Pesticide Detox by Design - Journal of Agricultural and Food

Subscriber access provided by University of South Dakota

Perspective

Pesticide Detox by Design John E. Casida J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02449 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Aug 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 18, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 20

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

ABSTRACT: Detoxification (detox) plays a major role in pesticide action and resistance. The

2

mechanisms involved are sometimes part of the discovery and development process in seeking

3

new biochemical targets and metabolic pathways. Genetically- and chemical safener- modified

4

crops are a marked exception and often involve herbicide detox by design to achieve the required

5

crop tolerance. This perspective evaluates the role of detox by design or chance and target site-

6

based selectivity in insecticide, herbicide, and fungicide action and human health and

7

environmental effects.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


8

INTRODUCTION

9

Pesticide effectiveness and safety depend upon target site selectivity and detoxification (detox) at

10

the right time and place, a very large topic involving nearly a thousand pesticides1 acting by

11

around 100 mechanisms2 in a broad range of organisms. Pesticides are mostly detoxified by

12

oxidation, reduction, or hydrolysis (phase I metabolism) to give modified functional groups that

13

are conjugated for excretion or deposition (phase II metabolism) (Figure 1).3 Among the detox

14

enzymes are cytochrome P450s (CYPs) which add oxygen at sensitive sites, hydrolases which

15

cleave esters and epoxides, glutathione (GSH) S-transferases (GSTs) which catalyze GSH

16

addition to thiol-sensitive sites and various glucosyl- or glucuronosyltransferases which couple

17

hydroxyl and carboxyl groups with polar glucoside or glucuronide substituents.4, 5 The detox

18

enzymes recognize substrates to oxidize, reduce, hydrolyze, or conjugate independent of the

19

molecular features conferring toxicity. Four related topics are considered and illustrated with

20

well-studied examples. The first is detox-based selectivity and pest resistance for insecticides (1-

21

6), herbicides (7-10), and fungicides (11-14) (Table 1). The second is target site-based selectivity

22

and pest resistance which are major goals in pesticide design. The third is crop tolerance

23

involving expressed enzymes (15-18) or chemical safener-induced herbicide detox enzymes (20

24

for 19, 22 for 21 and 24 for 23), the only real detox by design (Table 2). The final topic relates

25

detox to humans and the environment considering pesticide mechanisms and chemotypes (Figure

26

2).

27

DETOX-BASED SELECTIVITY AND PEST RESISTANCE (Table 1)

28

Insecticides. Indoxacarb (1) is highly toxic to insects relative to mammals due to activation by an

29

insect carboxyamidase to the decarbomethoxylated oxadiazine acting as a voltage-dependent

30

blocker of insect Na+-dependent action potentials.6 Malathion (2)7 and tetramethrin (3)8


Page 2 of 20

Page 3 of 20


31

selectivity is attributable to their more rapid detox by hydrolysis in mammals than insects.

32

Acephate (4) is activated by carboxyamidase hydrolysis followed by sulfoxidation in insect pests

33

(house flies), whereas in mammals (mice) the deacetylated product (methamidaphos) inhibits the

34

deacetylase leading to detox favored over activation.9 Detox-based pest resistance involves

35

hydrolysis of dimethoate (5) in melon aphids10 and CYP6CMIvQ oxidation of imidacloprid (6)

36

to 5-hydroxy-6 in whiteflies.11 Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes can be monitored by a

37

microarray containing unique detox genes on “detox chips.”12 This ingenious approach is limited

38

by knowledge of the mechanisms for the hundreds of resistant insect-insecticide combinations.

