Phosphate-Exchanged Mg–Al Layered Double Hydroxides: A New

Jun 9, 2016 - Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Division of Soil and Water Management, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20, B-3001 Heverle...
0 downloads 13 Views 740KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY

Article

Phosphate exchanged Mg-Al Layered Double Hydroxides: a new slow release phosphate fertiliser Maarten Everaert, Ruben Warrinnier, Stijn Baken, Jon Petter Gustafsson, Dirk E. De Vos, and Erik Smolders ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/ acssuschemeng.6b00778 • Publication Date (Web): 09 Jun 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 14, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Phosphate exchanged Mg-Al Layered Double Hydroxides: a new slow release phosphate fertiliser Maarten Everaerta, Ruben Warrinniera, Stijn Bakena, Jon-Petter Gustafssonb, Dirk De Vosc, Erik Smoldersa a

Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Division of Soil and Water Management, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium b

Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7014, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden

c

Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, Centre for Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F – 02461, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium. Maarten Everaert (KU Leuven) Kasteelpark Arenberg 20 - bus 2459, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium. [email protected]

Tel: +32 16 37 91 16

Ruben Warrinnier (KU Leuven) Kasteelpark Arenberg 20 - bus 2459, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium. [email protected]

Tel: +32 16 37 70 33

Stijn Baken (KU Leuven) Present address: European Copper Institute, Avenue de Tervueren 168 b-10, 1150 Brussels, Belgium. [email protected]

Tel: +32 2 777 70 70

Jon Petter Gustafsson (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) Box 7014, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. [email protected]

Tel: +46 18 67 12 84

Dirk De Vos (KU Leuven) Celestijnenlaan 200F – 02461, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium. [email protected]

Tel: +32 16 32 16 39

Erik Smolders (KU Leuven) Kasteelpark Arenberg 20 - bus 2459, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium. [email protected]

Tel: +32 16 32 96 77

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Abstract The global phosphorus crisis provided impetus to develop fertilisers with better P use efficiency. We tested layered double hydroxides (LDHs) as slow release fertilisers with superior performance to fertilise strongly P fixing soils. Mg-Al LDHs with varying M2+/M3+ ratios were synthesised as NO3- forms and were exchanged with HPO42-. XRD and XANES spectroscopy confirmed the identity of the phosphate exchanged LDH. Decreasing the M2+/M3+ ratio, i.e. increasing the anion exchange capacity, increased the selectivity of P adsorption due to the increasing charge density of the LDH layers. The fertilisation efficiency of phosphate exchanged LDH (Mg/Al ratio of 2) was compared to that of a soluble P fertiliser in two P deficient soils, an acid weathered and a calcareous soil. The P-use efficiency of PLDH in the acid soil was up to 4.5 times higher than that of soluble P. This was likely related to a liming effect of the LDH. In the calcareous soil, the P-use efficiency at low doses was only 20 % above that of soluble P, whereas it was lower at high doses. These overall encouraging results warrant further studies on the boundary conditions under which P-LDHs may outperform traditional fertilisers. Keywords Layered double hydroxide (LDH), ion exchange, slow release fertiliser, phosphorus use efficiency, x-ray diffraction (XRD), x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES)

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 29

Page 3 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Introduction The global phosphorus crisis in recent years renewed attention to develop phosphate fertilisers with better phosphate use efficiency.1 Phosphorus (P) is an essential plant nutrient, but plant available P is only present at very low concentrations in the soil solution due to strong sorption or precipitation of the PO4 anions.2 In acid weathered soils, strong and largely irreversible P fixation on (oxy)hydroxides of Fe and Al occurs, whereas in calcareous soils P reacts with Ca2+ or Fe3+ to form poorly soluble precipitates.3,4 Current commercial phosphate fertilisers such as diammonium hydrogenphosphate (DAP) and triple superphosphate (TSP) are known to have a high water solubility. In P deficient weathered or calcareous soils, the PO4 anions readily react after amendment and, as a result, the P use efficiency and residual values of these P fertilisers are low. A slow release of P from the fertiliser pellet may overcome this issue by gradually supplying PO4 anions in the rhizosphere, thereby limiting fixation into soils. Slow release mineral P fertilisers used in modern agriculture can be divided into poorly soluble P forms and polymer coated soluble P forms. Struvite, a P recovery product from waste water, is gaining interest as a poorly soluble P slow release fertiliser.5 In most cases, struvite has been found to be equally efficient for P fertilisation as soluble P forms6–8. However, if slightly higher yields are obtained with struvite, this could not yet be linked to slow P release characteristics of the material.9 Also for party-acidulated phosphate rock a slow P release is observed due to a low solubility, which depends on the degree of acidulation10, on the primary source of the phosphate rock11 and on the soil conditions12. Polymer coated soluble P fertilisers perform less in the early plant growth stages in comparison with the non-coated alternative, while the opposite is true for the later final stages, resulting in an overall higher yield and P-uptake.13 In practice, mainly multi-nutrient formulations (e.g. NPK) are used in coated fertilisers.14,15

