Photocatalytic Reduction of Fumarate to Succinate ... - ACS Publications

Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY

Article

Photocatalytic Reduction of Fumarate to Succinate on ZnS Mineral Surfaces Ruixin Zhou, and Marcelo I. Guzman J. Phys. Chem. C, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12380 • Publication Date (Web): 17 Mar 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 25, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

The Journal of Physical Chemistry

Photocatalytic Reduction of Fumarate to Succinate on ZnS Mineral Surfaces Ruixin Zhou and Marcelo I. Guzman* Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506

ABSTRACT

The reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle is an important central biosynthetic pathway that fixes CO2 into carboxylic acids. Among the five reductive steps in the rTCA cycle, the 2-electron reduction of fumarate to succinate proceeds nonenzymatically on the surface of photoexcited sphalerite (ZnS) colloids suspended in water. This model reaction is chosen to systematically study the surface photoprocess occurring on ZnS in the presence of [Na2S] (1-10 mM) hole scavenger at 15 °C. Experiments at variable pH (5-10) indicate that monodissociated fumaric acid is the primary electron acceptor forming the monoprotic form of succinic acid. The following reaction scheme is proposed: (1) Photoexcitation of ZnS generates conduction band electrons and valence band holes, (2) the hole scavenger donates electrons while producing sulfur-containing intermediates en route to sulfate formation, (3) a first electron transfer occurs at the conduction band converting chemisorbed monoprotic fumaric acid at surface zinc sites into an adsorb radical anion, (4) the radical anion accepts a second electron and forms an adsorbed

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 32

carbanion, which (5) abstracts two protons consecutively from either hydronium ion (acidic condition) or water (neutral and basic condition) to be desorbed as monodissociated succinic acid. The apparent quantum yield measurement of succinate production (Φs) under periodic irradiation at λ ≥ 305 nm shows that the timescale of electrons transfer on the conduction band (t1) and valance band hole loss (t2) are in the order of hundred microseconds and a few milliseconds, respectively. These transitions (t1 and t2) become undistinguishable at 520 µs for a zeta potential ζ = -22.09 mV corresponding to [Na2S] = 0.57 mM. Overall, this work provides new insights to model heterogeneous processes such as the reduction of CO2 occurring on the surface of photocatalysts and advance present understanding of photocatalytic reactions.

INTRODUCTION The photocatalytic harvesting of solar photons can potentially address the growing demand of energy supply faced worldwide.1 In this context, photocatalytic studies have largely focused their attention in producing renewable H2(g) from water splitting,2 while more recently the reduction of CO2 has regained attention as a possible mechanism to fix this atmospheric greenhouse gas and produce useful hydrocarbon fuels.3-5 In general, the reported difficulty for promoting the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 is the high initial energy cost of the one-electron reduction to produce CO2•−, which has a standard reduction potential E0 = −1.85 V at pH 75. Efforts to improve the low quantum yield of typical reductions have proposed to control the properties of photocatalysts to increase the number of photoexcited carriers on the surface where the reaction takes place.2 Surface modifications that activate the semiconductor also facilitate charge separation,2 suggesting the importance of measuring the lifetimes of surface excited


2

Page 3 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


states. Recently, various doping of nanostructures, combinations of semiconductors, and the addition of sensitizers were explored.5 However, a central physical chemistry concept that has been ignored5 until our previous publication3 is that the effective transfer of electrons to adsorbed substrates occurs in relatively slow timescales.3 In addition to the energy applications discussed above, prebiotic chemists have been interested in the use of photocataysis to drive a cycle of carbon fixation inspired in the reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle relevant to the origin of life.6-10 The origin of life is one of the most important unsolved questions of science,11 which combines several diverse disciplines, including physical chemistry. A further discussion to context of this research in the origin of life field is presented in the accompanying Supporting Information. Photocatalyzed reactions have been proposed as fundamental for the origin of life6-10, 12-14 by directly providing carboxylic acids to the rTCA cycle.7-10 The photoexcitation of mineral semiconductors by sunlight opens new reaction pathways through the generated excited-state species and radicals.10 For example, three out of five reductions from the rTCA cycle can be driven by photocatalysis on the surface of ZnS colloids suspended in water using Na2S hole scavenger.7,

10

The stoichiometric yields of the

conversion from oxaloacetate to malate, fumarate to succinate, and 2-oxoglutarate to oxalosuccinate were 75, 95, and 2.5 %, respectively.10 The low yield for the reductive carboxylation of 2-oxoglutarate to oxalosuccinic acid, its consecutive reduction to form cisaconitic acid, as well as the reductive carboxylation of succinic acid to 2-oxoglutaric acid have been difficult to achieve.10 Furthermore, the actual photocatalytic mechanism of the working reductive steps has remained unexplored.6 The focus of this study on ZnS factors in that the photocatalyst was indicated as an excellent mineral present in Hadean environments due to its stability with respect to ZnCO3.10, 14 The


3


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 32

conduction-band electrons of the semiconductor have a sufficiently negative reduction potential (−1.04 V versus NHE) to drive all the reductions steps in the rTCA cycle.10, 14 Moreover, ZnS can harvest energy from sun’s photons to promote the reaction under study, which is slow by thermal chemistry alone.10, 14 In our previous work, the reduction of CO2 to formate (HCOO-) was reported in great detail using illuminated aqueous suspensions of ZnS semiconductor as the catalysts.3 The work developed new methods to study photoreductions reactions,3 and pointed out that to enable any progress in this field, further understanding of the photocatalytic processes and the associated surface mechanisms are needed. In this context, the production of C-C coupling dimers in a mixture of 2,5-dihydrofuran and tetrahydrofuran on irradiated ZnS indicates the surface reactivity of adsorbates with double bonds.15 In this work, the efficient and specific reduction of fumarate to succinate is purposely chosen as a model reaction to study the heterogeneous mechanism on ZnS. In this system, the reaction is not governed by the equilibrium thermodynamics, as for biological systems, because it should proceed favorably (E° = +0.031 V pH 7.0 and 298 K).16 Instead the reaction is sluggish due to kinetics limitations that can be reversed without the generation of side products upon irradiation of ZnS to proceed efficiently. This work aims to gain new fundamental understanding of the photocatalytic process, compare it to that of CO2 reduction,3 and provide insights conducting to improving the efficiency for the reductive carboxylation reactions on ZnS, e.g., for 2oxoglutarate. The determination of the bandgap of synthesized ZnS nanocrystallites suspended in water is explored by quantifying the rate of succinate production Rs at different cut-off wavelengths of irradiation (λcut-off). After studying the effect of pH on Rs, the apparent quantum yields of succinate production (Φs) at λ = 325 ± 20 nm are determined under continuous and periodic irradiation. The dependence of Φs on [Na2S] yields information to distinguish the