39

Herbicides. Propanil (7) is less toxic to rice than to annual grasses and some broadleaf weeds

40

because the crop has a detoxifying aryl acylamidase which is very effective except following

41

organophosphate and methylcarbamate insecticide inhibition.13 Isoxaflutole (8) undergoes

42

isoxazole conversion to the phytotoxic diketonitrile derivative faster in weeds than in rice

43

resulting in activation selectivity.14 Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl (9) resistance in some populations of

44

black-grass results from enhanced metabolism.15 Chlorotoluron (10) resistance in annual

45

ryegrass involves N-methyl oxidation and then hydrolysis of the resulting urea.16

46

Fungicides. Dinobuton (11) is highly toxic to fungi due to hydrolase activation17 but less so to

47

mammals1 that detoxify by metabolism at other substituents. Triadimenol (12) undergoes

48

selective activation by oxidation to triadimefon in several species of fungi.18 Fungal resistance to

49

carbendazim (13) is usually due to selection for target site insensitivity but a 13 hydrolase is

50

described for Mycobacterium sp. SD-4.19 Fenhexamid (14) resistance in grey mold is based on

51

CYP684 oxidation.20

52

TARGET SITE-BASED SELECTIVITY AND PEST RESISTANCE



53

The goal of much of pesticide design is to achieve target site selectivity and avoid or circumvent

54

the development of resistant pests.

55

Insecticides. Most of the current insecticides have undergone pest selection for low sensitivity

56

leading to the continuing need for new target sites. Insect development is programmed by

57

juvenile hormones and differentiation hormones (ecdysones) with no counterpart in mammals.

58

Juvenoids and ecdysonoids provide excellent control of populations synchronized by

59

developmental stage but the damage resulting from their slow action is often unacceptable.

60

Inhibitors of chitin synthesis are ideal for selective toxicity but again are often unacceptably slow

61

in their action. Respiratory poisons such as rotenone have been used for over a century in pest

62

insect control but sometimes with selectivity problems. Nerve and muscle poisons are the major

63

insecticides working on the GABAergic, glutaminergic, cholinergic and Na+ channel systems or

64

the Ca++-activated Ca++ channel. Target site-based resistance involves mutations in the specific

65

binding sites (AChE, GABA-R, Glu-R, nAChR, and VGSC; see abbreviations) lowering

66

sensitivity to whole classes of insecticides21 or in the detox mechanisms. In each of these cases

67

some compounds have adequate insect/mammal target site selectivity while safety for others

68

comes from detox.

69

Herbicides. Many target sites important in plants are not represented in mammals and other

70

animals. The most obvious ones are photosynthesis and carotenoid, amino acid and phytosterol

71

biosynthesis in plants only. The pathways of sterol and cell wall synthesis differ in insects,

72

plants, and fungi providing important targets for selectivity. Inhibitors of photosystem II and of

73

acetohydroxyacid synthase (also named as acetolactate synthase) act only in plants. The most

74

important herbicide glyphosate (15) blocks 5-enolpyruvoylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP)

75

synthase (EPSPS) in plants with no equivalent site in mammals. Despite this target site


Page 4 of 20

Page 5 of 20


76

specificity glyphosate is still of concern as a purported human carcinogen and restricted or

77

banned in some countries.

78

Fungicides. Target site-based selectivity for fungicides involves sterol and chitin biosynthesis by

79

systems somewhat different than those of other organisms. The four fungicides used in by far the

80

largest amounts are sulfur, mancozeb, copper salts, and chlorothalonil, all thiol-reactive

81

categorized as multisite (multiple target site) in their action and less likely to undergo selection

82

for resistance than the specific site fungicides.21

83

CROP TOLERANCE BY DESIGN (Table 2)

84

Herbicides are intended to kill weeds without damaging crops. This requires crop/weed

85

selectivity in the target or in detox or a combination which serves as the basis for most

86

genetically-modified (GM) crops. The far most important example is glyphosate (15) tolerance

87

in corn, soybean, and some other crops conferred in part by glyphosate oxidase (GOX) but

88

mostly by overexpression of a GM-modified EPSPS target.22 These “Roundup Ready” GM crops

89

are accepted in the U.S., Canada, Brazil, and many other countries but not in Japan or Europe.