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Several material classes that might have the desired characteristics to perform a slow release of P have already been explored, such as superabsorbent polymers, surfactant-modified zeolites, and polymeric anion exchangers.16–18 However, clear evidence for superior nutrient efficiency has not yet been found. Recently, layered double hydroxides (LDHs) have been proposed as phosphate adsorbents for the selective recovery of P from waste streams and these materials may also act as slow release P fertilisers. The LDHs are inorganic anion exchangers, often consisting of layered hydroxides of divalent (M2+) and trivalent (M3+) cations. They are commonly represented by the general formula [M2+1-x M3+x (OH)2]x+ [Amx/m].nH2O,

with x equal to M3+/(M2+ + M3+), and Am- the intercalated anion. Until now, the

use of LDHs mainly focused on P recovery from waste streams, followed by a desorption of P from the materials rather than on its use as fertiliser. Promising results are obtained for P uptake with Mg-Al19–22, Mg-Fe23,24 and Zn-Al25,26 LDHs from both synthetic solutions and waste water. Also Ca containing materials with good P removal properties are reported, but their precipitation based P interaction is a major disadvantage for P recovery.27,28 Overall, calcination of as synthesised LDHs25,29, as well as the introduction of quaternary cations (e.g. Zr4+) in the material30, improve the P uptake properties of LDHs. The feasibility of state of the art P desorption and LDH regeneration is, however, arguable. Highly saline or alkaline desorption solutions (up to 2 M NaCl30, or 1 M NaOH31) are required to replace the intercalated HPO42- anions by Cl- or OH- anions, which have a lower affinity for the LDH than HPO42-.20 This would lead to large saline or caustic waste streams. Alternatively, the HPO42- anions can be effectively exchanged in a CO32- solution31, given that CO32- has an even higher affinity for the LDH than HPO42-, but this methodology would require material calcination to regenerate the LDH, which is energy intensive. A successful attempt has been made to obtain a P desorption at lower NaCl-NaOH concentrations using anionic surfactants, although a large scale application remains doubtful.32 Clearly, the current practices to recycle

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 29

Page 5 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

P-LDHs have major drawbacks, and there is a need for new ways to efficiently use the PLDHs. The P-LDHs might be used directly as slow and controlled release P fertilisers in soils. The LDHs are able to slowly release intercalated anions, as proven in many other applications.33,34 However, fertilisation efficiency of P-LDHs has not yet been investigated. In pH neutral soils, a slow release of P from LDHs may be obtained by the ion exchange reaction between intercalated HPO42 -and HCO3- or CO32- anions from the soil solution. In an acid weathered soil, this ion exchange could be accompanied with P release caused by LDH dissolution.35,36 In addition to these slow release mechanisms, the LDHs may release P in response to specific signals from the plant roots, which we term controlled release. This additional P release from LDHs may be triggered by rhizosphere conditions and by plant strategies to overcome P deficiency, such as acidification, excretion of organic anions, and a higher carbonate concentration around the respiring roots. Therefore, P release from LDHs may be spatiotemporally controlled: P release is not only slow, as is the case for common slow release fertilisers, but it may also be localised near the plant roots. The development of an LDH fertiliser material may allow to bridge the gap between the recycling of P from waste streams and P fertilisation in problematic soils. Against this background, this study was set up to develop a synthesis and exchange protocol for P exchanged LDHs, and test their fertiliser value. The Mg2+ and Al3+ were selected as metal cations for the LDH fertiliser since it is not harmful to soil organisms, including plants. After P desorption, the residual phase is hydrotalcite (Mg6Al2(OH)16CO3.4H2O), a naturally occurring mineral in certain alkaline soils.37 If long-term LDH addition would result in partial dissolution of the material, e.g. in more acid soils, Mg2+ and Al3+ release will be harmless in terms of plant toxicity in a well-managed agricultural soil (liming, soil pH > 5). Magnesium is a macronutrient for plants38, so this can potentially even have beneficial effect on the plant 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