4

Page 5 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


timescales for hole loss and electron transfer for the model system. Finally, all observations are summarized in a proposed reaction mechanism showing the importance of adsorption processes as a limiting factor regulating the transfer time scale of charge carriers in photocatalysis. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS Catalyst Preparation. ZnS photocatalyst was freshly prepared at a loading of 2.3 g L-1 by dropwise addition of 100 mL of 50 mM Na2S (99.1 % assay, Sigma-Aldrich) to 100 mL of 50 mM ZnSO4 (ZnSO4·7H2O, Sigma-Aldrich ReagentPlus, 99.0 %) under continuous N2(g) (UHP, Scott-Gross) sparging.3 Degassed ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm, Elga Purelab Flex, Veolia) was used in all experiments. The concentration of stocked sulfide solution was measured after a 1:100 dilution with 2.00 M NaOH (99.3 % assay, Fisher Chemicals) using a sulfide ion selective electrode (Thermo, Orion 94-16).3 The previously diluted sulfide solution was further diluted with an equal volume of 2.00 M NaOH, and then titrated with 100 mM cadmium nitrate (cadmium nitrate tetrahydrate, Aldrich ≥ 99.0 %).3 The concentration of sulfide hole scavenger during photoirradiation was potentiometrically quantified using a calibration curve. The decrease of sulfide concentration followed a first order decay curve with a correlation coefficients r2 > 0.998. Photoirradiation Experiments. Experiments were performed by placing 100 mL of ZnS suspension in a 200 mL customized cylindrical quartz photoreactor surrounded with a water jacket.3 The temperature was kept at 15 °C by flowing water through the photoreactor from a circulating bath (Thermo Scientific SC100-A25).3 A 1 kW high-pressure Hg(Xe) arc lamp provided with a water filter, to remove infrared radiation, was used in combination with a cut-off optical filter. Optical filters with a cut off wavelength λcut-off = 280, 295, 305, 320, and 400 nm


5


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 32

were used in selected experiments.3 Results report the average of duplicate experiments with one standard deviation. In a typical experiment, the reduction of fumarate to succinate in an aqueous suspension of ZnS was conducted under continuous irradiation at λ ≥ 305 nm. A volume of 0.25 mL of [Na2S] = 3.270 M was added to the colloidal suspension, which was augmented with 1.0 mmol sodium fumarate (Alfa Aesar, 99.6 % assay). The initial concentration of sulfide was ~ 8.0 mM (pH ≈ 12.10) and dropped to ~ 2.0 mM upon adjustment to pH ~ 7.05 with H2SO4 (Acros Organics, 98.0 %). Φs was determined under continuous and periodic illumination from the ratio of rate of succinate production to the effective photon flux. The effective photon flux for the wavelength range 325 ± 20 nm was determined by potassium ferrioxalate actinometry after convoluting the spectrum of the actinometer17 with that reported for the catalyst in water.3 Light modulation by pulses from 0.02 to 2400 Hz, for illuminated periods lasting τL = 0.208 ms – 25 s on, were provided by a mechanical shutter and optical choppers as described previously.3 Aliquots (5 mL) were extracted from the reactor every 20 min and centrifuged at 4400 rpm for 5 min in the dark. Sulfide concentrations were monitored with the ion selective electrode as described above for experiments with initial [Na2S]0 = 1.03, 2.03, 5.07, and 10.07 mM. Control experiments (Table 1) were designed to prove that the only operative mechanism for fumarate reduction was photocatalysis. Each control tested whether succinate production proceeded or not in the absence of one of the following conditions: ZnS (control A), light (hv) (control B), fumarate (control C), and hole scavenger (controls D). Alternatively, the use of 8.0 mM sodium sulfite (99.9 % assay, Fisher chemicals) instead of Na2S as the hole scavenger was assayed in control E.


6

Page 7 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Table 1. Control experiments to demonstrate the photocatalytic production of succinate. Conditions

a

Product

ZnS

UV

Fumarate

Hole scavenger

Succinate

Experiment

+

+

+

+

+

Control A

-

+

+

+

-

Control B

+

-

+

+

-

Control C

+

+

-

+

-

Control D

+

+

+

-

-

Control E

+

+

+

+a

+

8.0 mM Na2SO3 was used instead of Na2S

Analysis of Products. All samples were centrifuged at 4400 rpm for 5 min, filtered (IC Acrodisc 0.2-µm pore size; Pall Corp.) to discard the precipitate, and diluted 8-times for analysis with a Dionex ICS-2000 Ion Chromatography system.3 This system was equipped with an AS autosampler (Dionex), a suppressor, a hydroxide (OH-) eluent generator (KOH cartridge EGC III, 0.38 mL/min as the flow rate), an anion trap column (CR-ATC), and a conductivity detector. Chromatographic separation of anions was carried out with an IonPac AS11-HC analytical column (2 × 250 mm) coupled with an IonPac AG11-HC guard column (2 × 50 mm).3 The initial


