Paper Partition Chromatographic Determination of Per Cent Solute

to the mark. Remove ... at different pH levels produced marked changes .... ¡taper. The compound was spotted 3 inches from the end of the paper strip...
2 downloads 0 Views 361KB Size
Dissolution of Elementa I Boron SIR: Eberle, Pinto, and Lerner ( I ) , recommend the use of large quantities of potassium persulfate for the dissolution by fusion of boron samples. It may be of interest to quote the experience a t the -4tomic Weapons Research Establishment in dealing with a variety of elemental boron samples, including amorphous powder, lightly sintered powder, fused lump and crystalline boron. One of the difficulties we experienced with fusion involving sodium carbonate, was the buffering effect of large amounts of dissolved salts, although this does not appear to apply to the persulfate fusion technique. We found that all types of elemental boron could be dissolved using the following technique. PROCEDURE

Accurately weigh 0.10-0.15 gram of the sample into a flat-bottomed glass capsule approximately 7 mm. in diameter X 1 cm. tall and drop the capsule and contents into a large Carius tube containing 4 ml. of concentrated nitric acid and 0.1 gram of potassium bromide. Allow any initial reaction to subside, cooling the bottom of the tube if necessary. When the initial reaction has ceased, seal off the Carius tube and heat for 2 to 3 hours in the Carius furnace, a t 250" C. Allow the furnace to cool and open the end of the tube, observing the usual precautions. Transfer the contents of the tube to a beaker.

rinsing the tube thoroughly and add the washings to the beaker. Remove any insoluble siliceous matter by filtering the solution into a 250-ml. volumetric flask and make the v o k m e up to the mark. Remove a 50-ml. aliquot for titration, add 0.5 gram of urea and heat on a water-bath for 5 minutes. Neutralize the solution by adding one or two pellets of sodium hydroxide and make just acid with dilute hydrochloric acid. Titrate by the mannitol procedure. RESULTS

Examples of the results are compared with those obtained by sodium carbonate fusion. Many elemental boron samples, particularly sintered, fused, and crystalline boron, do not dissolve completely on refluxing with nitric acid. The potassium bromide appears to speed up the dissolution of crybtalline boron, but it is not essential to add it. Both boron carbide and boron nitride dissolve using the Carius tube technique, and the method has been used by us for the analysis of a sample of boron nitride powder. Where the iron content of the sample is sufficiently high to cause serious errors, we have used a preliminary precipitation step in which excess barium carbonate was added prior to the filtration step. After acidifying. the solution was boiled to remove carbon dioxide.

Table I. comparison of Results Obtained by Carius Oxidation and Sodium Carbonate Fusion

Boron, qc Carius Sodium oxidation carbonate method fusion

-

Boron sample type and no. Amorphous A 87 7 B 87 1 C 88 0 Sintered A 89.0, 89.7 B 87.3,87.3 Crystalline A 68.5, 68.8 69.5

88 2 87.3 88 2

88.6, 90.0 86.5, 8 5 . 5 69.3, 6 9 . 5

LITERATURE CITED

(1) Eberle, A. R., Pinto, L. J., Lerner, M. W., ANAL.CHEM.36, 1282 (1964).

J. M. DOXALDSOX F. TROWELL Cnited Kingdom Atomic Energy -. huthority Atomic Weapons Research Establishment Aldermaston, Berkshire, England THEauthors thank the Director, Atomic Weapons Research Establishment, Aldermaston, Berkshire, England, for permission to publish this note.