growth if well-balanced amounts of available Mg and Ca are maintained.39 Aluminium is not a plant nutrient, but released Al3+ will result in the formation of amorphous Al(OH)3, thereby assuring a very low Al3+ availability and absence of Al toxicity.40 The risk of environmental pollution with possible adverse effects on plant growth excludes the use of Ni or Zn containing LDHs for a fertiliser application.41,42 In this study, different Mg-Al LDH materials with varying anion exchange capacity (AEC) are synthesised and characterised by XRD, XANES, SEM and ICP. The uptake of P and the P release kinetics of these materials are quantified. Finally the P fertilisation efficiency of a P-LDH is compared to that of a soluble P fertiliser in a pot trial. Experimental LDH synthesis and characterisation Nitrate forms of Mg-Al LDHs were synthesised by coprecipitation using mixed solutions of Mg(NO3)2.6H2O and Al(NO3)3.9H2O with 3 M total metal concentration.43 Solutions with Mg/Al ratios of 2, 3 and 4 were used to obtain three LDH materials with a different AEC: every Al3+ cation in the mineral lattice gives rise to a positive charge which contributes to the AEC. 50 mL of the metal solutions were added at a rate of 10 mL/h to 400 mL of a 0.01 M NaOH solution at pH 12 under vigorous stirring using a B. Braun Perfusor pump. The pH was maintained at 12 ± 0.2 by adding 3 M NaOH using a Metrohm Titrino 702. The synthesis was performed at room temperature, and in a nitrogen atmosphere to prevent the formation of carbonate in solution. Afterwards, the material was ripened in the synthesis mixture for 0.5 h, and recovered by centrifugation (20 minutes, 15000 g). The materials were washed 3 times with mQ water and subsequently dried at 80°C. The chemical composition of the as-synthesised LDHs was determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; Perkin Elmer Optima 3300 DV)

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 29

Page 7 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

after dissolution in HNO3. Crystallographic and morphological characteristics of the assynthesised and P exchanged LDHs were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The SEM micrographs were obtained using a PHILIPS XL 30 FG microscope on Au-coated samples. Powder XRD analysis was performed with a STOE STADI P Combi instrument in the Debye-Scherrer geometry (Cu Kα1) using an image plate detector (2θ = 0-62°; ∆2θ = 0.03°). The AEC of the materials was calculated from the Mg/Al ratio, assuming dehydrated materials; the charge density of the hydroxide layers (Cd, in e/nm2) using following formula:44 ‫ܥ‬ௗ = ‫݁ݔ‬/(ܽଶ sin 60°) with a = 2d011 = 0.309 nm, x= M3+/(M2+ + M3+), and e the elementary charge. Phosphate uptake by LDHs

The uptake of phosphate by the synthesised LDHs was determined by equilibrating the LDHs in duplicate with solutions containing different concentrations of KH2PO4. The amount of P added to the solution was calculated as a percentage of the theoretical AEC of the materials assuming adsorption of the divalent HPO42- and ranges between 0 and 250 % of the AEC. The pH of the KH2PO4 solutions was adjusted to 7.2 with a dilute NaOH solution before LDH addition. The suspensions were shaken end-over-end for 24 h, centrifuged (3000 g, 20 minutes), and the concentrations of P, Mg, and Al in the supernatants were determined by ICP-OES. The recovered LDH material was characterised using XRD. Mg/Al (2/1) material treated in 10 %, 70 % and 250 % P solutions were analysed using P K-edge XANES spectroscopy on beamline BL-8 of the Synchrotron Light Research Institute, Thailand.45 The XANES data processing was performed by means of the Athena program in the Demeter Software Package (v 0.9.24).46 By means of a linear combination fitting (LCF) approach a set