7


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 32

1 mM hydroxide concentration was kept constant for 8 min, and then increased linearly to 15 mM for 10 min, followed by a second gradient to 30 mM [OH-] for 10 min, and a third increment to 60 mM for 10 min.3 A 0.12 mL min-1 flow of 0.42 mM formic acid (Fisher Optima LC-MS grade, 99.6 % assay) in methanol (Fisher Optima LC/MS grade, 99.99 % assay) was mixed with the chromatographic eluent through a Tee connection.3 A mass spectrometer (Thermo MSQ Plus) interfaced by an electrospray ionization probe operating in negative ion mode allowed sample identification of the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of anions in the mixed flow. The optimized mass spectrometry parameters were: needle voltage 1.9 kV, cone voltage 50 V, probe temperature 450 °C, and nitrogen nebulizing 70 psi.3 Anions identified by mass spectrometry included fumarate (m/z 115), succinate (m/z 117), bicarbonate (m/z 61), bisulfite (m/z 81), bisulfate (m/z 97), hydrogen thiosulfate (m/z 113), and hydrogen dithionite (m/z 129). Succinate was quantified from calibration curves prepared with sodium succinate (Alfa Aesar, 99.75 % assay). In selected experiments, the concentration of fumarate was also monitored based on the comparison of integrated chromatographic peak areas to a calibration curve prepared using sodium fumarate. Mineral Characterization. The characterization and stability of the mineral was assessed after drying samples of ZnS as described before,3 by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopies as well as by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In summary, XRD spectra and TEM micrographs show the catalyst is the same before, during, after irradiation, and even after a second round of photolysis experiments when reusing ZnS.3 The concentration of dissolved Zn2+ during photoirradiation experiments was measured every 30 min by atomic absorption spectroscopy (Thermo Scientific iCE 3000 Series) at λ = 213.9 nm using a Zn hollow cathode lamp with a flame made of acetylene and air (both Scott Gross, UHP


8

Page 9 of 32

grade). A calibration curve was prepared with the same matrix using a non-irradiated sample under the same experimental conditions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Identification of Products. Figure 1 shows the ion chromatogram of species identified as products during the reduction of fumarate on ZnS colloids irradiated for 2 h at λ ≥ 305 nm. The separated chromatographic peaks correspond to anions eluting with m/z values with a retention time (tr ): succinic acid monoanion (m/z = 117, tr = 18.07 min), , bisulfite (m/z = 81, tr = 18.85 min), bicarbonate (m/z = 61, tr = 19.25 min), bisulfate (m/z = 97, tr = 19.32 min), fumaric acid monoanion (m/z = 115, tr = 20.06 min), hydrogen thiosulfate (m/z = 113, tr = 24.52 min), and

Extracted ion count (a.u.)

hydrogen dithionite (m/z = 129, tr = 32.30 min).

m/z 61 m/z 81 m/z 115 m/z 97 *

* m/z 113

m/z 117

m/z 129

Conductivity (µ µS)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


50

*

25

0 0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32

36

40

Retention time (min)

Figure 1. Ion chromatogram of a photolyzed (λ ≥ 305 nm) sample of 1.0 mM fumarate in 2.3 g L-1 ZnS at pH 7.02 for 2 h in the presence of [Na2S]0 = 2.0 mM. Extracted anion peaks for succinate (m/z 117), bicarbonate (m/z 61), bisulfite (m/z 81), bisulfate (m/z 97), fumarate (m/z 115), hydrogen thiosulfate (m/z 113), and hydrogen dithionite (m/z 129) are displayed. Peaks (*) at m/z 97 and 113 are scaled down 10-times.


9


The black traces in Figure 2 show examples for the production of succinate versus time at (solid squares) pH 5.32 and (empty circles) 7.02. The linear fitting to the experimental data yields succinate production rates with time, t (min), of Rs = 2.669 µM min-1 × t (r2 = 0.992) at pH 5.32, and Rs = 0.464 µM min-1× t (r2 = 0.984) at pH 7.02. Control experiments (Table 1) demonstrate that the reduction of fumarate to succinate proceeds by heterogeneous photocatalysis. Controls A-D showed no production of succinate. Specifically, the participation of any thermal reaction contributing to the reduction of fumarate in our system is discarded by control B in the absence of irradiation. Interestingly, succinate production was observed when substituting Na2S by 8.0 mM sodium sulfite as the hole scavenger (Control E). These results confirms that the reduction of fumarate proceeds with high yield and that no alternative products are generated,10 even when employing several cut-off irradiation filters (λcut-off ≥ 280, 295, 305, and 320 nm) or varying the pH (5-10).

400

50

40

30 200 20

2+

300

[Zn ] (µ µM)

[Succinate] (µ µ M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 32

100 10 0

0 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Irradiation time (min)

Figure 2. [Succinte] and dissolved [Zn2+] during 2 h irradiation (λ ≥ 305 nm). Key: Empty black circle = [succinate] at pH 7.02, solid black square = [succinate] pH 5.32, empty red triangle = [Zn2+] at pH 7.02, and solid red diamond = [Zn2+] at pH 5.32. Other conditions as listed in Figure 1.


10

Page 11 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


The integrity of ZnS at low pH is affected as the material starts to dissolve into Zn2+ and S2ions (Figure 2). For example, at pH 5.32, [Zn2+] rises exponentially with time according to [Zn ] = 43.7 × (1 − e. × ) (r2 = 0.997) reaching a plateau after 1 h with maximum [Zn2+]max = 43.7 µM (Figure 2). Even for this low pH, the generated excess of Zn2+ and the adsorption of H3O+ on the surface of ZnS are not sufficient to overturn the negative zeta potential ζpH = 5 = -20.12 mV.3, 18 This pH dependent dissolution of ZnS should not be confused with corrosion, which was observed in the absence of hole scavenger (e.g., [Zn2+] = 365.59 µM at pH = 7.02 after irradiation for 2 h). The photodecomposition of ZnS can proceed via an irreversible reduction of lattice zinc ions by conduction band electrons and the oxidation of lattice sulfide ions by holes.19 Therefore, the presence of dissolved sulfide ion hole scavenger in the experiment allows the reversal of photooxidation by providing a substitution mechanism that contributes to maintain the stability of ZnS during illumination.19 At pH ≥ 7.0, no dissolved Zn2+ was observed during irradiation, as depicted in the experiment at pH 7.02 (ζpH = 7 = -31.09 mV) in Figure 2, proving the stability of the catalyst. The production of elemental (rhombic) sulfur (S8) during photoirradiation was observed as a slight yellow color developed over the white background colloidal suspension. Raman microspectroscopy provided a confirmation for the generation of S8.3 A photoxidation mechanism in presence of HS- hole scavenger prevent the photodegradation of the photocatalyst by substituting S2- to the photooxidized lattice sites.19 As a result, S8 is produced during irradiation from the oxidation of sulfide hole scavenger. Identification of a Monoanion Intermediate as the Primary Electron Acceptor. Fumaric acid (pKa1 = 3.02 and pKa2 = 4.38 at 25 °C)20 can dissociate twice as indicated by the sequence of equilibrium reactions (1) and (2):