Paper Partition Chromatographic Determination of Per Cent Solute Extracted into Organic Phase SIR: In the pharmaceutical industry it is often necessary to perform liquidliquid (aqueous-organic) extractions before the active compound in complex dosage form can be quantitatively determined. The optimization of the extraction conditions usually invoIx-es the determination of the pH profiles of the compound in several solvents. To do this by actual liquid-liquid extraction followed by quantitative chemical analysis of the two phases is not only tedious but requires large quantities of material, solvents, and glassware. There has been available in most laboratories for some time a technique well suited to this problem. I t is paper partition chromatography. The utility of the paper partition chromatographic method is based on the little appreciated fact ( 5 , 7 ) that the R/ value of a compound in paper partition chromatography is equal to 2202

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY

f , the fraction extracted into the mobile phase, or 100 X R, equals the per cent solute extracted into the organic phase, a term more familiar to analytical chemists doing liquid-liquid partition studies. Carless and Woodhead (3) introduced the concept of filter paper buffered a t different pH's in the development of chromatographs of alkaloids. Munier (8, 9) showed that paper partition chromatography carried out a t different pH levels produced marked changes in R, values of acidic and basic compounds. Goldbaum and Kazyak (6) reported a method for the identification of alkaloids and other basic drugs based on the pattern produced by the R, values a t four different pH's. Betina ( I , 2) used paper chromatography for the determination of suitable pH values for the extraction of acidic and basic antibiotics. Waksmundzki

and Soczewinski ( I 7-1 9) developed the formula describing the relationship between R, values of organic acids and bases and amphoteric compounds and their partition coefficients and ionization constants, the pH of the buffered paper, and the ratio of volumes of mobile and stationary phase. Debska (4) used llunier and Soczewinski's method to determine the dissociation constants of two alkaloids from R f measurements. Kaksmundzki (26, 19) and Soczeivinski (16, 16) used paper chromatography for the determination of suitable buffer systems for countercurrent distributions. Soczewinski (10-14) extended these studies to multicomponent t'wo-phase paper chromatographic syst'ems. The partition coefficient of the solute between the stationary (aqueous) and the mobile (organic) phase, CY, is related to f , the fraction of solute extracted

From Figure 1 which shows the relationship betrveen f , R,, and the constant K , it is evident that for

K = l

Rj=f

K > 1

Rf>f

K < 1

Rfh chromatogral)hy tanks had been equilibrated with the organic .;olvent and water Iirior to the development of the paper striils. ‘I’hc drve1ol)nient times were I .jto 2 h o u r s for chloroforni and n-heptane! and overnight for n-butanol. T h e ~ m p e r swerc then dried in a 40’ C. draft oven and examined under an ultraviolet lanil 1. A rornlmiwn bctwern the R, value for pal)er liartition (,hromatograj)hy and the per cent wlute estracnted into the organic phase by direct liquid-liquid

PH

Figure 4. Sulfadiazine com pound) System:

Chloroform-water Liquid-liquid

-0-0-0-

(amphoteric

extraction

(f

ordinate)

-A-A-Araphy

Paper partition chromatog-

(R, ordinate)

VOL. 36, NO. 1 1 , OCTOBER

1964

2203

LITERATURE CITED

(1) Betina,

V., Chem. Zvesti 15, 750 11961). (21 Betina, Sature 182, 796 (1958). (3) Carless, J. E., Woodhead, H. B., Ibid., 168, 203 (1951). (4) Ilebska, W., Ibid., 182, 666 (1958). (5) Giddings, J. C., Stewart, G. H., Ruoff, .4. L., J . Chromatog. 3, 239 (1960). (6) Goldbaum, L. R., Kazyak, L., ANAL. CHEM.28, 1289 (1956). ( 7 ) Laitinen, H. A , , "Chemical Analysis," p. 496, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960. \7.j

(8) Munier, R., Bull. Soc. Chim. France 19, 852 (1952). (9) Munier, R., hlacheboeuf, N . , Cherrier. N . . Bull. SOC. Chim. Riol. 34, 204 i1952). (10) Soczewinski, E., Bull. d c a d . Polon. Sei. Ser. Sci. Chim. 10, 635 (1962). (11) Ibid., 1 1 , 29 (1963). (12) Soczewinski, E., J . Chromatog. 8, 119 (1962). (13) Soczewinski, E., .Tatwe 191, 68 (1961). (14) Soczewinski, E., Wachtmeister, C. A , J . Chromatog. 7 , 311 (1962). (15) Soczewinski, E., Waksniundzki, E.,