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

of spectra of known standards (variscite, amorphous aluminium phosphate and struvite; more in SI) were combined and fitted to the sample spectra.47 Phosphate release kinetics from P-LDHs The release kinetics of PO4 were determined in a zero sink system at pH=8.3 in 2 mM NaHCO3. These conditions mimic those in the rhizosphere of a calcareous soil: a total dissolved HCO3- concentration around 2 mM and a constant withdrawal of P from soil solution by plant roots. First, P-LDHs were prepared at pH 7.2 by equilibrating the synthesised LDH materials for 24 h with a solution containing an amount of phosphate (added as KH2PO4) equal to 200 % of the theoretical AEC of the LDH. Afterwards, the suspensions were centrifuged, and the obtained P-LDHs washed with mQ water and dried at 60°C. The P release kinetics from the P-LDHs and from two soluble P fertilisers (KH2PO4 and granular triple super phosphate) were determined by equilibrating them with anion exchange membranes (AEMs) as infinite P sink. These AEMs (BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, England, anion exchange capacity: 0.037 meq cm-2) have previously been used to determine plant available P.4 Before the experiment, the membranes were preconditioned in 0.5 M NaHCO3 in order to saturate the binding sites with carbonate. During equilibration, dialysis membranes (Spectra/Por® 4, regenerated cellulose, MWCO 12-14 kD, diameter 16 mm) were used to physically separate the fertiliser material from the infinite sink. The internal solution contained either 10 mg of the P-LDH, 3 mg of KH2PO4, or 3 mg of industrial triple super phosphate (TSP, 18.3 wt% P) in 2 mM NaHCO3 at pH 8.3. The external solution contained two 6 cm2 AEM strips suspended in 35 mL of 2 mM NaHCO3 at pH 8.3. the ratio of the AEM binding capacity to the HPO42- initially present in the inner compartment, was always larger than 30. For every P material 3 replicates were used. These suspensions were

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 29

Page 9 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

shaken end-over-end for 1600 h, and the P release from the fertilisers was monitored by recovering the AEMs from the external compartment at selected moments and by replacing them with fresh AEMs. The recovered AEMs were shaken in 0.5 M HCl for 24 h to desorb the membrane bound P, and the P in these solutions was measured by ICP-OES. Pot trial

The P fertilisation efficiency of phosphate exchanged Mg-Al (2/1) LDH was determined and compared with that of KH2PO4 by growing barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in two P deficient soil samples collected from the surface horizon of a Ferrasol (Kuinet, Kenia; pH 4.3) and a Calcic Cambisol (Guadelajara, Spain; pH 7.0) (soil characteristics in Table 1). Apart from these two soils, an additional treatment was prepared by mixing the Kuinet soil with 1wt% of powdery gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O) to identify the effect of neutral cations (Mg2+ or Ca2+) on the minimization of Al3+ toxicity. Gypsum is commonly used in weathered soils to control subsurface acidity and improve soil structure.48,49 The soils were amended with P doses of 0, 10, 30, 100 and 300 mg P/kg soil, either as powdered P-LDH (2/1) material (mortar grinded) or as dissolved KH2PO4. The K concentrations in all treatments were adjusted to 100 mg K (kg soil)-1 by adding dissolved KCl. The soils were also amended with 100 mg N (kg soil)-1 and 10 mg Mg (kg soil)-1 using Ca(NO3)2 and Mg(NO3)26H2O. For every treatment 3 replicate pots were prepared. After addition of the nutrients, the soils were subjected to 4 drying/rewetting cycles to increase P fixation and simulate conditions in the field. One cycle consisted of air drying (24 h) at 25°C, followed by rewetting the soils with deionised water to 80 % of their moisture content at field capacity (pF 2). After the last rewetting phase, the soils were incubated for 5 days at 20°C in darkness. The soils were transferred into pots, and five pre-germinated barley seedlings were planted in every pot, 0.5-1 cm beneath the soil surface. The pots were installed in a growth chamber with a day/night regime of 16 h light (20°C) and 8 h darkness (16°C), a light intensity of 650 mole photons m-2 s-1 during the day 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 29