11


HCOO-CH=CH-COOH ⇄ HCOO-CH=CH-COO- + H+

(1)

HCOO-CH=CH-COO- ⇄ -COO-CH=CH-COO- + H+

(2)

Based in the speciation of fumaric acid for pH < pKa1, the diprotic form (H2A) is the major species present in equilibrium, and the completely dissociated form (A2-) is the dominant species for pH > pKa2. For the intermediate pH-range bracketed between pKa1 and pKa2, the monoanion form (HA-) of fumaric acid becomes the main species in equilibrium. The same concept applies to describe the dissociation of succinic acid, as a diprotic acid (pKa1 = 4.21 and pKa2 = 5.64)20 product. Figure 3 shows the dependence of the rate of succinate production Rs on pH and the speciation curves for the diprotic species succinic acid in the pH range 5.06-10.09. The direct correlation of the experimental Rs data to the calculated fraction of succinic acid monoanion (HA-) suggests this preferred photoproduct is directly generated from adsorbed monoprotic furmaric acid. In consequence, adsorbed fumaric acid monoanion is reduced by the sequential transfer of two electrons. These results agree with the trend observed for a smaller number of experiments that also monitored the initial rate of fumaric acid loss at variable pH.

1.0

H2 A

5

0.8

4 2-

A

0.6

3 2

0.4

-

HA

Fraction

Rs(µ µM/min)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 32

0.2

1

0.0

0 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 11 12 13 14

pH

Figure 3. Rate of succinate production (Rs) for λ ≥ 305 nm at variable pH and corresponding fractions of (dashed line) fumaric and (solid line) succinic acids available as diprotic acid (H2A,


12

Page 13 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


red trace), monoanion (HA-, green trace), and dianion (A2-, blue trace) species. Other conditions as listed in Figure 1.

The resembling behavior of both Rs and the fraction of succinic acid monoanion with pH depicts the surface reaction of adsorbed fumaric acid monoanion to start through a weak π-bond interaction with an active zinc site. The undissociated –COOH group of fumaric acid monoanion is in closer proximity to the surface than the dissociated –COO- group. A lone pair of electrons in the C=O moiety of the –COOH group could facilitate this configuration by establishing a second weak interaction with a contiguous zinc site. Instead, the dissociated –COO- group of fumaric acid monoanion is initially repelled from the negatively charged surface of ZnS with a point of zero charge at pH 4.2.3 The adsorption of the monoanion of fumaric acid by ZnS must occur reversibly21 in an adsorption-desorption equilibrium that is quickly established. The fast equilibrium proposed is needed to justify the quantification of dissolved species in the bulk liquid. However, the interchange between adsorbed and dissolves species must be slow as compared to the generation of excited states during illumination.

As stated above, the pH regulates the strength of the electrostatic interactions between fumaric and succinic acids with the nanoparticles of ZnS. While the associated binding constants for the process considered remains unknown, they can be assumed to be quite small so that the interaction between both substrates and the particles are labile.22 For low pH, the zeta-potential of ZnS becomes considerably less negative (ζpH = 5 = -20 mV)3 than at neutral conditions, while simultaneously the fraction of monodissociated carboxylic acid decreases as the concentration of the diprotic species growths. This intermediate protic form may also represent the optimized structure for succinic acid to be desorbed from the surface preventing the reverse charge transfer


13


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 32

reaction between succinic acid and a hole. Therefore, the pH of the colloidal suspension plays a role for the optimum adsorption to balance out the surface charge of the nanoparticles and the availability of less repulsive substrates. Overall, the photocatalytic reduction of fumaric acid on the surface of ZnS proceeds through the most stable configuration of the intermediate formed on the surface. During the progression of the reaction, this intermediate is depleted and replenished on the surface by other molecules of fumaric acid available. Bandgap Determination of ZnS in Water from Reaction Rates. The bandgap energy of ZnS colloidal suspensions in water was reported in our previous study based on the dependence of the reaction rate of formic acid production from CO2 (

!"##$ )

on the cut-of wavelength of

irradiation.3 This work serves as a new demonstration that measuring a reaction rate such as the reduction of fumarate to succinate on photo-excited ZnS reveals the bandgap energy of the semiconductor suspended in water. The measured rate of succinate production in units of µM × min-1 is Rs = 0.739 ± 0.020 (r2 = 0.994), 0.600 ± 0.022 (r2 = 0.986), 0.464 ± 0.002 (r2 = 0.984), and 0.298 ± 0.002 (r2 = 0.992), for irradiation at λcut-off ≥ 280, 295, 305, and 320 nm, respectively. No production of succinate was observed for irradiation at λcut-off ≥ 400 nm. Figure 4 shows the linear regression fitting of the four quantifiable fumarate production rates vs. λcut-off, in which Rs (µM min-1) = 3.971 - 0.0115 × λ (% = 0.999) is extrapolated to Rs = 0 to intercept the abscise at λcut-off = 345 nm. This extrapolated value represents the minimum energy required to excite the mineral catalyst for the photoreduction of fumarate to occur, which corresponds to EBG for ZnS.


14

3

Reaction rate (µ µ M/min)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


0.15

2

0.10 RHCOO-

1

0.05 Rs

0 250

Absorbance (A.U.)

Page 15 of 32

0.00 300

350

400

λ (nm)

Figure 4. Reaction rate of (black circle) succinate (Rs) production vs. cut-off wavelengths of irradiation. Other conditions as listed in Figure 1. For comparison, the reaction rate of (blue triangle) formate production ( !"##$ ) from CO2 and the diffused reflectance absorption spectrum of ZnS in water from Ref. 3 are included.