Maciejewicz, al., BILZZ. Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Sei. Chini. 10, 125 (1962). (16) Kaksrnundzki, -I.,Soczewinski, E., Z b d . , 9. 155 (1961). (17) \?aksmundzki, '-4.> Soczewinski, E., J . Chrondoy. 3, 252 (10G0). (18) n'aksrnundzki, A,, Sorzewinski, E , , .\-ahre 184, 977 (1959), (19) \Vaksrnundzki, .I.,Swzeu-inski, E., Roczniki Cheni. 32, 863 (1958). P E T E R ICABASAK.4LIAS

Cheriiiral Researrh and Development Schering Corp. Bloomfield, S . J.

Determination of Polychloroprene Isomers by High Resolution Infrared Spectrometry SIR: The polymerization of 2-chloro1,3-butadiene ordinarily produces several isomeric structures in the polymer chain (2, 4). -in infrared method of analysis for the four isomers resulting from polymerization of chloroprene 1,4-trans- (I), 1,4-cis- (11), 1,2(III), and 3,4- (IV), based on calibration with model compounds, has been reported (4). .In improved infrared method of analysis for the major isomers I and I1 has now been developed. The improvements were obtained by calibration with polymers of known composition, by the use of a high resolution spectrophotometer, and by analysis of the data by a multiple regression computer method ( 3 ) .

0

.

O

C

'

'

I

_

'

-

CHC13

shown in Figure 1. The molar absorp-

EXPERIMENTAL

Apparatus. A Perkin-Elmer Model 221 prism-grating spectrophotometer was employed, with a programmed slit giving an effective spectral slit width of 1.4 em.-' a t the analytical frequencies. The instrument was purged with dry nitrogen. A Bendix G-15D digital computer was used for the multiple regression band fitting. Sample Preparation. T h e cis-polychloroprene standard was prepared b j a stereospecific route: polymerization of 2-(tri-n-butyltin)-l,3-butadiene, followed by chlorinolysis to replace the butyltin groups with chlorine (I). The trans-polychloroprene was prepared by free-radical emulsion polymerization a t -30" C. The polymers were purified by precipitation from benzene solution with methanol, followed by vacuum drying to constant' weight. Procedure. The 1800- to 1610em.-' region of the spectrum was run on polymer solutions (0.1 gram per ml. in spectroquality CHCls) in a calibrated 0.2-mm. pathlen@h cell. h calibration spectrum of water vapor in a 7.5em. pathlength gas cell was superimposed on each recording. The absorbances were corrected by subtracting the base line absorbance a t 1800 ern.-' 2204

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY

DISCUSSION

Calibration. The compositions of the standard samples were estimated by employing characterist,ic bands in the full infrared spectrum (2). A cispolychloroprene band at' 1200 em.-' proved to be adequate for estimating low levels of the cis isomer (about 5%) in high trans-polychloroprene, although this band was not useful at higher cis concentrations because of a poorly defined base line. The 1,2- and 3)4isomers were determined by their charact,eristic 925 and 883 em.-' bands (4). The cis standard was >97yc polychloroprene by elemental analysis and contained 1.0% of 15', but no detectable I or 111. The trans standard contained 95.4y0 of I, 3.8y0 of 11, 0.3y0 of 111,and 0.5% of IC. The C=C

where LA,, &, and Ai,are the absorbances of the unknown sample, the cis standard, and the trans standard, respectively, at the ith frequency; 2 , and yt are the cis and trans isomer concentrations in the unknown; and E , is the error. The absorbances were measured at l-cm.-I intervals from 1636 to 1680 em.-' (45 data points) and converted to constant solution concentration and pathlength. (The absorbance data for the standards was also corrected for the known compositions.) The resulting highly overdetermined system of linear simultaneous equations was solved by a least squares nicthod employing a multiple regression computer program which will be described elsewhere ( 3 ) . Typical analyses accounted for 97 to 1037, of the polymer present.