and a relative humidity of 75 %. Water losses were corrected daily using deionised water. The soil surface was covered by polyethylene beads to reduce evaporation losses. After 4 days, the number of plants per pot was reduced to three by removing the smallest plants in each pot. After 17 days, the shoots were harvested, dried at 60°C for 48 h, and their weights determined. Their elemental composition was determined by ICP-OES after digestion in boiling HNO3 in a hot block. Statistical analysis of the results was performed in JMP Pro 11 (SAS®). Table 1 Selected properties of soils. Soil location

Soil typea

Sandb

Siltb

Clayb

pHc

eCECd

Oxalate extractione

Al

(%)

(%)

(%)

(cmolc kg-1)

Fe

P

(mg kg-1)

Kuinet, Kenia

Ferrasol

16

6

78

4.2

8.9

700

2100

126

Guadalajara, Spain

Calcic Cambisol

44

31

25

7.0

14.1

440

160

120

a

Major FAO soil grouping50;

b

Particle size analysis by pipette method51;

c

pH (1:5)

determined in 0.01 M CaCl2; d eCEC (effective CEC) determined at soil pH by silver thiourea method52; e Ammonium oxalate-extractable Al, Fe and P53.

Results and discussion Physical and chemical properties of the LDHs Elemental analysis of the LDHs shows that their M2+/M3+ ratios slightly deviate from those in the synthesis solution, with a general tendency of lower Mg incorporation as the Mg/Al ratio in the synthesis increases (Table 2). The XRD patterns of the as-synthesised LDH materials correspond to the expected structural characteristics of layered double hydroxides (Figure 1): 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

sharp and symmetric reflections for the (003) and (006) crystal planes, and broader and asymmetric reflections for the (015) and (018) planes. The observed (003) d-spacings of the as-synthesised LDHs are almost equal, suggesting a similar orientation of interlayer nitrate anions in all materials. Given the constant layer thickness of 4.8 Å54, the comparison of these (003) d-spacings to the geometry of the nitrate anion (approximated as a cylinder with radius 2.77 Å and height 2.76 Å; details: SI, section 4) shows that nitrate does not have to be oriented parallel to the layer, but can be tilted up to approximately 58-60° in the interlayer space in all three LDH materials. This orientation would allow a more efficient compensation of the charges of the layer. The small decrease of about 0.1 Å in (003) d-spacing with decreasing Mg/Al ratio (increasing AEC) of the as-synthesised materials is attributed to the shortening of the hydrogen bonds.55 This contrasts with earlier work: it has been reported that the basal spacing of nitrate exchanged LDHs increases with decreasing Mg/Al ratio which was explained by a shift to a more vertical orientation of the interlayer nitrate anions in materials with higher AEC.36 Table 2 Material characteristics of the three LDHs.

Molar Mg/Al ratio in

Molar Mg/Al ratio in

synthesis solution

LDH materials

(-)

Mg-Al (2/1)

LDH material

Calculated AEC

Charge density

(-)

(meq g-1)

(e nm-2)

2/1

1.95

4.2

4.1

Mg-Al (3/1)

3/1

2.74

3.5

3.3

Mg-Al (4/1)

4/1

3.64

3.0

2.7

11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 1 Right: XRD patterns of the LDH materials obtained after treatment in exchange solutions containing 250 % P of the AEC of the specific LDH, compared to the patterns of the as-synthesised materials; Left: graphic presentation of the intercalated anions and their effect on the basal spacings (given in Å). The SEM micrographs show a crystal size of around 20 nm in all as-synthesised LDHs (Figure S1, left), which is similar to a previously reported value.56 Due to the small crystal size, the typical hexagonal crystal morphology of LDHs is not readily recognised with SEM. With decreasing Mg/Al ratio of the materials, the XRD reflections are less intense and broader, which hints at lower crystallinity or smaller sizes of the crystalline domains (Figure 1). Wang et al. postulate two effects influencing the crystallinity of LDHs.57 On one hand, stability increases with decreasing Mg/Al ratio because the increased positive charge leads to stronger bonding between the hydroxide layers and interlayer anions. On the other hand, increased Al3+ substitution for Mg2+ introduces additional strain in the lattice. Since crystallinity decreases here with decreasing Mg/Al ratio of the material, the latter cation size effect outweighs the former effect in the net effect on the crystallinity. Phosphate uptake by LDHs