90

Glufosinate (16) tolerant crops express an N-acetyltransferase for detoxification.23 2,4-D (17)

91

tolerance comes from an aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase24,25 and dicamba (18) tolerance from an

92

expressed dicamba O-demethylase.26 Toxicological data on the GM herbicide-tolerant crops do

93

not reveal any significant toxicity problem so the issue becomes natural versus GM foods, which

94

continues as a heated debate. Crop tolerance without altered weed sensitivity can be achieved by

95

addition of herbicide safeners [dichlormid for EPTC (20 and 19),27 benoxacor for metolachlor

96

(22 and 21)28 and isoxadifen-ethyl for nicosulfuron (24 and 23)29] that induce herbicide-

97

detoxifying GSH synthesis and GST activity in corn, barley and a few other crops.27,28 Although

98

the induction mechanism and species selectivity are only partially understood for the chemical



99

safeners29, this is a more acceptable approach for some biologists than crop protection by

100

expression of foreign genes.

101

DETOX RELATIVE TO PEOPLE AND THE ENVIRONMENT

102

Maintaining a balance. We have learned to produce food for an expanding population and to live

103

with much reduced insect-transmitted malaria, yellow fever, and plague, and enjoy the associated

104

relief from hunger, disease and anxiety. Each decade starting in the mid-20th century brought

105

major changes in insecticides with the chlorinated hydrocarbons of the 1940s, the

106

organophosphates of the 1950s, the methylcarbamates of the 1960s, the pyrethroids of the 1970s,

107

the phenylpyrazoles of the 1980s, the neonicotinoids of the 1990s and the ryanodine receptor

108

activators (phthalic and anthranilic diamides) of the 2000s.30 Similar changes have occurred for

109

the herbicides and fungicides. Many pesticides were used for years then withdrawn as

110

unfavorable toxicology became apparent or safer and more effective replacements were found.

111

These superseded compounds are nearly equal in numbers to the currently used pesticides.1 DDT

112

taught us the lesson of too much pesticide is not a good thing. Four billion pounds, slow

113

breakdown and passage through food chains could not be tolerated. Pesticides must be regulated.

114

They must be assumed dangerous until proven otherwise. The pesticide era and the “Silent

115

Spring” of Rachel Carson31 opened our eyes to the need to maintain natural systems as sacred

116

rights for the future. Some organisms and ecosystems are at particular risk. The honeybee and

117

monarch butterfly are of major current concern. We seek a balance of nature that is sustainable

118

for people and much of the environment. With increasing numbers of people and fewer natural

119

areas a decision must be made on where to draw the line now and in the future.

120

Mechanisms and chemotypes. Target site resistance and pesticide replacements mean people will

121

inevitably be exposed to pesticides acting on new targets already well understood or potentially


Page 6 of 20

Page 7 of 20


122

poorly defined. The list of pesticide-selective targets has expanded little in recent years. New

123

genomic, proteomic, and other omic techniques reveal new candidate targets as do novel

124

biochemical mechanisms discovered in microorganisms, fruit flies, zebra fish and genetic

125

expression systems. The increased use of molecular modeling and precision of structural target

126

site structures open new vistas in substituent replacements. Biodegradability then becomes an

127

important consideration.

128

Detox by design (Figure 2). Detox by design can involve changing the chemical substituents of

129

the pesticide or changing the organism. The classical substituent changes alter the toxicity

130

(toxophore) or detoxification/activation (detoxophore). Further changes may attempt to

131

overcome resistance or confer safety for crops, people or the environment (selectophore). The

132

organism can be changed by formulation additives to improve the penetration, synergists to

133

increase the toxicity, or safeners to prevent the toxicity such as of herbicides to crops. The largest

134

change is to genetically modify the organism such as the crop by introducing a less sensitive

135

overexpressed target site alone or with a detox enzyme. Detox by design also applies to the

136

environment. Photodecomposition plays a major role in the fate of pesticides in the environment.