The extrapolated value of λcut-off = 345 nm is in an excellent agreement with the measured photoreduction rate of CO2 to formate on ZnS

!"##$

(µM/min) = 14.152 – 0.0410 × λcut-off

(% = 0.995).3 Thus, this wavelength can be used to obtain the bandgap of the semiconductor accordingly to EBG = h c/λcut-off = 5.74 × 10-19 J ≡ 3.59 eV, where h is the Plank constant and c is the speed of light. Therefore, this bandgap value measured during reactions in water confirms our previous finding and agrees well with the reported absorption spectrum for a colloidal suspension of ZnS (Figure 4).3 Apparent Quantum Yields under Continuous and Periodic Illumination. The photoreduction of fumarate on ZnS was studied under continuous and periodic illumination experiments at λ = 325 ± 20 nm. The effective photon flux (I0) was obtained after correcting the actinometric measurement by convoluting the spectrum of ferrioxalate17 with that for ZnS in water.3 The calculation of the apparent quantum yield of succinate production at λ = 325 ± 20 nm was directly derived from the ratio of the reaction rate to the effective photon flux: Φs (%) = 100 × Rs/I0. This Φs value represents a lower limit for the actual quantum yield, because light is


15


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 32

extinguished by absorbing and scattering particles.23 For example, experiments under continuous illumination of 2.3 g L-1 ZnS with 1.0 mM fumarate, [Na2S]0 = 2.0 mM, at 15 °C and pH 6.73, proceed with a reaction rate Rs = 7.74 × 10-9 mol L-1 s-1, which combined to the measured I0 = 2.02 × 10-7 einstein L-1 s-1 yields Φs = 3.85 %. Despite any factors that could affect the measured Φs values,24 the information below if of general interest because it resolves the lifetime of redox carrier on the surface of photo-excited ZnS during the reduction of fumarate. For this purpose, a series of experiments applied monochromatic periodic illumination with equally lasting dark (τD) and bright (τL) cycles to study how Φs varies in the range 208 µs ≤ τL ≤ 1 s. For example, Figure 5 shows the dependence of Φs on τL, for an initital hole scavenger concentration [Na2S]0 = 2.00 and pH = 7.00. For the fastest time intervals explored, as τL → 0 the apparent quantum yield under periodic illumination ΦL→0 is practically identical to that measured under the continuous irradiation (Φs = 3.85 %). When moving from the measured ΦL→0 value to the right in Figure 5, for progressively longer bright intervals, lower quantum yields are registered down to a minimum ΦL→∞ = 0.16 % as τL → ∞. During this transition from ΦL→0 to ΦL→∞ in Figure 5, there are two inflection points associated to redox carriers with different reactivity.3, 25 After fitting a double sigmoid curve to the data in Figure 5 using nonlinear least-squares regression, the infection points are extracted from the second derivative are t1 = 320 µs and t2 = 4.87 ms.


16

Page 17 of 32

4

3

Φs (%)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


2

1

0 0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

τL (s)

Figure 5. Apparent quantum yield of succinate production (Φs) vs. the bright interval time under periodic illumination (τL) of 2.3 g L-1 ZnS with 1.0 mM fumarate at pH = 7.0 and [Na2S]0 = 2.03 mM.

Similar values of t1 = 296 µs (in the order of hundreds of microseconds) and t2 = 4.48 ms (in the order of a few milliseconds) can also be obtained from the two inflexion points measured when plotting the first-order rate constant of sulfide decay ( &!' ( ) vs. τL, as described previously.3 While sulfide was confirmed to remain stable in dark controls, experiments under periodic illumination at variable [Na2S]0 allowed the assignment of t1 to the transfer of reducing conduction band electrons to the monoanion of fumaric acid. Accordingly, t2 corresponds to the loss of oxidizing valence-band holes during the photooxidation of hole scavenger species. The relationship of t1 and t2 to the redox carriers is explained by their dependence on [Na2S]0 = 1.03, 2.03, 5.07, and 10.07 mM, all values involving initial concentrations of the hole scavenger < 65 mM3 of submonolayer coverage of ZnS. The correlation of [Na2S] versus ζ follows an exponential function reported in our previous work.3 Considering that the surface potential of ZnS can be represented by ζ for unchanged permittivity and viscosity in the electrical double layer,26-27 an increment of [Na2S]0, is


17


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 32

associated to a more negative surface potential. Assuming that suspended ZnS particles under irradiation behave as microelectrodes, the surface potential of the mineral can be related to the half-reduction and half-oxidation rate constants from the Bulter-Volmer (BV) equation,3, which are &)*+ = & , -

./01 2/01 3 6(7 7 8 ) 45

, and &9: = & ,

. 2 3 - ;< ;< 6(7 7 8 ) 45

25

, where nred and nox are

the number of electrons transferred in each half-reaction, k0 is the standard heterogeneous rate constant, αred and αox are the dimensionless charge transfer coefficients, E is the excess redox potential, E0 is the standard redox potential of ZnS, R is the gas constant, F is the Faraday constant, and T is the absolute temperature. Figure 6A shows the opposite trends that the lifetime for both redox transitions t1 and t2 have for increasing [Na2S]0. Figure 6B displays, as predicted by the expressions for the rate constants kred and kox, the opposing trends for the dependence of t1 and t2 on ζ. Given the opposite signs in the exponential terms of the rate constants expressions (negative for kred and positive for kox), and the reciprocal dependence between lifetimes on rate constants, it follows that the first transition t1 ∝ kred-1 and the second transition t2 ∝ kox-1. Therefore, as the potential represented by ζ becomes more negative (for higher [Na2S]0) t1 decreases while t2 increases in Figure 6. This interpretation agrees with t1 being related to kred as reported for the reduction of CO2 on ZnS3 and the generation of gaseous H2 on CdS.28 In other words, t1 represents the overall time needed to transfer conduction band electrons to reduce fumarate to succinate. These t1 values (from 225 to 330 µs) are well in the order of the lifetime of conduction band electrons (~200 µS) observed for CdSe/CdS sensitized solar cells coated with two layers of ZnS for a photovoltage of 0.5 V.29 Similarly, t2 characterizes the slower loss of oxidizing valence-band holes. Figure 6B also includes the linear fittings to the semi-log plot: log t1 = 0.02079 ζ+ 0.1785 (r2 = 0.934), and log t2


18

Page 19 of 32

= -0.06809 ζ + 1.714 (r2 = 0.981). These transitions (t1 and t2) become undistinguishable at 520 µs for a zeta potential ζ = -22.09 mV corresponding to [Na2S] = 0.57 mM.