12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 29

Page 13 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

The exchange isotherms reveal higher uptake of P, expressed relative to the AEC, for LDHs with increasing AEC, i.e. with lower Mg/Al ratio. This means that a larger AEC increases the selectivity for HPO42- over NO3- (Figure 2). The difference in P uptake can be attributed to both the charge density of the LDH layers (Table 2) and that of the nitrate and phosphate anions. The cross section charge density of the phosphate anion is approximately -7.5 e nm-2, whereas that of the nitrate anion is between -4.1 and -6.5 e nm-2, depending on its orientation (details: SI, section 5). In the LDHs with high charge density (the 2/1 and 3/1 Mg-Al LDHs), the higher charge density of phosphate compared to nitrate favours the intercalation of phosphate by minimizing the energy of the system: the positive charge in the layers is better compensated, and the entropy of the system is maximised by releasing two nitrates into solution for every phosphate sorbed. In contrast, for the Mg-Al (4/1) LDH with the lowest charge density, nitrate is energetically favoured since a too high anion charge density would cause electrostatic repulsion due to a local excess of negative charge. This explains the relatively low selectivity for phosphate of the Mg-Al (4/1) LDH.

Figure 2 P exchange isotherms for the Mg-Al (2/1) (diamonds), Mg-Al (3/1) (squares) and the Mg-Al (4/1) (triangles) materials. The (003) reflections in the XRD patterns of the LDHs provide information about the nature and orientation of the anions in the interlayer gallery. To this end, the XRD patterns of the as13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

synthesised LDH materials are compared with those of LDHs equilibrated with exchange solutions containing 250 % of their AEC as phosphate (Figure 1). Given the constant layer thickness of 4.8 Å, the effect of phosphate binding on the interlayer spacing can be determined from the basal spacing. In the XRD pattern of the P exchanged Mg-Al (2/1) LDH, a shift of the (003) reflection to lower 2θ values is observed upon exchange. This is attributed to intercalation of phosphate, which replaces the smaller nitrate anion and therefore leads to a larger basal and interlayer spacing. The theoretical interlayer spacing of a phosphate intercalated LDH can be determined from the size of the phosphate tetrahedron. The phosphate tetrahedron has two different stable orientations in the interlayer of an LDH: either face sharing with one hydroxide layer and corner sharing with the other, or edge sharing with both hydroxide layers (Figure S2). Assuming a P-O bond length of 1.53 Å, an ionic radius of the O2- ion of 1.38 Å, and an O-P-O bond angle of 109° 58, geometrical calculations show that the interlayer spacing of P-LDH may range between 3.38 and 3.86 Å. The observed interlayer spacing of 3.59 Å (8.39 Å basal spacing minus 4.8 Å hydroxide layer spacing) falls perfectly in this range. The (003) reflection of the nitrate intercalated LDH, observed in the assynthesised Mg-Al (2/1) LDH, disappears completely after equilibration of this material with excess phosphate, showing nitrate is completely replaced by phosphate in the interlayer gallery. This explains why phosphate can occupy most of the AEC of this LDH (Figure 2). In contrast to the observations with Mg-Al (2/1) LDH, the (003) reflection of the assynthesised Mg-Al (4/1) LDH hardly shifts after equilibration with phosphate. A basal spacing below 8 Å is maintained, resulting in an interlayer spacing of 3.18 Å. This is too small for the phosphate tetrahedron (Figure S2). Therefore, phosphate cannot be present in the interlayer of this LDH, and so the interlayer gallery will still be occupied by nitrate. The exchange isotherm has a very steep (selective) part followed by a very small increase in sorbed P (Figure 2). The phosphate removed from the exchange solutions (up to 46 % of the 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 29

