road site in Detroit obtained from the U.S. National Solar
361
Radiation Database. The governing equations of the Realizable k-e model (one type of RANS
362
models) and the species transport equation were presented in Section S2. The mesh resolution
363
sensitivity study was illustrated in Figures S4 and S5.
364
Results from on-road simulations
365
Figure 5a illustrates the contour of ROR on a horizontal plane at the tailpipe height in the simulation
366
domain (Figure 4) with the ambient ozone concentration set to be 40 ppb. Some representative ROR
367
values are marked in along the tailpipe centerline with the corresponding residence time, estimated
368
by dividing the distance to the tailpipe center by the driving velocity. Figure 5b shows ROR values
369
along the tailpipe centerline as a function of resident time at levels of ambient O3 concentrations
370
(20 ppb, 40 ppb, and 60 ppb).
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 26
Page 19 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
a) ROR (%)
24% 0.8 s 24 m
23% 0.6 s 18 m
21% 0.4 s 12 m
17% 0.2 s 6m
371
372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379
Figure 5. a) On-road NO2/NOx ratio (ROR) contour plot on a horizontal plane at the tailpipe height in the simulation domain illustrated in Figure 4. The ambient ozone concentration is set to be 40 ppb. The black solid line is the tailpipe centerline. Values along the solid line represent the resident time and corresponding ROR. b) ROR along the tailpipe centerline for different ambient ozone concentrations.
380
expected, ROR remain nearly a constant if chemical reactions are turned off. Furthermore, the
381
coupled turbulent mixing and simplified NO-NO2-O3 chemistry can achieve the NO2 conversion
382
rate similar to the order of magnitude of the observed values, though a direct comparison is not
383
feasible. The values of RatioChase/PEMS derived from the on-road experiment are roughly equivalent
384
of changes in NO2/NOx ratios. Given the ~1-second transport from the tailpipe of the target vehicle
385
to the probe of the mobile platform, a RatioChase/PEMS of 2 suggests doubling of NO2/NOx ratios in
386
less than 1 second at ambient O3 concentration ~40 ppb. The modeling results show that even at
It is revealed from Figure 5 that higher the ambient O3 concentration leads to higher ROR. As
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
387
relatively low ambient O3 level (e.g., 20 ppb), ROR can double of RTP in less than 1 second. Figure
388
S6 in the SI illustrates the ROR values along the tailpipe centerline as a function of resident time at
389
different NO2 photolysis rates with ambient O3 concentration at 40 ppb. The results suggest that
390
ROR is not sensitive to NO2 photolysis rates, which further supports NO+O3 as the dominant
391
reaction during the “tailpipe-to-road” stage. As mentioned earlier, ROR also depends on the relative
392
amounts of NOx and O3. More in-depth studies are needed to explore how different traffic and
393
meteorology conditions affect on-road NOx transformation.
394 395
Implications
396
Our study has provided experimental evidence, through curbside data analysis and on-road field
397
measurements, that substantial amounts of freshly emitted NO are oxidized to NO2 during the
398
“tailpipe-to-road” stage. The subsequent modeling analysis indicates that chemical conversion is
399
rapid, and that NO-NO2-O3 chemistry significantly increases NO2/NOx ratios in the on-road
400
environment from the relatively low ratio at the tailpipe. The findings have raised the importance
401
of differentiating NO2/NOx ratios at various stages of exhaust plume evolution in order to
402
account for the contributions of primary emissions, on-road chemistry, near-road chemistry and
403
ambient background to near-road NO2 concentrations. We have shown that on-road chemistry is
404
a major contributor to curbside NO2, and likely near-road NO2. In general, RTP < ROR < RCS