10

t (ms)

A t2

5

α

ko 1/

x

t1 α 1/kred

0 0.1

1

10

100

[Na2S] (mM) 10

t (ms)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


log t 2 = - 0 .0

B 7153 ζ-

1.860 4, r 2 =

1 log t1 = 0.02079

0.1 -40

-35

0.980

2 34 ζ + 0.1785, r = 0.9

-30

-25

-20

ζ (mV)

Figure 6. Transitions (●) t1 and (▲) t2 vs. (A) variable [Na2S]0 and (B) zeta potential (ζ). The red solid and black dashed lines show the linear least squares regressions, which intercept for a coverage of [Na2S] = 0.57 mM, corresponding to ζ = -22.09 mV and t = 520 µs.

The relatively long times linked to electron transfer and hole loss at the surface of the photoexited ZnS* semiconductor nanoparticles provides fundamental information to understand the dynamic process of photocatalysis.30 The measured transfer of surface carriers are relatively long (>200 µs for the transfer of mobile electrons and a few milliseconds for loss of fixed holes) when compared with the time scales explored by time-resolved spectroscopy of semiconductors (e.g., 150 fs ≤ τ1/2 < 100 µs).30 Averages values of >@? = 307 ± 17 µs and >@ = 4.68 ± 0.28 ms are obtained for [Na2S]0 = 2.0 mM at pH 7 from the data in Figures 5 and by measuring &!' ( vs τL. The fact that >@? and >@ are 11 and 29 times shorter than the corresponding values for the


19


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 32

reduction of CO2 (using pure inorganic reagents) to formate under the same conditions3 indicates the structure of the adsorbate modifies the lifetime of the surface-active center of ZnS*.31 Overall, these results reveal concepts that can be used to optimize applications of photocatalysis such as wastewater treatment, abatement of air pollution, and energy production.30 Proposed Mechanism for the Reduction of Fumarate on ZnS. A strictly heterogeneous photoprocess is considered to propose in Scheme 1 a reaction mechanism describing the kinetic behavior observed in experiments performed under variable pH, λcut-off, τL and ζ. The previous assumption is useful to simplify the mechanistic scheme proposed, which is not necessarily the concluding pathway for the reactions.31 Reaction R1 in Scheme 1 shows that upon absorption of a photon (λ ≤ 345 nm) by ZnS, an oxidizing hole is created in the valence-band from where an electron is promoted to the conduction band.32 The electron-hole pair can undergo recombination and release heat by reaction R2 (Scheme 1) in processes that likely involves the trapping of charge carriers by defects and the carrier recombination that occurs through such defects (recombination centers).31 The sacrificial sulfide electron donor is oxidized by valence band holes through several intermediates (S8, S2O32-, SO32-, and S2O62-) en route to form sulfate by reaction R3 (Scheme 1).3 Simultaneously, fumaric acid is chemisorbed in dynamic equilibrium at an active zinc surface center and accepts a first electron via reaction R4 (Scheme 1).15


20

Page 21 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Scheme 1. Proposed mechanism for the reduction of fumurate to succinate on irradiated ZnS for the interval 5.06 ≤ pH < 7.00.

While the surface of ZnS can be considered as reversibly hydrated in an exchange that also allows adsorption of the organic molecules, this solvation process can affect the size as well as chemical and physical properties of ZnS. For example, if ZnS in aqueous suspensions adsorbs a proton or hydroxide ions, either positive or negative surface charges are generated.33 The hydration mechanism of aqueous ZnS in water can be explained at variable pH as follows:34 1) For pH < 4.2, the isoelectric point of ZnS, the surface becomes positively charged due to the neutralization of any negative charges from sulfide sites and that dissolution releases Zn2+


21


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 22 of 32

(Figure 2). 2) For the interval 4.2 < pH < 7.0, the acquisition of negative charge by the surface is proposed to be related to the Lewis acidity of zinc sites that forms ≡SZnOH- and release protons to the medium. 3) For basic conditions (pH > 7.0), negative surface sites such as ≡ZnOH- exist together with aqueous sulfide ions (HS-, S2-) in the bulk solution, all contributing to the observed negative zeta-potential of ZnS.35 However, because Zn2+ is a borderline Lewis acid,36 the exchange of adsorbed water or hydroxide ion by surface zinc occurs so fast that these active sites are continuously available for adsorption of fumaric acid. Two additional problems that need to be approached are: 1) What is the most stable conformational isomer adsorbed to zinc sites? 2) How does adsorption occur? Based on the acidbase equilibria that optimizes the recognition of fumaric acid by the surface-active sites of ZnS*, the mechanism in Scheme 1 depicts the monoanion species as the primary electron acceptor adsorbed on the surface to the left side of reaction R4. Considering conformational isomerism is useful to identify the most stable monoanion species adsorbed on the mineral surface to undergo photoreduction to form succinic acid monoanion. The structures of two conformational isomers for the monoanion of fumaric acid are displayed in Scheme 2, where the carboxylate group is delocalized by resonance. These isomers differ mainly in the distance between the centers C2 and O4, which are calculated to be 3.56 ± 0.04 Å for isomer A and 2.75 ± 0.06 Å for isomer B.37-38 The higher stability of isomer A is supported by a computational optimization of the molecular geometry and zero-point energy of both isomers using Gaussian 09 with B3LYP density functional theory methods39-40 and a Gaussian 6-311G (d,p) basis set41-42 we performed. Isomer B is predicted as less stable than isomer A due to steric hindrance existing between the two π bonds.


22

Page 23 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Scheme 2. Structure of two conformational isomers of monodissociated fumaric acid.