Page 15 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

AEC) must, therefore, be bound to the outer surfaces of the LDH particles. The positive charge density on the crystal edges of an LDH is much higher compared to that of the basal plane59, and, therefore, an edge sorption site can be treated as a point charge instead of a charged surface. Under such circumstances, size and orientation of competing anions are less important, and Coulomb’s law dictates the interaction of anions with the sorption sites. This results in a high selectivity for divalent HPO42- over monovalent NO3- for sorption at the outer surface of the LDHs, which explains the relative high P uptake by the Mg-Al (4/1) LDH in absence of P intercalation. The Mg-Al (3/1) LDH combines the P uptake mechanisms from both Mg-Al (2/1) and Mg-Al (4/1) materials. After equilibration with phosphate, the XRD pattern of the Mg-Al (3/1) material shows a double (003) and a double (006) reflection, highlighting the presence of two different anion species in the LDH interlayer, i.e. nitrate and phosphate. Deconvolution of this peak is difficult due to a large overlap. The maximum value of this (003) reflection at a 2θ value of 11.14° results in an interlayer spacing comparable to that of the as-synthesised material, and can be attributed to nitrate intercalation. To more accurately calculate the basal spacing corresponding to phosphate intercalation in this material, the smallest 2θ value of the splitted 006 reflection is used (21.61°). This approach yields a basal spacing of 3.38 Å, which is perfectly in agreement with the calculated basal spacing corresponding to one of two stable phosphate orientations in the LDH interlayer spacing (Figure S2). Material stability during the anion exchange reaction is crucial: dissolved metal species may interact with the free P to form insoluble precipitates such as AlPO4 and Mg3(PO4)2. These P forms are much less available for plant uptake compared to P bound through ion exchange, which would adversely affect the P fertilisation efficiency of the material. The stability of LDH material during equilibration with phosphate is supported by the preservation of the material crystallinity as evidenced by the XRD patterns, the absence of new XRD reflections 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

on the diffraction pattern of LDHs and absence of visual changes of the material on the SEM micrographs. Also from free Mg and Al concentrations in the exchange solutions after 24 h reaction (Figure S3) and the solution pH at that moment (Figure S4) a good LDH stability can be concluded, e.g. maximally 3 % of LDH-derived Mg is dissolved and this fraction is highest for the Mg-Al (4/1) LDH (details in the SI, section 2). Finally, the XANES spectra of the P exchanged Mg/Al (2/1) LDH material at different P loadings are mutually very similar, and display a clearly unique P bonding character that cannot be considered as mixtures of the reference materials (details in the SI, section 3). The most special feature of the P-LDH XANES spectra is a post-edge shoulder at 2158 eV, and a broad post-edge peak at 2170 eV (Figure S5). The feature at 2158 eV is very probably due to a Mg-PO4 interaction, since it is also, but more clearly, present in the spectrum of the Mg phosphate mineral struvite. A weak such feature can also be seen in the spectrum of newberyite, MgHPO4.3H2O.60 Whether this feature results from a minor amount of Mg3(PO4)2 or from electrostatically bound intercalated P is inconclusive. From comparison with the spectra of amorphous AlPO4 and variscite it can be concluded these phases are not major components in the P-LDH samples, as the K-edge energies of the former are ~0.5 eV higher, and as they have different post-edge features at 2161 and 2171.5 eV. Slow release of phosphate from P-LDHs A clear difference in P release is observed between the soluble and the slow release P fertilisers during equilibration with a zero sink for P (AEMs) in 2 mM HCO3- (Figure 3). The solid TSP and KH2PO4 particles dissolve quickly: within 24 h, nearly all added P is recovered by the AEMs, and no more P is detected in solution. The release of P by the LDHs is clearly slower compared to the soluble P forms, confirming that the P-LDH can act as a slow release compound. A kinetic desorption model (details in section 4 of the SI) shows a comparable P release for the different LDHs, with half-life of the P release ranging from 30 h for the Mg-Al 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 16 of 29