137

Pesticides binding in soils and contaminating water are often difficult to remove. Microbial detox

138

of polluted soils and water can supplement physical methods of removal but there are often a

139

series of metabolites in the process of mineralization. Some residues however have negligible

140

bioavailability. Challenges remain in finding suitable toxophores, detoxophores, and

141

selectophores so that the benefits of pest control can be more fully realized in a balance with

142

minimal

nontarget

toxicity

and

143


public

perception.


144

AUTHOR INFORMATION

145

Corresponding Author

146

*Phone: (510) 642-5424. E-mail:

147

[email protected].

148

ORCID

149

John E. Casida: 0000-0002- 3181-7561

150 151

NOTES

152

The author declares no competing financial interest.

153 154

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

155

I give special thanks to Thomas Zy Lin (B.A. 2019, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology,

156

University of California, Berkeley), for outstanding contributions in searching, compiling, and

157

presenting the information in this Perspective. This paper was accepted for publication after

158

Professor Casida passed away on June 30, 2018. Minor changes were made by associate editor

159

Qing X. Li before acceptance. Prof Casida was a preeminent toxicologist and pesticide expert.

160

His prominent publications in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry are

161

acknowledged.”


Page 8 of 20

Page 9 of 20


162

ABBREVIATIONS USEDa

163

AChE

acetylcholinesterase

164

CYPs

cytochrome P450s

165

EPSP

5-enolpyruvoylshikimate-3-phosphate

166

EPSPS

EPSP synthase

167

GABA

γ-aminobutyric acid

168

GABA-R

GABA receptor

169

Glu-R

glutamate receptor

170

GM

genetically modified

171

GOX

glyphosate oxidase

172

GSH

glutathione

173

GST

GSH S-transferase

174

nAChR

nicotine receptor

175

VGSC

voltage-gated Na+ channel

176 177

ADDITIONAL NOTES

178

a

179

relevant metabolism sites.

Compound numbers are given in Tables 1 and 2. Arrows on the chemical structures designate



Page 10 of 20

180

REFERENCES

181

(1) Turner, J.A. Ed. The Pesticide Manual: A World Compendium, 17th ed.; British Crop

182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190

Protection Council, Alton, UK, 2015; pp. 1440. (2) Casida, J.E. Pest toxicology: the primary mechanisms of pesticide action. Chem.

Res.

Toxicol. 2009, 22, 609-619. (3) Xu, C.; Li, C.Y.; Kong, A.N. Induction of phase I, II and III drug metabolism/transport by xenobiotics. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2005, 28, 249-268. (4) Hodgson, E., Metabolism of pesticides. pp. 893-922 in Hayes’ Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, 3rd ed.; Krieger, R., Ed., Elsevier, London, UK, 2010. (5) Van Eerd, L.L.; Hoagland, R.E.; Zablotowicz, R.M.; Hall, J.C. Pesticide metabolism in plants and microorganisms. Weed Sci. 2003, 51, 472-495.

191

(6) Wing, K.D.; Sacher, M.; Kaguya, Y.; Tsurubuchi, Y.; Mulderig, L.; Connair, M.; Schnee,

192

M.E. Bioactivation and mode of action of oxadiazine indoxacarb in insects. Crop Prot. 2000,

193

19, 537-545.

194 195 196 197

(7) Casida, J.E.; Baron, R.L.; Eto, M.; Engel, J.L. Potentiation and neurotoxicity induced by certain organophosphates. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1963, 12, 73-83. (8) Jao, L.T.; Casida, J.E. Insect pyrethroid-hydrolyzing esterases. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 1974, 4, 465-472.

198

(9) Mahajna, M.; Quistad, G.B.; Casida, J.E. Acephate insecticide toxicity: safety conferred by

199

inhibition of the bioactivating carboxyamidase by the metabolite methamidophos. Chem.

200

Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 64-69.


Page 11 of 20


201

(10) Lokeshwari, D.; Kumar, N.K.K.; Manjunatha, H.; Shivashankar, S. Biochemical

202

characterization of detoxifying enzymes in dimethoate-resistant strains of melon aphid, Aphis

203

gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Adv. Entomol. 2016, 4, 167-182.

204

(11) Karunker, I.; Morou, E.; Nikou, D.; Nauen, R.; Sertchook, R.; Stevenson, B.J.; Paine, M.J.;

205

Morin, S.; Vontas, J. Structural model and functional characterization of the Bemisia tabaci

206

CYP6MCM1vQ, a cytochrome P450 associated with high levels of imidacloprid resistance.

207

Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2009, 39, 697-706.

208

(12) David, J-P.; Strode, C.; Vontas, J.; Nikou, D.; Vaughan, A.; Pignatelli, P.M.; Louis, C.;

209

Hemingway, J.; Ranson, H. The Anopheles gambiae detoxification chip: A highly specific

210

microarray to study metabolic-based insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. Proc. Natl.

211

Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 4080-4084.

212

(13) Leah, J.M.; Caseley, J.C.; Riches, C.R.; Valverde, B. Association between elevated activity

213

of aryl acylamidase and propanil resistance in jungle-rice, Echinochloa colona. Pestic. Sci.

214

1994, 42, 281-289.

215

(14) Mougin, C.; Boyer, F.-D.; Caminade, E.; Rama, R. Cleavage of the diketonitrile derivative

216

of the herbicide isoxaflutole by extracellular fungal oxidases. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48,

217

4529-4534.

218

(15) Cocker, K.M.; Moss, S.R.; Coleman, J.O.D. Multiple mechanisms of resistance to

219

fenoxaprop-P-ethyl in United Kingdom and other European populations of herbicide-

220

resistant Alopecurus myosuroides (black-grass). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 1999, 65, 169-180.

221

(16) Burnet, M.W.M.; Loveys, B.R.; Holtum, J.A.M.; Powles, S.B. A mechanism of

222

chlorotoluron resistance in Lolium rigidum. Planta 1993, 190, 182-189.



223

(17)

Ilivicky,

J.;

Casida,

J.E.

Uncoupling

action

Page 12 of 20

of

2,4-dinitrophenols,

2-

224

trifluoromethylbenzimidazoles and certain other pesticide chemicals upon mitochondria from

225

different sources and its relation to toxicity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1969, 18, 1389-1401.

226

(18) Deas, A.H.B.; Carter, G.A.; Clark, T.; Clifford, D.R.; James, C.S. The enantiomeric

227

composition of triadimenol produced during metabolism of triadimefon by fungi. III.

228

Relationship with sensitivity to triadimefon. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 1986, 26, 10-21.

229

(19) Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Hu, B.; Zhang, C.; Jin, W.; Zhu, S.; Hu, G.; Hung, Q.

230

Identification of the key amino acid sites of the carbendazim hydrolase (Mhel) from a novel

231

carbendazim-degrading strain Mycobacterium sp. SD-4. J. Hazardous Materials 2017, 331,

232

55-62.

233

(20) Azeddine, S.; Billard, A.; Bach, J.; Lanen, C.; Walker, A.-S.; Debieu, D.; Helma, F.-D. S.

234

Botrytis pseudocinerea is resistant to the fungicide fenhexamid due to detoxification by the

235

cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP684. Proceedings of the 17th International

236

Reinhardsbrunn symposium on Modern Fungicides and Antifungal Compounds. Apr. 2013,

237

Friedrichroda, Germany, 2013.

238 239 240 241

(21) Casida, J.E.; Bryant, R.J. The ABCs of pesticide toxicology: amounts, biology, and chemistry. Toxicol. Res. 2017, 6, 755-763. (22) Pollegioni, L.; Schonbrunn, E.; Siehl, D. Molecular basis of glyphosate resistance- different approaches through protein engineering. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 2753-2766.

242

(23) Thompson, C.J.; Movva, N.R.; Tizard, R.; Crameri, R.; Davies, J.E.; Lauwereys, M.;

243

Botterman, J. Characterization of the herbicide-resistance gene bar from Streptomyces

244

hygroscopicus. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 2519-2523.


Page 13 of 20


245

(24). Wright, T.R.; Shan, G.; Walsh, T.A.; Lira, J.M.; Cui, C.; Song, P.; Zhuang, M.; Arnold,

246

N.L.; Lin, G.; Yau, K.; Russell, S.M.; Cicchillo, R.M.; Peterson, M.A.; Simpson, D.M.;

247

Zhou, N.; Ponsamuel, J.; Zhang, Z. Robust crop resistance to broadleaf and grass herbicides

248

provided by aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase transgenes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010,

249

107, 20240-20245.

250

(25) Zhou, X.; Rotondaro, S.L.; Ma, M.; Rosser, S.W.; Olberding, E.L.; Wendelburg, B.M.;

251

Adelfinskaya, Y.A.; Balcer, J.L.; Blewett, T.C.; Clements, B. Metabolism and residues of

252

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in DAS-40278-9 maize (Zea mays) transformed with

253

aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase-1 gene. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 7438-7444.(26)

254

Herman, P.L.; Behrens, M.; Chakraborty, S.; Chrastil, B.M.; Barycki, J.; Weeks, D.P. A

255

three-component dicamba O-demethylase from Pseudomonas maltophilia, strain DI-6: gene

256

isolation, characterization, and heterologous expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 24759-

257

24767.

258 259 260 261 262 263

(27) Hatzios, K.K.; Burgos, N. Metabolism-based herbicide resistance: regulation by safeners. Weed Sci. 2004, 52, 454-467. (28) Cottingham, C.K.; Hatzios, K.K. Influence of the safener benoxacor on the metabolism of metolachlor in corn. Z. Naturforsch. 1991, 46c, 846-849. (29) Sun, L.; Wu, R.; Su, W.; Gao, Z.; Lu, C. Herbicide safeners increase waxy maize tolerance to nicosulfuron and affect weed control. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. A 2016, 6, 386-393.

264

(30) Casida, J.E. Golden age of RyR and GABA-R diamide and isoxazoline insecticides:

265

common genesis, serendipity, surprises, selectivity, and safety. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2015, 28,

266

560-566.

267

(31) Carson, R. Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Co., New York, 1962; pp. 368.

268



269

Figure Legends

270

Figure 1. Pesticide detox reactions. Other phase I reactions are hydration and dehalogenation.

271

Other phase II reactions are acetylation, methylation and conjugation with glucose and amino

272

acids.

273 274

Figure 2. Detox by design. Major parameters of pesticide mechanisms and chemotypes are considered in a detox by design process.

275


Page 14 of 20

Page 15 of 20


TOC Graphic



Figure 1. Pesticide detox reactions. Other phase I reactions are hydration and dehalogenation. Other phase II reactions are acetylation, methylation and conjugation with glucose and amino acids.

Figure 2. Detox by design. Major parameters of pesticide mechanisms and chemotypes are considered in a detox by design process.


Page 16 of 20

Page 17 of 20


Table 1. Pesticide detox-based selectivity and pest resistance

Note: Arrows on the chemical structures designate relevant metabolism sites.



Table 2. Corn Herbicide Tolerance Induced by GM and Chemical Detox Safeners

Note: Arrows on the chemical structures designate relevant metabolism sites.


Page 18 of 20

Page 19 of 20


Table of Contents Graphic/Art 81x53mm (300 x 300 DPI)


Pesticide Detox by Design - Journal of Agricultural and Food

Recommend Documents