The surface of synthesized ZnS exhibits a face-centered cubic structure with four tetrahedral holes in each unit cell of length 5.39 ± 0.01 Å.3 The calculated distance between two zinc centers on the surface is 3.81 ± 0.01 Å (see powder XRD measurements in Ref 3). With all the previous considerations, Figure 7A depicts the reversible adsorption of fumaric acid monoanion that likely results from a weak olefin π bond interaction with an active zinc site (reactant of reaction R4, Scheme 1). Similarly, the weak adsorption at a single zinc atom was observed for cyclic olefins on ZnS, which occurs through the formation of a π-complex with an electron-deficient surface center.15 However, because the distance between two zinc sites (3.81 ± 0.01 Å) is only slightly larger than the distance between C2 and O4 atoms for conformer A in Scheme 2 (3.56 ± 0.04 Å), a double interaction with two zinc sites could arise from the π bond and a lone pair from the O4 atom in conformer A (Figure 7B). Therefore, the second adsorption model involving a stable σ bond appears less favorable because desorption of the product could be prevented.


23


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 24 of 32

Figure 7. Adsorption of monodissociated fumaric acid on the surface of ZnS by interactions of (A) one zinc site to a π bond, and (B) two zinc sites to the π bond and a lone pair in a carbonylic oxygen atom.

Following the transfer of a first conduction band electron to the monoanion of fumaric acid, a short-lived radical centered on carbon C3 of conformer A (Scheme 2) is produced by reaction R4 (Scheme 1). This adsorbed radical is stabilized by resonance with a carbonyl group. The transfer of a second electron to the previous radical intermediate also occurs on the surface of ZnS* facilitated by zinc sites to form an adsorbed carbanion depicted in reaction R5 (Scheme 1). The next steps are the sequential abstraction of protons from water (or hydronium for pH < 7) in reactions R6 and R7. Proton abstraction by reaction R7 occurs concomitantly to the surface desorption of succinic acid monoanion, as confirmed by the small rise in pH associated to the consumption of protons observed. Since the surface of ZnS is negatively charged at pH > 4.2,3 the carboxylate group of the monoanions of fumaric and succinic acids are repelled from the surface, contributing to the desorption process of the product. CONCLUSIONS The data from experiments under periodic illumination demonstrate that the timespan needed to establish equilibrium condition between bulk and surface adsorbed fumaric acid monoanion is


24

Page 25 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


in the order of hundreds of microseconds. This conclusion is derived from modifying the period allowing replenishment of fumaric acid adsorption in the dark to contrast the depletion of reactive surface species during illumination. The simple zero-order kinetic behavior for the production of succinate indicates that the surface is quickly depleted of fumaric acid monoanion. The previous observation suggests that adsorption of fresh reagent limits (kinetic control) the zero-order rate of reaction. Therefore, the rate of electron transfer to the adsorbed species is limited by the rate of replenishment of fresh reactant from the solution. Further work should aim to advance this matter by studying the Langmuir isotherm derived from experiments at variable fumaric acid concentration that will change the surface coverage of ZnS. Characteristic surface carriers remain active for several hundred microseconds for electron transfer and a few millisecond for the loss of oxidizing holes. This study confirms that reactive intermediates in a photoexcited semiconductor exist for relative long times, as observed before for adsorbed CO2 undergoing reduction to HCOO- on the surface ZnS*,3 when compared to the values measured by time-resolved spectroscopy of semiconductors (e.g., 150 fs ≤ τ1/2 < 100 µs).30 The photoproduction of succinic acid in aqueous colloidal suspensions of ZnS in the presence of Na2S directly consumes monodissociated fumaric acid as the adsorbed species. The reported bandgap of ZnS in water based on the dependence of Rs on λcut-off agrees well with previous findings for the production of formate.3 The measurement of Φs under periodic illumination provides important evidence that the time scale of redox processes on the surface of semiconductors –the effective transfer of reactive carriers– is in the same order for sorptiondesorption equilibrium. For the previous reason the structure of the adsorbate affects the lifetime of the surface-active center of the photocatalyst.31 Overall, these results reveal new knowledge needed in the optimization of future applications of photocatalysis for fuel production,


25


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 26 of 32

wastewater treatment, the abatement of air pollution, prebiotic chemistry, and abiotic photosynthesis.6, 30

ASSOCIATED CONTENT Supporting Information. A further discussion of the context of this research. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/. AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author *Email: [email protected]. Phone: (859)323-2892. Funding Sources NSF CAREER award CHE-1255290. Notes The authors declare no competing financial interests. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We thank research funding from NSF CAREER award (CHE-1255290) to M.I.G. Partial support from the University of Kentucky by a Research Challenge Trust Fund Fellowship to R.Z. is gratefully acknowledged. ABBREVIATIONS Eo, standard reduction potential; EBG, bandgap; h+, oxidizing hole; I0, effective photon flux; &!' ( , first-order rate constant of sulfide decay; Rs, rate of succinate production;

!"##$ ,

rate of


26

Page 27 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


formate production; Φs, apparent quantum yield of succinate production; Φ!"##$ , apparent quantum yield of formate production; λcut-off, cut-off wavelength of irradiation; τL, bright interval time under periodic illumination; ζ, zeta potential. REFERENCES (1) Habisreutinger, S. N.; Schmidt-Mende, L.; Stolarczyk, J. K., Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 on TiO2 and other semiconductors. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2013, 52, 7372-7408. (2) Hisatomi, T.; Kubota, J.; Domen, K., Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7520-7535. (3) Zhou, R.; Guzman, M. I., CO2 reduction under periodic illumination of ZnS. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 11649-11656. (4) Park, H.; Ou, H.-H.; Colussi, A. J.; Hoffmann, M. R., Artificial photosynthesis of C1–C3 hydrocarbons from water and CO2 on titanate nanotubes decorated with nanoparticle elemental copper and CdS quantum dots. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 4658-4666. (5) White, J. L., et al., Light-driven heterogeneous reduction of carbon dioxide: Photocatalysts and photoelectrodes. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12888-12935. (6) Guzman, M. I., Abiotic Photosynthesis: From Prebiotic Chemistry to Metabolism. In Origins of Life: The Primal Self-Organization, Egel, R.; Lankenau, D.-H.; Mulkidjanian, A. Y., Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 2011; pp 85-105. (7) Guzman, M. I.; Martin, S. T., Oxaloacetate-to-malate conversion by mineral photoelectrochemistry: Implications for the viability of the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle in prebiotic chemistry. Int. J. Astrobiol. 2008, 7, 271-278.