Page 17 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

(2/1) to 41 h for the Mg-Al LDH (3/1). After about 650 h, no detectable desorption of P from the LDHs is observed. Unlike for the soluble P fertilisers, not all P could be released from the LDH phase in this experimental set-up; up to 49 % of P for the (2/1), 53 % for the (3/1) and 75 % for the (4/1) LDH is not desorbed from the initial materials after 1600 h. This can be explained by the relatively low amount of divalent carbonate anion at pH 8.3, and the possible formation of insoluble P-precipitates such as Mg3(PO4)2 as mentioned above. The %P desorbed after 1600 h was distinctly larger for the (2/1) and (3/1) than for the (4/1) MgAl LDH. This is explained by the selectivity of the LDHs for carbonate over phosphate, which is, in turn, explained by the charge density of the LDHs and the anions. The high cross section charge density of carbonate (-8.37 to -13.52 e nm-2; details in section 3 of the SI) explains why more phosphate is released from P-LDHs with higher charge density. Despite the incomplete P release, the observed slow release is encouraging, and suggests that P-LDHs may have potential as slow release fertilisers. The phosphate exchanged Mg-Al 2/1 LDH is selected for use in the pot trial: of all LDHs tested, this material has the highest phosphate binding capacity and shows the highest quantity of P released per mass of LDH in the desorption test.

Figure 3 Semi-log plot of P release kinetics from soluble P fertilisers (KH2PO4 and TSP), and from slow release P fertilisers (P exchanged LDHs) upon reaction with an anion 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

exchange membrane acting as zero-sink. The vertical axis expresses the desorbed P as percentage of the total initial P. Pot trial The biomass yield and the total shoot P uptake increase with increasing P fertiliser dose in both soils (Figure S7 and Figure 4). With increasing KH2PO4 fertiliser dose, the shoot P concentrations increase from deficient values (830 mg P kg-1 for acid soil and 1000 mg P kg-1 for calcareous soil) to adequate values (>1600 mg P kg-1) illustrating that both soils are P deficient.61 In the acid soil, high doses of P-LDH significantly increase both shoot P concentrations and plant yield compared to the corresponding doses of dissolved KH2PO4 fertiliser. The shoot P uptake (mg P/pot) was 4.5-fold larger for the P-LDH than for the KH2PO4 at the intermediate dose of 100 mg P/kg soil. Surprisingly, if this soil is additionally amended with 1 wt% CaSO4, no significant differences in shoot yield or shoot-P between the LDH and KH2PO4 are observed. This indicates that the high yield in the P-LDH fertilised pots, compared to those amended with KH2PO4, is probably not largely due to a slow release effect of P. The soil pH of the acid Kuinet soil is low (Figure S8), indicating the possibility of manganese or aluminium toxicity in the plants.62 Plant analysis suggests Mn toxicity in the unamended acid soil, which is partly alleviated by KH2PO4 addition but strongly reduced by P-LDH addition. The Mn concentration of plants grown in the acid soil amended with low doses of KH2PO4 (0-30 mg P/kg soil) ranges between 1000 and 1500 mg Mn kg-1. This largely exceeds toxic thresholds for Mn in barley.63 In contrast, the plants grown in that soil amended with high doses of P-LDH only contain 45 mg Mn kg-1.. In plants grown in the Kuinet soil +1 wt% gypsum with KH2PO4, the shoot Mn content is reduced to 420 mg Mn kg-1. Most likely, a fraction of the alkaline LDH material added to the acid soil dissolves.35 Soil pH indeed increases with increasing P-LDH dose from 4.3 to 6.0 (Figure S8), thereby reducing Mn solubility and toxicity. Therefore, alleviation of toxicity of Mn (and likely Al) 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 29

Page 19 of 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

explains most of the added value of LDH over KH2PO4 in soils without gypsum application. In the gypsum treated soils, Mn toxicity is likely reduced by the dissolution of gypsum and the Ca2+-Mn2+ competition for root uptake64, and by the small but important increase in soil pH from 4.3 to 4.5 compared to the treatment without gypsum (Figure S8). The promising effects of P-LDHs in acid soils can be compared with that of reactive rock phosphates where dissolution is accompanied by alkalinisation.65

Figure 4 The total shoot P (mg P/pot, 3 seedlings/pot) plotted against the P fertiliser dose. The fertiliser was either dissolved KH2PO4 (diamonds) or a powdered P-LDH slow release fertiliser (spheres). The * indicates significant differences between both fertiliser forms (p