27


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 28 of 32

(8) Guzman, M. I.; Martin, S. T., Prebiotic metabolism: Production by mineral photoelectrochemistry of α-ketocarboxylic acids in the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle. Astrobiology 2009, 9, 833-842. (9) Guzman, M. I.; Martin, S. T., Photo-production of lactate from glyoxylate: How minerals can facilitate energy storage in a prebiotic world. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2265-2267. (10) Zhang, X. V.; Martin, S. T., Driving parts of Krebs cycle in reverse through mineral photochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16032-16033. (11) Zimmer, C., How and where did life on Earth arise? Science 2005, 309, 89-89. (12) Mulkidjanian, A. Y., On the origin of life in the Zinc world: 1. Photosynthesizing, porous edifices built of hydrothermally precipitated zinc sulfide as cradles of life on Earth. Biol. Direct 2009, 4, 1-39. (13) Mulkidjanian, A. Y.; Galperin, M. Y., On the origin of life in the Zinc world. 2. Validation of the hypothesis on the photosynthesizing zinc sulfide edifices as cradles of life on Earth. Biol. Direct 2009, 4, 1-37. (14) Zhang, X. V.; Ellery, S. P.; Friend, C. M.; Holland, H. D.; Michel, F. M.; Schoonen, M. A. A.; Martin, S. T., Photodriven reduction and oxidation reactions on colloidal semiconductor particles: Implications for prebiotic syntheis. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 2007, 185, 301-311. (15) Hörner, G.; Johne, P.; Künneth, R.; Twardzik, G.; Roth, H.; Clark, T.; Kisch, H., Heterogeneous photocatalysis, part XIX. Semiconductor type A photocatalysis: role of substrate adsorption and the nature of photoreactive surface sites in zinc sulfide catalyzed C–C coupling reactions. Chem.-Eur. J. 1999, 5, 208-217. (16) Nelson, D. L.; Cox, M., Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 4rd ed.; W. H. Freeman: New York, 2004.


28

Page 29 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(17) Hatchard, C. G.; Parker, C. A., A new sensitive chemical actinometer. II. Potassium ferrioxalate as a standard chemical actinometer. Proc. R. Soc. A 1956, 235, 518-536. (18) Williams, R.; Labib, M. E., Zinc sulfide surface chemistry: An electrokinetic study. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 1985, 106, 251-254. (19) Becker, W. G.; Bard, A. J., Photoluminescence and photoinduced oxygen adsorption of colloidal zinc sulfide dispersions. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 4888-4893. (20) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 93rd ed.; CRC Press/Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL, 2013. (21) Senger, B.; Voegel, J. C.; Schaaf, P., Irreversible adsorption of colloidal particles on solid substrates. Colloids Surface A 2000, 165, 255-285. (22) Aslam, M.; Mulla, I. S.; Vijayamohanan, K., Hydrophobic organization of monolayerprotected Au clusters on thiol-functionalized Au(111) surfaces. Langmuir 2001, 17, 7487-7493. (23) Serpone, N., Relative photonic efficiencies and quantum yields in heterogeneous photocatalysis. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 1997, 104, 1-12. (24) Mills, A.; Le Hunte, S., An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 1997, 108, 1-35. (25) Cornu, C. J. G.; Colussi, A. J.; Hoffmann, M. R., Time scales and pH dependences of the redox processes determining the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2 nanoparticles from periodic illumination experiments in the stochastic regime. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 3156-3160. (26) Delgado, A. V.; Gonzalez-Caballero, F.; Hunter, R. J.; Koopal, L. K.; Lyklema, J., Measurement and interpretation of Eeectrokinetic phenomena. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2007, 309, 194-224.


29


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 30 of 32

(27) Kirby, B., Micro- and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices; Cambridge University Press, 2010. (28) Zhao, J.; Holmes, M. A.; Osterloh, F. E., Quantum confinement controls photocatalysis: A free energy analysis for photocatalytic proton reduction at CdSe nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4316-4325. (29) Ahmed, R.; Zhao, L.; Mozer, A. J.; Will, G.; Bell, J.; Wang, H., Enhanced electron lifetime of CdSe/CdS quantum dot (QD) sensitized solar cells using ZnSe core–shell structure with efficient regeneration of quantum dots. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 2297-2307. (30) Mohamed, H. H.; Bahnemann, D. W., The role of electron transfer in photocatalysis: Fact and fictions. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2012, 128, 91-104. (31) Emeline, A. V.; Ryabchuk, V. K.; Serpone, N., Dogmas and Misconceptions in Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. Some Enlightened Reflections. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 18515-18521. (32) Kisch, H., Semiconductor Photocatalysis: Principles and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Weinheim, Germany, 2014. (33) Wang, M.; Zhang, Q.; Hao, W.; Sun, Z., Surface stoichiometry of zinc sulfide and its effect on the adsorption behaviors of xanthate. Chem. Cent. J. 2011, 5, 73. (34) Sun, Z.; Forsling, W.; Rönngren, L.; Sjöberg, S., Surface reactions in aqueous metal sulfide systems. 1. Fundamental surface reactions of hydrous PbS and ZnS. Int. J. Miner. Process. 1991, 33, 83-93. (35) Rönngren, L.; Sjöberg, S.; Sun, Z.; Forsling, W.; Schindler, P., Surface reactions in aqueous metal sulfide systems: 2. Ion exchange and acid/base reactions at the ZnSH2O interface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1991, 145, 396.


30

Page 31 of 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(36) Pearson, R. G. j., Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part 1: Fundamental principles. J. Chem. Educ. 1968, 45, 581. (37) Brown, C. J., The crystal structure of fumaric acid. Acta Crystallogr. 1966, 21, 1-5. (38) Bednowitz, A. L.; Post, B., Direct determination of the crystal structure of β-fumaric acid. Acta Crystallogr. 1966, 21, 566-571. (39) Miehlich, B.; Savin, A.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H., Results obtained with the correlation energy density functionals of Becke and Lee, Yang and Parr. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 157, 200-206. (40) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G., Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785. (41) McLean, A. D.; Chandler, G. S., Contracted Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations. I. Second row atoms, Z = 11–18. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 5639-5648. (42) Krishnan, R. B. J. S.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A., Self‐consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650654.


31


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 32 of 32

TOC


32

Photocatalytic Reduction of Fumarate to Succinate ... - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents